reu final presentation

25
Hierarchically porous Pd/C catalysts in nitrobenzene flow hydrogenations Brennen Lummus 1

Upload: brennen-lummus

Post on 14-Apr-2017

21 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: REU Final Presentation

Hierarchically porous Pd/C catalysts in

nitrobenzene flow hydrogenations

Brennen Lummus

1

Page 2: REU Final Presentation

Importance of Hydrogenation

• Hydrogenation of vegetable oils to make margarine and shortenings [2]

• Hydrocracking in the petrochemical industry [1]

• Production of specialty chemicals such as aniline and cyclohexane [4,6]

• Commercially performed using heterogeneous catalysts – supported Ni, Pd, or Pt [5]

2

Page 3: REU Final Presentation

Hierarchically Porous Catalysts• Hierarchy of pore sizes in the

structure

1.Less potential for coking of catalyst

2. Increased accessible surface area and metal dispersion [3]

3.Decreased metal particle size

• Theoretically: Longer lifetime, greater product conversion

3

Advantages

Page 4: REU Final Presentation

Monolith StructuresThruPore Commerc

ial

4Video

Page 5: REU Final Presentation

Reactor Design

5

Page 6: REU Final Presentation

Reactor Assembly

Packed-bed Down-flow Constructed with glass and polyethylene tubing

6

Page 7: REU Final Presentation

Flow and Temperature Controls

• Gas Flow: rotameter, range of 0-65 cm3/min

• Liquid Flow: syringe pump with 60 mL plastic syringe

• Temperature: temperature control unit with K-type thermocouple and heating tape

7

Page 8: REU Final Presentation

Catalyst Loading

• Pre-heat, catalyst bed, and post-bed zones

• ½ inch ID glass tube

• Catalyst and 1 mm glass beads

8

Page 9: REU Final Presentation

Model Reaction-Hydrogenation of Nitrobenzene

• 3:1 Hydrogen to Nitrobenzene stoichiometric ratio

• Problem: Hydrogen is a gas, reactor volume is small

• Low Flow – prevent pressure build-up

Parameters studied

• Amount of catalyst• Temperature• Residence Time• Metal Loading• Type (manufacturer)

N

O

OH

3 H2

NH2

H2O2

9

Page 10: REU Final Presentation

Qualitative Observations

• Catalyst eventually deactivates

• Product concentrations change

• Accompanied by color changes

10

Page 11: REU Final Presentation

Terms to Know• Activity: How fast the reaction proceeds in the presence of the

catalyst

• Conversion: Moles reactant converted Moles of reactant fed

• Selectivity: Moles product X formed Moles reactant converted

• Reactivity: General term for the overall “strength” of the catalyst

• Residence Time: How long the substrate spends in the reactor bed

11

Page 12: REU Final Presentation

Major Possible Products

NH2

HN

HN

NH2

Aniline Cyclohexylamine

N-cyclohexylaniline Diphenylamine

12

Page 13: REU Final Presentation

Results - Catalyst Mass

• Conditions: 230 °C, .07 mL/min NB, 60 cm3/min H2, 1% Pd/C ThruPore catalyst

• Very similar results

NH2

HN

HN

NH2

HN

HN

13

Page 14: REU Final Presentation

Results- Temperature

• Conditions: .07 mL/min NB, 60 cm3/min H2, 1% Pd/C ThruPore catalyst

• Higher Temp: greater initial by-product concentration, deactivation occurs sooner

NH2

HN

HN

NH2

HN

HN

14

Page 15: REU Final Presentation

Results - Residence Time

• Conditions: 230 °C, .07 mL/min NB, 60 cm3/min H2, 1% Pd/C ThruPore catalyst

• Conditions: 230 °C, .03 mL/min NB, 30 cm3/min H2, 1% Pd/C

ThruPore catalyst

• Delayed Deactivation

NH2

HN

HN

NH2

HN

HN

15

Page 16: REU Final Presentation

Results- Metal Loading• Conditions: 230 °C, .07 mL/min NB,

60 cm3/min H2, 2.0 grams ThruPore Catalyst

• Deactivation seen sooner in 0.5% and 2% metal loading catalysts

16

NH2

HN

HN

Page 17: REU Final Presentation

Results- Commercial Comparison

• Conditions: 230 °C, .07 mL/min NB, 60 cm3/min H2, 2.0 grams 1% Pd/C catalyst

• Neither deactivates, commercial – higher aniline selectivity

17

Page 18: REU Final Presentation

Conclusions• Commercial catalyst is more selective

for the hydrogenation of nitrobenzene to aniline

• ThruPore catalyst is more reactive

• Catalyzes a deamination reaction alongside hydrogenation

• Yields by-products, N-cyclohexylaniline and Diphenylamine, in significant proportions

N

O

O

NH2 NH2

HN

+H2

+3 H2

-NH3

Hydrogenations

Deamination

18

Page 19: REU Final Presentation

Future Prospects• Study more substrates – styrene,

benzene, dichlorobenzene, maleic acid

• Determine mechanism of the deamination reaction

• Continuous improvement of reactor – glass syringe, MFC, flow meter with broader range

Cl

Cl

HO OH

OO

19

Page 20: REU Final Presentation

References

1) "The Hydrocracking Process." Refining NZ. Refining NZ, n.d. Web. 28 July 2016.2) "Hydrogenation of Unsaturated Fats and Trans Fat." Chemwiki. N.p., 01 Oct. 2013. Web. 28 July

2016.3) Kotbagi, T. V., et al. (2015). "Novel one-pot synthesis of hierarchically porous Pd/C monoliths by a

co-gelation method." MRS Communications 5(01): 51-56.4) Li, C. H., et al. (2005). "Nitrobenzene hydrogenation with carbon nanotube-supported platinum

catalyst under mild conditions." Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 226(1): 101-105.5) Sangeetha, P., et al. (2009). "Hydrogenation of nitrobenzene over palladium-supported catalysts

—Effect of support." Applied Catalysis A: General 353(2): 160-165.6) Solymosi, F. (1968). "Importance of the Electric Properties of Supports in the Carrier Effect."

Catalysis Reviews 1(1): 233-255.

20

Page 21: REU Final Presentation

Acknowledgements• ThruPore and NSF for the funding to carry out this project

• Dr. Vincent and the University of Alabama REU program for this opportunity

• Dr. Martin Bakker and Dr. Trupti Kotbagi for advice and guidance

• Dr. Qiaoli Liang for training and assistance on the GCMS software

21

Page 22: REU Final Presentation

Heterogeneous Catalysts

• Phase of catalysts differs from the phase of the reactants

Homogeneous

Heterogeneous

Page 23: REU Final Presentation

Conversion and Selectivity Clarification

Example:

• Run 100 g of NB through reactor• Product consists of 50 g NB, 40 g

aniline, and 10 g diphenylamine

• Conversion is 50%• Selectivity is 80% aniline, 20%

diphenylamine

22

Page 24: REU Final Presentation

Chromatogram and SpectrumTP DC 2.118 LF RUN 1, HR 17, '4'

Time1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 16.00

%

0

100BAKKER-072016-4 Sm (Mn, 2x1) Magnet EI+

TIC1.34e6

Area, HeightArea%70.6117.6511.74

Area142139.1935522.3623636.50

Height1252044452655299336

Time4.31

10.2210.70

4.311421391252044

10.2235522

452655 10.7023636299336

TP DC 2.118 LF RUN 1, HR 17, '4'

m/z62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100

%

0

100

BAKKER-072016-4 187 (4.285) Cn (Cen,2, 80.00, Ht); Cm (186:187) Magnet EI+ 6.55e493.166.0

65.0

64.063.0

92.1

67.178.077.076.075.0

91.190.0

94.1

95.1

(m a in lib ) A n iline60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108

0

50

100

63

65

66

6774 76 78 86 88 91

92

93

9495

NH2

23

Page 25: REU Final Presentation

Why Vapor Phase?

• Greater kinetics

• Solubility of hydrogen is low in nonpolar liquids

• Less transverse force on catalyst particles by gas compared to liquid

24