science & engineering complex benchmarking & programming · 2013. 9. 13. · workshop 4 -...

Science & Engineering ComplexBenchmarking & Programming

Executive SummaryJune 2010

T H E G E O R G E W A S H I N G T O N U N I V E R S I T Y : S C I E N C E A N D E N G I N E E R I N G C O M P L E X | E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y

J u n e 2 0 1 0

Table of Contents

Project Overview: Goals & Vision ...................................................................... 2

Program Definition & Development .................................................................... 4

• ExistingConditions/SiteCapacity ...............................................................4

• TheEngagementProcess:ResultsofCollaboration ....................................6

• ProgramDevelopment:Sizing/Principles/DetailedProgramOverview .....8

Concept Development: Blocking & Stacking .................................................. 12

• VerticalOrganization/SiteSections ........................................................... 12

• UpperLevelPlanning:TheResearch/TeachingNeighborhood ................ 14

• ThePublicDomain:VisibilityandInteraction ............................................. 16

• LowerLevelPlanning:Parking/Service/CentralUtilitiesPlant ................. 18

Systems&Sustainability:TechnologyInfrastructure ........................................ 20

• MechanicalSystemsBaseline&FourOptions ............................................ 20

• SustainabilityGuidingPrinciples ................................................................. 22

BenchmarkingStudyofPeerSchools ............................................................. 24

• SpaceandRevenueMetrics:8PeerSchools ........................................... 24

• AcademicProgramBenchmarking ............................................................. 26

SalutetotheParticipants ................................................................................ 28

MessagefromExecutiveVicePresidentforAcademicAffairsDonaldR.Lehman

GWhaslongrecognizeditsneedforastate-of-the-artscienceandengineeringcomplex.Withourenhanced

focusonresearch,aswellaswiththestrideswehavemadetobecomealeaderinthehighereducationcom-

munity,buildingthisstructureismoreimportanttodaythaneverbefore.

Scientificdiscoverydrivesprogressinalmosteveryaspectoflifeinthe21stcentury,fromfightingdiseaseto

conservingenergy.Engineeringisequallycriticaltoprogressinourtechnology-driveneconomy.

ConsiderablethoughthasgoneintotheScienceandEngineeringComplexBenchmarkingandProgramming

reportthatfollows.Wesurveyeddeans,departmentchairs,andfacultymemberstoidentifyprioritiesthatwill

shapethenewbuilding.Wesoughttousethespacetomaximumadvantageandtobuildinopportunitiesfor

growth.WerealizedthatthebuildinghasahighlystrategiclocationandwilllinkRossHall,homeoftheMedical

Center;theAcademicCenter,amajorcampusacademicfacility;andthenewcommercialbuildingatSquare54.

WiththeadditionoftheScienceandEngineeringComplex,thiskeyareaofcampuswillbecomemuchstronger

andmoreunified.

WhatwilltheScienceandEngineeringComplexlooklike?Whichprogramswillmovethere?HowwilltheCom-

plexaffecttheentireGWcommunity?

Philosophically,ourgoal is tobring togetherselected, research-activedepartments in thesciencesanden-

gineering,creatingopportunities forstudents, researchers,andprofessors toworkcollaborativelyaswellas

individually.

Plansareforabuildingeightstoriesaboveground,withtwolevelsforprogramsbelowground.Therewillbe

spaceforresearchandteachinglabsandanumberoffacultyofficesaswellasforthedean’ssuitefortheSchool

ofEngineeringandAppliedScience.AndtherewillbeemptyareasthatwillbeusedasneededasGWevolves

inwayswecannotyetanticipate.

TheComplexwillhaveapositiveeffect throughout theGWcampus. Itwill infuseourcommunitywithnew

energyandenthusiasmforscience,engineering,andresearch.Anditwillfreeupmuch-neededroominother

partsofcampus for facultyofficesandclassroomsdedicated todisciplinessuchas thehumanitiesand the

social sciences.

Inshort,theComplexwillliftGWtothenextlevelofacademicexcellencethroughcollaborativediscoveryand

applications.Wecannotmoveforwardwithoutit.

Sincerely,

DonaldR.Lehman,ExecutiveVicePresidentforAcademicAffairs

T H E G E O R G E W A S H I N G T O N U N I V E R S I T Y : S C I E N C E A N D E N G I N E E R I N G C O M P L E X | E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y2

J u n e 2 0 1 0

StrategyDrivesVision

TheGeorgeWashingtonUniversityselectedBallingertoconductanintenselycollaborativeprocesstoformthebasisofadisciplinaryandinterdisciplinaryscienceandengineeringcomplex.ThisplanningreportdescribesthekeyideasthatwillleadtotherealizationofadisciplinaryandinterdisciplinaryteachingandresearchbuildingintheheartoftheFoggyBottomcampus.Insubstance,thereportdescribesthebasicsoftheprogram,thebuildingorganization,andtheplanforrealizingthistransformationalproject.

Theneedforthisprojecthaslongbeenestablished.ForTheGeorgeWashingtonUniversitytocontinueitstrajectoryasapremierUniversity,theleadershipandfacultyrecognizedthevalueofinvestmentinasharedsci-enceandengineeringfacility.TheReportoftheScienceandEngineeringBuildingAcademicProgramCommit-teeof2007laidthegroundworkforthisprogram,outliningaplantobringselecteddepartmentsofscienceandengineeringdisciplinestogethertofosterapremierteachingandresearchenvironmentthatwilltransformthesedisciplineswhileraisingthereputationoftheUniversityatlarge.

INTENSE COLLABORATION: PROCESS WITH STAKEHOLDERS

Reflectingboththeimportanceoftheprojectandtheneedforspecializedexpertise,theleadershipselectedBostonPropertiesandBallingerArchitectstoworkwithstakeholdersthroughouttheUniversitycommunitytoengageinacollaborativeprocessaimedatdefiningaprogramandclarifyingGW'svisionfortransformingthefutureofscience/engineeringteachingandresearch.

TheprogrammingprocessbeganwithaseriesofindividualinterviewswithFaculty,DepartmentChairs,Deans,andUniversityLeadership.Thisledtoasetofexploratoryconversationsaboutthenatureofacollaborativeprogramconductedduringaseriesofinteractiveworkshops:

Workshop 1• -Thefuturepotentialofcollaborativeresearch.

Workshop 2/3• -Thenatureoftheresearch/teachingneighborhood.

Workshop 4 • -Thepublicdomainoftheprogramteaching:symposia,outreachandsharedcommons.

Theseinteractivesessionsservedasaspringboardfortestingidealinterrelationshipsandrefiningthebuildingprogram.Anoutgrowthofthesedialoguesarethebasicprinciplesthatwillguidetheproject'sdevelopmentinthemonthsahead.

Interspersedwiththesecollaborations,regularoperatingandleadershipcommitteesessionswereheldfocusedonrefiningtheprogramandplanningconcepts.Fourprimaryquestionswereanalyzedthatledtotheprogramandplanningconceptspresentedinthisreport:

Whatistherightbalanceofteachingandresearchforthelongterm(a50yearview)?1.

WhataretheappropriatespacebenchmarksforteachingandresearchforthefutureofGW?2.

Whatprovisionsshouldbemadeforfuturegrowthbeyondinitialoccupancy?3.

Howcanwecreateashowcaseforteachingandresearchthatwilldrawstudents,facultyandthelarger4. communitytothesiteandtheUniversity?

Inadditiontoformulatingtheprogramandplanningconceptsforthebuilding,threesub-committeeswereformedwhoseworkisreflectedinthisreport.ThefirstgroupledbyCanKorman,PhD.,ProfessorandAs-sociateDeanforResearchandGraduateStudiesandRandyM.Packer,PhD.,ProfessorandAssociateDeanforSpecialProjects,developedandconductedbenchmarkingactivitiesrelatedtospace,costandresearchproductivity.ThesecondgroupwastheSystemsSubcommitteewhichfocusedondefiningthevariousbuild-ingsystemsfortheSEC.Thethirdteamfocusedonsustainabilityinthecontextofacampus-wideinitiativeledbyMeghanChapple-Brown,DirectoroftheOfficeofSustainability.Theirfindingslaythegroundworkforthisprojectasamodelforurbansustainability.

PROjECTOVERVIEW:VISION/PROCESS/RESULTS

GOALS

CAMPUS WIDE IMPACTCatalyticEffect

COLLABORATIVE / INTERDISCIPLINARYScienceandEngineeringSynergies

ENGAGED LEARNING PARADIGM

New Direction

MEASURABLE OUTCOMES Metrics Of Success

50 / 100 YEAR BUILDINGSpace&Systems

Project Goals & Design Criteria

T H E G E O R G E W A S H I N G T O N U N I V E R S I T Y : S C I E N C E A N D E N G I N E E R I N G C O M P L E X | E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y 3

J u n e 2 0 1 0

Project Goals Drive Vision

ATRANSFORMATIVERESULT

AtthestartofthisprocesstheteambrainstormedtheProjectGoalsandDesignCriteria.ThesegoalsandcriteriareflectboththeimpactoftheprojectontheUniversityatlargeandthespecialcharacterofthisbuilding,whichwillemergeduringthedesignprocess.

Astheprogrammingprocessunfoldedarangeofideasweretestedthatledtoasetofspecificprogramanddesignprinciplesdescribedbelow.

TEACHING AND RESEARCH INTEGRATEDI.

WithanincreasedresearchprofileatGW,theintegrationofteachingandresearchinscienceandengi-neeringwillbeanimportantpedagogicalconnectiontomaintainandenhance.Thisledtotheideaoftheresearch/teachingneighborhoodasabasicbuildingblockofboththeprogramanddesignconcept.

INCLUSION OF THE FULL SPECTRUM OF STUDENTSII.

Allstudentswhotakecoursesinscienceandengineeringshouldexperiencethebuilding.Asaresult,class-labsweredevelopedandlocatedtoengagetheentireUniversitycommunitywithsciencesandengi-neering.Toaccomplishthis,scienceandengineeringmajorlabsclusterwiththeresearchandnon-majorteachinglabsarefeaturedinthepubliczoneofthebuilding.Theintentistomaketheselabsvisiblefrombothinsideandoutsidethefacility.

CLUSTERING OF FACULTY TO CREATE COMMUNITY AND INTERACTIONIII. Consolidatingspaceforscienceandengineeringfacultythatarecurrentlylocatedinmultipleareasacrossthecampuswillenhancethesenseofacommonteachingandresearchcommunity.Bysharingsupportfunctionssuchasacopycenter,mailroom,conveniencestationsandconferencerooms,bothoperationalandcommunitybenefitscanbeachieved.

THE PUBLIC DOMAIN: WELCOMING VISITORS AND THE LARGER COMMUNITYIV.

Thescienceandengineeringcomplexwillhavespacestosupportoutreach,symposiaandpublicevents.Thecharacterofthegroundfloorsistobepermeablewithmultipleentrancesanddaylightsothatpeopleareinspiredtoengagethebuildingasavibrantpathwayandanimportantcampusdestination.Scienceandengineeringdisplaysandretailconveniencesareintendedtocreateawelcomingcharactertothispiv-otalbuilding.Furthermore,thebuildingshouldbevisuallyappealing,reflectiveoftheprogramandindica-tiveoftheimportanceofscienceandengineeringatGW.

TheUniversity'soverarchinggoaloftheprojectistobeholisticallytransformative:fromhowteachingandresearchareconducted,tohowtheprojectengageswiththecampuscontext,resultinginanenhancementtothequalityandprestigeoftheUniversityasawhole.

DESIGN CRITERIA

• SiteLocation:HUB• UrbanSustainability• EnhanceOverallReputationofGW

• Interaction• NoBarriers• OpenCharacter/“OnDisplay”

• IntegrateResearchw/Teaching• LearningCommons• PublicOutreach

• EnhanceGWReputation• ResearchRevenue• BuildingPerformance• Cost/Delivery

• FlexibletoAdapt• CatalystforContinuedGrowth ofScience/Engineering/Research


J u n e 2 0 1 0

Square54

CurrentLocationsofCCAS/SEASDepartments

THE SITE

TheCCASandSEASdepartmentsanticipatedforinclusionintheSECcompriseapproximately155,000netsquarefeetandarecurrentlylocatedin12differentbuildingsovermultiplefloors.Theconsolidationofspaceforthesedepartmentsinthecoreofthecampusisasignificantopportunitytostrengthendepartmentalfoundationandtoinspirecollaborativeinterdisci-plinaryteachingandresearchactivity.

LocatedimmediatelyNorthoftheSECsite,Square54iscurrentlyunderdevelopmentasamixed-usetowncenterfeaturingoffice,residentialandfirstfloorretail.Thisprojectwilldramaticallychangethelandscapeof IStreetandgenerateanactivestreetenvironmentnorthoftheSEC.

Overview

ExistingSite

Site

Square54


J u n e 2 0 1 0

SiteCapacityStudies:LotDefinitionSiteAnalysis

Site Area: 56,415SF

MaximumLotCoverage:90%

90%of56,514SF=50,774 SF

0 20010050Locations for Future Retail (2007 Foggy Bottom Campus Plan)

Bus Stop Existing Entry

50,774 SF @ 90% Coverage

31'-0"

18'-

4"

20'-3"

56.6

’56

.2'

57.7' 58.0'

61.2'60.0'

18'6" Min Penthouse Setback

Kennedy Onassis Residence Hall

Fulbright Residence Hall

Munson Residence Hall

40' Min. Setback

ThesitefortheSECisinauniquelocationwithfrontagesonfourstreets-22nd,23rd,H,andI.23rdStreetisamajorregionalarteryandisanoppor-tunityfortheSECtoconnecttotheresearchactivityinRossHall.HStreetrepresentstheUniversityCorridorconnectingtoKoganPlaza,theheartoftheCampusandthe"CampusCore."Theprimaryfaçadeofthebuildingfaces22ndStreetandtheAcademicCentertotheEast.WithSquare54currentlyunderconstruction,IStreetwillbereinforcedasaretailcorridorandisanopportunityfortheSECtoembracethesignificantpedestrianac-tivitygeneratedbytheMetroStationtothewest.Withanticipatedentranc-esateachofthesestreetfrontages,theSECwillserveasanengagingpathwayandvibrantdestinationthatwillpositionitasthecampusscientific/engineering“hub.”

ParkingaccessissituatedatthesouthwestcornerofthesiteonHStreet.Thecurrentparkinggaragetobedemolishedhasapproximately1200spacesandthenewfacilitywillaccommodate300-400cars.Thisreducedparkingcountisexpectedtolessentrafficcongestioninthisarea.Recog-nizingtheconfluenceoftheSECandDuquesParkingaccess,additionaltrafficstudyisrequiredtooptimizetrafficflowinthiscampussector.Aser-vicecourtaccessedfromIStreetcurrentlyservesbothMunsonandjBKOHallsandisanticipatedtoprovideservicefortheSEC.Thiscombinedservicecourtwillincreaseoperationalefficienciesandservetominimizeservice access points.

Overview

23rd Street 22nd Street

I Street

H Street

3"/FT of Height = 27'-6" Min

2"/FT of Height = 18'-4" Min

Current SEAS / CCAS Program Location


J u n e 2 0 1 0

RESEARCHAFFINITyExERCISEDeans|ChairsForum

DEFININGTHETEACHING/ RESEARCH NEIGHBORHOOD: Deans|ChairsForum

WORKSHOPWORKSHOPFOCUS:KEyISSUES/DISCUSSION

1. November 3/4/5 Initial Department Chair, Deans & Leadership Interviews•

Confirmation of Project Vision•

SettingProcesses&Formats•

2. November 17/18 SecondRoundofProgramInterviews•

VisitstoOn-CampusFacilities•

Collaborative Session with Chairs: Department Focused •(November 20: 10:00-12:00)

3. Nov 30 / Dec. 4

(Tradeline: Dec. 2/3)

Discuss Potential Site Visits•

InitialBenchmarkingFeedback•

Faculty Forum (December 4: 10:00-12:00)•

4. December 15/16 Initial Program Draft•

ImpactofSystems&SustainabilityonProgram•

Collaborative Session with Chairs: Research / •Teaching Neighborhoods (December 18: 10:00-12:00)

5. January 5/6 ReviewBenchmarkingStudy:Metrics•

DiscussAdditionalSiteVisits•

Critique/ModifyProgram•

CritiqueBlocking/StackingOptions•

Faculty Forum (January 8: 10:00-12:00)•

6. January 19/20 Collaborative Session with Chairs: Options Discussion •(January 29: 10:00-12:00)

Evaluate Block & Stack Alternatives•

7. February / March FacultySenate(February12/15)•

SECBoardCommittee(March5:10:00-12:00)•

Deans | Chairs Forum / Faculty Forum (March 11/12)•

Deans|ChairsForum:DetailedProgramOverview(March26)•

WorkshopProcess

THE ENGAGEMENT PROCESS

Clusters-Theoretical,Experimental,Departmental

EmbeddedTeaching/Theoretical&ExperimentalMix IsolatedSecureExperimental

RadialStrategy:Non–SecureCoretoSecurePerimeterResearchTeachingNeighborhoods

CoreCentric/MicrotoMacro/ComputationalIntensity

InformationCommons/InterdisciplinaryClusters

Science&EngineeringClusters/SeparateTeaching


J u n e 2 0 1 0

GROUNDFLOORAFFINITyExERCISEDeans|ChairsForum

Thefourmonthprocessfordefiningtheprogramandconductingbenchmarkingen-gagedawiderangeofconstituencieswithanumberofmulti-dayworkshops.CentraltothiscollaborativeprocesswereaseriesofexercisesperformedbyboththeDeans/ChairsandinFacultyForums.Theseblockexercisesstartedwithanassessmentofcurrentandfutureresearchaffinitiesandthentransitionedtofocusonidealrela-tionshipsofateaching/researchneighborhood.Recognizingthatchoicesareaninherentpartoftheprogrammingprocess,thefacultywasthenaskedtoprioritizethemostimportantspacesthatbestdefinetheteaching/researchneighborhood.Finally,theDeansandChairswereaskedtodefinethepublicdomainandtoconsidertheprogrammaticchoicesforthegroundfloorinanexercisecontextualizedtothesite.

TheseexerciseswereofgreatsignificanceforbothinspiringcollaborationbetweenSEASandCCASdepartmentsanddefiningtheprogramandspatialrelationshipsoutlinedinthisdocument.

PRIORITIzINGTHETEACHING/RESEARCH NEIGHBORHOODFacultyForum

Department&ResearchAffinityGroupsCollaborativeSpaceasLink:Research&Teaching

Hub(ResourceCenter)&Spokes(IntermittentResearch/Teaching)

TeachingLabFilter/CentralOpening/QuietStudy/SegregatedSupport/Entrances@Corners&MidBlock

TeachingCore@CornerofH&22nd/Coffee@CentralOpening/MunsonStudyCourt/Entrances@MidBlock

ScienceDisplay@22nd&IStreet/DemonstrationResearchSpace/CentralOpening/NoEntrance@IStreet

TutoringCenter/Re-ConfigurableTeachingLabs/CentralOpening/TeachingLabFilter/Entrances@Corners&Mid-block

Separate&AdjacentTeaching/Research/Commons:SharedSpaces as Links

Overview of Collaborations


J u n e 2 0 1 0

73%

13%

9%5%

73%

13%

9%5%

ProgramSummary 290,000NSFProgram Distribution

RESEARCHANDUPPERLEVELTEACHINGLABSPACE(94PI’S) 211,430ResearchLabs/LabSupport 78,870

PIOffices/PostDocs&RAWorkstations(94/188/376) 33,840

CoreFacilities&HighBay 25,040

TeamRooms/InteractionSpaces/Support 27,450

AdminAssistants/HotelOffices(36) 4,320

UpperLevelTeachingLabs/LabSupport(18) 32,670

SeminarRooms(14) 9,240

NON-MAjORTEACHINGLABS&LECTURE/COMMON 37,850Non-MajorStudioTeachingLabs/LabSupport(10) 24,750

LectureHall 4,000

ResourceCenter/Break-Out/Commons 9,100

DEPARTMENTS&SEASDEAN 26,9208Departments/FacultyOffices(62) 16,920

SEASDeanSuite&AssociatedSpace 10,000

BUILDINGSUPPORT/RETAIL 13,800

TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 290,000

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT

KeyProgram&BuildingPrinciplesTheBuildingShouldbeConstructedtoMaximizetheSitePotential•

TheBuildingWillIncludeResearch/Teaching/DepartmentalOfficeSpace•

TheBuildingProgramIncludesFacultyOfficesforDepartmentswithAffiliatedResearchasFollows:•

4CCASprograms:Biology,Chemistry,Physics,HominidPaleobiology•

4SEASprograms:Civil/Environmental;ComputerScience;Electrical/Computer;Mechanical/Aero-•spaceandSEASDean’sOffice

TheProgramWillAccommodate10-yearGrowthProjectionsforFacultyinCCAS/SEASprograms(+20by•2014;+41by2019)

GrowthinFacultywillbeFacultyw/eitherFundedorFundableResearch•

SpaceRequirementsAssumeIntegrationofIncreasedNumberofDoctoral/Post-DoctoralandGraduate•StudentsintoResearchProjects

FacultyinMedicalCenter&OtherUniversityCollaboratorsCanParticipateintheBuildingThroughCenters/•Institutes/ThematicResearch

TeachingWillIncludeBothNon-Major&UpperLevelTeachingLabs•

ResearchandUpper-LevelTeachingSpacewillbeFlexibletoTransitionBetweenTheseTwoUsesOver•Time

ResearchSpaceWillBeSharedandAllocatedBasedonPrimarilyExternalFunding•

ResearchIncubationSpaceWillBeAvailabletoFacultyintheBuilding•

DepartmentalSharedSupportWillBeImplementedtoAssistinSpaceEfficiency•

TheBuildingShouldbeVisuallyStrikingandAppealing,EvocativeoftheProgram,andReinforcethePromi-•nenceofScienceandEngineeringatGW.

Research&UpperLevel 211,430TeachingLabs

Non-MajorsTeachingLabs/ 37,850 Lecture/Commons

Departments/SEASDean 26,920

BuildingSupport/Retail 13,800

OverviewoftheProgramTheprogramissizedat290,000netsquarefeetaboveandbelowgradeandisorganizedintothefourcategoriesreferencedabove.Toachievethegoaloftransformingtheresearchandteachingparadigm,theprogramdevelopmentfocusedonthefollowing:

FacultyGrowth:Thespaceprogramreflectsatotalnetadditionof40+newfacultyacrossscienceandengineering1. inthenext10years.

GrowthofFundedResearch:GWexpectstogrowitsresearchinconjunctionwiththefacultygrowth.Thepro-2. gramisbasedonanaveragespaceperPI(principleinvestigator)of1,185sfincludinglab,officeandsupport.Theunderlyingprincipleforresearchistomaximizethelongtermflexibilityofthisspaceandtoassignspacebasedonresearchproductivity.

GrowthofTeaching(MajorsandNon-Majors):Givenstudentgrowthandthetrendtowardanewteachingparadigm,3. teachinginthebuildingisfocusedontheclasslab,aspacethatwillallowflexibilityinuseandprovidehigherutiliza-tion.Sharedteachingsupportspacewillvarybydiscipline,providingforpreparationequipmentandstoragetoallowforthemosteffectiveuseoftheteachinglab.

DepartmentalClusteringandSharedCenters:Aguidingprincipleoftheprogramhasbeentheconsolidationof4. spaceforscienceandengineeringdisciplines.Clusteringofinterrelatedgroupsisenvisionedtomaximizethesenseofcommunityandtooptimizesupportfunctions.

BuildingSupport/Retail:Thiscategoryofspaceincludessupportactivitiessuchas:supportstaff,loadingdock,5.storage,mailroom,etal.Inaddition,a3,000sfretail/foodvenueisplannedfortheIStreetsideofthebuilding,reinforcingtheretailcorridor.

Research& UpperLevelTeaching

Labs

Non-MajorTeachingLabs/Lecture/ Commons

Departments/ SEAS Dean

Building Support/Retail


J u n e 2 0 1 0

GraphicProgramSummary

8(Shell)

7(Shell)

6

5

4

3

2

G

LL1

LL2

Research Lab/ Lab Support12,375 NASF

Research Lab/ Lab Support12,375 NASF

Research Lab /Lab Support

14,025 NASF

Research Lab /Lab Support

14,025 NASF

Research Lab /Lab Support8,250 NASF




Research and Upper Level Teaching Labs Non-Majors Teaching Labsand Lecture / Commons

Department Of�ces / Dean Building Support /Retail

Totals

29,545 NASF(Shell)

29,545 NASF(Shell)

31,915 NASF

31,915 NASF

30,900 NASF

30,900 NASF

32,045 NASF

24,820 NASF

23,250 NASF

25,165 NASF

290,000 NASF13,800 NASF5%

26,920 NASF9%

37,850 NASF13%

211,430 NASF (Incl. 59,090 shelled at Levels 7 & 8)73%

Seminar1,320 NASF

Seminar1,320 NASF

Seminar1,320 NASF

Shared Instrument Cores1,980 NASF

Seminar1,320 NASF

Seminar1,320 NASF

Upper LevelTeaching Labs /

Lab Support10,890 NASF

6 Studio Teaching Labs /Lab Support

14,850 NASF

4 Studio Teaching Labs /Lab Support9,900 NASF

Study / Resource Center2,500 NASF

Study / Resource Center2,600 NASF

Retail / Food3,000 NASF

Bldg. Offices and Workstations2,400 NASF

Building Admin.Conference Room600 NASF

SEAS Dean’s Suite10,000 NASF

4 Dept. Chairs4 Admin. Assist.4 Storage2,400 NASF

31 Fac. Office3,720 NASF

2 Conference Rooms and Pantry1,440 NASF

Arrival / Breakout900 NASF

4 Dept. Chairs4 Admin. Assist.4 Storage2,400 NASF

31 Fac. Office3,720 NASF

2 Conference Rooms and Pantry1,440 NASF

Arrival / Breakout900 NASF

Receiving Area andMaterials Storage2,000 NASF

Lecture(160 Seats)4,000 NASF

Breakout / Interaction1,000 NASF

Core Facilities2,840 NASF

CoreFacilitiesHigh Bay

5,000 NASF

CoreFacilities

Slab on Grade4,000 NASF

15 PI Offices 1,800 NASF30 Post-Doc Workstations 1,800 NASF60 RA Workstations 1,800 NASF

17 PI Offices 2,040 NASF34 Post-Doc Workstations 2,040 NASF68 RA Workstations 2,040 NASF

10 PI Offices 1,200 NASF20 Post-Doc WKSTNS 1,200 NASF40 RA WKSTNS 1,200 NASF

5 PI Offices 600 NASF10 Post-Doc WKSTNS 600 NASF20 RA WKSTNS 600 NASF

5 PI Offices 600 NASF10 Post-Doc WKSTNS 600 NASF20 RA WKSTNS 600 NASF

3 Team Workrooms1,320 NASF

3 Team Workrooms1,320 NASF

2 Team Workrooms880 NASF

Breakout / Interactionand Pantry / Copy2,300 NASF


4 Admin. / Hotel Offices480 NASF


Team Workroom440 NASF


Stockroom /Central Glasswash1,800 NASF

Building Storage500 NASF

Building Storage500 NASF

Mailroom400 NASF

Computer Server / IT Workroom2,600 NASF


Team Workroom440 NASF

Seminar1,320 NASF






Upper Level Teaching Labs /Lab Support3,630 NASFShared Instrument Cores

2,640 NASF

Upper Level Teaching Labs /Lab Support3,630 NASF





3 Team Workrooms880 NASF


3 Team Workrooms880 NASFBreakout / Interactionand Pantry / Copy2,800 NASF



Building Commons3,000 NASF


J u n e 2 0 1 0

Overview ResearchandUpperLevelTeachingLabs(ConceptualLayouts)

DETAILED SPACE PROGRAM

Theobjectiveofthespaceprogram,inthegenericformpresentedhere,istoconsidertheneedsofthescienceandengineeringdisciplineswithalongtermframeofreference.Thismeansconceptualizingvariousscenariosfor:therelationshipbetweenthecampuscommunityandascienceandengineeringcommunity;thelearningexperiencesofnon-majors;thelearningrelationshipbetweenmajorsandresearchers;thecollaborativenatureofinterdisciplinaryresearch;thetechnologicaldevicesofresearchandtheinfrastructurewhichsupportsthem;andthecommunicationofresearchtopromoteitsapplicationtotheneedsofsociety.

Eachscenarioshouldbeabletobeconceptuallysupportedbytheframeworkofbuildingsystemsinitiatedinthedesignandconstructionofthebuilding.Thespatialfabricandthefundamentalinfrastructureofbuildingsystemsshouldbedesignedinanopen-endedfashiontoallowadditionalinvestmenttoexpandthecapabilitiesofsystemsasrequiredbyevolvingneeds.Inthiswaythecapabilitiesofthebuildingshouldbeacatalystforexperimentation.

Ineachcategoryofthespaceprogram,thisprincipleofalong-termandopen-endedviewofthebuilding’susehasbeenaguidetothestructureandcompositionoftheindividualprogramcomponentsandtheirrelationships.

Theprogramprovidesresearchspaceforatotalof94principalinvestigators(faculty)withspacefor30oftheseprincipalinvestigatorsdesignatedaspartofshelledspace.Onaverage,eachprincipalinvestigatorhas1,185netassignablesquarefeetoftotalresearchspace.825sfislabandlabsupportspace.360sfisofficeandworkstationspaceforoneprincipalinvestigator,twopostdoctorateresearchers,andfourresearchassistants(undergraduate,graduate,andpost-graduatestudents).

Theresearchlabandlabsupportspaceisconceivedasgeneric,flexible,andchangeablespacewhichallowsarangeofspecializationtomeetthedetailedneedsofspecificresearchgroups.Researchlayoutscanaccommodatesharedopenlabspaceordedicatedspace.Varioustypesoflabsupportspacescanbeprovidedinanumberofdifferentconfigurationpatterns.Labfurnitureismovablesuchthatitcanberepositionedorreplacedwithequipmentasdesired.Fumehoodsandsinkshaveplug-and-playcharacteristics,meaningtheycanbeaddedandsubtractedinpredeterminedlocations,asrequired.Utilitiesareprovidedfromtheceilingwithquickdisconnectfittingstomakechange-outofalabspacesimpleandwithminimalcost.

ThefabricofgenericandflexiblelabandlabsupportspacewillbegroupedintowetanddryzoneswithdifferentlevelsofHVACandpipedutilitiesservicedensities.

FlexibleResearchLabs TransparencyatPIOffices SeminarRoom/InteractionArea CoreFacilities:NMR

EngineeringResearchLab

Wet/DryScienceResearchLab

EngineeringResearchLab

Wet/DryScienceResearchLab

EngineeringTeachingLab

Wet/DryTeachingLab

EngineeringTeachingLab

Wet/DryTeachingLab

Inproximitytotheresearchlabs,flexibleupperlevelteachinglabsaresizedat1,320sftoaccommodate16students.Theprogramconceptofthelabsallowsthepedagogicalintegrationoflectureandlab.14labsareprovided(fourasshelledspace),whichifutilizedataschedulingdensityof20two-hoursessionsperweek,itisprojectedthat93coursesectionsof16studentscanbeaccommodated.Thecriticalfactorinthislevelofutilizationistheabilitytochange-outthematerialsinalabbetweensessionsbyusingmobilestorageunitsthatcanbestoredinanadjacentlabsupportcore.

Tenseminarroomsseating24peopleareprovided(fourasshelledspace).Thesespacescanbeconvertedtofiveadditionalupperlevelteachinglabs,whichcouldaccommodateanadditional33coursesections.

12,500sfofcorefacilitiesspaceisprovidedincluding5,000sfofhighbayspaceand4,000sfofslab-on-gradespaceforvibrationsensitiveequipment.Thisspacewillhaveamorerobustmechanical,electrical,andplumbinginfrastructuretoservethegreaterneedsofprogramspaceslocatedhere.


J u n e 2 0 1 0

Non-MajorTeachingLabs&Lecture/Commons(ConceptualLayouts)

DepartmentOffices/SEASDean(ConceptualLayouts)

BuildingSupport&Retail(ConceptualLayouts)

Tenstudioteachinglabsfornon-majorcoursesareprovidedonthepublicfloorsofthebuilding.Thelabsaresizedat1,980sftoaccommodate36students.Aswiththeupperlevellabs,theprogramconceptallowspeda-gogicalintegrationoflectureandlab.Withautilizationrateof20twohoursessionsperweek,itisprojectedthat66coursesectionsof36studentscanbeaccommodated.Anadjacentlabsupportcoretofacilitatethechange-outofmaterialsinthelabsupportsthislevelofutilization.

Otherprogramcomponentsthatsupportnon-majorsuseofthebuildingarea150seatforum,astudyresourcecenterandabuildingcommonsthatlinksthesecomponentsspatiallyandsociallywiththenon-majorsstu-diolabs.

Eightdepartmentcentersareprovidedwith62officesforfacultynotdirectlyassociatedwithresearchspaceinthebuilding.A10,000sfallowanceisprovidedfortheSEASDeanandassociatedprogramneeds.

Duringtheschematicdesignphase,thedepartmentalandDean'sofficespaceoutlinedintheprogramwillbedevelopedindetailwithGW,asanactivityintegraltotheexplorationofthedesign.

Buildingsupportprogramcanbegroupedintofourcategories:aretail/foodvenue,facilitiestosupporttheoperationofthebuilding,informationtechnologyservices,andmaterialsmanagement.

DuringtheschematicdesignphasethegenericfacilitiesoutlinedbytheprogramwillbedevelopedindetailwithGW,asanactivityintegraltotheexplorationofthebuildingdesign.

Departmental Office Suites FacultyOfficeStudioLab Commons Material Storage Retail/Food

EngineeringStudioTeachingLab

Wet/DryScienceStudioTeachingLab

EngineeringStudioTeachingLab

Wet/DryScienceStudioTeachingLab OfficeandWorkstation

Chair'sOffice Pantry

Conference Room Glasswash/Autoclave

FlammableStorage

Stock Room


J u n e 2 0 1 0

12

300-400Cars

HighBay/Cores

Non-MajorTeaching&Forum

Teaching/ResearchNeighborhoodsDepartments

SEAS Dean

P4 9'

P3 9'

P2 9'

P1 10'

LL2 18'

LL1 14'

G 14'

2 14'

3 14'

4

5

6

7

8

PH

Non-MajorTeaching&Forum

Teaching/ResearchNeighborhoods

Teaching/ResearchNeighborhoodsDepartments

AboveGrade

BelowGrade

23rdStreetSetback

40'

110'M

aximumInstitutes/Centers/Teaching

Institutes/Centers/Teaching

Shell(FutureCenters/Institutes/Teaching)

MEP

MEP/CUP

MEP/CUP

MEP/CUP

24'

16'

20'

BuildingSupport

Retail

BuildingSupport

BuildingSupport

14'

14'

14'

14'

14'

18'-6"

Shell(FutureCenters/Institutes/Teaching)

Conceptual Programming Section

TheSECiscomprisedofeightlevelsofprogramspaceabovegrade,twolevelsofprogramspacebelowgradeandfourlevelsofparking.Lowerlevel1andthegroundflooraretheprimarypublicfloorsofthefacilityandconsistofnon-majorstudiolabs,meetingspace,resourcecenterandbuildingservices.ThesetwofloorsareinterconnectedbyflooropeningstothesecondfloorwhichhousestheSEASDeanSuite,aconcentrationofupperlevelteachinglabsandresearchspace.Floors3-4aretheprimaryfloorsfordepartmentalofficesandteaching/researchneighborhoods.Floors5-8areprogrammedforresearchinsti-tutes/centersandincludeupperlevelteachinglaboratories.Floors7-8areintentionallyshelledtoallowflexibilityandtorespondtofuturepro-gramrequirements.MultipleflooropeningsintheTeaching/ResearchNeighborhoodsandInstitutesareenvisionedtoenhanceinterdisciplin-aryactivityandallowforverticalflexibilityofspaceassignments

VERTICAL ORGANIzATION

7-8

5-6

3-4

G

LL1

2

PH

LL2

P1-4


J u n e 2 0 1 0

13

OverviewofVerticalOrganization

Building Datum Line60.5’

Building Datum Line 60.5’

+/- 8.66’

Building Datum Line60.5’

Building Datum Line 60.5’

+/- 8.66’

SectionB(East/West)

SectionA(North/South)

Alloftheprogramfloorsaredesignedwith14'floor-to-floorheightsexceptlowerlevel2whichhas18'floor-to-floortoaccommodatescientificcores,vibrationsensitivespacesandhighbayfacilities.Withconcreteconstruc-tion,thesefloor-to-floorheightsareoptimizedtoprovideflexibilityforthefuture.Theheightofthebuildingisrestrictedbyzoningto110'abovegradeassumingasetzoningfloordatumatHStreet.Withgradevary-ingapproximately4'-6"fromahighpointatHStreettolowpointsatIand23rdStreets,thegroundfloorlevelissituatedslightlyaboveandbelowgraderelativetothisvaryinggradecondition.

Inadditiontothe110'heightlimit,zoningalsoimposesa90'heightrestric-tionat23rdStreet.Thus,levels7&8aresetbackfromthisstreetfrontagetoaccommodatethisheightrestriction.Furthermore,allrooftoppenthousespace,equipmentandscreenislimitedto18'-6"abovetherooflevelwithasetbackfromtheadjacentfrontagesequaltothisheight.

Thereareseveralbelowgradeissuesthatwillimpactthedesignteaminfuturephases.ThebelowgradeareaatIStreetisrestrictedbytheWMATAtunnelwhereadjacentbuildingfoundationsarerequiredtoremainabovethe45degreeangleofreposesetfromthebottomofthetunnel.Bed-rockvariesfromahighpointatHStreettoalowpointatIStreet.Finally,withtheanticipationoftwoprogramareasbelowgrade,localcodeofficialconsultationwillberequiredearlyinthenextdesignphasetodeterminetheextentofchemicalquantitylimitationsandcodeenhancementsrequiredtoaccommodatetheintendedprogram.

Section AI Street

H Street

23rdStreet

22ndStreet

Section B

Air Handling

Intercommunicating Stairs Between Levels

H Street

23rd Street

40' Setback

22nd Street

I Street

Square 54MadisonHall

RossMedicalSchool

AcademicCenter

WMATATunnel

High Bay

Garage

Office Wing

MechCooling Tower

Teaching/Research

Mech

Teaching/Research

Ramp

Approx Bedrock LocationElevation Varies 4'-15' WMATA Angle of Repose

Approx Bedrock LocationElevation Varies 4'-15'

18'6"

18'6"

18'6"

18'6"

110'

110'

Green Roof

Mech

Zoning

Zoning


J u n e 2 0 1 0

Shell:FutureCenters/Institutes/Teaching: Floors7/8

TEACHING/RESEARCHFLOORS&CENTERS

Institutes/Centers/UpperLevelTeachingResearch: Floors5/6



Women

Elevator

MenElec.

IDF

Kennedy Jacqueline Bouvier Onassis Residence Hall

Kennedy Jacqueline Bouvier Onassis Residence Hall Munson

Residence HallMunson

Residence Hall

Pantry

Research Lab

Research Lab

Research Lab

SharedCore

Research Lab

Research Lab

Research Lab

Admin

Admin Admin

Admin

Break-OutInteraction




Break-Out Interaction


TeamWork Room

Work Room


TeamWorkRoom

TeamWorkRoom

Work Room

Office Cluster

Upper LevelTeaching Lab

Lab Support


SeminarRoom

SeminarRoom

Green Roof (7th Floor) Open to Below

Open to Below

Core

Open to BelowOpen to

Below

Open to

Below

Open to Below

Open to Below

Open to Below

Open to

Below

Green House Location8th Floor

Secured Access


J u n e 2 0 1 0

Theorganizationalstrategyforthesefloorsistocreateadynamicinte-gratedenvironmentfocusedonresearch/teachingneighborhoods.Theorganizationalstrategyminimizescorridorlikeenvironmentsandprioritizesacomprehensibleplanforsimpleorientationandcirculation.Throughtheconsolidationofworkstationsandteamingspacesaroundcentralizedcom-monfunctions,interactionisprioritizedtoenhancecollaborativeinterdis-ciplinaryactivity.Withstudentaccessrequiredforteachinglaboratoriesandfacultyoffices,transparentgradientsofsecurityaredenotedtoprovidevisualintegrationwiththeresearchenvironmentwhilelimitingpublicac-cesstotheseareas.Openingsbetweenfloorswithcommunicatingstairsarestrategicallydistributedtoencouragefloor-to-floorinteractionandtosupportflexibilityforspaceassignments.Varyingdimensionsoflaboratoryspaceprovidesavarietyofresearchlayoutsconsistentwiththediversityofscienceandengineeringdisciplinesinherentintheprogram.Abundanttransparencybetweenspacesisdesiredtopromotecollaboration,energizetheenvironmentandtoprovidevisualaccesstonaturallightfromallareas.Floors7&8aredenotedasshellfloorsforfutureimplementationandareanticipatedtobeorganizedwiththesameplanningprincipalsastheTeaching/Researchfloorsbelow.

SectionKey

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

LEVEL 5

LEVEL 6

LEVEL 7

LEVEL 8

7/8

5/6

3/4

IntegratedTeaching&ResearchonEachFloor•

SensitivitytoSecurityForCertainTypesofResearch•

CentralizedSharedCommons•

CentralizedDepartmentSupportSpace•

MaximizeOpportunityforDaylighttoFaculty/PIOffices•

ProvideforStudentAccesstoFaculty/PIOffices•

KeyBuildingPrinciples

OverviewofTeaching/Research&Centers

TransparencyandOpenEnvironmentwillcreateanEngagingTeaching/ResearchEnvironment

CentralizedCommonFunctions/Floor-to-floorConnectionswillEnhanceCollaborativeInterdisciplinaryActivity

UpperLevelTeachingResearchNeighborhoods/Departments: Floors3/4

Pantry Copy Stg/ Workroom

ConferenceRoom

ConferenceRoom

TeamWorkRoom

TeamWorkRoom

Research Lab

Research Lab

Research Lab



TeachingSupport

TeachingSupport

Admin

Admin

Adm

in

Admin

Admin

Admin

Admin


Women

Elevator

MenElec.

IDF

Kennedy Jacqueline Bouvier Onassis Residence Hall Munson

Residence Hall

SharedCore









Department Offices

ChairOffice

ChairOffice

SeminarRoom

SeminarRoom

Open to

BelowOpen

to Below

Open to Below

Open to Below

Open to Below


J u n e 2 0 1 0

16

Level 2 Level G

THE PUBLIC DOMAIN




Studio Teaching Lab

Studio Teaching Lab

Studio Teaching Lab

Studio Teaching Lab

Research Lab

Retail

Retail

Conference

Resource Center

Teaching Support

Teaching Support

HazardousStorage

MailRoom

GarageElevator

GarageElevator

Building Admin

Garden

Building Commons

Entry Court

Loading Receiving

I Street

H Street

23rd Street 22nd Street

Pantry

ConferenceRoom

CopyStg /

Work Room

ConferenceRoom

TeamWorkRoom

Research Lab

Upper Level Teaching Lab




Teaching Support

Support

Admin

PostDoc

Admin

AdminAdmin

Admin




Open to Above

Open to Below






OfficeOffice

Office

SEAS DeansSuite

SEASDean'sSuite

SeminarRoom

SeminarRoom

Open to Below

ServiceElevator

Existing Elevation

Proposed Elevation

Secured Access

Women Women

Elevator Elevator

Men MenElec. Elec.

IDF IDF



J u n e 2 0 1 0

2

G

LL1

KeyBuildingPrinciples:PublicFloorsLower Level 1

Science&EngineeringTeachingShowcase•

Science&EngineeringRegionalHub(Symposiums)•

OpenCharacter:Horizontal/Vertical•

FlexibleArrangementtoAccommodateAVarietyofEvents•

Entries from Multiple Locations•

ProvideNaturalLighttoLowerLevelTeachingEnvironment•

TheSECwillbeascienceandengineering“hub”forGWwiththesethreefloorsrepresentingthe“PublicDomain”ofthefacility.Multipleentrancesconnecttoallstreetfrontagesandwillpromotethegroundfloorasanengagingpathwayandvibrantdestination.Withasignificantnumberofteachingspaceslocatedonthesethreelevels,acentralizedstairandmulti-pleflooropeningswillprovidevisualconnectionsandeasyaccessbetweenfloors.Inadditiontotheteachinglaboratories,adiversityofspacesinclud-ingademonstrationresearchlab,resourcecenter,interactionareas,studyspace,foodamenitiesandalecturehall/forumwillenhancethevitalityofthefacilityasamulti-purposevenue.

Toprovideefficientstudentaccessibility,thegroundandlowerlevelswillhouseallofthenon-majorstudioteachinglabs.Withanabundanceoftransparency,theseteachingspacesareinterspersedbetweenentrancesandbridgebetweeninside/outsidetocreateanengagingscientificandengineeringenvironment.Complimentingtheteachinglabsonthefloorsabove,thesecondfloorconsolidatesasignificantcomponentoftheupperlevelteachinglaboratoriesandprovidespublicaccesstotheSEASDean’soffices.Publiccirculationisorganizedaroundthesespacesforeasyori-entationandisenhancedbynaturallightfrommultiplesourcesincludingtransparencyintothelaboratoryenvironments.

OverviewofthePublicDomain

SectionKey

LOWER LEVEL 1

GROUND LEVEL

LEVEL 2

PhysicalandVisualInterconnectionsBetweenFloorsandDiversityofSpaceswillEnhancetheVibrancyoftheSEC

TransparencyintotheTeachingLabswillCreateanEngagingScientific/EngineeringEnvironment


MunsonResidence Hall

Studio Teaching Lab

Studio Teaching Lab

Studio Teaching Lab

Teaching Support

Teaching Support

Teaching Support

Teaching Support

Studio Teaching Lab

Studio Teaching Lab

Studio Teaching Lab

BuildingStorage

LectureHall

ResourceCenter

SkylightAbove

Commons

Open to Mechanical Below

Open to Below

Ramp

ParkingServiceElevator

Elevator IDF

Women Men




J u n e 2 0 1 0

18

Parking 1

LOWER LEVEL 2 AND GARAGE LEVELS

Lower Level 2



Core Facilities

VibrationSensitive

Slab on Grade

ResearchLab

StockroomGlasswash / Autoclave

High Bay High Bay

TeamWorkRoom

BuildingStorage

Storage

Parking

Ramp

IDF Elev.

MenWomen

Garage Storage

Card / Ticket Gates

ReversibleLane

RampUp

BuildingStorage

Existing Elevation

Proposed Elevation

Secured Access

ComputerServerFarm

IT Workroom

CPU Staging

Core Facilities

Break-OutInteraction / Pantry

ServiceElevator

ServiceElevator

Elevator

Elevator

Mechanical RoomM1

Mechanical RoomM2



J u n e 2 0 1 0

LL2

P1-4

Parking2-4

18’Floor-to-FloorforFlexibility•

SlabonGradeLocationforVibrationSensitiveFacilities•

LargeServiceElevatorwithDirectConnectiontoOn-GradeLoading•

“Drive-in”HighBayArea•

300-400Cars/2WayCirculation•

SpeedRamp@12%MaxtoSlopedParkingLevels@5%Max•

Ticket/CardStations@GarageLevel1•

ReversibleLaneatEntrance/ExitRamp•

24HourElevatorAccessfrom23rd&22ndStreetsSeparatedfromSEC•

KeyBuildingPrinciples:LowerLevel2

KeyBuildingPrinciples:ParkingLevels

LowerLevel2isprogrammedtoincludesharedcorefacilitiesfortheSEC.Withan18’floor-to-floorheight,thislevelisdesignedforsignificantflexibilityandincludesslabongradeareaforhighlysensitivevibrationfreespaces.Inadditiontoserverspace,centralstockroom/glasswashandupperlevelofthehighbayspaceonthislevel,aresearchneighborhoodisalsoanticipatedtoaccommodatelightsensitiveandhighfloor-to-floorspacerequirements.Alargeserviceelevatorconnectsboththislevelandthehighbayspacetothegroundfloorloadingzone.Thelowerlevelofthe28’floor-to-floorhighbayspacehasaslabongradeanddriveinaccessfromtheadjacentga-rage.

Caraccesstothegarageisviaacombinationstraight/circularspeedrampandaccommodatesapproximately300carson3½slopedtwo–waycirculationparkingrampsandupto400carsmaybeaccommodatedwith1additionallevel.Peopleaccessthegarageviatwoelevatorsthatconnecttoboth22ndand23rdstreetfrontagesandhave24/7hourac-cessoutsidethesecureenvelopeoftheSECabove.Thewestelevatorisalsoanticipatedtohavedualopeningstoprovideaccesstotheadjacentseriesofmechanicalrooms.

Overview of Lower Level & Parking

SectionKey

HighBaySpace

G4G3G2G1

LOWER LEVEL 2HIGH BAY

Elevator

Elevator ElevatorMachine

Room

ElevatorMachine

RoomMechanical RoomM3

Extent of P4


J u n e 2 0 1 0

Mechanical1-3PenthouseRoom

MECHANICAL BASE OPTION

Cooling Towers

AHU

AHU

AHU

AHU

AHU

AHU

AHU

AHU

AHU AHU

ScreenwallGreenhouse

Duct Above

Scre

enw

all

ATS

Emergency Generators

M3Pumps

Boilers

Feed Pumps

M2Pumps

Switchgear

Chillers

M1

AHU

Fan Fan

AHUSubstations

Substations

SectionKey

EmergencyGenerator

Pumps

PENTHOUSE

18'6"

18'6"


J u n e 2 0 1 0

Alternate Options OverviewofMechanicalSystem

ThemechanicalengineeringconceptsandoptionspresentedonthispagearepartofalargereffortoftheSystemsSubcommitteetoshapethetech-nicalcharacterofthedesignconceptinparallelwiththeprogrampresent-edonthepreviouspages.

Theadjacentsetofdiagrammaticplansreflectthebasisofdesign.ItsoriginistoservetheSECbuildingplusthethreedormitorybuildingsonSquare55:jBKO,FulbrightandMunson.Inthiscase,allequipmentwouldbeincludedintheSECinarooftoppenthouseandonthreelevelsofbase-mentmechanicalspace.

Inaddition,severalalternativepossibilitieswereexploredandarerepresent-edasalternates1-4.ThegenesisofthesealternatesistheagedconditionoftheequipmentinRossHall(37yearsold)andthepotentialforrealizingsubstantialsavingsbycombiningtheneedsofRossHallandSquare55.AllalternatesregardingRossHallproposedbelowutilizeexistingmechani-calspaceandwillnotimpactanyprogramareainthatfacility.Thesefouralternateswillformthebasisfordecisionintheschematicdesignphase.

Alternate #1:

ThisconceptisbasedontheboilersandchillersintheSECservingbothRossHallandtheSquare55residentialfacilities.

Alternate #2:

Thisoptionhasthesamebasisasoption1,andalsoincludesfeedingchilledwatertoRossHall.Additionally,theboilersinRossHallwouldbereplaced.Anundergroundutilityconnectionbelow23rdStreetwouldallowthecrossconnectionbetweenthetwositesasindicatedinthekeyplan.

Alternate #3:

ThethirdoptioninvolvesreplacingbothBoilerandChillersinRossHallthatwillalsoserveSquare55.Thiswillresultinreducedbelowgrademechani-calspaceattheSEC.

Alternate #4:

Thefourthoptioninvolvesthesamebasicstrategyasoption3,butaddsaco-generationsystemtotheconcept.

Eachoftheseoptionsrelyonthebelowgradeutilityconnectionunder23rdStreet.Preliminaryconversationsandexistingprecedentssuggestthisisfeasible.

# Size Type Location # Size Type Location # Size Location # Size Location # Size Location

All Components at Block 55

71000 Tons

Electric SEC 3 1500HPHot

WaterSEC 7

1000 Tons

SEC 31500 Kw

SEC

Feed chilled water to Ross from SEC

71600 Tons

Electric SEC 3 1500HPHot

WaterSEC 9

1200 Tons

SEC 31500 Kw

SEC

Feed chilled water to Ross from SEC and Feed hot water to SEC from Ross

71600 Tons

Electric SEC 240,000 lb/hr

Steam Ross 91200 Tons

SEC 31500 Kw

SEC

Feed everything from Ross

71600 Tons

Electric Ross 240,000 lb/hr


Ross 21500 Kw

SEC

Feed everything from Ross and add Co Generation

Co-Gen SystemOptions Chillers Boilers Cooling Towers Emergency Generators

Basis of Design

Alternate No. 1

Alternate No. 2

Alternate No. 3

Feed everything from Ross and add Co-Generation

51600 Tons

Electric Ross 140,000 lb/hr


Ross 21500 Kw

SEC 1 4.6Mw Ross

21600 Tons

Steam Ross

Alternate No. 4

HighPlumeInductionExhaustFanCo-Generation AlternateKeyPlan

Fulbright Residence

Hall

Munson Residence

Hall

SEC

H Street

Tunnel

Utility Connection

I Street

Mechanical Room

23rd

Stre

et

22nd

Stre

et

24th

Stre

et

RossMedical School

Kennedy Jacqueline

Bouvier Onassis

Residence Hall


J u n e 2 0 1 0

GuidingPrincipleNo.1

CREATE A CULTURE OF SUSTAINABILITY

The SEC will seek to signal the University’s commitment to sustainability and enable and inspire sustainable behavior.

STRATEGIC IDEAS

TheSECwillseekto:

DemonstratetheUniversity’scommitmenttoitsClimateActionPlanbystrivingforcarbonneutrality(through•energyefficiencyandpurchaseofgreenpower).

Havelargeopenspacesforthebuildingcommunitytogather.•

Maximizenaturallighting.•

Provideinvitingstairwayswhichintegratesocialfunctions.•

Emphasizebuildingfeaturesthatwillstillberelevantin100yearsandfacilitatetheeasychangeofcertain•features(e.g.modularflooring,lightingupgrades).

Focusonsustainabilityfeatureswithlong-termimpactsuchasefficiencyofenergyandwatersystems,•wasteenergycaptureandreuse,stormandwastewatercaptureandreuse,andmaterialwastereduction.

Createacommunitygatheringspacethatshowcasessustainabilityfeaturesandresearchasadisplay.•

Usereclaimedmaterialswheneverpossible.•

Havesignagehighlightingthebuilding’ssustainablefeatures.•

Encouragelocally-sourcedwholefood.•

SustainabilityGuidingPrincipals

SustainabilityisacriticalcomponentoftheprogramminganddesignfortheSEC.WiththeUniversityinthemidstoftheprocessofestablishingaclimateactionplan,theSECisamajoropportunitytocontributetothegoalsandobjectivesofthisinitiative.SustainabilitywillbeanintegralcomponentoftheSEAS/CCASprogramanticipatedforthisfacilityandthesustainableaspectsofthebuildingandsystemsshouldenhancethepeda-gogyoftheseprograms.Inaddition,asaregionalcenterforscienceandengineering,thisfacilityrepresentsasignificantopportunitytoshowcaseGWasaleaderinurbansustainability.

Throughaseriesofworkshopsattendedbyabroadsetofcampusconstituencies,thefollowingGuidingPrin-ciplesandStrategicIdeashavebeendevelopedasabasisforguidingtheforthcomingdesignprocess.WithLEEDSilverCertificationasafoundation,theseprinciplesandstrategieswillpositionthefacilityasasignificantcontributortoGW’ssustainabilitygoalsandobjectives.

SUSTAINABILITY


J u n e 2 0 1 0

GuidingPrincipleNo.3GuidingPrincipleNo.2

ENGAGE WITh ThE BUILDING AS A LEARNING LABORATORY

The SEC will seek to influence the behavior of students, faculty, and staff by way of active engagement with the building as a living laboratory which measures, monitors, and displays the performance of the building’s energy and water systems.

STRATEGIC IDEAS

TheSECwillseekto:

Containtechnologytoviewbuildingenergyandwaterperformancetocreatelearningopportunitiesto 1. understandenergyandwaterflowsoftheurbanmicroclimateandwatershed.

Provide"livinglaboratory"spaceforstudentstostudysustainabilityandtofurtherexplorationofrenewable2. technologies.

Demonstratedifferenttypesofrenewableenergytechnologiesandenergyefficiencyoptions. 3.

INTEGRATE ThE BUILDING INTO ThE URBAN ECOSYSTEM

The SEC will seek to be a positive contributor to the urban ecosystem that minimizes energy use, water use, and waste, supports low carbon transportation and sustainable food, provides sustainable land-scapes, and low carbon technologies.

STRATEGIC IDEAS

TheSECwillseekto:

Maximizeenergyefficientdesignandtechnologies.1.

Encouragesustainablecommutingmethods(e.g.,showersandracksforbikecommutingandcharging 2. stationsforelectricvehicles).

ProtectthePotomacwatershedbyreducing/eliminatingrun-off,providingin-buildingwaterfiltrationto 3. eliminatebottledwater,minimizingwateruseinHVACandotherbuildingsystems,meteringwateruseinlaboratories,andusingnative,historicalplantings.

Includeexamplesofsustainableurbanlandscaping.4.

Minimizenoise,heat,andlightpollutionandpromotehumancomfort.5.

Havebuildingfloor-platesandbuildingsystemsdesignedforlongevityandchangeabilitywiththeability 6. tochange-outbuildingprogramusesovertimeviathereuse/recyclingofbuildingcomponentswith minimal waste.

Supportlocallysourcedorganicwholefood.7.

Integratewiththecommunityatthestreetlevelbyshowcasingsustainabilityinitiativesandresearchbeing8. conductedinthebuilding.


J u n e 2 0 1 0

BENCHMARKING STUDY: METRICS

SpaceBenchmarkingAnalysis

OVERVIEW

ThisBenchmarkingStudywasaparalleleffortwiththeProgrammingStudyandwasusedtogatherinformationfrompeersandaspirationalpeerstoinformtheplanningprocessforthenewScienceandEngineeringComplexatTheGeorgeWashingtonUniversity.Twotypesofinformationweregathered:datarelatedtospace,faculty,andstudentmetrics,andstrategicinformationrelatedtotheplanningandvisionbehindanewinterdisciplinary researchfacility.

InadditiontoTheGeorgeWashingtonUniversity,thefollowingeightschoolsparticipatedinthestudy:BostonUniversity • UniversityofMaryland•DukeUniversity • UniversityofVirginia•NewyorkUniversity • WakeForestUniversity•NorthwesternUniversity • WashingtonUniversity•

Space Distribution

GW EXISTING BENCHMARKING AVERAGE GW PROPOSED

Research33%

Teaching23%

Office43.5%

Other.5%

Research45%

Teaching15%

Office28%

Other12%

Research38%

Teaching26%

Office24%

Other13%

Research33%Office

44%

Other0%

Research45%Office

28%

Other12%

Research38%

Office36%

Other6%

Research33%

Teaching23%

Office44%

Other0%

Research45%

Teaching15%

Office28%

Other12%

Research38%

Teaching20%

Office36%

Other6%

Research33%

Teaching23%

Office43.5%

Other.5%

Research45%

Teaching15%

Office28%

Other12%

Research38%

Teaching26%

Office24%

Other13%

SPACE ALLOCATION METHODS

University Research Funding/SFFunding/ Potential

Funding/Expectations for

Growth

Number of People Combination of Factors

George Washington University

Washington University

Boston University

Duke University

New York University

Northwestern University

University of Maryland

University of Virginia

Wake Forest University

SUMMARyOFFINDINGS

Space Distribution

Asindicatedbytheadjacentpiechartdiagrams,theexistingspaceallocationforGWreflectsthecurrentstateofresearchactivityattheUniversity.Thenewfacility,withincreasedemphasisonresearch,willmorecloselyalignwiththeresearchallocationatthebenchmarkedinstitutions.

Research Space

Theamountofresearchspaceperfulltimefacultymemberwasanalyzedonmultiplelevels,includinganoverallcombinationofscienceandengineering,scienceonly,engineeringonly,andalsoonan individualdepartmentbasis.Therewasabroadrangebetweentheschools,withasignificanthigheraverageresearchallocationperfacultyforthesciences(2,011sf/faculty)thanfortheengineeringdisciplines(1,300sf/faculty).

Research Expenditure

Researchexpenditurewasanalyzedonaresearchfundingpersquarefootbasisaswellasaresearchfundingperfacultybasis.Thesedatawereanalyzedatmultiplelevels,similartotheresearchspacedatametricsdescribedabove.Theresultingfindingsshowedanextremelybroadrangeoffundingpersquarefootinthesciences,withamuchnarrowerrangeoffundingpersquarefootintheengineeringdisciplines.Averagefundingpersquarefootinthesciencesisapproximatelytwiceasmuchasthatfoundinengineering.

155,000NSF 290,000NSF


J u n e 2 0 1 0

RESEARCHSPACE/FACULTy

Overall

Overall

Science

Science

Engineering

Engineering

0 SF 2,500 SF1,000 SF500 SF 2,000 SF

AVG1,588 SF / FACULTY

1,113

GW EXISTING662 SF / FACULTY

PROPOSED1,185 SF / FACULTY

2,329



2,5401,510

1,160450



1,450680

770436

$0 $800400200 600

AVG$247/SF

36

GW EXISTING$112/SF

464

0 8 1042 6

AVG4.53 GRADS / FACULTY

2.18

GW EXISTING7.17 GRADS / FACULTY

7.85

AVG$328/SF

GW EXISTING$71/SF

80573

17533

AVG$168/SF

GW EXISTING$145/SF

20198

463110

RESEARCHExPENDITURES/SQUAREFOOT

GRADSTUDENTS/FACULTy

Benchmark

GW

Benchmark

GW

Benchmark

GW

Benchmark

GW

NEW PEDAGOGY: STUDIO TEACHING LABS

ClassLab:LectureMode

ClassLab:MoveableSittingHeightBenches

ClassLab:WorkGroup/Technology


J u n e 2 0 1 0

AcademicProgramBenchmarking-SummaryofResponsestoKeyIssues

STRATEGy:WHOSETSTHEVISION?

Thestrategyissetbybothtop-downandbottom-upapproacheswherebythefinalacademicvisionandbuild-ingplanistheresultofajointadministrationandfacultyeffort.WhiletheUniversityleadershipusuallyidentifiesbroadinstitutionalobjectivesandpriorities,theDeansandfacultyeventuallyplayagreaterroleinthespecificsofhowacertainstrategyistoberealized.Thetrendsoflatearetofocusmoreoninterdisciplinaryinitiativesandbuildingsthatcomplementexistingdisciplinaryspecificprogramsandbuildings.Whilepresidentsandprovostsplayagreaterroleinchampioningacrossschoolsinterdisciplinaryprograms,Deansplayamuchgreaterroleinacrossdepartment(s)interdisciplinaryprograms.

WHATISyOURACADEMICPROGRAMSTRUCTURE:RESEARCH/TEACHING?

Alloftheschoolssurveyedhavestrongdepartmentalidentitieswithdesignateddepartmentspecificspace,academicstructureandpromotionandtenureprocesses.Manyinstitutionshavecreatedadditionalinterdisci-plinaryresearchcentersandinstitutes,typicallyhousedindesignatedspacestoencouragecrossfertilization.Someinstitutionshaveobservedthatevenininterdisciplinaryspaces,facultytendtocoalesceintodepartmentandsubjectspecificgroupings,sothelevelofsuccessismixed.Theimportanceofclusteringbuildingsinengi-neering,scienceandmedicinewasstressedinordertofostercloserinteractionamongmultipledisciplines.Theimportanceofsharedcorefacilitiestodrawinterdisciplinaryresearchgroupswasstressed.

Itwasstressedthatcurriculummustdrivetheactivitiesinthebuildingandthebuildingdesign,ratherthantheotherwayaround.Theimportanceofdesigningflexibilityintothebuildingdesignwasstressedrepeatedlyasini-tialplansdonotalwaysmatchtherealitiesandtheunexpectedopportunitiesthatpresentthemselvesoncethebuildingiscompleted.Increasingly,researchplaysamoreprominentroleinundergraduatestudies,especiallyatthoseinstitutionswherethereisastructuredresearchrequirementbuiltintoundergraduatecurricula.Whileitisimportanttohaveabuildingdesignthatfostersgreatervisibilityofresearchandresearchlaboratories,itiscriticalthatresearchbeincorporatedintotheundergraduatecurriculatoreallyfosterundergraduateresearch.Almostallschoolsstressedtheimportanceofhavingteachingfacilitiesthatenablebothlectureandhands-onlaboratoryactivitiestotakeplaceinthesameroom(e.g.,thestudiomodel).Further,theimportanceofsocialspacethatencouragesstudents(andfaculty)tospendmoretimeinthebuildingandtofostermoreacademiccollaborationandideaexchangeswasstressed.

WHATISyOURACADEMICPROGRAMSTRATEGyFORTHEFUTURE?

Duetothecurrenteconomicclimate,manyoftheuniversitieshavesloweddowntheirnewinitiatives.Mostinitiativesaredrivenbynewresearchprogramsratherthannewteachingandpedagogy.Inturn,theseresearchinitiativesaredrivenbyseveralfactors,suchas,newfundingopportunitiesforresearchcentersandinstitutes,pressingneedstoreplaceoutofdatephysicalinfrastructureandtheincreasingneedforcollaborationacrossthescienceandengineeringdisciplines.Mostuniversitiesaredevelopinginterdisciplinaryresearchviathefor-mationofnewinstituteswherefacultyarehiredintothetraditionaldepartmentsbuthaveastrongaffiliationwithinstituteactivities.Alluniversitiesappeartobechallengedbythecostofprovidingbothdisciplinespecificspaceaswellasspacefosteringinterdisciplinaryactivity.Degreescontinuetobelargelyadministeredbytraditionaldepartmentsatmostuniversities,thoughsomeindicatedthatinstitutesdevelopandawarddegrees.

BENCHMARKING STUDY: STRATEGIC ISSUES

HOWDOyOUHANDLEFACULTyGROWTH-ESPECIALLyWITHRESPECTTOCHANGE?

Therequestforadditionalfacultyusuallycomesfromthedepartmentsandtheserequestsareescalatedtoleadership.Atthecollegeleveltheneedforgrowthinmultipleareasishandledbyacomparisonoftherespec-tivemeritsoftheproposalsfromthedepartments.TheDeansaddresstheserequestsbasedonprogrammaticneedsandtheopportunitytopursuefundingopportunitiesinnewareasofresearch.Thespacegrowthishandledbyacombinationofmechanisms,suchaskeepingsomespaceinreservethatanticipatesgrowth,real-locatingspaceresourcesbasedoncurrentandanticipatedresearchfundingandonoccasionrentalspace(asashorttermsolution).Thefundsrequiredtofundthesalariesandstart-uppackagesofnewfacultyareusuallyaddressedattheprovostlevel.Universitieswithwell-establishedandwell-fundedinstitutesalsoutilizeinstitutefundstosupportfacultysalaries,spaceneedsandstart-upexpenses.

HOWDOyOUHANDLERESEARCHSUPPORT-STAFFING,LOCATION,ETC?/ HOWISSPACEASSIGNED?

Therewasacommonpatternacrossalluniversitiesinthemannerinwhichspaceisallocated.Thespaceallocationsinthemedicalschoolsaredonebyclearmetricsofdollarspersquarefeet.However,thespaceallocationmetricsforthescienceandengineeringprogramsemployseveralfactors,suchas,currentfunding,anticipatedresearchfunding,andprogrammaticbalanceamongdisciplines.Assuch,thescienceandengi-neeringschoolstendtobemoresubjectiveintheirapproachofallocatingspacecomparedtothemoreformalmetricsemployedbytheirrespectivemedicalschools.Deansandprovostsacknowledgedthatmetricsbecomemoreimportantwhenthereisanundersupplyofspaceandwhenmoreurgentspacedemandsneedtobead-dressed.

Mostuniversitieshavetraditionaldepartmentspaceandadditionalinterdisciplinaryresearchspace.Typically,thelattercategoryconstitutesmostoftheirnewerspace.Inthiscontext,mostofthenewerspaceisnot“owned”byanygivenindividualorprogrambutisreallocatedbasedonabroadproductivityassessmentbytheDeanandschoolleadership.Thespaceforresearchinstitutesandcenterstendtobedispersedlargelyduetohistori-calreasonswherefacultyfrommanydisciplineswereformallybroughtundertheumbrellaofaninstitutewhilecontinuingtousetheirspaceintheirrespectivedepartments.Thereisadesiretocollocatesuchactivities(ifandwhenresourcescanbeidentified)inneworrenovatedbuildingstofostergreaterlevelsofcollaboration.

Anothercommonthemeistheinterminglingofresearch/teachinglaboratoriesofmultipledisciplinesbasedontheircommonsupportandinfrastructureneeds,suchascollocationofChemistryandBiologylaboratoriesonthesamewingorhallway.Schoolsalsoemphasizedtheneedtohaveabalancebetweenthedemandsoftheresearchersvs.thenecessitytoallocatespaceforteachingandotherprogrammaticneeds.Hence,apurelyresearchfundingbasedspaceallocationmodelisnotalwaysapplicablewherethereisastrongresponsibilitytoensurethatadequateresourcesareallocatedtofulfilltheteachingmission.


J u n e 2 0 1 0

HAVE YOU TAKEN ON ANY NEW PEDAGOGICAL STRATEGIES IN THE SCIENCES ORENGINEERING?

Alluniversitiesstressedtheneedtohavemoreattractiveandcurrentspacetomeettheirteachingneeds.BostonUniversity,inparticular,stressedtheirneedtohavemorestudiotypeclassrooms,sincetheircurrentteachingspaceisofmixedquality.TheUniversityofMarylandwasquiteproudinthesuccessoftheirmixedlecture/laboratorytypeteachingspacesintheirnewKimBuilding.Theyemphasizedthatsuchfacilitiesareusedquiteeffectivelybymultiplecoursesandprograms,henceincreasingefficiency.Duetothesuccessofsuchstudiotypeteachingspaces,UMDplanstoincreasethenumberofsuchteachingspacesasmorefacultyareconvincedofthevalueofsuchlaboratoriesuponteachinginthoserooms.UniversityofVirginiahighlightedtheirchangeinpedagogyenhancedbyutilizingstudiotypelaboratories,especiallytheirnewITEBuilding.Amongalltheschools,thecouplingofbuildingdesigntopedagogyisparticularlynoteworthyforNorthwesternUni-versity.Theyutilizeopenspaces,socialspaces,andvisiblelaboratoriestofosteragreatersenseofstudentcollaborationandacademicengagement,asattestedbytheirAssociateProvost.Thisstrategyhasresultedintheincreaseinboththequalityandquantityofstudentapplications.Therefore,theGWteambelievesthatthiswouldbeagoodplacetovisitinordertoexplorehowthisstrategyworksandhowitcanbeadaptedtoGW'snewbuilding.Inthiscontext,anothernoteworthyexampleistheLINKCenteratDukeUniversitywheresocialspaces,flexibleteachingspacesandtechnicalsupporthavebeencleverlydesignedandmixedintoonefloor/wingoftheirlibrary.

Mostschoolscontinuedtoadministernewprogramswithintheirtraditionaldepartmentstructures,withthenotedexceptionofDuke,wherenewinstitutesdevelopnewmajors,suchasinNeurosciencethisisunusualsinceitisnotadministrativelyhousedinadepartment,butintheDukeInstituteforBrainScienceandincludesfacultyfromNeurobiologyandMedicalSchool.

OTHER/FOLLOW-UPISSUES:

AlloftheacademicandadministrativeleaderswhocontributedtothisstudywereextremelyhelpfulandofferedtohostGWvisitorsiforwhenvisitstotheirrespectiveinstitutionsareplanned.Visitingtheseinstitutionsoffersanopportunitytoseefirst-handwhatthebuildingsandspaceslooklike,learnabouttheacademicexperienceofthefacultyinsuchspaces,andunderstandhowstudentsutilizesuchspaces.

Inclosing,theBenchmarkingSubcommitteewouldliketoexpresstheirthankstoElizabethMahon,AssociatePrincipalandEdButler,SeniorAssociateofBallingerfororganizingandfacilitatingthesevaluableconversations.

TheChildren'sHospitalofPhiladelphiaColketTranslationalResearchBuilding

TypicalResearchLab

TempleUniversitySchoolofMedicine

StudySpace

UniversityofWisconsinWisconsinInstitutesforDiscovery

FirstFloorClassroom

SELECT PROJECT BENCHMARKING VISITS:


J u n e 2 0 1 0

SamehBadie,PhD,PE•Associate Professor of Civil Engineering

RobinBernstein,PhD•Assistant Professor of Anthropology

AlisonBrooks,PhD•Professor of Anthropology and International Affairs

ChrisCahill,PhD•Associate Professor of Chemistry

VincentChiappinelli,PhD•Chair of the Department of Pharmacology & Physiology,

Professor of Pharmacology & Physiology

DavidS.Dolling,PhD•Dean, Engineering & Applied Science Professor of

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

RobertDonaldson,PhD•Undergraduate Advisor in the Department of Biological

Sciences, Professor of Biology

CynthiaDowd,PhD•Assistant Professor of Chemistry

IoannisEleftherianos,PhD•Associate Professor of Biological Sciences

jerryFeldman,PhD•Associate Professor of Physics

SusanGillmor,PhD•Assistant Professor of Chemistry

HaraldGriesshammer,PhD•Assistant Professor of Physics

SamerHamdar,PhD•Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering

HermannHelgert,PhD•Professor of Engineering and Applied Science

MichaelKing,PhD•Chair of the Department of Chemistry, Professor of

Chemistry

CanE.Korman,PhD•Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Studies,

Professor of Engineering & Applied Science

RogerLang,PhD•Professor of Engineering and Applied Science

FrankLee,PhD•Deputy Chair of the Department of Physics, Associate

Professor of Physics

D.jeffreyLenn,PhD•Professor of Strategic Management, Associate VP of

Academic Operations

DianaLipscomb,PhD•Chair of the Department of Biological Sciences,

Professor of Biology, R.L. Weintraub Chair

MurrayLoew,PhD•Professor of Engineering

j.HoustonMiller,PhD•Professor of Chemistry

GuillermoOrti,PhD•Associate Professor of Biology

RandallPacker,PhD•Associate Dean for Special Projects, Professor of Biology

WilliamParke,PhD•Acting Co-Chair of the Department of Physics, Professor of Physics

MarthaPardavi-Horvath,PhD•Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering

MichaelPlesniak,PhD•Chair of the Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineer,


DavidRamaker,PhD•Professor of Chemistry

MarkReeves,PhD•Professor of Physics

BrianRichmond,PhD•Associate Professor of Anthropology

PegBarratt,PhD•Dean of the Columbian College of Arts & Sciences

BarryBerman,PhD•Chair of the Department of Physics, Professor of Physics

DavidS.Dolling,PhD•Dean, Engineering & Applied Science Professor of

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

MichaelKing,PhD•Chair of the Department of Chemistry, Professor of

Chemistry



ThomasMazzuchi,DSc•Chair of the Department of Engineering Management &

Systems Engineering, Professor of Engineering

Management & Systems Engineering

MichaelPlesniak,PhD•Chair of the Department of Mechanical & Aerospace

Engineer, Professor of Engineering & Applied Science

W.M.KimRoddis,PhD•Chair of the Department of Civil & Environmental

Engineering, Professor of Civil & Environmental

Engineering

BernardWood,MD,PhD,DSc•University Professor of Human Origins, Professor of

Human Evolution Anatomy

Abdouyousseff,PhD•Chair of the Department of Computer Science, Professor

of Engineering & Applied Science

Monazaghloul,PhD•Chair of the Department of Electrical & Computer

Engineering, Professor of Engineering & Computer

Engineering

DEANS/CHAIRSFORUM FACULTyFORUMTeam Structure

SALUTE TO THE PARTICIPANTSREVISED TEAM STRUCTURE: INTERACTION

DAVID DOLLING

Engineering

PEG BARRATT

Columbian College

DEANS

Civil/EnvironEngineering

ComputerScience

Electrical/Comp. Eng.

Eng. Mgmt/Systems

Mechanical/Aerospace

Biology ChemistryHominid

PaleobiologyPhysics

ENGINEERING & APPLIED SCIENCE (SEAS) COLUMBIAN COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES (CCAS)SCHOOL OFMEDICINE

TOTAL OF 9 DEPARTMENTS

BOARD OF TRUSTEES STEERING COMMITTEE

KimRoddis

AbdouYoussef

MonaZaghloul

ThomasMazzuchi

MichaelPlesniak

DianaLipscomb

MichaelKing

BernardWood

BarryBerman

G E O R G E W A S H I N G T O N U N I V E R S I T Y

STEVENKNAPP

President

DONALDLEHMAN

EVP Academic

LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE

LEOCHALUPA

VP Research

LOUISKATZ

EVP Treasurer

Damona

Smith

Strautmanis

Vincent

Chiappinelli

Boston Prop.

CanKorman

SEAS

RandallPacker

CCAS

JeffLenn

Academic Ops

HermannHelgert

Faculty Senate

AliciaO’Neil

Ops/Budget SMHS

Linda

Werling

SMHS

OPERATING COMMITTEE

OtherCollaborators

OtherCollaborators

STUDENTS

REVISED TEAM STRUCTURE: INTERACTION

DAVID DOLLING

Engineering

PEG BARRATT

Columbian College

DEANS


ComputerScience


Eng. Mgmt/Systems



PaleobiologyPhysics




KimRoddis

AbdouYoussef

MonaZaghloul

ThomasMazzuchi

MichaelPlesniak

DianaLipscomb

MichaelKing

BernardWood

BarryBerman


STEVENKNAPP

President

DONALDLEHMAN

EVP Academic


LEOCHALUPA

VP Research

LOUISKATZ

EVP Treasurer

Damona

Smith

Strautmanis

Vincent

Chiappinelli

Boston Prop.

CanKorman

SEAS

RandallPacker

CCAS

JeffLenn

Academic Ops

HermannHelgert

Faculty Senate

AliciaO’Neil

Ops/Budget SMHS

Linda

Werling

SMHS

OPERATING COMMITTEE

OtherCollaborators

OtherCollaborators

STUDENTS


DAVID DOLLING

Engineering

PEG BARRATT

Columbian College

DEANS


ComputerScience


Eng. Mgmt/Systems



PaleobiologyPhysics




KimRoddis

AbdouYoussef

MonaZaghloul

ThomasMazzuchi

MichaelPlesniak

DianaLipscomb

MichaelKing

BernardWood

BarryBerman


STEVENKNAPP

President

DONALDLEHMAN

EVP Academic


LEOCHALUPA

VP Research

LOUISKATZ

EVP Treasurer

Damona

Smith

Strautmanis

Vincent

Chiappinelli

Boston Prop.

CanKorman

SEAS

RandallPacker

CCAS

JeffLenn

Academic Ops

HermannHelgert

Faculty Senate

AliciaO’Neil

Ops/Budget SMHS

Linda

Werling

SMHS

OPERATING COMMITTEE

OtherCollaborators

OtherCollaborators

STUDENTS


DAVID DOLLING

Engineering

PEG BARRATT

Columbian College

DEANS


ComputerScience


Eng. Mgmt/Systems



PaleobiologyPhysics




KimRoddis

AbdouYoussef

MonaZaghloul

ThomasMazzuchi

MichaelPlesniak

DianaLipscomb

MichaelKing

BernardWood

BarryBerman


STEVENKNAPP

President

DONALDLEHMAN

EVP Academic


LEOCHALUPA

VP Research

LOUISKATZ

EVP Treasurer

Damona

Smith

Strautmanis

Vincent

Chiappinelli

Boston Prop.

CanKorman

SEAS

RandallPacker

CCAS

JeffLenn

Academic Ops

HermannHelgert

Faculty Senate

AliciaO’Neil

Ops/Budget SMHS

Linda

Werling

SMHS

OPERATING COMMITTEE

OtherCollaborators

OtherCollaborators

STUDENTS


DAVID DOLLING

Engineering

PEG BARRATT

Columbian College

DEANS


ComputerScience


Eng. Mgmt/Systems



PaleobiologyPhysics




KimRoddis

AbdouYoussef

MonaZaghloul

ThomasMazzuchi

MichaelPlesniak

DianaLipscomb

MichaelKing

BernardWood

BarryBerman


STEVENKNAPP

President

DONALDLEHMAN

EVP Academic


LEOCHALUPA

VP Research

LOUISKATZ

EVP Treasurer

Damona

Smith

Strautmanis

Vincent

Chiappinelli

Boston Prop.

CanKorman

SEAS

RandallPacker

CCAS

JeffLenn

Academic Ops

HermannHelgert

Faculty Senate

AliciaO’Neil

Ops/Budget SMHS

Linda

Werling

SMHS

OPERATING COMMITTEE

OtherCollaborators

OtherCollaborators

STUDENTS

FACULTyFORUM,CONTINUED


J u n e 2 0 1 0

SUSTAINABILITyFORUMSySTEMSFORUM STUDENTFORUM

CanE.Korman,PhD•Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Studies,


RogerLang,PhD•Professor of Engineering and Applied Science

FrankLee,PhD•Deputy Chair of the Department of Physics, Associate

Professor of Physics

D.jeffreyLenn,PhD•Professor of Strategic Management, Associate VP of

Academic Operations



MurrayLoew,PhD•Professor of Engineering

j.HoustonMiller,PhD•Professor of Chemistry

GuillermoOrti,PhD•Associate Professor of Biology


WilliamParke,PhD•Acting Co-Chair of the Department of Physics, Professor of Physics

MarthaPardavi-Horvath,PhD•Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering

MichaelPlesniak,PhD•Chair of the Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineer,


DavidRamaker,PhD•Professor of Chemistry

MarkReeves,PhD•Professor of Physics

BrianRichmond,PhD•Associate Professor of Anthropology

W.M.KimRoddis,PhD•Chair of the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering,

Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering

yin-LinShen,PhD•Professor of Engineering and Applied Science

ChetSherwood,PhD•Associate Professor of Anthropology

PedroSilva,PhD•Associate Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering

CourtneySmith,PhD•Professor of Biological Sciences

BernardWood,MD,PhD,DSc•Chair, University Professor of Human Origins,

Professor of Human Evolution Anatomy

AkosVertes,PhD•Deputy Chair of the Department of Chemistry,

Professor of Chemistry

WasylWasylkiwskyj,PhD•Professor of Engineering and Applied Science

Abdouyousseff,PhD•Chair of the Department of Computer Science,


Monazaghloul,PhD•Chair of the Department of

Electrical & Computer Engineering, Professor

of Engineering & Computer Engineering

Vesnazderic,PhD•Assistant Professor of Engineering and

Applied Science

Alta Berger•Student

Jon Binetti•Student

CatherineFahey•Student

jerynKoritzinsky•Student

Will Rone•Student

jonTorrey•Student

Evan Tusini•Student

FlorenceWong•Student

julieBindelglass•Student

GinaFernandes•Presidential Administrative Fellow,

Office of Real Estate

DylanPyne•Student

Art Bean Jr.•Director of Facilities Project Management

MeghanChapple-Brown•Director of the Office of Sustainability

Susan-AnneCora•Director of Real Estate Planning & Project Management

jerryFeldman,PhD•Associate Professor of Physics

GinaFernandes•Presidential Administrative Fellow, Office of Real Estate

NancyGiammatteo•Director of Planning and Environmental Management

EricaHayton•HR Strategic Development Manager

StephenHsu,PhD•Professor of Engineering and Applied Science

CanE.Korman,PhD•Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Studies, Professor of

Engineering & Applied Science


CaseyAnnePierzchala•Sustainability Project Assistant

johnRalls•Special Advisor for Community & Outreach

RumanaRiffat,PhD•Professor of Civil Engineering

W.M.KimRoddis,PhD•Chair of the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering,

Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering

PedroSilva,PhD•Associate Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering

SophieWaskow•Stakeholder Engagement Coordinator

MuheiddinAman•Associate Director of Parking Services

Art Bean Jr.•Director of Facilities Project Management

LarryCohen•Director of Parking Services

FrancisDemes•Assistant Chief UPD

NancyGiammatteo•Director of Planning and Environmental Management

MichaelHowell•Supervisor of Electrical Maintenance

johnHuennekens•Engineering Manager

juanIbanez,jr.•Executive Director of Facilities, Associate VP of Facilities

TinKyi•Senior Electrician

RobertOakley•Engineer, FMN Engineering Maintenance

Paul Riebel•Information Systems Infrastructure Coordinator

RonSchreiber•Manager of ISS, Voice, Data and Video Communications

jimSchrote•Director of Facilities Management

HaroldSpeed•Assistant Director of Facilities Operations

Doug Spengel•Manager of Energy and Environmental Programs

DavidSodero•G World Technical Manager

Vernon Weisenburg•Information Systems Coordinator

FACULTyFORUM,CONTINUED

science & engineering complex benchmarking & programming · 2013. 9. 13. · workshop 4 -...

Documents