seattle round2 p1 amaos

Goal Areas:(A)(4)(a): Performance on Summative Assessments –Reading, Grades 3-10 MSP(A)(4)(a): Performance on Summative Assessments –Math, Grades 3-9 MSP, Grade 10 EOC

Performance Measures: (E)(3)(Grades PreK-3)(a) – 3rd Grade Reading(E)(3)(Grades 4-8)(a) – 8th Grade Algebra

(E)(3)(Grades 4-8)(b) – Math MSP(E)(3)(Grades 4-8)(d) – Science MSP

Following are easy links to the different RTT Goal Area or Performance Measure Targets worksheets found in this file. Please

put your cursor or pointer towards the beginning of each Goal Area or Performance Measure Letter (Number):

Following are easy links to the different RTT Goal Area or Performance Measure Targets worksheets found in this file. Please

put your cursor or pointer towards the beginning of each Goal Area or Performance Measure Letter (Number):

District: SEATTLE

District 79% 74.0% 78.6%

White 91% 88.7% 90.7%

Pacific Islander 55% 61.1% 60.0%

Hispanic 65% 58.6% 65.4%

Black 53% 47.0% 57.5%

Asian 81% 73.2% 78.9%

American Indian 44% 52.9% 50.0%

Low Income 61% 53.3% 63.2%

Special Education 50.9% 52.5%

Limited English 45% 31.4% 41.2%

District 79% 76.6% 72.0%

White 90% 90.0% 87.3%


Hispanic 66% 62.7% 53.1%

Black 56% 52.8% 42.5%

Asian 80% 76.6% 74.7%


Low Income 61% 59.8% 50.9%



District 77% 73.3% 70.9%

White 90% 87.4% 86.0%


Hispanic 64% 56.7% 53.0%

Black 50% 43.9% 45.3%

Asian 78% 77.4% 73.3%


Low Income 60% 54.0% 51.0%



Methodology for determining status: Percent of students scoring proficient or higher on the statewide assessment of Measures of Student Progress

Methodology for determining growth: ESEA Flexibility AMOs (2011 baseline, 1/12 improvement to 100% per year to 2017)

7th Grade

Reading MSP

6th Grade

Reading MSP

Goal AreaGoal Area Subgroup

10th Grade

Reading MSP

2012-13

Actual

2011-12

ActualBaseline

2010-11

3rd Grade

Reading MSP

4th Grade

Reading MSP

5th Grade

Reading MSP

8th Grade

Reading MSP

Source: OSPI Report Card 2010-2012 SY

District 80% 74.0% 78.6%

White 91% 88.7% 90.7%


Hispanic 68% 58.6% 65.4%

Black 57% 47.0% 57.5%

Asian 84% 73.2% 78.9%


Low Income 64% 53.3% 63.2%



District 74% 76.6% 72.0%

White 86% 90.0% 87.3%


Hispanic 62% 62.7% 53.1%

Black 48% 52.8% 42.5%

Asian 78% 76.6% 74.7%


Low Income 57% 59.8% 50.9%



District 73% 73.3% 70.9%

White 85% 87.4% 86.0%


Hispanic 62% 56.7% 53.0%

Black 49% 43.9% 45.3%

Asian 78% 77.4% 73.3%


Low Income 60% 54.0% 51.0%



District 85% 78.4% 80.3%

White 95% 91.7% 93.4%


Hispanic 78% 71.6% 69.1%

Black 70% 57.0% 63.9%

Asian 85% 80.5% 81.0%


Low Income 75% 65.0% 68.3%





Baseline

2010-11

2011-12

ActualSubgroup

2012-13

Actual

District: Seattle

District 74% 70.6% 67.1%

White 86% 85.3% 83.8%


Hispanic 59% 51.4% 49.7%

Black 45% 39.6% 35.5%

Asian 79% 79.3% 71.7%


Low Income 54% 48.8% 44.3%



District 70% 66.8% 64.6%

White 82% 83.3% 81.4%


Hispanic 53% 45.7% 43.8%

Black 41% 36.3% 31.8%

Asian 80% 73.9% 69.6%


Low Income 51% 45.2% 40.7%



District 70% 68.7% 65.2%

White 84% 84.0% 80.0%


Hispanic 50% 47.3% 47.1%

Black 37% 37.0% 33.8%

Asian 78% 76.7% 74.7%


Low Income 50% 47.8% 44.8%



Methodology for determining proficiency (numerator): Percent of students scoring proficient or higher on the statewide EOC 1 or EOC 2 Math Proficiecy test in 10th grade or lower. If student takes both EOCs the higher score is counted.

Methodology for continuous enrollment (CE, denominator): Students enrolled in the same school from October 1 through the end of the testing window with no more than a 30 day consecutive calendar break in enrollment at that school. Doesn't include F1 Visa students, and students who attend public schools part-time.

District 80.2% 74.9% 66.1%

White 90.8% 86.6% 82.2%

Pacific Islander 45.5% 35.3% 43.7%

Hispanic 65.4% 64.5% 45.2%

Black 57.8% 45.3% 37.5%

Asian 89.5% 85.1% 72.9%

10th Grade Math

EOC



5th Grade Math MSP

3rd Grade Math MSP

4th Grade Math MSP

Goal Area Subgroup

2011-12

Actual

Goal Area Subgroup

2012-13

Actual

2012-13

Actual

2011-12

ActualBaseline

2010-11

Baseline

2010-11

American Indian 69.2% 52.9% 53.6%

Two or More Races 74.8% 78.4% 65.6%

Low Income 68.7% 58.4% 48.2%

Special Education 34.0% 31.2% 18.4%

Limited English 50.0% 40.9% 33.3%

Source: OSPI Report Card 2010-2012 SY

10th Grade Math

EOC

District 70% 70.2% 65.8%

White 84% 82.1% 79.9%


Hispanic 52% 53.6% 50.0%

Black 39% 40.1% 33.9%

Asian 81% 84.4% 78.5%


Low Income 51% 53.1% 48.5%



District 72% 67.4% 65.6%

White 84% 79.9% 80.7%


Hispanic 55% 52.2% 50.0%

Black 39% 39.5% 34.8%

Asian 84% 79.7% 75.4%


Low Income 54% 50.4% 45.8%



District 69% 64.1% 61.6%

White 80% 76.4% 78.1%


Hispanic 57% 49.5% 43.8%

Black 43% 37.1% 34.3%

Asian 84% 74.8% 70.2%


Low Income 55% 46.5% 44.8%







Goal Area

2011-12

ActualBaseline

2010-11

2012-13

Actual

6th Grade

Math MSP

7th Grade

Math MSP

8th Grade

Math MSP

Subgroup

District: SEATTLE

All participating

students79%

White 91%

Pacific Islander 60%

Hispanic 65%

Black 58%

Asian 79%

American Indian 50%

Low Income 63%

Special Education 53%

Limited English 41%

3rd grade students enrolled

from Oct 1 through test date

who participates in the

specified assessment.

(E)(3) Performance Measures

(E)(3) Performance Measures – Required for Applicants with Participating Students in Grades PreK-3

(E)(3)(Grades PreK-3)(a) % of Students Scoring Proficient or Higher on State Assessment for 3rd

Grade Reading

Academic leading indicator: WA Statewide

Measures of Student Progress (MSP) assessment

of 3rd grade reading.

Methodology for determining status: Percent of

students scoring proficient or higher on the

statewide assessment Measures of Student

Progress

Methodology for determining targets: ESEA

Flexibility AMOs (2011 baseline, 1/12

improvement to 100% per year to 2017)

SOURCE: OSPI Report Card 2010-2011 SY and

Performance Measure Applicable Population SubgroupBaseline

2010-

74% 79%

89% 91%

61% 55%

59% 65%

47% 53%

73% 81%

53% 44%

53% 61%

51%

31% 45%

2011-12

(actual)

2012-13

(actual)

(E)(3) Performance Measures

(E)(3) Performance Measures – Required for Applicants with Participating Students in Grades PreK-3

(E)(3)(Grades PreK-3)(a) % of Students Scoring Proficient or Higher on State Assessment for 3rd

Grade Reading

District: SEATTLE

A B C

Subgroup

# Pa

rticipa

ting

Stud

ents w

ho

are o

n tra

ck

to co

llege- &

career-rea

din

ess (ap

pro

x.)

Tota

l # of P

articip

atin

g Stu

den

ts

% w

ho

are o

n tra

ck to co

llege- &

career-

read

iness (A

/B)*

10

0

% w

ho

are on

track to co

llege- & career-

readin

ess (A/B

)*10

0

% w

ho

are on

track to co

llege- & career-

readin

ess (A/B

)*10

0

All participating

students1,987 5,311 36% 43% 50%

White 1,299 2,952 44% 73% 74%

Pacific Islander 11 80 14% 13% s

Hispanic 107 566 19% 23% 22%

Black 102 620 17% 27% 36%

Asian 438 1,022 43% 52% 66%

American Indian 30 71 42% 20% s

Low Income NA NA NA

Special Education NA NA NA

Limited English NA NA NA 13% 11%

*Baseline Data is for Road Map region only, i.e., North Seattle data not included. Baseline by-district data is not available.

Methodology for determining targets: Compounding growth to 2020 Target of 72.8% enrollment (twice the rate of 8th grade algebra taking in 2010 high school graduates--36%). (Target based on AMO method, half way from baseline to 100% by 2017.

Compounding growth is calculated: Pt = Pt-1* [(pf/pi)^1/(T-1)] ; where T is the total number of years, including baseline and final year.South

Seattle

2011-12

(Actual)

South

Seattle

2012-13

(Actual)

(E)(3) Performance Measures – Required for Applicants with Participating Students in Grades 4-8

(E)(3)(Grades 4-8)(a) % of 8th Students Enrolled in a Math Class Designated as Algebra 1 or Higher.

(Algebra Geometry, Algebra 2, Pre-calculus, Statistics or any Higher Level or College Level Class)

Baseline High School Class of

2010 (REGIONAL)*

Methodology for determining status: Percent of all 8th grade students enrolled in at least one math class designated as Algebra 1 or higher. (Algebra Geometry, Algebra 2, Pre-calculus, Statistics or any higher level or college level class)

*Baseline Data is for Road Map region only, i.e., North Seattle data not included. Baseline by-district data is not available.


Compounding growth is calculated: Pt = Pt-1* [(pf/pi)^1/(T-1)] ; where T is the total number of years, including baseline and final year.






Compounding growth is calculated: Pt = Pt-1* [(pf/pi)^1/(T-1)] ; where T is the total number of years, including baseline and final year.





Washington State Math Assessment (4th - 8th grades)

E3(G4-8)b_MSP Math

Methodology for determining status: Percent of students scoring proficient or higher on the statewide assessment Measures of Student Progress


SEATTLE

2011-12 Baseline

Goal area Subgroup actual 2010-11

District 70% 66.8% 64.6%

White 82% 83.3% 81.4%


Hispanic 53% 45.7% 43.8%

Black 41% 36.3% 31.8%

Asian 80% 73.9% 69.6%


Low Income 51% 45.2% 40.7%



District 70% 68.7% 65.2%

White 84% 84.0% 80.0%


Hispanic 50% 47.3% 47.1%

Black 37% 37.0% 33.8%

Asian 78% 76.7% 74.7%


Low Income 50% 47.8% 44.8%



District 70% 70.2% 65.8%

White 84% 82.1% 79.9%


Hispanic 52% 53.6% 50.0%

Black 39% 40.1% 33.9%

Asian 81% 84.4% 78.5%


Low Income 51% 53.1% 48.5%



District 72% 67.4% 65.6%

White 84% 79.9% 80.7%


Hispanic 55% 52.2% 50.0%

Black 39% 39.5% 34.8%

Asian 84% 79.7% 75.4%


Low Income 54% 50.4% 45.8%

2012-13

actual

4th Grade

Math MSP

5th Grade

Math MSP

6th Grade

Math MSP

7th Grade

Math MSP



District 69% 64.1% 61.6%

White 80% 76.4% 78.1%


Hispanic 57% 49.5% 43.8%

Black 43% 37.1% 34.3%

Asian 84% 74.8% 70.2%


Low Income 55% 46.5% 44.8%



SOURCE: OSPI Report Card 2010-2011 SY

8th Grade

Math MSP

7th Grade

Math MSP

Methodology for determining status: Percent of students scoring proficient or higher on the statewide assessment Measures of Student Progress

District: Seattle

2010-11

(Baseline)

2012-13

(Actual)

Overall 64.0% 75.0%

White 82.0% 91.0%

Pacific Islander 16.0% 71.0%

Hispanic 45.0% 59.0%

Black 30.0% 43.0%

Asian 67.0% 75.0%

American Indian 45.0% 45.0%

Low Income 39.0% 54.0%

Special Education 39.0%

Limited English 19.0% 28.0%

Overall 70.0% 75.0%

White 86.0% 88.0%

Pacific Islander 48.0% 33.0%

Hispanic 51.0% 59.0%

Black 44.0% 47.0%

Asian 76.0% 85.0%

American Indian 67.0% 60.0%

Low Income 53.0% 60.0%

Special Education 39.0%

Limited English 25.0% 35.0%

5th Grade

8th Grade

Methodology for determining

status: Percent of students scoring

proficient or higher on the

statewide assessment Measures of

Student Progress for Science.

Methodology for determining

targets: Road Map Method: 2020

target is based on the performance

of the Top Ten districts in

Washington at baseline.

Compounding growth model was

used to calculate interim targets.

SOURCE: OSPI Report Card

2010-2011 SY and 2012 - 2013 SY


(E)(3)(Grades 4-8)(d): Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Higher on State Assessment for 5th and 8th Grade Science

Performance MeasureApplicable

PopulationSubgroup


(E)(3)(Grades 4-8)(d): Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Higher on State Assessment for 5th and 8th Grade Science

seattle round2 p1 amaos

Documents