reu final powerpoint
TRANSCRIPT
An Investigation of Two Putative Peroxisomal Proteins: AtFHIT and
AtHINT2
Alyssa Castle1, Ali Dorchak2, Laura Olsen2
1Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann
Arbor, Michigan
Peroxisomes
Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th edition.Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, et al.New York: Garland Science; 2002.
Small membrane bound organelles Found in all eukaryotic cells
Responsible for many metabolic functions Catabolism of Long Chain Fatty
Acids Metabolism of H2O2
Many peroxisomal disorders, usually resulting in death in early stages of life Zellweger Syndrome X-Linked
Adrenoleuknodystrophy D-Bifunctional Protein
Deficiency
Peroxisomal Targeting Signals
Peroxisomes lack their own genome Proteins are synthesized in the cytosol,
then transported into the peroxisome In order for proteins to be imported into
peroxisomes, they must have one or both PTS1 (Carboxyl-terminal) or PTS2 (Amino-terminal) signals Like a zip code
Question/Hypothesis Do the AtFHIT and AtHINT2 encoding
proteins localize to the peroxisome? Hypothesize the proteins may localize in
the peroxisome because other proteins within this ‘family’ have been shown to be peroxisomal. HIT1 (PTS1), HIT2 (PTS2), HIT3 (PTS2)
(Reumann S et al. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:125-143)
PTS2 Import Pathway
Once the protein is translocated into the peroxisomal matrix, the PTS2 signal at the amino terminus is cleaved by a protease (DEG15) upon import into the peroxisome.
Methods Lane 1 and 2 are the
PCR amplified products of AtHINT2 and AtFHIT
SP6
T7
Inserted Gene
pCRII-TOPO PCR products were
then inserted into the pCRII-TOPO vector, the resulting plasmid was used to transform TOP10F’ E. coli
MethodsTransformed cells were selected using blue-white screening
Colonies were selected and the plasmid DNA was mini prepped
Restriction digests of the mini prepped DNA were done to drop inserts out of the plasmid
Lanes 4 and 5 show a successful drop of both genes out of pCRII-TOPO
MethodsClones showing a successful drop from the vector were sent for sequencing
Maxi prepped clones and the plasmid DNA was purified by precipitation with PEG
Linearization and purification
Transcription
Translation
Results
TranslationTranslation
-Deg1
5+Deg1
5
-Deg1
5+Deg1
5
AtFHIT AtHINT2
*Expected molecular
mass= 20.4 kDa
Results
- + - + - +0
5
10
15
20
25
Substrate
Corr
ecte
d %
Pro
cess
ed
AtFHIT AtHINT2 AtASP3
Digital audioradiograph protease assay results
Conclusions In vitro experiments with AtFHIT and
AtHINT2 show minimal processing Therefore are not very convincing whether
they are peroxisomal These results are not determinant of
whether or not the proteins are peroxisomal
In vivo experiments would help to further analyze whether these proteins are peroxisomal
AcknowledgementsAli Dorchak
Dr. Laura OlsenThe Olsen Lab
Dr. Aaron WymanDr. Cherie DotsonDr. Ron Woodard
University of Michigan College of PharmacyThe National Science Foundation