risk management: helping rice farmers cope with risk
DESCRIPTION
Risk Management: Helping Rice Farmers Cope with Risk. Sumiter Singh Broca, Policy Officer, ESP Group 2 nd ERAG Consultation on Formulation of a Rice Strategy for Asia Bangkok 28-29 Nov 2013. Risks facing smallholder farmers in Asia. Food security is under threat from: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Sumiter Singh Broca,Policy Officer, ESP Group
2nd ERAG Consultation on Formulation of a Rice Strategy for Asia
Bangkok28-29 Nov 2013
Risk Management: Helping Rice Farmers Cope with Risk
• Food security is under threat from:– Population growth and demographic changes– Changes in food preferences with rising
incomes– Instability in international markets
• High and volatile prices – Land degradation and water constraints– Climate change and natural disasters
2
Risks facing smallholder farmers in Asia
• Definition: “Risks are undesirable fluctuations in consumption that are not perfectly predictable.” (Sinha & Lipton)
• The key to determining who bears risk is finding out who will suffer a loss if something bad happens
3
What is risk?
4
• Poor, rural households face price/market related risks and non market-related risks:1. Price/market related risks:
a. Price shocks2. Non market-related risks:
a. Crop damage from weather or pests / diseaseb. Death of livestockc. Illness or death of household membersd. Loss of employment or self-employment e. Natural calamities (drought, flood, fire etc.)f. War and other forms of violence, e.g. crime
Typology of risks
• Households can respond with a variety of strategies: try to keep income/consumption stable over time– Perhaps at low levels– Risk management strategies seek to minimize
fluctuations in income itself– Risk coping strategies try to keep consumption
stable in the face of income fluctuations
5
Strategies to deal with risk
6
• Risk management strategies• Diversification of income sources• Negative correlation between incomes from
different source• Examples:
a.Crop and field diversificationb.Diversification of income sourcesc.Contractual arrangements e.g. sharecropping etcd.Adoption of hardier varieties
• Risk coping strategies• Insurance (crop, livestock, weather, health, life)• Savings and credit• Social protection / charity
Strategies to deal with risk (cont’d)
• In practice two sets of strategies cannot be neatly separted
• Key point: consumption can be (somewhat) stabilized, but only by accepting low return in exchange for low risk– Wealthy households: can choose more risky
strategies and can therefore earn higher returns. – Poor households: forced to choose production
technologies that are less risky but earn lower returns• Key point: Therefore policies to help poor rural
households manage and cope with risk are also anti-poverty strategies.
7
Risk concepts (cont’d)
• Some issues– Moral hazard: People may build houses in
flood plains because it’s cheaper. Know that politicians will come to the rescue if house is washed away
– Measuring risk: How to decide whether one household faces “more” risk than another, i.e. how to measure extent of risk faced by a household.
8
Risk concepts (cont’d)
9
• “Vulnerability is the likelihood that at a given time in the future, an individual will have a level of welfare below some norm or benchmark.” Hoddinott and Quisumbing (2003)
• The time horizon and welfare measure must be specified for the concept to be well defined
• Can be defined at the individual or household level or even community
Vulnerability
• Vulnerability can be defined as:– Expected poverty (i.e. probability that
someone will fall into poverty in the near future)
– Low expected utility– Uninsured exposure to risk
10
Measuring vulnerability
11
• Pandey, Bhandari and Hardy (2007):– Rice farmers in E India, SE Thailand and S
China– Larger impact on farmers’ incomes in aggregate
in India, less so in Thailand and China– Household level impacts were quite severe in all
3 regions– Eastern India:
• Household incomes 24-58 % less in drought years, despite partial compensation from nonfarm income
• Coping mechanisms: sale of assets, dipping into savings, borrowing
Example: drought and rice farmers
12
• Farm households were unable to: – Keep income reasonably stable– Keep food and other consumption reasonably
stable• Reduced number of meals and amount eaten• Even dipped into seed reserves in many cases
• Incidence of poverty increased • More vulnerable groups included:
– Small farm size– Farms in drought prone upland areas– Fewer working age family members
Example: drought and rice farmers
13
• Conclusion: Evidence indicates serious impact of risk on poverty and malnutrition in rice farming households in at least some parts of Asia:– Risk management and coping strategies require
resources which smallholders lack by definition– Therefore cannot protect themselves to the
desired extent
Example: drought and rice farmers
14
• Policies to help farmers implement these strategies are required– Agricultural research– Better technology design– Water resource development
• Drought analysis and mapping• Drought relief and long-term mitigation• Drough forecasting and preparedness
– Social protection– Crop insurance
Example: drought and rice farmers
15
• Does not eliminate risk but pools it• Spreads risk across an industry or economy and
through time• Can help households and governments manage
natural hazards• More efficient than credit and savings if financial
market is little developed• Reduces credit default risk• Facilitates adoption of production innovations
Example of risk management: agricultural insurance
16
Example of risk management: agricultural insurance
• Conditions for successful insurance - Statistical independence- Symmetric information- Calculable expected frequency/magnitude of
loss- Determinable and measurable losses- Significant potential losses and interest to
insure - Limited policyholder control over insured
event (moral hazard)- Affordable premiums
17
• Impediments to insurance– High administrative cost – Mismatch between preferences and
willingness to pay– Inadequate legal/regulatory framework– Distorted incentives– Thin international reinsurance market for
some kinds of insurance
Example of risk management: agricultural insurance
18
• Lending to Agriculture– High systemic, market and credit risks– Slow return on rural investments– Low profitability of small-holder agriculture – Inability to offer guarantees due to low levels of
assets – High cost due to geographical dispersion of
clients– Insufficient knowledge about agriculture – Political interference
Example of risk management: agricultural insurance
19
•Traditional Insurance Products–Single (named) peril–Multiple peril
Actual physical loss or damage is measured in-field, and the claim is specific to that field/farmer
Example of risk management: agricultural insurance
20
•Innovative insurance products– Crop area yield index insurance– Crop weather index insurance– Livestock mortality index insuranceThe claim is calculated based on an external index designed to reflect as accurately as possible the loss incurred by the farmer
–Crop revenue insuranceProtects insured parties from the consequences of low yields, low prices or a combination of both
Example of risk management: agricultural insurance
21
•Conclusions– Insurance can only be implemented if insurance companies perceive profitable commercial opportunity to exploit in the medium term
–Farmers must perceive that the premiums and expected benefits offers additional value
– Insurance will be financially viable without the full support of re-insurers
Example of risk management: agricultural insurance
22
• Conclusions (continued)
– Essential to promote better on-farm risk management and risk coping strategies
– Understand farmer risk attitudes better
– Blend insurance with other financial products
Example of risk management: agricultural insurance
23
THANK YOU
24
Specific objectives• Review of available evidence on types of risks faced
by smallholder rice farming households in Asia• Analysis of impact on incomes / welfare of these
households.• Analysis of risk coping strategies available to and
adopted by these households and their dependence on socio-economic variables.
• Analysis of the effectiveness of these strategies, together with a review of alternative strategies.
• Based on above, recommendations for public policy measures to help these households cope more effectively with risk.