spatial variation of soil properties - geo-slope...

6
GEO-SLOPE International Ltd, Calgary, Alberta, Canada www.geo-slope.com SLOPE/W Example File: Spatial variation of soil properties (pdf)(gsz) Page 1 of 6 Spatial variation of soil properties 1 Introduction The undrained strength of a soft soil deposit is frequently a function of the effective overburden; that is, the strength varies with depth. Sometimes, the undrained strength can also vary laterally perhaps due to some past loading of a confined area. A typical case is illustrated in Figure 1. The foundation contours show the spatial variation of the undrained strength (cohesion). The undrained strength of the peat varies laterally under the dam. The cohesion in the embankment is constant. The total unit weight may also vary in a similar fashion. Figure 1 An example of spatial variation of undrained strength (copied from the text book, Soil Strength and Slope Stability, by J.M. Duncan and S. G. Wright, page 147, published by John Wiley) This type of situation can be defined in SLOPE/W with what are known as Spatial and Linear functions. 2 Foundation soil 2.1 Undrained strength - cohesion The foundation undrained strength is defined with a spatial function. The undrained strength is specified at a series of data points. It is necessary to specify the x-y coordinates of the Points and the Cohesion at that point. The edit dialog box for specifying the data is presented in Figure 2. The data can be specified by entering the numeric values for the x- and y-coordinates together with the corresponding cohesion. Alternatively, data can be specified by entering a cohesion value and then “Drawing” the points by clicking at appropriate locations.

Upload: ngokiet

Post on 15-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

GEO-SLOPE International Ltd, Calgary, Alberta, Canada www.geo-slope.com

SLOPE/W Example File: Spatial variation of soil properties (pdf)(gsz) Page 1 of 6

Spatial variation of soil properties 1 Introduction

The undrained strength of a soft soil deposit is frequently a function of the effective overburden; that is, the strength varies with depth. Sometimes, the undrained strength can also vary laterally perhaps due to some past loading of a confined area. A typical case is illustrated in Figure 1. The foundation contours show the spatial variation of the undrained strength (cohesion). The undrained strength of the peat varies laterally under the dam. The cohesion in the embankment is constant.

The total unit weight may also vary in a similar fashion.

Figure 1 An example of spatial variation of undrained strength (copied from the text book, Soil Strength and Slope Stability, by J.M. Duncan and S. G. Wright, page 147, published by John Wiley)

This type of situation can be defined in SLOPE/W with what are known as Spatial and Linear functions.

2 Foundation soil

2.1 Undrained strength - cohesion

The foundation undrained strength is defined with a spatial function. The undrained strength is specified at a series of data points. It is necessary to specify the x-y coordinates of the Points and the Cohesion at that point. The edit dialog box for specifying the data is presented in Figure 2.

The data can be specified by entering the numeric values for the x- and y-coordinates together with the corresponding cohesion. Alternatively, data can be specified by entering a cohesion value and then “Drawing” the points by clicking at appropriate locations.

GEO-SLOPE International Ltd, Calgary, Alberta, Canada www.geo-slope.com

SLOPE/W Example File: Spatial variation of soil properties (pdf)(gsz) Page 2 of 6

Figure 2 Illustration of x-y data points with a specified cohesion

Once the data points have been defined, SLOPE/W will contour the data within the region that has the property of that particular spatial function, as illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3 Specified data points and resulting contours of the cohesion

GEO-SLOPE International Ltd, Calgary, Alberta, Canada www.geo-slope.com

SLOPE/W Example File: Spatial variation of soil properties (pdf)(gsz) Page 3 of 6

2.2 Foundation unit weight

The same can be done for the total unit weight of the foundation soil, as illustrated in Figure 4.

Figure 4 Variation of unit weight in the foundation

3 Peat layer

The lateral variation of the cohesion and unit weight in the peat can be defined with Linear functions, as in Figure 5 and Figure 6.

Figure 5 Variation of the undrained strength in the peat layer

112

114

116 118

120

114

114

116

116

118

118

Peat strength

Coh

esio

n (p

sf)

X (ft)

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

-50-100-150 0 50 100 150

GEO-SLOPE International Ltd, Calgary, Alberta, Canada www.geo-slope.com

SLOPE/W Example File: Spatial variation of soil properties (pdf)(gsz) Page 4 of 6

Figure 6 Variation of the unit weight in the peat layer

4 Embankment material

The properties of the embankment material are constant with respect to space or distance.

5 Material property contours

The final contours of cohesion and unit, as defined for the whole problem, are shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8.

Figure 7 Contours of cohesion

Peat weightU

nit W

eigh

t (pc

f)

X (ft)

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

-50-100-150 0 50 100 150

400

600

800

1000

Mohicanville Dike

GEO-SLOPE International Ltd, Calgary, Alberta, Canada www.geo-slope.com

SLOPE/W Example File: Spatial variation of soil properties (pdf)(gsz) Page 5 of 6

Figure 8 Contours of unit weight

Note that the contours are not continuous across the geometric regions. Each region or group of regions with the same function is contoured separately.

6 Cohesion along the slip surface

Figure 9 shows a typical potential slip surface. Figure 10 shows the variation in cohesion along the slip surface.

Figure 9 A typical slip surface position

112

114

116 118

120

116

118

118

Mohicanville Dike

GEO-SLOPE International Ltd, Calgary, Alberta, Canada www.geo-slope.com

SLOPE/W Example File: Spatial variation of soil properties (pdf)(gsz) Page 6 of 6

Figure 10 Variation of cohesion along the slip surface

Figure 10 is created with the Graph command in CONTOUR.

It is always advisable to spot check that the definition has been correctly used in the factor of safety calculations by plotting parameters like cohesion along the slip surface, particularly when using material property functions.

7 Concluding comments

It is important to note that these spatial material property functions are unique to a particular problem and a specific set of x-y coordinates. They cannot be used in other cases, unless the coordinate space and problem definition are very similar.

This example vividly presents an illustration of how material properties that have a spatial variation can be defined and used in SLOPE/W.

CohesionC

ohes

ive

(psf

)

X (ft)

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140