resilience thinking (cpwf gd workshop, september 2011)

23
Resilience thinking: Towards new conceptual models in Agricultural/Rural/Basin development…. and modeling Andre F van Rooyen

DESCRIPTION

By Andre van Rooyen. As part of a CPWF September 2011 workshop in Thailand regarding global drivers. We have divided driver types into five categories:1. Demographic/Social,2. Economic,3. Political/Institutional/Legal,4. Environmental/Climate change,5. Technological/ Innovations

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

Resilience thinking: Towards new conceptual models in

Agricultural/Rural/Basin development….and modeling

Andre F van Rooyen

Page 2: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

Complex systems Ostrom 2007

Three aspects of decomposability of complex subsystems are important:1. conceptual partitioning of variables into classes and

subclasses. 2. is the existence of relatively separable subsystems

that are independent of each other in the accomplishment of many functions and development but eventually affect each other’s performance.

3. that complex systems are greater than the sum of their parts.

Page 3: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

What is resilience and why should we be concerned?

The ability of a “system” (social-ecological or SES) to recover from shock/perturbation;

3 defining characteristics:1. The amount change a system can undergo and still retain

the same controls on function and structure;2. The degree to which a system is capable of self-

organization and re-organization after shock/change3. The degree to which the system can learn/share

knowledge and adapt.Walker et al. 2002

Page 4: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)
Page 5: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

Back to Plant Ecology 101

• Sustainability• Succession models – Linear models• Equilibrium systems• Disequilibrium• Hollings and Walker

Page 6: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

Cup and ball models…

Page 7: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

Cup and ball models…

Page 8: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

Cup and ball models…

Page 9: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

Cup and ball models…

Page 10: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

State-and-transition-models

Savanna

Annual grasses

Bare soil

Small shrubs

Closed unpalatable woodland

Mixed annual grass/shrubland

Page 11: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

Transitions can be caused by:

• Grazing– Inefficient grazing systems – lack of infrastructure– Inappropriate water provision– Policy – open access systems

• Fire• Frost

Obviously the opposite of these will normally have positive impact!

Page 12: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

Stable degraded states

• Some transitions are irreversible!• Caused by changes in soil, chemistry, structure• Plant spp composition changes and seed

banks• Long lived unpalatable spp.

Stable degraded states are often very resilient I.e. its very difficult to get out of these states.

Page 13: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

Now, apply the same thinking to the whole systemsocio-ecological systems (SES)

• How do the GD interact within the SES in your basin?• What are the specific barriers preventing regime changes?• What are the facilitating environments/conditions which could

drive DES in you area forward?

Think in terms of:• Technologies• Policies• Markets• Incentives• Environmental conditions/constraints/opportunities

Page 14: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)
Page 15: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

Resilience management:

• To prevent the system from moving to undesired system configuration when shocked of challenged/disturbed

• To nurture and preserve the elements that enable the system to renew and reorganize itself following major chock or change

Page 16: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)
Page 17: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)
Page 18: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

Development trajectories and a conceptual model of rural/agricultural development

Page 19: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

• Berkes (2007 p.287) suggested: “the creation of platforms for dialogue and innovation, following a crisis, is key to the stimulation of learning to deal with uncertainties. It helps reorganize conceptual models and paradigms, based on a revised understanding of the conditions generating the crisis.”

Page 20: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)

Folke et al. (2003) defined four clusters of factors, that interact across temporal and spatial scales which increase the resilience of SES

• Learning to live with change and uncertainty • Nurturing diversity in its various forms • Combining different types of knowledge for learning • Creating opportunity for self-organization and cross-scale

linkages

Page 21: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)
Page 22: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)
Page 23: Resilience Thinking (CPWF GD workshop, September 2011)