risk aversion and capital allocation to risky assets

17
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets P.V. VISWANATH FOR A FIRST COURSE IN INVESTMENTS

Upload: inez

Post on 26-Feb-2016

78 views

Category:

Documents


21 download

DESCRIPTION

Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets. P.V. Viswanath For a First Course in INvestments. Learning Goals. How do we characterize individuals’ preferences for taking risk? How do we use utility functions over asset returns? How do we evaluate investors’ risk preferences? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

P. V. V I S WA NAT H

F OR A F I R S T C O U R S E I N I NV E S T M E N TS

Page 2: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

2

Learning GoalsHow do we characterize individuals’

preferences for taking risk?How do we use utility functions over asset

returns?How do we evaluate investors’ risk

preferences?How do we allocate capital across risky and

risk-free portfolios?

Page 3: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

3

Individual Risk Preferences

Individuals have differing preferences for risk. Therefore, what is a desirable set of investments for one individual may not be desirable for another. A utility function is a convenient way of describing individual’s preferences for risk.

In economics, a utility function is described over quantities of goods. That works when we know the consumption of a good with precision.

However, if we are to describe preferences over what are called lotteries, i.e. uncertain quantities of goods, then we use a concept invented by von Neumann, called Expected Utility, which can be used provided individuals’ preferences satisfy some basic conditions, such as transitivity, i.e. if an individual prefers a choice A to B and B to C, then he must prefer A to C.

Page 4: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

4

Utility functions over asset returnsIn order not to have to worry about how

individuals choose combinations of goods, often in finance, we use what is called a derived utility function.

Even though individuals actually consume goods, nevertheless because wealth can be used to acquire goods, it is possible to define a utility function for wealth, conditional on the prices of goods.

Similarly, conditional on initial wealth, it is possible to define a utility function on rates of return.

Page 5: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

5

Utility functions over asset returnsThere are many such utility functions. Different utility functions

have different properties. One such property is called constant relative risk aversion, which establishes a certain stability of risk preferences.

This utility function is written as U(r) = E(r) – 0.5As(r)The constant risk aversion parameter is called A; higher values of A

represent a preference for less risk and r is measured in decimals.Note that the factor 0.5 is written as 0.005 if r is written in

percentages rather than in decimals, as in the text.The utility score can also be used as a certainty equivalent rate of

return.That is, if the investor is indifferent between two portfolios, one

with an uncertain return of r0 and another with a certain return of r1, thenU(r0) = E(r0) – 0.5As2(r0) = U(r1) = E(r1) = r1

Page 6: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

6

Mean Variance Utility functions

The utility function U is a good way of describing investors’ preferences under two conditions – one that return distributions are normal (i.e. that only mean and standard deviation of returns are necessary to describe the distribution) – or – that investor preferences are quadratic.

While some individuals might have approximately quadratic utility functions, it still represents a strong restriction on individual preferences.

We know now (particularly post the 2008 mortgage crisis) that return distributions probably are not normal. Hence we must be careful in using our utility function.

However, it still represents a very powerful way of describing risk preferences and we can derive a lot of useful results with that assumption.

Page 7: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

7

Evaluating Investors’ Risk Preferences

Investment Advisors might find it useful to associate investors with utility functions.

If we decide that a mean-variance utility function is appropriate, then what we need for this is to figure out the investor’s A-number.

One way to do this is by using questionnaires, asking investors which one of a pair of investment choices they would prefer.

This can then be used to construct indifference curves and finally these indifference curves can be used to figure out the investor’s A value.

Alternatively, we could observe individuals’ decisions when confronted with risk

Finally, we could observe how much people are willing to pay to avoid risk

Page 8: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

8

Basic Asset AllocationWe start with a top-down allocation, first.Assuming we know the mean and variance of

the risky part of the investor’s portfolio, we compute the proportion of the portfolio that would go into the risky part and the riskless part, respectively. Let y=portion allocated to the risky portfolio,

P (1-y)=portion to be invested in risk-free asset,

F.Assume the following data:

rf = 7% srf = 0%E(rp) = 15% sp = 22%

Page 9: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

9

The Investment Opportunity Set

Page 10: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

10

The Opportunity Set with Differential Borrowing and Lending Rates

Page 11: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

Risk Tolerance and Asset AllocationThe investor must choose one

optimal portfolio, C, from the set of feasible choicesExpected return of the complete

portfolio:

Variance:( ) ( )c f P fE r r y E r r

2 2 2C Pys s

Page 12: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

Utility Levels for Various Positions in Risky Assets (y) for an Investor with Risk Aversion A

= 4

Note that there is an optimal value of y, which can be seen graphically in the next slide.

Page 13: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

Utility as a Function of Allocation to the Risky Asset, y

Page 14: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

Indifference Curves for U = .05 and U = .09 with A = 2 and A = 4

Page 15: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

Finding the Optimal Complete Portfolio Using Indifference Curves

Page 16: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

Risk Tolerance and Asset AllocationThe investor must choose one optimal

portfolio, C, from the set of feasible choicesExpected return of the complete portfolio:

Variance:Substituting these expressions into the

utility function and maximizing, we find

In our example, this works out to (0.15-0.07)/(4*0.222)= 41.32%, for A=4

( ) ( )c f P fE r r y E r r 2 2 2C Pys s

𝑦 ∗=𝐸 (𝑟𝑃 )−𝑟 𝑓

𝐴𝜎 𝑃2

Page 17: Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

Passive Strategies: The Capital Market Line

How would we pick the risky portfolio?One option is to use a passive strategy. The passive

strategy avoids any direct or indirect security analysis

Supply and demand forces may make such a strategy a reasonable choice for many investors

A natural candidate for a passively held risky asset would be a well-diversified portfolio of common stocks such as the S&P 500.

The capital market line (CML) is the capital allocation line formed from 1-month T-bills and a broad index of common stocks (e.g. the S&P 500).