round rock research v. acer et. al
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
1/24
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA
CORP., ACER AMERICA
HOLDINGS, INC., and GATEWAY,
INC.,
Defendants.
))
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. _______________
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Round Rock Research, LLC (Round Rock Research), for its Complaint
against defendants Acer Inc., Acer America Corporation (Acer America), Acer American
Holdings, Inc. (Acer American Holdings), and Gateway, Inc. (Gateway) (collectively,
Acer or Defendants) hereby alleges as follows:
THE PARTIES
1. Plaintiff Round Rock Research is a Delaware limited liability company with itsprincipal place of business at Jersey City, New Jersey 07302.
2. Defendant Acer Inc. is a company organized and existing under the laws ofTaiwan, Republic of China with its principal place of business at 8F, 88, Sec. 1, Hsin Tai Wu
Rd., Hsichih, Taipei, Hsien 221, Taiwan, R.O.C.
3. Defendant Acer America is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Acer Inc. and aCalifornia corporation with its principal place of business at 333 West San Carlos Street, Suite
1500, San Jose, California. Acer America has appointed CT Corporation System located at 818
West Seventh Street, Los Angeles, California as its agent for service of process.
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
2/24
2
4. Defendant Acer American Holdings is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gatewayand a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 7565 Irvine Center Drive,
Irvine, California. Acer American Holdings has appointed CT Corporation System located at
1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware as its agent for service of process.
5. Defendant Gateway is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Acer America and aDelaware corporation with its principal place of business at 7565 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine,
California 92618. Gateway has appointed CT Corporation System located at 818 West Seventh
Street, Los Angeles, California as its agent for service of process.
NATURE OF THE ACTION
6. This is a civil action for the infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,787,174(the 174 Patent) (attached as Exhibit A); 5,991,843 (the 843 Patent) (attached as Exhibit
B); 6,002,613 (the 613 Patent) (attached as Exhibit C); 6,845,053 (the 053 Patent)
(attached as Exhibit D); 7,138,823 (the 823 Patent) (attached as Exhibit E); 7,285,979 (the
979 Patent) (attached as Exhibit F); 7,336,531 (the 531 Patent) (attached as Exhibit G); and
7,389,369 (the 369 Patent) (attached as Exhibit H) (collectively, the Patents-in-Suit) under
the Patent Laws of the United States 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
7. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a) because this action arises under the patent laws of the United States,
including 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq.
8. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because, among otherthings, each Defendant has committed, aided, abetted, contributed to, and/or participated in the
commission of patent infringement in this judicial district and elsewhere that led to foreseeable
harm and injury to Round Rock Research. Moreover, Defendants Gateway and Acer American
Holdings are Delaware corporations who, having availed themselves of Delawares corporate
laws, are subject to personal jurisdiction in Delaware.
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
3/24
3
9. This Court also has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because, among otherthings, Defendants have established minimum contacts within the forum such that the exercise of
jurisdiction over Defendants will not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial
justice. Moreover, Defendants have placed products that practice the claimed inventions of the
Patents-in-Suit into the stream of commerce with the reasonable expectation and/or knowledge
that purchasers and users of such products were located within this judicial district. And
Defendants sold, advertised, marketed, and distributed in this judicial district products that
practice the claimed inventions of the Patents-in-Suit.
10. In addition, Defendants knowingly induced, and continue to knowingly induce,infringement within this District by making, using, offering for sale, and selling infringing
products, as well as contracting with others to use, market, sell, and offer to sell infringing
products, all with knowledge of the Patents-in-Suit and their claims; with knowledge that its
customers will use, market, sell, and offer to sell, the infringing products in the United States;
and with the knowledge contracting with others to market and sell infringing products in this
District and elsewhere in the United States; and with the knowledge and intent to encourage and
facilitate infringing sales and use of the products by others within this District and the United
States by creating and/or disseminating instructions and other materials for the products with like
mind and intent.
11. Moreover, Defendants knowingly contributed to others infringement, andcontinue to contribute to others infringement of the Patents-in-Suit by others in this District, by
selling or offering to sell components of infringing products in this District which components
constitute a material part of the inventions of the Patents-in-Suit; knowing of the Patents-in-Suit
and their claims; knowing those components to be especially made or especially adapted for use
to infringe the Patents-in-Suit; and knowing that those components are not staple articles or
commodities of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
12. Venue is proper in this judicial district as to each Defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b).
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
4/24
4
THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT
13. On July 28, 1998, the 174 Patent, titled Remote Identification Of IntegratedCircuit, was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Round
Rock Research is the assignee of all rights, title, and interest in the 174 Patent, and it possesses
all rights to sue and recover for any current or past infringement of the 174 Patent.
14. On November 23, 1999, the 843 Patent, titled Method And System ForConcurrent Computer Transaction Processing, was duly and legally issued by the United States
Patent and Trademark Office. Round Rock Research is the assignee of all rights, title, and
interest in the 843 Patent, and it possesses all rights to sue and recover for any current or past
infringement of the 843 Patent.
15. On December 14, 1999, the 613 Patent, titled Data Communication ForMemory, was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Round Rock Research is the assignee of all rights, title, and interest in the 613 Patent, and it
possesses all rights to sue and recover for any current or past infringement of the 613 Patent.
16. On January 18, 2005, the 053 Patent, titled Power Throughput Adjustment InFlash Memory, was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Round Rock Research is the assignee of all rights, title, and interest in the 053 Patent, and it
possesses all rights to sue and recover for any current or past infringement of the 053 Patent.
17. On November 21, 2006, the 823 Patent, titled Apparatus And Method ForIndependent Control Of On-Die Termination For Output Buffers Of A Memory Device, was
duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Round Rock
Research is the assignee of all rights, title, and interest in the 823 Patent, and it possesses all
rights to sue and recover for any current or past infringement of the 823 Patent.
18. On October 23, 2007, the 979 Patent, titled Apparatus And Method ForIndependent Control Of On-Die Termination For Output Buffers Of A Memory Device, was
duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Round Rock
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
5/24
5
Research is the assignee of all rights, title, and interest in the 979 Patent, and it possesses all
rights to sue and recover for any current or past infringement of the 979 Patent.
19. On February 26, 2008, the 531 Patent, titled Multiple Level Cell MemoryDevice With Single Bit Per Cell, Re-Mappable Memory Block, was duly and legally issued by
the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Round Rock Research is the assignee of all
rights, title, and interest in the 531 Patent, and it possesses all rights to sue and recover for any
current or past infringement of the 531 Patent.
20. On June 17, 2008, the 369 Patent, titled Active Termination Control, was dulyand legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Round Rock Research is
the assignee of all rights, title, and interest in the 369 Patent, and it possesses all rights to sue
and recover for any current or past infringement of the 369 Patent.
COUNT I
Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,787,174
21. Paragraphs 1-20 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein.22. Acer has infringed, and continues to infringe, the 174 Patent under 35 U.S.C.
271, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents by making, using, offering for sale,
selling, and/or importing into the United States products that include Bluetooth and/or 802.11
wireless communication functionality (174 Infringing Products), including at least the
following products: Acer Iconia A series Tablets (including at least A100-07u08u, A100-
07u08w, A100-07u16u, A100-10S16u, A500-10S32u, and A500-10S16w).
23. Acer has also indirectly infringed, and continues to indirectly infringe, the 174Patent. Acer has had knowledge of the 174 Patent and its infringement since at least March 30,
2011 through a letter sent by Round Rock Research concerning that infringement. In addition,
Acer has had knowledge of the 174 Patent and its infringement thereof since the original
Complaint was filed in action no. 1:11-cv-00977-RGA on October 14, 2011. Acers customers
directly infringe the 174 Patent by making, using, selling, and/or offering for sale 174
Infringing Products in the United States.
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
6/24
6
24. Acer actively, knowingly, and intentionally induced, and continues to actively,knowingly, and intentionally induce, infringement of the 174 Patent by making, using, offering
for sale, and selling 174 Infringing Products, as well as by contracting with others to use,
market, sell, and offer to sell 174 Infringing Products, all with knowledge of the 174 Patent and
its claims; with knowledge that its customers will use, market, sell, and offer to sell 174
Infringing Products; and with the knowledge and intent to encourage and facilitate infringing
sales and uses of 174 Infringing Products through the creation and dissemination of promotional
and marketing materials, instructional materials, product manuals, and technical materials related
to 174 Infringing Products.
25. Acer has also contributed to the infringement by others (e.g., Acers customersand the users of 174 Infringing Products), and continues to contribute to infringement by others,
by selling, offering to sell, or importing 174 Infringing Products in the United States, knowing
that those systems constitute a material part of the inventions of the 174 Patent, knowing those
systems to be especially made or adapted to infringe the 174 Patent, and knowing that those
systems are not staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for substantial non-
infringing use.
26. Acer directly and/or indirectly has infringed, and continues to infringe at leastclaims 1, 2, 4, 6, and 15 of the 174 Patent.
27. Round Rock Research has been and continues to be damaged by Acersinfringement of the 174 Patent.
28. Acer has willfully infringed, and continues to willfully infringe, the 174 Patentdespite having received notice of its infringement from Round Rock Research.
COUNT II
Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,991,843
29. Paragraphs 1-28 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein.
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
7/24
7
30. Acer has infringed, and continues to infringe, the 843 Patent under 35 U.S.C. 271, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents by making, using, offering for sale,
selling, and/or importing into the United States infringing computer systems that include
Universal Serial Bus (USB) 3.0 functionality, (843 Infringing Products), including at least the
following products: All in One Z3 models (including AZ3101-U4062 and AZ3171-UR30P),
Aspire M3 models (including AM3400-B4052, AM3400-U4132, AM3410-UR21P, and
AM3410-UR22P), Aspire One 522 models (including A0522-BZ465, ZO522-BZ824, and
AO522-BZ897), Aspire One 721 models (including AO721-3620), Aspire One 722 models
(including AO722-BZ197, AO722-BZ454, AO722-BZ480, AO722-BZ608, AO722-BZ699,
AO722-BZ816, AO722-BZ848, and AO722-0611), Aspire X1 models (including AX1420G-
U5832), Aspire X3 models (including AX3400-U4032), Aspire models (including S4250-
BZ637, AS5250-BZ641, AS5250-BZ853, AS5250-BZ873, AS5253-BZ480, AS5253-BZ656,
AS5253-BZ659, AS5253-BZ660, AS5253-BZ684, AS5253-BZ819, AS5253-BZ873, AS5253-
BZ893, AS5552-3452, AS5552-3691, AS5552-3857, AS5552-5898, AS5552-7474, AS5552-
7650, AS5552-7803, AS5552G-7632, AS5552G-7641M AS5560-SB609, AS5560-SB653,
AS5560-SB835, AS5560G-SB485, AS7551-7422, AS7551-7471, AS7551G-7606, AS7552G-
5430, and AS7552G-6436), Gateway NV models (including NV50A02u, NV53A82u,
NV53A88u, NV55S02u, NV55S04u, NV55S13u, NV55S15u, NV75S02u, and NV75S17u),
Gateway One ZX models (including ZX4351-UR20P), ICONIA Tab W models (including
W500-BZ467 and W500P-BZ841), Revo 100 models (including RL100-U1002), and Veriton X
models (including VX2110-UA260W, VX2110-BU260W, and VX2110-US150W).
31. Acer has also indirectly infringed, and continues to indirectly infringe, the 843Patent. Acer has had knowledge of the' 843 Patent and its infringement since at least July 15,
2011 through correspondence from Round Rock Research concerning that infringement. In
addition, Acer has had knowledge of the 843 Patent and its infringement thereof since the
original Complaint was filed in Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00977-RGA on October 14, 2011.
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
8/24
8
Acers customers directly infringe the 843 Patent by making, using, selling, and/or offering for
sale 843 Infringing Products in the United States.
32. Acer actively, knowingly, and intentionally induced, and continues to actively,knowingly, and intentionally induce, infringement of the 843 Patent by making, using, offering
for sale, and selling 843 Infringing Products, as well as by contracting with others to use,
market, sell, and offer to sell 843 Infringing Products, all with knowledge of the 843 Patent and
its claims; with knowledge that its customers will use, market, sell, and offer to sell 843
Infringing Products; and with the knowledge and intent to encourage and facilitate those
infringing sales and uses of 843 Infringing Products through the creation and dissemination of
promotional and marketing materials, instructional materials, product manuals, and technical
materials related to 843 Infringing Products.
33. Acer has also contributed to the infringement by others (e.g., Acers customersand the users of 843 Infringing Products), and continues to contribute to infringement by others,
by selling, offering to sell, or importing 843 Infringing Products in the United States, knowing
that those systems constitute a material part of the inventions of the 843 Patent, knowing those
systems to be especially made or adapted to infringe the 843 Patent, and knowing that those
systems are not staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for substantial non-
infringing use.
34. Acer directly and/or indirectly has infringed, and continues to infringe, at leastclaims 1, 2, 17, and 18 of the 843 Patent.
35. Round Rock Research has been and continues to be damaged by Acersinfringement of the 843 Patent.
36. Acer has willfully infringed, and continues to willfully infringe, the 843 Patentdespite having received notice of its infringement from Round Rock Research.
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
9/24
9
COUNT III
Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,002,613
37. Paragraphs 1-36 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein.38. Acer has infringed, and continues to infringe, the 613 Patent under 35 U.S.C.
271, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, directly and/or indirectly, by
making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing into the United States infringing
products containing DDR memory (e.g., mDDR, LPDDR, LPDDR2, DDR, DDR2, DDR3
DRAM), (collectively, 613 Infringing Products), including at least All in One Z3 models
(including AZ3101-U4062 and AZ3171-UR30P), Aspire M3 models (including AM3400-
B4052, AM3400-U4132, AM3410-UR21P, and AM3410-UR22P), Aspire One 522 models
(including AO522-BZ465, AO522-BZ824, and AO522-BZ897), Aspire One 721 models
(including AO721-3620), Aspire One 722 models (including AO722-BZ197, AO722-BZ454,
AO722-BZ480, AO722-BZ608, AO722-BZ699, AO722-BZ816, AO722-BZ848, and AO722-
0611), Aspire X1 models (including AX1420G-U5832), Aspire X3 models (including AX3400-
U4032), Aspire models (including S4250-BZ637, AS5250-BZ641, AS5250-BZ853, AS5250-
BZ873, AS5253-BZ480, AS5253-BZ656, AS5253-BZ659, AS5253-BZ660, AS5253-BZ684,
AS5253-BZ819, AS5253-BZ873, AS5253-BZ893, AS5552-3452, AS5552-3891, AS5552-3857,
AS5552-5898, AS5552-7474, AS5552-7650, AS5552-7803, AS5552G-7632, AS5552G-7641,
AS5560-SB609, AS5560-SB653, AS5560-SB835, AS5560G-SB485, AS7551-7422, AS7551-
7471, AS7551G-7606, AS7552G-5430, and AS7552G-6436), Gateway NV models (including
NV50A02u, NV53A82u, NV53A88u, NV55S02u, NV55S04u, NV55S13u, NV55S15u,
NV75S02u, and NV75S17u), Gateway ZX models (including ZX4351-UR20P), ICONIA Tab
W series models (including W500-BZ467 and W500P-BZ841), Revo 100 models (including
RL100-U1002), and Veriton X models (including VX2110-UA260W, VX2110-BU260W, and
VX2110-US150W).
39. Acer has also indirectly infringed, and continues to indirectly infringe, the 613Patent. Acer has had knowledge of the 613 Patent and its infringement since March 30, 2011
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
10/24
10
through a letter sent by Round Rock Research concerning that infringement. In addition, Acer
has had knowledge of the 613 Patent and its infringement thereof since the original Complaint
was filed in Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00977-RGA on October 14, 2011. Acers customers
directly infringe the 613 Patent by making, using, selling, and/or offering for sale 613
Infringing Products in the United States.
40. Acer actively, knowingly, and intentionally induced, and continues to actively,knowingly, and intentionally induce, infringement of the 613 Patent by making, using, offering
for sale, and selling 613 Infringing Products, as well as by contracting with others to use,
market, sell, and offer to sell 613 Infringing Products, all with knowledge of the 613 Patent and
its claims; with knowledge that its customers will use, market, sell, and offer to sell 613
Infringing Products; and with the knowledge and intent to encourage and facilitate those
infringing sales and uses of 613 Infringing Products through the creation and dissemination of
promotional and marketing materials, instructional materials, product manuals, and technical
materials related to 613 Infringing Products.
41. Acer has also contributed to the infringement by others (e.g., Acers customersand the users of 613 Infringing Products), and continues to contribute to infringement by others,
by selling, offering to sell, or importing 613 Infringing Products containing DDR memory in the
United States, knowing those systems to constitute a material part of the inventions of the 613
Patent, knowing those systems to be especially made or adapted to infringe the 613 Patent, and
knowing that those systems are not staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for
substantial non-infringing use.
42. Acer directly and/or indirectly has infringed, and continues to infringe, at leastclaims 16, 17, 19, and 21 of the 613 Patent.
43. Round Rock Research has been and continues to be damaged by Acersinfringement of the 613 Patent.
44. Acer has willfully infringed, and continues to willfully infringe, the 613 Patentdespite having received notice of its infringement from Round Rock Research.
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
11/24
11
COUNT IV
Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,845,053
45. Paragraphs 1-44 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein.46. Acer has infringed, and continues to infringe, the 053 Patent under 35 U.S.C.
271, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, directly and/or indirectly, by
making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing into the United States infringing
products containing embedded multimediacard flash memory, (053 Infringing Products),
including at least ICONIA tablet computers (including ICONIA-6120, ICONIA Tab A models
(including A100-07u08u, A100-07u08w, A100-07u16u, A100-10S16u, A500-10S32u, and
A500-10S16w) and ICONIA Tab W models (including W500-BZ467 and W500P-BZ841)).
47. Acer has also indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the 053Patent. Acer has had knowledge of the 053 Patent and its infringement since December 5, 2011
through a letter sent by Round Rock Research concerning that infringement. In addition, Acer
has had knowledge of the 053 Patent and its infringement thereof since the Amended Complaint
was filed in Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00977-RGA on December 6, 2011. Acers customers
directly infringe the 053 Patent by making, using, selling, and/or offering for sale 053
Infringing Products in the United States.
48. Acer actively, knowingly, and intentionally induced, and continues to actively,knowingly, and intentionally induce, infringement of the 053 Patent by making, using, offering
for sale, and selling 053 Infringing Products, as well as by contracting with others to use,
market, sell, and offer to sell 053 Infringing Products, all with knowledge of the 053 Patent and
its claims; with knowledge that its customers will use, market, sell, and offer to sell 053
Infringing Products; and with the knowledge and intent to encourage and facilitate those
infringing sales and uses of 053 Infringing Products through the creation and dissemination of
promotional and marketing materials, instructional materials, product manuals, and technical
materials related to 053 Infringing Products.
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
12/24
12
49. Acer has also contributed to the infringement by others (e.g., Acers customersand the users of 053 Infringing Products), and continues to contribute to infringement by others,
by selling, offering to sell, or importing 053 Infringing Products in the United States, knowing
those systems to constitute a material part of the inventions of the 053 Patent, knowing those
systems to be especially made or adapted to infringe the 053 Patent, and knowing that those
systems are not staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for substantial non-
infringing use.
50. Acer directly and/or indirectly has infringed, and continues to infringe, at leastclaims 1, 2, 3, and 24 of the 053 Patent.
51. Round Rock Research has been and continues to be damaged by Acersinfringement of the 053 Patent.
52. Acer has willfully infringed, and continues to willfully infringe, the 053 Patentdespite having received notice of its infringement from Round Rock Research.
COUNT V
Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,138,823
53. Paragraphs 1-52 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein.54. Acer has infringed, and continues to infringe, the 823 Patent under 35 U.S.C.
271, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, directly and/or indirectly, by
making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing into the United States infringing
products containing DDR3 memory, (823 Infringing Products), including at least the
following products: All in One Z3 models (including AZ3101-U4062, AZ3731-UR21P, and
AZ3171-UR30P), All in One Z5 models (including AZ5700-U4002 and AZ5761-UR20P),
Aspire M3 models (including AM3400-B4052, AM3400-U4132, AM3410-UR21P, AM3410-
UR22P, AM3900-U4002, AM3910-U4122, and AM3970-U5022), Aspire One 520 models
(including AO522-BZ465, AO522-BZ824, and AO522-BZ897), Aspire One 721 models
(including AO721-3620), Aspire One 722 models (including AO722-BZ197, AO722-BZ454,
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
13/24
13
AO722-BZ480, AO722-BZ608, AO722-BZ699, AO722-BZ816, AO722-BZ848, and AO722-
0611), Aspire One D255 models (including AOD255E-1482, AOD255E-2659, AOD255E-
2677, AOD255E-12111, AOD255E-12281, AOD255E-13410, AOD255E-13429, AOD255E-
13444, AOD255E-13471, AOD255E-13492, AOD255E-13493, AOD255E-13608, AOD255E-
13611, AOD255E-13617, AOD255E-13633, AOD255E-13648, AOD255E-13670, AOD255E-
13681, AOD255E-13695, AOD255E-13699, AOD255E-13813, AOD255E-13849, AOD255E-
13865, and AOD255E-13877 and excluding AOD255E-2659 and AOD255E-2677), Aspire One
D257 models (including AOD257-1411, AOD257-1437, AOD257-1471, AOD257-1486,
AOD257-1648, AOD257-1802, AOD257-1806, AOD257-13404, AOD257-13450, AOD257-
13472, AOD257-13478, AOD257-13652, AOD257-13685, AOD257-13836, and AOD257-
13876), Aspire One D260 models (including AOD260-1270), Aspire One Happy 2 Models
(including AOHAPPY2-1499, AOHAPPY2-1612, AOHAPPY2-1828, AOHAPPY2-1872,
AOHAPPY2-13445, AOHAPPY2-13647, AOHAPPY2-13666, and AOHAPPY2-13875),
Aspire TimelineX models (including AS1830T-6478, AS3820T-6480, AS4820T-6447,
AS4820T-6645, AS4820TG-6847, and AS5820T-6401), Aspire X1 models (including
AX1420G-U5832, AX1920-UR20P, and AX1920-UR21P), Aspire X3 Models (including
AX3400-U4032 and AX3960-U4102), Aspire models (including S4250-BZ637, AS5250-
BZ641, AS5250-BZ853, AS5250-BZ873, AS5253-BZ480, AS5253-BZ656, AS5253-BZ659,
AS5253-BZ660, AS5253-BZ684, AS5253-BZ819, AS5253-BZ873, AS5253-BZ893, AS5552-
3452, AS5552-3891, AS5552-3857, AS5552-5898, AS5552-7474, AS5552-7650, AS5552-7803,
AS5552G-7632, AS5552G-7641, AS5560-SB609, AS5560-SB653, AS5560-SB835, AS5560G-
SB485, AS7551-7422, AS7551-7471, AS7551G-7606, AS7552G-5430, and AS7552G-6436),
Gateway ID series models (including ID47H03u, ID47H06u, ID47H07u, and ID57H03u),
Gateway LT series models (including LT2802u, LT2805u, and LT2811u), Gateway NV series
models (including NV50A02u, NV53A82u, NV53A88u, NV55C48u, NV55S02u, NV55S04u,
NV55S13u, NV55S15u, NV57H22u, NV57H43uNV57H45u, NV57H46u, NV57H48u,
NV57H50um NV59C72u, NV59C73u, NV75S02u, NV75S17u, and NV77H05u), Gateway One
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
14/24
14
ZX series models (including ZX4351-UR20P, ZX4971-UR30P, ZX6961-UB20P, ZX6961-
UB21P, ZX6961-UR20P, ZX6971-UB30P, ZX6971-UB31P, ZX6971-UR30P, and ZX6971-
UR31P), Iconia Tab W models (including W500-BZ467 and W500P-BZ841), ICONIA models
(including ICONIA-6120), NEW Aspire Ethos models (including AS5951G-9694 and
AS8951G-9600), NEW Aspire TimelineX models (including AS3830T-6417, AS4830T-6642,
AS5830TG-6402, and AS3830TG-6431), Predator G3 models (including AG3600-U4082u and
AG3610-UR20P), Predator G7 models (including AG7750-UR22P), Revo 100 models
(including RL100-U10002), TravelMate TimelineX models (including TM6495T-6813,
TN6595T-6896, TM8172T-6812, TM6473T-6484, TM8473T-6450, TM8481T-6440, TM8573T-
6497, TM8573T-6834, and TM8573T-6853), TravelMate models (including TM4750-6458,
TM8172-6932, TM4750-6867, TM5760-6477, TM5760-6662, and TM5760-6816), Veriton L
models (including VL480G-UD5800W, VL480G-UD7601W, VL480G-UD8401W, VL4610G-
Ui3210W, and VL4610G-Ui5240W), Veriton M models (including VM275-UD6701W,
VM275-US7601W, VM4618G-Ui3210W, and VM4618G-Ui5240W) Veriton N models
(including VN281G-UA425W, VN282G-UD525W, and VN281G-UA425L), Veriton S models
(including VS480G-UQ8300W), Veriton X models (including VX2110-UA260W, VX2110-
BU260W, VX2110-US150W, VX4618G-Ui3210W, VX4618G-Ui5240W, VX488G-UQ8401W,
VX4618G-Ui7260W, VX275-UD6701W, VX275-UD5800W, and VX275-UD7601W), and
Veriton Z models (including VZ290G-UD5252W and VZ431G-Ui5650W).
55. Acer has also indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the 823Patent. Acer has had knowledge of the 823 Patent and its infringement since October 3, 2011
through a letter sent by Round Rock Research concerning that infringement. In addition, Acer
has had knowledge of the 823 Patent and its infringement thereof since the original Complaint
was filed in Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00977-RGA on October 14, 2011. Acers customers
directly infringe the 823 Patent by making, using, selling, and/or offering for sale 823
Infringing Products in the United States.
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
15/24
15
56. Acer actively, knowingly, and intentionally induced, and continues to actively,knowingly, and intentionally induce, infringement of the 823 Patent by making, using, offering
for sale, and selling 823 Infringing Products, as well as by contracting with others to use,
market, sell, and offer to sell 823 Infringing Products, all with knowledge of the 823 Patent and
its claims; with knowledge that its customers will use, market, sell, and offer to sell 823
Infringing Products; and with the knowledge and intent to encourage and facilitate those
infringing sales and uses of 823 Infringing Products through the creation and dissemination of
promotional and marketing materials, instructional materials, product manuals, and technical
materials related to 823 Infringing Products.
57. Acer has also contributed to the infringement by others (e.g., Acers customersand the users of 823 Infringing Products), and continues to contribute to infringement by others,
by selling, offering to sell, or importing 823 Infringing Products in the United States, knowing
those systems to constitute a material part of the inventions of the 823 Patent, knowing those
systems to be especially made or adapted to infringe the 823 Patent, and knowing that those
systems are not staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for substantial non-
infringing use.
58. Acer directly and/or indirectly has infringed, and continues to infringe, at leastclaims 37, 38, and 40 of the 823 Patent.
59. Round Rock Research has been and continues to be damaged by Acersinfringement of the 823 Patent.
60. Acer has willfully infringed, and continues to willfully infringe, the 823 Patentdespite having received notice of its infringement from Round Rock Research.
COUNT VI
Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,285,979
61. Paragraphs 1-60 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein.62. Acer has infringed, and continues to infringe, the 979 Patent under 35 U.S.C.
271, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, directly and/or indirectly, by
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
16/24
16
making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing into the United States infringing
products containing DDR3 memory (979 Infringing Products) including at least All in One Z3
models (including AZ3101-U4062, AZ3731-UR21P, AZ3171-UR30P), All in One Z5 models
(including AZ5700-U4002 and AZ5761-UR20P), Aspire M3 models (including AM3400-
B4052, AM3400-U4132, AM3410-UR21P, AM3410-UR22P, AM3900-U4002, AM3910-
U4122, and AM3970-U5022), Aspire One 520 models (including AO522-BZ465, AO522-
BZ824, and AO522-BZ897), Aspire One 721 models (AO721-3620), Aspire One 722 models
(including AO722-BZ197, AO722-BZ454, AO722-BZ480, AO722-BZ608, AO722-BZ699,
AO722-BZ816, AO722-BZ848, and AO722-0611), Aspire One D255 models (including
AOD255E-1482, AOD255E-2659, AOD255E-2677, AOD255E-12111, AOD255E-12281,
AOD255E-13410, AOD255E-13429, AOD255E-13444, AOD255E-13471, AOD255E-13492,
AOD255E-13493, AOD255E-13608, AOD255E-13611, AOD255E-13617, AOD255E-13633,
AOD255E-13648, AOD255E-13670, AOD255E-13681, AOD255E-13695, AOD255E-13699,
AOD255E-13813, AOD255E-13849, AOD255E-13865, and AOD255E-13877 and excluding
AOD255E-2659 and AOD255E-2677), Aspire One D257 models (including AOD257-1411,
AOD257-1437, AOD257-1471, AOD257-1486, AOD257-1648, AOD257-1802, AOD257-1806,
AOD257-13404, AOD257-13450, AOD257-13472, AOD257-13478, AOD257-13652, AOD257-
13685, AOD257-13836, and AOD257-13876), Aspire One D260 models (including AOD260-
1270), Aspire One Happy 2 Models (including AOHAPPY2-1499, AOHAPPY2-1612,
AOHAPPY2-1828, AOHAPPY2-1872, AOHAPPY2-13445, AOHAPPY2-13647, AOHAPPY2-
13666, and AOHAPPY2-13875), Aspire TimelineX models (including AS1830T-6478,
AS3820T-6480, AS4820T-6447, AS4820T-6645, AS4820TG-6847, and AS5820T-6401),
Aspire X1 models (including AX1420G-U5832, AX1920-UR20P, and AX1920-UR21P),
Aspire X3 Models (including AX3400-U4032 and AX3960-U4102), Aspire models (including
S4250-BZ637, AS5250-BZ641, AS5250-BZ853, AS5250-BZ873, AS5253-BZ480, AS5253-
BZ656, AS5253-BZ659, AS5253-BZ660, AS5253-BZ684, AS5253-BZ819, AS5253-BZ873,
AS5253-BZ893, AS5552-3452, AS5552-3891, AS5552-3857, AS5552-5898, AS5552-7474,
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
17/24
17
AS5552-7650, AS5552-7803, AS5552G-7632, AS5552G-7641, AS5560-SB609, AS5560-
SB653, AS5560-SB835, AS5560G-SB485, AS7551-7422, AS7551-7471, AS7551G-7606,
AS7552G-5430, and AS7552G-6436), Gateway ID series models (including ID47H03u,
ID47H06u, ID47H07u, and ID57H03u), Gateway LT series models (including LT2802u,
LT2805u, and LT2811u), Gateway NV series models (including NV50A02u, NV53A82u,
NV53A88u, NV55C48u, NV55S02u, NV55S04u, NV55S13u, NV55S15u, NV57H22u,
NV57H43uNV57H45u, NV57H46u, NV57H48u, NV57H50um NV59C72u, NV59C73u,
NV75S02u, NV75S17u, and NV77H05u), Gateway One ZX series models (including ZX4351-
UR20P, ZX4971-UR30P, ZX6961-UB20P, ZX6961-UB21P, ZX6961-UR20P, ZX6971-UB30P,
ZX6971-UB31P, ZX6971-UR30P, and ZX6971-UR31P), Iconia Tab W models (including
W500-BZ467 and W500P-BZ841), ICONIA models (including ICONIA-6120), NEWAspire
Ethos models (including AS5951G-9694 and AS8951G-9600), NEW Aspire TimelineX
models (including AS3830T-6417, AS4830T-6642, AS5830TG-6402, and AS3830TG-6431),
Predator G3 models (including AG3600-U4082u and AG3610-UR20P), Predator G7 models
(including AG7750-UR22P), Revo 100 models (including RL100-U10002), TravelMate
TimelineX models (including TM6495T-6813, TN6595T-6896, TM8172T-6812, TM6473T-
6484, TM8473T-6450, TM8481T-6440, TM8573T-6497, TM8573T-6834, and TM8573T-6853),
TravelMate models (including TM4750-6458, TM8172-6932, TM4750-6867, TM5760-6477,
TM5760-6662, and TM5760-6816), Veriton L models (including VL480G-UD5800W,
VL480G-UD7601W, VL480G-UD8401W, VL4610G-Ui3210W, and VL4610G-Ui5240W),
Veriton M models (including VM275-UD6701W, VM275-US7601W, VM4618G-Ui3210W,
and VM4618G-Ui5240W), Veriton N models (including VN281G-UA425W, VN282G-
UD525W, and VN281G-UA425L), Veriton S models (including VS480G-UQ8300W), Veriton
X models (including VX2110-UA260W, VX2110-BU260W, VX2110-US150W, VX4618G-
Ui3210W, VX4618G-Ui5240W, VX488G-UQ8401W, VX4618G-Ui7260W, VX275-
UD6701W, VX275-UD5800W, and VX275-UD7601W), and Veriton Z models (including
VZ290G-UD5252W and VZ431G-Ui5650W).
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
18/24
18
63. Acer has also indirectly infringed, and continues to indirectly infringe, the 979Patent. Acer has had knowledge of the 979 Patent and its infringement since March 30, 2011
through a letter sent by Round Rock Research concerning that infringement. In addition, Acer
has had knowledge of the 979 Patent and its infringement thereof since the original Complaint
was filed in Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00977-RGA on October 14, 2011. Acers customers
directly infringe the 979 Patent by making, using, selling, and/or offering for sale 979
Infringing Products.
64. Acer actively, knowingly, and intentionally induced, and continues to actively,knowingly, and intentionally induce, infringement of the 979 Patent by making, using, offering
for sale, and selling 979 Infringing Products, as well as by contracting with others to use,
market, sell, and offer to sell 979 Infringing Products, all with knowledge of the 979 Patent and
its claims; with knowledge that its customers will use, market, sell, and offer to sell the 979
Infringing Products; and with the knowledge and intent to encourage and facilitate those
infringing sales and uses of 979 Infringing Products through the creation and dissemination of
promotional and marketing materials, instructional materials, product manuals, and technical
materials related to 979 Infringing Products.
65. Acer has also contributed to the infringement by others (e.g., Acers customersand the users of 979 Infringing Products), and continues to contribute to infringement by others,
by selling, offering to sell, or importing 979 Infringing Products in the United States, knowing
those systems to constitute a material part of the inventions of the 979 Patent, knowing those
systems to be especially made or adapted to infringe the 979 Patent, and knowing that those
systems are not staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for substantial non-
infringing use.
66. Acer directly and/or indirectly has infringed, and continues to infringe, at leastclaims 33, 34, and 36 of the 979 Patent.
67. Round Rock Research has been and continues to be damaged by Acersinfringement of the 979 Patent.
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
19/24
19
68. Acer has willfully infringed, and continues to willfully infringe, the 979 Patentdespite having received notice of its infringement from Round Rock Research.
COUNT VII
Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,336,531
69. Paragraphs 1-68 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein.70. Acer has infringed, and continues to infringe, the 531 Patent under 35 U.S.C.
271, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, directly and/or indirectly, by
making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing into the United States infringing
products containing solid state drives, (531 Infringing Products), including at least the Acer
AC700 and the ICONIA tablet computers (including at least the ICONIA-6120, ICONIA Tab A
models (including A100-07u08u, A100-07u08w, A100-07u16u, A100-10S16u, A500-10S32u,
and A500-10S16w) and ICONIA Tab W models (including W500-BZ467 and W500P-BZ841)).
71. Acer has also indirectly infringed, and continues to indirectly infringe, the 531Patent. Acer has had knowledge of the 531 Patent and its infringement since December 5, 2011
through a letter sent by Round Rock Research concerning that infringement. In addition, Acer
has had knowledge of the 531 Patent and its infringement thereof since the amended Complaint
was filed in Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00977-RGA on December 6, 2011.
72. Acer actively, knowingly, and intentionally induced, and continues to actively,knowingly, and intentionally induce, infringement of the 531 Patent by making, using, offering
for sale, and selling 531 Infringing Products, as well as by contracting with others to use,
market, sell, and offer to sell 531 Infringing Products, all with knowledge of the 531 Patent and
its claims; with knowledge that its customers will use, market, sell, and offer to sell 531
Infringing Products; and with the knowledge and intent to encourage and facilitate those
infringing sales and uses of 531 Infringing Products through the creation and dissemination of
promotional and marketing materials, instructional materials, product manuals, and technical
materials related to 531 Infringing Products.
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
20/24
20
73. Acer has also contributed to the infringement by others (e.g., Acers customersand the users of 531 Infringing Products), and continues to contribute to infringement by others,
by selling, offering to sell, or importing 531 Infringing Products in the United States, knowing
those systems to constitute a material part of the inventions of the 531 Patent, knowing those
systems to be especially made or adapted to infringe the 531 Patent, and knowing that those
systems are not staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for substantial non-
infringing use.
74. Acer directly and/or indirectly has infringed, and continues to infringe, at leastclaims 7 and 10 of the 531 Patent.
75. Round Rock Research has been and continues to be damaged by Acersinfringement of the 531 Patent.
76. Acer has willfully infringed, and continues to willfully infringe, the 531 Patentdespite having received notice of its infringement from Round Rock Research.
COUNT VIII
Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,389,369
77. Paragraphs 1-76 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein.78. Acer has infringed, and continues to infringe, the 369 Patent under 35 U.S.C.
271, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, directly and/or indirectly, by
making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing into the United States infringing
products containing DDR2 or DDR3 memory, (369 Infringing Products), including at least
All in One Z3 models (including AZ3101-U4062 and AZ3171-UR30P), Aspire M3 models
(including AM3400-B4052, AM3400-U4132, AM3410-UR21P, and AM3410-UR22P), Aspire
One 522 models (including AO522-BZ465, AO522-BZ824, and AO522-BZ897), Aspire One
721 models (including AO721-3620), Aspire One 722 models (including AO722-BZ197,
AO722-BZ454, AO722-BZ480, AO722-BZ608, AO722-BZ699, AO722-BZ816, AO722-
BZ848, and AO722-0611), Aspire X1 models (including AX1420G-U5832), Aspire X3 models
(including AX3400-U4032), Aspire models (including S4250-BZ637, AS5250-BZ641,
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
21/24
21
AS5250-BZ853, AS5250-BZ873, AS5253-BZ480, AS5253-BZ656, AS5253-BZ659, AS5253-
BZ660, AS5253-BZ684, AS5253-BZ819, AS5253-BZ873, AS5253-BZ893, AS5552-3452,
AS5552-3891, AS5552-3857, AS5552-5898, AS5552-7474, AS5552-7650, AS5552-7803,
AS5552G-7632, AS5552G-7641, AS5560-SB609, AS5560-SB653, AS5560-SB835, AS5560G-
SB485, AS7551-7422, AS7551-7471, AS7551G-7606, AS7552G-5430, and AS7552G-6436),
Gateway NV models (including NV50A02u, NV53A82u, NV53A88u, NV55S02u, NV55S04u,
NV55S13u, NV55S15u, NV75S02u, and NV75S17u), Gateway ZX models (including ZX4351-
UR20P), ICONIA Tab W series models (including W500-BZ467 and W500P-BZ841), Revo
100 models (including RL100-U1002), and Veriton X models (including VX2110-UA260W,
VX2110-BU260W, and VX2110-US150W).
79. Acer has also indirectly infringed, and continues to indirectly infringe, the 369Patent. Acer has had knowledge of the 369 Patent and its infringement since at least June 9,
2011 through a presentation made by Round Rock Research concerning that infringement. In
addition, Acer has had knowledge of the 369 Patent and its infringement thereof since the
original Complaint was filed in Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00977-RGA on October 14, 2011.
80. Acer actively, knowingly, and intentionally induced, and continues to actively,knowingly, and intentionally induce, infringement of the 369 Patent by making, using, offering
for sale, and selling 369 Infringing Products, as well as by contracting with others to use,
market, sell, and offer to sell 369 Infringing Products, all with knowledge of the 369 Patent and
its claims; with knowledge that its customers will use, market, sell, and offer to sell 369
Infringing Products; and with the knowledge and intent to encourage and facilitate those
infringing sales and uses of 369 Infringing Products through the creation and dissemination of
promotional and marketing materials, instructional materials, product manuals, and technical
materials related to 369 Infringing Products.
81. Acer has also contributed to the infringement by others (e.g., Acers customersand the users of 369 Infringing Products), and continues to contribute to infringement by others,
by selling, offering to sell, or importing 369 Infringing Products in the United States, knowing
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
22/24
22
those systems to constitute a material part of the inventions of the 369 Patent, knowing those
systems to be especially made or adapted to infringe the 369 Patent, and knowing that those
systems are not staple articles or commodities of commerce suitable for substantial non-
infringing use.
82. Acer directly and/or indirectly has infringed, and continues to infringe, at leastclaims 8, 10, 14, and 16 of the 369 Patent.
83. Round Rock Research has been and continues to be damaged by Acersinfringement of the 369 Patent.
84. Acer has willfully infringed, and continues to willfully infringe, the 369 Patentdespite having received notice of its infringement from Round Rock Research.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Wherefore, Plaintiff Round Rock Research respectfully requests that this Court enter
judgment against the Acer Defendants as follows:
a) adjudging that the Defendants have infringed, induced infringement of, and/orcontributorily infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, U.S. Patent No. 5,787,174;
b) adjudging that the Defendants have infringed, induced infringement of, and/orcontributorily infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, U.S. Patent No. 5,991,843;
c) adjudging that the Defendants have infringed, induced infringement of, and/orcontributorily infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, U.S. Patent No. 6,002,613;
d) adjudging that the Defendants have infringed, induced infringement of, and/orcontributorily infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, U.S. Patent No. 6,845,053;
e) adjudging that the Defendants have infringed, induced infringement of, and/orcontributorily infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, U.S. Patent No. 7,138,823;
f) adjudging that the Defendants have infringed, induced infringement of, and/orcontributorily infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, U.S. Patent No. 7,285,979;
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
23/24
23
g) adjudging that the Defendants have infringed, induced infringement of, and/orcontributorily infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, U.S. Patent No. 7,336,531;
h) adjudging that the Defendants have infringed, induced infringement of, and/orcontributorily infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, U.S. Patent No. 7,389,369;
i) adjudging that the Defendants infringement has been willful;j) awarding Round Rock Research the damages to which it is entitled under 35
U.S.C. 284 for Defendants past infringement and any continuing or future infringement up
until the date Defendants are finally and permanently enjoined from further infringement,
including both compensatory damages and enhanced/treble damages for willful infringement,
and ordering a full accounting of same;
k) finding that this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. 285;l) awarding Round Rock Research pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on its
damages; and
m) awarding Round Rock Research such other and further relief in law or equity thatthe Court deems just and proper.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Round Rock Research hereby demands a trial by jury on all claims and issues so triable.
-
7/30/2019 Round Rock Research v. Acer et. al.
24/24
24
Dated: August 27, 2013
Of Counsel:
Paul A. Bondor
Jonas R. McDavit
Lauren M. NowierskiEdward Terchunian
DESMARAIS LLP230 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10169(212) 351-3400
(212) 351-3401
[email protected]@desmaraisllp.com
FARNAN LLP
/s/ Brian E. Farnan
Brian E. Farnan (Bar No. 4089)
Michael J. Farnan (Bar No. 5165)
919 North Market Street12th
Floor
Wilmington, DE 19801
(302) 777-0300(302) 777-0301
Counsel for Plaintiff