review of health inequalities at the local level maggie rae head of health inequalities & head...
TRANSCRIPT
Review of Health InequalitiesReview of Health Inequalitiesat the local level at the local level
Maggie RaeHead of Health Inequalities & Head of Local Delivery11 May 2006
2010 Target
Wider Social
determinantsHealth Inequalities
Setting the target in context
Interpreting the evidence -What are the causes of early death in Spearhead areas?
The target can be delivered if actions are targeted at these causes of early death…
Males
35%
18%
15%
10%
5% 2%
10%
5%
Contribution to Life Expectancy Gap in Males Breakdown by disease, 2003
Females
30%
16%
21%
9%
5% 2%
11%
6%
Contribution to Life Expectancy Gap in Females Breakdown by disease, 2003
All circulatory diseases
All cancers
Respiratory diseases
Digestive
External causes of injury and poisoningInfectious & parasitic
diseases
Other
Deaths under 28 days
Main causes of deaths contributing to the Life Expectancy gap in Spearhead areas
Circulatory diseases account for the largest proportion of excess deaths in Spearhead areas, most of which is attributable to coronary heart disease (CHD) (70% in males and 63% in females).
Cancers and respiratory diseases, particularly lung cancer and chronic obstructive airways disease respectively, then account for a major proportion of the remainder of deaths.
The remaining third are attributable to a range of causes including injury, digestive, poisoning, infectious and parasitic diseases, and deaths under 28 days.
The pattern of causes of deaths contributing to the life expectancy gap in Spearhead areas is broadly similar for both males and females with cancers, circulatory and respiratory diseases accounting for over 65% in each.
The Impact – for males
1.0%
2.3%
1.0%
0.7%
1.2%
0.7%
2.1%
0.2%
1.4%
0.2%0.2%
8.9%
Fu
rthe
r mo
dellin
g o
f Oth
er a
ctions w
ill
ne
ed to
contrib
ute th
e re
main
ing
2.1%
11%
The Impact – for females
1.0% 1.4% 0.9%0.5%
3.2%
1.6%
5.6%
0.4%1.0%0.2%0.2%
10.4%
Fu
rthe
r mo
dellin
g o
f Oth
er a
ctions w
ill
ne
ed to
contrib
ute th
e re
main
ing
5.6%
16%
Universalist:• Smoking reduction in clinics – as at
present• Secondary prevention of CVD:75%
coverage of 35-74yrs• Primary prevention of CVD in hyptensives
under 75 yrs:20% coverage antihypertensivestatin therapy
The InterventionsTargeted:• Smoking cessation clinics: double
capacity in Spearhead areas for 2 years
• Secondary prevention of CVD: additional 15% coverage of effective therapies in Spearhead areas 35-74 yrs
• Primary prevention of CVD in hypertensives under 75yrs:
40% coverage antihypertensives
statin therapy
• Primary prevention of CVD in hypertensives 75yrs +:
40% coverage antihypertensives
statin therapy
• Other*, including:Early detection of cancerRespiratory diseasesAlcohol related diseasesInfant mortality
Interventions to reduce the gap Actions to reduce deaths caused by cardiovascular disease (CVD) can reduce the gap in life expectancy but these will not be sufficient to deliver the targets. There is evidence that actions targeted at other cases of early death will be able to contribute enough to enable the target to be delivered but further work is needed to complete this modelling. It is, however, clear that the NHS can deliver the target if it uses this model (and later refinements to it) to reduce early deaths.
Expectation in the community is very low, we don’t demand.
Expectation in the community is very low, we don’t demand.
Doctor told me ‘I have other patients to see’. You feel like a nuisance.
Local people don’t talk about life expectancy, the news is so grim.
Local people don’t talk about life expectancy, the news is so grim.
The words are there from DH and then there’s real life.
The words are there from DH and then there’s real life.
I’m not ill, I’m just getting old (49 year old patient).
I’m not ill, I’m just getting old (49 year old patient).
Life expectancy? It’s the Cinderella target.Life expectancy? It’s the Cinderella target.
The public said…The professionals said…
Community engagement• We need clinical interventions to save people’s lives, but we also need to engage with people and give them a reason for living
Female vs male % point change in life expectancy gap, by local authority, 1995-97 to 2002-04
-4.00%
-3.00%
-2.00%
-1.00%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
-2.50% -2.00% -1.50% -1.00% -0.50% 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00%
% point change in gap - female
% p
oin
t ch
an
ge
in g
ap
- m
ale
13 Spearhead areas are on track to deliver both male and female elements
29 are on track to deliver one element, less than 20% are on track
28 are off track for both elements
15 areas are on track to deliver the male element of the target
13 areas are on track to deliver the target
28 areas are off track for both elements of the target
14 areas are on track to deliver the female element of the target
Note: The changes needed in life expectancy vary but are very small in all areas.
60% of Spearhead areas are makingsome progress towards the target
Summary of life expectancy delivery status as of 2002-04
Summary of Spearhead Group status - number and % of Spearhead areas - local track to narrow life expectancy gap with England by 10%
by 2010
13
1514
28
19% 21% 20% 40%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Male and femalelife expectancy on
track
Male lifeexpectancy only
on track
Female lifeexpectancy only
on track
Male and femle lifeexpectancy both
off track
Num
ber
of
are
as
Initiatives to help reduce Health Inequalities
Health ChampionsCommunities for Health
Health TrainersLife Check
Antihypertensives and statintherapyEffective therapies in CVD
Smoking cessation
Other
Antihypertensives and statintherapy (>75 y)Antihypertensives and statintherapy (<75 y)Additional coverage of effectivetherapies in CVDSmoking cessation
Antihypertensives and statintherapy
Cancer screening
Obesity treatment
Smoking cessation
Respiratory illness
HIV
Hepatitis C
Sexual Health
Accidents
Immunisation
Physical activity
Healthy eating
Education
Income
Crime
Work/unemployment
Alcohol
Smoking ban
Housing
IMPACT OF INTERVENTIONS TO REDUCE THE LIFE EXPECTANCY GAP
2006 2010 PSA TARGET 2015 2020
NHS/OGD NHS/OGD NHS/OGD
ALL INTERVENTIONS START
but ……
Difference in % distribution of mortality between Spearhead Group and England in quinary age bands, 2002-04
-6.0%
-5.0%
-4.0%
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
Female difference
Male difference
• There were approximately 13,700 additional deaths for 30 to 59 year olds in Spearhead groups, between 2002-04, compared to the national average for England
• The focus needs to be on reducing adult early deaths
• Action on the overall PSA target to reduce infant mortality will also help deliver the reduction in life expectancy gap target
Too many people in Spearhead areas are dying early