sceleton framework and some resultssceleton framework and some results 13.3.2015 juha kiviluoma,...

23
SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd Researcher Days Espoo 1.6.2015

Upload: others

Post on 18-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

SCELETON FRAMEWORK

AND SOME RESULTS

13.3.2015Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne

Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd Researcher DaysEspoo 1.6.2015

Page 2: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

Contents

• Sceleton energy modelling framework (Juha & Jussi)

• Exploring PV and storage investments (Juha)

Page 3: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

P2G, P2XJussi Ikäheimo

P2G, P2XJussi Ikäheimo

Long term generalized storage StoSSch

Erkka Rinne

Improved district heatingJussi Ikäheimo

Frequency responseMiguel Azevedo

Interface and framework developmentPekka Savolainen

ScenariosGeographic scopeMiguel Azevedo & Jussi Ikäheimo

Page 4: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

Intra-day stages

Day-ahead stages

time

Settlement period(1 hour)

Wilmar optimizes plant scheduling 36 hours ahead with rolling horizon

Page 5: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

Problem: large seasonal hydropower reservoirs and other long-term storages

Stored energy has value well beyond the model horizon

How to control the use of storages?How to take uncertain future into account?

Page 6: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

• Problems:• Changed generation fleet?• Changed climate?• Does not give

comparable marketprices

Old solution: Try to follow historical reservoir levels.

maximum

Re

se

rvo

ir c

on

ten

t

t i m eJan

Use less hydropowerIf below reference path

Use more hydropowerIf above reference path

Dec

referencepath

Page 7: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

• Finds cost-optimal generation schedule for the next 365 days• Based on stochastic wind power feed-in and hydropower inflow

(currently 22 historical scenarios)Storage charging/discharging decisions minimise expected costs (in all scenarios)

• Finds Storage values (€/MWh): How much less (€) would the generation schedule cost if there were on unit (MWh) more storage energy available?

Stochastic Storage Scheduler (StoSSch)

Page 8: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

WILMAR JMM & StoSSch

Wilmar JMM StoSSch

every day (12:00):– power system data– current storage levels

historical scenarios

storage values

realisation of inflow, wind, solar power

Page 9: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd
Page 10: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd
Page 11: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd
Page 12: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd
Page 13: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

Balmorel

• Generation planning model, LP optimization

• Three weeks with hourly+ time steps

Page 14: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

10/02/2016 14

Background for PV and storage investments

A comparison of flexibility from different sources Including batteries

Impact of flexibility on the ’optimal’ share of wind power/PVNordic+Baltic+Germany+Poland

Lot of reservoir hydro powerLow solar resource

Long term futureGeneration planning + unit commitment and dispatch

Page 15: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

10/02/2016 15

Type Fuel

Eff. at full

outputInv. Cost,

€/kW/ year

Fixed cost, €/

kW/year

Variable cost,

€/MWhEngine/GT Nat. gas 40 % 700 17 1.21ST cond. Coal 46 % 1500 36 1.45ST cond. inno Coal 50 % 1875 36 1.45CC cond. Nat. gas 60 % 1250 28 0.67Nuclear U235 33 % 4760 97 1.21ST CHP Coal 50 % 2275 55 1.61CC CHP Nat. gas 64 % 1500 40 0.67Heat boiler Fuel oil 95 % 105 4 1Heat boiler Nat. gas 95 % 100 4 0.67Heat boiler Wood 85 % 400 19 2.7Heat boiler Elec. 98 % 60 1 0.5Boiler + grid Elec. 98 % 190 1 0.5Heat pump Elec. 300 % 575 4 0PHP - 100 % 329 9Battery Elec. 100 % 50-150 2Wind turbine - 100 % 950-1600 36PV - 100 % 25-1394 10

Page 16: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

10/02/2016 16

Shorthand DescriptionBase No flexibility optionsBattery Li-ion battery at 50–150 €/MWhPHP Pumped hydro power in South Norway, 6094 MWTrans. Max. 1400 MW between each regionTrans. unlim. Unlimited transmission investmentsDem. resp. Price sensitive demand responseFlex. Lower minimum load in conventional power plantsElec. boil. Electric boilers in district heatingHeat stor. Heat storage in district heatingHeat pump Heat pumps in district heatingEB+HP+HS Elec. boil. + heat stor. + heat pumpAll All flexibility options (trans. max. 1400, battery 100

€/MWh)Batteries 1 MWh 1 MW

Wind capacity factor: 30.8 – 42.8 %PV capacity factor: 9.5 – 10.1 %

Page 17: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

10/02/2016 17

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Aver

age

cost

of w

ind

pow

er (€

/MW

h)

Share of wind power of total electricity production

BaseBattery 50 €/MWhEB+HS+HPTrans unlim.All

Page 18: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

10/02/2016 18

PV

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

400350300250200150100 50

Shar

e in

ele

c. g

ener

atio

n

Cost of PV €/kW

All flex.Bat. 50 €/MWhBat. 100 €/MWhBat. 150 €/MWhBase

Page 19: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

10/02/2016 19

Wind power

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

400350300250200150100 50

Shar

e in

ele

c. g

ener

atio

n

Cost of PV €/kW

All flex.Bat. 50 €/MWhBat. 100 €/MWhBat. 150 €/MWhBase

Page 20: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

10/02/2016 20

PV + Wind power

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

400350300250200150100 50

Shar

e in

ele

c. g

ener

atio

n

Cost of PV €/kW

All flex.Bat. 50 €/MWhBat. 100 €/MWhBat. 150 €/MWhBase

Page 21: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

10/02/2016 21

Cost of PV€/MW

Sha

re in

ele

ctric

ity p

rodu

ctio

n

Page 22: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

10/02/2016 22

Winter week

020406080

100120140160180200

BatteryPVWindDemand

GW

Page 23: SCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTSSCELETON FRAMEWORK AND SOME RESULTS 13.3.2015 Juha Kiviluoma, Jussi Ikäheimo, Pekka Savolainen, Miguel Azevedo, Erkka Rinne Neo-Carbon Energy 3rd

10/02/2016 23

Summer week

020406080

100120140160180200

BatteryPVWindDemand

GW