session 7 (iii)

Upload: anjnakandari

Post on 03-Jun-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    1/25

    1

    International StrategicAlliances

    1

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    2/25

    2

    Session Objectives

    Compare joint ventures and other forms ofstrategic alliances.

    Characterize the benefits of strategicalliances.

    Describe the scope of strategic alliances.

    Discuss the forms of management used forstrategic alliances.

    Identify the limitations of strategic alliances.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    3/25

    3

    International Corporate

    Cooperation

    Cooperation between international firms cantake many forms, such as cross-licensing ofproprietary technology, sharing of productionfacilities, cofunding of research projects, andmarketing of each others products usingexisting distribution networks. Such forms ofcooperation are known collectively as

    strategic alliances, business arrangementswhereby two or more firms choose tocooperate for their mutual benefit.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    4/25

    4

    Joint Venture

    Ajoint ventureis a special type

    of strategic alliance in whichtwo or more firms join together

    to create a new business entity

    that is legally separate anddistinct from its parents.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    5/25

    5

    The NTPC Example

    NTPC -ALSTOM POWER SERVICES PVT.LTD. (NASL)Incorporated in 1999 and formerly known

    as NTPC-ABB ALSTOM POWERSERVICES PVT. LTD)

    OBJECTIVE:Undertake Renovation &Modernization of power stations in India and

    other SAARC countries. PROMOTERS' EQUITY:NTPC: 50%ALSTHOM Power Generation AG : 50%

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    6/25

    6

    Joint Ventures Abroad From

    India Under Fast Track and Normal

    Schemes.

    Approvals only from RBI under fast

    track scheme.

    FIPB, Ministry of Finance,MEA,DCA &

    other relevant bodies including the RBI

    for Normal Schemes.

    Visit iic.nic.in

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    7/25

    7

    Benefits of Strategic Alliances

    Firms that enter into strategic alliances

    usually expect to benefit in one or more ways.

    International business may realize fourbenefits from strategic alliances:

    Ease of market entry

    Shared risk

    Shared knowledge and expertise

    Synergy and competitive advantage

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    8/25

    8

    The Korean Life Insurance Sector

    Prior to 1980 only six companies. The number increased to 33 in 97 and

    then went down to 21 by 2001.

    Seven Jt. Ventures started operations in1989 (50-50 and 49-51).

    None of these exist as a partner post

    1997.Either one has exited or has beenacquired.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    9/25

    9

    Current Company/Acquired Company

    South Korea /Doowon; Samshin; Hyundai (= Hankuk and Josun)

    Allianz First/ Coryo

    Samsung/ Kukje

    Hungkuk /Taeyang Kyobo/ BYC

    Daishin

    Shinhan

    Dongbu

    Tongyang Pacific

    Metropolitan Youngpoong (now acquired by Prudential (UK))

    New York

    Lucky

    Kumho/ Dong-ah

    SK /Kookmin; Handuk

    Hanil Prudential (US)

    ING

    France (to become Allianz-Hana)

    LINA (Cigna)

    AIG

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    10/25

    10

    Shared Risk

    Strategic alliances can be used to either

    reduce or control individual firms risks.

    Even though Boeing has enjoyed muchsuccess as a manufacturer of commercial

    aircraft, it wanted to reduce its financial

    exposure of the 777 project. Thus, it

    collaborated with three Japanese partnersFuji, Mitsubishi, and Kawasakiagreeing to

    let them build 20 percent of the 777 airframe.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    11/25

    11

    Shared Knowledge and

    Expertise

    Reasons for strategic alliance:

    To gain knowledge and expertise that itlacks.

    To learn more about how to producesomething,

    To acquire certain resources,

    To deal with local governments regulations,

    To learn to manage in a differentenvironmentinformation that a partner oftencan offer.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    12/25

    12

    Scope of Strategic Alliances

    Comprehensive Alliances

    Comprehensive alliances arise when the

    participating firms agree to perform togethermultiple stages of the process by which goods or

    services are brought to the market: R&D, design,

    production, marketing, and distribution.

    By fully integrating their efforts, participating firms

    in a comprehensive alliance are able to achieve

    greater synergy through sheer size and total

    resources.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    13/25

    13

    Scope of Strategic Alliances

    (cont.)

    Functional Alliances

    Strategic alliances may also be narrow inscope, involving only a single functional

    area of the business. In such cases,integrating the needs of the parent firms isless complex.

    Types of functional alliances include:

    Production alliances

    Marketing alliances

    Financial alliances

    R&D alliances

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    14/25

    14

    Production Alliances

    A production allianceis a functional

    alliance in which two or more firms each

    manufacture products or provideservices in a shared or common facility.

    A production alliance may utilize a

    facility one partner already owns.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    15/25

    15

    Marketing Alliances

    A marketing allianceis a functional alliance in

    which two or more firms share marketing

    services or expertise. In most cases, onepartner introduces its products or services

    into a market in which the other partner

    already has a presence. The established firm

    helps the newcomer by promoting,advertising, and/or distributing its products or

    services.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    16/25

    16

    Financial Alliances

    A financial allianceis a functionalalliance of firms that want to reduce thefinancial risks associated with a project.Partners may share equally incontributing financial resources to theproject, or one partner may contribute

    the bulk of the financing while the otherpartner (or partners) provides specialexpertise or makes other kinds ofcontributions to partially offset its lack of

    financial investment.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    17/25

    17

    Research and Development

    Alliances

    In an R&D alliance, the partners agreeto undertake joint research to develop

    new products or services. Such alliances are usually not formed

    as joint ventures, since scientificknowledge can be transmitted amongpartners through private researchconferences, the exchange of scientificpapers, and laboratory visits.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    18/25

    18

    Implementation of Strategic

    Alliances

    A firm contemplating a strategic alliance

    should consider at least four factors in

    selecting a partner (or partners): Compatibility

    The nature of the potential partners

    products or services The relative safeness of the alliance

    The learning potential of the alliance

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    19/25

    19

    Form of Ownership

    A joint venture almost always takes the formof a corporation, usually incorporated in thecountry in which it will be doing business.

    The corporate form enables the partners toarrange a beneficial tax structure, implementnovel ownership arrangements, and betterprotect their other assets.

    In isolated cases, incorporating a jointventure may not be possible or desirable.The partners in these cases usually chooseto operate under a limited partnership

    arrangement.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    20/25

    20

    Public-Private Venture

    A special form of joint venture, a public-privateventure, is one that involves a partnership between aprivately owned firm and a government. Such an

    arrangement may be created under any of severalcircumstances: When the government of a country controls a resource it

    wants developed, it may enlist the assistance of a firm thathas expertise related to that resource.

    A firm may pursue a public-private venture if a particularcountry does not allow wholly owned foreign operations.

    A firm entering a centrally planned economy may have nochoice but to enlist governmental support, because thesegovernments often limit the freedom of both domestic andforeign firms.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    21/25

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    22/25

    22

    Shared Management

    Agreement

    Under a shared management agreement,

    each partner fully and actively participates in

    managing the alliance. The partners run thealliance, and their managers regularly pass

    on instructions and details to the alliances

    managers. The alliance managers have

    limited authority of their own and must defermost decisions to managers from the parent

    firms.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    23/25

    23

    Assigned Arrangement

    Under an assigned arrangement, one

    partner assumes primary responsibility

    for the operations of the strategicalliance.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    24/25

    24

    Delegated Arrangement

    Under a delegated arrangement, whichis reserved for joint ventures, the

    partners agree not to get involved inongoing operations and so delegatemanagement control to the executivesof the joint venture itself. These

    executives may be specifically hired torun the new operation or may betransferred from the participating firms.

  • 8/12/2019 Session 7 (III)

    25/25

    25

    Pitfalls of Strategic Alliances

    Regardless of the care and deliberation a firmputs into constructing a strategic alliance, itstill must consider limitations and pitfalls.There are five fundamental sources ofproblems that often threaten the viability ofstrategic alliances: Incompatibility of partners

    Access to information

    Conflicts over distributing earnings

    Loss of autonomy

    Changing circumstances