role of radiotherapy · role of radiotherapy • approximately 50% of all cancer patients ... p.r....

13
Role of Radiotherapy Approximately 50% of all cancer patients require radiotherapy as part of their disease management An attractive treatment option for older patients, especially where surgery or chemotherapy pose too great a risk Radical versus Palliative versus Prophylactic versus Abscopal

Upload: others

Post on 22-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Role of Radiotherapy

    • Approximately 50% of all cancer patients

    require radiotherapy as part of their disease

    management

    • An attractive treatment option for older

    patients, especially where surgery or

    chemotherapy pose too great a risk

    • Radical versus Palliative versus Prophylactic

    versus Abscopal

  • Questions to Ask for Older Patients

    • Will this patient be able to tolerate a course of

    radiotherapy and associated toxicity?

    • Or is a more palliative approach suitable?

    • Are there alternative treatment schedules that might be

    more suitable for an older patient?

    • Is every possible attempt being made to reduce toxicity?

    • Will the patient be able to attend radiotherapy every day?

    • Does the patient have adequate support?

    • Does the patient have capacity to consent to treatment?

    • What are the patient’s wishes if treatment will result in

    functional decline?

  • The Importance of Patient Wishes

    Fried, T.R., et al., Understanding the Treatment Preferences of Seriously Ill Patients. New England Journal of

    Medicine, 2002. 346(14): p. 1061-1066.

  • Case Study: Rectal Cancer

  • Why use Radiotherapy?

    • Reduce the risk of local recurrence

    – Involvement of the circumferential margin

    – Lymph node status

    – Extramural venous invasion

    • Neoadjuvant

    – Induce tumour response prior to Surgery (Sx)

    – Increase the chances of sphincter sparing Sx: *not supported by evidence

    – Potentially less small bowel toxicity as bowel adhesions more common

    after Sx

    – Surgically naïve tissue is better oxygenated…..therefore more responsive

    to radiotherapy

    � But not proven to increase survival*Bujko, Krzysztof, et al. Does rectal cancer shrinkage induced by preoperative radio (chemo) therapy increase the

    likelihood of anterior resection? A systematic review of randomised trials. Radiotherapy and oncology 2006; 80: 4-12

  • Long Course vs Short Course RT

    Long Course

    • 45-50.4Gy in 25-28 fractions

    delivered in 5 days/week, one

    fraction/day

    • 1.8 Gy/#

    • Trend toward increased pCR with

    higher doses. A statistically

    significant increase in LRFS, DFS,

    and OS was seen with radiation

    doses of 46 and greater, but there

    was no difference between 46 Gy

    and 50 Gy. 2Gy/#

    Short Course

    25Gy in 5 fractions delivered in 1

    week

    • 5 Gy/#

    Wiltshire et al. Preoperative radiation with concurrent chemotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: Effect of dose escalation on pathologic

    complete response, local recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival

    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2006; 64 (3):709-716

  • Case Study: Prostate Cancer

  • Hypofractionation: Less is More

    • CHHiP (Conventional or Hypofractionated High-dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer) (Lancet Oncol 2016;17[8]:1047-1060, PMID: 27339115),

    • NRG Oncology 0415 trial (J ClinOncol 2016;34[20]:2325-2330, PMID: 27044935)

    • Ontario Clinical Oncology Group/Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial, PROFIT (PROstateFractionated Irradiation Trial) (J Clin Oncol 2017 Mar 15. [Epub ahead of print], PMID: 28296582).

    4/5 weeks versus 7/8 weeks

  • Case Study: Head and Neck Cancer

  • CGA in Older H&N RT Patients

    • Deterioration during

    treatment supports

    continuous assessment

    • Screening tools are no

    substitute for full CGA

    • CGA deficits closely

    associated with HRQOL

    Pottel, L., Lycke, M., Boterberg, T., Pottel, H., Goethals, L., Duprez, F., Van Den Noortgate, N., De Neve, W., Rottey, S., Geldhof, K., Buyse, V.,

    Kargar-Samani, K., Ghekiere, V. and Debruyne, P.R. (2014), Serial comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly head and neck cancer patients

    undergoing curative radiotherapy identifies evolution of multidimensional health problems and is indicative of quality of life. European Journal of

    Cancer Care, 23: 401–412. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12179

  • Key Questions to Ask the RO

    • Is this the only radiotherapeutic option for this patient?

    • Is a different fractionation schedule possible/feasible/effective?

    • What is the anticipated toxicity of treatment?

    • What efforts can be made to reduce toxicity and manage pre-existing concerns?

    • What supportive care options will the patient have access to during radiotherapy and during follow-up?

  • Role of CGA

  • An Integrated Approach

    “broader than a restricted definition of technical

    maintenance and quality control of equipment and

    treatment delivery ….should encompass a comprehensive

    approach to all activities in the radiotherapy department

    from the moment a patient enters it until the moment they

    leave, and also continuing into the follow-up period”(ESTRO,

    1998)

    “Quality geriatric care has been defined as aging-sensitive, evidence-based, individualised care that

    promotes informed decision-making and is continuous across settings” (Barba, 2012)