south ayrshire council local development plan action ... programme.pdf · plan action programme:...

South Ayrshire Council Local DevelopmentPlan Action Programme: IntroductionThe Action Programme is in three parts: -

Part 1: SPG PROGRAMME Outlines all supplementary guidance. The planning guidance contains existing

and proposed supplementary guidance with all actions relating to whether that supplementary guidance is

linked to LDP policies, or whether it is free-standing guidance. The actions are prioritised on the basis of

when the action requires to be carried out. The prioritisation is not an indication of the strategic importance

of the guidance, but an indication of when the action requires to be completed, relative to the production of

the LDP. As such, low priority items do not require to be completed on or shortly after LDP adoption. Higher

priority items may require action (i.e. production of guidance to draft stage) by examination, to identify how

a policy within the LDP may be delivered. The action programme also contains a risk log, which indicates the

risk of failure to deliver the action, likelihood of risk occurrence, and the required remedial action.

Part 2: LDP ACTIONS Contains actions for each LDP policy. This part of the programme also contains risk log

and prioritisation of actions, again, based on when the action needs to be completed; not strategic

significance of the action. A large portion of policies have no specific completion date, as they will be enacted

through the application of LDP policies. These have been identified as ongoing items, and have generally

been allocated as the responsible of the Council, due to its role as planning authority. Other policies and

masterplans have specific actions identified.

Part 3: SITE ACTIONSContains actions for each LDP housing site. This part of the programme also contains

risk log and prioritisation of actions, again, based on when the action needs to be completed; not strategic

significance of the action. Many sites have no specific action, other than delivery of site. These actions have,

therefore, been left without fixed completion dates, as it is largely at the control of the developer as to when

a site is delivered. Timescales were indicated as being delivered in up to 10 years from LDP adoption –

although the Council has confidence that any site identified in the programme can assist to maintain an

effective 5-year supply of housing land. Site constraints have been programmed in, with actions directly

related to overcoming constraints. Responsible persons are not necessarily expected to deliver the entire

site, but may be named because they play a significance consultative role in respect of a particular part of

the action. Additional clarification on stakeholder roles is contained within this part, if necessary.

Action

Ref.

Relevant LDP

Policy LDP Action Priority

Responsible

Person(s) Notes Draft Stage Consultation Adoption Progress at June 2011

Progress at May

2012 Implications of risk occurence

Likelihood

of risk

occurence

Risk contingency/ remedial

action

1

N/A - no direct link

to LDP

Review of dormer windows

SG Low SAC Planning

Dependant on revised permitted

development rights. Post LDP adoption N/A N/A N/A N/A None Low

Review timescales and produce at

earliest opportunity. Review

whether existing guidance is out-

of-date, and requires increased

emphasis and higher priority.

2

LDP Policy: Rural

Housing

Review of housing in

countryside SG High SAC Planning

Summer/Autumn

2012 Autumn 2012

Immediately

following LDP

adoption

(expected

Spring 2014)

Not scheduled to start yet.

No progress. Not Started.

If up-to-date guidance is not

available at or soon after LDP

adoption, this will compromise

the effectiveness and operation

of rural housing policies. Moderate






Existing policies and SALP rural

housing guidance note should be

used as a last option.

3


to LDP

Review of velux roof lights

SG Low SAC Planning

Dependant on revised permitted

development rights. Post LDP adoption N/A N/A N/A N/A None Low






4

LDP Policy: Historic

Environment

Review of historic

environment SG High

SAC Planning;

consultation with HS

Summer/Autumn

2012 Autumn 2012

Immediately

following LDP

adoption

(expected

Spring 2014)







of historic environment policies. Moderate






Existing policiesshould be used as

a last option.

5


Environment

Review of replacement

windows in LB's/CA's SG High

SAC Planning;


Policy content broadly to remain as

existing; SG to be updated to reflect

procedures.

Summer/Autumn

2012 Autumn 2012

Immediately

following LDP

adoption

(expected

Spring 2014)













SHEP should be used as a last

option.

6


to LDP

Review of Supplementary

Guidance: Satellite Receiver

Dishes Low SAC Planning

Existing guidance in place. May

benefit from review. Post LDP adoption N/A N/A N/A N/A None Low






7


to LDP Review of HMO SG Low SAC Planning Complete Post LDP adoption N/A N/A N/A N/A None Low






8


to LDP

Review of control of

sunshades and canopies on

commercial frontages SG Low SAC Planning Post LDP adoption N/A N/A N/A N/A None Low






Milestones

LDP Action Programme: Supplementary Guidance Actions

Risk Log

9


to LDP

Supplementary Guidance:

Shopfront Security Low SAC Planning Post LDP adoption N/A N/A N/A N/A None Low






10


Environment

Review of window

alterations policy guidelines

leaflet High

SAC Planning;


Future of leaflet to be considered as

part of formal SPG (as above).

Summer/Autumn

2012 Autumn 2012

Immediately

following LDP

adoption

(expected

Spring 2014)













SHEP should be used as a last

option.

11

LDP Policy:

Development

Opportunities

Review of development

opportunities High SAC Planning

Future development opportunities

to be identified for inclusion in LDP

For proposed LDP

Consultation

Alongside LDP

Consultation

Alongside LDP

Consultation

(expected

August 2012)

Significant amount of work

has been completed, under

the site selection process

for LDP. Due for completion

before Autumn 2011. Not Started.

If development opportunity sites

are not identified by consultation

on proposed LDP, proposed uses

may be challenged at

examination

Use existing development

opportunities brochure, for

remaining opportunities.

12


to LDP


Wildlife Strategy Low AJPU Spring 2012 Summer 2012 Autumn 2012


No progress. ? ?

13

LDP Policy: Wind

Energy


Wind Farms: Addendum to

Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan

Technical Report High

SAC Planning and

AJPU

A review of the document is

necessary prior to the publication of

the Proposed LDP, to determine if

further, more significant changes

require to be made to that

document.

SEPA consultation advses that

review should consider SEPA

guidance on impact on peat

resources.

Summer/Autumn

2012 TBC TBC







of wind energy policy. Moderate






Existing standards should be used

as a last option.

14

LDP Policy:

Affordable Housing

and LDP Policy:

Delivering

Infrastructure

Review affordable housing

SG High

SAC Planning and

Housing

Existing policy to be updated as set

out in existing MIR. It should be

noted that the inclusion of an

education infrastructure SG does

not imply that education faciltiies

are not the only infrastructure

services required for a site. The

programme indicated that work on

an education SG requires to be

undertaken because, currently, no

such SG exists.

Summer/Autumn

2012 Jan-12

Immediately

following LDP

adoption

(expected

Spring 2014)







of housing policies and collection

methods for contributions. Moderate







as a last option.

15

LDP Policy:

Residential

Development

within Settlements,

Release sites and

Windfall Sites.

Prepare residential amenity

standards SG High SAC Planning

Summer/Autumn

2012 Autumn 2012

Immediately

following LDP

adoption

(expected

Spring 2014)






the assessment of applications

for residential and householder

development. Low


as a last option.

16

LDP Policy: Open

Space Review open space SG Low

SAC Planning,

Sustainable

Development and

Parks Complete N/A N/A N/A Complete Complete N/A Low






17

LDP Policy:

Delivering

Infrastructure

Preparation of Education

Contributions SG High

SAC Planning and

Education

Required by LDP adoption to avoid

policy void. Strategic Direction must

be set prior to proposed plan.

Summer/Autumn

2012 Jan-12

Immediately

following LDP

adoption

(expected

Spring 2014)

Minimal progress. Inital

consultation meeting with

Education Service;

however, the Proposed LDP

must precede the

preparation of this SPG. Not Started.

If policy is not drafted by

adoption, there will be no

standard method of collecting

contributions. Moderate

Policies must at least be

implementable as a draft.

Low: SPG

completion to

draft or adoption

does not need to

follow imminently

after LDP

adoption.

Medium: SPG

should be adopted

shortly after LDP

adoption. Should

at least be

completed to

draft.High: SPG ideally

to be progressed

to draft before the

LDP can be

submitted to

DPEA for

Action Ref. Relevant LDP Policy LDP Action Priority

Responsible

Person(s) Notes

Progress at

June 2011

Progress at May

2012

Implications of risk

occurence

Likelihood of

risk occurence

Risk contingency/

remedial action

Strategic Policy

18

LDP Policy: Spatial

Strategy

Multiple actions as expressed

more fully in LDP policies Low

Head of

Planning/

Regulatory

Panel/LRB None. N/A N/A Failure of LDP strategy Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

19

LDP Policy:

Greenbelt

Planning decisions must be

taken in line with this policy Low

Head of

Planning/

Regulatory

Panel/LRB None. N/A N/A

Failure of greenbelt policy,

which could result in harm

to the high value rural

landsacpe and the growth

stratgey for the main

urban area within South

Ayrshire. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

20

LDP Policy: The

Coast



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Harmful impacts to the

coast and prominent

adverse impacts on the

coastal areas of South

Ayrshire. Potential harm to

the CSGN implementation. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

21

LDP Policy:

Sustainable

Development



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


harmful impacts on the

character and amenity of

the natural and built

environment. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

N/A

LDP Policy:

Delivering

Infrastructure

Produce a SG on Developer

contributions - Education,

Affordable Housing and Open

SpaceEconomic

Development

22 LDP Policy: Tourism



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Failure to capitalise on

tourism opportunities.

New tourism development

being directed to

inaprpopraite locations. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

23

LDP Policy: Business

& Industry

Preparation of Industrial and

Employment Land Supply

Report and maintenance of

industrial land supply. High

South Ayrshire

Council Complete study N/A

Draft land supply

complete. Requires

editorial work.

If supply is not accurate

and up-to-date, land

supply and allocations may

be challenged at

examination stage.

Direction of policy may be

affected by challenge if not

complete. High

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

Identification of

additional

industrial land.

24

LDP Policy: Glasgow

Prestwick Airport



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Failure of policy would

undermine the airport,

which is one of the key

economic assets for South

Ayrshire. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

LDP Action Programme: LDP Policy Actions

Risk Log

SEE SPG ACTIONS 14, 16 & 17

Ongoing action.

Due date for completion

Complete by August 2012; review

annually.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

25

LDP Policy: Newton-

on-Ayr

Prepare masterplan for

Newton-on-Ayr. Moderate

SAC/ Port

Authority

Masterplan for Ayr Port

completed N/A None.

Risk that before

masterplan completion,

development of the area is

not co-ordinated to ensure

best fit for varying uses,

and implications for

amenity impact. Moderate

26

LDP Policy:

Heathfield



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk that industrial

development at Heathfield

is displaced or lost. Risk

that Heathfield becomes

open out-of-centre retail

operation, undermining

town centre. Moderate

27

LDP Policy: Office

Development



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk that office

development isn't

effectively guided to

preferred areas. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

28 LDP Policy: Ports



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk that role of ports is

undermined: the major

ports in terms of their

economic role, and the

existence of smaller ports. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

N/A

LDP Policy:

Development

Opportunities

Preparation of list of

development opportunities,

indicating preferred uses for

opp. sites.

29

LDP Policy: Galloway

and Southern

Ayrshire Biosphere



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk that inappropraite

development harms the

environmental quality of

biospehere. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

Communities

30

LDP Policy: General

Retail



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk that town centre is

undermined and declines

as retail centre. Growth of

out-of-centre retailing. Moderate

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

31

LDP Policy: Town

Centres



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk that town centre is

undermined and declines

as retail centre. Growth of

out-of-centre retailing. Moderate

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

32

LDP Policy: Local

Centres & Small

Settlement Town

Centres



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk of loss of local retail

amenities. Moderate

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

33

LDP Policy:

Maintenance and

Protection of an

Effective Housing

Land Supply

Maintain an effective 5 year

residential land supply and

annually review effective

supply High

SAC/ Private

Sector

Site allocated are developed

out over plan period N/A

2011 & 2012

reviews currently

underway

Risk that if 2011 and 2012

figures do not match,

housing supply could be

too high or low; and

therefore LDP may be

challengable at

examination. High

Urgent review of

policy, monitoring

of appeal decisions

and effectiveness

of housing sites.

Potentially allocate

additional sites to

make up any

SEE SPG ACTION 11

Ongoing action.

For LDP adoption, or soon after.

Estimated December 2013.

Continuous; annual review.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

34

LDP Policy:

Residential Policy

within Settlements,

Release Sites and

Windfall Sites



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk that new residential

development is not of an

adequate amenity or

design standard. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

N/A

LDP Policy: Rural

Housing Prepare SG on Rural Housing

N/A

LDP Policy:

Affordable Housing Prepare new SG

35

LDP Policy: Gypsy

and traveller

Accommodation



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk of lack of provision of

sites, and use of non-

planned sites. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

36

LDP Policy:

Telecommunications



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory

Panel/LRB None. N/A N/A Minimal risk. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

37

LDP Policy: Open

Space



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Impact could include loss

of valued open spaces and

associated facilities. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

38

LDP Policy: Belleisle

& Rozelle Prepare Masterplan Moderate

SAC - Children

& Community

Directorate;

planning;

roads;parks

services

Regeneration of Belleisle

Park and Restoration of

Listed Buildings Completion

of Masterplan and adoption

as SG N/A N/A

Potential deterioration of

open space and historic

building, particularly at

Belleisle. Moderate

Review timescales

for production of

masterplan;

continue to apply

relevant LDP

policies.

39

LDP Policy: Craigie

Estate Prepare Masterplan Low

Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk to the project of the

relocation of Ayr Academy. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

40

LDP Policy:

Community Facilities



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Potential loss of important

community facilities. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

41TO BE

COMPLETE

D

FOLLOWIN

G

CONSULTAT

ION Girvan Harbour side

Development Brief to be

prepared to Project to include

multi-faceted community

facility.

Moderate

SAC/ Children

& Community

Directorate/

Local

Community

Preparation of a

development brief N/A

Girvan community

charrette held,

outcome report

prepared

If masterplan not

completed, there could be

land-use difficulties at

planning application stage;

development may not be

co-ordinated. Moderate

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

Environment &

Climate Change N/A

SEE SPG ACTION 2

SEE SPG ACTION 14

Ongoing action.

Construction to begin on multi-

faceted facility in December 2012



Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

42

LDP Policy:

Landscape Quality



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk that landscape

character and quality of

South Ayrshire is harmed

by development. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

43

LDP Policy:

Landscape

Protection



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk that landscape

character and quality of

South Ayrshire is harmed

by development. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

44

LDP Policy:

Woodland &

Forestry

Adoption of Ayrshire & Arran

Woodland Strategy Low AJPU

1. Visual improvement of

commercial forest from out

with 2. Improvement in

biodiversity N/A

? - seek update from

AJPU ? - seek input from AJPU Moderate

45

LDP Policy: Tree

Preservation



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk of loss of important

trees/ treebelts. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

46

LDP Policy: Central

Scotland Green

Networks



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory

Panel/LRB None. N/A N/A Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

47

LDP Policy: Water

Environment



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Harmful impacts of water

environment. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

48

LDP Policy: Flooding

& Development



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Risk that flooding is not

properly accounted for in

new development. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

49

LDP Policy:

Agricultural Land



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Loss of prime quality

agricultural land. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

50

LDP Policy: Air,

Noise and Light

Pollution



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Adverse impact on

amenity. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

51

LDP Policy: Minerals

& Aggregates



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Innappropraite extratcion

of minerals, resulting in

landsacpe harm and

adverse impact on

communities. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

52

LDP Policy: Low and

Zero Carbon

Buildings



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


New building will not be as

energy efficient as

possible. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

? - seek update from AJPU

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

53

LDP Policy:

Renewable Energy



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


renewable energy

proposals will be more

difficult to control, in

terms of landsacpe impact. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

N/A

LDP Policy: Wind

Energy

Review current AJSP technical

appendix; undertake

landscape character

assessment.

N/A


Environment Preparation of SG.

56

LDP Policy:

Archaeology



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Loss of archaeological

resources. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

57 LDP Policy: Estates



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


The quality of estates

declines or development

within grounds has

unacceptable impact. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

58

LDP Policy: Natural

Heritage



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Harm to natural heritage

resources. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

59

LDP Policy: Waste

Management



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Lack of guidance on

location of waste

management facilities. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

60

LDP Policy: Dark

Skies

Prepare guidance for lighting

within Dark Sky area and

periphery Low

SAC/EAC/D&GC

/FC

Prepare Guidance (non-

statutorily linked to LDP) on

acceptable lighting

standards within Dark Sky

Park. N/A N/A

Lack of consistency in

dealing with planning

applications for

development in dark sky

park, if guidance is not in

place. Low

Transportation N/A

61

LDP Policy: Land Use

and Transportation



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Wide ranging adverse

transport impacts. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

62

LDP Policy: Rail

Investment

Upgrading of rail stations and

improved and increased rail

infrastructure Moderate

SAC/ Network

Rail/ Prestwick

Airport/Transp

ort Scotland, as

consultee

1. Renovation of Prestwick

airport station, 2)

Completion of railway

platform elongation

programme N/A

Network Rail has

increased the length

of platforms to allow

for the use of longer

trains to service

customer demand.

No indication of

upgrading of GPA

station.

If GPA station is not

improved, it may hinder

aiport growth aspirations. Low

Ongoing action.

SEE SPG ACTIONS 4, 5 & 10



Completion date to be agreed with

Transport Scotland, Network Rail and

Infratil (or future aiport operator).

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

SEE SPG ACTION 13

63

LDP Policy: Strategic

Road Development



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Lack of strategic approach

to trunk road network. Low

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

64

LDP Policy: Public

Transport

Deliver park and ride at Dutch

House Low

SPT/ SAC/

Stagecoach/

Transport

Scotland (as

consultee only)

Delivery dependant on

external agencies. N/A

Park and Ride

scheme at Dutch

House has planning

permission. No

development

commenced.

If park and ride is not

improved, it may hinder

LDP spatial strategy

objectives of good range of

public transport nodes to

increase central belt

connectivity. Low

65

LDP Policy: Freight

Transport



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


Lack of strategic approach

to freight transport

network.

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

66

LDP Policy: Town

Centre Traffic

Management

Introduction of measures to

facilitate accessibility, giving

priority to walking, cycling and

public transport. Application

maximum parking standards. Low

South Ayrshire

Council Roads

Service None. N/A N/A

Lack of sustainable

transport modes,

congestion within town

centre.

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

67

LDP Policy: Outdoor

Public Access and

Core Paths



Head of

Planning/

Regulatory


failure to meet statutory

requirement to produce

core paths plan. Lack of

development of routes.

Planning

applications

determined in line

with policy. Policy

reviews.

Low: Actions

are not

required to

adopt LDP -

action is

ongoing

through policy

implementati

on

Medium: Not

required to

adopt LDP,

but as a

specific

delivery date.High: Require

an action to

be delivered

before the

LDP can be

submitted to

DPEA for

examination.

Ongoing action.

Ongoing action.

TBC

Ongoing action.

Completion date to be agreed with

SPT.

DIA may be required.

Action Ref. Settlement Map Ref. Site Constraints* Site Actions Responsible Person(s)

Person(s)/Authorities with a

Signiciant Consultative Role Timescale for Completion Priority Risk Log•Landscaping and transport proposals

to be submitted with planning

application. •Developer

At stage of planning application.

Within years 1 - 10 of plan

adoption. Low

•Site should incorporate access linkages

for vehilces, pededstrian and cycling. •Developer



adoption. Low

•Development Impact Assessment will

be required to assess impact on drainage

and sewerage system.

•Developer •South Ayrshire Council (Head of

Planning)



adoption. Low •Developer should identify any

archaeological remains on site, in

consultation with WoSAS, prior to any

permission being issued.

•Developer

•South Ayrshire Council (Head of

Planning)

•WoSAS



adoption. Low

•Developer should ensure proposals

include the sensitive re-use of the

existing buildings. •Developer


Planning) (Supervisory Planner

Environment).



adoption. Low

•A DIA may be required to show Nil

Impact from Brownfield site •Developer


Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low

•Transport Scotland indicate transport

appraisal should be undertaken for site. •Developer


Planning)

•Transport Scotland

Prior to submission of LDP to DPEA

for examination. Expected by

December 2012. High

71 AYR 3(Peebles Street)

Separate system of

drainage required, if

possible. A DIA may

be required to show

Nil Impact from

Brownfield site

•A DIA may be required to show Nil

Impact from Brownfield site •Developer


Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low

72 BAL1

Separate system of

drainage required for

the development.

Development Impact

Assessment will be

required. There is a 6"

water main crossing

western area of site.

•Separate system of drainage required

for the development. Development

Impact Assessment will be required. •Developer


Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low

Implications of

risk

occurence/

Likelihood of

risk

occurence/

Risk

contingency/

remedial

action all

shown in

Action 33.70 AYR1

Requirement for

transport appriasal for

site to determine

impact of

development on

Whitletts

r'about.Separate

system of drainage

required, if possible.

A DIA may be required

to show Nil Impact

from Brownfield site

LDP Action Porgramme: Site Actions

Potential drainage and

sewerage issues.

Depending on the

proposed demand and

infrastructure

capacity, a flow and

pressure test may be

required. Surface

water to be kept out

of combined

sewer.DIA may be

required.ANN168

The building is listed.

DIA may be required.

AYR 2 (Holmston

House)69





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low

•Transport appraisal to be undertaken

to determine impact of development on

A77 at Holmston Roundabout •Developer

•South Ayrshire Council(Head of

Planning)




December 2012. High





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low

•Transport Assessment to be

undertaken to determine impact of

development on A77 at Holmston

Roundabout •Developer


Planning)




December 2012. High





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low

•Transport Assessment to be





Planning)




December 2012. High





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low •Transport Assessment to be




•Developer


Planning)




December 2012. High

•Site investigations to be undertaken for

consultation with SEPA to establish if

culvert runs beneath site and whether a

no-development zone is required. •Developer

•Developer


Planning)

•SEPA



adoption. Low





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low



A77 at Holmston Roundabout •Developer


Planning)




December 2012. High

•Development will require to

demonstrate to SEPA that the

wtercourse has been taken account of.

FRA may be required to demonstrate

flood plain has been avoided. •Developer


Planning)

•SEPA



adoption. Low

COY3 As above

As aboveCOY477

76

73 COY1

Whether land is

released for housing

depends on the effect

housing will have on

the Coylton road

network, particularly

the cumulative impact

of development on

Holmston R'about.

74 COY2 As above

75 COY5 As above





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low




no-development zone is required. •Developer

•SEPA



adoption. Low





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low

•Develop site •Developer



adoption. Low

80 DUN1 DIA may be required.





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low

81 DUN2 DIA may be required.





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low




no-development zone is required. •Developer • SEPA



adoption. Low

83 GIR1 DIA may be required.





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low



Impact Assessment may be required to

show nil impact from brownfield site. •Developer


Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low

•Site investigations and remedial works

required for any site contamination •Developer •Environmental Health



adoption. Low




Impact Assessment may be required to

show nil impact from brownfield site. •Developer


Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low

KIRKM1 DIA may be required.

DIA may be required.DUN382


DIA may be required.CRO178

79 DAI1 DIA may be required.




no-development zone is required. •Developer •SEPA



adoption. Low

87 KIR1 DIA may be required.



Impact Assessment will be required.

Capacity of the various PS between

Kirkoswald and Girvan WWTW's will

require to be checked. •Developer


Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low



A77 at existing junctions on south of

A77. •Developer


Planning)




December 2012. High




FRA may be required to demonstrate •Developer


Planning)

•SEPA



adoption. Low





Planning)

•Scottish Water





development on A77 at existing

junctions on south of A77. •Developer


Planning)




December 2012. High





•Developer


Planning)

•SEPA



adoption. Low





Planning)

•Scottish Water





development on A77 at existing

junctions on south of A77. •Developer

•Developer


Planning)




December 2012. High






Planning)

•SEPA



adoption. Low





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low

MAYB2 As above.

89 MAYB3 As above.

90 MAYB1 As above.

86 KIRKM1 DIA may be required.

88 MAYB4

Whether land is

released depends on

the effect housing will

have on the Maybole

road network and the

cumulative impacts of

development on the

existing junctions on

the south side of A77,

through Maybole.DIA

may be required.



A77 at existing junctions on south of

A77. •Developer


Planning)




December 2012. High




FRA may be required to demonstrate

flood plain has been avoided. •Developer


Planning)

•SEPA



adoption. Low

92 MIN1 DIA may be required.





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low

93 MIN2 DIA may be required.





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low



Impact Assessment will be required; and

that brownfield site will have Nil impact. •Developer


Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low Masterplan to be prepared for the site

to

•ensure built heritage resources are not

harmed by any development;

•to ensure transport implications of site

development can be dealt with;

•and to ensure integration of the site

with the existing settlement can be

achieved.

•A transport appraisal must be

undertaken to determine implications of

development on trunk road network,

and, where necessary, transport

interventions must be provided by the

developer. •Developer


Planning)


•Historic Scotland High

•Depending on numbers of units a WIA

may be required. No Drainage in close

proximity to this development site. •Developer


Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low •Develop site

•consideration should be taken to how

this watercourse is treated within the

development proposals. •Developer •SEPA



adoption. Low





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low

95 STA1 DIA may be required.

SYM1

This site will not be

developed until

Transport Scotland is

satisfied that the

planned

improvements to the

A77 between Bogend

Toll and Dutch House

roundabout have

been completed. DIA

may be required.

91 MAYB2 As above.

94 MON1

Whether land is

released depends on

the effect housing will

have on the road

network (particularly

Dutch House R'about),

and a master plan

being prepared for the

site showing that its

development will not

harm heritage

resources within the

site or the quality of

the landscape or value

of the area, while

making sure the

development can fit in

with the existing

settlement.DIA may

be required.

•Site cannot be developed until A77

(between Bogend Toll and Dutch House)

as been upgraded by TS

•Developer

•Transport Scotland Completed by 2014 Medium





Planning)

•Scottish Water



adoption. Low •Develop site

•a basic Flood Risk Assessment should

identify the areas which are suitable for

development •Developer •SEPA



adoption. Low

* Site constraints can

include issues with

sewerage and water

capacity, as identified

by Scottish Water;

even though Scottish

Water does not

consider lack of

capacity to be a

development

constraint.

Low: Actions

associated with

delivery of the

site are not

required to

adopt LDP Medium: Not

required to

adopt LDP, but

as a specific

delivery date.

High: Require an

action to be

delivered before

the LDP can be

submitted to

DPEA for

examination.

97 TAR1

FRA required.DIA may

be required.

96 SYM1

This site will not be

developed until

Transport Scotland is

satisfied that the

planned

improvements to the

A77 between Bogend

Toll and Dutch House

roundabout have

been completed. DIA

may be required.

south ayrshire council local development plan action ... programme.pdf · plan action programme:...

Documents