spatial distribution of different forms of sedimentary phosphorus in florida bay:

24
Spatial Distribution of Different Forms of Sedimentary Phosphorus in Florida Bay: sequential extraction approach Jia-Zhong Zhang and Charles Fischer Ocean Chemistry Division, AOML, NOAA, Miami, FL 33149

Upload: easter

Post on 15-Jan-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Spatial Distribution of Different Forms of Sedimentary Phosphorus in Florida Bay: sequential extraction approach Jia-Zhong Zhang and Charles Fischer Ocean Chemistry Division, AOML, NOAA, Miami, FL 33149. Florida Bay. Bottom type. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Spatial Distribution of Different Forms of

Sedimentary Phosphorus in Florida Bay:

sequential extraction approach

Jia-Zhong Zhang and Charles Fischer

Ocean Chemistry Division, AOML, NOAA, Miami, FL 33149

 

Page 2: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Florida Bay

Page 3: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Bottom type

Page 4: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Low phosphate concentration in Florida Bay waterZhang & Chi, 2002

-81.2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Longitude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3

La

titu

de

0

10

20

30

40

50

[PO 4] (nM )

South Florida

Atlantic Ocean

Gulf of Mexico

Page 5: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Sediment sampling station

-81.2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Longitude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3

La

titu

de

12

34

5

6

78910

11

1213

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

2122

232425

26

27

282930

3132

33

3435

3637

3839 40

Page 6: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Sequential extraction procedure

IP, TP Step 1 Step 2 IP Step 3 IP, TP Step 4 IP Step 5 IP

0.5 g, <124 m dry sediment

50 ml pH8 1 M MgCl2

2 hour

50 ml BD 4 hour

0.5M NaCl Rinse, 2 hour

50 ml Acetate Buffer 6hour

1 M MgCl2 Rinse, 2 hour

50 ml 1 M HCl 16 hour

Ash 550oC 1M HCl 16 hour

Adsorbed inorganic P Leachable organic P

Fe-bound inorganic P

Authegenic Apatite CaCO3-bound P Leachable organic P

Detrital Apaptite

Refractory organic P

Page 7: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Percentage of CaCO3 in Florida Bay sediments

-81 .2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Longitude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3

La

titu

de

8 1

8 4

8 7

9 0

9 2

9 4

% C a C O 3

Page 8: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Total Sedimentary Phosphorus in Florida Bay

-81.2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Longitude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3

La

titu

de

1

3

5

7

9

11

13

Tota l P(um ol/g)

Page 9: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Total exchangeable phosphorus by MgCl2 extraction

-81.2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Longitude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3

La

titu

de

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.7

0.9

1.1

M gC l2-TP(um ol/g)

Page 10: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Exchangeable Inorganic phosphorus by MgCl2 extraction

-81.2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Longitude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3

La

titu

de

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

M gC l2-IP(um ol/g)

Page 11: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Exchangeable organic phosphorus by MgCl2 extraction

-81 .2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Longitude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3

La

titu

de

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

M gC l2-O P(um ol/g)

Page 12: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Iron-bound Phosphorus by dithionite extraction

-81.2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Longitude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3

La

titu

de

0.2

0.6

1

1.4

1.8

2.2

BD-IP(um ol/g)

Page 13: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Reactive iron in Florida Bay sediments

-81 .2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Long itude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3

La

titu

de

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Fe (um ol/g)

Page 14: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Salinity of Florida Bay water during sediment sampling By courtesy of Lee & John

Page 15: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

CaCO3-bound total phosphorus by HAc (pH 4) extraction

-81.2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Longitude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3

La

titu

de

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

H AC - TP(um ol/g)

Page 16: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

CaCO3-bound inorganic phosphorus

-81.2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Longitude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3L

ati

tud

e

0

1

2

3

4

5

H AC - IP(um ol/g)

Page 17: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

CaCO3-bound organic phosphorus

-81.2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Longitude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3L

ati

tud

e

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

H Ac - O P(um ol/g)

Page 18: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Detrital phosphorus by HCl extraction

-81.2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Longitude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3

La

titu

de

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

H C l-IP(um ol/g)

Page 19: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Residual refractory organic phosphorus by ashing

-81.2 -81.1 -81.0 -80.9 -80.8 -80.7 -80.6 -80.5 -80.4 -80.3

Longitude

24.8

24.9

25.0

25.1

25.2

25.3

La

titu

de

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Ash-P(um ol/g)

Page 20: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

comparison

Page 21: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Fractions of P in Florida Bay sediment

MgCl28.2%

BD18.6%

HAc44.4%

HCl4.6%

Ash24.3%

Page 22: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Percentage of Different Forms of Sedimentary Phosphorus

Eastern Bay

Fe-bound21.0%

CaCO342.3%

Detrital4.5%

R-Org-P23.7%

Leachable8.5%

Central Bay

Leachable8.4%

Fe-bound20.5%

CaCO342.0%

Detrital3.9%

R-Org-P25.2%

Western Bay

Leachable7.6%

Fe-bound14.4%

CaCO348.6%

Detrital5.4%

R-Org-P24.0%

Page 23: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Summary

• Strong W-E spatial gradient in TSP and every forms of sedimentary P

• CaCO3-bound P accounts 44% of TSP

• Refractory organic P constitutes 24% of TSP

• Iron-bound P accounts 19% of TSP• Exchangeable P accounts 8% of

TSP

Page 24: Spatial Distribution of  Different Forms of  Sedimentary Phosphorus  in Florida Bay:

Sunset

Acknowledgements:

This research was supported by NOAA’s South Florida Ecosystem Restoration, Prediction and Modeling Program

Recent Publications:Zhang, Jia-Zhong, Charles J. Fischer, and Peter B. Ortner, (2004) Potential availability of sedimentary phosphorus to sediment resuspension in Florida Bay, Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 18, GB4008, doi: 10.1029/2004GB002255, 2004. Zhang, J.-Z., J. Chi (2002) Automated analysis of nanomolar concentrations of phosphate in natural waters with liquid waveguide, Environmental Science & Technology, 36(5): 1048-1053.