simchi-levi chapter 5

43
The Value of Information Chap 05 王王王 王王王王 王王王王王王王王王王王王 ©Copyright 2001 王王王王王王王王

Upload: yusuf-mahomed

Post on 14-Mar-2016

245 views

Category:

Documents


9 download

DESCRIPTION

Chap 05 The Value of Information ©Copyright 2001 Reading: 1. Barilla SpA, Harvard Business School, 9-694-046 1) Barilla SpA Part A, B, and C 2) The Bullwhip Effect 4) Effect Forecasts 5) Information for Coordination of Systems 6) Locating Desired Products 7) Lead Time Reduction 8) Integrating the Supply Chain

TRANSCRIPT

  • The Value of Information

    Chap 05 Copyright 2001

  • Lecture Outline1) Barilla SpA Part A, B, and C2) The Bullwhip Effect4) Effect Forecasts5) Information for Coordination of Systems6) Locating Desired Products7) Lead Time Reduction8) Integrating the Supply ChainReading:1. Barilla SpA, Harvard Business School, 9-694-046

  • Barilla SpA Part ABarilla SpA is the worlds largest pasta manufacturerThe company sells to a wide range of Italian retailers, primarily through third party distributorsDuring the late 1980s, Barilla suffered increasing operational inefficiencies and cost penalties that resulted from large week-to-week variations in its distributors order patterns

  • Figure 4.2

  • Figure 4.3 Weekly Demand for Barilla Dry Products from Corteses Northeast Distribution Center to the Pedrignano CDC, 1989.

  • What exactly is causing the distributors order pattern to look this way? What are the underlying drivers of the fluctuations?

  • Causes for Demand FluctuationsTransportation discountsVolume discountPromotional activityNo minimum or maximum order quantitiesProduct proliferationLong order lead timesPoor customer service ratesPoor communication

  • Barilla SpA Part A (continued)To address this problem, the director of logistics suggests the implementation of Just-in-Time Distribution (JITD), with Barillas distributors.Under the proposed JITD system, decision-making authority for determining shipments from Barilla to a distributor would transfer from the distributor to Barilla.Specifically, rather than simply filling orders specified by the distributor, Barilla would monitor the flow of its product through the distributors warehouse, and then decide what to ship to the distributor and when to ship it.

  • Evaluation of the JITD ProposalClearly the variation in demand is imposing additional costs on the channel. What do you think of the JITD proposal as a mechanism for reducing these costs?Why should this work?How does it work?What makes Barilla think that it can do a better job of determining a good product/delivery sequence than its distributors?

  • Implementation Issues Resistance from the DistributorsManaging stock is my job; I dont need you to see my warehouse or my figures.I could improve my inventory and service level myself if you would deliver my orders more quickly; I would place my order and you would deliver within 36 hours.We would be giving Barilla the power to push products into our warehouse just so that Barilla can reduce its costs.?

  • Implementation Issues Resistance from Sales and Marketing (1/2)Our sales levels would flatten if we put this program in place.How can we get the trade to push Barilla product to retailers if we dont offer some sort of incentive?If space is freed up in our distributors warehouses, the distributors would then push our competitors product more than ours.It seems that the distribution organization is not yet ready to handle such a sophisticated relationship.

  • Implementation Issues Resistance from Sales and Marketing (2/2)We run the risk of not being able to adjust our shipments sufficiently quickly to changes in selling patterns or increased promotions.We increase the risk of having our customers stock out of our product if we have disruption in our supply process.We wouldnt be able to run trade promotions with JITD.It is not clear that costs would even be reduced.

  • How Can MaggialiSolve the Implementation Problems?Demonstrate that JITD benefits the distributors (lowering inventory, improving their service levels and increasing their returns on assets); Run experiment at one or more of Barillas 18 depotsMaggiali needs to look at JITD not as a logistics program, but as a company-wide effort; Get top management closely involvedTrust

  • Barilla SpA Part BWhat did Barilla learn from the experiments in Florence and Milan? (Fig 4.9 & 4.10)How should Barilla change the way it attempts to sell the JITD concept to its distributors?If you were a Barilla distributor, would you sign onto the program after seeing these results?

  • Figure 4.9

  • Figure 4.10

  • Figure 4.11

  • Figure 4.12

  • Barilla SpA Part CHow do you evaluate the implementation process Barilla used with Cortese?Figure 4.11Figure 4.12

  • The Bullwhip Effect and its Impact on the Supply ChainConsider the order pattern of a single color television model sold by a large electronics manufacturer to one of its accounts, a national retailer.Figure 1. Order StreamHuang at el. (1996), Working paper, Philips Lab

  • Figure 2. Point-of-sales Data-OriginalFigure 3. POS Data After Removing PromotionsThe Bullwhip Effect and its Impact on the Supply Chain

  • Figure 4. POS Data After Removing Promotion & TrendThe Bullwhip Effectand its Impact on the Supply Chain

  • Higher Variability in Orders Placed by Computer Retailer to Manufacturer Than Actual SalesLee, H, P. Padmanabhan and S. Wang (1997), Sloan Management Review

  • Increasing Variability of Orders Up the Supply ChainLee, H, P. Padmanabhan and S. Wang (1997), Sloan Management Review

  • We Conclude .Order Variability is amplified up the supply chain; upstream echelons face higher variability.

    What you see is not what they face.

  • The Causes of Bullwhip Effect Demand ForecastLong lead timesOrder Batching Price fluctuation (Promotional sales)Inflated orders- IBM Aptiva orders increased by 2-3 times when retailers thought that IBM would be out of stock over Christmas- Same with Motorolas Cellular phones

  • Single retailer, single manufacturer.Retailer observes customer demand, Dt.Retailer orders qt from manufacturer.Lead time = L.

    What are the Causes.RetailerManufacturerDtqtL

  • The Bullwhip Effect

  • Var(q)/Var(D):For Various Lead TimesL=5L=3L=102468101214051015202530L=5L=3L=1

  • Multi-Stage Supply ChainsConsider a multi-stage supply chain: Stage i places order qi to stage i+1.Li is lead time between stage i and i+1.

    RetailerStage 1Manufacturer Stage 2Supplier Stage 3qo=Dq1q2L1L2

  • Formula

  • Multi-Stage Systems:Var(qk)/Var(D)Dec, k=5Cen, k=5Dec, k=3Cen, k=3 k=1

    Sheet1

    k33551

    L11111

    pC k=3D k=3C k=5D k=5k=1

    356.73936899869.888888888924.04540297041.8888888889

    43.6254.2910156256.62511.33096313481.625

    52.923.24179257.10082119681.48

    62.52.67918381344.05555555565.16817865251.3888888889

    72.22448979592.33427398453.44897959184.10758333381.3265306122

    82.031252.1033020023.031253.45278385281.28125

    91.88888888891.93869310052.72839506173.01426738571.2469135802

    101.781.8158482.52.70270816321.22

    111.6942148761.7208693352.32231404962.47122995481.1983471074

    121.6251.64535375942.18055555562.29314832411.1805555556

    131.56804733731.58393941012.06508875742.15227423991.1656804734

    141.52040816331.53305276711.96938775512.03827059391.1530612245

    151.481.49022489991.88888888891.94425411181.1422222222

    161.44531251.45369768141.82031251.86547813431.1328125

    171.41522491351.42218650931.76124567471.79857101871.124567474

    181.38888888891.39473172941.70987654321.74107629121.1172839506

    191.36565096951.37060247631.66481994461.69116449991.1108033241

    201.3451.3492326251.6251.64744676591.105

    &A

    Page &P

    Sheet1

    56.73936899869.888888888924.0454029704

    3.6254.2910156256.62511.3309631348

    2.923.24179257.1008211968

    2.52.67918381344.05555555565.1681786525

    2.22448979592.33427398453.44897959184.1075833338

    2.031252.1033020023.031253.4527838528

    1.88888888891.93869310052.72839506173.0142673857

    1.781.8158482.52.7027081632

    1.6942148761.7208693352.32231404962.4712299548

    1.6251.64535375942.18055555562.2931483241

    1.56804733731.58393941012.06508875742.1522742399

    1.52040816331.53305276711.96938775512.0382705939

    1.481.49022489991.88888888891.9442541118

    1.44531251.45369768141.82031251.8654781343

    1.41522491351.42218650931.76124567471.7985710187

    1.38888888891.39473172941.70987654321.7410762912

    1.36565096951.37060247631.66481994461.6911644999

    1.3451.3492326251.6251.6474467659

    &A

    Page &P

    C k=3

    D k=3

    C k=5

    D k=5

    Sheet2

    56.73936899869.888888888924.0454029704

    3.6254.2910156256.62511.3309631348

    2.923.24179257.1008211968

    2.52.67918381344.05555555565.1681786525

    2.22448979592.33427398453.44897959184.1075833338

    2.031252.1033020023.031253.4527838528

    1.88888888891.93869310052.72839506173.0142673857

    1.781.8158482.52.7027081632

    1.6942148761.7208693352.32231404962.4712299548

    1.6251.64535375942.18055555562.2931483241

    1.56804733731.58393941012.06508875742.1522742399

    1.52040816331.53305276711.96938775512.0382705939

    1.481.49022489991.88888888891.9442541118

    1.44531251.45369768141.82031251.8654781343

    1.41522491351.42218650931.76124567471.7985710187

    1.38888888891.39473172941.70987654321.7410762912

    1.36565096951.37060247631.66481994461.6911644999

    1.3451.3492326251.6251.6474467659

    &A

    Page &P

    C k=3

    D k=3

    C k=5

    D k=5

    Sheet3

    &A

    Page &P

    C k=3

    D k=3

    C k=5

    D k=5

    k=1

    Sheet4

    &A

    Page &P

    Sheet5

    &A

    Page &P

    Sheet6

    &A

    Page &P

    Sheet7

    &A

    Page &P

    Sheet8

    &A

    Page &P

    Sheet9

    &A

    Page &P

    Sheet10

    &A

    Page &P

    Sheet11

    &A

    Page &P

    Sheet12

    &A

    Page &P

    Sheet13

    &A

    Page &P

    Sheet14

    &A

    Page &P

    Sheet15

    &A

    Page &P

    Sheet16

    &A

    Page &P

    &A

    Page &P

    &A

    Page &P

  • The Bullwhip Effect:Managerial InsightsExists, in part, due to the retailers need to estimate the mean and variance of demand.The increase in variability is an increasing function of the lead time.The more complicated the demand models and the forecasting techniques, the greater the increase.Centralized demand information can reduce the bullwhip effect, but will not eliminate it.

  • Coping with the Bullwhip EffectReduce Uncertainty- POS- Sharing Information- Centralizing demand informationReduce Variability Year round or Everyday low pricingReduce Lead Times- Information lead times: EDI- Order lead times: Cross DockingAlliance ArrangementsVendor managed inventory

  • Supply Chain Management:Pitfalls and OpportunitiesConflicting Objectives in the Supply Chain1. Purchasing Stable volume requirements Flexible delivery time little variation in mix large quantities2. Manufacturing Long run production High quality High productivity Low production cost

  • Supply Chain Management:Pitfalls and Opportunities3. Warehousing Low inventory Reduced transportation costs Quick replenishment capability4. Customers Short order lead time High in stock Enormous variety of products Low prices

  • Supply Chain Integration - Dealing with Conflicting GoalsLot Size vs. InventoryInventory vs. TransportationLead Time vs. Transportation CostProduct Variety vs. InventoryCost vs. Customer Service

  • Symptoms of Supply Chain ProblemsStock-outs and High InventoryLong Cycle TimesHigh ReturnsHigh CostsPoor Service Level

  • Common Pitfalls1. Information and Management No Supply Chain Metrics Inadequate Definition of Customer Service Inaccurate Delivery Status Data Inefficient Information Systems2. Operational Control Ignoring the Impact of Uncertainties Simplistic Inventory Stocking Policies Discrimination against Internal Customers Poor Coordination

  • Common Pitfalls 3. Design and Strategy Incomplete Shipment Methods Analysis Incorrect Assessment of Inventory Costs Product and Process Design without SC Consideration Focus on Incomplete Supply Chain

  • Example: Quick Response at BenettonBenetton, the Italian sportswear manufacturer, was founded in 1964. In 1975 Benetton had 200 stores across Italy.Ten years later, the company expanded to the U.S., Japan and Eastern Europe. Sales in 1991 reached 2 trillion.Many attribute Benettons success to successful use of communication and information technologies.

  • Example:Quick Response at BenettonBenetton uses an effective strategy, referred to as Quick Response, in which manufacturing, warehousing, sales and retailers are linked together. In this strategy a Benetton retailer reorders a product through a direct link with Benettons mainframe computer in Italy.Using this strategy, Benetton is capable of shipping a new order in only four weeks, several week earlier than most of its competitors.

  • How Does BenettonCope with the Bullwhip Effect?1. Integrated Information Systems Global EDI network that links agents with production and inventory information EDI order transmission to HQ EDI linkage with air carriers Data linked to manufacturing2. Coordinated Planning Frequent review allows fast reaction Integrated distribution strategy