small bore sewers - afd-pseau - world water week 2013 - stockholm
TRANSCRIPT
SMALL-BORE SEWERSMain learnings on a study madein Africa, Asia and Latin America
Cécile Denormandie, AFDDenis Désille, pS-EauJean-Marie Ily, pS-EauChristophe Le Jallé, pS-Eau
Aims of our study
• Identifying strengths and weaknesses, regarding technical, financial and management issues
• When small-bore sewers are relevant?
• Which recommandations for implementation?
© WSP
But most of them face difficulties
• Technical issues: gradients are too low, wastewater leakage, poor-quality concrete, etc.
• Financial issues: recurring operating costs are under-estimated, too few connexions , low collection rate of the sanitation fee , etc.
• Management issues: O&M skills are missing, operator is not clearly identified
• Institutional issues: no contract, no monitoring, no control
Main learning #1Feasability is very restrictive
• Money is needed (SBS is more expensive than onsite sanitation)
• Other public services must be very efficient (solid wastes, rainwater, access to drinking water, land property…)
• A location for the treatment plant is fundamental (except if the SBS is connected to a conventional sewer)
• Users demand for SBS has to be confirmed
Main learning #2Building SBS is NOT the main issue
There used to be mistakes in design and implementation :
- slope is the main mistake !
- Pipes level higher than householdsanitation facilities level
- Waterproofness
- Etc.
BUT the main issue is management…
Main learning #3Small sewer does not mean small management
• Sewer operator skills required:– Responsive technical management
(4 levels of O&M)– Financial management capacities
(tariff, invoices, balance of the service, etc.)
– Marketing skills (to rise up numberof connexions)
– Social abilities (SBS is very sensitive to bad users practices)
• A monitoring system, with control and sanctions
Conclusions
• Is SBS a proper solution to provide sustainable sanitation services in pro-poor contexts?
• Prefer management delegated to professional authorities / companies instead of CBOs
• Attention and resources should be dedicated to support the post-project period (1 to 3 first years of service management)