shallow foundation part 4-in situ testing and settlement on sand

Upload: fatmah-el-wardagy

Post on 12-Apr-2018

234 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    1/33

    Shallow Foundation- In Situ Testing and Settlement on

    Sand

    Dr. Kok Sien Ti

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    2/33

    The main purpose of the test is to provide an indication of the relativedensity of granular deposits, such as sands and gravels from which it isvirtually impossible to obtain undisturbed samples.

    The great merit of the test, and the main reason for its widespread use

    is that it is simple and inexpensive.

    The soil strength parameters which can be inferred are approximate,but may give a useful guide in ground conditions where it may not bepossible to obtain borehole samples of adequate quality like gravels,

    sands, silts, clay containing sand or gravel and weak rock.

    Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    3/33

    In this dynamic test, an open ended split-spoon sampler is driven intothe bottom of a borehole by means of a 65 kg trip hammer fallingthrough 760mm.

    The sampler is initially driven 150mm into the sand to seat the device,

    then the number of blows N to advance the device a further 300mm isrecorded. This is done in 4 increments of 75mm.

    N=Standard Penetration Resistance.

    If testing in gravels, the driving shoe is replaced by a solid 60 cone.

    Procedures

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    4/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    5/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    6/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    7/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    8/33

    Sample SPT logs

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    9/33

    The standard practice now in the U.S. is to express theN-value to anaverage energy ratio of 60% ( N60).

    Thus, correcting for field procedures and on the basis of fieldobservations, it appears reasonable to standardize the field penetrationnumber as a function of the input driving energy and its dissipationaround the sampler into the surrounding soil, or

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    10/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    11/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    12/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    13/33

    Burland and Burbage (1986) Method for

    Settlement

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    14/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    15/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    16/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    17/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    18/33

    Example:

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    19/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    20/33

    Cone Penetration Test (CPT)

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    21/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    22/33

    The tip resistance is theoretically related to undrained shear strength ofa saturated cohesive material, while the sleeve friction is theoreticallyrelated to the friction of the horizon being penetrated (Robertson andCampanella, 1986).

    The local friction measures the average skin friction as the probe isadvanced through the soil.

    The friction ratio is the ratio of skin friction divided by the tipresistance (both in tsf ), given in percent. It is used to classify the soil by

    its behavior or reaction to the cone being forced through the soil.

    Cone Penetration Test (CPT)

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    23/33

    Sample CPT logs

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    24/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    25/33

    Calculating Elastic Settlement on

    Sand from CPT Data

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    26/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    27/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    28/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    29/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    30/33

    Example:

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    31/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    32/33

  • 7/21/2019 Shallow Foundation Part 4-In Situ Testing and Settlement on Sand

    33/33