simulation experiments for geo-cape regional air quality geo-cape workshop september 22, 2009 peter...
TRANSCRIPT
Simulation Experiments for GEO-CAPE Regional Air Quality
GEO-CAPE WorkshopSeptember 22, 2009Peter Zoogman, Daniel J. Jacob, Kelly Chance, Lin Zhang, Philippe Le Sager, Arlene Fiore
This work is supported by the NASA Atmospheric Composition Modeling and Analysis Program
Observing System Simulation Experiment
a priori = GEOS-Chem model
“Truth” = MOZART model
a posteriori = GEOS-Chem + assimilation of synthetic observations attempt to reproduce true atmosphere
Developed OSSE capability for regional scale problems
First application is to determine GEO-CAPE measurement requirements for surface ozone
Simulation ModelsSevere test due to opposite biases at 700 hPa and surface
MOZART (1.9o x1.9o , NCEP) GEOS-Chem (1o x1o , GEOS-3) “Truth” a priori
JULY 2001
700 hPa
Below 1 km
ppbv
MethodsSynthetic Observations – apply averaging kernel to “truth”Remove cloudy scenes
Data Assimilation – Kalman FilterIncludes spatial covariance of 1 km in vertical, 300 km in horizontal (will be informed by sensitivity team)
Error is evolved and transported as a passive tracer
Model Error computed by comparison to ozonesondeGEOS-Chem error found to be 25%
Instrument smoothing error assumed to be diagonal, 10%
TES O3 AK North American 1o x1o
Nested Grid
Results at 700 hPaGEOS-Chem mean absolute bias: 7.4 + 4.1 ppbv
GEOS-Chem + Hourly Obs: 2.7 + 2.0 ppbv
Hourly observations (daytime clear-sky only) provide successful correction, much better than daily observations
Mean July 2001 Ozone
GEOS-Chem + Daily Obs: 5.6 + 3.5 ppbv
ppbv
Results below 1 kmGEOS-Chem mean absolute bias: 4.3 + 3.3 ppbv
Mean July 2001 Ozone
GEOS-Chem + Hourly Obs: 3.4 + 2.7 ppbv
GEOS-Chem + Daily Obs: 4.1 + 3.0 ppbv
TES sensitivity to boundary layer is insufficient to correct model significantly at the surface --need to do better to inform ozone surface air quality
ppbv
Sensitivity by Adjoint Adjoint model – receptor based rather than source based approach
Sensitivity of surface ozone to ozone produced at each vertical layer – tool to understand OSSE results
Surface ozone primarily sensitive to production below 2 km; this supports simulation results
Accumulated surface O3 sensitivity for Boston
Summary and Future WorkTIR measurements not sufficient for boundary layer ozoneMultispectral is needed!
Developed a framework for testing prospective instrumentation – can be applied as new sensor configurations are proposedFrequency of observations, observation domain, nighttime observations
GEOS-Chem resolution will increase – 10 km by end 2010
Use CMAQ ozone for higher resolution/different “truth”
Integration of surface sitesPerform forecasting OSSEsExpand to combine observations of other species
NOx, CO, HCHORequired frequency may be different for different species
Define requirements for climate forcing and intercontinental transport