social psychology group project 2 report

9
FOUNDATION IN NATURAL AND BUILT ENVIRONMENTS SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY ASSIGNMENT 3 REPORT GROUP MEMBERS: Deenie H’yatt 0319719 Chong Jia Yi 0320869 Zoe Low Li Mien 0319444 Abdullah Mamode 0319562 Ee Yun Shan 0319990 TUTORIAL GROUP: Monday, 9am11am. SUBMISSION DATE: 8th June 2015

Upload: forestedtiger

Post on 12-Aug-2015

17 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Social Psychology Group Project 2 Report

FOUNDATION IN NATURAL AND BUILT ENVIRONMENTS SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY ASSIGNMENT 3 REPORT

GROUP MEMBERS: Deenie H’yatt 0319719

Chong Jia Yi 0320869 Zoe Low Li Mien 0319444 Abdullah Mamode 0319562 Ee Yun Shan 0319990

TUTORIAL GROUP: Monday, 9am­11am. SUBMISSION DATE: 8th June 2015

Page 2: Social Psychology Group Project 2 Report

CONTENTS 1. Introduction

2. Discussion

2.1 Our chosen concepts and definitions 2.2 The script 2.3 How do we apply our concepts. 3. References

Page 3: Social Psychology Group Project 2 Report

INTRODUCTION: In this project, we have to choose 5 social psychological concepts and apply them to a story in a form of a video clip. Before we began making the story, we chose our 5 concepts first through our discussions. Individually we selected them based on our knowledge and combine together. The concepts we have chosen are dispositional attribution, social loafing, stereotyping, optimistic bias and operant conditioning. From then on, we moved to produce a story from the concepts we have discussed.

Page 4: Social Psychology Group Project 2 Report

2. Discussion 2.1 OUR CHOSEN CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONS 1. Situational Attribution Situational Attribution (External Attribution) is the attributes of your behaviour to the external or circumstantial causes. It refers to understanding an event or behaviour as being caused by the situation that the individual is in. Making a situational attribution means that we believe a person's behaviour is best understood as a result of his or her circumstances. We might think that any sensible person would behave similarly in the same situation. 2. Social Loafing The definition of social loafing is the tendency of certain members of a group to get by with less effort than what they would have put when working alone. Its two common manifestations are Free­rider effect, where some members do not put in their share of work under the assumption that others' efforts will cover their shortfall, and thus cause Sucker effect, where the other who is the fully performing members lower their efforts in response to the free­riders' attitude. 3. Stereotyping and Stereotype threat The definition of stereotype is a fixed, overgeneralized belief about a particular group or class of people. By stereotyping we infer that a person has a whole range of characteristics and abilities that we assume all members of that group have. Most stereotypes probably tend to convey a negative impression. It make us ignore differences between individuals; therefore we think things about people that might not be true. However, it enables us to respond rapidly to situations because we may have had a similar experience before as well as simplify our social world since they reduce the amount of processing we have to do when we meet a new person. Stereotype threat is a situational predicament in which people are or feel themselves to be at risk of confirming negative stereotypes about their social group. The anxiety of confirming a negative stereotype seems to be the driving force behind stereotype threat.

4. Optimistic Bias Optimism bias, originally referred to as unrealistic optimism (Weinstein, 1980), is the tendency of individuals to underestimate the likelihood they will experience adverse events, such as lung cancer or car accidents. As a consequence of this bias, some individuals might disregard precautions that might curb these risks. They might not, for example, wear seatbelts as a driver and for the smokers, they will keep on smoking regardless the situation around them.

Page 5: Social Psychology Group Project 2 Report

5. Negative Reinforcement Reinforcement is an event that strengthens a certain behaviour, which increases the likelihood of it. For a negative’s case, it removes something that causes the person to feel dissatisfied. Think of it as a removal within an event that makes the person feel unhappy about it and will not practice the same specific behaviour again. 2.2 SCRIPT The story is about a group of students who are doing a teamwork assignment given by the lecturer. Our Roles Abdullah: Mr Abdullah Deenie: Deenie Zoe Low: Zoe Chong Jia Yi: Jia Yi Ee Yun Shan: Michelle SCENE 1 The scene sets in a classroom filled with students as Mr Abdullah initiates a project. MR ABDULLAH: All of you will be divided into small groups for the last 2 projects. I do not admire the fact that you choose your own groups. I will set up them up. All of the group members stare at each other. Jia Yi and Michelle started to high­5 each other that they are in the same groups. Michelle starts a small conversation with Jia Yi and look at Deenie and Zoe. MICHELLE; Umm…. I don’t think they are suitable for us to work with them. JIA YI; I agree. I heard Deenie didn’t perform well on group projects, the same applies for Zoe. Zoe starts to look at both of the girls and talks to herself. ZOE; What should I do? How would I collaborate with them? DEENIE; Chill. Jia Yi knows how to draw, Zoe is good at colouring, Michelle knows how to draw as well so I am going to sit here and watch.

Page 6: Social Psychology Group Project 2 Report

SCENE 2 The scene changes to the group members started to meet up for a group discussion and Jia Yi starts assigning everyone. JIA YI; Since both of you didn’t say anything, I am going to divide all of us to do certain parts. MICHELLE; Yes certain task! Both of you will do it. ZOE; Are you sure you can do it? MICHELLE; Of course she can do it. JIA YI IS THE BEST! SCENE 3 After the 1st meeting, the group members meet up again. The 3 girls did most of the work except for Deenie. JIA YI; Ok did you guys do anything. Zoe and Michelle starts to show their papers to her except for Deenie. JIA YI; What about you, Deenie? Deenie starts to shrug. DEENIE; Sorry I don’t have time to do whatever assignment you have given me. JIA YI; Why didn’t you do any work for the past week? I’m also busy with Design, CNC, EPC and so on. Deenie starts to smirk. DEENIE; Chill, Do you know James A.K.A. The slowpoke? He’s the leader for the group B, they didn’t even start on anything yet and we’re moving faster than them. So chill what’s with the rush, we can finish it early. SCENE 4 The scene sets in 2 weeks later when the group meet up again.

Page 7: Social Psychology Group Project 2 Report

DEENIE; Hey guys, we didn’t even start on anything. All we did was just the research on the concepts. Jia Yi and Michelle stare at each other. JIA YI; Do you remember what you said for the last 2 weeks? You said that all of the group are behind and we are one step ahead of them. You told us to relax since we are the only group with the most progress. Now what happen? Deenie keeps quite. MICHELLE; We have tutorial after this, we have nothing to consult. What should we do? SCENE 5 The scenes changes to the classroom with Mr Abdullah walking to the table we are sitting in. MR ABDULLAH; Have you guys done anything so far? There’s a 5 second silence, Mr Abdullah confirming the fact that no one had done anything. MR ABDULLAH; Since you guys have not done anything yet, you have only 2 days to submit your assignment. If you don’t submit your project, you will not have any marks for this subject. There’s an awkward silence occurring. MR ABDULLAH; Ok bye bye. See you next week and I hoped to see your assignment. 2.3 HOW DO WE APPLY THEM IN SCRIPT SCENE 1: Situational Attribution We apply Situational Attribution by showing the girls’ inner thoughts of other members.They think that the members are not very suitable to work, based on what they have heard from the other students. Their thoughts came in from the circumstances of the other members which they knew through their classmates. SCENE 2: Social Loafing Social loafing is applied on the boy who is lazy. When the lecturer allocated the group project to them, the boy thinks that the other members in the group can do the project better. He finds

Page 8: Social Psychology Group Project 2 Report

that the members of his group are good in drawing, colouring and designing, but he doesn’t do anything. This is where he began to put less effort, thinking that the others can cover the lecturer’s expectation of the boy. SCENE 3: Stereotyping and Stereotype threat The Stereotype comes in when Michelle and Zoe started showing their effort with the exception of the boy. The group leader started to think that the boy never does the work at all, like the gender he is from. Whereas the girls does the work better than him. Deenie was reminded of negative stereotype about his gender when their group members are blaming him. This was due to their group’s poor performance and procrastination. The anxiety of confirming a negative stereotype seems to be the driving force behind stereotype threat. That anxiety causes him to perform worse than what he should be. Therefore, he tends to fulfill their expectation on him when self­fulfilling prophecy comes in. SCENE 4: Optimistic Bias The concept is used on the argument between the boy and the girls. When the boy started to ask the girls as their submission day is coming close, the girls referred back to what he said previously. It shows the boy was underestimating the likelihood of consequences, where the bias is shown as a fact. SCENE 5: Negative Reinforcement. Negative reinforcement is exerted onto the lecturer’s warning toward the group’s progress. He stated that if they have not done their work, they will not receive any marks. He purposely said that in order to make them work. Losing their marks is shown that he receives a result of their negative behaviour. 3. REFERENCES Cherry, K. A. (2005). Operant conditioning. [web article]. Retrieved from http://psychology.about.com/od/behavioralpsychology/a/introopcond.htm Cherry, K. A. (2005). What is negative reinforcement? [web article]. Retrieved from http://psychology.about.com/od/operantconditioning/f/negative­reinforcement.htm Kos, J. and Clarke, V. (2001). Is optimistic bias influenced by control or delay? [web article] Retrieved from http://her.oxfordjournals.org/content/16/5/533.long

Page 9: Social Psychology Group Project 2 Report

McLeod, S. (2007). Skinner ­ Operant Conditioning. [webpage] Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/operant­conditioning.html McLeod, S. (2008). Stereotypes. [webpage] Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/katz­braly.html) Moss, S. (2009). Optimism bias. Psychlopedia. Retrieved from http://www.psych­it.com.au/Psychlopedia/article.asp?id=238 Princeton University Department of Psychology. (2004). Case Study Where do stereotypes come from? [webpage]. Retrieved from https://psych.princeton.edu/psychology/research/fiske/case.php SparkNotes. (2015). Learning and Conditioning: Operant Conditioning. [webpage]. Retrieved from http://www.sparknotes.com/psychology/psych101/learning/section2.rhtml