repository @ napier advocacy & methods december 2008

17
REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Upload: bonnie-small

Post on 23-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

REPOSITORY @ NAPIERAdvocacy

&Methods

December 2008

Page 2: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Definitions:

The “Repository@Napier” comprises computer software designed to store, manage and make accessible through the internet, the various intellectual outputs arising from research in Napier University.

Open Access denotes free provision of information on the internet, especially where it arises from govt. sponsored research.

Page 3: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Aims for the Repository - 1:

Create high online visibility for Napier research Create a central comprehensive online store for

university research output in many formats Ensure ease of access to institutional research in

many disciplines Increase knowledge of & access to university theses Increase availability of Napier research output Reduce time before Napier work is cited Ensure continued, stable, access to deposited online

materials

Page 4: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Aims for the Repository – 2:

Widen dissemination of Napier research outputs and increase their citation rate

Compliance with funding body policies on Open Access

Ensure Napier is not disadvantaged by the 70 British He institutions which already have repositories advertising their expertise

Preparation for the bibliometric Research Evaluation Framework in future

Page 5: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Progress to date:

EPrints supplier was chosen in April 2007 The repository was purchased in June 2007 A pilot shell began operation in August 2007 800 RAE bibliographic records were installed and

metadata was edited by LIS staff during 2008 Transferred to production server in Sept. 2008 Repository was launched and registered with ROAR

in mid-September 2008 OAI Policies were created and OPENDOAR

registration took place in December 2008.

Page 6: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Provision for growth:

In April 2008 the Academic Board approved a mandate to encourage deposit of research output in the Repository@Napier

Academic staff are urged to deposit pre-published, items which have been accepted for publication and which may have been peer-reviewed

At present mediated deposit will be the norm and items may be sent to designated LIS staff, but in future self-deposit will be strongly encouraged

LIS staff will act as repository managers

Page 7: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

When should items be submitted?

Articles may be submitted as follows:– Drafts are not required– First Submissions (Preprints) the submitted ,

pre-refereed form , may be submitted – Second Submissions (Postprints) the version

re-sent after revision to meet referee’s comments, is required

– Proofs should not be submitted for open access– Published Versions should not normally be

submitted, for they violate copyright

Page 8: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Materials suitable for deposit:

Pre-published journal articles Research theses (PhD & MPhil) Images, Films, Sound recordings [Indicative items,

catalogues, programmes or subsections are acceptable]

Technical reports In-house Research Papers Working papers [Where version is recorded carefully]

Support data [Notebooks, lab-books, tables, digital experimental data can be stored, but not manipulated]

Page 9: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

User guidance:

Repository@Napier may be reached from http://www.napier.ac.uk/randkt/repository/Pages/Repository.aspx or from http://www.napier.ac.uk/ researchrepository or from http://research repository.napier.ac.uk

The Mandate on deposits and a Copyright Statement are available through the repository “About” icon

Advice on Finding Tools and on Making a deposit are available through the repository “Help” icon

Additional information may be obtained from Dr. David Cumming, the current Repository Manager.

Page 10: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Faculty Editors:

FECACI – Dr. Cumming will mediate insertion of items or provide help on deposition. He can be contacted at 2367 or [email protected]

HLSS – Lisa McLaren will perform the tasks above and is available at 2278 or [email protected]

NUBS – Lyn Gibson will perform the tasks above and is available at 2582 or [email protected]

User Names & Passwords may be obtained from Dr. Cumming until further notice.

Page 11: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Repository home page:

Page 12: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Searching the Repository:

Search by year work was published Search by Faculty, School or Research Centre Search by Subject (Dewey Classification) Search by Author Simple search for a term within a few chosen metadata

fields Complex search for many terms within many specified

fields Search box enables search for a particular term in any

field

Page 13: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Making a deposit:

Access the Repository Login [User names and passwords for all will

become available soon, meantime contact Dr. Cumming who will supply them on request]

Click on New Item box Then enter minimum data in the Document Type,

Upload and Details boxes before clicking Deposit Check publisher copyright in Sherpa-Romeo box LIS staff will complete data-entry before placing the

item in the open access repository

Page 14: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Extract of typical record content:

Powers in the Land? Duff, Alistair (2008) Powers in the Land? Journalism Practice, 2 (2). pp. 230-244.

ISSN 1751-2786 (In Press) MS Word - Registered users only until 31 October 2009

137KbOfficial URL: http://www.informaworld.com/supp/title~content=t762290976 Abstract/DescriptionThe expansion of opinion is one of the key developments in

the British press, as elsewhere. The article analyses the role of one of the most important types of commentator, newspaper political columnists, examining their credentials, sources, information society prospects, and putative impact.

Keywords: Political columnists; Punditry; British press; Sources; Factual information content; Power; Influence; Political process; Information society;

University Divisions/Research Centres: Faculty of Engineering, Computing and Creative Industries > School of Creative Industries

Dewey Decimal Subjects:000 Computer science, information & general works > 070 News media, journalism & publishing

300 Social sciences > 320 Political science800 Literature > 820 English & Old English literatures

Page 15: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Attaining benefits:

Deposit pre-published articles as the final post-refereed version is sent to the publisher

The more full-text that is deposited the more useful the repository will become

Try searching for overlapping research topics and you may find potential research partners on the staff

Discover items which are potentially useful for inclusion in teaching modules [Copyright permitting]

Depositing items means raising an academic profile across the world through online open access

Page 16: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Links to other repositories:

OAISTER union catalogue of digital resources at http://www.oaister.org

ROAR register of open access repositories with links to each http://roar.eprints.org

Intute a UK wide search of academic repositories http://www.intute.ac.uk/irs

EThOS a collection of UK theses in digital format http://www.ethos.ac.uk

Google scholar at http://scholar.google.co.uk

Page 17: REPOSITORY @ NAPIER Advocacy & Methods December 2008

Conclusion:

Napier University has provided a new tool in support of Research Access and Knowledge Transfer

Academic Staff can make the Repository grow in size and usefulness in future by depositing new research output in many formats

LIS staff will also make the Repository grow by adding retrospective material

Consider: GREAT OAKS FROM LITTLE ACORNS COME – but only when the environment permits!