soil manual
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluation of soil parameters.
By
Mr.Shashank Chakraborty
IIIrd year Department of Civil Engineering
Jalpaiguri Government Engineering College Jalpaiguri, West Bengal
Guided By
Dr.Biswajit Paul,
Environment science and Engineering,
Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad. Date: June-July, 2015
2
Table of Contents
Introduction 4
interpretation of parameters 13
Soil parameters 14
Experiment 22
Specific gravity 22
Porosity 23
Grain size analysis 24
Liquid limit plastic limit 28
Water content- dry density relation 33
Direct shear test 37
Conclusion 40
Bibliography 41
3
Acknowledgements
I would take this opportunity to thank the Principal, Jalpaiguri Government Engineering
College, Jalpaiguri (W.B) Professor J. Jhampati for providing me the opportunity to work
in this esteemed institution.
My, Head of the Department, department of Civil engineering, Professor Utpal Kumar
Mondol, for inspiring me to work in the field of engineering.
My guide, Dr. Biswajit Paul, Chair-professor, Department of Environment Science
Engineering, Indian school of mines, Dhanbad (Jharkhand) for his relentless help and
untiring support. His dedication and constant encouragement helped understand
intricacies of the subject.
My parents, their blessings help my fingers move.
Last but not the least, God Almighty.
4
Introduction
Indian school of mines
The Indian School of Mines (ISM) is an educational institute of India. It is located in the
Mineral-rich region of India, in the city of Dhanbad. It was established by British Indian Government on the lines of the Royal School of Mines - London, and was formally
opened on 9 December 1926 by Lord Irwin, the then Viceroy of India. What started as
an institution to impart only mining education has now grown into a full-fledged
technical institution having various departments. ISM admits its undergraduate
students through JEE Advanced (previously IIT-JEE) which is jointly conducted by IITs
and ISM.
Indian School of Mines has 18 academic departments covering Engineering ,Applied Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences and Management programs with a strong emphasis on scientific and technological education and research in the areas of Earth Sciences. The school has produced many pioneers of the Mining and Oil Industry, including Padma Bhushan awardees.
The McPherson Committee formed by Government of British India, recommended the establishment of an institution for imparting education in the fields of Mining and Geology, whose report, submitted in 1920, formed the main basis for establishment of the Indian School of Mines at Dhanbad, on 9 December 1926.
The institute initially offered courses in Mining Engineering, Applied Geology, Applied Physics, Applied Chemistry and Applied Mathematics. In 1957, the institute began offering Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics. Up to 1967 it was a pure government institute where the faculties were recruited through UPSC.
The all round achievement by the graduates of Indian School of Mines in nation building was duly recognized and the School was granted university status by the University Grants Commission under the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 in 1967. Later courses in Mining Machinery Engineering and Mineral Engineering were started in 1975 and 1976 respectively. It was among the few institutes to start courses in Industrial Engineering and Management (in 1977), to cater to the needs of industries like metallurgy, mining and manufacturing.
In 2006, ISM added 14 new courses, prominent among them being Electrical Engineering and a course in Environmental Engineering in the undergraduate
5
curriculum. From 2006, ISM also started offering Integrated Master of Science (Int. M.Sc) in Applied Physics, Applied Chemistry and Mathematics & Computing, and Integrated Master of Science and Technology (Int. M.Sc Tech) courses for Applied Geology and Applied Geophysics. In 2011 ISM offered a B.Tech programme in Chemical Engineering. The institute introduced Civil Engineering in 2013 and Engineering Physics in 2014.
Departments and centres
ISM has the following Departments and Centres:
Engineering
Department of Chemical Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Department of Electrical Engineering
Department of Electronics Engineering
Department of Environmental Engineering
Department of Fuel and Mineral Engineering
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Department of Mining Engineering
Department of Mining Machinery Engineering
Department of Petroleum Engineering
Applied Sciences
Department of Applied Chemistry
Department of Applied Geology
Department of Applied Geophysics
Department of Applied Mathematics
Department of Applied Physics
Social Sciences
Department of Humanities and Social Science
Business
Department of Management Studies (Formerly Industrial Engineering & Management)
6
Centres
Centre of Mining Environment
Computer Centre
Center for Renewable Energy
Center of Societal Mission
Research Centers
An eight storey Central Research Facility is being set up at ISM as a Centre of National Importance. It is most likely to have an international accreditation.
Extension Centre in Kolkata
And an upcoming extension in New Delhi
An extension centre of ISM has been established in Salt Lake City, Kolkata, for promoting closer interaction with the industries.
CENTRE OF MINING ENVIRONMENT (CME): A Centre of Excellence of MOEF/ GOI
About the Center
A unique Centre of its kind ever since its establishment in 1987 under the sponsorship of
Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt. of India, the Centre has been carrying out
advanced research in Environmental Science and Engineering with special emphasis on
Mining Environment.
The Centre has been conducting various types of Executive Development Programs
since its inception. The Centre has successfully completed two mega World Bank
assisted Projects on Environmental Capacity Building for Coal India Limited and also
build the capacity of Non- coal Mining Sector under World Bank assisted project of
Ministry of Environment and Forests /GOI.
The Centre has developed various modular Executive Development Programs on
Environmental Management in Mining Areas, Environmental Impact Assessment, Water
Management, Land Management, Air and Noise Pollution Management, Noise and
Human Response, Socio-economics and Mitigation and Social Impacts and
Environmental Legislation and its Implications, EIA & Auditing.
The Centre has organised over 100 training programmes with the training of over 1000
in-service personnel and other stakeholders and offers regular training of 1-2-4-6-13
7
weeks duration as per the requirements of the industry. The training program of 13
weeks duration has been recognized as fulfillment of requirement for environmental
cadre of its executives by CIL. The Centre is currently offering programmes as per the
requirement of the industry. It also offers consultancy services to the industry in the
areas of EIA, environmental management, environmental auditing, air and water
pollution control, wastewater management, reclamation of degraded lands, solid waste
management, noise abatement, etc.
The Centre has resulted Manuals, Books and Compilations, which serves the mineral
industry as reference material. The Centre’s Faculty won many laurels which include
National Mineral Award, Bala Tandan and M.L.Rungta Awards (MGMI & MEAI),
Institution of Engineer(s) Gold Medal, Subarna and Sashibhusan Memorial Award,
Bharat Jyoti Award, Michael Madhusudan Award, etc. The Centre assisted the
regulatory agencies (CPCB/MOEF) in developing environmental standards for coal
mining areas, guidelines for dust suppressant chemicals, mining in the forest land and
also preparation of operation Damodar Clean Action Plan. The Centre faculty served
various high level committees of Government of India including MOEF/GOI, BIS, DGMS,
MOC etc. Professor Gurdeep Singh is currently the Member Environmental Expert
Appraisal Committee (Mining) of MOEF/GOI.
ENVIS CENTRE
The Environmental Information System (ENVIS) at Centre of Mining Environment
(CME), Indian School of Mines (ISM), was established in 1991 by the Ministry of
Environment and Forests (MoEF), Government of India, for collection, storage,
retrieval and dissemination of information in the area of mining environment.
Our ENVIS Centre is accessible online since September 14, 2001 with a distinctive
website “http://www.geocities.com/envis_ism” which was launched by Shri
P.V.Jaykrishnan(IAS), Secretary to Government of India, MoEF. This website has
also been provided on NIC platform with a distinctive URL
“http://www.ismenvis.nic.in”.
The website has links to different organizations viz., different ENVIS Centres, Coal
& non-coal Organizations, Central Govt(Ministries) & Apex/Independent
organizations, Mineral rich States, Scientific Institutions, Universities, Organizations
related to Environment and Mining. Centre has provided variety of information in
the website viz., subject area, Best Practices Management, environmental
clearance related to mining, legislation, publications, database, experts, workshop
8
report, important Institutes, environmental awareness, research papers, research
projects, current events, current news, do you know section, equipments, photo
gallery, special lectures including Prof. S.K.Bose Memorial Lectures, query form,
feedback form, etc.
Centre also collected many Reports, Research articles, Proceedings and
Newsletters from various sources. All these hard documents are kept in the ENVIS
library for ready references.
Centre results publications on regular basis and till date 54 Newsletters, 14
Monographs, 9 Books have been published and 7 Compilations of Research
Publications of CME have also been made.
Department of Environment science and engineering
The Department of Environmental Science & Engineering is created out of existing
Centre of Mining Environment ( Established in 1987 as centre of excellence in the field
of mine environment by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India) at
Indian School of Mines in June 2007 with the commencement of a regular B.Tech
program in Environmental Engineering under IIT-JEE (first of its kind offered by any
national institute).
B.Tech. Environmental Engineering covering the following:
• Basic engineering and science subjects.
• Subjects on Air, Water and Soil Quality Monitoring, Assessment and Management,
Socio-economics, Environmental Legislation, EIA, Audit, Environmental Chemistry,
Environmental Ecology & Microbiology, Environmental Geotechnology, Wastewater
Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Fluid Mechanics & Hydraulics, Remote Sensing & GIS, etc.
• Environmental Leadership Projects.
• State of the art facilities for laboratory practical and hands on training.
• To cater the needs of industries: Chemical, Petroleum, Pulp & Paper, Textiles
Industries, Metallurgical, Mining and Allied Industries, Energy sectors, etc.
The Department also offers a regular M.Tech program in Environmental Science and
Engineering (since 1990) apart from Ph.D programs in Environmental Science and
Environmental Science and Engineering disciplines, respectively. It also offers a number
9
of courses at various levels in a number of B.Tech and M.Tech programmes of the
University. Well equipped laboratories and qualified faculty make it an ideal
Department for carrying out academic activities (Teaching, Research, HRD and
Consultancy). The Centre now functions within the Department of Environmental
Science & Engineering.
INFRASTRUCTURE
The Department has following well equipped laboratories for environmental
monitoring, assessment and pollution control:
LABORATORIES
Instrumentation Laboratory
Spectrophotometer (UV-VIS-IR, Shimadzu UV-256). Gas Chromatograph
AAS – GBC Avanta & GBC-902 including Graphite Furnace GBC GF 3000;
Mercury Analyser (MA 5800E)
Particle Size Analyser (CILAS/1064 liquid/dry, USA), laser based attached with
online image capturing facilities.
TCLP Apparatus including Zero Head Space Extractor, Dispensing Pressure Vessels,
Rotary Agitator & Vacuum Pressure Pump(Millipore)
Soil Quality & Soil Mechanics Laboratory
Field Kits for Water Holding Capacity, Infiltration Rate etc.
Sieve shaker, Muffle furnace;
pH & Conductivity Meters, Atterburg Limit Apparatus
Cone Penetrometer, Infra-red Moisture Meter
Triaxial Test Apparatus (AIMIL Digi Tritest), Permeameter (Falling & Constant head)
Consolidation Test Setup (AIMIL)
Hydrometer apparatus (SHIVALIK FHP motor)
CBR & Proctor Compaction Apparatus (Hydraulic and Engg. Instrument(HEICO))
Relative Density Apparatus,
Sedimentation Test Setup,
De-airing Apparatus (AIMIL).
Water Chemistry Laboratory
pH Meter with combined glass-calomel electrode (Cyber Scan 510, MEPC);
TDS/Conductivity Meter (Cyber Scan 200, MERCK);
Spectrophotometer (Spectroquant, NOVA 60, MERCK;
Flame Photometer (Microprocessor based, Model 128);
10
COD Meter (Spectroquant, TR 320 MERCK) (148°C);
Turbidity Meter (MERC, Turbiquant 3000T; 0-1000 NTU);
Immersion Thermostat (LAUDA, E100) – Bath/Circulation Thermostats
BOD Incubators;COD Reflux Units;Double Distillation Units.
Environmental Microbiology Lab
Continuous Weather Monitoring Station (Envirotech WM-300) – 1 no;
Mechanical Wind Recorder (Wilh Lambercht Gmbtt Gottingen Type-1482) – 3 nos;
Raingauge
Micrometeorological Lab
Universal Trinocular Research Microscope (OLYMPUS, BX60) – Digital Camera with
online image capturing & analysis, Micro Image lite 4.0
Trinocular Stereozoom Microscope (LEICA, 56D, 6.3:1) – Cold light illumination
system, Leica CLS 150 X
Millipore Membrane filtration for Coliform Organisms, Chlorophyl content meter
Colony Counter (Electronic); Laminar Flow Chamber (horizontal)
Leaf Area Meter (Systronics), Research Centrifuge (REMI R24)
Autoclave, ph & EC meter, Student Binocular Micrscope (NIKON) – 10Nos
Student Stereozoom Microscope – 10 Nos (LEICA)
Land Use & Hydrogeology Lab
Stereoscopic Microscope
Ground truth Radiometer
Optical Pentograph with 5x magnification, Clinometer, Rotameter
Liquid Permeameter (Ruska Haustan)
Electronic Digital Planimeter, Automatic Water Level Recorder.
AQUA CHEM and Aquifer Pro Software’s
Noise Quality Monitoring Lab
Modular Precision Sound Level Meter with octave filter set (Bruel & Kjaer)
Sound Level Meter (CRL-703A, Cirrus)
Modular Sound Analyzer (Bruel & Kjaer)
Noise Dose Meter (Bruel & Kjaer,)
Dosimeter (CEL 420), Audiometer (AP 251, Alfred Peters Ltd)
Radiation Lab
Alpha – Counter (Nucleonix, AP165)
Beta- Counter (Nucleonix, Minibin, MB 403)
Lead Chamber (Nucleonix, Minibin, MB 403)
11
Radon Bubblers (Polltech Instruments)
Radiation Survey Meter (Nucleonix, UR705)
Nal (T1) Detector (International Environment, 4K MCA with software 127A102/5A)
Radon Counter (Polltech Instruments, PS1-PCS1)
Lucas Cell (Polltech Instruments, PS1-RCD1)
Radioactive Standards (Nucleonix)
Fluid Mechanics Lab
Venturimeter, Orificemeter, Bernoullie’s Apparatus
Reynold’s Apparatus Pitot Tube, Display Model of Centrifugal Pump
Air Pollution Lab
High Volume Air Sampler & Respirable Dust Sampler (Envirotech)
Real Time Aerosol Monitor (RAM-1), Gravimetric Dust Sampler
Cascade Impacter (Sera Anderson), Fume Hood Chamber
Personal Dust Sampler (Envirotech), Stack Monitoring kit (Envirotech)
HVS Calibration kit (Envirotech)
Green House Gas Monitor , Portable CO Monitor (ENDEE)
Auto Exhaust Monitors for Diesel & Retrol Driven Vehicles (CO & HC)
Wastewater Engg. Lab
SBR, UASB, Hybrid and ASP Reactors,
Temperature Controlled Incubator cum Shaker
High Speed Refrigerated Centrifuge
Digesdhal Apparatus , COD Reactor, Stirrers
Soxhlet Extraction Assembly , Microprocessor based Muffle Furnace
UV-Visible Spectrophotometer , Gas Chromatograph &Vacuum Filtration Unit
Weather Station
The Department has an automatic weather station to provide the weather related
information (Max. Min. Temp, R.H, Wind Speed and Direction, Rainfall, etc.) to the
public on regular basis.
Land Surveying
Theodolite, Levels, Chain Survey Setup, Ranging rods, Plane Table Survey Setups,
Magnetic compass
Experimental Area
The Department is also equipped to carry out various studies on pilot scale levels
at the experimental plots for its transfer to real world situations.
Computer Laboratory
12
2 No. computer lab with 50 No’s of high end P- IV Computers with LAN & Internet
facility
Remote Sensing & GIS Lab
ERDAS 9.1, A0 Size HP T1100 Plotter, A0 Size HP 4500 Scanner, Recent & Archive
satellite data of different coalfields
The above laboratories are being further strengthened and modernized and a new
GIS/Remote Sensing Laboratory is being developed.
13
Interpretations of soil parameters.
Geotechnical engineering- an Introduction.
For some “soil” means just the top layer of soil, but for an engineer, soil means all
naturally occurring, relatively unconsolidated earth materials- organic or inorganic in
character-that lie above the bed rock. Now, soil can be broken into their constituent
particles relatively easily, such as by agitation in water. But rocks which are the source
of soils are an agglomeration of mineral particles bonded together by strong molecular
force. And this difference is not often clear. Hard soils can be termed as soft rocks or
vice versa.
Geotechnical engineering is a relatively new term which includes both rock and soil
mechanics and engineering portions.
History- During medieval times and even before that, humans had started using soil as a
construction material. There are many evidences of such structures in history. The
pyramids of Egypt, the famous Hanging Gardens built by Babylonian King
Nebuchadnezzar and the Great Wall of China. The Code of Hammurabi (2250 BC)
(Harper, R.F. (1904)) was one of the first attempts to codify building laws. In the Middle
Ages, the European engineers understood the problems associated with soil
settlements. The settlements of Leaning Tower of Pisa (Italy) and the Archbishop’s
Cathedral in Riga are well known examples.
It was early in the 18th century that the first attempts were made to develop some
theories regarding design of foundations and other constructions. Coulomb (1776), a
French scientist formulated classical theory on earth pressures. Concepts of frictional
resistance and cohesive resistance for soil bodies were introduced. Darcy’s law of
permeability and Stokes’ law of velocity of solid particles were developed in 1856.
Mohr’s rupture theory and Mohr’s stress circle developed in 1871 are extensively used
for analysis of shear strength of soils.
The beginning of 20th century witnessed some important developments related to
physical properties of soil. Atterberg (1911), defined consistency limits for cohesive
soils. Pioneering work in this field was done by the Swedish Geotechnical Commission of
the State Railways of Sweden. Though the progress was remarkable from 1900 to 1925.
14
This subject got a boost from its infancy only after 1925, due to the efforts of an
Austrian, Karl Terzhagi. The first publication on this subject was Terzhagi,
Erdbaumechanik (German; translates to soil mechanics in English). Other prominent
contributors were A. Casagrande, Taylor, Peck, Skempton et al.
During the Second World War, the air strips made on different soils possessing different
behavior led to a comprehensive study of soil and rock properties both physical and
chemical. Thus after the War the development of this subject was phenomenal. This fact
is documented in the International Conferences on Soil Mechanics and Foundations.
15
Soil parameters:
Specific gravity – Specific gravity of solids (Gs), is defined as the ratio of the weight of a
given volume of solid to the weight of an equivalent amount of water at 4ºC. Also be
defined as the ratio of the unit weight of solids to that of water.
The value of specific gravity is required in the determination of unit weight of solids,
unit weight of soil, void ratio, porosity, water content and other such parameters.
The value of Gs for majority of soils lies in the range of 2.65-2.80. Lower values are for
coarse grained sands. The presence of organic matter leads to very low values. Soils high
in metal or inorganic content (like mica or iron) return higher values.
Thus from specific gravity of a soil, one can guess up to a certain extent the type of
impurity present in the soil (like in case of higher values, heavy metals can be present,
which can cause ground water pollution or in case of low values, the soil might be high
in humus content). Moreover, void ratio and other important physical characteristics
required for calculation can be determined.
In order to measure the specific gravity of soil in laboratories, an apparatus called
Pycnometer is used.
Water Content- Direct or indirect measures of soil water are needed practically in every
kind of soil study. In the field, the knowledge of the water available for plant growth
requires a direct measure of some index of water content. In the laboratory,
determining and reporting many physical and chemical properties of soil requires the
knowledge of the water content of the soil. In soils work, water content has traditionally
being expressed as a ratio of the mass of water present in the sample to the mass of
sample after it has been dried to a constant weight. It is in fact a pure ratio.
To determine water content, the sample is dried. But a criterion must exist to determine
when a soil is ‘dry’. But in situations where precision or reproducibility is not required, a
precise definition of ‘dry’ is also not required. When high precision is a requirement
16
then a definition for ‘dry’ should exist followed by the method used for the
determination of water content of soil. Traditionally the most frequent definition of dry
being the constant weight of the soil after it has been dried in an oven at a temperature
of 100 -110 ºC.
If water content is desired on a volume basis, the volume from which sample is taken
must be known. A sampling device which takes a known volume of soil (Richard &
Stumpf, 1960) may be used; or the bulk density of the soil, as obtained from
independent masses in the same area.
Taylor (1955), working with Millville loam (which is a relatively uniform soil in so far as
physical and chemical properties are concerned), reported coefficients of variation of 17
and 20% for gravimetric measurements of water content of samples of soil from field
plots under irrigation by furrow and sprinkler methods, respectively. When water is
applied to soil by irrigation or rainfall, the quantity applied is reported as the depth of
water if it were accumulated in a layer. To obtain the volume of water applied to a given
area would require multiplication of the depth by the area, measured in the same
length units. In similar manner, the quantity of water in a soil profile may be reported as
the depth of water present if it were to be accumulated in a layer.
Direct methods are regarded as those methods wherein the water is removed from a
sample using evaporation, leaching or chemical reactions, with the amount removed
being determined. The key problem regarding water content determination in porous
materials has to do with the definition of ‘dry’ state.
Porosity- The structure of soil is related to many important soil physical properties
especially those pertaining to the retention and transport of solutions, gases and heat.
Soil structure can be measured in various ways, but perhaps it is most meaningfully
evaluated through some knowledge of the amount, size, configuration, or distribution of
soil pores. It is often the information concerning these pores, rather than particle size or
17
particle distribution which aids us in characterizing the soil as a medium for plant
growth or other use. Within the soil matrix there exists an array of complex
intraaggregate and interaggregate cavities which vary in amount, shape, size, tortuosity,
continuity. Precise quantification is not possible as their variation is large and nature
complicated. However, with the help of some assumptions, the size distribution of the
larger pores can be made with at least useful accuracy for both laboratories and field
purpose.
An important problem associated with characterization of pores is the unavailability of
standard terminology related to their classification into distinct size ranges. The need for
a standard classification scheme or index has been identified and various attempts
made. Cary and Hayden (1973), suggested the classification of micro-, meso- and
microporosity by Luxmoore (1981), and the responses of Bouma (1981), Beven (1981)
and Skopp (1981). Secondly, another problem arises, identifying pore sizes in terms of
cylindrical diameters. Commonly the equivalent diameters are measured with respect to
capillary pressure and liquid retention. Nitrogen sorption is an established practice for
determination of pore-sizes, but although widely used, method has limitations when it
comes to the wide range of pores that can be present in a sample. Wilkins et al. (1977)0
have described a procedure for direct measurement of soil pores larger than 20 μm by
vacuum impregnation with a fluorescent resin followed by sectioning and
photographing under black light.
The presence of pores in a soil gives an idea of it’s cohesiveness. A soil like clay will be
less porous and more cohesive whereas a soil like sand will be more porous and less
cohesive.
Particle size analysis- it is a measurement of the size distribution of individual particles
in a soil sample. The major features being destruction or dispersion of soil aggregates
into discrete units by chemical, mechanical, or ultrasonic means and the separation of
particles according to size limits by sieving and sedimentation. Soil particles cover an
extreme range of size, varying from stones and rocks to submicron clays. Various
18
systems of soil classifications have been used to define arbitrary limits and ranges of soil
particles.
Unified soil classification system (USCS), originally developed by Arthur Casagrande
(1948) was intended for airfield construction during the Second World War According to
this classification, coarse-grained soils are classified on the basis of their grain-size
distribution and fine grained soils classified on the basis of their plasticity.
AASHTO soil classification system was developed by the US Bureau of Public Roads was
developed, in the late twenties, a classification system called Public Roads
Administration which was specifically meant for road construction. The present AASHTO
(1978) is a revised version of the system in use in 1945.
Indian Standard Soil Classification System (ISSCS) was published in 1959 and revised in
1970. The revision is based on the USCS with the modifications that the fine grained
soils have been subdivided into three categories of low, medium and high
compressibility as against two in USCS.
Compaction- it is a process in which soil is restructured such that in theoretical language
one can say that there are no voids left in the soil. Practically this never happens. But
this process is utilized nonetheless, to improve the effort of soil as building material. The
soil gains get rearranged more closely, thus an increase in density is observed.
Compaction generally leads to increased shear strength values and helps improve
stability and bearing capacity of soil. Also reducing compressibility and permeability of
soil. Detrimental settlements, shrinkages can be avoided or controlled. Smooth wheel
rollers, pneumatic-tyred rollers, vibratory rollers etc. are most commonly used for field
compaction.
Usually the water content in a compacted soil is referenced as OMC. Thus, soils are said
to be compacted dry of optimum or wet of optimum. Permeability of a soil decreases
sharply with increase in water content on the dry of optimum. Minima occurs at or
slightly greater than the OMC. On the wet side of optimum it might show slight chances
19
of increase. The slight increase in permeability is due to the affect of a decrease in the
dry unit weight which is more pronounced than effect of improved orientation.
During compaction of man-made fills in layers, the soil below will be subjected to
normal and shear stresses. These induce pore water pressures. Soil compacted wet of
optimum will have higher pore water pressure compared to soils compacted dry of
optimum which have initially negative pore water pressure. (Punmia, 2001)
Atterberg limits- consistency is a term used to describe the degree of firmness of soil in
a qualitative manner using description such as soft medium, firm, stiff or hard. It
indicates the relative ease with which a soil can be deformed.
Depending on the water content, the four stages of consistency are used to define the
consistency of clayey soil: i) liquid state ii) plastic state iii) semi-solid state iv) solid state.
The boundary water contents at which the soil undergoes a change from one state to
another are called “consistency limits”. In 1911, Atterberg, a Swedish scientist, first
demonstrated the significance of these limits. They are also known as “Atterberg
Limits”.
When a fine grained soil is mixed with a large quantity of water, the resulting
suspension is in a liquid state, offering practically no resistance to the flow. Soil has
virtually no shear strength. If the water content is gradually reduced keeping the
consistency of the sample uniform, a stage comes when it starts offering resistance to
flow. This is the stage when the sample changes from possessing no shearing strength to
infinitesimal shear strength and changes from liquid to plastic state. The boundary
water content between the liquid state and the plastic state is called “liquid limit”.
If the water content is further reduced, the clay sample changes from the plastic state to
the semi-solid state at a boundary water condition called “plastic limit”. In a semi-solid
state, the soil doesn’t have plasticity; it becomes brittle. When pressure is applied, it
simply crumbles.
20
A further reduction in the water content, brings about a state when a decrease in
moisture, the volume of soil doesn’t change. The sample changes from semi-solid to
solid state. The boundary water content is called “shrinkage limit”. Below this the soil
begins to dry up and it is no longer fully saturated.
Shear strength of soil- Capacity of soil to resist shear stress. It is defined as the
maximum value of shear stress that can be mobilized within a soil mass. If this value is
equaled by the shear stress at any plane or surface, failure will occur in the soil because
of movement of a portion of the soil mass along that plane or surface. The soil is then
said to have failed in shear.
Slopes of all kinds, hills, mountains, embankments etc. remain stable only if the shear
strength of the composite material is adequate, otherwise failure takes place.
All stability analysis which normally use the limiting equilibrium approach, require the
determination of limiting shearing resistance. The shear strength is not merely a
property of the material but also a function of magnitude as well as manner of
application of load. Besides, the previous stress history of a natural soil deposit is also a
very significant factor in influencing its shear strength.
21
Experiments
Specific gravity
(IS 2720: Part III : Sec 1&2 :1980)
Aim- To determine specific gravity of soil.
Apparatus-
1. Pycnometer
2. Mixing tub and IS sieves 4.75mm
3. Balance –accurate to 0.01 g
4. Mechanical shaker
Procedure –
1. A sample weighing 200g in case of fine grained soils and 400g in case of coarse
grained soil needs to be prepared in accordance to the standard sample
preparation measures for disturbed soil. This sample should be oven dried and
then stored in an air tight container until required.
2. The weight of the gas jar and ground glass plate should be measured(to the
nearest 0.2g) , this is m1.
3. Approximately 200g of fine grained or coarse grained soil is to be introduced in
the jar and weighed (to the nearest 0.2g), this is m2.
4. Approximately 500ml of water is added within a temperature of ±2 ºC of the
average room temperature during the test.
5. Depending on the type of soil, for coarse grained soils the gas jar and contents
shall be set aside for a period of 4 hours. But for fine grained soil, the gas jar shall
be shaken by hand until the particles are in suspension and then placed in a
shaking apparatus and shaken for a period of 20-30 minutes.
6. Stopper of the jar is removed and inspected, in case of frothing, it is neutralized
by a fine spray of water and if some soil is stuck to the stopper it is washed clean.
Water is then added to within 2mm of the top.
7. Taking care not to trap air under the plate, the gas jar shall be dried carefully and
weighed(to the nearest 0.2g), this is m3.
22
8. Gas jar is emptied, washed thoroughly and filled to the brim with water and
weighed this weight is m4. Results in accordance to IS: 2-1960.
Observation-
Serial no M1 (in g) M2(in g) M3 (in g) M4(in g) Specific gravity
1 500.00 700.00 1100.40 980.00 2.512
2 500.00 700.00 1106.80 980.00 2.732
3 500.00 700.00 1103.60 980.00 2.617
M1=mass of Pycnometer= 500g
M2=mass of Pycnometer + dry soil
M3= mass of Pycnometer +soil+water
M4=mass of Pycnometer + water =980g
Calculation –
Specific gravity= (m2-m1)/[(m4-m1)-(m3-m2)]
Where m1 ,m2 ,m3 ,m4 are specified above.
And the specific gravity of the soil is the average of all the values taken.
Specific gravity =2.62
23
Porosity test
Aim- To determine the void percentage or porosity of a soil.
Apparatus
1. Measuring cylinder.
2. Burette
3. Spatula
Procedure
1. An oven dried soil sample is placed in a measuring cylinder, it’s volume is
measured. This volume is Vs(volume of solid).
2. Distilled water is added to the sample by the means of a burette, drop by drop
until the soil is fully saturated or water starts accumulating over the top surface of
soil.
3. The volume of water used for this purpose is equal to the volume of voids (VV).
4. The process is repeated at least 3 times.
Calculations
The void percentage is calculated as,
e=(Vv/Vs)x100
Observation
Volume of solid (in ml)
Initial level in (ml)
Final level(in ml)
Difference(volume of water)
Void ratio e(%)
1 45 0 22.0 22.0 48.89 2 40 22.0 41.6 19.6 49
3 50 41.6 66.0 24.4 48.80
Void ratio is taken as the average of the 3 values, e =48.90
24
Grain size analysis
(IS 2720: Part IV : 1985)
Objectives
The purpose of this lab is to determine the grain size distribution and texture of an
unconsolidated sediment sample, using a standard sieve set, a Ro-tap automatic shaker
and graphical methods of data analysis. Definitions pertaining to IS 2809-1972 shall be
applicable.
Procedure
1. The sieves to be used are first measured and the weight recorded.
2. A kilogram of the soil sample is taken, sample should be oven-dried (at about 60
C) and free of large twigs, leaves or other organic debris. 25-30 grams of dried
sample is taken, the sample is carefully weighed, and the initial weight is
recorded. The sieve stack with largest mesh spacings on the top, progressively
smaller mesh spacings downward, and a pan on the bottom. Pour the sample in
the top sieve, Ro-tap for 20 minutes, and record the weight retained in each pan.
We will weigh by difference, so first record the weight of the weighing paper or
weighing tray. Then record the gross weight (weighing paper + sand retained)
and finally subtract the paper weight from the gross weight to obtain the net
sample weight retained. Results reported in accordance to IS: 2-1960.
3. Plotting the graph of the percentage soil retained versus the soil particle size
gives the detail of the type of soil. Actual range is given in IS: 1498-1970.
25
Observations
Sieve size (in mm)
Weight of sieve( in g)
Weight of sieve + soil (in g)
Soil retained (in g)
Cumulative weight(in g)
Percentage retained (%)
4.75mm 440 440 00 00 00 2mm 540 625 115 115 21.26
1mm 284 355 71 186 34.38
0.06mm 376 512 136 322 59.52 0.0425mm 257 331 74 396 73.12
0.0212mm 370 430 60 456 84.29 0.0150mm 225 280 55 511 94.45
0.0075mm 309 321 12 523 98.34 Pan 308 326 18 541 100
Calculations
Total weight retained=541 g
Difference between initial weight of sample and total weight retained: 1000-541=459 g
Note:
Gross weight = sieve weight + sample weight
Sieve weight = weight of the empty sieve
Net sample weight = gross weight – sieve weight
Total weight retained = sum of all individual sample weight
Individual weight percent = [(net sample weight)/ (total weight retained)] x 100
Cumulative weight percent = (sum of weights of all previous (larger) sand fractions)
+ (weight of current sand fraction)
26
Figure 1
Discussions
Engineering geologists and engineers use grain size analysis for site evaluations, building
and roadway construction, well construction and to evaluate slope stability. This is the
most common use of grain size analysis. These professionals use the d50 value as a quick
reference for grain size of a sample, and sometimes calculate the mean, median, mode,
sorting or skewness of a sample using the equations from the last section.
Other geologists have attempted to use grain size data to interpret the environment of
deposition for a sample. Some environmental interpretations are obvious: dunes and
beaches contain well sorted sediment, river sediment is moderately sorted, and glacial
sediment is poorly sorted. The problem with environmental interpretations is the
overlap between different environments. Many environments produce sediment with
similar textural properties.
4.75mm, 0
2mm, 21.26
1mm, 34.38
0.06mm, 59.52
0.0425mm, 73.12
0.0212mm, 84.29
0.0150mm, 94.450.0075mm, 98.34
Pan, 100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% retained
27
Sedimentary grains become more rounded as they move farther from the source, so
roundness may also provide environmental information. One complication with this
approach is that different minerals have different resistance to weathering. A quartz
grain may be transported 100’s or 1000’s of kilometers before it becomes rounded,
while a volcanic rock fragment may be rounded within a few kilometers.
28
Liquid limit and plastic limit test for soil
(IS 2720: Part V : 1985)
Aim – Determination of Atterberg Limits (liquid limit and plastic limit). Definitions
pertaining to IS: 2809-1972 shall be applicable.
Apparatus for liquid limit-
1. Casagrande’s apparatus or cone penetrator
2. Spatula
3. Grooving tool (Conforms to IS: 9259-1979)
4. Evaporating dish or petri dish
5. Oven
6. Balance
7. Distilled water
Procedure-
Soil sample preparation- As the sample taken is clayey(cohesive soil), it has been soaked
in water for a period not less than 24 hours before the test can be carried out. In case of
cohesion-less soil like sand, required water can be added such that the soil is in
suspension and the test can be carried out. (obtained in accordance to IS: 2720-1983)
The soil sample is to be remixed thoroughly before the test. A portion of the paste is to
be placed in the cup above the spot where the cup rests on the base, squeezed down
and spread into position with as few strokes as possible of the spatula and at the same
time trimmed to a depth of 1 centimeter at the point of maximum thickness, returning
excess soil to the dish.
A representative slice of the soil shall be taken in a container and it’s moisture content
expressed as a percentage of oven dry weight.
The cup is now fitted and dropped by turning the crank at a rate of 2 revolutions/second
until the two halves of the groove of the soil cake come in contact with bottom of the
groove along a distance of 12 millimeters. The length shall be measured with the means
of a grooving tool or ruler.
29
Now soil sample is to be tested, in each case the number of blows shall be recorded and
the moisture content determined by placing a nominal amount of sample in oven(which
is initially weighed) and the difference in the weights of the wet and the oven dried
sample gives the weight of water in that particular sample of soil.
The test should proceed from drier to wetter condition of the soil. The test may also be
conducted from wetter to drier condition provided drying is achieved by kneading of soil
and not by addition of dry soil.
WL , liquid limit of soil corresponding to 25 drops is taken.
Observations:
Water content, W is given by:
W=[(W2-W3)/(W3-W1)]*100
Soil sample no.
1 2 3 4 5
No of blows 17 21 25 28 32
W1(empty plate)(in g)
40.00 38.00 42.00 53.00 38.00
W2(empty plate +soil)(in g)
55.00 53.00 59.00 68.00 53.00
W3(oven dried soil)(in g)
52.34 49.63 54.21 64.12 50.46
W (water content)(in %)
21.17 28.97 40.95 34.89 19.04
WL=41% (rounded off to the nearest whole no.)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
17 21
30
Figure 2
(rounded off to the nearest whole no.)
25 28 32
no of blows
water content
water content
31
Determination of plastic limit
Aim- To determine the plastic limit of a soil.
Apparatus- It shall conform to IS: 11196-1985.
1. Porcelain evaporating dish
2. Flat glass plate
3. Spatula
4. Palette knife
5. Surface for rolling
6. Air-tight containers
7. Balance
8. Thermostatically heated oven
9. Rod- 3mm in diameter and 10cm in length
Soil sample- Taking the soil earlier prepared for liquid limit test, the soil mass after
addition of water becomes plastic enough to be shaped into a ball.
Procedure-
1. After the soil is rolled into a ball, it is rolled between the fingers and the glass
plate with just sufficient pressure to roll the mass into a thread having a diameter
of 3mm.
2. The soil shall then be kneaded and rolled again. In order to measure if the thread
has a diameter of 3mm a rod having diameter 3mm is provided.
3. This process is continued until the soil can no longer be rolled into a thread, soil
crumbles before reaching a diameter of 3mm. This is considered a satisfactory
end point provided the soil has been rolled into a thread of 3mm in diameter
immediately before.
4. Care should be taken such that due to application of pressure, soil crumbles at
3mm diameter. Few pieces of crumbled soils are collected and their moisture
content determined. (according with IS: 2720 (Part 2)-1973)
32
Observations:
1 2 3 4 5
W1(in g) 40 38 42 53 38
W2(in g) 57 61 66 71 61
W3(in g) 52.33 56.32 60.34 67.47 57.14
W(%) 37.87 25.55 30.86 24.40 20.67
W1 weight of empty dish
W2 weight of dish + soil sample
W3 weight of dish + oven dry sample
Calculations:
Plastic limit WP=average of the water content=27.87%=28% (rounded to the nearest
whole no.)
Plasticity index (IP)= WL-WP= 41-28=13%
Flow index(IF)=( W1-W2)/log10(N2/N1)=7.75
Where W1 and W2 are water content corresponding to liquid limit and N1 and N2 are
corresponding drops.
If W1=21.17 W2=19.04 N1=17 N2=32
Toughness index (IT)=IP/IF =1.678
Liquidity index (IL)= (WO-WP)/IP =8%
Where WO is natural moisture content
WO=average of the water content obtained in liquid limit test=29.04
Consistency index (IC)=(WL-WO)/IP=0.996
33
Determination of water content-dry density relation using light compaction.
(IS 2720: Part VIII :1980)
Objective
To establish a relation between the dry density and water content. Also shows the
properties of soil as a construction material.
Apparatus- Definitions given in IS: 2809-1972 shall be applicable.
1. Cylindrical metal mould with base plate and collar- The cylindrical metal mould
has a diameter of 10 cm and height of 12.73 cm (measured by tape and slide
calipers).
2. Sample extruders
3. Balances-2 balances are required. One sensitive to 1g and other sensitive to
0.01g.
4. Oven- thermostatically heated oven.
5. Container – suitable non-corrodible air tight container to determine the water
content for tests conducted in the laboratory.
6. Steel-straightedge
7. Sieve -4.75mm and 20mm sieves as per IS requirements.
8. Mixing tools- pan, trowel, spatula etc.
9. Metal rammer having a weight of 2.5 kg. (conform to IS: 9198-1979)
Procedure
1. About 5 kg of sieved sample is obtained and weighed.
2. As the soil taken is clayey, distilled water equivalent to 8% of the mass is added to
the entire sample and mixed properly. Then the soil is stored in a air tight
container for a period of 24 hours.
3. The cylindrical mould with the base plate is weighed and its weight noted.
4. The sample is now filled to roughly one-third of the cylindrical mould fitted with
the metal collar, the metal rammer is used to compact the soil with 25 blows.
Care should be taken such that in each blow, the metal rammer is extended to the
full extent that is 31 cm.
34
5. After compacting the one third, sample is added to the cylindrical mould filling it
to two third of the mould. The soil is again compacted by 25 blows of the metal
hammer.
6. Further, soil is added to the mould. Care should be taken such that it does not
exceed the metal collar by 5 cm. This is again compacted by 25 blows of the metal
rammer.
7. After compaction is done, the collar is removed and the excess soil is removed
with the means of a metal straightedge. Then the mould with the soil is weighed.
Some soil sample is collected in a Petri dish (the empty weight is already
measured) and its weight measured. Then the Petri dish is kept in an oven at a
temperature of 110 ºC for a period of 24 hrs. Then its weight is measured and
water content determined. (as in IS: 2720-1973 Part II)
8. To the rest of the sample extra water equivalent to 3% of the soil mass is added
and the process is repeated.
9. In this way 5 readings are taken each having 3% more water than the previous
one.
10. The readings are recorded in the observation table.
Calculation
w=[(W2-W3]/(W3-W1)]x100
Volume of mould = πxD2xH/4=1000 ml
If D=10 cm and H=12.73 cm
Where, bulk density(ϒt ) and dry density (ϒd) is given by,
ϒt=W/V
ϒd=ϒt/(1+w)
Mass of mould is 5459 g or 5.459 kg
Mass of compacted soil= mass of (mould + soil) –mass of mould
35
Observation
Water content table:
1 2 3 4 5
W1 (in g) 40.00 38.00 42 53 38
W2 (in g) 55.00 53.00 57 68 53 W3 (in g) 53.88 51.73 55.52 66.31 51.91
w (in %) 8.10 9.25 10.91 12.65 14.35
Dry density-bulk density table:
1 2 3 4 5
Volume of mould (in ml)
1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Mass of mould (in g)
5459 5459 5459 5459 5459
Mass of (mould +soil )(in g)
7375 7502 7617 7589 7505
Mass of compacted soil (in g)
1916 2043 2158 2130 2046
Bulk density ϒt (g/ml)
1.92 2.04 2.16 2.13 2.05
w (in %) 8.10 9.25 10.91 12.65 14.35
Dry density ϒd (g/ml)
1.78 1.87 1.94 1.89 1.79
36
Figure 3
Thus from Figure 3 it is clear that the optimum moisture content of the soil is
10.91% at a dry density of 1.94 g/ml.
Discussion
The importance of soil compaction can be understood from the fact that in modern
construction, concrete is widely and most commonly used. But this material has a
weakness, it is susceptible to damage from tensile forces. This happens when the soil
is not evenly compacted, thus swelling of soil occurs due to pore pressure and after
drying the soil settles again but due to this upheaval of soil, the concrete structures
develop cracks or can collapse. The most common example of improper soil
compaction being the Leaning Tower of Pisa, Italy.
1.78
1.87
1.94
1.89
1.79
1.7
1.75
1.8
1.85
1.9
1.95
2
8.1 9.25 10.91 12.65 14.35
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
(
%)
ϒd
37
Direct shear test
(IS 2720: Part XIII : 1986)
Aim- Determination of shear strength of soils with maximum particle size of 4.75mm in
undrained, consolidated undrained and consolidated drained condition. Relevant IS:
2809-1972 shall be applicable.
Apparatus – Provisions regarding the requirements for equipment covered in IS: 11229-
1985.
1. Shear box, grid plates, porous stones, base plates, loading pad and water jacket.
2. Loading frame-
a. Vertical stress on sample shall remain vertical and constant during the test and
there shall be arrangement to measure compression.
b. Shear stress or strain can be applied in the dividing plane of the two parts of
the shear box.
c. It should be possible to maintain a constant increase in stress during the test
with arrangement to get different rates of stress increase.
d. In case of strain controlled apparatus the strain rate should remain constant
irrespective of the stress.
e. No vibrations are to be transmitted to the sample during the test and there
shouldn’t be any loss of shear force due to friction between the loading frame
and shear box container assembly.
3. Weights
4. Proving ring
5. Micrometer dial gauges
6. Sample trimmer or core cutter
7. Stop clock
8. Balance
9. Spatula or straightedge
38
Procedure
1. The soil specimen, sand in this case, is confined in a metal box of square
cross section that is split into two horizontal halves. The dimensions of the
box are to be measured.
2. As the sand specimen is dry, perforated plates are not required.
3. Porous stones are placed above and below the specimen which in turn is
placed between 2 metal grid plates.
4. Now the shear box or the metal box is placed in the trolley and the fixing
screws taken out.
5. A vertical load is applied, initially 0.5 kg/cm2, and the box is sheared
gradually.
6. The shear stress is measured by the micrometer dial gauge in the proving
ring, the shear is normally applied at a constant rate of strain.
7. The horizontal displacement is measured by means of another micrometer
gauge.
8. This process is carried repeated 2 times.
The normal stress versus the shear stress at failure graph is plotted. The constant c and
slope ɸ are obtained from the best fit line.
Observation
Normal stress(kg/cm2) Shear stress at failure (kg/cm2)
1 0.5 0.39
2 1.0 0.55 3 1.5 0.77
4 2.0 0.96
39
Figure 4
Thus from figure 4,
Value of c=0.14 kg/cm2
And ɸ=23º.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0.5 1 1.5 2
n
o
r
m
a
l
s
t
r
e
s
s
shear stress
shear stress
40
Conclusion
The soil taken for specific gravity test returned a specific gravity of 2.62 signifying
presence of organic matter. The soil sample taken is silty sand.
Taking the same soil sample, the porosity test is performed which returns a value of
48.90% of voids, thus the soil sample can be stated as porous. But porosity values of soil
like sands are even higher.
Grain size analysis is done on the sample and graphical interpretation leads to
concluding the soil as poorly graded sand.
The shear test performed on the sample gives us a constant c of 0.14, thus indicating the
soil to be sand with granules or some other impurities. The Mohr’s angle is 23º.
Thus the soil sample can be termed as poorly graded silty sand.
41
Bibliography
Atterberg, A. (1911),’Uber die physikalische Bodenunterasuchang, und uber die
Plastizitat der Tone’, Internationale Mitteilugen fur Bodenkunde, Verlag fur
Fachliteratur, Vol.1, Berlin, pp 301-310.
Coulomb, C.A. (1776),’Essai sur une Applications des Regles de Maximis et Minimis a
quelques Problems de Statique Relatifs a l’ Architecture’, Royal Academic des Sciences,
Vol. 7, Paris, pp 125-130.
Darcy, H. (1956), ‘Les Fountaines publiques de la ville de Dijon’, Paris, Victor Dalmount,
Editeur, pp 111-115.
Harper, R.F. (1904),’The Code of Hammurabi, King of Babylon, About 2550B.C.’, Chicago,
University Of Chicago Press, 2nd Edition, pp 90-112.
Lambe, T.W. and Whitman, R.V. (1969),’Soil Mechanics’, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New
York, pp 102-106.
Rankine, W.J.M. (1857),’On the stability of Loose Earth’, Phil. Trans Royal Soc., Vol. 147,
London.
Rao, A.S.R. and Ranjan, G. (2013),’Principles of soil mechanics’, pp- 80-157.
Terzaghi, K. (1925),’Erdbaumechanik auf Bodenphysikalischer Grundlage’, Leipzig and
Wein, Franz Delicke, pp 112-114.