sagging line mitigator (slim) status & future

12
1 Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM) Status & Future IEEE Winter Technical Meeting TPC/ESMOL Joint Meeting Las Vegas, NV January 28, 2003 Material Integrity Solutions, Inc. Problem Statement b More than 50% of lines in WSCC region are 230kV ACSR lines: ~37,500 miles. b These lines are typically thermally limited. b Survey results: Sag problems are of most concern on 115-230kV lines. Most sag problems are due to high load demand on hot days. The majority of sag problems are under 5 feet of excessive sag.

Upload: others

Post on 02-Apr-2022

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM) Status & Future

1

Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM)

Status & Future

IEEE Winter Technical MeetingTPC/ESMOL Joint Meeting

Las Vegas, NVJanuary 28, 2003

MaterialIntegritySolutions, Inc.

Problem Statement

b More than 50% of lines in WSCC region are230kV ACSR lines: ~37,500 miles.

b These lines are typically thermally limited.b Survey results:

• Sag problems are of most concern on 115-230kVlines.

• Most sag problems are due to high load demand onhot days.

• The majority of sag problems are under 5 feet ofexcessive sag.

Page 2: Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM) Status & Future

2

Alternative Solutions

Current Methods:• Limit Line Ampacity• Raise Tower Height• Reduce Tower Spacing• Re-conductor• Construct new/parallel lines

or... Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM)!

SLiM Philosophy

A small decrease in conductor length equals alarge decrease in sag.

Page 3: Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM) Status & Future

3

Our Goal

To design, construct, demonstrate, andcommercialize a device which keeps thesag in power transmission lines almost

constant by automatically compensatingfor temperature and loading changes.

Criteria, Targets, Standards

b Meets Codes & Standardsb Uses common rules & practicesb Performance Criteria

– Mitigate additional sag that occurs in conductorsheated from 110°F to 212°F

– Voltage range 230kV– Up to 6” range of motion– Up to 5000 lbs. working line tension– Mechanical failure > 35,000 lbs.

Page 4: Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM) Status & Future

4

Criteria, Targets, Standards

b Functionality Criteria– Corrosion resistant– Low E-field for corona– Negligible impact on stability– Negligible impact on line vibration– Emergency Constraints

b Cost Targets - less expensive than otheralternatives, e.g. raising towers

Current Designs & Prototype

Page 5: Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM) Status & Future

5

General Specifications

How SLiM Works

b A portion of line currentpasses through SMAactuator.

b Actuator shortens whenheated.

b Lever arm magnifies actuatormotion.

b Line tension extendsactuator when cool.

Page 6: Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM) Status & Future

6

Modeling

Corona Behavior Stress-Strain

Modeling

36.6mH

50k

close at t=5ms

100 close at t=0

SLiM

1.6H

100kv

104.5kmSRCA SWA

SRA

ENDASENDA SENDB

104.5km ENDB

Electromagnetic Transients

750'

Case #2

Case #3

Effect on Line Vibration

Page 7: Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM) Status & Future

7

Modeling

Percentage Sag Reduced vs Number of Slim Devices in Rail 10 600'-Spans Transmission Line

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Number of Slim Devices

Cap

acity

for

Sag

Red

uctio

n

Effect on SLiM on continuous lines

SmartConductor - SLiM’s Partner

b Length of conductor that shortens when heated due to SMA core.

b Lower cost alternative to SLiM.

b ~30% of the range of motion of SLiM.

b Assembled rather than fabricated.

Page 8: Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM) Status & Future

8

Small Scale Prototype Testing

Full-Scale Functionality Testing

Page 9: Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM) Status & Future

9

Functionality Testing

Functionality Testing

SmartConductorControl Span Test Span

Measured Tension Height* Change in Sag Tension Height* Change in Sag Sag Differential(lbs.) (in) (in) (lbs.) (in) (in) (in)

Cold 2917 98.6 — 2925 97.5 — —Hot 2073 41.5 57.1 2202 50 47.5 9.6Predicted Tension Sag Change in Sag Tension Sag Change in Sag Sag Differential

(lbs.) (in) (in) (lbs.) (in) (in) (in)Cold 2917 135 — 2925 135 — —Hot 2152 184 48.9 2274 174 39.1 9.8* Height from ground at midspan.

SLiMControl Span Test Span

Measured Tension Height* Change in Sag Tension Height* Change in Sag Sag Differential(lbs.) (in) (in) (lbs.) (in) (in) (in)

Cold 4731 152 — 4808 151 — —Hot 2685 87.4 65.0 3747 130 21.0 44.0Predicted Tension Sag Change in Sag Tension Sag Change in Sag Sag Differential

(lbs.) (in) (in) (lbs.) (in) (in) (in)Cold 4731 81.5 — 4808 80.2 — —Hot 2980 130 48.2 4699 82 1.8 46.4

Page 10: Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM) Status & Future

10

Benefits

b Improve line reliability and safetyb Reduce cost of new line constructionb Delay new line construction

• Save $$• Realize environmental benefits

b Increase line ampacity• Additional transfer capability to areas short of

supplyb Part of an overall solution to the current energy

crisis

Current Status

b Issue final reportb EPRI’s Tailored Collaboration Project to

Install/Demonstrate on T-Lines:• Opportunity Sheet Issued (available)• 10 Utilities sought for 3 installations

– 5 signups already (BCH, NG-UK, CEC for PG&E, SCE &SDG&E) and three more about to sign (?).

• Fore more info. or to sign up, please contact Dr.Ram Adapa (EPRI) at:

(650) 855-8988 or [email protected]

Page 11: Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM) Status & Future

11

Future

b Production Models& Standard Testing

b Commercialization• Utilities• Manufacturers• VC’s, ???

b Sale/Support

Our Team / Acknowledgements

b Research Sponsor

b Research/Advisory Participants• IREQ, SPEC, PTC, APS, AEP, BCH, EPRI,

CAISO, …

Page 12: Sagging Line Mitigator (SLiM) Status & Future

12

Questions?