31C15NW8831 2 .IH27 CLARENDON 010

NTS: --lC, l

KEFOKT ON THE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYSUt

THE JAMES CLAIM GhGUF

F ri r. r M.K.t.L'; r UK :

H'..'M r. -- I A K i. MINhr.rtL L'1 E v E i, (J r ;-Jt: it-t :, : - i ./r-j BUHr:AKJ SI'KtrTVAiv .. , : i- ; v th , ohlljSH '..X'LliI-Jfci A

RECEIVEDJUU25 1988

MINING LANDS SECTION

i-i r' . r'A Kh.i-i j v 1 h ASSi t-j AIij

SE.-.'iv-K 'J Lv r'H :'' S I -".^riuMt.Sj.AKh

J UN r.' 10, i

. I ECHiJi -J j. AJV i'h' V tLuFHiiN'j.' CuMrAhi

SUMMARY:

Homestake Mineral Development Company is the holder ci b mineral ciaims covering approximately 16u nectares of ground in Clarendon Township, trontenac County, untario.

Magnetometer and V . L . t . surveys nave confirmed the presence of long, linear, weak conductive zones which parallel the local structui trends. As well minor ooiique cross cutting conductors were detected in the vicinity and to the east ot the old shafts .

Ifit: ma,T or poweriine wnicn crosses tne most important section of the property has caused the loss of valuable mi 01 n.at ion aue tc 1 h i t; h bacKtround noise in octn t ne magnetometer ana V. ^. f , surveys,

It is recommended that iurthei V . L. i-. be cai J leo out both noith aria s-C'Utn of tne power^ine to tne east of tne -Md snaf ts . Such a survey could be accompj. j siieo as v. j rite: uc-j k on a small ja 3 c; covering the swamps in tnis reeion. Keadin.es wi^uid be to*:en every iu meters using static.ri NLK : t^at t i e,' ar^o at evejy j i.-L- lueter i3'jtei'Voj.s vjiti'i x/je station i^'..:' . Annac':. j. is , . Ine latter v ^a- dints wraij.a i'lei r- detect cJ'.-.ss cutting Miuituies.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGEUMMARY

I. INTRODUCTIONScope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lLocation and Access . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . lProperty Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . }Logistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ^Physiography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . oPrevious. Geo-Ocicai i-,1 o r i'. . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . t*

he, 7 iona.; Gei-j o* yProper t v ^e : ^ -^v

111. GE'Ur ri ''i S j. CSGeophysical Survev Metnoos. . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11Geopnysi z a j. t u r ve y Ana.!. vsis . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , .12

.

REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lc-

A P PEN t' i,-.- l HAPS

APPEND! .\ - 2 GEL.pH'i 3-i CAL-GEuLuGiCAL- GRv-CHr.H] CAL IPCPNItAL DATA STAThMEN'i

FIGURES

1. Map showing tne location of the James Claim Group,Clarendon Township, Prontenac County, Ontario. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2. Detailed claim map of tne James Property,Clarendon lownsnip, Pi ontenac uounty, Ontario. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ^

3 . Regioiial geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y

TABLES

l . Summary ea' mining ciaims in the James Claim Group. . . . . . , . . . b

MAPS

l . James v . L . r . compiiati on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . Append i/: i2. James Total Kiej.a Magnetics;. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Appendix l3. James East v'. L . i-" . C'C'iiiiMiatiC'Ti. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Appendix J4. James East Total i-1 e j. a Magnetics.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Appeiioi:-: j

1. INTRODUCTION

SCOPE

This report summarizes the results of detailed Geonics KM-1 (r V.L. F. and Scintrex MP-2 Magnetometer surveys. Tnese surveys coverea the James claim group, Clarendon Township, Fiontenac County, Ontario.

The main purpose of tnese two surveys was to detect possible gold bearing sulphide deposits, and cross cutting structures in the vicinity of tne old abandoned shafts.

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The James Property is locateo in the north centra]portion 01 Ciarenoon 'iownsnip. Frontenac County, Ontario (Figure l;. Trie property it situated vO km. northeast o l belleville ifiguie l), which is approximately 20u Kin. east of Toronto.

Geori aphic au y tne centre ci the property it locatec a* latitude M^ 0 h/' j i." k and longitude 76 0 5^' i. at an ayer age elevation of -7S meters. 'i he maf.nel.3c aeciina.tion i or the area, j s approximate.!. 1.' iu.S* west . Tne claims are covered by 1:50,000 series map sheet 31 c/'2 b .

J he Claims are locateo aj.cni\ an unta! ic^ t'lyoi c j pC'wej' tr ansmi t-si on i j ne. jn^v ..arj n-^ r^^crieci C'y car via Hi^nway ::-oo . ^i km. north from tne Ar-Jocn turn:-j : . n g j aveJ hvaro access r c a o. which exit; tije i crest at line o-i-ou, snouj.ci ti'iei'i C'e foj.j.oweo.

PROPERTY OWNERSHIP

The James Property - - nfc'iits o: eight nonejaJ ci&iiis covering a surface area of approximately 162 hectares or ^00 acres i Figure 2 ). Details regarding these eight mineral claims are summarized in Table l. These claims are wnoiiy owned by Homestake Mineral Development Company, Suite 6^0, I s&O Burraro Street, Vancouver, British Coiumoia, V6Z-2H2.

LOGISTICS

Geological mapping of t he property was conducted by V.j.N. Bulman and B.J. Christie. The section on geology within tnis report has been reproduced in whole from "Report on Geological and Geocheniicc-i Surveys of the James Claim Group" by B.J. Christie. The author tham;s him for permission of such.

Geophysical surveys of the property were carried out by Shaun P. Parent. Joanne Murphy-Parent, Allan Henry, and Bonita Lawrence. Both surveys were completed on an 100 meter grid with survey station picKets located at 20 meter intervals.

50 ka

Figure 1. Map showing the location of the James Claim Group, Clarendon township, Frontenac County, Ontario (. A Property location).

2 km

Figure- 2. Detailed claim map of the James Property, Clarendon township, Ontario (the claims are outlined in red).

TABLE l. Summary of Mining Claims in the James Claim Group

Claim No

840011840012840013 6400lA 862457 862459 840342 84u:-'.43.

AnniversaryDate

(Recording Date)

June June June June July July July

l b.18, 18, 10, 10 , 30 : 10 ,

1985 1985 1985 lyb5 1985 1985 1985

AssessmentCreditsto date(Days)

.9595 95 y5

l Ob . 10&. 106. l O C- . 106.95 106.95 i U i .25 101.15

Total Assessment Credits Required to l988 Anniversary Date

(Days)

100100100100100100100100

l PHYSIOGRAPHY

Tne area ci the claims- is- comprised of moderate reid el ana in some instances steep slopes. Tnese niliocKs run in an northeasterly direction and are separated by small nai row valleys. In some cases small intermittent streams are found in these low areas.

Ground cover consists of mostly maple forests rooteo on gravelly tills composed of well rounded coooies , witn the occasional boulder present, in areas of low relief the principle vegetation is cedar ana aider thicket, fellow Clay covered oy silt in this local environment traps watej to form swampy ana sometimes stagnant pools.

PREVIOUS GEOLOGICAL WORK

"J he earliest work w a t.- conduct--.- o b\ j oca l f'J os-pec t ors who discovered a number 02 goiu occurence;? in tne area (eg. Boertn, COOK. and Webber) , but little or no mention ol the james oocurence was; ma.oe.

I wo shafts are present on tne property I'Ciaim No. 8^0011;. Mo mention of tnese wei e found in the asses-.s-.ment l 1 1 e s at the untaric Ministry of Ncrtnern Affairs- ano Mines in i'weed .

T ne Clarenaon area, was legicnally maj pea auiing the su.mmei sof trie untario Department of Mines (Sinitn,

A l ake se-jiment sami'-jirjr p-i of raiiiiue was conoucteo L'V i heG~c - c gi ea j .sijrvev ea L.-a!ia-j,-i in -:. MI j jnc ti on witn tiie Oncario ueoar tinentof K: ne s in iv7b. Anomalc-us levels of Ln . Cu , As. Me-, ano nj- v-'ei eoetecteo in James and Little. Green Lar.e.

Detailea w.-rK over an area v;nich incluoeo the c^ajrr block w^s- conoucted oy St. joseph Explorations Ltd. in July i^7d (Jaci;sc : n, 197&). Geological mapping and b horizon soil sampling wei e cairjeo out. Iwo anornaiies were located. A moderate Po-Z,n anomaly was iouno along the contact between the calcitic ana dolomitic ma: b le east c i Little Green Lake (Claim No. o^o^^j;. A weak Cu-ro-^n anomaly was. outlined along the contact between the calcitic marble ana quartz- feldspar- biotite paragneiss south of James LaKe (Claim No. 840011). Several local gold anomalies were also apparently detected ovei chalcopyrite bearing quartz veins in marble.

In 1980, L. Pauk and G. Mannard of the Ontario Geological Survey, remapp^- the Ardoch Area, wnicn includes tne James r-ropertv l Pauk and Mannard, 1982; . They up'oatea the regional weak aone by Smitn in the eariy lySu's.

I tie soil anomaly east of L.ittie Green L,ane was drill testeo in November 1980 by seico Mining Corporation Limited. A 41.&- metei hole was corea in maroie. Narrow spnalerite stringers were intersected at the bottom of the hole. An assay oi 2 . b/o Ln over 2. 2fc meters was obtained (Sinclair, 1981).

In 1984 a drill hole. 12U meters in length, was collared on claim No. 673434 Dy the vendor C. Koger Young of HavelocK, Ontario. This claim adjoins the James property to the northeast. The hole was drilled to evaluate the industrial potential of the silliminite gneiss unit that trends east along strike from the James Property. Drill results indicated that a suipnide zone of indeterminant length occureci on the south flank of the silliminite gneiss at the contact with dolomitic marble. Unfortunately gold analyses were never recorded for the drill hole.

Homes-take Mineral Development Compelny acquired a group o l eight cioims in June ana Juiv lv c1.;.. Initial worn completed in July iyS6 consisted of reconnaissance b horizon seal geochemistry. Several smaii gold anomalies were j. ocated (Bending,

During the summer 03 I^tt*, the anoustria] mineral potent i a] 01 t. ne si.i.i. imi n.. te gneiss unit was examined oy Stepnen J. Blacr. as part of a Canada - unta.ri-.. Mineral bevel o[ ''mem AFI eement. ruither ;tudv of this un.ii is currently on.eoint1 ;^'.J. BiacK, pers. coiiim. /.

II. GEOLOGY

REGIONAL GEOLOGY

prospect iaes withan the hast ant i ha. s an i fi the western portion of t ne GJ'enviiie Structural Province. Tnis oasin is characterized L-V aivers-e hejiKian volcanic aiio seoiinent ary E-ecuence;-.- an-3 metamorphic graces wnicn range from greens en i s- 1 to upper amphibolite. These volcano-sedimentary sequences occur i ri northeast. to east trending elongate synformal troughs and arcuate relics between granitoid and gabbroic plutons . They are characterised locally by isoclinal folding and the development of shear zones subparaiiei to primary banding and axial planar foliation.

The James claims are located witnin an area mapped by and Mannard (I960). These authors have noted at least two periods' 01 deformation. The first produced easterly trending isoclinal folds ano steeply dipping axial planar foliation. l he latter are subpara.iie] to the bedding. The second period produced more open northeast trending folds. These structures, plunge 10 to 30 degrees to the northeast. The claim block is located along tne nortn flanK. of one of tiie easterly trending anticlines.

The meta-sedimentary and meta-voicsnic rocks in tne area belong to three groups. 1hese are. from youngest to oldest, the Harmon, the Mayo and the Fiinton. Tne contact between tne last two is unconformable.

The Harmon group consists of well preserved pillowed malic flows. The Mayo group consists of dolomitic and calcitic maroies, The Fiinton group consists of quartzite. pebble conglomerate, psammite, pelitic schist and calcitic and dolomitic marbles.

The main intrusive in the area are the Elzevir batholith, a biotite granodiorite to quartz monzonite. the petroiogicaily similar Northbrook Batholith, the Mazinaw Lake Granite and the Addington Pluton, a quartz monzonite fConneily, iyfc'5).

l he Plevna Paujt lies to the west, ui the c j. a i in t . it st ralesnorthwest and is paro-ijei to tne regional joint set. (Smitn, i^-r.oi.l his joint set has inij-uenced the drainage pa 11 ei ri 01 the area.Prominent gullies on tne property are suoparaiiei to tnis fault.

The regional geology is outlinea in Figure 3.

PROPERTY GEOLOGY

Reconnaissance scale geological niapping was-, car lied out on i:P.OGu scale. 'j ne property was traversed nortn-soutn aione paced ana c oiii passed lines spaced approximately ItG metei s a pa 2 t .

Due to the complex nature o i tne geolog v'. exact a,ft; relationships between rock units couia not be determinea.

Mafic voicanoc-iastic rocks on tne property consist 01 two types 01 mafic paragneiss : an aniphib'-'j-i t e-Lo ot ate variety; anc a unit with epioote-chj-oritt clots i-J' c;r,. in iengtn. f ne latter unit n.^v represent reworked maiic pyroclastic jocks. 1 he antphi bo j. i te-Li c 131 1: subunits mav represent nigniy metamorpnosed gaDoro. juocaiiy r^'tn these units are strongly magnetic. In several places the maiic paragneiss units are also garnetiferous.

The mafic paragneiss units are generally moderately to strongly foliated, trending E-NE and dipping steeply to the north. Locally isoclinal folding was noted, the axial planes trending N^u-bC- degrees E and dipping 2U-3U degrees NE.

The mafic paragneiss units tend to occur in contact with the pelitic metasediments, botn to the north and south.

Locally only small lenses of ielsjc volcanoclastic recks wei e noted on tne property. Inev appear to occur in association witn mafic paragneiss . These rocks ai e line gi ained cjuai' t z - J e j dspai - biotite-muscovite gneisses. Locally tnev weather pink suggesting that they may have undergone potassiuiii altei'ation.

e

WESLEMKOON

BATHOLITH

MAZINAW LAKE

GRANITE

Poleozoic Cover

Flinton Group

Plutonic rock*

Morblt

Wockt, luff

BATHOLITH

FLINTON SYNCLINE

Volcanic rocki

AclinolillCloyn*FlintonKolodorMadoc

Figure 3. Regional geology (after Connelly, 1985).

Carbonate metasediments are plentiful aci o s s the propel ty. They consist of calcitic and dolomitic marbles. Locally tfiese units contain variable amounts of calc-silicate material p-jimariiy (ci j opsicie ana tremolite;. Calcitic marDie seems to be tne dominant litnoiogv present. Locally the two types of marble are finely interbedded.

The marbles range in colour from iignt grey to buff-brown, and are generally fine to medium grained. In many instances the only way to distinguish the two varieties is by using dilute HCL whicn causes the calcite marble to effervesse. The dolomitic marble will only effervesse when powdered.

Foliation within the carbonate metasediments is well developed, out nigniy variable. The general trend is E-NE witfi dips near vertical. Locally isoclinal folding was noticed. l he axial planes trend N-.G-60 degrees E and dip iu-30 degrees NE.

The carbonate metasediment^, ai e usually in contact with mafic parafneiss. Near tne soutnern edge of claim No. d^u012 tney are an contact with pelitic metasediment^-. Local j y inter beds of rutty weat.nerins.' clastic metasediments nave Deen noted. especially in tilt shaft areas.

Ihree varieties of clastic metaEeaiments were noted on theproperty: litnic sandstone; quar tr.-f eidspar-muscovi te-oiotite scnist: and quartz-f elot.pai'-Laoti te gneiss... 'i he j at t e) tv-j units are ihe

'S-t abundant. Oeneraj.j.y ti'iei-'e units are i ound in ter oedoea witn inarbles and malic parai-.neit-S'. j hev a l i.-c- i 01 iu a nai i c-v- liiiear t.-i^r treridinx' zcine across cioinis OO.-;^;:T-' aj'io d-'-.-.-i^r.. i .

These ui'jits- are fanej.y barioed , reneially whate t.o buii-biC'Wi'' in coiC'ur ario mocitirateiv ioaiateci. i'ue i -- i i-at iC'n trends ji-i'Jr. aiio dips 50-80 degi ees iiorth. Locaiiv these uiiits may be potatsaurn aiteiec.

l he pelitic metasedimentary ro-c*:s on tne property' consist of muscovi te-tdoti te-sillin.anite-plaj-.i oclase-f,ai net -staurol i t e-magnet ile. They can be suDdivided into tnree units:

1. A high grade zone with lS-30% sillimanite.2. A low grade zone witn 0-157. sillimanite.3. A sillimanite-plagioclase zone with up to 30"i pisgiociaE e.

The high grade zones often nave a large amount of biotite versus muscovite, and locally they have a high percentage oi garnet. Fibrolite, a needie-liKe form of sillimanite fias also been noted ir, the high grade unit. These sub units t orin pods and are ol ten discontinuous along strike.

1 ne pej.it i c metasedimentary units are in contact witn mafic paragneiss to the nortn and marble ana mafic p'aragneiss to the south.

Locally a moderate t-NE foliation is developed in these units. Cross fractures or joints were also noted at 140-160 degrees, these apparently parallel the Plevna fault.

Intruding the marbles and metaclastics on the eastern edge o i the property are a small series of metagabbro diKes and sills. Tnese intrusions are minor and generally occur as 1-20 meters- wide, foliation subparallel sili-liKe bodies wnicn extend from a few meters up to 60 meters in length. In some places these units have been strongly metamorphosed to ampnibolites.

In the southwest cornej ui *-.j.aini Pt fr^OOll. a small i'ejsic intrusive body was- noted .intruding tne m a i" i c and felsic volcano c. i a s t j c rocks. The unit is massive. i 3 ne to medium giaine-C1 . and consists oi quartz, i ei os par. ana baotite, ^ocaiiv tne unit is cut bv irregular 1-3 mni biotite cnjonie stJin^eit. Due to p^.or exposure, exact contact reiat i onsni t-'S. witn trie voicanociastic root's cannot ue determined.

Metamoi phisiii on trie prupeitv av-peaj s, ti.' hcive i-fcincueu amphibolite facies.

Structurally. aJL the 2 ock units 11 enci L-Nt. with vaj j ab] eclips, l ne varjation ^n dip may oe -due to isoclinal folding mattrenjs N^t.'-t.u de.ei e e s r. ana plunge;-.. IL'-3L- oegi ees Nt .

III. GEOPHYSICS

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY METHODS

V^L^F^_EH~iS' : J i je L'H-ie' unit n E aii sensitive i eceivei whici. is tuned to the frequency 01 tht- V . L . t . t i ans .mi 11 i rig station useo . During the survey on the James property Seattle {NLK 24.b Knz.j was used. This station was located in an direction near that oi the baseline. The operator tooK 20 meter readings on tne luu meter grio. Direction of survey was towards the north in order t c- detect possibjt- conductive zones that were parallel to tne baseline.

Occasionally the operator tuned the instiument to Annapolis. (NSS 21.4 Khz j in order to detect possible conductive zones tnat were. parallel to the grid lines.

When the operator approaches, an conductive zone, the signal from one of tne cons i Vertical Axis; is minimized by til tint: t:ie instrument. 'i his tilt ir measured i ri pejcentage. Oioss-ing over a zone causes a tilt angj.e from positive to negative in trie in- pna.se

'component. The remaining signal is oaianceo using tne quadrature control.

A very good conductoi gives an signal 0 1 positive to negative on in-phase component and negative to positive in quadrature component. In-phase dip angle data was manipulated in order to srnootn the data. Tnis method is called fraser filtering and was performed i n areas of noisy readings or areas of .LOW amplitude inflections (Frasei 1969). Sensitivity of this instrument is ln-Phase:*- ibO/o

Quadrature: *- 40/e

SCINTRjEX-MP-2-MAGNETOMh;TEh: The MF-2 magnetometer uses the method of proton precession. in this method the total magnetic field is measured in the vicinity of tne nvdro-carbon filled coil. Protons in this fluid align themselves with the magnetic fjeld when a reading is taken. The amount oi precession is converted to signal measured in gammas. headings were taken at reg:u]ai ^0 met ei inteivaj.t along. K I 3 o lines. Corrections for drift were done using tne oaseline tie-in method. Sensitivity of this instrument as -t-- l Gamma

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY ANALYSIS

|James East Grid (Map i;

A smajj grid was cut within (.lain! No. b-C'o^o . Inree conductive. c*ns were detected ov tne v . L, . r . method. Ali three conductors.

were very wesk ana onjv Gist ini-.-.uishaL.je al tei iijteiii.'g 01 the date-.

COi'JDl'C i O r! A: LO-t UU-oi-'r-iUt' To i^ii + UOt.-^^ t?-..;^Ihis ^onductoi' may be atti i L'Ut at:J.e to the contact L^t v-e^n

the dolomitic marine s no tne ea j. c it i c iriar'Oa.e.

CT OK b: LL'-njii-r^bu^ Tc- L^. + UuE-V -r^bSA ween'. coriductor wnicri iGnows ciosej.v tne contact tietweeii

the mafic paragneiss and the dolomitic marble.

CONDUCTOR C: LU-KJU-7-HOS To L2+ UOt- 7-f 70SA similar conductor to b it follows the contact between the

mafic paragneiss and the calcitic marDie.

No crosscutting structures were interpreted although a strong negative response was ootained from tne edge of Little Green Lake. This may indicate a structure paralleling the Plevna fault.

Magnetics on James East Grid (Map 2;A very strong magnetic response occur: ea on Lo + uu-b-t 2 G S . lias

may be attributable to an mafic paragneiss unit in tnis vicinitv. i' ne^second magnetic hig;h Lo-t-OUt-t' + fcSLib c'c-urB in ai! area whej e li.j-j :i -:'paragneiss outcrops. A low magnetic anomaly occurs at L 3-*- u o d j* L-.I?can tje tne result oi a large dolomitic m a i Lie unit.

James Grid i.Map3 ;

V.L.F. Survey Results -- Seattle (NLK)A total of 14 Kin. of v' . L . F . surveying was completed on

main James grid. From the survey some 10 conductive zones were interpreted .

CONDUCTOR A: L2+ OOE-3+5GN To L21+GGE-1+3GSA long linear moderate conductor, it can be traced across tne

whole grid. It is following a probable contact between the nisi i c paragneiss and clastic metasediments . It is aorumptly broken between L4 + OOE and 5 + GGE which may indicate a cross-, cutting I suit.

CONDUCTOK B: LI24 UUK-2-H ON To t,21 40GH:~04lGNThis conductor follows the contact between mafic par&gnei s.s.

a no calcitic maroie.

CONL'-UO 'J uK C : LI 1 - 1 -* li Li i -i. + bui 1'. j O LJ 'y-n^ut - J t J L'HA short conJuc tor attrioutaoie to t ne contact oetween c j. as i, a c

metasediments ana calcitic marble.

CTOi-; D: ut. -t UL't- G- /OH jC' j^H-f O ..j t- L'-*- boi-J

touna al -M'lgE'i ae ti'ie t w a in p it is pioL'oblv oue to eogt- eJiect.

CTOH L: L J t ui'i.- -^ r-U!S To i^^i -t- UJt- l * -r-'u^ :'Iliis- conductive ^one t-nowt a itjativejv good ret{.'ons.e on tiie west sioe of gr i ci ana ccu^a oe tne result of ti'ie presence of sill pniciei- . it enters. the p... wes lane a f; o then einei gtr. to lC'iic.w cC'ntazt Detween pelitic nietasedj.nient.5' ario inaiic ve. j canoe lattice .

..' i\'t\ t : L*^-i 'J--' - 'J t /'Ui' I -O i^J l -f iJ'Jc.- .I' + -GS :"

This v-c.pjcuc i j ve r.one follows. the p^'Wei j i ne ana ma\ L^e attrit'Uted tc the poweriine effect. It closely par a i le x s trie contact between dolomitic marble a no calcitic marble. It i r- possibie that it extends across- tne grid to L,2i

CONDUCTOK G: L3+GGE- l -t- 7 US lo L^An isolated conductor occurring on tne edge of an swamp.

CONDUCTOK H: Ll + OOE- 1 +90S To Llil*UUE-4-i-40S?Follows the approximate location of contact between dolomitic. marble and calcitic marble. J t may extend eastward toL21+GGE.

CONDUCTOK i : LS-t-ooE-soos TO LiiAn short conductor tnat may follow a contact between mafic intrusives and calcitic m&iLde. j. t may extend acrot.f the jt.j J a to L 2 1 4 u G i' .

C^NDUC'i'OK J: Li -t- GOE- G -i- V UK 'lo Ll + GUE-G-*- 9UKAn isolated conductor wnicn is found aionesioe a swampy area. it may be caut-eo DV a clay eoge eiiect.

V.L.F. Survey Results -- Annapolis (NSS)

V.L.F. coverage incluaed reading lacing east in orcier to delineate any cross cutting structures. Five conductive zone were detected on more then a single line.

CONDUCTOR A: Station 1+GON-4+50E To BL 0+OU-4+90EThis zone is a moderate conductoi. It causes a break in NLK

conductor A. It may in fact be the most important cross structure found on the grid as it parallels the Plevna fault. It is lost in the powerline noise but appears to enter into tne large swamp.

CONDUCTOR B: Station 2+20N-7+SOE To BL O+GO-S+IOEA moderate conductor wnicn is possibly a joint wnicn crosses

the grid.

CONDUCTOR C: Station ^ -ION-12-t-buL lo BJ. G+OG-12+1 CI.This conductor was interpreted across five separate line*.

It has a moderate response ana may indicate a joint system.

CONDUCTOR D: Station i -t- uuN- i d-t ioE lo c; j. u + Gu- Itf+f-OtInterpreted across two l i lies this conductive zone may

indicate an jointing system.

CONDUCTOR L : s tatical i+buN-isi+tdt. rio B J o + GG-39+f-.Gfr.Anc'tner wear, conduct j. ve zone wnicn is parallel to tne Fievna

fault.

Ali five of the above zones are paia.ijej to each other ano nave an o r i entat i cai wnicn is similar tC' tne ma.i or jointing pattern which crosses the James p.i -. o .

Additional m i no J conductive hoi izons welt i iiierpj fcteo alc'ii? the baseline. Tney are not present on any otner surveyed lines. Many could be power i j nt n^ose as tiie entaie.- Lias.eJirie C'^cuih. directly Deiow tne poweriirie.

James Grid Magnetics (.Map 4;

Strong poweriine noise in the area of the grio, which is in close proximity to the poweriine, exnioits small localized anomalies.

Strong magnetic responses occur in areas of mat a c volcanoclastic rocks. Lower magnetic signatures are occuring in areas of dolomitic and calcitic marbles.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

James East Grid-

Since no significant conductive zones or cross cuttin? structures were interpreted no further worK is recommended. Due to the high negative background response in the vicinity of the lake, winter reconnaissance lines with tne V.L.F. may determine if a structure does exist in this vicinity. Ihis would be undertaken utanr station Annapolis (Nssj at 10 meter station intervals.

James Grid-

Many long linear trends wei e detected usint; the \ . i,. t . method ana tnese were interpreted as contacts oetween different uni^s. in s L'me cases tries c mav contain jc'Oid beaniu. sulphides, j t -i recC'iurnendeu tnat furtne}" detailed wC'ir. oe carried out on ai'i oet.au j ea winter grid to the north and east oi the thcut ai er* cove?r:n^; t ne svjamp. Sucn an survey may pCiSsiC-j.y delineate the ap'proximat'S iocaciojj of the Annapolis. Conductor h . 'i hi s conductor, which could be a i'ai'ji. , may be responsi c ie for displacement of t ne roc r. unit tnat nosts tnt gO-Ld bearing quarts ^n which the shaft f- are j. oca ted.

Kespectrui

i".hSUn r . h '51 ! eiit

REFERENCES

Bending, D. A., 198D. Geoiogicaj. assessment report, james Prospect. Company report lor Hoinestake Minei ai Development Company.

Christie, B. J., 1987. Geological assessment report, James Claim Group Company report for Homestake Mineral Development Company.

Connelly, J.N., 1985. The Elzevir Batnolith: emplacement history with respect to the Grenville Supergi oup and Flinton Group. southeastern Ontario; in Current Research, Part B, Geological Survey of Canada, Open File Reports ADS -and 406.

Fraser, D. C., 1969. Contouring of V.L.F.-EM Data. Geopnysics, Voi . JA No . 6

Jackson, R., l9Vb. GeojogicaJi 3 epoi't , Araoch Property , claienoon Township. Company report, for St. Josepn Exploration

F a UK. . L. ana Mannard, u. 1 9t^ . FTecaiiiL'r j an geology 01 the Aiooch A je^ ioutnej'n Ontario: untariu GeC'j.o-|icai Survey Wap r 1 .^^.-,- Geological Series- Fi ej i m a iiai y hap, scale i:it,fri--0 ea j a ne tC' 1/4 miae. Geology ir-'t-v.-1 .

Sinciaar, s . G . L., l^oj . heport oil uj am.ona LO la j j n*-: , orenvjjje hiC'jecx St. jcie uptiC'i'i. Companv report fc.r selco rJinins: Cca' pc.rs cic^n Li mi tea .

Srniti'i, B. L. I^r-o, Geoiogv 01 t ne c.j arena en- Dalhciusie Area; p. a -"t- i untario i,''ep ; irtiiiei"it. c^i Mi.ii'is. Annuoj. hepc^rt, VOI.OD, r'ai'c. ,- .

It-

APPENDIX l - MAPS

APPENDIX 2-

GEOPHYSICAL-GEOLOGICAL-GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

CERTIFICATE

With regai as to my report ^ i ^ une I"/ , i 96b , prepai eel i ci homes i c- k* Mineral Development Company, I , Shaun P. Parent, of 30 Cnaries Street West Apartment 20U8. Toronto, Ontario ao certiiy that:

l . I am a graduate from the Geological Technician Program at Sir Sandford Fleming College. Lindsay, Ontario 1 9 /b.

2. I am presently enrolled in the Biopnvsicai Systems Program at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

J. I have been practicing my profession since 1976.

i*. J am a current employee 01 nomestake Mineral Devel opment company -

5. l .have ne ant e) en. in tn^ cxdiinr c ove: ea LW tlas- repoi t . no J" ac i expect anv interest.

Da t. ea t h a s /8

t ft au r. r . r'aj'ent

Senior Assistan ir'enic-r :jec-i"'.'i'v'.v. j

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ontario

Report of Work

(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Mining Act

DOCUMENT NO.

W8809- 43 Instructions: Please type or print.^7^-^-^'/ 7If number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this form, attach a list.

Note: Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

Do not use shaded areas below.

Type of Survtv

Claim Holder(s)

Township or Area

(-- (A f 6*

Prospector's Licence No.

Address

St.Survey Company

AA;Date of Survey ffrom to to)

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Tecnnical report

,vt . ?0

1 8f iTotal Miles of.line Cut

H. oIA/.

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

RECS

MAY 3

____MINING LAttfiSAirborne CredifV"""

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer i

- Radiometric j

i- Other \f\^ p i

Geological !

Geochemical

Days per Claim ^

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

1 VJEJD

1 Days per l Claim

.

i WGeological

j Days per ; Claim

Note: Special provisions j Electromagnetic

credits do not apply

to Airborne Surveys. Magnetometer

Radiometric

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on ClaimU)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix

"~. 1 .*i.-*-l, "j f* ,

NumberExpend. Days Cr.

Mining ClaimPrefix Nurnber

NG-DIV:REC^BLVMD^

AMW31TW

*

Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Date Recorded Holder or Agent ^Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work (J

Total Days CO Date Recorded Recorded l

1 hereby certify that 1 have a personal anr/intimate knowledge of the facts set forin in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work - or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is trus.

Name and Postal

" ' "' " s-""'

^

Address

to 10 c

? .

i

1

of

1

i

Person

, ^t

Certifying

rr* ,

/ Date Certified Certified by (Signature) i

~.-t

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ontario

Geophysical-Geological-Geochemical Technical Data Statement

File

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s).

Township or Area ClAI^'M^OU

Claim Hnlder(s) \-W\es'K(re

Survey Company_

Author of Report.

Address of Author 3o

\JP l rt

.L/l

U ^ /\pt

Covering Dates of Survey f L Q A V o -re* /ci 0^(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line Cut

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

DAYS per claimGeophysicalO D -Electromagnetic -^^

-Radiometric

-Other

Geological.

Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer____Electromagnetic. . Radiometric

DATE:.

(enter days per claim)

SIGNATURE:Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix).23.6ALL.

(number)

.842A5TJL

TOTAL CLAIMS.

637 (85/12)

IND

UC

ED P

OLA

RIZA

TIO

N-

RES

ISTI

VIT

Yh^

t*3

flj

g -

ft"3

0

0

O

O

O

*^"*

P-

J2^

"6

rt

(D

rf

-S

Sr—

ft3

^

t? -

S. ft

02.

-3 fl

Ai t

? 2s

S

!

2 25

ft c

.v

ft;

f*

t

* P

^ ;

! s.

lq

. "

D5-

0

0

0

H

~

2.

s;

s g'

(TO

^

J*

C".

ft

1

1 ^ |

3

f*

gr-

* F rt

^M

5" Dh

vrt

*—*

^W

' * J

' * J

w*

^

rt

w

-2

-2rt)

i—

s—

ft

ft3

3

o n

^

ve? O 0 3 su 5'

GR

AV

ITY

Elevatio

3 fi)

O curac <

63

fi) ft en fit r*

5" 3 —

ft 3 O. o" S r

* o' 3

O

W3

1 S.

sft

rt ,

0

0S.

o

O

33

en

!T

rt

t" p

fi) Q.

ft

3 rt-

ELEC

TRO

MA

GN

ETIC

MA

GN

ETIC

Parameters

measur n CL -\ ii ^ ? ^ 3-

w •s a r j*] M f

ft 2.

o 5-

g

0S

B-o

D **3

^—

ft—

O.

TV

| gJ-

J09 ^•

D^^

-o/^

o r-*

- cr ' B-

IP ^. ^ ^

l — i

~~ T

1 j

^ s4 5' ft ^ i* v CD ft" ^ 5' ft

1

Accuracy. 1 p ^ ' D c f- l 5 i ^. -4^ ^ 5*

2.

o s i"

p li,

E f

o'

s o' 3

-

*— •e;

c!~^ iL"

PC ^ 5' ^ •^ r^ 31 * "f™" i., P s •7 1 O 2. r T?* j o t : "0

Instrument D /y rh^ t ^ s" ^

Accuracy — Scale

Diurnal

correction

Base

Station

checi

Base

Station

locati O

'

3

3"

S s-

o-

(^

i i

c ^* |

•~- -r- c. c.

CA v*

11 ^ O t

p p-*, ?p ^ J~- *

o*v

U;

fj -C

method

^ o 5 lo S r1* *

-

f O- b-

constant — rt- — St pt c.

Instrument -} l ~j v-

t-i ~^

i

O

CContour

interval

.—— 0

C o 7 5 P -, f 5^ l f

o H" en

O ~

ft" 3 v*- M S '^s'

--^—

-^

C/5

r^-

r* o"

5' r*

O C r.

GROUND

SURVEY

Number

of

Stations.

oo 1—4

*-*

l 3•J

--

O^ _

n

*-^*

ET

*W i

oi

WS

O5

-si

g *

2en

MM

•8 C

S; r

^

HCL

CD

w

^Nr*

t^

J

"*

^

*fc.

ft 3

w 2

w

cr

n ™

"S3

^ 0

i' 2,

v S

( rq

^

" >

n

0p

—i

O.

g5'

S

f0"

O 3

-ra

rs

vj

GX ^ T"

- fl'"

*1

— -

f*-0

\J

^

i3 1*^*

^^f

e•^

"" W

^^

^

SELF POTENTIALInstrument___________________________________________ Range.Survey Method ——————————-————^^-^———--——.—...—..^^.^^—..—...—..—.

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.Values measured .

Energy windows (levels) -————^——.^——.^^—-.^^—...—..————...———....-.^—..^—Height of instrument______________________________Background Count. Size of detector——————.———-——.—.—-———————..^—-——————.—.^^—^—

Overburden __________________________________________————(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey————-————-—^———————-——

Instrument .—^-—————-—-—————————-—--^—Accuracy——-—--—.—-—————-—.-.———————.-—--—.Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNEJPRVEYS Type of survey(s)————

Instrument(s) —————{specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy————^———-——^—^——(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used.——————^——^———.-—.——..^^^^^^^-^——Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude________________________________Line Spacing—— Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight,—————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth——.^— Terrain—————————

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

D DCD

Cu, Pb,

Others—

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field AnalysisExtraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ——————————.

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used ——.

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory —. Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used———

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

GeneraL General.

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ontario Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

September 22, 1988 Your File: W8809-43 Our File: 2.11427

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and Mines10 Wellesley Street East, 1st FloorToronto, OntarioM4Y 1G2

Dear Madam:

Re: Notice of Intent dated September 7, 1988Geophysical VLF (Electromagnetic S Magnetometer) Survey submitted on Mining Claims EO 840011 et al in the Twp of Clarenden______________-

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

ONTARIO GEOL004CAL SUB VE VASSESSMENT FILES

OFFICE

HOT 13 1988

RECEIVED

W.R. Cowan, Manager Mining Lands Section Mines S Minerals Division

Whitney Block, Room 6610 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

Telephone: (416) 965-4888

AB: ma

c.c. Homestake Mineral Development Co. 640-1380 Burrard Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2H3

Homestake Mineral Development Co.30 Charles Street West#2008Toronto, OntarioM5Y 2R5Attn: Mr. Shaun Parent

Mr. G.H. FergusonMining S Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario

Resident Geologist Tweed, Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Development

inesOntario

Technical Assessment Work Credits

Date

September 7, 1988

File2.11427

Mining Recorder's Report of Work No.

W8809-43

Recorded HolderHomestake Mineral Development Company

Township or AreaClarendon Twp.

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical/i pFlprtrnmagnptic CU day.:

40Magnetometflr . riayt

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological rfay*

Geoehemir.al days

Man days | | Airborne | |

Special provision Q Ground [^l

i l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

l l Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

EO 840011 to 014 incl. 840343 862457 - 59

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

20 days magnetometer 10 days VLF

EO 840342

Mo credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

Q not sufficiently covered by the survey Q insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.

828 (85/12)

Miller Twp. (M.127)

XIV XIII Xil XI x45

45

A A

OLO

CL ^\~

O)

O OD

Twp.(M. 109) Olcen Tv/p. ( M. 136)

CDre

Q. ^

C OCO

oCL

THE TOWNSHIP OF

CLARENDONCOUNTY OF FRONTENAC

SOUTHERN ONTARIO

MINING DIVISION

SCALD |-|NCr^40 CHAINSLEGEND

RftTENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLEDTRAILSPATENTED S. R.O.

C.S.© Loc.L.O.

MR.Q S.R.O.

C

e

NOTES This Map Is Not To Be UsedFOR SURVEY PURPOSES

Lot And Concession Lines Shown Hereon Are Projected From The Best Information Available, But Their TTUP Position Is Noi Guaranteed, For Official Survey Purposes Consult The Original Survey Plans And Field Notes Of Records In The Ministry of Natural Resources.

400 1 surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

Flooded Lands Shown Thus:

Flooding Rights Reserved On Cross Lake And Fawn Lake To Elevation 110.5'. File: 126 113,

Original Survey Line Of Fconlenac Road Shown Thus:———- ——— - ———

Island* in Clarendon Lake shown thus G&Z&r'

Surface Rights Only withdrawn from staking.Fi) t l 60709 .

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM STAKINGS.R. - SURFACE R IGHTS M.R.-MINiNG RIGHTS

Section Order No. Date Disposition F ile i

Rtifrvtd for Public Uti

MN R R*i*r

R t icrva t i on

S R 87431

SR 125373

S R I4C86I

SRSMR 92175

PLAN NC.-M.77

31C15NW**31 2.11427 CLARENDON 200

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF N ATURAL RESOURCES jSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

8^00

1

8^0

01

3

QH

OO

l1!

8^03

42

HO

ME

STA

KE

MIN

ER

AL

DE

VE

LOP

ME

NT

C

OM

PA

NY

lift

*.

V-O

rr i

Ao

r

TOTf

tL

FIE

LD M

fl&N

ET

KS

JflM

ES

PROP

ERTY

3IC

15N

W00

31

2.1

1427

CLA

REN

DO

N210

STAT

ION

:NLK

(SEf

nTLO

SU

RVEY

DIR

ECTIO

N: N

ORTH

INP

Hft

St-

——

—*

STAT

ICN

:SU

RVEY

DlR

EaiC

N.Er

!ST

3!C

15N

WeB

3!

2.1

1427

CLA

REN

DO

N

LITTLE GREEN LflKE

oCO

o

Ulo o•I-

UJo

LU O O

100

SCflLE

-2000

4+00 S

5+00 S

7+00 s

f 18*00 S

9+00 S

HOMESTAKE --T5--

MINERAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANYTOTAL FIELP MAGNETICS

STATION REAPING: sioootOO

JAMES PROPERTY

DRAWN DATE06/06/08

FILE CODE

31 C 15

31C15NW0031 2.11427 CLARENDON 230

OO

LJ O O

UJc* O

CD4- ro

100

SCflLE METE85

5+OOS

T+003

1X8*00 S

HOMES,TA#E MINERAL DEVELOPMENT

EM-lfc VLF SURVEYS!JAMES PROP.EftT* ,

SURVEV DlR NORTH coMDtVn5R"^M :

VERTICAL SCALE: ICM ~ -?07o , a . t i a i

DRAWN .DATE04/05/88

FILE CODE

31 C IS

^••Tw 1 "")

COMPANY

^0

. REftOlNCSj

• P

31C15N*eC31 2 .11427 CLARENDON 240