sgtf-sc meeting 4 december 2015 sgtf-eg3 regulatory ... - reporting eg3 eg1 eg2 - 04.12.2… · 4...

EnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy

SGTF-SC meeting 4 December 2015

SGTF-EG3Regulatory

recommendations

Manuel Sánchez, Ph.D.Team Leader Smart Grids

Directorate for Internal Energy MarketDirectorate General for Energy

European Commission

2/6Dr.-Ing. Manuel Sánchez Jiménez © European Commission 2015 manuel.sanchez–[email protected]

http://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/markets-and-consumers/smart-grids-and-meters

EG3 to deliver regulatory recommendations:

2014-15 EG3 report on DR framework:-Consensus on 14 recommendations (and six refinements) for a possible DR framework

2016 proposal:-Consolidate an EU forum for smart grid regulatory issues on key topics


Table with proposed EG3 workshopsTopic of the event When? Place Organising Committee

Market Design for Demand Response and Self-consumption

2 March

EC or

CEDEC

EC, CEDEC,CEER, EASE,ENTSO-E, ESMIG, Eurelectric, Orgalime, SEDC, COGEN (?),SunPower

Storage, incl. power to gas April EDSO EC, EASE, EDSO, ENTSO-E, Eurogas

Incentives for innovation June ENTSO-E

EC, CEER, ENTSO-E, Euroelectric, SEDC, T&D

Smart Homes/Building Sept.ESMIG & Orgalime

EC, CECED, ECOS, ESMIG, Orgalime,

4Dr. Manuel Sánchez Jiménez © European Commission manuel.sanchez–[email protected]


SGTF-EG1Standards and interoperability

Manuel Sánchez and Dina FiliouTeam Leader Smart Grids

Directorate for Internal Energy MarketDirectorate General for Energy

European Commission


Commission report of 10 October 2014Benchmarking smart metering deployment in the EU-27


2015 EG1 Report on interoperability:-All 17 MS plan to provide reading directly to consumers (USB, web, etc.) -14 MS frequent update readings (85% from EU)-12 MS support advance tariff systems-Majority MS intents to roll-out standardised interfaces, but not improve interoperability

2016 Proposal for work on two streamlines:-Investigate the challenges for "demand response ready"-Prepare the ground for a "Green Button at EU level" to standardised the type and format of consumer data

Positive evolution since the benchmarking study in 2014

DSF Interoperability- ESMIG position

• We agree with the recommendations of the EG1 report

• ESMIG can assist Member States with taking the right approach for reaching interoperability

• Interoperability issues related to Smart Metering standards (incl. H interfaces) SM-CG

• Overall alignment of data (format) definitions: study by experts

DSF Interoperability

I: Existing CEN/CLC/ETSI combinations

II: New developments by CLC TC205 and ETSI (SAREF)

III: New developments by IEC TC57 and openADR

Information on II needs to be provided by I and III:

Alignment needed

Action 2.1 Contribution to the French draft digital bill

Multi-Energy Data governance & European Green Button Prospective

Executive SummaryFrench Strategic Committee for Eco-Industries (COSEI)

Energy Efficiency Working Group Networks Subgroup

Réunion transversale CNI – 12 février 2015 10

COSEI Presentation COSEI Network WG Objectives & Contributors

COSEI Network Group : COSEI is an official consultation body between French State Economy Department (DGE) and Sustainable Development and Climate (DGEC). COSEI states for “Stategic Orientation Committee of Eco Industries - Grid Group”. It is dedicated to the development of the Eco Technologies and is structures around 4 big areas of which renewable energy and Energy EfficiencyObjectives of this contribution:The purpose is to make all the stakeholders and decision makers aware of the importance of the governance of energy data, in the context of legislative initiatives on the management of data and energy transition. It offers a firmly local or national multi-energy approach based on a principle of economic efficiency, based on consensus and recommendation approach.WG Contributors: The COSEI group gathers numerous stakeholders such as industrials, network operators (heat, gas electricity and hydrogen), local authorities associations, customer associations, research centers representatives, ministries


Recommendation 1Special Status for anonymised & useful data

Recommendation title: Give energy data the status of General Interest dataRecommendation extract: Data can be considered as general interest data when making it available is justified in the interest of the general public (public policy, scientific research, new economic activities)This data should be considered as being of general interest for access conditions that would be defined according to player categories:•Anonymised energy-metering data for the residential, tertiary and industry sectors (and associated geolocation data) covered by the Articles referred to in the PLTECV (Draft Energy Transition for Green Growth Act)•Local data on the network connection capacity to integrate new producers or consumers into the network (the relevant geographical mesh will have to be specified)An additional study out of this scope could focus on peripheral data (for example data related to usage downstream of meters, energy billing data, weather forecasting data, etc.)


Recommendation 2A Common Green Button for “Trusted Third Parties”

Recommendation title: Standardise data streams and procedures for obtaining consent based on internationally recognised protocols, and strengthen the role of trusted third parties (New Green Button)

Recommendation extract: Existing US Green Button seems not appropriate for Europe (proprietary standard, limitations)Grid operators (trusted third parties in France) should be asked to define a common standard for creating a New Green Button model that could also be proposed as a European model. This format would thus support "personal" and "anonymised" exchanges of data and its geolocation for all types of energies, which would considerably simplify cross-use, both for downloadable data but also streamed data on a predefined period.It would also allow the procedures used to obtain agreement to be standardised, bearing in mind that the two tasks (standardisation of data on the one hand and end-user managing consent on the other) are different, but mutually enhancing. It is in fact the combination of the two tasks that makes the "Green Button" initiative effective. Some French grid operators are already (but independently) in the process of defining and testing a standard for the New Green Button model, based on the CIM international standard that is widely used in the energy sector.


Recommendation 3Open this Green Button Label to Private Sector

Recommendation title: Promote the extension of the “New Green Button" model downstream of the meterRecommendation extract: Model be extended to private systems and services generating data downstream of energy meters for the purposes of simplifying the emergence of energy services that would cross metering data and downstream metering data. This could be done by creating an open label allowing the model to be extended to voluntary players in the downstream sector.


Recommendation 4Support local multi energy platform initiatives

Recommendation title: Support and assist local authorities wishing to develop multi-energy data platforms on their own behalf and also allowing third parties (economic players or academic researchers) to access them. Recommendation extract: A need for centralisation on a single platform seems desirable for consumers. This would make it easier for them to find their data for all the energies they use, the consents they have granted and their history - all in an identical format. Similarly, centralising data from different energy flows, and also heritage data, will enable local authorities to optimise their energy planning, allowing, for example, arbitrage from one type of energy to another. It is therefore recommended that local authorities be given support and assistance in setting up such multi-energy data platforms for themselves or on behalf of individuals and companies in their region, should they so wish. This recommendation is close to consensus, but economic interest of such structures needs to be demonstrated and proven, as well as associated governance rules.


Prospect Vision and ambition to be clarified by Authorities

Prospective extract: The measures described above (and particularly the consensus on recommendations 1, 2 and 3) are likely to create a clear data publication architecture that can be controlled by users and individuals. For Recommendation 4, several options were identified within the working group that wanted to highlight them to assist the legislator in his choice and encourage him to take action to give visibility to the sector: •Market activity: consider that beyond the "third-party" public service delegation role for each type of energy, the management of multi-energy platforms is a free competition activity reserved for private parties or for a local public initiative, such as for a city or a town. •Local public service: consider that energy-management meta-platforms are a public service in the energy sector and come under the same level of local governance as that described in the French Energy Transition Act (Local Authorities) to ensure public confidence in their subsequent use.•National public service: consider that a single government-regulated meta-platform within the framework of a public service delegation contract should assume this role to ensure public confidence in its subsequent use.

TSO-DSO cooperation – electricity

DSOs•CEDEC•EDSO4SG•EURELECTRIC•GEODE

TSOs

•ENTSO-E

Regular high-level meetings (+/- 4 meetings per year)

of TSOs and DSOson different electricity topics

CommissionDG Ener

(2/3 meetings per year) on TSO-DSO interface/cooperation

Meetings on 26 January and on 7 July 2015

• Memorandum of understanding (MoU) between ENTSO-E and Associations representing DSOs (signed 2/4/2015) :

Main goals: –Exchange of policy and communication papers (before their publication)–Joint activities in areas of common interest (besides existing cooperation on network codes):

• Roles and responsibilities of TSOs and DSOs• Coordinated planning of network development• Active and reactive power management• Data management

• First workshops (WS) (TSO & DSO experts - DG ENER as observer)

– General TSO-DSO interface (2 days: 17 and 18 March 2015)• Roles and responsibilities• Flexibility and congestion management• Active and reactive power management & exchange

OUTCOME: • Paper was presented to DG ENER on 7 July 2015• Officially published on 9 November 2015

– TSO – DSO Data management (3 days : 20 May and 11 & 12 June 2015)• DSO-TSO data needs• Exchange of data between DSO – TSO• Data collection / storage & governance• Data delivery and market facilitation

OUTCOME: Paper started, but not finalized (need for additional information)

EnergyEnergy


SGTF-EG2DPIA Template

Valerie Lorgé and Manuel SánchezDirectorate for Internal Energy Market

Directorate General for EnergyEuropean Commission

EnergyEnergy

Commission Recommendation 2014/724/EU: DPIA Template

EnergyEnergy

Activities performed so farDate Action Objective

5.3.2015 Kick-off Meeting by DG ENER Member States, National Data Protection Authorities, National Energy Regulators, the industry and civil society representatives

17.04.2015 Alliander/EDP Workshop – NL Alliander and EDP Distribuição initiative

29.04.2015 Alliander/EDP Workshop – PT Alliander and EDP Distribuição initiative

22.5.2015 DG ENER's Experience Sharing Workshop

Share experiences of the Alliander and EDP initiative with other utilities and encourage more DSOs.

24.09.2015 EDSO workshop. Incentivize/test the DPIA template with EDSO members.

EnergyEnergy

Activities planned for 2016Date Action Objective

22.01.2016 ENER Workshop with Betatesters Confirmed: ENEL, RWE and Oesterreichsenergie, and Alliander/EdP Not confirmed: ERDF, CEZ, Iberdrola

Febr. 2016 Mid Term Assessment Analysis of the recommendations and definition of actions

May 2016 ENER workshop Additional input from industry

Oct 2016 End of the Test Phase Final input and consensus

Dec. 2016 EC feedback to WP29 Report back on the test phase

EnergyEnergy


SGTF-EG2Energy Expert Cybersecurity

Platform – Expert Group

Michaela Kollau and Manuel SánchezDirectorate for Internal Energy Market

Directorate General for EnergyEuropean Commission

EnergyEnergy

Energy Expert Cyber Security Platform (EECSP)

EECSP –Expert Group (quartly)Analysis of energy specific needs and fill the gapsDevelop short to long term strategyRegular monitoring

Stakeholder Forum (annual)Sharing information and best practices in line with implementation of

legislation and evolution of risks, threats, etc.

Advise the Commission on policy and regulatory directions on cybersecurity for the whole energy sector

at European level

EnergyEnergy

EECSP – Expert Group

EnergyEnergy

EECSP – Expert GroupInitial Roadmap 2016-2017

Date Action Objective

16.12.2015 Kick-off meeting Set up the group, procedures and start gap analysis of legislation, incl. SoS, NIS, GDPR

22.04.2016 Draft analysis and draft report Draft for 1st deliverable

22.06.2016 Final report of gap analysis 1st deliverable and start strategy27.10.2016 Draft for the energy strategy Consolidate a 1st draft for the strategy 17.02.2017 Conclusion of the strategy Consensus and deliver the strategy17.05.2017 Final Strategy Deliver the final report & recommendations02.10.2017 Monitoring Monitoring report

EnergyEnergy

EECSP – Forum Meetings (under discussion)Date Action Objective

Q1/Q2 2016 CNECT-ENER Roundtable &1st EECSP Forum

High-level roundtable on cyber security in the energy sector in combination with the 1st

Forum Meeting to monitor/steer the progress achieved within the Expert Group meetings

18.10.2016 2nd EECSP Forum Meeting • to monitor the progress achieved within the Expert Group meetings

• steer their activity towards most desirable/useful outcomes from the energy sector perspective

• to validate the sector-wide relevance and applicability of the Expert Group outputs.

18.02.2017 3rd EESCP Forum Meeting • See above

sgtf-sc meeting 4 december 2015 sgtf-eg3 regulatory ... - reporting eg3 eg1 eg2 - 04.12.2… · 4...

Documents