same 2012 sa/sc joint engineer training symposium october 2-4, 2012

32
Keith D. Hodsden, Sr., P.E. Client Service Manager GIS & Hydraulic Modeling for Water / Sewer Asset Management and Rehabilitation Planning SAME 2012 SA/SC Joint Engineer Training Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Upload: amiel

Post on 23-Feb-2016

47 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

SAME 2012 SA/SC Joint Engineer Training Symposium October 2-4, 2012 . GIS & Hydraulic Modeling for Water / Sewer Asset Management and Rehabilitation Planning. Keith D. Hodsden, Sr., P.E. Client Service Manager. Innovyze Oveview. Subsidiary of MWH Global - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Keith D. Hodsden, Sr., P.E.Client Service Manager

GIS & Hydraulic Modeling for Water / Sewer Asset Management and Rehabilitation Planning

SAME2012 SA/SC Joint Engineer Training Symposium

October 2-4, 2012

Page 2: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Subsidiary of MWH Global

MWH Soft / Wallingford Software Merger

Company Renamed in March 2011 Same Market Leading Products, Services, Support

Corporate HQ: Denver, CO

Operations HQ: Pasadena, CA

Global offices with local focus

US Offices in Every Time Zone

Experienced software support

Innovyze Oveview

Page 3: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

US Infrastructure Situation Aging Infrastructure Infrastructure design life is 50 to 80 yrs Out of sight = out of mind EPA: $170 to 493 Billion in next 20 years* Congressional Budget Office: $245 to $424 Billion* Water Infrastructure Network: $420 Billion* Limited funds = need to prioritize Military bases arguably worse “Ostrich” Consideration* EPA 816-R-05-001 Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey & Assessment – 3rd Report to Congress, June 2005

Page 4: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Current Situation* 2009 – WSSC had 1,847 water breaks

• 611 breaks in January 2009

240,000 water main breaks/year in USA

Large utility breaks in the Midwest increased from 250/yr to 2,200/yr over 19 years

Baltimore, MD had 1,190 main breaks in 2003 • more than 3 per day

British study in 2005 correlated diarrhea with low water pressure events (including main breaks)

USGS estimates 1.7 trillion gallons of water lost in the US per year, at a cost of $2.6 Billion

* EPA Aging Water Infrastructure Research Program: EPA/600/F-07/015, September, 2007

Page 5: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Historical Infrastructure Needs

Page 6: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Sample Deterioration Curve

Pipes do not deteriorate at a constant rateVariables:• Material• Soil condition• Wrapping/Lining• External Loading• Excavation Activity• Corrosion Protection• Pipe Depth• Pipe Pressure• …

Page 7: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

What Has Been Done?

Engineering firms develop one-off, proprietary solutions (excel, access, GIS, etc.)

Difficult for clients to use / limited training

No upgrade path

No $$ vehicle for updates

Original author(s) may leave, be promoted, or otherwise unavailable

Page 8: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Asset and Data Management

Page 9: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Asset Management & Rehabilitation Planning

Page 10: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

CapPlan Water Overview Risk-based capital planning tool for water

distribution systems

Incorporates hydraulic model, GIS, CMMS data in one platform for analysis

Allows for proactive capital plans

Builds an asset management model

Page 11: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Risk-Based Planning Represents a New Focus for Most Utilities

Historical Approach to Renewal Planning

•Budget Based on Last Year•Little knowledge of system risks

Backward Looking

•Projects determined as problems arise during the year

Reactive

•Do as many projects as you can afford each year

Budget Constrained

•Money is spent but overall risk may not have been reduced much

Ignores asset and

system risks

Risk-Based Renewal Planning

•Based on asset risk scores throughout system and long term forecasts of risk and cost

Forward Looking

•High risk assets slotted for renewal before failure occurs

Proactive

•Budget could be determined based on agreed risk targets for system

Risk or Budget

Constrained

•High risk assets addressed first•Budget may rise or fall to meet risk targets

Focused on risk

management

Page 12: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Likelihood of Failure

Hydraulic Model •Pressure Changes•Roughness

Infrastructure Data •Age•Material

GIS Data •Soil Type•Railroads/Fault Lines

CMMS & Work Orders

•Break History•Repairs/Lining

Consequence of Failure

• Pipe/Valve Criticality• Flow Delivered

Hydraulic Model

• Hospitals, Schools, etc• Power, Industry, etc.

Critical Facilities

• Population Density• Street Paving GIS Data

• Traffic Analysis• Community Relations Other

Rehabilitation Engine

Budget ScenariosRehabilitation Costs

Prioritized Capital Plan

Calculation of Risk

Multiple Calculation

Options

CapPlan Work Flow Diagram

Page 13: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Likelihood of FailureW1L1

P1+W2L2 P2+…+WmLm

Pm

• Hydraulic Condition (Pressure, Flow, & Velocity)• Infrastructure/Asset Data (Age, Material, Dia.)• Soil Characteristics• Seismic Faults• Railroad Intersection• Traffic• Defect History• Joint Type• Others

Page 14: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Consequence of FailureW1C1

P1+W2C2 P2+…+WmCm

Pm

• Flow (Demand) Supplied• Population Density Served• Critical Facilities Served• Outage/Isolation Analysis• Traffic• Others

Page 15: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Outage/Isolation Analysis

Evaluate each pipe

Page 16: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Outage/Isolation Analysis

Evaluate each pipe ID u/s pipes/valves

Page 17: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Outage/Isolation Analysis

Evaluate each pipe ID u/s pipes/valves ID d/s pipes/valves

Page 18: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Outage/Isolation Analysis

Evaluate each pipe ID u/s valves ID d/s valves Remove elements

Page 19: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

No Water Pressure

Low Water Pressure

Outage/Isolation Analysis

Evaluate each pipe ID u/s valves ID d/s valves Remove elements Find pressure

problems

Page 20: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Outage/Isolation Analysis

Evaluate each pipe ID u/s valves ID d/s valves Remove elements Find pressure

problems Evaluate fire flow

Page 21: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Flexible Risk Classification

Page 22: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Calculate Risk

Risk Rating = Likelihood x Consequence

Renewal Condition Score (Probability of Failure)

1Neg

2 Low

3 Med

4

High

5

Extreme

Consequence of Failure

Score (criticality)

C = 1 Low

Impact

B = 2

Medium Impact

A = 3 High Impact

• Linear (Likelihood X Consequence)

•Bi-directional matrix

•Multi-criterion classification

 • Likelihood X Consequence is

normalized between 0 and 1.

• For each consequence definition, lower and upper boundaries can be set to define Low, Medium and High risk.

Page 23: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Each Asset Mapped to Risk Matrix

Page 24: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012
Page 25: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

• Define Rehabilitation Costs

•Define Rehabilitation Actions

•Establish Phasing & Budget

•View Reports or Maps

Rehab Costing and Phasing

Page 26: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012
Page 27: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012
Page 28: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Energy Optimization & Sustainability

Page 29: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Energy ManagementCalculating/Projecting Pump Energy Use

Determine total pumping costs based on actual energy cost charges

Calculate energy cost for operating pumps under various

demand conditions

Page 30: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Pump SchedulerOptimal Pump Scheduling

Optimize pump scheduling to minimize energy cost

Set constraints for system pressure, tank level, pipe velocity, water age, etc

Page 31: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

SustainabilityReduce Power Costs & Carbon Footprint

Quickly determine carbon footprint and total energy losses

across entire water system

Visualize specific pipes, pumps, valves, and taps with the highest carbon

footprint

Page 32: SAME 2012  SA/SC Joint Engineer Training  Symposium October 2-4, 2012

Questions…

Keith [email protected]

(802) 758-2109