session 9- "how the pilot program’s research design will meet the congressional reporting...

Upload: pbriresearchlibrary

Post on 08-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Session 9- "How the Pilot Programs Research Design will meet the Congressional reporting requirements of Section 1807" by William Lyons

    1/13

    Policy Session:

    NTPP Overview TRB NTPPWorkshop

    William M. LyonsJanuary 11, [email protected]

  • 8/6/2019 Session 9- "How the Pilot Programs Research Design will meet the Congressional reporting requirements of Section 1807" by William Lyons

    2/13

    2

    Presentations: NTPP Overviews

    Planning (Session B)1. Goals of Program

    2. Challenges

    3. Collaborative Approach4. Program Evaluation

    5. Community-level vs. Project Evaluation

    Policy (Session C)

    1. Congressional reporting requirements2. NTPP focus and approach

    3. Challenges: NTPP and Nonmotorized in general

  • 8/6/2019 Session 9- "How the Pilot Programs Research Design will meet the Congressional reporting requirements of Section 1807" by William Lyons

    3/13

    3

    Nonmotorized Pilot Program

    Established under Section 1807, SAFETEA-LU

    to demonstrate the extentbicycling andwalking can carry a significant portion of the

    transportation load and represent a majorportion of the transportation solution.

  • 8/6/2019 Session 9- "How the Pilot Programs Research Design will meet the Congressional reporting requirements of Section 1807" by William Lyons

    4/13

    Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program

    5/13/2011 4

    Section 1807 Calls for Data on Changes Motor vehicle usage

    Nonmotorized transportationusage

    Public transportation usage Congestion

    Energy usage

    Frequency: bicycling & walking

    Connectivity to community

    activity centers Health, and

    Environment

  • 8/6/2019 Session 9- "How the Pilot Programs Research Design will meet the Congressional reporting requirements of Section 1807" by William Lyons

    5/13

    Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program

    5/13/2011 5

    PHASE 1: BASELINE ASSESSMENT (UMN)

    NTPP

    Results

    to Report

    in Final

    Report

    PHASE 2: PROJECT EVALUATIONS (PILOTS, Volpe

    Center, & CDC)

    PHASE 3: BOOKEND ASSESSMENT (UMN)

    PHASE 4: SYNTHESIS & ANALYSIS OF PHASES 1/3 (UMN)

    COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS

    PHASE 5: COMMUNITY COUNTS/SURVEYS (Pilots,

    ALTA, Volpe)

    OTHER (TBD)

    Components of Evaluation

  • 8/6/2019 Session 9- "How the Pilot Programs Research Design will meet the Congressional reporting requirements of Section 1807" by William Lyons

    6/13

    Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program

    5/13/2011 6

    Community Level Indicators: the Ideal

    Data Element Use / Description

    Mode split Percent and trips per day/year

    Walking and biking trip length Average and derived totals

    Walking and biking trip time Average and derived totals forphysical activity

    Walking and biking trip purpose Utilitarian and non-utilitarian

    Avoided VMT To derive energy and CO2 savings

    Nonmotorized transfers to transit Numbers and linked trip length(NM within multimodal system)

  • 8/6/2019 Session 9- "How the Pilot Programs Research Design will meet the Congressional reporting requirements of Section 1807" by William Lyons

    7/13

    7

    A VMT is not a VMT is not a VMTFrom: Transport for London, D. Hawkett

  • 8/6/2019 Session 9- "How the Pilot Programs Research Design will meet the Congressional reporting requirements of Section 1807" by William Lyons

    8/13

    8

    A VMT is not a VMT is not a VMT

    (emissions factors) (from Transport for London,D.

    Hawkett)

    C

    2 (

    km )

    ! "

    # $

    %

    &

    '

    ( )

    0

    # $

    %

    &

    1

    0 2

    )

    0

    # $

    %

    &

    3

    4

    0 4

    5

    ! ! $

    7

    % 1

    0 2

    )

    0

    Dri 8 e c 9 c @ e & conditions

    C 2 Comparison of ord ocus o er different dri e c c es & conditions

    A 3

    0

    %

    A 3

    0

    6 6%

    4 3

    0

    6 6%

    A 3

    0

    %

    4 3

    0

    6 %

  • 8/6/2019 Session 9- "How the Pilot Programs Research Design will meet the Congressional reporting requirements of Section 1807" by William Lyons

    9/13

    Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program

    5/13/2011 9

    British Framework: Another approach Gold standard evaluation framework

    Comparing multimodal alternatives

    Monitoring/assessing results

    Cost-Benefit Analysis (broad benefits)

    Monetize benefits Segregated track = $0.09/minute

    On-road non-segregated lane = $0.04/minute

    Secure parking = $1.35/user

    Pedestrian signage = $0.10/kilometer

  • 8/6/2019 Session 9- "How the Pilot Programs Research Design will meet the Congressional reporting requirements of Section 1807" by William Lyons

    10/13

    Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program

    5/13/2011 10

    UK Guidance on Appraisal

    Indicators in economic appraisal of walking cycling

    Indicator Used to Appraise

    Cycling and walking users Ambience (perception, stress)

    New individuals cycling or walking Health (physical fitness)

    Car kilometers saved Accidents

    CO2 emissionsFuel tax revenue

    Travel time (decongestion)

    Commuter trips generated Health (absenteeism)

  • 8/6/2019 Session 9- "How the Pilot Programs Research Design will meet the Congressional reporting requirements of Section 1807" by William Lyons

    11/13

    11

    Policy challenges: NTPP and NM in general

    From positive .to howpositive?1. Quantify to compete

    Essential to quantify results,

    but:1. Limits of avoided VMT

    2. And what about cap/op costs?

    Program structure and

    available methods limit policyconclusions

  • 8/6/2019 Session 9- "How the Pilot Programs Research Design will meet the Congressional reporting requirements of Section 1807" by William Lyons

    12/13

    12

    OtherInsights: Project foc s

    Health: CDC studies

    Equity: access forunderserved communities(Minneapolis)

    Reduced VMT from:

    1. Travel marketing2. Bike sharing

    3. Bike Boulevards

    4. NM links to transit

    NTPP will measure resultsagainst policy goalsbut

    may be least useful offindings

  • 8/6/2019 Session 9- "How the Pilot Programs Research Design will meet the Congressional reporting requirements of Section 1807" by William Lyons

    13/13

    13

    OtherInsights

    Design of future pilot programs

    Priorities for improving evaluation methods

    Planning and policy profiles

    1. Mainstreaming NM in planning process Importance of evaluating NM:

    o As part of multimodal system (linked trips)

    o As part of larger built environment

    o Over a long time horizon