social psychology
DESCRIPTION
Social psychology. No, this is not a guide on how to get a date. Social psychology is concerned with:. Persuasion Obedience Group dynamics Prejudice Culture Formation Stereotyping . Fundamental Attribution Error. Tendency to attribute internal attributes to other people’s behavior - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGYNo, this is not a guide on how to
get a date.
![Page 2: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Social psychology is concerned with:
Persuasion Obedience Group dynamics Prejudice Culture Formation Stereotyping
![Page 3: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Fundamental Attribution Error Tendency to attribute internal attributes to
other people’s behavior Self-serving bias
good things happen to us: internal reasons bad things happen to us: external
Just-world hypothesis Good things happen to good people Bas things happen to bad people
Halo effect Because there is one good thing about a person,
this means that everything is good about him or her
![Page 4: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Asch Study
![Page 5: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Solomon Asch’s Conformity Experiment
75% of participants conformed to the group majority
The larger the group, the larger the majority.
![Page 7: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Milgram
![Page 8: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Milgram’s Findings In the voice feedback condition, 65% of
participants obeyed the Experimenter. One of the obeying participants was a
Holocaust survivor. “Agentic State”
![Page 12: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Zimbardo Prison Experiment
College-aged students randomly assigned to be a guard or a prisoner in a prison simulation.
Meant to be a role play intended to study the psychological effects of incarceration,
Environment became a sadistic prison environment Guards physically and mentally
abused the prisoners and The prisoners became
convinced that they were meant to stay indefinitely.
The experiment shows how easy it is for people to assume their roles and let it become their reality.
![Page 14: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Cognitive Dissonance Festinger & Carlsmith (1959) Boring Task “Tell others that this was fun!” Some paid $20, others paid $1 Those paid $1 rated activity as more enjoyable
than those who were paid $20 Cognitive Dissonance: Discomfort caused by
behavior and belief not being congruent Choice: Live with dissonance, change behavior, or
change belief If behavior is forced, then change in belief is possible
![Page 16: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Groupthink Need for consensus
Results in suppression of dissent “Symptoms”
Illusion of invulnerability Self-censorship Pressure to make dissenters conform Illusion of unanimity
Examples 1986 Challenger Explosion Bay of Pigs Invasion
Kennedy: “How could we have been so stupid? When we saw the wide range of the failures we asked ourselves why it had not been apparent to somebody from the start. I guess you get walled off from reality when you want something to succeed too much”.
![Page 17: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Cialdini’s Principles of Persuasion
Commitment & Consistency We stay loyal to those we make a commitment
Consensus We are more likely persuaded to an idea if we see others
believing in that idea Liking
We like those who are like us Authority
We tend to believe an idea if an authority figure endorses it Scarcity
We must have what is scarce Reciprocation
If you give me something, I feel compelled to give something in return.
![Page 18: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Sherif et al. (1954) Muzafer Sherif took 24
school aged boys and separated them into two groups.
Without being told to, each group formed its own identity (the Rattlers and the Eagles), assigned roles, and hierarchal structure.
When the groups became aware of each other, they insisted on doing competitive games against one another
![Page 19: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Competition The two groups
engaged in a series of competitions. The winning group would win a trophy.
After a few days, the to groups were brought into the camp cafeteria, where excessive name calling resulted.
![Page 20: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Hatred Develops The two groups started
calling each other names.
After a while pranks were played on one another.
An Eagle cabin was broken into by a Rattler and several items were stolen
Signs of hostility, aggression, and hatred were observed in both groups by researchers.
![Page 21: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Creating Harmony Sherif and his colleagues found that
intergroup hostilities could be overcome if both groups worked together to achieve a common goal. The Movie Problem Maryland Referndum on Slavery (1864) Truman Desegregating the Armed Forces
(1947)
![Page 22: Social psychology](https://reader030.vdocuments.site/reader030/viewer/2022033101/568163b2550346895dd4caa7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
How prejudice develops United States: African-Americans and
immigrants provided competition in finding jobs. The greatest hostilities were found during the Great Depression.
Europe: Many bankers throughout Europe were Jewish. Having strong influence over the economy, many viewed Jews as competitors.