responses to the mtor inhibitor sirolimus in patients with malignant pecoma

18
Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with Malignant PEComa Andrew Wagner , Robert Maki, Cristina Antonescu, Christopher Fletcher, Jeffrey Morgan Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York CTOS 2008, London

Upload: symona

Post on 05-Jan-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with Malignant PEComa. Andrew Wagner , Robert Maki, Cristina Antonescu, Christopher Fletcher, Jeffrey Morgan Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with Malignant PEComa

Andrew Wagner, Robert Maki, Cristina Antonescu, Christopher Fletcher, Jeffrey Morgan

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, BostonBrigham and Women’s Hospital, BostonMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York

CTOS 2008, London

Page 2: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

PEComa Family of Tumors

• Lymphangioleiomyoma (LAM)– Cystic lung disease and numerous small lung nodules – Retroperitoneal masses

• Angiomyolipoma (AML)– benign renal tumors– epithelioid AML = PEComa

• Perivascular Epithelioid Cell tumor (PEComa)

• Share common histologic appearance

• Express MITF/TFE3 and melanocytic markers

Page 3: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Sabatini (2006) Nature Reviews Cancer 6:729

LAM/AML Tuberous Sclerosis-Associated or sporadic

Page 4: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Bissler et al (2008) NEJM 358:140

47% tumor reduction 14%

Sirolimus in LAM/AML

Page 5: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Case Series

• Review of 3 consecutive patients with metastatic or advanced PEComa – no known effective systemic therapies

• Dana-Farber Cancer Institute• Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

• Clinical management with sirolimus by treating physician

Page 6: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Patient 1 – Uterine PEComa

61 F with uterine bleeding in 2007

TAH - 9 cm PEComa arising from cervix

Staging studies – numerous bilateral pulmonary metastases

Sirolimus 4 mg, transiently increased to 8 mg but reduced to 4 mg for mild stomatitis

Page 7: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Patient 1Uterine PEComa, 6 weeks

Page 8: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Patient 1 – Uterine Sarcoma

Restaging at 3 months showed significant progression of disease– Sirolimus level 5 ng/mL– Dose increased to 8 mg

Restaging 1 month later: further progression– Sirolimus level 7 ng/mL– Dose reduced to 2 mg and CYP450 3A4 inhibitor

(clarithromycin) added; level 20 ng/mL

Restaging 1 month later showed decrease/stabilization in size of disease

Page 9: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Patient 2 – renal PEComa70 M with hematuria in 2001

– Radical nephrectomy – 9 cm mass – Poorly differentiated sarcomatoid variant

of clear cell adenocarcinoma

2006 Local recurrence resected

2007 Right flank pain from local-regional recurrence– Sunitinib started; progression of disease after 6 weeks

2008 Pathology review at MSKCC: PEComa– Sirolimus 4 mg oral daily – diarrhea and fatigue– Dose reduced to 1 mg oral daily with improvement in symptoms. – Restaging at 6 weeks – PR– Dose reduced to 1 mg qod. Sirolimus level 5-10 ng/mL

Page 10: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Patient 2 – Perirenal PEComa6 months on sirolimus

Page 11: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Patient 3 – Retroperitoneal PEComa

65 M with 20 cm RP PEComa resected in 2005, complicated by preoperative tumor rupture

2007 multifocal RP recurrence resected, with further recurrence 3 months later

Phase I Met inhibitor – rapid progression

2008 – started sirolimus 8 mg/d; level 36 ng/mL

Page 12: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Patient 3 Retroperitoneal PEComa, 9 months

Page 13: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Sabatini (2006) Nature Reviews Cancer 6:729

mTOR activation in malignant PEComa

Page 14: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Iza Malinowska and David Kwiatkowski, Brigham and Women’s Hospital

phospho-S6 Immunohistochemistry

Page 15: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)

Iza Malinowska, Wei Qin, David Kwiatkowski, Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Page 16: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Site Uterine Renal RP

Sirolimus Level

(ng/mL)22 5-10 36

TSC1/2

statusComplete TSC1 loss ? TSC2 LOH

ResponseTransient shrinkage,

SDPR PR

Page 17: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Conclusions

1. mTOR activation, through loss of inhibition by TSC1/2 or other means, is important in growth of malignant PEComa

2. Potential dose-dependent effect of mTOR inhibitor

3. A clinical study of mTOR inhibition in malignant PEComa is warranted

Page 18: Responses to the mTOR Inhibitor Sirolimus in Patients with  Malignant PEComa

Thank You!DFCIAmy Potter, NPKathy Polson, NPBonnie Dirr, NPJames Butrynski, MDJeff Morgan, MDSuzanne George, MDGeorge Demetri, MDChan Raut, MD

BWHIza Malinowska, PhDWei Qin, PhDDavid Kwiatkowski, MD, PhD

Jason Hornick, MD, PhDAlessandra Nascimento, MDChristopher Fletcher, MD

MSKCCRobert Maki, MD, PhDCristina Antonescu, MD

Ludwig Center for Cancer Research at DF/HCC

SPECIAL Fund for PEComa Research

The Patients and their families