slide 1 comprehensive glaucoma management with cosopt ™ cosopt (dorzolamide hci-timolol maleate...
TRANSCRIPT
Slide 1
Comprehensive Glaucoma Management with COSOPT™
COSOPT (dorzolamide HCI-timolol maleate ophthalmic solution) is a trademark of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA.
Slide 2
Evolution of the Definition of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
• Former definition– A disorder characterized by increased IOP that
may cause impaired vision, ranging from slight loss to absolute blindness
• Current definition– Primary open-angle glaucoma is a multifactorial
optic neuropathy in which there is a characteristic acquired loss of retinal ganglion cells and atrophy of the optic nerve
IOP=intraocular pressure
Adapted from Berkow R, Fetcher AJ, eds. The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy, 15th ed, 1987; Preferred Practice Pattern™. American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2000.
Slide 3
Risk Factors for Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Damage
• Established– Elevated IOP– Age– Race– Family history
• Potential– Cold hands/feet– Diabetes mellitus– Systemic hypertension– Nocturnal hypotension– Migraines– Peripheral vasospasm
• Atherosclerosis– Myopia– Optic disc hemorrhages– Peripapillary atrophy– Diastolic and/or
perfusion pressure
Adapted from Flammer J Glaucoma, 2001; Drance S et al Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:699-708; Bonomi L et al Ophthalmology 2000;107:1287-1293; Hoyng PF et al Int Ophthalmol 1992;16:65-73; Raitta C, Sarmela T Acta Ophthalmol 1970;48:303-308; Hayakawa T et al J Glaucoma 1998;7:306-311.
Slide 4
AGIS Demonstrated that Low IOP Is Associated with Reduced Progression of Visual-Field Defect*
*Conclusive results from randomized clinical trials needed
Adapted from the AGIS Investigators Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:429-440.
–2
–1
0
1
2
3
4
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96
Follow-Up (months)
Me
an
ch
an
ge
inv
isu
al-
fie
ld d
efe
ct
sc
ore
<50% of visits IOP <18 mmHg (mean 20.2)50–75% of visits IOP <18 mm Hg (mean 16.9)75–100% of visits IOP <18 mm Hg (mean 14.7)100% of visits IOP <18 mmHg (mean 12.3)
(N=586 eyes)
Slide 5
As Did OHTS...
*At month 60OHTS=Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study; POAG=primary open-angle glaucoma
Adapted from Kass M et al Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:701-713.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%Treated (n=817)Observation (n=819)
% IOP reduction(from baseline)
Cumulative probability ofdeveloping POAG*
4.0
22.5
9.5
4.4
53.7% differential
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Slide 6
COSOPT™ Maintained IOP Reduction up to 9 mmHg over 15 Months
p<0.05 for all mean IOP values vs. baselineAdapted from Boyle JE et al Ophthalmology 1998;105(10):1945-1951.
0
16
17
18
20
26
28
Week 2
3 6
Month
IOP
2 h
ou
rs a
fter
adm
inis
trat
ion
(m
mH
g)
COSOPT (n=112)dorzolamide 2% (n=109)timolol 0.5% (n=110)
–9 mmHg (p<0.05
vs.baseline)
9 12 15
24
22
Double blind Open extension
21
–34%COSOPT (dorzolamide HCI-timolol maleate ophthalmic solution) is a trademark of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA.
Slide 7
In a Clinical Study
COSOPT™ Provided Powerful IOP ReductionEquivalent Efficacy* of COSOPT vs. Latanoprost 0.005%
*Differences were not statistically significant.
Randomized, observer-blind, parallel-group, three-month, multicenter study
–9
–8
– 7
–6
–5
–4
–3
–2
–1
0
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3
Mea
n c
han
ge
in d
iurn
al IO
P f
rom
bas
elin
e (m
mH
g)
COSOPT (n=138)Latanoprost (n=143)
Baseline = patients withup to a three-week
washout period
–27.1% –28.6% –29.0%
–29.3% –30.6% –30.5%
Slide 8
COSOPT™ Provided Powerful 24-Hour IOP Control
• COSOPT provided significantly better IOP control than latanoprost at 10 PM (p=0.006)
• At all other time points, similar IOP reductions were achieved in both groups*p=0.006 vs. latanoprostAdapted from Konstas AGP et al Ophthalmology 2003 (in press).
0
10
11
12
13
16
18
6:00 AM
Mea
n IO
P (
mm
Hg
)
COSOPT (n=33)Latanoprost (n=33)
15
14
17
10:00 AM 2:00 PM 6:00 PM 10:00 PM* 2:00 AM
Slide 9
aFixed combinationbIn a three-month trial of patients with IOP 24 mmHg, patients were randomized to receive either COSOPT twice daily (n=114) vs. monotherapy with timolol 0.5% twice daily (n=112) or dorzolamide 2.0% three times daily (n=109). IOP values shown are trough and peak at day 90.
cIn patients with baseline IOP 24–36 mmHg treated with travoprost 0.004% once daily.dIn patients with mean baseline IOP 22–34 mmHg treated with bimatoprost 0.03% once daily.
Efficacy of COSOPT™ vs. Travoprost and Bimatoprost in Product Label Information
• Travoprost and bimatoprost IOP loweringas reflected in respective product labels
• COSOPT a,b can providean IOP reductionof 7.7–9.0 mmHg1
• IOP lowering with travoprostand bimatoprost 4,5
travoprostc bimatoprostd
Slide 10
COSOPT™: Proven IOP Control
• Powerful IOP Control– Reduced IOP 33% from untreated baseline– Reduced IOP up to 34% in 12-month extension
• Comparable efficacy vs. prostaglandins– 3-month comparative trial vs. latanoprost– Consistent 24-hour diurnal control vs. latanoprost– Comparable efficacy vs. bimatoprost and travoprost
• Proven safety profile– Generally well tolerated
• Prescribed in over 23.6 million patient-months
Adapted from Boyle JE et al Ophthalmology 1998;105(10):1945-1951; Konstas AGP et al Ophthalmology 2003 (in press).
Slide 11
Moving Beyond IOP Control
• The progression of glaucoma appears to be multifactorial– Up to 30% of newly diagnosed POAG patients
may have “normal”* IOP
– Lowering IOP alone does not always prevent progression of visual-field damage
– Vascular factors, without elevated IOP, may lead to tissue ischemia and glaucomatous damage
*21 mmHg
Adapted from Flammer J Glaucoma. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber, 2001; Beers MH, Berkow R, eds. The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy. 17th ed. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck Research Laboratories, 1999; Broadway DC, Drance SM Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:862-870; Drance SM et al Am J Ophthalmol 1998;125(5):585-592; Dielemans I et al Ophthalmology 1994;101:1851-1855.
Slide 12
Definition of CO•REGULATION™
The simultaneous and active alteration of two control systems within the eye in glaucoma
• Mechanical: Decreased IOP
• Vascular: Increased OBF
IOP=intraocular pressureOBF=ocular blood flowCO•REGULATION and the symbol for CO•REGULATION are trademarks of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA.
Adapted from Alward WLM Glaucoma: The Requisites in Ophthalmology. St. Louis: Mosby, 2000.
OBFIOP
Slide 13
The Role of Ischemia in Glaucoma
• Inadequate blood perfusion of the tissues deprives tissues of nutrients and oxygen, and may lead to cell death
• Ocular ischemia may be central to retinal ganglion cell death
Adapted from Flammer J Glaucoma. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber, 2001; Harris A et al Prog Retin Eye Res 1999;18(5):669-687; Harris A et al Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2001;12:131-137.
Slide 14
The IOP-Ocular Perfusion-Apoptosis Relationship
IOP
Apoptosis
Ocularperfusion
Adapted from Harris A Ophthalmol Times 1997;(Suppl 2):S1-S23.
Slide 15
Measuring Ocular Blood Flow
• No single technique can accurately assess all relevant vascular beds in glaucoma
• Multiple techniques should be used to measure all relevant vascular beds in glaucoma
• Several noninvasive techniques provide relevant information
Adapted from Harris A et al Surv Ophthalmol 1998;42(6):509-533.
Slide 16
OBF Measurement Techniques
MeasurementTechnique Parameter Location Pros Cons
Color Doppler Blood velocity, Retrobulbar vessels User specified vessels Expensive Imaging (CDI) Calculated vascular and location and complex
resistance
Scanning Laser Filling times, AVP, Retinal, choroid Highly sensitive to Invasive,Ophthalmoscope (SLO) capillary circulation time change expensive,angiography velocities time-consuming
Heidelberg Retinal Unitless flow, Retinal capillary beds, Volumetric blood flow Unitless, Flowmetry (HRF) blood velocity Ocular nerve head expensive,
difficult to interpret
Pulsatile Ocular Blood IOP Unknown, presume Inexpensive and easy Measure IOP,Flow (POBF) to be choroidal to use non-site specific
AVP=arteriovenous passage
Adapted from Harris A et al Prog Retin Eye Res 1999;18(5):669-687; Harris A et al Surv Ophthalmol 1998;42(6):509-533.
Slide 17
Can any medications improve OBF independent of IOP?
Slide 18
Glaucoma Medications and OBF
Drug Class Parameter Effect
Topical CAIs AVP Times DecreaseRetinal capillary velocity Increase
Selective beta blockers End diastolic velocity Increase
Alpha agonists End diastolic velocity Neutral
Prostaglandins End diastolic velocity NeutralPOBF Increase (IOP dependent)
CAIs = carbonic anhydrase inhibitorsAdapted from Nicolela MT et al Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122(6):784-789; Harris A et al J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1999;15(3):189-197;Harris A et al Ophthalmology 2000;107(3):430-434; Harris A et al Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1996;74:569-572; Harris A et al Am J Ophthalmol1995;120:168-175; Lachkar Y et al Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1591-1594.
Slide 19
Topical CAIs:Inhibition of Carbonic Anhydrase
Dorzolamide
More carbon dioxide
vasodilation
Lessbicarbonate
CO2
HCO3
Adapted from Harris A, Jonescu-Cuypers CP Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2001;12:131-137.
Slide 20
Dorzolamide and Ocular Hemodynamics
• Hastened AVP and capillary velocity in individuals with healthy eyes
• Improved AVP and contrast sensitivity in NTG
• Compared to betaxolol, dorzolamide improved inferotemporal retinal AVP in NTG
NTG = normal-tension glaucoma
Adapted from Harris A et al J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1999;15:189-197; Harris A et al Ophthalmology 2000;107;430-434; Harris A et al Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1996;74:569-572; Harris A et al Eur J Ophthalmol 2003;13:24-31.
Slide 21
Results of Recent Clinical Studies Suggest
Dorzolamide Improves AVP Times
*In the temporal inferior artery
Adapted from Harris A et al Am J Ophthalmol 2000;107(3):430-434.
0
5
10
15
20
IOP
(m
mH
g)
Dorzolamide
14
17
Betaxolol
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
AV
P T
imes
* (s
ec)
Dorzolamide
2.2
2.7
2.5
2.7
Betaxolol
14
17
(n=9)
Baseline
4 weeks of treatment
(n=9)
Slide 22
Dorzolamide Enhances OBF in Patients with High-Tension Glaucoma
• No significant effect on systemic blood pressure or heart rate following addition of dorzolamide to timolol
• COSOPT™ significantly accelerated retinal arteriovenous passage time in superior temporal quadrant (p<0.01)
• No effect on choroidal or retrobulbar circulation in either group
Adapted from Harris A et al Am J Ophthalmol 2000;107(3):430-434.
Slide 23
Results of Recent Clinical Studies Suggest
Dorzolamide and Dorzolamide-TimololCombination Improved OBF
• No effects on systemic blood pressure or heart rate with dorzolamide
• Accelerated AVP time in NTG and POAG
• Improved OPA and POBF in POAG
OPD=ocular perfusion dynamics; AVP=arteriovenous passage time; NTG=normal-tension glaucoma; POAG=primary open-angle glaucoma; OPA=ocular pulse amplitude; POBF=pulsatile ocular blood flow
Adapted from Harris A et al J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1999;15(3):189-197; Harris A et al Ophthalmology 2000;107(3):430-434; Harris A et al Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132:490-495; Schmidt K-G et al Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82(7):758-762.
Slide 24
Summary of CO•REGULATION™
The simultaneous and active alteration of two control systems within the eye in glaucoma
• Mechanical: Decreased IOP
• Vascular: Increased OBF
Adapted from Alward WLM Glaucoma: The Requisites in Ophthalmology. St. Louis: Mosby, 2000.
OBFIOP
Slide 25
COSOPT™: Pharmacology
• Dorzolamide 2%– Inhibition of CAII activity (critical to aqueous
humor production)– Decrease in aqueous humor production and
consequent lowering of IOP
• Timolol 0.5%– Decrease in aqueous humor production by blockade
of ciliary beta-adrenergic receptors
CA=carbonic anhydrase
Adapted from Sharir M. In Textbook of Ocular Pharmacology. 1997:287-290; Shields MB Textbook of Glaucoma. 1998.
Slide 26
COSOPT™: Indications
COSOPT is indicated in the treatment of elevated IOP in patients with
• Ocular hypertension
• Open-angle glaucoma
• Pseudoexfoliative glaucoma or other secondary
open-angle glaucomas
When concomitant therapy is appropriate
Slide 27
COSOPT™: Contraindications
• Bronchial asthma or a history of bronchial asthma, or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
• Sinus bradycardia, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, overt cardiac failure, or cardiogenic shock
• Hypersensitivity to any component of COSOPT
Source C(WPC),p 1, §IV
Slide 28
Adverse Experiences with COSOPT™
• In clinical trials– None specific to COSOPT
The same adverse experiences as the individual components– Most mild and did not cause discontinuation– Most frequent drug-related: ocular burning/stinging, taste
perversion, corneal erosion, conjunctival injection, blurred vision, tearing, ocular itching
– Rare: urolithiasis– Low discontinuation rates in clinical trials
• In postmarketing experience– Dyspnea, respiratory failure, contact dermatitis
Slide 29
Precautions with COSOPT™
• Adequately control cardiac failure before initiation of therapy
• Monitor patients with a history of severe cardiac disease for signs of cardiac failure
• Avoid use in patients with severe renal impairment and patients receiving oral CAIs
• Use with caution in patients with hepatic impairment and a history of atopy or of severe anaphylactic reactions
• Consider discontinuation if local adverse effects are observed during therapy
• Monitor for additive effects on IOP or on known systemic effects of beta blockade in patients receiving systemic beta blockers
Slide 30
Dosage and Administration/How Supplied
Dosage and Administration
• One drop of COSOPT™ in the affected eye(s) twice daily
How Supplied
• Supplied in 5 ml OCUMETER™ PLUS dispensers
OCUMETERTM PLUS ophthalmic dispenser is a trademark of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA.
Slide 31
COSOPT™ in the Patient-Friendly OCUMETER™ PLUS Dispenser
Large capIs easy to openand close
Large bottleIs easy to hold,squeeze, and control
Color-coded capMakes it easy to identify medication
Transparent bottleMakes medicationlevel visible so patientknows when to refill
Slide 32
Clinical Experience with COSOPT™
• In clinical practice– Available in 55 countries– Available for 5 years– Proven therapy—more than 23.6 million patient-
months of treatment with COSOPT
Data on file, MSD.
Slide 33
Conclusions
• “Attention to IOP reduction remains important, but does not address all mechanisms present within many POAG patients… medication(s) must also increase perfusion to the eye.” K.-G. Schmidt*
• “In summary, the main finding in the present study was that dorzolamide induces changes in ocular and periocular hemodynamics, improving blood perfusion of the eye.” A. Martinez**
*Schmidt K-G. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82(7):758-762.**Martinez A. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40(6):1270-1275.
Slide 34
References
Please refer to note page.
Slide 35
References (cont’d)
Please refer to note page.
Slide 36
Comprehensive Glaucoma Management with COSOPT™
Copyright © 2003 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA.
All rights reserved. 5-04 CST 2003-W-6191-SS Printed in USA
VISIT US ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB AT http://www.merck.com