reporting results - audiences and uses effectiveness evaluation workshop victoria, november 7, 2002...
TRANSCRIPT
Reporting Results -Reporting Results -Audiences and UsesAudiences and Uses
Effectiveness Evaluation Workshop
Victoria, November 7, 2002
Tom Niemann, Ministry of Forests
Why report? BC’s forest policy development
Results based code Tenure policy Land use planning
Why report? BC’s forest policy development Market access
information on SFM certification
Why report? BC’s forest policy development Market access Public’s keen interest in SFM
environment jobs recreation
Why report? BC’s forest policy development Market access Public’s keen interest in SFM Federal commitments
Montreal Process C&I CCFM C&I National Forest Strategy
Why report? BC’s forest policy development Market access Public’s keen interest in SFM Federal commitments
One set of indicators? Report once for all?
What Audiences? Policy makers
JMC JSC Cabinet
What Audiences? Policy makers Industry audiences
workers, shareholders buyers, consumers certification auditors
What Audiences? Policy makers Industry audiences Public (BC and international)
individuals (well informed and not) media communities (PAGs, local government) NGOs
What Audiences? Policy makers Industry audiences Public (BC and international) Agencies
Forest Practices Board BC Timber Sales federal
Policy makers Industry audiences Public (BC and international) Agencies
Some indicators can serve several.Different reports!
What Audiences?
Reporting Issues?
Inform? or Persuade?
Reporting Issues?
Inform? Support dialogue on SFM
Balanced, credible Good news and bad news Avoid bias in:
selection of indicators assessment of indicators presentation of results
Reporting Issues?
Inform? or Persuade? Support change in
policy programs for monitoring, research… opinions
Methods and data are IMPECCABLE! Results are JUST SUPER!
May backfire
Reporting Issues?
Inform? or Persuade? Scale
FMU, province, nation, global Values, monitoring methods vary with scale
TSAs, TFLs: 10,000 ha - 14,800,000 ha
“Rolling up” data often does not work Ecosystems cross administrative borders,
so TEAM UP!
Reporting Issues?
Inform? or Persuade? Scale Time period
Trends are more important than state Choice of reporting period can change
apparent trend Forecasts
Time period
time
aspect
Time period
time
aspect
Time period
time
aspect
Time period
time
aspect ?
Reporting Issues?
Inform? or Persuade? Scale Time period Only a few evaluations per year
Values change over time FPC 1995, 2002 CCFM C&I 1995, 2003
Can we assess SFM?
Reporting Issues?
Inform? or Persuade? Scale Time period Only a few evaluations per year Thresholds
scientific, public, political often difficult or unknown What if only 1 of 6 evaluations > threshold?
Reporting Issues?
Inform? or Persuade? Scale Time period Only a few evaluations per year Thresholds Uncertainty and Risk
When do we know policy needs to change? Accountability (“blame”)
Summary
Reporting is not simple Effectiveness evaluations can inform
a variety of reports We have to look for synergies,
a.k.a. cost savings Co-operation will help us make
progress towards SFM…..
Blank slide
Sustainable forest management
Management to maintain and enhance the long-term health of forest ecosystems, while providing ecological, economic, social, and cultural opportunities for the benefit of present and future generations. Canadian Council of Forest Ministers, 1992
Montreal Process criteria
1. Conservation of biological diversity
2. Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems
3. Maintenance of forest ecosystem health and vitality
4. Conservation and maintenance of soil and water resources
5. Maintenance of forest contribution to global carbon cycles
6. Maintenance and enhancement of long-term multiple socio-economic benefits to meet the needs of societies
7. Legal, institutional and economic framework for forest conservation and sustainable management
Example: MP Indicators1.1 Ecosystem diversity
Extent of area by forest type relative to total forest area Extent of area by forest type and by age class or
successional stage Extent of forest type in protected area categories (IUCN or
other) Extent of area by forest type in protected areas defined by
age class or successsional stage Fragmentation of forest types
1.2 Species diversity (2 indicators)
1.3 Genetic diversity (2 indicators)
Canadian (CCFM) criteria
1. Conservation of biological diversity
2. Maintenance and enhancement of forest ecosystem condition and productivity
3. Conservation of soil and water
4. Forest ecosystem contribution to global ecological cycles
5. Multiple benefits to society
6. Accepting society’s responsibility for sustainable development
Example: CCFM Indicators1.1 Ecosystem diversity
% and extent, in area, of forest types relative to historical condition and to total forest area
% and extent of area by forest type and age class 1.1.3 area, % and representativeness of forest
types in protected areas level of fragmentation and connectedness of
forest ecosystem components.
1.2 Species diversity (3 indicators)
1.3 Genetic diversity (1 indicator)
Canadian (CCFM) C&I documents
Defining SFM (CCFM C&I) - 1995
C&I of SFM, Progress to date - 1997 C&I of SFM, Technical report - 1997
First national report on C&I - 2000(62 of 83 indicators)
Technical Challenges
understanding data sources data standards data quality clear definitions sampling designs trend detection analytical tools efficient processes
consistent reporting accessibility of
information security of proprietary
data qualitative changes
over time archiving information
Administrative Challenges
commitment budget reductions staff workloads
partnerships management cycle
Political Challenges
commitment process scope / jurisdiction potential for impact
Management Cycle
Plan
Set Objectives
ImplementEvaluate
Monitor
Adjust
Management Cycle
Plan
Set Objectives
ImplementEvaluate
Monitor
Adjust
Presentation policy makers, public, agencies
relevant to values/issues credible, comprehensive indicators clear, concise language
people with little time clear design to help find parts of interest
domestic and international Canadian values clear links to international work
Top-down and bottom-upGeneralities Sustainable
forestmanagement
Goal Vision
Maintainbiodiversity
Principle Wisdom
Ecosystemdiversity
Criterion Knowledge
Old growth Indicator Information
Specifics CarmanahGiant
Observation Data