revised cohort definitions
DESCRIPTION
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 Supplemental Packet. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Graduation Rates:Students Who Started 9th Grade
in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008Supplemental Packet
![Page 2: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Federal regulations require states to report graduation rates using a new federal cohort definition
1. Under New York’s “old” cohort definition, students who have been enrolled in a school or district for fewer than five months are not counted in the cohort for graduation rate reporting purposes. The new federal definition includes in the cohort any student who has been enrolled one day or longer.
2. Under the old cohort definition, students who are incarcerated are considered “transfers” and are not included in the cohort for graduation rate reporting purposes. The new federal cohort definition will count incarcerated youth as transfers only if the student attends a program offering courses that can result in the earning of credit toward a high school diploma. Incarcerated youth who do not attend these types of programs count as dropouts.
3. Under the old cohort definition, ungraded students with disabilities are counted in a cohort based on the school year in which they reach age 17. The new federal cohort definition requires that all students be counted in a cohort based upon the year in which they first entered a ninth grade program.
Revised Cohort Definitions
![Page 3: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Revised Cohort Definitions• These revised cohort definitions apply to the 2008
cohort results after 4 years, 2007 cohort results after 4 and 5 years, and the 2006 cohort results after 5 and 6 years.
• These rules now apply to all school districts, including Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers.
• Aggregations for New York City (city-wide results), Need/Resource Capacity categories (N/RC), and other statewide aggregations (e.g., race/ethnicity, etc.) have always used the “one-day” enrollment rule. 3
![Page 4: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs) were calculated based on the total number of students in the 2008 and 2007 cohorts as of June 2012 and 2011, respectively (including students who dropped out or transferred to an approved GED program).
Graduation rate is the percentage of these students who graduated with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma.
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation requires 22 units of credit, passing 7 to 9 Regents examinations with 65 or above, and advanced course sequences in languages other than English, CTE, or the arts.
ELA/Math APM is the percentage of these students who graduated with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma and scored*:• 75 or higher on the English Regents examination, and• 80 or higher on a mathematics Regents examination* Or who achieved the minimum score accepted by the Department on an approved alternative to a Regents examination (see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/apda/hsgen/archive/list.pdf).
Aspirational Performance Measures - Definitions
![Page 5: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
55
IEP Diploma, 1.3%
Still Enrolled, 15.2%
Transferred to GED Program, 1.0%
Dropped Out, 8.4%
Graduated, 74.0%
Statewide, 74.0% of students who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by June 2012, while 15.2% of students were still enrolled.
2008 Total Cohort Students = 221,366
All Students in Public Schools
![Page 6: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
66
IEP Diploma1.2%
Still Enrolled12.5%
Transferred to GED Program
1.0%Dropped Out8.4%
Graduated76.7%
Statewide, 76.7% of students who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by August 2012, while 12.5% were still enrolled.
2008 Total Cohort Students = 221,366
All Students in Public Schools
![Page 7: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
77
50.0
% 65.1
% 77.4
%
84.8
%
74.0
%
93.9
%
60.4
%
64.7
%
53.5
% 69.3
% 78.8
%
86.5
%
76.7
%
94.7
%
New York City Large City Urban-Suburban
Rural Average Low Total Public
2008 Cohort through June 2008 Cohort through August
For students who entered 9th grade in 2008, inclusion of August 2012 graduates increased the statewide graduation rate by more than 2 percentage points
compared to the June 2012 rate Statewide, 6,096 students earned diplomas in August 2012.
![Page 8: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
88
Statewide the percentage of graduates earning a Regents, Advanced Regents, or Local Diploma
43.4% 41.8% 42.0% 41.4% 40.4% 40.2% 38.8% 39.2% 38.6% 39.4%
40.3% 43.7% 45.4% 48.8%40.4% 43.8% 45.5% 49.2%
40.2% 43.6% 45.4%
16.2% 19.4% 17.5% 15.3% 12.2%
38.1% 38.5%
54.7%
16.1%18.4%20.3%14.5% 12.6% 9.8% 4.9%
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
Four Years Five Years Six Years
![Page 9: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
999
Statewide
78.9
%
78.3
%
79.7
%
73.4
%
79.2
%
80.9
%
80.0
%
74.0
%
70.9
%
77.4
%
71.8
%
74.0
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Statewide Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma Results Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 223,726
2005 224,822
2006 224,744
2007 223,285
2008 221,366
![Page 10: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
101010
New York City
69.2
%
67.8
%
70.9
%
61.0
% 69.4
%
73.2
%
60.9
% 70.2
%
60.4
%
56.4
% 66.1
%
59.0
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Chort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 75,009
2005 77,378
2006 78,346
2007 79,476
2008 79,719
![Page 11: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
111111
57.0
%
61.7
%
62.6
%
47.4
%
52.1
%
53.0
%
54.0
%
58.0
%
46.8
% 55.5
%
51.8
%
53.1
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Buffalo
Cohort Membership
2004 3,083
2005 2,248
2006 3,479
2007 2,653
2008 2,948
Because of a one-time change in 8th grade promotion policy, the 2005 and 2006 total cohort enrollments in Buffalo are significantly smaller and larger, respectively, than earlier cohorts. Cohort size decreased again for the 2007 Cohort.
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
* *
* These cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
* * *
![Page 12: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
121212
59.6
%
50.6
%
53.6
%
46.1
% 54.7
%
58.0
%
45.5
% 54.0
%
43.4
%
48.4
% 57.1
%
42.1
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Rochester
Cohort Membership
2004 2,220
2005 2,924
2006 2,670
2007 2,873
2008 2,564
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
* These cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
* *** *
![Page 13: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
131313
58.7
%
54.2
%
56.3
%
45.9
% 53.9
%
55.9
%
48.4
% 56.4
%
48.0
% 56.2
%
47.3
%
45.2
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Syracuse
Cohort Membership
2004 1,506
2005 1,528
2006 1,571
2007 1,673
2008 1,547
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
* These cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
* ** * *
![Page 14: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
141414
68.1
%
66.7
%
68.0
%
63.2
% 71.2
%
72.2
%
66.2
% 74.4
%
66.0
%
58.1
% 67.4
%
58.1
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Yonkers
Cohort Membership
2004 1,831
2005 2,072
2006 1,673
2007 1,858
2008 1,814
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
* These cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
* ** * *
![Page 15: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
151515
The graduation rate for Black students
67.1
%
65.3
%
68.2
%
57.7
% 66.8
%
70.2
%
58.4
% 68.0
%
58.1
%
54.2
% 64.0
%
55.7
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 42,590
2005 43,837
2006 44,615
2007 44,072
2008 42,982
![Page 16: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
161616
The graduation rate for Hispanic students
65.8
%
65.0
%
67.9
%
57.3
% 66.2
%
69.8
%
58.0
% 67.7
%
57.8
%
62.7
%
52.2
%
54.8
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 40,498
2005 42,635
2006 43,349
2007 45,455
2008 46,337
![Page 17: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
171717
The graduation rate of students with disabilities
51.9
%
50.4
%
52.7
%
44.1
% 50.1
%
53.3
%
44.6
% 52.1
%
44.7
%
49.5
%
41.5
%
42.1
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 31,252
2005 32,058
2006 32,696
2007 32,917
2008 33,833
![Page 18: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
181818
The graduation rate for ELL students
53.5
%
51.7
% 55.5
%
51.7
% 56.7
%
38.2
%
51.6
%
34.3
%
35.7
%
49.2
%
38.6
%
40.3
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 10,057
2005 11,265
2006 11,635
2007 12,236
2008 11,986
![Page 19: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
1919
The Graduation Rate for Black Students
9.2% 9.5% 9.5% 9.0% 9.3% 9.6% 9.7% 9.4% 9.7%
30.9% 34.0%38.9%
44.7%34.3% 37.7%
43.6%35.1%
38.9%
15.6%14.1%
10.0%4.4% 21.7%
19.5%14.7%
23.8%21.6%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
Four Years Five Years Six Years
58.4%
66.8%68.2%
55.7%57.7%
65.3%
The percentage of Black students in the cohort earning a Local, Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Cohort Membership
2005 43,837
2006 44,615
2007 44,072
2008 42,982
58.1%
68.0%70.2%
![Page 20: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
2020
The Graduation Rate for Hispanic Students
11.3% 11.7% 11.9% 12.1% 11.5% 11.7% 12.1% 11.5% 11.8%
28.8%33.2%
37.3%42.4%
32.8%37.0%
42.4%33.8%
38.5%
14.8%12.4%
8.8%3.3% 20.7%
17.5%13.2%
22.6%19.4%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
Four Years Five Years Six Years
58.0%
66.2% 67.9%
54.8%57.3%
65.0%
The percentage of Hispanic students in the cohort earning a Local, Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Cohort Membership
2005 42,635
2006 43,349
2007 45,455
2008 46,337
57.8%
67.7%69.8%
![Page 21: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
2121
The Graduation Rate for English Language Learners
5.9% 6.1% 5.2% 5.6% 6.6% 6.5% 6.7% 6.7%
15.9%20.2% 22.8%
25.2%19.6%
23.8%28.7%
20.6%25.6%
16.9%14.1% 10.3% 3.5%
25.5%21.4%
17.2%28.2%
24.4%
5.7%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
Four Years Five Years Six Years
38.2%
51.7%
55.5%
38.6% 40.3%
51.7%
The percentage of English Language Learner cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Cohort Membership
2005 11,265
2006 11,635
2007 12,236
2008 11,986
34.3%
51.6%
56.7%
![Page 22: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
2222
The Graduation Rate for Students with Disabilities
3.0% 3.1% 3.1% 3.0% 3.2% 3.1% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2%
19.1% 20.2% 21.3% 22.8% 21.2% 21.4% 23.2% 21.7% 22.2%
20.0% 20.8% 20.2% 18.9%26.1% 25.6%
25.6% 27.8% 27.9%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
Four Years Five Years Six Years
44.6%
50.1%52.7%
42.1%44.1%
50.4%
The percentage of cohort members who are Students with Disabilities earning a Local, Regents or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Cohort Membership
2005 32,058
2006 32,696
2007 32,917
2008 33,833
44.7%
52.1%53.3%
![Page 23: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
232323
57.2
% 64.7
%
43.3
%
47.2
% 56.0
%
Charters
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma After 4 Years
Results Through June, All Students
The Graduation Rate for Charter Schools
These rates are based on small cohort sizes. The student count of the charter schools cohort has increased to 1,628 for 2008 cohort.
![Page 24: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
242424
64.7
%
7.9% 12
.7%
Charter Schools
Graduation Rate Regents with Adv Designation ELA/Math APM
All Students After 4 Years
Results Through June
Aspirational Performance Measures (APMs) as a percentage of the cohort compared to the Graduation Rate percentage for students
who started 9th grade in 2008 for Charter Schools
There are only 1,628 students in the Charter School cohort.
![Page 25: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Statewide Achievement Gap Data
![Page 26: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
2626
Graduation rates by credential awarded, All Public Schools
10% 12%
43%
10% 12%
43%
9% 12%
42%
34% 33%
34%
39% 37%
36%
45% 42%
40%
14% 12%
7%
10% 9%
6%
4% 3%
4%
Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
2006 2007 2008
57.7% 58.4%
85.1%
57.3%
84.1%
58.0%
the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
58.1% 57.8%
85.7%
![Page 27: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
2727
Big 4 District graduation rates by credential awarded
3% 5%
13%
5% 8%
18%
4% 6%
15%
25%27%
32%
31%32%
36%
37%
41%
42%17%17%
12%
12%
13%
10%
5%
4%
4%
Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
2006 2007 2008
45.6%48.3%
63.5%
48.1%
57.1%52.9%
the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
45.9%
50.2%
61.6%
![Page 28: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
2828
Buffalo graduation rates by credential awarded
1% 1%
9%5%
9%
19%
4% 3%
15%
27% 26%
37%
35%23%
35%
36%
29%
43%17%12%
13%
12%
11%
9%
5%
4%
4%
Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
2006 2007 2008
44.6%
52.4%
64.0%
39.6%
58.3%
43.7%
the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
44.1%
35.1%
62.7%
![Page 29: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
2929
Rochester graduation rates by credential awarded
5% 5%
19%
4% 5%
15%
5% 4%
18%
25% 24%
26%
30% 29%
37%
34%31%
36%15%
13%
11%
10% 11%
6%
5%
3%
4%
Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
2006 2007 2008
45.0% 43.9%
58.5%
42.4%
56.1%
43.9%
the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
43.4%
38.1%
57.8%
![Page 30: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
3030
Syracuse graduation rates by credential awarded
4% 4%
15%
4% 6%
13%
3%7%
13%
21%15%
25%
27%19%
33%
36%35%
38%20%
14%
11%
16%
9%
11%
7% 4%
3%
Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
2006 2007 2008
44.3%46.7%
57.1%
32.3%
51.6%
34.3%
the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years
The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.
46.4% 45.5%
53.7%
![Page 31: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
3131
Yonkers graduation rates by credential awarded
5% 7%14%
7% 9%
22%
4% 8%17%
30%33%
42%
34%
40%
44%
50%
54%
54%23%
22%
13%
15%
16%
11%
6%
4%
5%
Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
2006 2007 2008
58.6% 56.0%
77.6%
62.1%
70.0%65.5%
the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation, selected racial ethnic groups after 4 years
59.3%65.0%
75.1%
![Page 32: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
3232
27
33
3
-8
2831
5
-7
26
34
0
-7
27
1
-6
27
34
-3 -4
27
31
-1-3
28
33
-5
-1
2830
-3
0
32
GraduationRate
Regents AdvDesignation
RegentsDiploma
LocalDiploma
GraduationRate
Regents AdvDesignation
RegentsDiploma
LocalDiploma
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap
Black v. White Hispanic v. White
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
![Page 33: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
3333
20
25
1
-6
22 23
4
-6
20
24
1
-5
22 23
3
-4
20
25
-1
-4
22 23
1
-3
20
25
-4
-1
22 23
0 0
GraduationRate
RegentsAdv Desig
RegentsDiploma
LocalDiploma
GraduationRate
RegentsAdv Desig
RegentsDiploma
LocalDiploma
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in New York City
Black v. White Hispanic v. White
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
The graduation rate and credentials earned achievement gap in New York City is generally similar to the statewide trend.
![Page 34: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
3434
911
3
-5
18
10
-4
14
710
-4
19
8
1
1214
0
-3
20
10
-2
19
12
8
-1
28
1215
1
1110
12
GraduationRate
RegentsAdv Desig
RegentsDiploma
LocalDiploma
GraduationRate
RegentsAdv Desig
RegentsDiploma
LocalDiploma
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Buffalo City School District
Black v. White Hispanic v. White
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma.
![Page 35: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
3535
9
14
6
-10
1113
4
11
14
1
-4
14 14
2
15
11
7
-3
15
11
8
14 13
20
20
14
5
1
-5
-2
-4
GraduationRate
Regents AdvDesig
RegentsDiploma
Local Diploma GraduationRate
Regents AdvDesig
RegentsDiploma
Local Diploma
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Rochester City School
District
Black v. White Hispanic v. White
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma.
![Page 36: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
3636
8
13
9
-14
23
1512
7
11
4
-8
19
11 1010 10
6
-5
23
8
14
710
2
-4
86
3
-1
-4-2
2
GraduationRate
Regents AdvDesig
RegentsDiploma
Local Diploma GraduationRate
Regents AdvDesig
RegentsDiploma
Local Diploma
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Syracuse City School
District
Black v. White Hispanic v. White
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma.
![Page 37: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
3737
16
6
12
-2
13
69
-2
119
12
-10
8 8 9
-9
22
16
10
-4
12 13
4
-5
16
12
4
-1
10 9
0 1
GraduationRate
Regents AdvDesig
RegentsDiploma
Local Diploma GraduationRate
Regents AdvDesig
RegentsDiploma
Local Diploma
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Yonkers City School District
Black v. White Hispanic v. White
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students
As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma.
![Page 38: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
3838
20
12
9 9 8
27
20
11
14
11
7
11
26
20
15
12
15
10
22
27
20
16
19
14
7
16
28
16
NYC Big 4* Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap between Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Graduating after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)
Big 4* = Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers combined.
![Page 39: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
3939
22
10
18
11
23
28
22
9
19
14
19
8
27
22
11
20
15
23
12
27
22
11
28
20
810
28
13
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Graduating after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)
The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap between Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
![Page 40: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
4040
25
11 1114 13
33
24
97
1411
9
34
25
13 1411 10
16
34
25
11 12 1310
12
33
6
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)
Regents with Advanced Designation Diplomas - the gaps between Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and
Statewide
![Page 41: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
4141
23
10 10
1315
31
23
8 8
14
11
8
32
23
10 10 11
8
13
31
23
9
1214
6
9
30
6
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)
Regents with Advanced Designation Diplomas - the gaps between Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4,
and Statewide
![Page 42: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
4242
1
9
3
6
9
3
1
7
10
1
4
12
0
-1
5
0
76
10
-3-4
6
8
2 2
4
-5
12
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students)
Regents Diplomas - the gap between Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide
![Page 43: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
4343
4
7
11
4
12
23
5
10
2
109
11
4
12
8
14
4
-1
0
2
15
5
3
0
-2
9
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)
Regents Diplomas - the gaps between Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide.
![Page 44: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
4444
6
8
5
10
14
8
5 54 4
8
10
7
43 3 3
54 4
-1 -1 -1
0
-4
-1 -1
2
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Local Diploma after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was higher than for White Students)
When comparing Local Diplomas, the gap between Black and White students in NYC and the Big 4 are smaller than
the gap found Statewide.
![Page 45: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
4545
67
45
4
7
4 4
-1
2 2
9
6
34
2
4
-2
5
3
01 1 1
-1
10
2
NYC Big 4 Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Local Diploma after Four Years
(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was higher than for White StudentsNegative values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students)
When comparing Local Diplomas, the gap between Hispanic and White students in the Big 5 are smaller than
the gap found Statewide.
![Page 46: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
4646
3533 33
3640
ELL
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Achievement Gap in Percentage Between English Language Learners and All Students Graduating with Regents or Local
Diploma After Four Years Percentage Point Difference for Graduates in the Cohorts
through June
![Page 47: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
4747
29 30 29 29 29
SWD
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Achievement Gap in Percentage Between Students with Disabilities and All Students Graduating with Regents or Local
Diploma After Four Years Percentage Point Difference for Graduates in the Cohorts
through June
![Page 48: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
NYC and Big Four* City School Districts
*2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007 and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a
school or the district
![Page 49: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
4949
50.3
%
70.9
%
61.0
%
52.8
%
74.0
%
60.4
%
50.0
%
52.8
%
71.8
%
48.2
%56.4
%
73.4
%
49.0
%59.0
%
74.0
%
New York City Large City Districts* Total Public
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage of NYC’s and Large City Districts’ Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4 Years
Results of Graduates in the Cohorts through June
* Large City Districts include: Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers
![Page 50: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
5050
51.8
%
48.4
%
47.3
%
58.1
%
60.9
%
54.0
%
45.5
%
48.4
%
66.2
% 74.0
%
60.4
%
46.8
%
48.0
%
66.0
% 70.9
%
56.4
%59
.0%
53.1
%
42.1
%
45.2
%
58.1
%
71.8
%
61.0
%
47.4
%
46.1
%
45.9
%
63.2
%
73.4
%
43.4
%
74.0
%
New York City Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage of NYC and Big Four Cities’ Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years
Results of Graduates in the Cohorts through June
![Page 51: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
5151
60.4%
46.8% 48.0%47.8% 48.6% 51.1%
72.1%76.7%
66.0%
43.4%
74.0%
64.7%
New York City Buffalo Rochester Syracuse Yonkers Total Public
2008 Cohort 2008 Cohort August
Percentage of NYC and Big Four Cities’ Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years
Results of Graduates in the 2008 Cohortthrough June and August
![Page 52: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
5252
7.0%3.2%
9.5%6.2% 7.0%
3.1%9.5% 7.0%
3.2%
35.6%
29.3%
33.5%36.2%
39.6%
31.2%
35.5% 40.1%
31.5%
10.5%
14.9%
11.1%4.4%
15.1%
17.8%
13.0%15.5%
18.4%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma Four Years Five Years Six Years
54.0% 52.1%
62.6%
53.1%
47.4%
61.7%
Buffalo City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Cohort Membership
2005 2,248
2006 3,479
2007 2,653
2008 2,948
46.8%
58.0%
53.0%
* 2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
![Page 53: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
5353
5.8% 6.8% 5.8% 6.1% 5.8% 6.9% 6.0% 5.8% 7.0%
19.5%24.9% 30.1% 33.2%
21.4%28.2% 34.2%
22.1%29.6%
16.8%
14.4% 9.6% 4.1%23.4%
19.5%13.8%
25.7%
21.5%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
Four Years Five Years Six Years
45.5%
54.7% 53.6%
42.1%46.1%
50.6%
Rochester City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Cohort Membership
2005 2,924
2006 2,670
2007 2,873
2008 2,564
43.4%
54.0%58.0%
* 2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007 and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
![Page 54: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
5454
7.8% 7.5% 7.5% 7.2% 8.1% 7.5% 7.7% 8.3% 7.7%
21.5% 22.3%27.8%
35.6%
24.0% 23.7%
30.6%24.4% 24.2%
15.9% 16.1%
13.2%5.2%
22.1% 22.7%
18.1%23.6% 24.0%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
Four Years Five Years Six Years
48.4%
53.9%56.3%
45.2% 45.9%
54.2%
Syracuse City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Cohort Membership
2005 1,528
2006 1,571
2007 1,673
2008 1,547
48.0%
56.4% 55.9%
* 2006 5-year and 2007 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
![Page 55: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
5555
6.7% 8.2%12.4% 8.9% 6.7% 8.2%
12.5%6.7% 8.2%
31.7%34.7%
39.3%53.0%
34.3%36.1%
42.9%
34.4%36.1%
19.7%20.3%
14.4%4.2%
25.6%26.8%
19.0%
26.8%27.9%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2005 2006
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma Four Years Five Years Six Years
66.2%
71.2%68.0%
58.1%
63.2%66.7%
Yonkers City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma
Cohort Membership
2005 2,072
2006 1,673
2007 1,858
2008 1,814
66.0%
74.4%72.2%
* 2006 and 2007 5-year and 2007 and 2008 4-year cohorts include students enrolled for at least one day in a school or the district
![Page 56: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Graduation Rates by Need/Resource Group
For Four, Five and Six Years
![Page 57: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
5757
New York City
69.2
%
67.8
%
70.9
0%
61.0
% 69.4
%
73.2
%
60.9
% 70.2
%
60.4
%
56.4
% 66.1
%
59.0
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 75,009
2005 77,378
2006 78,346
2007 79,476
2008 79,719
![Page 58: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
5858
Large City Districts
59.0
%
56.7
%
58.6
%
49.0
% 56.5
%
58.3
%
52.8
% 59.8
%
50.0
% 57.2
%
50.3
%48
.2%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 8,863
2005 8,983
2006 9,536
2007 9,057
2008 8,873
![Page 59: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
5959
High Need Urban-Suburban Districts
72.1
%
71.7
%
72.9
%
64.5
% 72.0
%
73.6
%
64.5
% 72.3
%
65.1
%
70.5
%
61.7
%63
.0%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 16,739
2005 16,964
2006 16,666
2007 16,517
2008 16,037
![Page 60: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
6060
High Need Rural Districts
78.0
%
78.8
%
79.3
%
75.4
%
79.5
%
79.0
%
76.1
%
80.3
%
77.4
%
77.5
%
73.3
%74
.2%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 14,898
2005 14,758
2006 14,262
2007 14,135
2008 13,501
![Page 61: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
6161
Average Need Districts
85.8
%
86.1
%
83.0
%
87.1
%
87.6
%
84.4
%
88.1
%
84.8
%
85.3
%
80.4
%
86.5
%
81.0
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 73,488
2005 72,316
2006 71,230
2007 69,517
2008 68,042
![Page 62: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
6262
Low Need Districts
95.1
%
95.1
%
95.5
%
93.3
%
95.4
%
95.9
%
93.5
%
95.7
%
93.9
%
94.8
%
92.1
%92
.1%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 33,930
2005 33,616
2006 33,693
2007 33,468
2008 33,566
![Page 63: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
6363
Districts Outside New York City
83.9
%
83.8
%
84.5
%
80.1
%
84.4
%
85.1
%
81.2
%
85.4
%
81.6
%
78.2
%
83.2
%
78.6
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 148,717
2005 147,444
2006 146,398
2007 143,809
2008 141,647
![Page 64: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
6464
IEP Diploma, 1.2%Still Enrolled, 9.3%
Transferred to GED Program, 1.0%
Dropped Out, 6.7%
Graduated, 81.6%
In the districts outside of NYC, 81.6% of students who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by June 2012, while 9.3% of students were still enrolled.
2008 Total Cohort Students = 141,647
All Students in Public Schools outside of NYC
![Page 65: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
65
Results for Students by
Race/Ethnicity and Gender
65
![Page 66: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
66
Cohort Memberships by Race/Ethnicity and Gender2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 Cohorts
All Students2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
American Indian / Alaskan Native Female
428 507 505 570 559
American Indian / Alaskan Native Male
473 473 573 558 577
Asian Female 7573 7757 7900 8185 8,735
Asian Male 8279 8305 8584 9129 9,498
Black Female 21375 22004 22369 21860 21,374
Black Male 21215 21833 22246 22212 21,608
Hispanic Female 20068 20881 21509 22374 22,490
Hispanic Male 20430 21754 21840 23081 23,847
White Female 60015 58874 57465 55335 54,381
White Male 63545 62029 61279 59396 57,467
![Page 67: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
6767
Graduation Rate by Race/Ethnicity
56.5
%
78.4
%
54.2
%
52.2
%
82.0
%
70.9
%
56.3
%
80.4
%
55.7
%
54.8
%
82.7
%
71.8
%
59.1
%
82.6
%
57.7
%
57.3
%
84.1
%
73.4
%
59.6
%
82.4
%
58.4
%
58.0
%
85.1
%
74.0
%
58.5
%
81.6
%
58.1
%
57.8
%
85.7
%
74.0
%
American Indian /Alaska Native
Asian Black Hispanic White All Students
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four YearsThrough June
![Page 68: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
6868
Graduation Rate by Race/Ethnicity
58.5
%
81.6
%
58.1
%
57.8
%
85.7
%
74.0
%
61.7
%
84.1
%
62.6
%
62.3
%
87.1
%
76.7
%
American Indian /Alaska Native
Asian Black Hispanic White All Students
2008 Cohort 2008 Cohort Through August
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma in the 2008 Cohort After Four Years Through June and August
![Page 69: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
6969
IEP Diploma, 2.4%
Still Enrolled, 23.9%
Transferred to GED Program, 1.5%
Dropped Out, 13.5%
Graduated, 58.5%
American Indian Students Who Started 9th Gradein 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012
2008 Total Cohort Students = 1,136
![Page 70: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
7070
Asian Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012
2008 Total Cohort Students = 18,233
IEP Diploma, 0.4%
Graduated, 81.6%
Dropped Out, 5.1%
Still Enrolled, 12.7%
Transferred to GED Program, 0.2%
![Page 71: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
7171
IEP Diploma, 1.9%
Still Enrolled, 26.0%
Transferred to GED Program, 1.2%
Dropped Out, 12.6%
Graduated, 58.1%
Black Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012
2008 Total Cohort Students = 42,982
![Page 72: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
7272
IEP Diploma, 1.5%
Still Enrolled, 25.8%
Transferred to GED Program, 1.1%
Dropped Out, 13.6%
Graduated, 57.8%
Hispanic Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012
2008 Total Cohort Students = 46,337
![Page 73: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
7373
IEP Diploma, 1.1%
Still Enrolled, 6.9%
Transferred to GED Program, 1.0%
Dropped Out, 5.2%
Graduated, 85.7%
White Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008, Results After Four Years
June 2012
2008 Total Cohort Students = 111,848
![Page 74: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
7474
Graduation Rate by Gender and Race/Ethnicity
83.9
%
61.3
%
58.1
%
85.5
%
75.5
%
61.7
%
85.2
%
61.9
%
60.9
%
86.3
%
76.4
%
64.6
%
87.0
%
64.0
%
63.0
%
87.4
%
77.7
%
62.3
%
86.7
%
64.3
%
63.2
%
88.2
%
78.0
%
62.4
%
85.6
%
63.8
%
62.1
%
88.7
%
77.8
%
49.5
%
73.5
%
47.0
%
46.4
%
78.7
%
66.5
%
50.5
%
76.0
%
49.4
%
49.1
%
79.3
%
67.4
%
54.3
%
78.5
%
51.2
%
51.7
%
81.1
%
69.4
%
56.8
%
78.6
%
52.6
%
53.0
%
82.3
%
70.2
%
54.6
%
78.0
%
52.6
%
53.7
%
82.8
%
70.3
%
64.3
%
American Indian /Alaska Native
Asian Black Hispanic White All Students
Females 2004 Cohort Females 2005 Cohort Females 2006 Cohort Females 2007 Cohort Females 2008 Cohort
Males 2004 Cohort Males 2005 Cohort Males 2006 Cohort Males 2007 Cohort Males 2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Through June
Solid colors: FemalesStripes: Males
![Page 75: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
75
Graduation rates through August 2012 vs. June 2012.
Percentage of Students Who Started 9th Grade in 2008 and Graduated with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years through June and August 2012
AsianAmerican Indian / Alaska Native
HispanicBlack
White
Solid colors: Females
Stripes: Males
Blue – August 2012Red – June 2012
![Page 76: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
7676
Cohort Graduation Rates After Four, Five, and Six Years for American Indian Students.
64.9
%
65.6
%
67.1
%
59.1
%
64.0
%
65.7
%
59.6
% 67.2
%
58.5
%
56.5
% 63.2
%
56.3
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 980
2006 1,078
2007 1,128
2008 1,136
![Page 77: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
7777
Cohort Graduation Rates After Four, Five, and Six Years Results for Asian Students.
87.2
%
87.1
%
88.6
%
87.9
%
89.7
%
82.4
%
81.6
%
85.6
%
78.4
%
80.4
%
82.6
%
88.1
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 15,852
2005 16,062
2006 16,484
2007 17,314
2008 18,233
![Page 78: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
7878
Cohort Graduation Rates After Four, Five, and Six Years Results for White Students
86.4
%
86.6
%
87.1
%
84.1
%
87.5
%
87.9
%
85.1
%
88.3
%
82.0
%
85.9
%
82.7
%
85.7
%
Four Years Five Years Six Years
2004 Cohort2005 Cohort2006 Cohort2007 Cohort2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 YearsResults Through June
Cohort Membership
2004 123,560
2005 120,903
2006 118,744
2007 114,731
2008 111,848
![Page 79: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
79
Results for
Students with Disabilities
79
![Page 80: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
8080
IEP Diploma, 8.2%
Still Enrolled, 29.5%
Transferred to GED Program, 1.7%
Dropped Out, 15.6%
Graduated, 44.7%
44.7% of students with disabilities statewide who started 9th grade in 2008 graduated by June 2012, while 29.5% were still enrolled.
2008 Total Cohort Students = 33,833
![Page 81: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
8181
26.3
% 35.1
%
36.9
%
51.8
%
41.5
%46.2
%
44.7
%
75.0
%
22.5
%24
.7%
23.0
%
36.9
%
38.8
%
53.0
%
42.1
%
73.8
%
27.9
%
25.0
%
39.4
%
40.7
%
55.8
%
75.3
%
44.1
%
27.2
%
28.2
%
39.0
% 46.2
%
57.0
%
75.6
%
44.6
%
58.8
%
25.8
%
27.6
%
40.4
%
74.8
%
New York City Large City Urban-Suburban
Rural Average Low Total Public
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma
After Four Years Through June
Four-year graduation rates for students with disabilities by Need/Resource
Capacity
![Page 82: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
82
Results for English Language Learners
82
![Page 83: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
8383
IEP Diploma, 2.4%
Still Enrolled, 40.7%
Transferred to GED Program, 1.1%
Dropped Out, 21.3%
Graduated, 34.3%
Statewide, 34.3% of ELL students who started 9th grade in 2008 had graduated by June 2012, while 40.7% were still enrolled and 21.3% had dropped
out.
2008 Total Cohort Students = 11,986
![Page 84: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
8484
42.1
%
26.8
% 35.0
%
34.3
%
35.7
%
37.9
%
21.0
%
31.6
%
53.9
%
35.8
%40
%
30%
30% 35
%
35% 39
%
52%
41.5
%
24.3
%
34.4
% 40.3
%
36.9
%
55.8
%
40.3
%
39.4
%
26.2
% 30.4
%
34.5
% 38.6
%
53.5
%
38.2
%
20.7
%
35.4
%
28.9
%
47.7
%
New York City Large City Urban-Suburban
Rural Average Low Total Public
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Graduation rates for ELL students
Cohort Membership
2004 10,846
2005 11,265
2006 11,635
2007 12,236
2008 11,986
![Page 85: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
8585
Graduation rates of ELLs compared to non-ELLs.
34.3%
76.2%
English Language Learners Non-English Language Learners
Percentage of students who started 9th grade in 2008 who graduated by June 2012
2008 Cohort MembershipEnglish Language Learners 11,986Non-English Language learners 209,380
![Page 86: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
86
Credentials EarnedBy Those Who Graduated:
Regents Diplomas vs.
Local Diplomas
86
![Page 87: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
8787
2008 Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June 2012 By Racial/Ethnic Group and Gender.
Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated
All Students
5.4% 8.3% 0.9% 5.9% 9.6% 4.5% 7.1% 3.8% 5.1%
71.3% 72.1%
35.7% 39.7%
76.5%77.5%
73.9% 72.8%
43.8% 48.7%
23.2% 19.7%
63.4% 58.6%
17.6% 12.9%21.6% 20.0%
52.4% 46.2%
1.6%AmericanIndian /AlaskaNative
Female
AmericanIndian /Alaska
Native Male
AsianFemale
Asian Male BlackFemale
Black Male HispanicFemale
HispanicMale
WhiteFemale
White Male
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
349 315 7,475 7,405 13,631 11,356 13,977 12,811 48,263 47,570Graduate Count:
![Page 88: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
8888
Total Cohort Graduation Rate After Four Years Through June
Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated American Indian/ Alaska Native Students and All Students
24.0% 19.2% 15.3% 16.1%5.4%
19.2% 19.2% 17.7% 14.5%8.3%
16.5% 14.7% 10.2%
46.2% 55.0%55.2% 59.2%
71.3%54.3%
61.1% 58.2% 60.6% 72.1%
38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 47.3% 53.6%41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 55.9%
29.8% 25.9% 29.4% 24.8% 24.9% 19.7%
44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1% 40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%
5.8%12.6% 9.4%
4.0%
15.9% 12.6%14.3%
24.1%19.7%23.2% 26.5%
AI/AN Female 2004
AI/AN Female 2005
AI/AN Female 2006
AI/AN Female 2007
AI/AN Female 2008
AI/AN Male 2004
AI/AN Male 2005
AI/AN Male 2006
AI/AN Male 2007
AI/AN Male 2008
All Female 2004
All Female 2005
All Female 2006
All Female 2007
All Female 2008
All Males 2004
All Males 2005
All Male 2006
All Male 2007
All Male 2008
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
![Page 89: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
8989
Total Cohort Graduation RateAfter Four Years Through June
Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated Asian Students and All Students
9.3% 8.4% 6.1%16.5% 14.7% 10.2% 5.8%
26.9% 28.6% 31.0% 31.2% 35.7%29.7% 31.7% 33.4% 36.7% 39.7%
38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 47.3% 53.6%
41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 55.9%
63.8% 63.0% 62.9% 64.3% 63.4% 60.7% 59.3% 60.1% 58.1% 58.6%
44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1% 40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%
5.2%6.5%9.7%4.6% 9.0%1.6%0.9%
12.6% 9.4%4.0%
15.9% 12.6%14.3%
Asain Females 2004
Asain Females 2005
Asian Females 2006
Asian Females 2007
Asian Females 2008
Asian Males 2004
Asian Males 2005
Asian Males 2006
Asian Males 2007
Asian Males 2008
All Female 2004
All Female 2005
All Females 2006
All Females 2007
All Females 2008
All Males 2004
All Males 2005
All Males 2006
All Males 2007
All Males 2008
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
![Page 90: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
9090
Total Cohort Graduation RateAfter Four Years Through June
Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated Black Students and All Students
32.5% 27.2% 23.5%15.9%
5.9%
34.5%29.1% 25.6%
18.5%9.6%
16.5% 14.7% 10.2% 5.8%
48.9% 55.4% 58.0%66.1%
76.5%
49.6% 55.5% 60.3%67.2%
77.5%
38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 47.3% 53.6%
41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 55.9%
18.6% 17.5% 18.4% 18.0% 17.6% 15.9% 15.4% 14.1% 14.3% 12.9%
44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1% 40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%
14.3% 12.6%15.9%4.0%
9.4%12.6%
Black Females 2004
Black Females 2005
Black Females 2006
Black Females 2007
Black Females 2008
Black Males 2004
Black Males 2005
Black Males 2006
Black Males 2007
Black Males 2008
All Female 2004
All Female 2005
All Females 2006
All Females 2007
All Females 2008
All Males 2004
All Males 2005
All Males 2006
All Males 2007
All Males 2008
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
![Page 91: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
9191
Total Cohort Graduation RateAfter Four Years Through June
Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated Hispanic Students and All Students
31.8% 27.9%22.1%
14.6%4.5%
29.8% 25.8% 21.2%15.7%
7.1%16.5% 14.7% 10.2% 5.8%
46.5% 51.6% 57.7%64.0%
73.9%
48.2% 53.5% 58.2% 64.7%72.8%
38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 47.3% 53.6%41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 55.9%
21.6% 20.5% 20.2% 21.4% 21.6% 22.0% 20.8% 20.5% 19.6% 20.0%
44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1% 40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%
12.6% 9.4%4.0%
15.9% 12.6%14.3%
Hispanic Females 2004
Hispanic Females 2005
Hispanic Females 2006
Hispanic Females 2007
Hispanic Females 2008
Hispanic Males 2004
Hispanic Males 2005
Hispanic Males 2006
Hispanic Males 2007
Hispanic Males 2008
All Female 2004
All Female 2005
All Females 2006
All Females 2007
All Females 2008
All Males 2004
All Males 2005
All Males 2006
All Males 2007
All Males 2008
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
![Page 92: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
9292
Total Cohort Graduation RateAfter Four Years Through June
Credentials Earned by Students Who Graduated White Students and All Students
9.8% 8.8% 7.8% 10.4% 9.2% 8.5%16.5% 14.7% 10.2% 5.8%
36.0% 37.8% 37.9% 39.3% 43.8%40.6% 43.1% 43.0% 44.9% 48.7%
38.9% 42.1% 43.9% 47.3% 53.6%
41.9% 45.4% 46.9% 50.5% 55.9%
54.2% 53.3% 54.4% 54.1% 52.4% 48.9% 47.7% 48.5% 47.6% 46.2% 44.6% 43.2% 43.5% 43.3% 42.4% 42.1% 40.3% 40.5% 39.4% 38.3%
5.1%7.5%3.8%6.6%12.6% 9.4%
4.0%
15.9% 12.6%14.3%
White Females 2004
White Females 2005
White Females 2006
White Females 2007
White Females 2008
White Males 2004
White Males 2005
White Males 2006
White Males 2007
White Males 2008
All Female 2004
All Female 2005
All Females 2006
All Females 2007
All Females 2008
All Males 2004
All Males 2005
All Males 2006
All Males 2007
All Males 2008
Local Diploma Regents Diploma Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
![Page 93: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
9393
Diplomas Awarded to Students with Disabilities of Total Diplomas Awarded 2005-2008 Cohorts
7.2% 7.0% 7.0%
41.8% 42.0% 41.4% 40.4%
45.3% 45.8% 47.8%
43.7% 45.4% 48.8% 54.7%
47.5% 47.2% 45.2%
14.5% 12.6% 9.8% 4.9%
6.6%
51.1%
42.3%
Students with Disabilities 2005
Students withDisabilities 2006
Students withDisabilities 2007
Students withDisabilities 2008
All Students 2005
All Students2006
All Students2007
All Students2008
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
![Page 94: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
9494
English Language Learners by Diploma Type of Total Diplomas Awarded 2008 Cohort
16.4%
41.0% 40.4%
73.5%
54.2% 54.7%
10.1%4.7% 4.9%
ELL Non-ELL All Students
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Regents Diploma Local Diploma
![Page 95: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
9595
30.6
%
48.8
%
61.2
%
72.6
%
59.4
%
71.1
%
80.7
%
70.4
%
84.1
%
40.9
%45
%
33%
52%
64%
74%
61%
85%
49.2
%
33.2
%
53.3
%
65.4
%
76.6
%
87.0
%
64.2
%
53.0
%
41.1
%
56.3
%
67.0
%
78.7
% 87.4
%
66.8
%
57.7
%
45.6
%
60.6
%
90.9
%
New York City Large City Urban-Suburban Rural Average Low Total Public
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with
Advanced Designation after 4 Years by Need Resource Group Through June
![Page 96: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
9696
7.6%
13.1
% 16.5
%
27.6
%
20.6
%
20.5
%
35.2
%
48.9
%
7.0% 9% 7%
17%
17%
30%
22%
51%
11.1
%
7.7%
16.7
%
18.4
%
31.4
%
51.6
%
23.3
%
12.4
%
9.4%
17.6
%
19.9
%
32.6
%
53.4
%
24.4
%
14.1
%
7.8%
25.8
%
18.6
%
55.4
%
New York City Large City Urban-Suburban Rural Average Low Total Public
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort Students with Disabilities Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with
Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June by Need/Resource Capacity Category
![Page 97: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
9797
6.8%
18.4
%
21.1
% 26.9
%
18.5
%
18.8
%
28.6
% 35.5
%
17.7
% 22%
13%
19% 22
%
23%
22%
36%
26.9
%
10.8
%
22.8
%
22.5
%
25.8
%
41.1
%
26.3
%29.3
%
15.4
% 21.3
%
19.0
%
27.2
%
37.1
%
27.9
%30
.9%
23.2
%
32.0
%
25.6
%
45.1
%
New York City Large City Urban-Suburban Rural Average Low Total Public
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort English Language Learners Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with
Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June by Need/Resource Capacity Category
![Page 98: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
9898
71.0
%
36.1
%
36.1
%
73.7
%
54.5
%
80.6
%
54.5
%
81.9
%
59.4
%
44.2
%45
.5%
73.4
%
40.1
%
40.1
%
75.3
%
61.4
%
49.4
%
77.4
%
43.5
%
44.9
%
77.3
%
64.2
%
50.4
%
78.4
%
48.4
%
49.3
%
79.1
%
66.8
%
53.7
%
70.4
%
American Indian /Alaska Native
Asian Black Hispanic White All Students
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort Students by Racial/Ethnic Group Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced
Designation After Four Years Through June
![Page 99: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
9999
40.0
%
44.2
%
63.0
%
55.8
%
59.0
%
50.1
%
74.7
%
66.3
%
51.3
% 59.4
%61
.4%
57.8
%65.2
%
45.5
%
40.8
%48.8
%
64.2
%
60.6
%67.9
%
49.4
%
44.7
%49.9
%
66.8
%
63.1
%70.7
%
50.4
%
48.6
%54.7
%
70.4
%
54.5
%
American Indian /Alaska Native
Female
American Indian /Alaska Native Male
American Indian /Alaska Native Total
All Female All Male All Students
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort American Indian/Alaska Native Students by Gender Who Received a Regents
Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
![Page 100: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
100100
66.4
% 71.0
%
63.0
%
55.8
%
84.8
%
76.7
%
74.7
%
66.3
%
76.0
%
59.4
%61
.4%
57.8
%65.2
%73.4
%
69.1
%
78.0
%
64.2
%
60.6
%67.9
%
77.4
%
74.3
%81.7
%
66.8
%
63.1
%70.7
%78.4
%
74.6
%82.7
%
70.4
%
80.6
%
Asian Female Asian Male Asian Total All Female All Male All Students
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort Asian Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years
Through June
![Page 101: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
101101
30.8
% 36.1
%
63.0
%
55.8
%60.0
%
47.5
%
41.3
%
59.4
%61
.4%
57.8
%65.2
%
40.1
%
35.0
%
45.1
%
64.2
%
60.6
%67.9
%
43.5
%
38.1
%
49.0
%
66.8
%
63.1
%70.7
%
48.4
%
42.8
%
54.1
%
66.3
%
74.7
%
70.4
%
53.7
%
Black Female Black Male Black Total All Female All Male All Students
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Total 2007 Total 2008 Total
Percentage of Total Cohort Black Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
After Four Years Through June
![Page 102: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
102102
32.6
%
36.1
%
63.0
%
55.8
%
59.3
%
49.9
%
74.7
%
66.3
%
39.6
%
59.4
%61
.4%
57.8
%65.2
%
40.1
%
36.4
%43.9
%
64.2
%
60.6
%67.9
%
44.9
%
40.7
%49.0
%
66.8
%
63.1
%70.7
%
49.3
%
44.7
%
54.0
%
70.4
%
54.5
%
Hispanic Female Hispanic Male Hispanic Total All Female All Male All Students
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort Hispanic Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation
After Four Years Through June
![Page 103: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
103103
70.5
%
73.7
%
63.0
%
55.8
%
85.4
%
78.6
%
74.7
%
66.3
%
77.1
%
59.4
%61
.4%
57.8
%65.2
%
75.3
%
72.0
%78.7
%
64.2
%
60.6
%67.9
%
77.3
%
74.2
%80.6
%
66.8
%
63.1
%70.7
%79.1
%
76.1
%82.3
%
70.4
%
81.9
%
White Female White Male White Total All Female All Male All Students
2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort
Percentage of Total Cohort White Students by Gender Who Received a Regents Diploma or
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation After Four Years Through June
![Page 104: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
104
Mathematics Regents ExaminationsImplementation / Transition Timeline
Approved by the Board of Regents 12/8/05
Mathematics A
Mathematics B Algebra Geometry Algebra 2/
Trigonometry
2006-07 X X
2007-08 X X
XFirst admin. in
June 2008
2008-09X
Last admin. in January 2009
X X
XFirst admin. in
June 2009
2009-10X
Last admin. in June 2010
X XX
First admin. in June 2010
2010-11 X X X
2011-12 X X X .
![Page 105: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
105
Local Diploma Phase-Out* TimelineRequirements for Students Entering Grade 9 in:
September 2002-04
September2005
September2006
September2007
September2008
September2009
September2010
September2011
Regents Examination score of 65+
0 2 3 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A
& Regents Examination score of 55-64
1-5 3 2 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Or, for students with disabilities:
Regents Examination score of 55-64
1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5
Regents Competency
Tests1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 1-6 N/A
.
* The local diploma option remains for general education students who pass three Regents examinations with a score of 65 or above and two Regents examinations through an appeals process. In addition, students with disabilities who first enter grade 9 in September 2005 or later and earn a Regents examination score between 55 and 64 continue to be eligible for a local diploma. Students with disabilities who first enter grade 9 no later than the 2010-11 school year, but fail any of the five required Regents examinations, may earn a local diploma by passing the corresponding Regents Competency Test.
![Page 106: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
106
Graduation Rate Release:2008 Cohort through June/August 2012
Students excluded from a school/district cohort:•Transferred to a different New York public school, nonpublic school, or a school outside New York•Transferred to home-schooling•Transferred to a postsecondary school prior to earning a diploma•Transferred outside district by court order to a program that provide access to a regular high school diploma•Left the United States•Deceased
![Page 107: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
107
Graduation Rate Release:2008 Cohort through June/August 2012
•Graduation Rate equals the number of students in the 2008 cohort who earned a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation diploma divided by the total number of students in the 2008 cohort
•Students who earn GED or IEP diplomas cannot be included as graduates for graduation rate reporting purposes*
* See federal guidance at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdf
![Page 108: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
108
Required Documentation for Removal from the Cohort
Transfer:•Written request for a transcript from the receiving school, a record of sending a transcript to the receiving school, written acknowledgement from the receiving school that the student has registered, written notice of the intent to instruct at home, copy of post-secondary admission notification and schedule of courses taken, or a copy of the court order placing student out of district.
Left the United States:•Written statement from a parent or guardian indicating a destination or written documentation from a school administrator of a conversation had with the student’s parent indicating that the family is leaving the country, which the administrator includes in the student’s file.
See federal guidance at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/hsgrguidance.pdf
![Page 109: Revised Cohort Definitions](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56815c8c550346895dca9dbd/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
109
Graduation Rates:Students Who Started 9th Grade
in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008Supplemental Packet