responding to classical liberalism

73

Upload: evelia

Post on 05-Jan-2016

64 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Responding to Classical Liberalism. Why did ideologies develop in opposition to classical liberalism? How did classical liberalism respond to competing ideologies? How did the concept of equality expand?. Why did ideologies develop in opposition to classical liberalism?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 2: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 3: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Laissez-faire capitalism was primarily concerned with industrial efficiency and the accumulation of wealth

These goals were considered more important than equality, workers were viewed as one component of production, not necessarily on par with the wealthy elite

Therefore, not all people saw the Industrial Revolution and classical liberalism as positive developments.

Page 4: Responding to Classical Liberalism

There were many protests against the effects of classical liberalism. Not all developed into complete ideologies but nonetheless opposed classical liberalism in some way:

Page 5: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 6: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Chartism was a working-class movement in Britain that focused on political and social reform.

Named after the People’s Charter of 1838 which had 6 goals:◦ Universal suffrage for all men over 21◦ Equal-sized electoral districts◦ Voting by secret ballot◦ And end to the need for property qualifications for

Parliament◦ Pay for members of Parliament◦ Annual elections

Page 7: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Chartism looked to counter the inequality created by the Industrial Revolution and classical liberalism through the electoral process.

Their actions, like those of the Luddites, led to violence

However, their demands were eventually implemented in the Reform Acts of 1867 and 1884

Page 8: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Socialism believes that resources should be controlled by the public for the benefit of everyone in society and not by private interests for the benefit of private owners and investors

Characterized by co-operation and a high degree of state involvement

Socialists rejected the lack of equality and humanitarianism in classical liberalism

Unlike Luddism and Chartism, forms of socialism became effective ideologies

Page 9: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Utopian Socialists

Page 10: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 11: Responding to Classical Liberalism

This type of socialism favours the abolition of private property and the centralization of the means of production in the hands of the state

This is a command economy: an economic system based on public (state) ownership of property in which government planners decide which goods to produce, how to produce them, and how they should be distributed (e.g. what price they should be sold at). This is also known as a centrally planned economy, usually found in communist states

Page 12: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 13: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Classical conservatism was the reaction to classical liberalism

Reactionary, also known as conservative or the Right (referring to the political spectrum), refers to an ideology that supports a return to a previous state of affairs.

Just as the Luddites reacted to industrialization by breaking machines, others reacted to classical liberalism

Edmund Burke believed change should take into account the past and the future, not just the present, therefore change could not come from

the whims of the present generation

Page 14: Responding to Classical Liberalism

He was a reactionary, he reacted to the political issues of the day

He believed:• Society should be a hierarchy with those best suited to

lead at the top because not everyone has equal abilities. Uninformed people should not have a say in government.

• Government should be chosen by a select few with special rights and responsibilities

• Leaders should be humanitarian-care for others• Society must be stable and that can only be achieved

through law, order, customs, and traditions

Page 15: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Classical liberals gradually came to see the merits of their opponents’ views and modified some of the beliefs and values

Laissez-faire capitalism needed to consider workers’ rights and develop a social conscience

Factory owners who wanted to avoid the growing demand for labour unions gave workers some special benefits. This is known as welfare capitalism. This also refers to government programs that would provide social safety nets for workers

Page 16: Responding to Classical Liberalism

How do workers’ rights today compare to those in the 19th, or even early 20th century?

Page 17: Responding to Classical Liberalism

“What is the chief end of man? – to get rich. In what way? – dishonestly if we can; honestly if we must” Mark Twain, 1871

The Gilded Age refers to substantialgrowth in population in the U.S. andextravagant displays of wealth andthe late 19th century.

Page 18: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Men like John D. Rockfeller and Andrew Carnegie made huge fortunes and exemplified the “American Dream”.

Page 19: Responding to Classical Liberalism

These men created their wealth, in part, through the creation of trusts.

Trusts were ways of reducing competition and fixing prices. They were essentially monopolies.

In the 1880s the American people began to demand effective regulation of the trusts.

In 1890 Congress passed the Sherman Anti-Trust Act

In Canada it is called the Combines Investigation Act of 1910/1977.

Page 20: Responding to Classical Liberalism

In U.S. v E.C. Knight and Company, the U.S. Supreme Court in 1895 held that the mere control of 98% of the sugar refining of the country did not in itself constitute an act in restraint of trade.

Congress failed to amend the Act and the executive (Presidents) did little to enforce it.

Page 21: Responding to Classical Liberalism

The power held by rich businessmen was justified by Social Darwinism which at this time was based on several beliefs:

1. The best form of government was that which governed the least.

2. The acquisition of wealth was a mark of divine favour, and that the rich therefore had a moral responsibility both to get richer and to direct the affairs of society.

3. ‘Survival of the fittest ’ as applied to human society.

In short, it was believed that America was a business civilization and should be kept that way.

‘The chief business of the American people is business ’

◦ President Calvin Coolidge (1872 - 1933), Speech in Washington, Jan. 17, 1925

Page 22: Responding to Classical Liberalism

The laissez-faire approach to the American economy did lead to great wealth and power for some. However, it also lead to great poverty for many.

In 1890, 11 of the 12 million people living in the U.S. earned less than $1200/yr. Of that group, the average annual income was $380 (far below the poverty line).

Page 23: Responding to Classical Liberalism

This extreme disparity in wealth soon came to light and began a movement toward change in the social, political and economic structure of U.S. society. That is, it led to a change in the implementation of classical liberal ideology. This movement toward change was called Progressivism.

Page 24: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 25: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Goals:◦ Securing equal suffrage to men and women alike◦ Conservation of human resources (workers’

rights, prohibit child labour, etc.)◦ Implement a single national health service

Most of this early legislation dealt with workers’ rights. It failed to address issues such as child poverty, education, housing standards, etc.

Also, when WW1 broke out the government needed the support of factory owners for the war effort.

Page 26: Responding to Classical Liberalism

This term referred to a classical liberal economic system combined with a government that used legislation to give workers protections such as limited working hours and a minimum wage, and a safety net with features like pensions and medical insurance.

The muckrakers helped create a demand for changes to the classical liberal system of the U.S.

Lead by President Theodore Roosevelt and his “Square Deal”, the U.S. government took action to change the social, political and economic structure of the country.

Page 27: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Changes through Legislation:• 1890 – The Sherman Antitrust Act

-Outlaws monopolies and practices that result in the restriction of trade, such as price fixing.

• 1906 – The Hepburn Act-Required railroads to obtain permission from the Interstate Commerce Commission before raising rates.

1906 Meat Inspection Act

◦ Required the federal inspection of meat processing to ensure sanitary conditions.

Pure Food and Drug Act-Outlawed interstate transportation of impure or

diluted foods and the deliberate mislabeling of foods and drugs. 1913Department of Labour-Cabinet department was created to protect and promote the welfare and employment of

working people.16th AmendmentGave Congress the power to levy an income tax17th AmendmentDirect election of Senators

Page 28: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 29: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Classical Liberalism Modern Liberalism

Focuses on greater individual freedom and economic freedom

Freedom comes from equality of opportunity

Page 30: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Classical Liberalism Welfare State

The government should not interfere in the economy.

If everyone knows that good times are followed by bad times, then it is everyone’s responsibility to save for the bad times.

The government should balance out the highs and lows of the economic cycle by raising/lowering taxes, government spending, and interest rates.

Keynes supported this.

Page 31: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 32: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 33: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 34: Responding to Classical Liberalism

More money in your pockets:Governments should spend money in a recession to reduce its severity. It should also reduce taxes.

Less money in your pockets:Governments should spend less money in boom times to soften a boom. It should also raise taxes.

Page 35: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 36: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 37: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Welcome to Hooverville

Page 38: Responding to Classical Liberalism

The US Government from 1939-1970’s began to intervene in their economy through the following methods:

Monetary PoliciesFiscal PoliciesNationalization of Key

IndustriesRegulationDSEBut it also sent the US into

a Debt heavy nation.

Page 39: Responding to Classical Liberalism

WAGES DID NOT INCREASE AS RAPIDLY AS DID PRODUCTIVITY

DEMAND FOR GOODS COULD NO LONGER KEEP UP WITH INCREASED SUPPLY

DROUGHTS IN MID-WEST = DUST BOWL

BANKS FAILED DEPRESSION SPREAD TO

OTHER COUNTRIES = DISCOURAGED CONSUMERS FROM BUYING U.S. GOODS

PROTECTIONISM & TARIFFS

Page 40: Responding to Classical Liberalism

period of greatly depressed economic activity across the globe caused by:◦ difficulty of returning economy to peacetime basis

after WW1◦ overproduction of goods (result of new technology) in

many countries making it hard to sell excess goods◦ trade barriers erected between countries further

limiting trade◦ income unequally distributed, consumer unable to buy

great quantities of goods required to make economy grow

◦ over speculation of stock markets (Black Thursday stock market crash)

Page 41: Responding to Classical Liberalism

RICH –POOR GAP 5% OF POPULATION

EARNED 1/3 OF COUNTRIES PERSONAL INCOME

25% UNEMPLOYMENT 100, 000 BUSINESSES

WENT BANKRUPT 5 000 BANKS FAILED WAGES FELL 40%

Page 42: Responding to Classical Liberalism

FDR – The man who changed America

Page 43: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Franklin D. Roosevelt (Theodore Roosevelt’s distant cousin) was president of the United States from 1933-1945

He was the first to convert to Keyne’s theories He implemented massive public works

programs to put people to work He called it the “New Deal,” an echo of

Theodore Roosevelt’s “square deal.” This represented the beginning of a shift to the

welfare state and a mixed economy (capitalism with government intervention)

Page 44: Responding to Classical Liberalism

ELECTED PRESIDENT IN 1932

IMPLEMENTED KEYNES IDEAS

ALPHABET LAWS◦ NRA: NATIONAL RECOVERY

ADMINISTRATION◦ PWA: PUBLIC WORKS

ADMINISTRATION◦ CCC: CIVILIAN CONSERVATION

CORPS◦ TVA: TENNESSEE VALLEY

AUTHORITY◦ SEC: SECURITIES EXCHANGE

COMMISSION◦ FDI: FEDERAL DEPOSIT &

INSURANCE COMMISSION◦ SSA: SOCIAL SECURITY ACT◦ NLRB: NATIONAL LABOR

RELATIONS BOARD

Page 45: Responding to Classical Liberalism

FAILURE – DID NOT END THE DEPRESSION

UNEMPLOYMENT LEVELS STILL HIGH FAILED TO REACH THE POOR ECONOMY DID NOT FULLY RECOVERY

UNTIL WW II PRODUCTION SUCCESS- LAID FOUNDATION FOR

AMERICAN WELFARE SYSTEM SUCCESS –GOVT RECOGNIZED A

RESPONSIBILITY TO HELP UNEMPLOYED & THE NEEDY

GOVT USED DEFICIT SPENDING FOR FIRST TIME TO STIMULATE ECONOMY

GOVT NOW SHOULD TAKE ACTION IN RESPONSE TO FLUCTUATIONS IN BUSINESS CYCLE

Page 46: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Roosevelt elected in 1932 as a Democrat instituted New Deal soon after taking office, relied on top strategists as advisors

known as “Brain Trust” goal was to provide relief to people, recovery for business and reform for the syste Congress in 1933 allowed expenditures of billions to help people in need of shelter

and food, public works programs set up to provide work and basic wages (known as First Hundred Days)

money also spent to develop industry and better working conditions for industrial workers

government contracts given to private companies to build roads, airports, waterworks, hospitals and ships, largest hydroelectric dam project created by Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA))

Roosevelt appealed to industry to adopt a code of fair competition lowering hours of work setting fair prices setting a minimum wage recognizing trade unions companies complying with this code got to display a Blue Eagle in their windows Roosevelt's Social Security Act of 1935 provided: unemployment insurance to protect workers thrown out of work through no fault of

their own old age pensions for workers who retired at age 65

Page 47: Responding to Classical Liberalism

wealthy people called Roosevelt traitor to his class

businessmen were upset about his attitude that some of them were unscrupulous money-changers

opponents formed the American Liberty League in 1934 to try and get rid of Roosevelt

from 1933-1936 many of his proposed bills were ruled unconstitutional by Supreme Court

Page 48: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 49: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Supply-side economics - economic theory that concentrates on influencing the supply of labour and goods as a path to economic health, rather than approaching the issue through such macroeconomic concerns as gross national product. In the United States during the 1980s, supply-side economics was associated with conservative proponents of the free-market system. Such measures as tax cuts and benefit cuts to the unemployed are basic supply-side tactics, with the intention of increasing the incentive to work and produce goods and services. The theory holds that high marginal tax rates and government regulation discourage private investment in areas that fuel economic expansion, and that more capital in the hands of the private sector will "trickle down" to the rest of the population. The theory gained popularity during the late 1970s, with a tax revolt in California and economic hardship during the Carter administration (1977-81). Arthur Laffer and his "Laffer curve" doctrine became the heart of the economic programs of Ronald Reagan 's presidency, during which tax rates were cut substantially. Although supply siders maintain that the tax cuts of the 1980s were responsible for the decade's economic growth, critics argue that such policies caused massive federal deficits, penalized the poor and middle class, and induced excessive speculation that severely damaged America's economy. The subsequent tax increases under Presidents George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton and the concurrent corporate investment, economic growth, and drop in unemployment during the 1990s further undercut supply-side suppositions.

Page 50: Responding to Classical Liberalism

The Clinton presidency claims to have solely been responsible for the following: Average economic growth of 4.0 percent per year, compared to average growth of 2.8 percent during

the previous years. The economy grew for 116 consecutive months, the most in history. Creation of more than 22.5 million jobs—the most jobs ever created under a single administration,

and more than were created in the previous 12 years. Of the total new jobs, 20.7 million, or 92 percent, were in the private sector.

Economic gains spurred an increase in family incomes for all Americans. Since 1993, real median family income increased by $6,338, from $42,612 in 1993 to $48,950 in 1999 (in 1999 dollars).

Overall unemployment dropped to the lowest level in more than 30 years, down from 6.9 percent in 1993 to just 4.0 percent in January 2001. The unemployment rate was below 5 percent for 40 consecutive months. Unemployment for African Americans fell from 14.2 percent in 1992 to 7.3 percent in 2000, the lowest rate on record. Unemployment for Hispanics fell from 11.8 percent in October 1992 to 5.0 percent in 2000, also the lowest rate on record.

Inflation dropped to its lowest rate since the Kennedy Administration, averaging 2.5 percent, and fell from 4.7 percent during the previous administration.

The homeownership rate reached 67.7 percent near the end of the Clinton administration, the highest rate on record. In contrast, the homeownership rate fell from 65.6 percent in the first quarter of 1981 to 63.7 percent in the first quarter of 1993.

The poverty rate also declined from 15.1 percent in 1993 to 11.8 percent in 1999, the largest six-year drop in poverty in nearly 30 years. This left 7 million fewer people in poverty than there were in 1993.

The surplus in fiscal year 2000 was $237 billion—the third consecutive surplus and the largest surplus ever.

Clinton worked with the Republican-led Congress to enact welfare reform. As a result, welfare rolls dropped dramatically and were the lowest since 1969. Between January 1993 and September of 1999, the number of welfare recipients dropped by 7.5 million (a 53 percent decline) to 6.6 million. In comparison, between 1981-1992, the number of welfare recipients increased by 2.5 million (a 22 percent increase) to 13.6 million people

Page 51: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Priorities: balance budget; stop earmarks; fix entitlements. (Jan 2007) Fact Check: Deficit is increasing substantially this year. (Feb 2006) Fact Check: Overall spending increased 42% under Bush. (Feb 2006) Spending cuts will reduce deficit to half by 2009. (Jan 2006) Protectionists want to escape competition. (Jan 2006) Cut non-security discretionary spending every year. (Jan 2006) Confront the larger challenge of entitlements spending. (Jan 2006) Limit discretionary spending; cut 150 non-essential programs. (Feb 2005) Pay-as-you-go means you pay, he goes and spends. (Oct 2004) The middle class will have to fill the Kerry tax gap. (Oct 2004) Kerry is not credible as a fiscal conservative. (Oct 2004) Kerry will not be able to pay for $2.2T in new spending. (Oct 2004) Bush ties growing economy to his tax cuts. (Mar 2004) Investment and aid to states will help economy rebound. (Aug 2003) Provides assistance to new small businesses. (Aug 2003) Reframed Clinton from economic prosperity to moral failing. (Jun 2003) Restore consumer confidence with tax cuts & new oil supplies. (Mar 2001) Despite prosperity, “It’s time for a change” in Washington. (Oct 2000) Prosperity results from entrepreneurship & ingenuity. (Oct 2000) Private sector responsible for economic boom. (Aug 2000) Make budget biennial; reinstate line-item veto; target pork. (Jun 2000) $46B in new spending on health, education, & defense. (Apr 2000) New Prosperity Initiative: remove obstacles to advancement. (Apr 2000) Simplify tax code to stimulate economic growth. (Apr 1999)

Page 52: Responding to Classical Liberalism

1930’sCanada moved to the left. 1960’s-1970’s overspending moved Canada

to the the right in the 1980& 1990’s In 2009 Canada was in a recession and

began sliding back toward the left. What follows is a description of Canada

government intervention.

Page 53: Responding to Classical Liberalism

The cornerstone of the Bank's monetary policy framework is its inflation-control system, the goal of which is to keep inflation. Inflation is a persistent rise overtime in the average price of goods and services. near 2 per cent — the mid-point of a 1 to 3 per cent target range. This system provides a clear measure of the effectiveness of monetary policy, and increases the predictability of inflation.

The Bank is equally concerned with significant movements in the inflation rate, both above the 2 per cent mid-point and below it. When demandThe level of demand for Canadian goods and services. is strong, it can push the economy against the limits of its capacity to produce. This tends to raise inflation above the midpoint, so the Bank will raise interest rates to cool off the economy. When demand is weak, inflationary pressures are likely to ease. The Bank will then lower interest rates to stimulate the economy and absorb economic slack.

Page 54: Responding to Classical Liberalism

The Bank carries out monetary policy by influencing short-term interest rates. It does this by raising and lowering the target for the overnight rate. (The "overnight rate" is the interest rate at which major financial institutions. Banks, credit unions and similar credit-granting organizations. borrow and lend one-day (or overnight) funds among themselves.) In November 2000, the Bank introduced a system of eight "fixed" dates each year on which it announces whether or not it will change the target for the overnight rate.

Changes in the target for the overnight rate usually lead to changes in other interest rates, and so affect people's spending decisions. This, in turn, influences the level of demand for goods and services. When demand exceeds supply, prices will rise.

Low, stable and predictable inflation is the best contribution that monetary policy can make to a productive, well-functioning economy. It allows Canadians to make spending and investment decisions with more confidence. This encourages longer-term investment in Canada's economy, and contributes to sustained job creation and greater productivity. This in turn leads to real improvements in our standard of living.

Page 55: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Factors Affecting Currency Value:

1. Political Conditions in the Country - This includes the stability of the government, the amount of corruption, bribery and the degree of law and order. Also includes a country's relationships with other countries and especially their relationship to US, UK, China and Russia. The form of government in the country is also a factor used to assess the value of a currency. Consider the widely varying forms of government in Saudi Arabia, China, UK, Venezuela and Thailand, just to name a few.

2. Economic Situation - This includes factors such as jobs, unemployment, work ethic, infrastructure, inflation and direction of the economy. Is it older or newer in orientation; computers and high tech, or more farming and manufacturing.

3. Perception from Outside - The perceptions and attitudes of other countries toward a country are as important as the reality of the country's actual situation. News, media, movies, newspapers, rumors and spin can create perceptions. How much is known about a country? The less that is known, generally, the lower the value of a currency.

4. Demographics - A young population may mean better prospects for the future, people who are more open to change and development and a growing size of the workforce. The overall population of a country is a factor. How much weight does this country have on the world scene.

5. National Leaders - The openness, trustworthiness and likeability of visible leaders is a factor. This includes political leaders, sports figures, business owners and celebrities. Here are some national figures who affect their countries, either for better or for worse. Kim Jung Il, David Beckham, Nicole Kidman, Madonna, Osama bin Laden, Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin. These help form the world's perception of a country.

6. Isolation versus Openness - Continuum China is becoming more open, more transparent. This helps. Cuba is very closed and isolated. Venezuela is becoming more isolated by some of its recent actions. China's markets are becoming more open. Cuba, Kyrgyzstan, Russia and Japan, all have differing levels of openness with the outside world, which affects the value of their currency.

7. Natural Resources - The kind of and amount of exploitation of a country's natural resources certainly helps create a perception of value, or lack thereof, of a country's currency. Mining of minerals, forests, oil, fish and other resources are considered. Also the level of technology to development these resources.

8. Weather Factors such as drought, tsunamis, earthquake and floods are taken into consideration. How frequent are they and how is the country's response to them. These also affect desirability, safety and perception of a country. Is it a tourist destination?

9. War and Conflicts - With which other country is a country at war, and who is it’s allies? Their military strength and technology, their willingness to go to war and for what, are important factors in assessing a country's strength, stability and the value of its currency.

10 . Education - This includes languages spoken, level of computer know-how, Internet connectedness, culture and religion. Scientists, entrepreneurs, authors and inventors are all affected by the type and quality of education in a country.

In conclusion, currency values are determined by many factors. Not just one issue, but a composite of many must be considered. In trading currencies, such as in FOREX, trades are usually made in pairs. Values must be relative to something. So how is a country doing relative to another country is also significant. Common Forex pairs are US dollar and Japanese yen, Euro and US dollar, for example. These and other factors determine the value of a currency. Some are tangible, some intangible. Some are fixed and some are manageable. Sometimes it is the news of the moment and sometimes the long-term situation. That is why currency values are often changing and there is no one place or person who determines currency values. And why currency exchange, based on fluctuating currency values, can be an exciting, lucrative, volatile, fun or disastrous form of business or investment.

Page 56: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Fiscal policy is the use of government taxing and spending powers to affect the behaviour of the ECONOMY.

USA taxes 25-35% Canada taxes 35-45% Sweden taxes 50-60%

Page 57: Responding to Classical Liberalism

USA: UEd, Welfare, OAP Canada: UEd, UHC, Welfare, OAP, Low Cost

Housing, UDC, Workman Compensation, etc.

Sweden: Ued K-PS, UHC, UDC,UEC,UDC, Welfare, Low Cost Housing, Workman Compensation, U Recreation, etc

Page 58: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Laws & regulations Government owned and operated

companies Budget & financial policies Income redistribution

Page 59: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Pollution controls◦ Protect animals and H20 and forests

Fairness laws◦ No false advertising or discrimination◦ Competition laws to prevent monopolies

Minimum wage acts Health & Safety standards

◦ Children’s toys meet standards Old age pensions Food inspection

◦ Restaurant kitchens are sanitary Ex. Agriculture industry

◦ Marketing boards influence food prices using crop controls & quotas

◦ Food inspection◦ Subsidies◦ Gov’t negotiated sales to foreign countries

Page 60: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Feds – control money, import duties, regulate banks

Province – regulate occupations – doctors, lawyers

Municipal – control # of taxes & laws about transport

Anti-Trust Laws in the US Anti- Monopoly Law in Canada: Combines

Investigation Act of 1910

Page 61: Responding to Classical Liberalism

A reduction of government restrictions on business enterprises

Less government = more efficient Ex. Preston Manning & Reform party

promised to◦ Reduce size of fed govt

Ex. Mike Harris repealed labor laws ◦ that banned hiring of replacement workers

during strikes◦ Ended rent controls◦ Made easier for landlords to evict tenants

Page 62: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Nationalization Major government intervention during

World War II Continued this thinking after war Crown Corporation – a business enterprise

owned by government and operated by a government-appointed management team◦ Generate profit for government◦ Control over strategic industries◦ To create full employment◦ Government intervenes to combat ups and

downs of business cycle

Page 63: Responding to Classical Liberalism

1960-1979: 60% of public enterprises created

Petro-Canada 1975: government desire to get revenue

1980s – 300 federal crown corporations, 230 provincial, 300 jointed owned

Government control in ◦ Electrical power◦ Transportation◦ communications

Page 64: Responding to Classical Liberalism

To control an area of the economy necessary for general welfare

Help stimulate regional development Produce goods vital to country’s security Provide services that others unwilling To earn income for government To rescue bankrupt firm essential to a

region To maintain public morality To help stabilize the economy

Page 65: Responding to Classical Liberalism

1980s – Thatcher, Reagan, Mulroney, Klein, Harris

Popular b/c◦ Government bureaucracies too big◦ Ideological climate◦ Drain on treasury◦ Ex. Airline industry

Page 66: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Cut taxes & increase spending = not working

Neo-conservatives: slash spending Critics say not taxing enough on rich and

businesses

Page 67: Responding to Classical Liberalism

1990s Closed hospitals Cuts to education Cuts to social programs Reduced salaries for civil

servants 4500 fewer government

jobs Privatized the energy

sector

Page 68: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Demogrants Social-insurance programs Transfer program Progressive taxes

Page 69: Responding to Classical Liberalism
Page 70: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Labour standards reforms were welcomed by workers but these reforms were set up by the government and capitalists. The workers had no say in their development.

In the 19th century some workers formed unions so they could bargain collectively and go on strike if needed.

Benefits and rights to workers slowly developed

Page 71: Responding to Classical Liberalism

In 1948, the UN incorporated two articles on labour in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Read articles 23 & 24 on page 155 of your text

Page 72: Responding to Classical Liberalism

Classical liberalism proclaimed the equality of men, but not all men. Only certain men were considered “equal” and in most cases women were not included.

In many cases only certain races, economic classes, religious members, etc were permitted to vote while others were excluded.

Women weren’t permitted to vote until much later (depending on the nation) and, in some cases, still do not have the right to vote

Page 73: Responding to Classical Liberalism