sm kick-off meeting - michigan...mdot intellidrive sm working group kick-off meeting june 28,...

MDOT IntelliDrivesM Working Group Kick-off Meeting

June 28, 2010,10 AM to noon

Meeting Hosts Visteon Corporation One Village Center Drive Van Buren Township, Michigan 48111

Agenda • Welcome and Introductions

• Goals and Objectives of Michigan InteIliDrivesM Working Groups

• Update on Michigan DOT InteIliDrivesM Program

• Existing Michigan InteIliDrivesM Capabilities & Resources

• Upcoming USDOT Initiatives

• Next Steps

• Q&A and Discussion

• Visteon Facility Tour

MOOT/nte,

Name Company

kurt COdLd/ AlDol- in PY~rt?OJ Of6cc S!-<'fC1VUVl"t? ry ed-it i'1.V fI.-I /) [) T - l TS

I

t \iY\ Z\VVWYH.¥

f3 fI'~...Davqkri.:,De~bt .So.z~ -rj rn~ ..,- S-fo.rf

J~-\ l),~\.t::

$:orr '7 f!c'"A,..)

-0 i j / -rf/lJ(,/L I\r+hu.r EI\dsl~y

S47/lot<- dII tj1,,, •

~ v..vc.a.~'tJA.

6ov.em '(\AIA~

:).f-t" .. 5+,,-(.kow~k;

J3/it.N P,Q,1/;..)5c.:W

j .......S'1cC,r"';ck

1) AlJJ rJ 131 Ef'?,LEIJ0

frCiI7f- ~ frr! 4?/.;~/a L\~Cb-r~

~j:,.lES ltJNRUI\1

J..,shl«(L Sdu.o.r Fa.1<I~ C)uz.",Me.vsk.,.

NDC)\ . eny, t1'\i ]3)~ (\

Lh~k.:,,-- -AJlJ. p~v: C V;S+L",", - Mv Du

U. RJ G'rrp;f;M\

\AM"''!- \\z,&.~ ~ ri\'C>l\tilW ,

~i eM 'OuT /1!t£LJ."'Y'f

M1chGN1 Te.~h Ru.eo-rd\ Jl\5t1rv..i

fuf1i,b Thfbr b ~ '\lM.-s J,...~ t rL,.,Je-ILf: a.+IOft' l.j "

H D01 - Talllll'V 1.$ C I

V1';'\-<0" - Act), ~((/.

tAH T({/

4t1f<)",j tkic.1"{ey..'lJ~ As'S" ~o Fl-l) Cc> IV\/ll 15.m I\,) fc,R

<3AKLf'rN b (au I\T~

IJ 06 t' &;/".... If,,,, til"',

.1£-" ,4#- ~,/4.,

MDDl. pDUj Mll6T • £lDL.LL....)

-Flvnrh toT- Ptn~0J IJelllk' f.I

I

i

MOOT Intel

Name Company

1'1p.,g,\(.. c.~ M~ 5o<'!\t;,;"I B. i 01 to..f5B2 \flo

5fgVe C\Ci\\ V\ m~r li+J Cledc;cleLh. _

S~(Jf VertBs+ mo'br CdJ E(ecfric\ech- _ DICK .J}g:Jn)131&1! HtlBg~LL, lfoT)1 JrCL4/0(, -fp.uL MoUIS

,HtJ~AJR.~ zhr;1/lJ --D AN Dill,,) 11\ e..

~L:t;l.o'c;

-K~III...! te.u...'1 10M ~MM~;;r

TODt? A t-.J <J <;; t:. l et.U ( C ::r

GClr\/ P/oifDW;CZI . .

J:)(1~'lellt b~()eli~' jl11J~(Zlr;; !/oEV£L

,., He.t:.- T \-\ OI1ft";

~-~= ~er.$q f±D-A bRIS Dot'il,J

,&A !LDI?fSO~

J,m 8wiklftSSO

V15rev~

_W"'jn-t .dab /4[;,<. TBrtlll$"UAC

(V1'Clf/6fttJ lrJ!L>(t£owl7 _ dU(.tn/CJ£ ~....., I

.AvTbMo"tlV£ YN~I&ffI ~

STAn 0;:" MIGl"....v-DTMB 2 -

wv\<;'o I~"taVY'dl"""q 6"'02 ,..;ca, I '.I '-1( Vt;"£c; rt.., of .....LCftt6-/I"N

-liRAN£, P[) fZ-T/0 '\J rza l;AteGf,J

~IR01J CO"IoI, -{;r Chl&.& &.iy -eoad. Comll'l. -kr Oo'Lk./and (Jdy ;II

r;J~i.J.. f-61k"1t11m -,/II 5/-

t1- v lDJ1o't 1\1'4 ,AJ5llttt "z..l

Uk:5 1.1

MDoT ~ ;J NCA-n-o c> 1

Ar-o.<1/ffZwJAwy l!JJ

tfrJ]13 2Y.

MOOTI

Name Company

hiD,;, '" G ""I :k,c

::s~\J f'. Q. ,yo K

F'!'~Moi '5" \::);01'" Ur\TR. \

lli\QI~Q b~'!'<M

\(;60WQ ~llo.(CI eM

MOOT IntelliOrive'M Working Group Meeting June 28, 2010 Visteon World Headquarters

Visteon graciously hosted the first MOOT IntelliOrive'M Working Group meeting of 2010, The meeting was well-attended, with more than 55 people present.

Kurt Cod uti Df MDOT welcomed the attendees, chaired the meeting, and introduced himself as the acting IntelliDrive'M cDDrdinatDr fDr MDOT while Greg Krueger is on a Dne year fellDwship with the USDOT, Kurt explained that Dne Df the primary gDals Df the wDrking group is fDr the state tD be prepared fDr any USDOT procurements that are released, He alsD updated attendees tD the next WDrking GrDup meeting, which is scheduled fDr September 27,2010, at the Michigan InternatiDnal Speedway, Interested groups are requested to write a two-page description Dftheir IntelliDrive'M activities, and several will be selected tD speak at the next meeting about their work, He annDunced July 31 as the due date for these tWD-page papers,

Following Kurt's introduction, Debby Bezzina of VisteDn prDvided an overview ofVisteDn's activities in the connected vehicle field, VisteDn's rDad departure and crash warning system was the first IntelliDrive'M-related project mentiDned, but she alsD described Visteon's involvement with the Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety System (IVBSS) prDject, which is nDW in the data analysis phase Df that project, Her VisteDn cDlleague (Mike Eichbrecht) gave a demDnstratiDn Df their Connected Car project, which Dffers several infDtainment applicatiDns with a tDuch-screen interface, It alsD supports diagnostics, mobility applications, and more,

Next, Steve Cook of MDOT discussed MDOT's broad IntelliDrive'M prDgram, He mentioned that driver distraction and privacy CDncerns are two of the biggest issues that thDse in the industry need to be aware Df as this prDgram mDves fDrward, He also discussed some non-safety applicatiDns Df interest tD MDOT, such as asset management and mobility, and emphasized that these shDuld nDt be DverlDDked, Finally, he mentioned that MDOT, alDng with the Center for Automotive Research, is in the process Df updating MDOT's IntelliDrive Strategic and Business Plan,

Richard Wallace of CAR fDllowed and presented the depth Df IntelliDrive'M capabilities and resources in Michigan beyDnd thDse Df MDOT, These included Michigan-based vehicle manufacturers and suppliers as well as the many test facilities, industry cDnsDrtia, prDgrams, and research effDrts bDth underway and already completed in the State, He alsD provided a short review Df CAR's Tipping PDints study, focusing Dn key obstacles (e,g" clear funding sDurce) and enablers for deplDyment, Finally, he emphasized the potential payoff for Michigan (jDbs, tax revenues) if Michigan leads the nation in IntelliDrive,

Finally, Scott ShDgan Df Parsons BrinkerhDff presented fDrthcoming USOOT IntelliDrive'M initiatives, The program has been in flux given the recent change in administratiDn, but nDW has a more defined path forward, They expect a rulemaking on V2V policy by 2013, and have several tracks fDr bDth V2V and V21 safety plans, BefDre the rulemaking, they want tD have a safety pilot to inform the 2013 decision, by demDnstrating a V2V real world implementation fDr multiple vehicle types, Specifically, they wish tD assess public acceptance of these devices in their cars, Also, the decisiDn for the DTE management should be coming SDDn,

The meeting ended with an DptiDnal (and infDrmative) tDur of VisteDn's facilities,

,l i:l' ,. ,}fri/l/I,),. ., ~,j!l"~"

~" ,,;'".I-'ntelli~iJ'e~ Slnar tet:

Working Group Kick-off Meeting

June 28, 2010 , ,

; J I ' '11'1',' ,,,I ! ./

"':;:~!~~;~/ Kurt Coduti, P.E. //)~idhigan Department of Transportation

---m I~~L Statewide ITS Program Office

Primary Objectives & Goals

~ Re-establish collaborative forum to help Michigan secure federal procurements and expedite deployment • Maintain alignment with future vision of US DOT

\ "ri )<eep moving forward together & on the same paget I!! j i1,' __ Ii/;;!~lj;/,/ .' . 'ii//I/ /

~ f1~lfilr;~POT IntelliDrivesM Strategic Plan J.. 6nKa~~~ public outreach and awareness

uHd'1Ehe:lncubator for IntelliDrivesM •••,~<

'I I\';; 1" t.Mv€eT,I)-\i-,;, Y

Michigan's IntelliDrivesM Incubator

Trained & Educated Workforce

New Jobs New Products N.ew Applications

Vehicle Deployment

Infrastructure Deployment

V21 Model

Deployments

V2V Model

Deployments

Aftermarket Model

Deployments

Research & Research & Development Development

A look back on next steps..... ~ Complete and finalize ITS Strategic Plan ~ Secure a consistent ITS funding source ~ Create an ITS Programs Office ~ Hire MDOT ITS Champion ~ Communicate ITS initiatives to all ITS stakeholders ~ Provide resources to accomplish established goals

\\~dliffi5t8I~lj~h,relationships with external stakeholders ·,t "'///"j/

I~ ~~senfVpJestbed specifics to stakeholders E>eveJdp t€~t bed agreements

/ j' ::~:.~~fr'

egin desig~rl and construction of test bed communications infrastructure

, "

",~n\\ilqH ~

t.M~€eT \ .. i, , ','

Moving Forward ~ IntelliDrivesM Showcase Papers & Presentations

• 2 pages max. on IntelliDrivesM credentials, interests, and/or ideas

• If selected, opportunity to present at next meeting • Due date for paper is July 30, 2010

,\dliidlj~1(!g,§J~ctions made by August 27th •

l~ op;~ri;;/invitation via MOOT IntelliDrivesM listserv & ITS-MI

/Next'm~eti ng : ~Wtfepi-:- September 27th, 2010 from 1 to 5 p.m.

~p'VYh~re: Michigan International Speedway \\\.<

il!ll;\;

~~M --- """"" T.. 'Vee,. ,,' r,

.-Vl Vl :J U Vl.

co

o-C C ro

~ a

MDOT IntelliDrivesM Initiatives

Michigan IntelliDrivesM 2010 Working Group Kick-off Meeting Michigan Department of Transportation

Steve Cook, P.E.

~:M---" v"",,% T_ '~Dr;ve.

MOOT's Strategic Plan for IntelliOrive(SM) MOOT's IntelliOrive(SM) Mission

Partner with pt,'c);c agencies. the automotive nnc: re(;:commllfjirarlc,tI industries, and other ilidl.'suies tG I'ead the nation in lnreNiDri~'e(SM) research and 5L'srainea lrrte;'iiD(f~'e{5M} depl'oyment. tV

p(o~'iGI(;g the pl1Clic jotJndation for ,'i '1irhigcrn '5 (;::W GLltomotive information technology industry Gna EfiS[/fing Imp({wements in transpClrtation 5vstems safety and .operational performance.

MOOT's IntelliDrive(SM) Vision Th: )!i;:hig3J1 ~J!tn=fShi'P is a r~qr.iz~ I~lc;r 0: J.."1G k;y f::15cn . :'li:higan i5 ,:artn'!fing ~'.'ith cth=r EtJ.t:! tc 3.3·5':;(: :ccr~i.ru.t~ . bt;.lliDriY;.:S)I;is Jfl =tU:fgtng inC~'H0- ':'Lth an ;ntf=pf~=:;'fi:!l

:Cf th; r:.:.::;s: i::Int:tliDr~t·~:~:'1 f:-:;Jr:h: ':';t"::-iq:mi:nt ant 6;~lc:'1n=flt l~O:: Ih: Cnit=G ~tlt=i :ctnCJ.ticn th3t 1: :=-r.tral to ~',fi:hip-n: Hfi:ng. n~'·· In:cmuttcn

t:.:hnotcgy,,;:t01:

. ~E::hi;.1n i, prtn=riq '~'ith th: 3::.tc:ncti·,: iniwtr:,.,', indciing . InI;.l1illri\·~(~:)f! t;.~t r=i~lt;. pfD.\·id.e d:-3f: 1n:-J.:::;fabl-: ~,i.1~::~ tmt . l"u;1tiD,ir~.(3...\r13rcmi;.;~ te 'h~ en: 0: th: big:;.[ ac,'an::'m;nt: in ,,';hl:1: 1l1an:;:3.:t·:,;r:n 1.."1:' i::'1=1=li:[;, tho:- t;1~emmi:.ni':3ticm i.nd;t;~tr:,.,': InI:l1illriY:l~:'.r· in:r;']j.;i trJ.n::!=crtatien ;3::ty: 111er.ility lnt ;.~:-.:.rity p3;;;ng;r and ccmm:r::iJ.l trJ.n;p«tation :Ln::; th; in::;pion :::' th.; me 12th:?! in;;'..dri;;. 3nc hli C:1f.Cn:lnt::.c ':1;:::;; in r:;';lf,.:hing. Int:EtJH Hight'.·3y ~y~t;.tn

c.;\·;.lC'pin~. an~ ~lcying Int;lEDri',;: ~~,I, , Int:lliDri\·=[S~I;hJ.i b;;n J.oC:C=1= t;.d ~c\:.gh to b: pqr.lllU11~ i.ntc

th; J-nm:.a! bl;.Cg:trn; c: ~li;:hi~m ~ tfJ.mp-ofl3ticn n-!=-=-,

Customers and Partners

Vehicle State, Local, and Commercial Fleets Trans;t and

Manufacturers Service Providers Universities USDOT Other Federal Motorists and Freight NGOs Multi-Modal

and Automotive Agencies Operations Organizations

Suppliers

i::t=lying: In ;::'::Ii\,; t=!CtTIct; :'Ii-.:higa..n ;3:-:ly:yst.,.nlclh;:r ;tak:hC!C:f; t-c t:r.1E~ man3?::m;nt IJs;et maf1J.?~mffit

c.t:edin3t: :::crt, f;;;ifCh.sta..'l.:!.J:r:i ~cr Int:t1iDri",;(S~'.L t;H :ysti-n1 r:-:;';lf-':r., syH.;tl1 r;.~:an::hl

~'_;:Lt-ll,n,,',·--"·'f',:1, ....,: I'·' )"""le"·...;l; -n' c.;y;lcf1n~t. 3ni. di-Yi-!.c:!=nli-nt. a..'l.C

lfl:citru:m:ri- mrfa,tf'...:ti.o'f; Ll.Il. ~'~ l""~~.(

:lfh- d.?t:tc\"'I1l~U ;3.!ly~lc:1n-:t1t

"'."-:.11. --- BI

CCCrCtn3t.; .mC

I;".;[a:::: ~\Ii;:h~::a!1 " "

tny;;tlU;nt al1c JrtrJ:[

J,;;tt:y j:lann:-:'

~leym=nt thfC~~h

analyst: Jm: r;;.;;u::ha;:[1\"it1;. thr::\:.,gh

Ac\'afl,;:'; ~Ii;:higan,

prc\'lcing :yi~:; 0; I:-:.i:?!al Ul~

J;·.J.f;.t1;iS

"~tr~J.:h ar.c j:tbti.:

b4;~ 1"lt:lliD(i';=(3~\tIbJ.;?1i Int:l1iDti."2-(3!,f: Ib.;e!i Int;.lIillriy:{~~,.r:~;lgnin~. t::ting:, an::' !1UtnUln: andtllJn:;:a:.tt.:r:1·: anc

Midhigan IntelliDrivesM Test Facility Descriptions .1 Chrysler Tech Center (Auburn Hills)

- Six roadside locations, three with DSRC capabilities .! Farmington Hills - Largely along 12 Mile Road; includes two radio towers and 17 roadside ~~ocatiorls

• Rock Financial Showplace (Novi) - Nine locations, using Motorola equipment

.1 CVPC Intersection (Southfield) - Two intersections equipped with WiFi and DSRC antennas

.1 Michigan International Speedway - Two 1.9 mile road courses and one two-mile oval can be used for testing

• I Telegraph Road Corridor - Proposing to install 22 multiple intersections with DSRC to broadcast

SPAT data .1 Owosso

- One intersection of seven proposed has been instrumented, and five vehicles have DGE in-vehicle units for SPAT

.1 USDOT Developmental Test Environment - Largest single deployment of IntelliDrivesM assets in Michigan with 55

RSE's .1 MDOT Region Access Points

<'¥.*(lllMi.lD,',eT 3

NfDOT IntelliDrivesM Programs & Research

• bata Use Analysis and Processing (DUAP) & DUAP 2 - Evaluates uses and benefits of IntelliDrivesM related data for

transportation agency management and operations - Investigates how the availability of data from IntelliDrivesM

equipped vehicles impact data uses and benefits for safety, managing traffic, and managing a DOT's transportation assets

• wlDOl 70 Fleet Vehicle Program - Seven Regions, 10 vehicles in each Region: GPS, accelerometer,

and diagnostics.

• ~Iippery Roads1- Two vehicles collecting road surface weather related data.

• Eliminating Slippery Conditions by Integrating Mobile bservations

- Determine accuracy and reliability of Roadway Weather Information Stations. Data collection of road surface quality IRI.

l~M~i0'·T 4

NIDOT IntelliDrivesM Programs & Research

., Critical Highway Infrastructure Monitoring Project - Uses communication, sensor, and collection technology to

monitor two bridges - Three Universities in Michigan awarded Infrastructure

monitoring research and development projects

.1 Multi-phase SPAT/GID Communication System

- Real time signal phase timing delivered to the driver

.1 Pool Fund Research University of Virginia

- SPAT & California PATH, Pavement Management Support & Auburn University, Traffic Signal Algorithms & University of Virginia

'....'~MJ~l>ti~i~~TIo:.j LJI" Cc' 5

MDOT Fleet Data Collection

OUAP

080-//6 connection U

date-time

position

speed

accelerometry

air temperature

engine speed

engine air mass flow

fuel consumption

70-vehicle MOOT fleet

GPS ,

~··M- """"T~ _tV~~~e.

Eliminating Slippery Conditions by Integrating Mobile Observations

visibilityFixed Environmental Mobile precipitation rate Sensor Station Weather precipitation type

Platform air temperature

[ ~ speed

ASS actuation -traction cOnti sl actllgtionvisibility

precipitation rate

precipitation type

air temperature

surface status

pavement temperature

surface status

accelerometry

~ In (,.. ;hC?:'riv,'e. ~.

"I~~'M~ '~T

- ------

Bridge Monitoring System Overview 121} \:iWer Wit! arrterma

<nd CCTV cam!l'.:l 71.]' /Xlle ....,tl an1!F1nas

and CCrtJ cam!l'a ,"~ "

3 1.:-::~'"1 ~<-

,~

}\<-I~il;tTld ~'

--y

, ~ .' ,- "II)" ~A .::' ,-. ~ /'k'~"'" 7, :

'_"':;1' N':..J ~

i' .." ,." ' 1~i .!}

Waq,~-t.tJoon

",~",_~~,,_~S!lnm'S & Data Lomef Nfj lh:8'J:8' CaJaettl \'alIt .rtP.1P.'rl

oordanirg oata: Lclmw, • ".'-E. IhISV and oata Cut Ri\lef' Brldge

0ist\Wia1 S)'&1e1'l'l

I" I Phase 1I

I..o<sJ S8'lsot

Includes fiber optics, concrete deck & traffic sensors

5 d Gil! PTp.sO(:

S:Jutl To'NIS.:;:- .., ;- ~'= :i'J~:~:

..... ~

arb00,

:: ,g GH.l ' p t~:'j"C." - J '"

-J -- -- ,-, ', 'i • "f .. • ,,," _.'oJ '...),'':'' , .,.-~.

., I ~j'~!.~:;" '

"y,.,' ,,

LaeaI SMsot NetwId:

Maddnac Brldge

~:" Phase 2 "I

"'V·:M~ ." T" jr;iD:i~e

DUAP Data Collection

Mobile JVeather Platform.s

;S;:-..::;, ~ '.::::

Slippery Road Application Setver

Cut River Data Logger

Teletrac Data Setver

(20 MDOT vehicles)

DUAP

MDOTFteet Data Loggers (70 vehicles)

Other MDOT Systems (TMS, geodata)

MtTS Center Data Setver

User Presentations

Data Collection Database and and Aggregation Presentation

~. - ~"T(4Mv~e

·ltMVteT .,1,.1.' )/." ,("

IntelliDrivesM Capabilities and Resources in Michigan

Richard Wallace, Center for Automotive Research

June 28, 2010

IMi1€eT Michigan IntelliDrivesM Ecosystem

• IntelliOrivesM has great potential to save lives, reduce congestion, reduce individual travel time, reduce vehicle emissions, and provide location-specific information to travelers

• MOOT's IntelliOrivesM program has been around since the early 2000s, and many other organizations in Michigan are involved in IntelliOrive - Vehicle manufacturers - Vehicle suppliers - Other engineering companies - County and local government (road agencies) - Test facilities - Universities - Trade and other industry organizations - Not-for-profits ...

Michigan IntelliDrivesM

IMV€eT Test Facility Locations

;;'{)!J ,I~

~'----.-----.t -------

-~~:::=:::::C'\

"1 ~T -~Z~-~.~f ~l:t+"'f:<;"~;: '\ -- I'

,~~", .- wui<»n ,

,- .-.' - i~~- I

N\:'__+ \ ~--- r,

- \.XLI~¥~~~I",-- ,I,

1 1,----------r- j

",11 U.1d\ luwnsh,p C' \\\ I I I'

"', ~, "'."-t- ,-+-~~ t "

~ : )'

' "'" 15 . ,(

.,j,,,,'it-'-~,+j

.-';1~tt\'1 I

~-fi .S: i;~r f- ~ _. n ',.-. l'HAlle c;__,.

C'i-r. ~ Legend ~ ---------.----w-:~

• CVPC Chelsea i ~,

• Rock Financial 1:.(>; .

. ~;. I"r!""'~"Telegraph (15 Mile)

• DTE ,

Telegraph (12 Mile) l t,.c,,~IIi-•• RCOC ~r." • :&""'....-...:,, • Farmington ) ~ ~ ';;§!cpr ~ \ f4 -",

tChrysler

• CVPC Southfield MOOT Asset Inventory lM..,eT

I

I

IM~€eT Michigan-Based IntelliDrivesM Consortia • Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Consortium (VII-C)

- Collection of representatives from nine light-duty vehicle manufacturers that conducted VII Proof of Concept testing using the USDOT Developmental Test Environment

• Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership (CAMP) - Formed by Ford Motor Company and General Motors Corporation in 1995 to

accelerate the implementation of crash avoidance countermeasures to improve traffic safety-involved with V2V and intersection V21 safety

• ITS Michigan - Award-winning Michigan chapter of ITS America, which seeks to improve the

safety, security, and efficiency of the nation's transportation system through ITS

• Connected Vehicle Trade Association (CVTA) - Non-profit organization that advocates effective communication, collaboration, and

consensus-building amongst companies, organizations, and governments involved in the use of vehide communications

• Specialty Equipment Manufacturers Association (SEMA) - Aftermarket supplier trade association with a strong interest in InteliiDrivesM

technology, especially for equipping existing vehicles with communication devices to speed up deployment

• Michigan IntelliDrivesM Working Group-all of you!

·. Other Michigan Programs and lMi1r&T Research Efforts Related to IntelliDrivesM

• Southeastern Michigan Snow and Ice Management - Improve winter road maintenance efficiency using vehicle

communication technology

• Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems - Four-year research program UMTRI has undertaken to develop

and test an integrated crash-warning system

• Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance System - Program to design, test, and develop systems to prevent crashes

at intersections using new wireless communications technologies

• Connected Vehicle Proving Center (CVPC) - MEDC-funded effort at UM Dearborn

IMv€eT Michigan Automotive Industry Investment

• Michigan is the home of the automotive industry, and our automakers and suppliers are critical to the long-term success of IntelliDrivesM in the state and nationally

· Automakers - General Motors (and OnStar) - Ford (and SYNC) - Other Vehicle Manufacturers

• Chrysler, Toyota, Nissan, and Mercedes-Benz have research centers in Michigan that are engaged in IntelliDrivesM research

· Suppliers - Continental-Active Passive Integration, AutoLinQTM - Delphi-has partnered with others to demonstrate wireless access in

vehicles - Bosch-has been researching ways to improve overall vehicle safety

with communication technology - DENSO has supplied DSRC radios for several efforts - Other suppliers playing a role in Michigan include Visteon, Panasonic,

Vector CANtech, Takata, and Kostal

IMv€eT IntelliDrive Technology Forecast

• Which communication technologies do you believe will be used for direct communication between vehicles and vehicle and the infrastructure for the following applications by 2015? (asked in late 2007/early 2008)

In-vehicle warnings at intersections, traffic sians, and other road features

Vehicle-to-vehicle safety warnings, including approaching emergency vehicle warnings

Probe vehicles for traffic management, traveler information, and traffic plannin Tolls and electronic pavments Commercial and public fleet management applications

Commercial and private applications, such as remote diagnostics and media downloads

WiMax

DSFlGlWiMax

Ci=lUu[ar/3G .

IMv€eT Autonomous v. Cooperative (or Both)

• For the following safety features, please indicate whether each is most likely to be implemented cooperatively (i.e., vehicle-tovehicle communication used) or autonomously (i.e., each vehicle uses only its own sensors) by the following dates.

Emergency vehicle approaching (or ahead) warnin

Cooperative forward collision warnin Pre-crash sensinq and warnin

Emergency electronic brake light (EEBL); early notification of lead vehicle brakinq hard

Vehicle-to-vehicle road feature notification

Road condition warning (vehicle-based); environmental sensin

BOth

Both

• The future appears likely to be both autonomous and connected!

~ IntelliDrivesM Tipping Points Study: IMi1€eT Background and Methods

• IntelliDrive affected by larger issues, such as: - Change in presidential administration

- Economic crisis, especially in the automotive sector

• Interested in what is needed for IntelliDrive to move from current state to broad deployment

• Conducted study of experts (45 in total) - 15 participated in detailed interviews on a range of related topics

- 30 participated in two-round, web-based survey effort (questions derived largely from the interviews and open-ended results from first round)

- Experts drawn from a broad cross-section of IntelliOrive sectors, including DOTs (federal, state, and local), vehicle manufacturers, telematics providers, automotive suppliers, tolling agencies, and others

~ _ _ IntelliDrivesM Tipping Points Study: (tMr;eeT Notable Results

• Strong consensus that IntelliDrive will be important for improving safety and mobility, but two main obstacles exist: - No clear plan for deploying both in cars and on infrastructure - No dedicated funding source for infrastructure deployment

• Source of funding for infrastructure emerged as greatest uncertainty hindering development and deployment - State of national economy and auto industry do not help and will lead to

some delay in deployment (auto industry status leads to significant delay)

- Dedicated federal funding is most clear solution

• Standards also are important, because they promote and ensure interoperability and provide clear direction to industry

• Public service campaign recommended to increase awareness of benefits among the public-led by USDOT, states, AASHTO

• Aftermarket is critical for retrofitting existing vehicles

... IntelliDrivesM Tipping Points Study: lM~€eT Technology and Application Results

• DSRC is the only technology that can support very low latency, cooperative, active safety - Soft safety applications can be supported by other means (e.g.,

3G,4G)

• IntelliDrive will be important for environmental benefits - Fuel economy improvements, reduction in GHG emissions, etc.,

through improved situation awareness, optimized routing, etc.

- Respondents split, though slightly against, IntelliDrive as part of a cap-and-trade program

• Interviewees see importance of tolling applications but are split on whether this is a leading (built-in funding source) or trailing application (too few tolling sites to support a market)

IMi1€eTEconomic Impact of IntelliDrive in Michigan

• Given Michigan leadership in IntelliDrive, it promises to have a substantial impact on the Michigan economy - Potential for 16,000 jobs IF Michigan is the home of IntelliDrive, as

it has been the home of auto

- Up to $177 million annually in income tax revenues

- Only small benefits (about $0.27 per vehicle mile traveled) needed for net positive cost benefit

• The challenge: - To reap these benefits, Michigan must be the clear leader in

IntelliDrivesM

- This will require collaboration between government, industry, universities, not-for-profits, etc.

• That is why we are here today

, ,.. ~~_, _~,m".

!" ti'l! iDrive, '\;."..*'

Evolution of IntelliDrive Original VII Deployment Model

• DSRC based for all applications

• Infrastructure intensive using new DSRC technology

• Vehicle turnover for embedded OSRC technology

• Start with V21 (for all application types) and evolve into V2V (safety)

US DOT's Current Perspective on IntelliDrive Deployment • Non-safety (mobility, environment)

• Leverage existing data sources & communications; include DSRC as it becomes available

• Support development of key applications for public agencies using current data sources

• Safety -7 DSRC • Aggressively pursue V2V; leverage vehicle capability for V21 spot safety

• Can leveraging of nomadic devices & retrofitting accelerate benefits?

• Infrastructure requirement is still a TSO (security)

10 1u.s. Department of Transportation

IntelliDrivesM Strategy

'()ngh18"\ljl '.Vi~iQn:' .

,'~faty"$E, ntQ~J!j)Y' ...... ". ,.",.. ,..:.;...utl'Qug..

wl~Je$s tect1noli)gy

2010 • V2V is lead application • DSRC-enabled devices provide accelerated benefits

• V21 for localized safety

2013 • NHTSA regulatory decision point

Weather/environment + Data from vehicles

+ Infrastructure

Non-OSRC data sources

OSRC data sources as infrastructure is implemented

Existing public sector data sources

¥~~""""'"~ ,.t('!I;~1!

201 • Applications'

continue

,lntalUOrive$l4 !rVi$ion~ "$afety& 1TI0i>iUty thr,oligh wi."less technOIQlY

New Public SectorApps for Revolution Mobility Improv".,.

Original Strategy Evolving Strategy

o u.s. Department of Transportation 2

~ I,,, _'-:i

'ntclliOrive,,--,,-{"

Technical and Policy Interactions (For Example: Security vs Privacy Trade-ofts)

Trade-offs- , ....Technical Issues Policy Issues " & Constraints & Constraints

n Options & Recommendations

Deployment Model(s)


i¥iiW .. _ 1.. IIt·",

, -~>,'ntFl/iOrive,

"~

Technical Challenges

Issue Challenge DOT Response

Range of available communications technologies

Desi re to see a comparison to prove that DSRC is needed

DOT analysis (see chart)

Frequency issues Capability in large scale situations Interference

Doing scalability testing under V2V program

Security Issues Authentication, overhead, oversight, costs

•Work underway on technical side with security experts on authentication process

•On policy side, developing a roadmap to identify and resolve Issues

Interoperability Need to explore problem

V2V Track 2 addresses technical interoperability issues


2.0

~Ji,i .,., : '-, I;" UiDr;ve

~"-~YLatency vs. Communications Technologies For IntelliDrivesM

60

40

20

10

5.0 ,.-..-, rfl

'"0s:: 4.0o u OJ rfl

s:: 3.0.'--' >-. us::

5.9 .0002 sees

Communications Technologies

t wo-Way Satellite (60+ sees)

Active Safety Latency Requirements (secs)

Cellular (1.5 - 3.5 sees) (1.5 - 3.5 sees)

~ ,.J

1.0 1 _

.021f------------------

Traffic Signal Violation Warning I""'IT"I Terrestrial Digital Radio & IlliJ Satellite Digital Audio Radio Curve Speed Warning

(10 - 20 sees)

O

Emergency Electronic Brake Lights

Pre-Crash Sensing

Cooperative Forward Collision Warning

Left Turn Assistant Bluetooth Lane Change Warning

(3 - 4 sees) Stop Sign Movement Assistance

WiMax

Least stringent latency requirement for Active Safety

( I sec)

Most Stringent latency requirement for Active Safety

(.02 sec)

I 0.1

I 1.0

I 0.1

I 0.02

I 0.1

I 0.1

I 0.1

I 0.1

-<IIIl

" u.s. Department of Transportation Data source: Vehicle Safety Communications Project - Final Report

.01

5

""§O'"'' L L_Jhk"" n,,,,,", .... . . . ."""'.\..',;; n;Drive

~~""..f""

Business Challenges Issue Challenge DOT Response

Business Case Public will not bUy safety

• DOT will conduct economic impact analysis as part of regulatory decision

• DOT will work with industry to examine opportunities for accelerating deployment through aftermarket and retrofit - analysis will look at incentives and potential barriers

Production Timing Internal company decisions to make major changes can be 2-5 year time frame

• Sources Sought Notification to move development along faster

• Safety Pilot to demonstrate capability and determine what works most effectively

DSRC chip manufacturing

Limited market • Need to explore problem


'\: '.·:W.',* .. ~Afl!ItfKfJj}Jfl2

. ,~-"* t"l t'(lfffDrive.

%;."'",1"'''

Cultural Challenges

Issue Challenge DOT Response

Negative experience with VII

Process felt closed, especially with Standards development

• Commitment to public working group meetings

• Standards meetings are open to those interested in participating

Pace of deployment Too slow • Focus on V2V and clear goals within 4 year time frame

• Engaging industry on steps to move forward with SSN and model deployment in near-term

Cultural disconnect among players

Data sharing Liability

• DOT would like to explore what data is desired from device manufacturers and apps developers

• DOT will explore boundaries of data and liability

• DOT will facilitate discussion with industry and OEMs

o u.s. Department 01 Transportation 7

~ .. _n,,;~:.~, x_* '., j ,·I! iDrive.

"'~'h>/'

Policy Research Goals

• Address policy and institutional issues that limit or challenge successful IntelliDrive deployment.

• Formulate recommendations and options. • Identify how key partners and industry will

contribute to move IntelliDrive research and deployment forward.


"""'" .E'I4~",""t"''''' ; 'l' iIiDr;ve.

"."~.y

Intended Outcomes

1. Develop a set of alternative, viable deployment approaches for IntelliDrivesM

2. Produce a range of options that will include: • Policies, Legislation, and Regulatory options • Governance Structures • Investment Models and Market Incentives • Resolutions to Institutional Issues

3. Combine deployment approaches with policy options to produce a set of richly detailed deployment scenarios

4. Development of concepts and recommendations


~ :, '~" """'''''''''' , dcHiOrive.

,~

Research Areas and Key Questions

• Track 1: Deployment Scenarios and Implementation and Operations Strategies

• Define key requirements, Identify alternative strategies

• Track 2: Financing and Investment Models • How will IntelliDrive be funded and by whom?

• Track 3: Governance Models • What elements of the IntelliDrive system need to be governed? What

are options for doing so?

• Track 4: Institutional Issues • What are the major institutional, legal, and policy issues? How can they

be resolved? How do we address privacy and ensure that applications do not cause driver distraction?


~''''"''''''''._~_~"xi'':~~~ "~~-.' 'Ii: Drive .. '\"",-,.//

Program Scope

Program Milestone: • Potential NHTSA rulemaking decision on V2V in 2013

potentially covering passenger cars, trucks, busses.


~ '_':""~,%t!#ft , 'U,ILC?,riv,e,

"+.,~"

V2V Policy Issues

• Assumptions: • 2013 Rulemaking decision is basis for timing of V2V

policy research - critical issues and research that feeds into rulemaking takes priority

• Focused on V2V, but not excluding V21

• V2V deployment concept assumes minimal or no infrastructure

• V2V deployment concept potentially includes embedded I retrofit, and aftermarket devices

~ U,S. Department of Transportation 12

" ' . IE ,,"'...,.~.

Safety Pilot,o<Cl';e Goals: - Support the 2013 Regulatory V2V Decision with Field Data - Public Awareness & Acceptance

Primary Objectives • Demonstrate V2V real world implementation

• MUltiple vehicle types (carsE trucks, buses, rail, etc) • Obtain substantial empirical data

• Assess driver acceptance of vehicle based safety systems • Explore opportunities for accelerating safety benefits through aftermarket devices and retrofit systems

Secondary Objectives • Enable vehicle-infrastructure (V21) safety applications • Leverage data for non-safety applications such as mobility, environment, and weather


,:~::'''''''7A_ '" te/liDrive.

""',t.o".,..J'''

Safety Pilot Activities • Driver Clinics

• Driver acceptance data from light vehicle driver clinics at various locations • Explore similar opportunities for other vehicle types

• Performance testing in multiple geographic environments using small numbers of light vehicles and nomadic devices at same locations

• Model Deployment • Critical Mass/Exposure testing -7 large number of vehicles and devices

creating a "highly saturated" operating environment • Mixture of integrated safety systems with nomadic devices • Cars, trucks, buses, fleets, rail crossings • Lots of vehicles, limited infrastructure


" a~Mm&XIjYJlNm:'$k'l:'''# "I' ~i: ~4+~z\f'i'Dr,ve,

Safety Pilot Roadmap (rev 14) ',,~'

! 01 I I I I iii

'.··\rjtj~1.I~t~~~~~,~~t~!i::i SY~tlllJl·~igHtVllt\ldl~;~llilds

!

~ ;§ ()

~ '5

'E OJ ;·R1te&~W<lltOe\ilce ..E > I' O!'iYlltqpmEmt:i " o

!C. OJ o Qj 1::> o

::;;;

c: o ~ ::J

~w 1 .......

CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013

02 103 04J,-----0-1I 02 [03 I 04 I 01 [02 I 03 I 04I I I I I,, ,,,, ,,

Input to Industry • standards based

upon lest results

V2V Benefits o Assessment V2V Regulatory

Decision Point• ..... _

o U.S. Department of Transportation

I

15

,"'"' ""'i'fltf,,",~Y1f1" "'Ii; n' Zo;i";/e

'j- r ""-",*,',"'

V21 Safety Focus Areas

• Intersections • Speed Management • Run-off road and lane departure • Enforcement and Operational

Safety for Transit and Commercial Vehicles


, ; .,. ~;~:--"~ i I· •

·1I :·"'Dr,ve. ",~p~+

V21 Safety Plan

• Track 1 - Applications Analysis • Selection of Safety Applications (Sept 2010)

• Track 2 - Prototype Applications • Field Operational Test (FOT) Go/No-Go decision (202012)

• Track 3 - Communications and Mapping • Test and evaluate SPaT, issue SPaT Policy Guidance (20 2013) • Test and evaluate Mapping solutions • Test and Evaluate Communication Requirements

• Track 4 - Benefits Assessment • Perform FOTs based on selected safety applications (2013-2014)

• Track 5 - Deployment Planning (ongoing) • Development of Toolbox for practitioners and Public Agency Guidelines


~ '~-""""j' .jUJlj~r;",e

""'->

Safety Program Workshop

• Hilton Chicago Northbrook

• July 20-22, 2010

• Day 1: IntelliDriveSM Safety Program Roadmaps and Discussion (V2V, Safety Pilot, DSRC Device Certification, V21 Safety)

• Day 2: IntelliDriveSM Policy Roadmaps with a focus on reaching the V2V 2013 Regulatory decision milestone

• Day 3: Continuation of Policy Discussion

• Webinar available for those unable to attend

• Visit website for more details

() u.s. Department of Transportation 18

Detroit Proof-of-Concept Test Bed

• USDOT has solicited bidders for ongoing operation and maintenance of the Michigan Development Test Environment (DTE)

• Initial goal is to make DTE an effective facility for continued research, testing and demonstration

• Announcement of selection of contractor is anticipated at any time

For More Information. • •

http://www. intellidriveusa .or~ s.... il'OO~C4'e-j bjllh..e-IjS O.~rtme"" ei jrlllls~Or1.t~l\

BUSIed! W;! 111119%';:" Ttsf1!"1(;!CRY "':jlll".ffii1!ftpcn, ~I"d ~ I te f '~Drlve,"

Safer. Smarter.

?: o:! ,j ~ ':1,

Nl)"V~; I;; Ui;el.l;Eh

Proof of Concept Test Results Relelled t.13fth 11th, 20('~ at J 04pm

IntefllOr;veSM Brand Replac.. VII F@bruarj 2Jrd 2QDg ~110 12am

SAFETRlp·21 News Dicembef .lit"" 2006 at 3 12pm

~jt "Jl'Nb? I E',o:nls Ci/lt;r.,;nt

o SubSCflN! 19 cur FeN

~'~'''t _1:lIlml~~.. ___Lw.~-'!l, _ __l;e ""Qi -_.- .. p. __.IU,......

-.e·-.>._ :; ~:r f J~~.. il,['·,", "'-~:-.~ ~~~~ .• ;",:~ ::;'T·£;-~·I:·.,=- ;:~"", •. :;r "ill~ "d" '"ott: :1

"'~l"t"u; .. ~~ :aLi'~~ ':~,~!~""\''''l F'.~f~~.'··:·~1----- ::;.~.,":~:.:-;.; -'.;;~.~,.~':-:.-~.:-.; ;....:..'";.-_.,---~ ,,-,."-,

Greener. q> Downloaa nus Vla.o

sm kick-off meeting - michigan...mdot intellidrive sm working group kick-off meeting june 28,...

Documents