scandinavian tobacco v. imperial

Upload: frank-herrera

Post on 04-Jun-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    1/18

    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov

    ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA580629

    Filing date: 01/08/2014

    IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

    BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

    Notice of Opposition

    Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.

    Opposer Information

    Name Scandinavian Tobacco Group Lane Ltd.

    Entity Corporation Citizenship New York

    Address 2280 Mountain Industrial BoulevardTucker, GA 30084UNITED STATES

    Correspondenceinformation

    Janet F. SatterthwaiteVenable LLPPO Box 34385Washington, DC 20043-4385UNITED [email protected],[email protected],[email protected] Phone:202-344-4974

    Applicant Information

    Application No 85898370 Publication date 12/17/2013

    Opposition FilingDate

    01/08/2014 OppositionPeriod Ends

    01/16/2014

    InternationalRegistration No.

    NONE InternationalRegistration Date

    NONE

    Applicant Imperial Tobacco LimitedP.O. Box 244, Upton RoadBristol, GBX BS997UJGBX

    Goods/Services Affected by Opposition

    Class 034. First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Tobacco whether manufactured orunmanufactured; tobacco products, namely, smoking tobacco and cigarillos; tobacco substitutes,none being for medicinal or curative purposes; hand rolling tobacco; cigarettes; cigarette papers;cigarette tubes; cigarette filters; pocket cigarette rolling machines; hand held machines forinjectingtobacco into paper tubes; smokers' articles, namely, lighters, cigarette cases, tobacco pouches and

    tobacco tins; matches

    Grounds for Opposition

    Priority and likelihood of confusion Trademark Act section 2(d)

    Torres v. Cantine Torresella S.r.l.Fraud 808 F.2d 46, 1 USPQ2d 1483 (Fed. Cir. 1986)

    Other improper priority claim under Section 44

    Marks Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    2/18

    U.S. ApplicationNo.

    85836728 Application Date 01/30/2013

    Registration Date NONE Foreign PriorityDate

    NONE

    Word Mark GOLDEN VIRGINIA

    Design Mark

    Description ofMark

    NONE

    Goods/Services Class 034. First use: First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0

    cigarette tobacco

    U.S. ApplicationNo.

    85836713 Application Date 01/30/2013

    Registration Date NONE Foreign PriorityDate

    NONE

    Word Mark VIRGINIA GOLD

    Design Mark

    Description ofMark

    NONE

    Goods/Services Class 034. First use: First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0

    pipe tobacco

    Attachments 85836728#TMSN.jpeg( bytes )85836713#TMSN.jpeg( bytes )NOTICE OF OPPOSITION GOLDEN VIRGINIA.pdf(47616 bytes )EXH A TO NOTICE OF OPPOSITION.pdf(875095 bytes )

    Certificate of Service

    The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this paper has been served upon all parties, at their address

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    3/18

    record by First Class Mail on this date.

    Signature /Janet F. Satterthwaite/

    Name Janet F. Satterthwaite

    Date 01/08/2014

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    4/18

    BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

    IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

    ___________________________________)

    Scandinavian Tobacco Group Lane Ltd

    ))

    Opposer, )

    )

    v. ) Opposition No._________

    )

    ) Serial No: 85898370

    )

    ) Mark: GOLDEN VIRGINIA and Design

    )

    Imperial Tobacco Limited )Applicant. )

    ____________________________________)

    Atty Ref. No.: 39240-358502

    BOX: TTAB FEE

    NOTICE OF OPPOSITION

    In the matter of the applications for registration of the trademark GOLDEN VIRGINIA

    and Design, of Imperial Tobacco Limited, (Applicant,) Application Serial No. 85898370,

    filed on April 8, 2013, and published for opposition in the Official Gazette on December 17,

    2013, Opposer, Scandinavian Tobacco Group Lane Ltd., a New York Corporation, (Lane)

    believes that it will be damaged by registration of the mark shown in said Application and hereby

    oppose the same.

    As grounds in support of this opposition, Lane asserts the following:

    1. Lane manufactures and sells a variety of pipe tobacco, fine-cut tobacco, and little

    cigars.

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    5/18-2-

    2. Lane is a subsidiary of Scandinavian Tobacco Group A/S. Scandinavian Tobacco

    Group is the largest manufacturer of cigars in the world, the worlds largest in pipe tobacco and a

    strong regional player in fine-cut tobacco in Scandinavia and in the United States.

    3. Lanes predecessor in interest, Lane Limited, was the owner of U.S. Registration

    747146 for GOLDEN VIRGINIA for smoking tobacco. The registration set forth a first-use

    date of 1940.

    4. Registration No. 747146 was cancelled as a result of a default judgment in an inter

    partesCancellation action, effective January 3, 2013.

    5. Lane used the mark GOLDEN VIRGINIA in the United States for many years prior

    to the earliest possible date upon which Applicant may rely. The mark was long associated with

    Lanes goods.

    6. On January 30, 2013, Lane filed a new application for GOLDEN VIRGINIA for

    cigarette tobacco Serial No. 85836728.

    7. On January 30, 2013, Lane also filed a new application for VIRGINIA GOLD for

    pipe tobacco, Serial No. 85836713. Serial Nos. 85836728 and 8536713 are referred to

    collectively as Lanes Applications.

    8. On April 8, 2013, over three months after the filing date of Lanes Applications,

    Applicant filed the subject application for .

    9. The Subject Application covers Tobacco whether manufactured or unmanufactured;

    tobacco products, namely, smoking tobacco and cigarillos; tobacco substitutes, none being for

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    6/18-3-

    medicinal or curative purposes; hand rolling tobacco; cigarettes; cigarette papers; cigarette tubes;

    cigarette filters; pocket cigarette rolling machines; hand held machines for injecting tobacco into

    paper tubes; smokers' articles, namely, lighters, cigarette cases, tobacco pouches and tobacco

    tins; matches.

    10. These goods are highly related to Lanes goods.

    11. On information and belief, Applicant did not use its mark before April 8, 2013.

    IMPROPER PRIORITY CLAIM

    12. Applicant included a priority claim of December 24, 2012, under Section 44 of the

    Trademark Act based on a Community trademark (CTM) application, 011453156.

    13. Because this priority claim appeared to give Applicant priority of Lanes

    Applications, the Subject application has been cited against Lanes Applications.

    14. The priority claim, however, was improper.

    15. Lane is damaged by the improper priority claim because Lanes applications

    would otherwise be the first filed, and the subject application would not pose a bar to use and

    registration of Lanes marks.

    16. A priority claim under Section 44 may only be made when the application upon

    which the priority claim is based is the first filed anywhere in the world.

    17. Applicant has filed numerous long-prior applications around the world for the

    word mark GOLDEN VIRGINIA.

    18. For example, Applicant owns CTM registration 4,392,023, for the word mark

    GOLDEN VIRGINIA, which was filed in 2005 and registered in 2006, for the following goods:

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    7/18

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    8/18-5-

    22. If the priority claim were to extend only to the design element, then the subject

    application would no longer pose a bar to Lanes Applications.

    BAD FAITH-FRAUD ON THE TRADEMARK OFFICE

    23. On information and belief, Applicant was well aware of Lanes longtime

    ownership and use of the mark GOLDEN VIRGINIA in the United States.

    24. On information and belief, it was not a coincidence that Applicant filed a new CTM

    application after the cancellation of Registration 747146.

    25. On information and belief, Applicants CTM application, and the filing of the subject

    application, was done in bad faith with respect to Lanes reputation and residual goodwill with

    respect to its longtime GOLDEN VIRGINIA mark.

    LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSIONFALSE ASSOCIATION OR SPONSORSHIP

    26. On information and belief, consumers will be confused because of residual goodwill

    derived of Lanes longtime use of its mark, as to the association or sponsorship of Lane with

    Applicant.

    27. For example, many state regulatory offices continue to carry Lanes GOLDEN

    VIRGINIA brand on their rosters of approved tobacco brands.

    28. Lane will be injured if the subject application is registered because the mark that

    is the subject of the application is so similar to the residual goodwill of Lanes GOLDEN

    VIRGINIA brand as to be likely to cause confusion as to the source or sponsorship by Lane of

    Applicants goods.

    29. Lane is likewise injured because the subject application is interfering with the

    registration of Lanes Applications, and may interfere with Lanes use of same.

    Please deduct the opposition fees from Deposit Account 22-0261.

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    9/18-6-

    Please address correspondence to Janet F. Satterthwaite of Venable, LLP, P.O. Box

    34385, Washington, D.C. 20045-9998.

    Respectfully submitted,

    Scandinavian Tobacco Group Lane Limited

    Dated: January 8, 2014 By:

    Janet F. SatterthwaiteVENABLE LLPP.O. Box 34385Washington, D.C. 20043-9998

    Phone: (202) 344-4000

    Fax: (202) 344-8300

    Email: [email protected]

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    10/18-7-

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 8th day of January, 2014, I caused a copy of theforegoing Notice of Opposition to be served by first class mail to Applicants counsel:

    MARTIN R. GREENSTEIN

    TECHMARK A LAW CORPORATION4820 HARWOOD RD, 2ND FLOOR

    SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95124-5200

    ____________________________

    Janet F. Satterthwaite

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    11/18

    F?@D NGO >JA 0BOFDJO 9BDFOPN>PFKJ 7CCF@B KC PEB 1QNKLB>J =JFKJ

    P^d QaU XUaU4?^\U6 HdQ[Ych _[db6 ;QcQRQbUb

    /FHBA PN>ABI>NG FJCKNI>PFKJ

    FeUaeYUf

    KaQTU \QaZ

    >aQ_XYS aU_aUbU]cQcY ]

    CYbc ^V W^^Tb Q]T bUaeYSUb

    ;UbSaY_cY^] ^V cXU \QaZ

    Ff]Ua

    IU_aUbU]cQcYeU

    JU]Y^aYch

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    12/18

    -AANBOO+ + Jc 7dWdbcY]U"b G[QSU8KOP @KAB+ 8J+ .L;AANBOO+ JKPB KC LQ?HF@>PFKJ+ +*)+*),**/8>NP+ 7(+

    .QHHBPFJ JK"+ &$$*#$%(0>PB KC LQ?HF@>PFKJ+ *-)*.),**0

    48=; & D< '3+1/!320/2. ! ,61!320/2. ! -;I8 A;9 IG89; B8G@ C

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    13/18

    8>NP+ 8(+

    .QHHBPFJ JK"+ &$%&%'0>PB KC LQ?HF@>PFKJ+ *2)++),*+,8>NP+ 9(2(+

    .QHHBPFJ JK"+ &$%'#$)'0>PB KC LQ?HF@>PFKJ+ +/)*-),*+-8>NP+ 9(+(-

    +??>A8B8>=

    E^ U]cah V^a Q__[YSQcY^] ]d\RUa4 **.-3,*,-(

    #0=24;;0B8>=

    E^ U]cah V^a Q__[YSQcY^] ]d\RUa4 **.-3,*,-

    "??40;A

    E^ U]cah V^a Q__[YSQcY^] ]d\RUa4 **.-3,*,-(

    -42>@30;A

    PB KC LQ?HF@>PFKJ+ +/)*-),*+-8>NP+ 9(+(-

    -4=4E0;A

    E^ U]cah V^a Q__[YSQcY^] ]d\RUa4 **.-3,*,-(

    j j j j

    MUabY^]4 3(.(1 k +33/',*+*

    FVVYSU V^a ?Qa\^]YiQcY^] Y] cXU @]cUa]Q[ DQaZUc #KaQTU DQaZb Q]T ;UbYW]b$

    7eU]YTQ TU

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    14/18

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    15/18nm sspqorsrq

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    16/18

    +@H;B8@C=G(

    5I8IJH(

    ISUW`a_OaW\[ \T aVW` ZO_X `VOYY UWcS [\_WUVa a\ aVS SeQYb`WcS b`S \T aVS d\_R

    !MW_UW[WO!(

    ISUW`aS_SR

    JS[W\_Waf QYOWZSR T\_ 9\ZZb[Waf

    K_ORS ZO_XFC;@E@7

    6G8

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    17/18

    >bORSY\b]S& @[RWO& @`_OSY& @c\_f 9\O`a&

    DO_aW[W^bS& DOb_WaWb`& ESd NSOYO[R&EWUS_WO& FZO[& GOXW`aO[& GO_OUbOf&HbOaO_& JSfQVSYYS`& JW[UO]\_S& J_W

    CO[XO& Ja( DO_aW[ $=_S[QV%& Ja( DO_aW[$;baQV%& KOWdO[& KVOWYO[R& K\U\&

    K_W[WROR& Kb_XSf O[R NWZPOPdS(

    2LD=G!H" D8C=( @Z]S_WOY K\POQQ\ CWZWaSR

    GF 8\e ,..& J\baVcWYYS& 8_W`a\Y& 8J221LA& L[WaSR BW[UR\Z

    MWSd \d[S_#` \aVS_ a_ORS ZO_X`

    -32 G=FG=H=DI8I@K= D8C=( JaScS[`& ?SdYSaa " GS_XW[`

    + Ja 7bUb`aW[S#` GYOQS&& 8_W`a\Y& L[WaSR

    BW[UR\Z& 8J+ .L;

    ,@GHI 8

  • 8/13/2019 Scandinavian Tobacco v. Imperial

    18/18

    7I9=> 39IC +>K9BDJ

    7I9=> 39IC ( $&&'&%&

    .GG=J ! 6>IMBJ

    *D9JJ( %& ASGFHHS" [MJXMJV QFRYKFHXYVJI SV YRQFRYKFHXYVJI. XSGFHHS TVSIYHXW. XSGFHHSWYGWXNXYXJW. RSRJ GJNRL KSV QJINHNRFP SV HYVFXNZJ TYVTSWJW. HNLFVJXXJW. MFRI#VSPPNRL XSGFHHS.

    QFXHMJW FRI WQSOJVW! FVXNHPJW

    8GI=( 5=923< C6?56(

    2G=@>E>FK +9K>(&,#@3>#(&''

    )( (,#7B