six sigma deployment
TRANSCRIPT
D
M
A
I
C
ASQ Section 1508 St. Petersburg / Tampa DINNER MEETING Monday
Bringing a Stalled Six Sigma Initiative Back to Lifeby Peter Peterka
Tampa DINNER MEETING Monday, March 9, 2009
1
To receive a copy of the presentation send an email to [email protected]
Objectives
• Give a brief history of the Six Sigma methodology• Provide a summary of the principles for
implementing Six Sigma in a business• How to restart a stalled or inactive initiative• Getting engagement from organizational leaders by
implementing Business Process Charting
2 SixSigma.us March 2009
p g g
• 71% of projects fail each year• They take 84% more time than planned • They cost 56% more money than planned• They achieve 93% of what they set out to
deliver (falling to 67% on projects that are delayed or over budget)
Project Failure Stats
3 SixSigma.us March 2009
delayed or over budget)• 0.5% of project managers admit to working on
failed projects
Why should Six Sigma be any different?- Peter Peterka
Common Mistakes• Thinking the key to Six Sigma is Statistics, Statistics,
Statistics - NO! IT IS A MANAGEMENT SYSTEM !!!• Overemphasis on Cost Reduction • Failure to address improvement as part of the job• Ignoring team dynamics as a cause of project failures• Overreliance on the Black Belt, Six Sigma equals projects
4 SixSigma.us March 2009
• Not understanding common cause vs. special cause variation
• Failure to apply the concept of the customer internally• Recognizing management’s involvement not just
commitment• Ignoring the management of change
Change is never easy but not always bad….
5 SixSigma.us March 2009
An Overview of Six Sigma – Why?• Six Sigma is a business strategy and methodology• Six Sigma creates Breakthrough Performance• Six Sigma saves money• Six Sigma improves a company’s value in the eye of
their customer:– Reduced Cost
6 SixSigma.us March 2009
– Improved Delivery– Faster and more on target New Products
• Six Sigma applies to all organizations and processes
“The problems we face cannot be solved with the same thinking that created them.”
-Albert Einstein
An Overview of Six Sigma – What?
• Breakthrough Improvement• Systematic and Focused Approach• Right Projects• Right People• Right Project Management• Methodology for Sustaining The Gains
7 SixSigma.us March 2009
• Methodology for Sustaining The Gains• Right Results• Process Thinking• Right Place / Right Time from Walmart MBB
A History Lesson
• Infancy– In 1984 Motorola developed the concept of Six Sigma
performance– They had major issues in Manufacturing and
Assembly with the focus on defect reduction– There was a lot of training on great tools but limited
insight on application
8 SixSigma.us March 2009
insight on application– Texas Instruments, Kodak, others tried later to
implement
A History Lesson
• Adolescence– In the mid-1990’s AlliedSignal and GE popularized the
method– A variety of roadmaps are developed with varying
tools to apply for process improvement– The focus changed from defect reduction to ROI
S ff t t t d t d li ti t D i
9 SixSigma.us March 2009
– Some efforts started towards application to Design and Service functions, especially in GE
– Ford, DuPont, 3M, Dow Chemical are other follow-ons in these efforts
A History Lesson
• Young Adulthood– Focus begins to change to focus on application to
major financial contributors to the business, not just for operations or individual functions
– Defined roadmaps are developed for development of new product offerings and servicesGE focuses majority of it’s efforts on Non
10 SixSigma.us March 2009
– GE focuses majority of it’s efforts on Non-Manufacturing / Services, Financial services
– Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, American Express enter into the game
A History Lesson
• Adulthood– Focus changes to value generation for the entire
business – a corporate initiative, not just a ‘quality thing’
– Roadmaps are defined separately for Development efforts (DFSS) and Process Improvement (DMAIC)Integration of Lean practices and tools becomes more
11 SixSigma.us March 2009
– Integration of Lean practices and tools becomes more widely visible
– Applications to government, military, health care, hotels, and other businesses continues to rise
Why ‘do’ Six Sigma?• It should be identified as a business strategy for improvement
and value generation• It’s focus is on providing breakthrough performance• It can aid in saving money• It can improve a company’s value in the eye of their customers
and shareholders through:– Reduced cost– Improved delivery performance
12 SixSigma.us March 2009
Improved delivery performance– Reduced warranty claims and costs– Improved and on-target new offerings (products and
services)• The application to all processes in all organizations
Transforming Business Decisions
Issues Methods used to solve problems
1. Simple, non critical, easily reversed
2. Following trends, minor changes in processes, could be reversed if necessary
3. Differences between groups, major process h h diffi l
Feelings
Simple Problem Solving Tools
Process Analysis
13 SixSigma.us March 2009
changes, changes difficult to reverse
4. Major process changes or large capital expense, changes nearly impossible to reverse
Complex analysisDOE, Regression
Process AnalysisTools & Methodology
Change the methods used to make decisions from feelings to the use of data
The DMAIC Methodology
Define
Measure How are we doing?
What is important?
14 SixSigma.us March 2009
Analyze
Improve
Control How do we guarantee performance?
What needs to be done?
What is wrong?
Tools in the Funneling of X’sY = f (X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7…Xn) Project Y
Process MapC&E Matrix
MSA
PM identifies process And potential savings
C&E prioritizes inputs
MSA on X’s assures can be controlled
Project Charter
Process Maps
Define
Measure
Analyze
15 SixSigma.us March 2009
Control PlansSPC
The Roadmap “funnels” down the Xs from the trivial many to a “vital few” - the Red Xs
Y = f (X5 , X22, X37)
DOE
Multi-VariFMEA FMEA reduces variation and
effects for “inputs gone wrong”
Multi-Vari identifies Noise variables and reduces the X’s for DOE
DOEs identify the Critical Xs and their relationship to the Y
Improve
ControlDevelop controls for Critical Xs to
maintain performance of the Y
Financial Control Model
12 Month Financial Control Period12 Month Financial Control Period2211 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 1010 1111 12124 4 -- 66332211 11 22 33 44 55 6611 22 33 4 4 -- 66 77 88 99 1010 1111 1212
?
Implement Implement ImprovementsImprovements
16 SixSigma.us March 2009
2 Month Financial Review
6 Month6 MonthFinancialFinancial
ReviewReview
Report Quick WinsReport Quick Wins
12 Month Financial Review12 Month Financial Review
Key Lessons for Leaders
First…1. A compelling reason for change must be articulated2. Leadership team must be trained, and must believe
that Lean Six Sigma is the solution, and drive projectsThen…
3. Select the best people to become Black Belts
17 SixSigma.us March 2009
p p4. Assign critical mass of Black Belts full time 5. Projects driven by strategy6. Institutionalize by transferring training and coaching
initiative from Consultant to internal organization
What is Crucial for Success?
• Demand for breakthrough improvement• A systematic and focused approach• Selection of the right projects• Training and holding accountable the right people• Management leadershipleadership for implementation of project
findings
18 SixSigma.us March 2009
• Project management to drive projects to completion• Controls and conformance for sustaining the gains• Driving for the right business results, financial or other• Acceptance of process thinking throughout the business
Six Sigma Success Factors• The bottom line focus and big dollar impact
– Encourages and maintains top management commitment• The emphasis on - and consistent use of - a unified and
quantitative approach to process improvement– The DMAIC methodology provides a common language so
that experiences and successes can be shared through the organizationC t th t d i i h ld b b d
19 SixSigma.us March 2009
– Creates awareness that decisions should be based on factual data
• The emphasis on understanding & satisfying customer needs– Creates focus on doing the right things right– Anecdotal information is replaced by factual data
• The combination of the right projects, the right people and the right tools– Careful selection of projects and people combined with
hands on training in using statistical tools in real projects
Deployment Principles That Always Work – Critical Success Factors
1. A Sense of Urgency for change must exist2.Strategically align and connect business metrics and Lean Six
Sigma metrics3.Senior organization leaders must be engaged in the process
Line organization owns resources & are accountable for project resultsLean Six Sigma should be integrated into the daily management
20 SixSigma.us March 2009
Lean Six Sigma should be integrated into the daily management practices of the organization
4.Business Leaders own resources & are accountable for project results
5.A strong and respected Command Deployment Champion should report to Senior Leadership
6.Deploy critical mass of key full-time resources (Black Belts, Deployment Directors)
Deployment Principles That Always Work – Critical Success Factors
7. Resources should be selected from “future leaders of the organization”
8. Establish a consistent process for Project Identification and Selection
9. Actively manage Projects-in-Process to reduce/control project lead times
Use Rapid Improvement Events for quick-hit projects
21 SixSigma.us March 2009
Use Rapid Improvement Events for quick-hit projects10.Track results rigorously: Lean Six Sigma results should “pay as
you go” and be confirmed by objective parties11.Black Belts/Green Belts must have team leadership skills12.Integrate with other initiatives where applicable
TWENTY KEY LESSONS LEARNED
1. The time is right.2. The enthusiastic commitment of top management is
critical.3. Develop an infrastructure.4. Commit top people.5 Invest in relevant hands-on training
22 SixSigma.us March 2009
Gerald J. Hahn, “20 Key Lessons Learned,” Six Sigma Forum Magazine, May 2002, pages 28-34.
5. Invest in relevant hands-on training.6. Select initial projects to build credibility quickly.7. Make it all pervasive, and involve everybody.8. Emphasize DFSS.9. Don’t forget design for reliability.10.Focus on the entire system.
TWENTY KEY LESSONS LEARNED
11.Emphasize customer CTQs (critical to quality).12. Include commercial quality improvement.13.Recognize all savings.14.Customize to meet business needs.15.Consider the variability as well as the mean.16.Plan to get the right data.
23 SixSigma.us March 2009
Gerald J. Hahn, “20 Key Lessons Learned,” Six Sigma Forum Magazine, May 2002, pages 28-34.
g g17.Beware of dogmatism.18.Avoid nonessential bureaucracy.19.Keep the tool box vital.20.Expect Six Sigma to become a more silent partner.
Secretariat 1973 Belmont Stakes "The Photo"
24 SixSigma.us March 2009
Business Process Charting
• A graphical and numerical analysis method for any type of business process data used for insight into understanding and improvement of business results.
• Based upon Statistical Thinking Theory
25 SixSigma.us March 2009
• Directed toward identifying opportunities for improving business results
• A way to engage business leaders!
Peter Peterka
Key Elements of Business Process Charts
1. Business Metric number with operational definition
2. Process Owner Labeled on Chart3. Business Data Plotted over time often monthly4. Business Goal Marker
26 SixSigma.us March 2009
5. Statistical Based Limits often based on Individual and Moving Range to start
Peter Peterka
Key Elements of Business Process Chart
Metric 1.42
1. Name and number of Business Metric:
2. Process Owner
5. Statistical Limits
27 SixSigma.us March 2009
3. Business Data Plot Overview time often monthly
4. Business Goal
How to: Determine the Proper Metrics
• Actual Process Map of Business Process• Cause and Effect Matrix approach relating metrics
to business goals• Affinity Brainstorming of Metrics• Have each business leader give their 10 “sweat”
t i
28 SixSigma.us March 2009
metrics• Traditional Financial Measures• Customer Measures• Indicators or Predictors of Performance (Xs)
Peter Peterka
Determine the Operational Definition for the Metric
• Definitions that will be interpreted the same way by different people in different situations.
• Same method of calculation• Same method of counting
29 SixSigma.us March 2009
Example of Business Measures:
• Customer Complaints
• Economic Profit• Order Fulfillment• Product Availability• Customer Credits
• % Waste• $$ Waste• Raw Material Costs• Cycle Time• Inventory Turns
30 SixSigma.us March 2009
Customer Credits• Inventory Levels• Delivery Costs• Number of New
Products/Sales $$• Safety
• Premium Freight• IMC Index• DSO• Market Share
All Great Six Sigma Projects!!
Metrics for Six Sigma Implementation
• Percent Projects Completed• Savings from Projects• Percent Projects in Company Database• Percent Course Attendance• Consultant work days
31 SixSigma.us March 2009
• Consultant work days• Instructor Scores• Percent Courses with Correct Material• Six Sigma Billing Errors
The Current Method of Business Analysis
• Summarize business results with a table of numbers.
• Compare to last period, same period last year or goal.
• React to big percent changes; ignore small percent
32 SixSigma.us March 2009
changes.• Focus attention on those portions that are getting
worse.
Three Methods of Analysis
The Goal Approach– Current values are judged to be either
acceptable or not based on comparison with the goal, target, budget limit, etc.
– Alternate between “doing okay” and “in trouble”
“ ”
33 SixSigma.us March 2009
• When “doing okay” ignore it• When “in trouble” take action• On-again, off-again approach is the complete
antithesis of continual improvement.• Goals are useful as a means to improvement,
but when they become the end, to the degree of disrupting improvement, they are a problem!
Three Methods of Analysis
The Average Approach– Compare actual results to average results– Above vs. Below average is not a meaningful
“break point” in performance– Below average months are inevitable– Creates internal comparisons that may not be
34 SixSigma.us March 2009
Creates internal comparisons that may not be either fair or helpful
– Other variations on this approach include:• Best/worst result (there will always be one!)• Best/worst result in X months
Three Methods of Analysis
The Business Process Chart Approach– Results are judged first on whether they
represent a real change in the underlying process (special cause) or not (common cause)The capability of the business process is
35 SixSigma.us March 2009
– The capability of the business process is compared to any goals, targets, etc.
“To Measure or Not to Measure”
Raw Monthly Number: $, Total, %Aggregate NumbersPercent to Sales or Similar Business RatioMix of Monthly and Year to DatePercent Change
36 SixSigma.us March 2009
g% Change vs. Same Month Last YearYear to Date Percent IncreaseTake Care with Accounting Accruals/Adjustments
Benefits of Business Process Charting
• Improve Business Results• Make better predictions, improve credibility• Detecting real trends not “phantom”• Learn more about processes• Ask more helpful questions
37 SixSigma.us March 2009
p q• Identify chronic opportunities for Six Sigma• Engage Champions more in Six Sigma
Statistical Thinking is ....
• A philosophy of learning and action based on the following fundamental principles:– All work occurs in a system of interconnected
processes,– Variation exists in all processes, and
38 SixSigma.us March 2009
– Understanding and reducing variation are keys to success.
• A Way of Thinking
Benefits of Statistical Thinking
• Strengthens the connection between improving the business and improving the business process
• Improve predictability and credibility• Defines the appropriate direction for action• Focuses scarce resources on the right issues
L f t b t
39 SixSigma.us March 2009
• Learn faster about processes• Engaging Champions more in Six Sigma
What Action is Appropriate?
Impo
rtan
t
40 SixSigma.us March 2009
Last Period This Period
Som
ethi
ng I
It Depends!
What is happening to me? What happened to me?
41 SixSigma.us March 2009
Common-Cause and Special-Cause Variation
• From Common Causes– Systemic, Chronic, Built-in Variation
• From Special Causes– Sporadic, Exceptional, Atypical Variation
42 SixSigma.us March 2009
Sporadic, Exceptional, Atypical Variation
The Special and Common Cause Spectrum
MassiveSpecialCause
CommonCauses
Only
The Real World
43 SixSigma.us March 2009
Cause Only
It is important to know, at any point in time, which type of variation is dominant.
Appropriate Type of Action
• If special causes dominant– Isolate and address the special cause(s)– Don’t over-fix
• If common causes dominant– Make a permanent change to the
44 SixSigma.us March 2009
p gsystem
– Don’t tamper after at each data point
Business Metric with Special Cause
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
85
90E A A
CESpecial Cause Flag
45 SixSigma.us March 2009
Weather in Houston
60
65
70
75
80
Nov-
97
Jan-
98
Mar-9
8
May-
98
Jul-9
8
Sep-
98
Nov-
98
Jan-
99
Mar-9
9
May-
99
Jul-9
9
Sep-
99
Nov-
99
Jan-
00
Mar-0
0
May-
00
Jul-0
0
Sep-
00
Nov-
00
Jan-
01
Mar-0
1
Month
Indi
vidu
al V
alue
New Product Growth
2000
2500
3000
46 SixSigma.us March 2009
0
500
1000
1500
May
-99
Jun
-99
Jul-
99
Au
g-9
9
Sep
-99
Oct
-99
Nov
-99
Dec
-99
Jan
-00
Feb-
00
Mar
-00
Apr
-00
May
-00
Jun
-00
Jul-
00
Au
g-0
0
Sep
-00
Oct
-00
Nov
-00
Dec
-00
Jan
-01
Feb-
01
Mar
-01
Apr
-01
May
-01
New Product Growth
2000
2500
3000
47 SixSigma.us March 2009
0
500
1000
1500
May
-99
Jun
-99
Jul-
99
Au
g-9
9
Sep
-99
Oct
-99
Nov
-99
Dec
-99
Jan
-00
Feb-
00
Mar
-00
Apr
-00
May
-00
Jun
-00
Jul-
00
Au
g-0
0
Sep
-00
Oct
-00
Nov
-00
Dec
-00
Jan
-01
Feb-
01
Mar
-01
Apr
-01
May
-01
Growth Line
New Product Growth
2000
2500
3000
Goal
48 SixSigma.us March 2009
0
500
1000
1500
May
-99
Jun
-99
Jul-
99
Au
g-9
9
Sep
-99
Oct
-99
Nov
-99
Dec
-99
Jan
-00
Feb-
00
Mar
-00
Apr
-00
May
-00
Jun
-00
Jul-
00
Au
g-0
0
Sep
-00
Oct
-00
Nov
-00
Dec
-00
Jan
-01
Feb-
01
Mar
-01
Apr
-01
May
-01
Growth Line
Forecast
AMERICAN
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
Nov-
97
Jan-
98
Mar
-98
May-9
8
Jul-9
8
Sep-
98
Nov-
98
Jan-
99
Mar
-99
May-9
9
Jul-9
9
Sep-
99
Nov-
99
Jan-
00
Mar
-00
May-0
0
Jul-0
0
Sep-
00
Nov-
00
Jan-
01
Mar
-01
CONTINENTAL
80
85
903 UpBPChart
St Ch
49 SixSigma.us March 2009
60
65
70
75
Nov-
97
Jan-
98
Mar
-98
May-9
8
Jul-9
8
Sep-
98
Nov-
98
Jan-
99
Mar
-99
May-9
9
Jul-9
9
Sep-
99
Nov-
99
Jan-
00
Mar
-00
May-0
0
Jul-0
0
Sep-
00
Nov-
00
Jan-
01
Mar
-01
SOUTHWEST
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
Nov-
97
Jan-
98
Mar
-98
May-9
8
Jul-9
8
Sep-
98
Nov-
98
Jan-
99
Mar
-99
May-9
9
Jul-9
9
Sep-
99
Nov-
99
Jan-
00
Mar
-00
May-0
0
Jul-0
0
Sep-
00
Nov-
00
Jan-
01
Mar
-01
Step Change
9 UpBPChart
AMERICA WEST
505560657075808590
Nov-9
7
Feb-
98
May
-98
Aug-
98
Nov-9
8
Feb-
99
May
-99
Aug-
99
Nov-9
9
Feb-
00
May
-00
Aug-
00
Nov-0
0
Feb-
01
AMERICAN
505560657075808590
Nov-9
7
Feb-
98
May
-98
Aug-
98
Nov-9
8
Feb-
99
May
-99
Aug-
99
Nov-9
9
Feb-
00
May
-00
Aug-
00
Nov-0
0
Feb-
01
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
Weather in Houston
505560657075808590
Nov-9
7
Feb-
98
May
-98
Aug-
98
Nov-9
8
Feb-
99
May
-99
Aug-
99
Nov-9
9
Feb-
00
May
-00
Aug-
00
Nov-0
0
Feb-
01
DELTA
75808590
NORTHWEST
75808590
SOUTHWEST
75808590
50 SixSigma.us March 2009
505560657075
Nov-9
7
Feb-
98
May
-98
Aug-
98
Nov-9
8
Feb-
99
May
-99
Aug-
99
Nov-9
9
Feb-
00
May
-00
Aug-
00
Nov-0
0
Feb-
01
505560657075
Nov-9
7
Feb-
98
May
-98
Aug-
98
Nov-9
8
Feb-
99
May
-99
Aug-
99
Nov-9
9
Feb-
00
May
-00
Aug-
00
Nov-0
0
Feb-
01
505560657075
Nov-9
7
Feb-
98
May
-98
Aug-
98
Nov-9
8
Feb-
99
May
-99
Aug-
99
Nov-9
9
Feb-
00
May
-00
Aug-
00
Nov-0
0
Feb-
01
TWA
505560657075808590
Nov-9
7
Feb-
98
May
-98
Aug-
98
Nov-9
8
Feb-
99
May
-99
Aug-
99
Nov-9
9
Feb-
00
May
-00
Aug-
00
Nov-0
0
Feb-
01
UNITED
505560657075808590
Nov-9
7
Feb-
98
May
-98
Aug-
98
Nov-9
8
Feb-
99
May
-99
Aug-
99
Nov-9
9
Feb-
00
May
-00
Aug-
00
Nov-0
0
Feb-
01
US AIR
505560657075808590
Nov-9
7
Feb-
98
May
-98
Aug-
98
Nov-9
8
Feb-
99
May
-99
Aug-
99
Nov-9
9
Feb-
00
May
-00
Aug-
00
Nov-0
0
Feb-
01
Business Data versus Manufacturing Data
Business Manufacturingvsvsvsvsvs
FrequentOften monthly
Trends often desired
Often individual values
Lack operational definitions
By the hour or shiftNo trends desired
Individual and subgroups
Often clearly defined
Collected infrequently
51 SixSigma.us March 2009
Peter Peterka
vsvsvsvs
More difficult to experimentEasy to obtain measurement error
Lack operational definitionsDifficult to quantify error
Often time correlated data
Often clearly defined
Easy to experimentData can be corrected correlation
Becoming an “Statistical Thinker”
• Be able to explain to others the meaning of performance within the process limits
• Use data to understand the future rather than explain the past
• Get results by improving the process• Use thinking always with data
L h t l i th b f d t i it ti th t
52 SixSigma.us March 2009
• Learn how to apply in the absence of data in situations that call for judgment
• Control Chart your data• Avoid two point comparisons• Require and teach others to employ
Determine Business Goals
Obtain 24 Month History
Leadership 2 Day Statistical Thinking Workshop
Business Leaders Meet Quarterly to Select Improvement Projects Identified on
Roadmap to Implement Business Process Charts
53 SixSigma.us March 2009
Determine Key Business Metrics
Refine Operational Definitions
Thinking Workshop – Refine Metrics and Drill Downs
Process Owners with Improvement Specialists support establish initial limits
”Chronic” Common Cause Opportunities
Continue to Monitor Business Metrics in Chart Form – Make Sure to Identify Special Causes
Peter Peterka
Closing Thoughts
“Being committed to the truth is far more powerful than any technique”
Peter Senge
“The most important figures that one needs in management are unknown or unknowable, but successful management must nevertheless take account of them”.
54 SixSigma.us March 2009
Dr. W. Edwards Deming
“If we know how to manage with data, then we can learn how better to manage without data”
Heero Hacquebord
Contact Information
• Instructor Information– Phone:– Preferred Email:
• SixSigma.us General Information– Phone: + 1 817-886-4950 – Preferred Email: [email protected]
55 SixSigma.us March 2009
@ g
• SixSigma.us– Peter Peterka– Phone: + 1 512-415-3697– Preferred Email: [email protected]
To receive a copy of the presentation send an email to [email protected]
Time to Drive Work
56 SixSigma.us March 2009
Traditional Economic Model of Quality of Conformance
Total cost
57 SixSigma.us March 2009
Cost due to nonconformance
Cost of quality assurance
“optimal level” of quality100%