screening of immuno pharmacological agents

84
Screening methods of immunopharmacological agents T.Manoj

Upload: manoj-kumar-tekuri

Post on 26-Jun-2015

162 views

Category:

Education


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Detailed review on screening methods for immuno pharmacological agents

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Screening methods of

immunopharmacological agents

T.Manoj

Kumar

Page 2: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Immunity

• Refers to the ability of the body to identify and resist

microorganisms that are potentially harmful.

• “State of protection from infectious disease”.

• This ability enables the body to fight or prevent infectious disease

and inhibit tissue and organ damage.

Page 3: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• The immune system is not confined to any one part of the body.

• Immune stem cells, formed in the bone marrow, may remain in the

bone marrow until maturation or migrate to different body sites for

maturation.

•After maturation, most immune cells circulate into the body and

exert specific effects.

Page 4: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Types of immune system:-

Innate immune system:

part of the immune system with which we are born; that is, it does not

change or adapt to specific pathogens.

• provides a rapid first line of defence, to keep early infection in

check, giving the adaptive immune system time to build up a more

specific response.

Page 5: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• Innate immunity consists primarily of a chemical response system

called complement, and the endocytic and phagocytic systems, which

involve roaming “scavenger” cells, such as macrophages, that detect

and engulf extracellular molecules and materials, clearing the system

of both debris and pathogens.

Page 6: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Adaptive immune system

• adapts or “learns” to recognize specific kinds of pathogens, and

retains a “memory” of them for speeding up future responses.

• The learning occurs during a primary response to a kind of pathogen

not encountered before by the immune system.

Page 7: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Cells involved in immunity

• Lymphocytes : B , T cells .

•Antigen Presenting Cells: Macrophages, Dendritic cells and B cells.

• Other cells: Neutrophils, Eosinophils etc, Natural Killer (NK) cells.

• Antigens:- Some chemical that creates immune response. Most are

proteins or large polysaccharides from a foreign organism.

Page 8: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

•Microbes : Capsules, cell walls, toxins, viral capsids, flagella, etc.

Non-microbes : Pollen, egg white , red blood cell surface molecules,

serum proteins, and surface molecules from transplanted tissue.

Antigens Epitope : Small part of an antigen that interacts with an

antibody, consist of 10-12 amino acids sequence.

• Any given antigen may have several epitopes. Each epitope is

recognized by a different antibody.

Page 9: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• Epitopes: Antigen regions that Interact with Antibodies.

Page 10: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

B cells:- Mature in bone marrow (self-reactive cells get eliminated)

Perform 3 main functions:

• Plasma cells: make antibody/Ig (bound or free)

• Effector cells: help recognize and eliminate antigens

•Memory cells: maintains an arsenal of memory cells, with increased

affinity for antigen.

B CELL WITH ANTIGEN EMBEDED ON IT

Page 11: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents
Page 12: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Antibodies :

• . Proteins that recognize and bind to a particular antigen with very

high specificity. Made in response to exposure to the antigen.

•One virus or microbe may have several antigenic determinant sites ,

to which different antibodies may bind.

• Each antibody has at least two identical sites that bind antigen:

(Antigen binding sites).

• Belong to a group of serum proteins called immunoglobulins (Igs).

• A flexible Y-shaped molecule with four protein chains.

Page 13: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• 2 identical light chains, 2 identical heavy chains .

•Variable Regions : Two sections at the end of Y’s arms. Contain the

antigen binding sites (Fab) . Identical on the same antibody, but vary

from one antibody to another.

•Constant Regions : Stem of monomer and lower parts of Y arms.

• Fc region : Stem of monomer only. Important because they can bind

to complement or cells.

Page 14: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents
Page 15: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

HOW THE ANTIBODIES ARE PRODUCED

• B cells develop from stem cells in the bone marrow of adults

(liver of fetuses). After maturation B cells migrate to lymphoid

organs (lymph node or spleen).

• Clonal Selection : When a B cell encounters an antigen it

recognizes, it is stimulated and divides into many clones called

plasma cells , which actively secrete antibodies. Each B cell

produces antibodies that will recognize only one antigenic

determinant.

Page 16: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

TYPES OF DEFENCES:-

• Cell-mediated defences (cellular immunity).

• Antibody-mediated defences (humoral immunity).

•Cell-mediated immunity (CMI): It is the result of the activity of

many leukocyte actions, reactions, interactions that range from

simple to complex. This type of immunity is dependent on the

actions of the T (Thymus) lymphocytes, which are responsible for a

delayed type of immune response.

Page 17: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Do not involve Antibody, direct contact with T cells, T cells help

destroy intracellular pathogens ex. virus-infected cells by triggering

apoptosis or recruiting macrophages.

• The T lymphocyte becomes sensitized by its first contact with a

specific antigen.

Page 18: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

•Humoral immunity: In humoral immunity special lymphocytes

(white blood cells), called B (Bone cell) lymphocytes, produce

circulating antibodies to act against a foreign substance. This type of

immunity is based on the antigen–antibody response.

• Act by secreted Antibodies gives protection against extracellular

pathogens (bacteria) encountered in bodily liquids such as blood

pathogens eliminated via neutralization, complement activation or

opsonization.

Page 19: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents
Page 20: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

HOW BODY IS PROTECTED FROM ANTIGEN

• Cytotoxic T (Tc) Cells: Destroy target cells. Recognize antigens on

the surface of all cells:

• Kill host cells that are infected with viruses or bacteria.

• Recognize and kill cancer cells.

Page 21: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• Recognize and destroy transplanted tissue. Release protein called

perforin which forms a pore in target cell, causing lysis of infected

cells. Undergo apoptosis when stimulating antigen is gone.

Page 22: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGICAL AGENTS

• Immunomodulators: It may be defined as a substance, biological or

synthetic, which can stimulate, suppress or modulate any of the

immune system including both innate and adaptive arms of the

immune response.

• TYPES OF IMMUNOMODULATORS:-

Immunoadjuvants: These agents are used for enhancing efficacy of

vaccines and, therefore, could be considered specific immune

stimulants.

Page 23: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• Immunostimulants: According to definition these agents are

inherently non- specific in nature as they enhances body’s resistance

against infection.

• Immunosuppressants: These are a structurally and functionally

heterogeneous group of drugs, which are often concomitantly

administered in combination regimens to treat organ transplant

rejection and autoimmune diseases.

Page 24: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

SCREENING METHODS OF

IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGICAL AGENTS

Page 25: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

In vitro methods:

1. Inhibition of histamine release from mast cells.

2. Mitogen induced lymphocyte proliferation.

3. Inhibition of T cell proliferation.

4. Chemiluminescence in macrophages.

5. PFC (plaque forming colony) test in vitro.

Page 26: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

In vivo methods:

1. Spontaneous autoimmune diseases in animals.

2. Acute systemic anaphylaxis in rats.

3. Anti-anaphylactic activity (Schultz-Dale reaction).

4. Passive cutaneous anaphylaxis.

5. Arthus type immediate hypersensitivity.

6. Delayed type hypersensitivity.

7. Reversed passive arthus reaction.

8. Adjuvant arthritis in rats.

9. Collagen type II induced arthritis in rats.

Page 27: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Inhibition of histamine release from mast cells:

PURPOSE AND RATIONALE:

•Hypersensitivity reactions can be elicited by various

factors:

-immunologically induced

-non-immunologically induced

- or the mediation through immune responses.

Page 28: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• The non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, indomethacin,

flufenamate and meclofenamate, inhibited the release of

histamine from rat peritoneal mast cells induced by

pharmacological or immunological challenge in vitro.

•Anti-inflammatory steroids had little effect on histamine

release from the mast cells.

• Th inhibition of histamine release by the aspirin-like drugs

was not prevented by incubation with glucose, unlike the

inhibition of 2,4,dinitrophenol or antimycin-A.

Page 29: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• This suggests that the non-steroid anti-inflammatory compounds

do not act by preventing the energy production from oxidative

metabolism, required for histamine release.

• The inhibition of the calcium ionophore A23187-induced

histamine release by the aspirin-like drugs was reversed by an

increase in the calcium concentration of the incubation medium.

• The results suggest that the non-steroid anti-inflammatory

compounds inhibit histamine release by actions on calcium

influx into the mast cell, or on calcium mobilization or

utilization within the mast cell.

Page 30: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

•Mediators responsible for hypersensitivity reactions are released

from mast cells.

•An important preformed mediator of allergic reactions found in these

cells is histamine.

Page 31: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

PROCEDURE:

Preparation of mast cell suspension:

Wistar rats are decapitated and exsanguinated.

50 ml of Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) are injected into

the peritoneal cavity.

The fluid containing peritoneal cells is collected in a centrifuge

tube and centrifuged at 2000 rpm.

The cells are resuspended in HBSS. Then the cell suspension is

brought to a final concentration of 105 mast cells/100 μl.

Page 32: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• Test compound administration and induction of histamine

release:

1 ml test drug +mast cell suspension incubated at 37 °C for 15 min.

The cells are made up to a volume of 3 ml with HBSS an equal

volume of calcium-ionophore or specific allergen is added.

The suspension incubated at 37 °C for 30 min followed by

centrifugation at 2500 rpm.

Page 33: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• Extraction of histamine:

1 ml of the top layer is transferred to a tube containing 300 mg

NaCl and 1.25 ml butanol.

The sample is alkalized to extract the histamine into butanol by

adding 1 ml 3 N NaOH.

the sample is centrifuged for 5 min, One ml of the top layer

(butanol) is pipetted into a 5 ml tube containing 2 ml of n-heptane

and 0.4 ml of 0.12 N HCl.

0.5 ml of the aqueous phase is transferred to another tube.

Page 34: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• Induction of o-phthaladehyde complexing reaction:

• Sample + 100 μl 1 N NaOH + 100 μl 0.2% phthalaldehyde solution

After 2 min, add 50 μl 3 N HCl.

•Determination of histamine release:

The total sample is transferred to an auto sampler vial and the

histamine concentration is determined by a fluorescence detector.

Page 35: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

EVALUATION:

Percent histamine release=

sample hist. rel.- spontaneous hist. rel x 100

100% hist. rel.- spontaneous hist. rel.

statistical evaluation is carried out using the Student’s t-test.

Page 36: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Mitogen induced lymphocyte proliferation:

• Cultured lymphocytes can be stimulated to DNA synthesis by

various mitogens.

• Measurement of DNA synthesis can be accomplished by tritiated

thymidine which is incorporated into the newly synthesized DNA.

Immunmodulating properties can be detected either by pre-

treatment of the animals in vivo or by adding the test drug to the

cultured lymphocytes.

Page 37: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• PROCEDURE:

• Ex vivo: Miceor rats are used.

•Animals receive the test compound once a day for 5 days.

• They are sacrificed, spleens are removed and a single cell

suspension of 5 × 106 cells/ml is prepared.

•Mitogens are titrated and 0.1 ml of the cell suspension is added.

• Plates are incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in air for 48–60 h and for

another 8 h after addition of 3H-thymidine per well.

Page 38: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• Cells are harvested on glass fiber filters and after drying the degree

of radioactivity.

IN VITRO

•Animals are sacrificed and their spleens removed.

•A single cell suspension of 107 cells/ ml is prepared and 0.05 ml

placed in each microtiter well.

• Then the test compound is added in 0.05 ml.

Page 39: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

At last 0.1 ml of the double concentrated mitogen is added. Plates

are incubated for 48–60 h and for another 8 h after addition of 3H-

thymidine per well.

Cells are harvested on glass fiber filters and after drying the degree

of radioactivity is determined.

Page 40: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

EVALUATION:

• Stimulation index = proliferation ratio according to positive

control, either with or without mean spleen weight.

• Statistical evaluation is carried out using the Student’s t-test.

Page 41: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Chemiluminescence in macrophages:

• PURPOSE AND RATIONALE:- The stimulation of macrophages by

antigen, complement, phorbol-esters, ect. leads to elaboration of

O2 and other oxygen metabolites. Superoxide ion (O2-) and other

highly reactive oxygen metabolites (radicals) form the basis for an

efficient microbicidal system in vivo.

Page 42: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

•When these radicals are released in response to self antigens, tissue

damage is often the result.

• Inhibition of this process can be regarded as a measure for

immunmodulating effects of compounds.

• The oxygen metabolites can produce light-emitting reactions

(chemiluminescence).

•which is measurable if amplified with suitable agents, such as the

cyclic hydrazide luminol.

Page 43: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Chemiluminescence in macrophages:

• Ag

macrophages elaboration of O2– and

other oxygen metabolites

tissue damage basis for an efficient

microbicidal system in vivo

• oxygen metabolites chemiluminescence– measured

by cyclic hydrazide luminol. • Inhibition of this process can be regarded as a

measure for immunmodulating effects of compounds.

Page 44: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

PROCEDURE:-

•NMRI mice weighing 30 g or Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 250–

300 g of either sex are used.

A. Positive control

1. Sensitized mice, receiving vehicle

2. Mice, developing an autoimmune disease, receiving vehicle

3. Rats, developing adjuvant arthritis, receiving vehicle

Page 45: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

B. Negative control

1. Mice not sensitized, receiving vehicle

2. Mice, not developing an autoimmune disease, receiving vehicle

3. Rats without adjuvant arthritis.

Page 46: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• Ex in-vivo experiment:-Groups of 6 animals are treated for 6 days orally or subcutaneously

with test compound or the standard (prednisolone acetate or leflunomide).

Decapitated and exsanguinated.

Macrophages are obtained by flushing the peritoneal cavity with 10 ml saline, containing 250 IU heparin.

The cells are pooled, washed several times and suspended.

Page 47: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

For measurement in the luminometer the following mixture is

prepared:

200 μl macrophages (2 × 106)

100 μl luminol solution (100 μg/ml)

100 μl phorbolmyristenacetate solution.

Each sample is mixed thoroughly without the

phorbolmyristenacetate solution, put into the luminometer and

counted at 2 min intervals for 10 s. The addition of the phorbolester

induces the reaction.

Page 48: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• 100 μl of macrophage suspension+ 100 μl of the solution of the test compound incubated for 15 min at 37 °C.

• 100 μl of the 3.5 μM phorbolester solution

• 100 μl of luminol solution

• luminescence measured in the luminometer

Page 49: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

EVALUATION:

The time of maximal counts for the positive control is

recorded.

For all groups the ratio of counts per 10 s is determined at that time,

compared to the positive control counts per 10 s and the percent

change is calculated.

For statistical evaluation the experimental group is compared with

the positive control group using Student’s t-test.

Page 50: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

PFC (plaque forming colony) test in vitro:

PURPOSE AND RATIONALE:

Identification of antibody producing cells is based on the ability of

the secreted IgM antibody to fix complement and thereby lyse the

indicator erythrocytes.

Spleen cells or peripheral blood lymphocytes, previously incubated

with antigen, are mixed with (SRBC).

Page 51: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

After addition of compliment and incubation, plaques (clear areas)

caused by the lysis of SRBC appear in the otherwise cloudy layer.

Antibody forming cells can be detected by the appearance of

plaques..

The number of plaques obtained is proportional to the number of

antibody producing lymphocytes in the cell population.

Page 52: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

PROCEDURE:

NMRI mice or Lewis rats are used.

A. Positive control

Spleen cells incubated with antigen and medium.

B. Negative control:

Spleen cells incubated with medium alone.

The animals are decapitated and the spleens are removed from the

peritoneal cavity.

Page 53: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

For the induction of PFC, a 0.5 ml splenocyte suspension is added

to 0.5 ml of a suspension of SRBC.

Thereafter, 1 ml of the solution of the test compound is added and

the limbrowells are incubated at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator for 5

days.

Per group 3 limbrowells are set up. On day 5, the 3 wells of each

group are pooled, washed in medium and the number of cells is

determined.

Page 54: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

For each cell pellet, 875 μl of washed SRBC and 125 μl absorbed

guinea pig compliment are added.

The suspension is mixed thoroughly and filled in chambers

constructed of micro slides.

The chambers are placed in the incubator at 37 °C for 90–120 min.

The plaque forming colonies are counted immediately after

incubation.

Page 55: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

EVALUATION:-

The activity of test compounds can be determined using the following formula:-

1. PFC/3 wells:= plaques ×100

μl

2. % change in the number of plaques:

plaques x100

plaques pos. Control

d%= x-100

3. % change in number of cells= number of cells x 100

number of cells pos. Control

d%= x- 100

Page 56: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• In vivo methods:

1. Acute systemic anaphylaxis in rats:

• PURPOSE AND RATIONALE:

• Rats are immunized with ovalbumin and Bordetella pertussis

suspension as adjuvant.

•After 11 days the animals are challenged by intravenous injection of

ovalbumin.

• The shock symptoms can by inhibited by corticosteroids and

intravenous disodium cromoglycate.

Page 57: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• PROCEDURE:

• Female Sprague-Dawley rats (120 g) are immunized by i.m. injection of 10

mg/kg highly purified ovalbumin.

• 1 ml of Bordetella pertussis suspension is injected intraperitoneally.

• IgE antibodies are induced and attached to the surface of mast cells and

basophilic granulocytes.

• 11 days later by intravenous injection of 25 mg/kg highly purified

ovalbumin to animals.This results in formation of antigen-antibody-

complexes.

Page 58: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

•On the surface of mast cells and basophilic granulocytes in blood

and in all organs with immediate release of various mediators of

anaphylaxis, such as histamine, serotonin, SRS-A, prostaglandins; in

shock symptoms and 80% lethality.

Page 59: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

EVALUATION:

• The shock symptoms are scored and mortality counted.

• Results after treatment are compared with untreated controls.

• Pre-treatment with corticosteroids or disodium cromoglycate can

inhibit death and ameliorate shock symptoms.

• Statistical calculation is performed using the χ2-test.

Page 60: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Anti-anaphylactic activity(Schultz-Dale reaction):

• PURPOSE AND RATIONALE:

•Guinea pigs are sensitized against egg albumin.

• Challenge after 3 weeks causes in isolated organs

release of mediators, e.g. histamine, which induce contraction in

isolated ileum.

Page 61: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

:PROCEDURE:-

•Guinea pigs of either sex ( 300–350 g) are sensitized with alum

precipitated egg albumin.

•Alum egg albumin is prepared by dissolving egg albumin (1 mg/ml)

in six percent aluminium hydroxide gel, suspended in saline.

• The mixture is stirred and kept at room temperature.

• Each animal receives at the same time injections of 0.125 ml of this

mixture in each foot pad and 0.5 ml sc.

:?

Page 62: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

•After 4 weeks the animals are killed and the ileum is dissected out.

• Cleaned pieces, about 2–3 cm long, are mounted in an organ bath

containing Tyrode solution at 37 °C.

• The strips are allowed to equilibrate for 15 min.

• The contractility of the ileum strips is tested by adding 10–4 g/ml

BaCl2 solution.

• To one organ bath the standard and to other vials the test compounds

are added.

Page 63: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

•One organ bath serves as control.

•After 3 min ovalbumin in a final concentration of 2 × 10–6 g/ml is

added.

• The contractions are recorded with strain gauges by a polygraph.

Page 64: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

EVALUATION:

The results are expressed as presence or absence of blocking activity

(percentage inhibition).

If anti-anaphylactic activity is observed, ED50 values using

different doses are calculated.

Page 65: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

DELAYED TYPE HYPERSENSITIVITY

PURPOSE AND RATIONALE:

•Delayed type hypersensitivity is a reaction of cell mediated

immunity and becomes visible only after 16–24 h.

Page 66: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• PROCEDURE:

• Rats are sensitized in the same way by i.m. Administration of 0.5 ml

ovalbumin suspension 7 days prior to the start of the experiment.

• They are challenged by injection of 0.1 ml of 0.04% solution of

highly purified ovalbumin in the left hind paw.

• Footpad thickness is measured immediately and 24 h after ovalbumin

administration.

Page 67: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Passive cutaneous anaphylaxis

• PURPOSE AND RATIONALE:-

• Passive cutaneous anaphylaxis is a immune reaction of the

immediate type. By passive immunization of rats in the skin with rat

anti-ovalbumin serum and achallenge 2 days later with ovalbumin at

the same skin area antigen antibody complexes are formed in the

mast cells inducing release of mediators.

• This results in vasodilatation, increase in permeability of the vessel

walls and leakage of plasma.

Page 68: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• To make the allergic reaction visible, Evan’s blue dye is

administered along with the antigen. Evan’s blue dye is

attached to the albumin fraction of plasma, producing a blue

spot .

• This blue spot indicates that an anaphylactic reaction has taken

place in the skin.

Page 69: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• PROCEDURE:-

• For preparation of antiserum male rats (200–250 g) are

adrenalectomized are allowed to recover for 3 days.

• Thereafter, animals are sensitized with egg albumin (1 mg/animal)

using aluminium hydroxide gel (200 mg) as adjuvant.

• Alum egg albuminis prepared by dissolving 1 mg/ml of egg

albumin in20% aluminium hydroxide gel, suspended in saline .

Page 70: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• Each animal simultaneously receives 0.125 ml of the above

solution in each foot pad and 0.5 ml subcutaneously.

•After 8 days, the animals are bled and antiserum is collected.

• For the test, the antiserum is diluted in such a manner as to give

a wheal of 15–20 mm diameter in a preliminary titration.

• Aliquots of 100 μl of appropriate dilution of antiserum are

injected intradermally into the shaved dorsal skin of normal

male rats weighing about 100 g.

Page 71: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

•After 8 days, the animals are bled and antiserum is collected. For

the test, the antiserum is diluted in such a manner as to give a

wheal of 15–20 mm diameter in a preliminary titration.

• Aliquots of 100 μl of appropriate dilution of antiserum are

injected intradermally into the shaved dorsal skin of normal male

rats weighing about 100 g.

•After 24 h of latent period each animal is challenged with the

intravenous administration of0.1 ml of 2.5% Evans blue dye

containing 25 mg/ml of egg albumin.

Page 72: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• In the case of intravenous administration, the test compound is

administered simultaneously with the antigen and the dye.

• In case of oral testing, the compound is given orally 1 h prior to

challenge.

• The animals are sacrificed 30 min after the challenge.

• The amount of Evans blue dye leaked at the site of

• passive cutaneous anaphylactic reaction is extracted and determined

colorimetrically at 620 mμ wavelength.

Page 73: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• In the case of intravenous administration, the test compound is

administered simultaneously with the antigen and the dye.

• In case of oral testing, the compound is given orally 1 h prior to

challenge. The animals are sacrificed 30 min after the challenge.

• The amount of Evans blue dye leaked at the site of passive

cutaneous anaphylactic reaction is extracted and determined

colorimetrically at 620 mμ wavelength .

Page 74: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

EVALUATION

• The amount of Evans blue extracted from passive cutaneous

anaphylactic reaction is taken as 100 percent.

• Percent inhibition of passive cutaneous anaphylactic calculated.

• The standard disodium cromoglycate at adose of 3 mg/kg i.v. or 30

mg/kg orally results in 80–100% inhibition.

• Using different doses, ED50 values can be calculated.

Page 75: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Spontaneous autoimmune diseases in animals

• Several spontaneous autoimmune diseases have been reported in

several inbred animal strains:

1.New Zealand black mouse (NZB mouse):- The NZB mouse

develops

• A spontaneous autoimmune disease with autoimmune hemolytic

anemia, splenomegaly, glomerulonephritis,lymphoproliferative

disorders and peptic ulcerations.

Page 76: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• 2.New Zealand black/white F1 (B/W) mouse : These animals

develop nephritis similar to that in human systemic lupus

erythematosus and show mononuclear cell infiltration in salivary

and lachrymal glands such as in human Sjögren’s syndrome.

Page 77: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• 3. Immunodeficient alymphoplasia mice were recommended:-

as a spontaneous model for Sjøgren’s syndrome.

• 4. Palmerston North autoimmune mouse strain:- which exhibits

both spontaneous systemic autoimmunedisease and otic capsule bone

formation has been proposed as a model for otic capsule osteogenesis

and otosclerosis.

• 5. Non obese diabetic mouse (NOD mouse) -NOD mouse is

considered a good model for type I diabetes mellitus.

Page 78: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

6.Arthus type immediate hypersensitivity• PURPOSE AND RATIONALE:-

• The immune complex induced Arthus reaction comprises

inflammatory factors that have been implicated in the acute

responses in joints of rheumatic patients.

• Complement and polymorphonuclear neutrophiles are activated via

precipitating antigen-antibody complexes leading to an inflammatory

focus characterized by edema,hemorrhage and vasculitis. Arthus

reaction of the immediatetype becomes maximal 2–8 h after

challenge.

Page 79: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

PROCEDURE:-

Ovalbumin suspension

• 1 700 mg ovalbumin are suspended in 100 ml paraffin oil. 4.38 ml

pertussis vaccine are suspended in 70 ml0.9% NaCl-solution. Both

suspensions are mixed to form an emulsion.

• Wistar or Sprague-Dawley rats of either sex weighing(220–280 g can

be used. Seven days prior to start of the experiment rats are

sensitized by i.m. administrationof 0.5 ml of the ovalbumin

suspension.

Page 80: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

• They are housed in groups of eight with standard food and water.

Twenty-four hours and one hour prior to induction of the Arthus

reaction, test compounds are administered to groups of 8 animals.

• The rats are challenged by injection of 0.1 ml of 0.04% solution of

highly purified ovalbumin in the left hind paw. Swelling of the paw

occurs which reaches a maximum after a few hours .

The footpad thickness can be measured by calipers.

Page 81: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

•One group of sensitized animals treated with solvent alone serves

as positive control.

• one group of nonsensitized animals treated with solvent alone

serves as negative control.

• Standard doses are 30 mg/kg cortisone or 10 mg/kg prednisolone

p.o.

Page 82: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

EVALUATION

• The change in footpad thickness is expressed as the percent

change from the vehicle control group.

• Comparison of experimental group to positive control is

evaluated statistically using Student’s t-test.

Page 83: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

Reference:

•Hans gerhard vogel. Drug discovery and evaluation: pharmacological

assays, vol 2, 3rd edition, pg no- 792-799.

• http// www.authorstream.com.

•KD Tripathi, Essentials of Medical pharmacology, Jaypee

publications, Sixth edition, pg no- 173-184.

•Harsh Mohan, Text book of pathophysiology, 6th edition, J.P bros.,

New Delhi, 2010, Pg no- 115-120.

Page 84: Screening of immuno pharmacological agents

THANK YOU