retrospective evaluation of central nervous system defects ... · objectives methods results...
TRANSCRIPT
11/09/2018
João Fraga, Ana Catarina Lai, Catarina Cerdeira, Maria Beatriz Pimentão, RuiAlmeida, Helder Moreira, Vânia Almeida, Carlos Faria, Raquel Pina
Retrospective evaluation of central nervous system defects in fetal autopsies and comparison with prenatal diagnosis
Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Central nervous system defects (CNSD) are the most common group of malformations detected prenatally
This study pretend:
To demonstrate CNSD of our institution
To evaluate concordance between prenatal studyand postmortem findings
Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusions
2005 Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra 2016
Autopsies of fetuses: 1372
Categories
1. Anencephaly
2. Myelomeningocele/Encephalocele/Arnold-Chiari defect type II
3. Holoprosencephaly
4. Agenesis of corpus callosum
5. Dandy-Walker malformation
6. Neuronal migration defect
7. Isolated hydrocephalus
8. Without imagiological evaluation
9. Imagiological study with non-CNS anomalies
AutopsyImagiology
?
Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Cardiopulmonary
Upper GI
Lower GI
GU
Encephalon
Extraction examination Post fixation reexamination
Case 1
Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusions
92 females (51%)
84 males (47%)
To demonstrate CNSD of our institution
Central nervous system defects
180 fetuses4 indeterminated genre (2%)
Maternal age was 30,53 years old (range 15 - 45)
Gestational age was 20,72 weeks (range 11 – 36)
Mean
Medical termination of pregnancy – 178Fetal death - 2
To demonstrate CNSD of our institution
1. Anencephaly 20%
2. Myelomeningocele
/ Encephalocele /Arnold-Chiari defect type II
32%
7. Isolated hydrocephal
us 1%
8. Without ultrasound 1%
Prenatal diagnosisObjectives
Methods
Results
Conclusions
1. Anencephaly 20%
7. Isolated hydrocephalus 1%
0. Impossible to study CNS 1%
Fetal autopsy
(n = 36)
(n = 63)
(n = 12)
(n = 2) (n = 2)
(n = 36)
(n = 58)
(n = 14) (n = 16)
(n = 3)
(n = 2)
2. Myelomeningocele
/ Encephalocele /Arnold-Chiari defect type II
32%
To demonstrate CNSD of our institution
Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusions
#
Non-CNS anomalies Fetal autopsy
1 Anamnios Ag. Corpus callosum
2 Pielectasy Ag. Corpus callosum
3 Trissomy 18 Ag. Corpus callosum
4 Trissomy 21 Ag. Corpus callosum
5 Crom. 7 alt. Ag. Corpus callosum
6 Triploidy Neuronal migration def.
7 Crom. 22 + Y duplications
Ag. Corpus callosum
8 Trissomy 18 Ag. Corpus callosum
9 Trissomy 21 Ag. Corpus callosum
10 Trissomy 18 Mielom./A-C. Def. II
Prenatal diagnosis
#Non-CNS
anomalies Fetal autopsy
11 Anamnios Ag. Corpus callosum
12 Trissomy 21 Neuronal migration def.
13 Trissomy 13 Holoprosencephaly
14 Onfalocele Holoprosencephaly
15 Ectopia cordis Holoprosencephaly
16 Trissomy 18 Mielom./A-C. Def. II
17 Trissomy 18 Mielom./A-C. Def. II
18 Oligoamnios Ag. Corpus callosum
19 Abdomial wall defect
Mielom./A-C. Def. II
20 Oligoamnios Dandy-Walker malf.
Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusions
To demonstrate CNSD of our institution
1. Anencephaly 20%
2. Mielomeningocele
/ Arnold-Chiari defect type II
35%
Fetal autopsy
2. 52%
3. 2%
4. 27%
5. 13%
Associated hydrocephalus27% (n = 48)
Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusions
To demonstrate CNSD of our institution
Other associations
1. Anencephaly
Rachischisis 1
Iniencephaly 1
2. Mielomenin
gocele / Arnold-Chiari II
Cerebellum hipoplasia 3
Agenesis of corpus callosum 3
Heterotopy 1
Diastematomiely 1
Rachischisis 1
Choroid plexus cysts 1
Subaracnoid hemorragy 1
Other associations
3.Holoprosencephaly
Agenesis of corpus callosum 3
Polimicrogiria 1
4. Agenesis of corpus callosum
Cerebellum hipoplasia 2
Polimicrogiria 1
Choroid plexus cysts/papiloma
3
Subaracnoid hemorragy 1
5. Dandy-Walker malformation
Ø
6. Neuronal migration defects
Heterotopy 1
Subaracnoid hemorragy 1
7. Isolated hydrocephalus
Heterotopy 1
Other associations
To evaluate concordance between prenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings
Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusions
AutopsyImagiology
Cohen's kappa coefficient
• Without imagiological description• non-CNSD• severe maceration
(n=24)
(95% Confidence Interval, 0,9601-1), p<0,0005
-
SPSS Statistics 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL)
= n= 156
Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusions
This study pretended:
To demonstrate CNSD ofour institution
To evaluate concordance between prenatalultrasound and postmortem findings+
K=0.9832 - Good agreement between prenatal ecography and autopsy
Poor timing of imagiological evaluation can be an important factor in failing to detect abnormalities
Neural tube defects is the most common group of anomalies
Anencephaly (most common isolated NTD) + “Herniation group”
Hydrocephalus - the “tip of the iceberg” for CNSD
Non-CNSD cases – majority associated to genetic anomalies*Agenesis of Corpus Callosum*holoprosencephaphy