report on the improved rmtn project contents 1. background 2. status of progress of the improved...
TRANSCRIPT
Report Report oonn the Improved RMTN project the Improved RMTN project
Contents1. Background2. Status of progress of the improved RMTN 2.1 Implementation of circuits 2.2 Migration to TCP/IP 2.3 Seeking cost-effective connections 2.3.1 Frame Relay services 2.3.2 IP-VPN services 2.3.3 Internet links 2.4 Complementary systems 2.4.1 Satellite broadcasting 2.4.2 Internet server systems3. Prospect on foundations of the Improved RMTN 3.1 IMTN Network II (a core of the Improved RMTN) 3.2 Understanding of network service providers 3.3 Asian market of network services4. Suggestions in further improving Submitted By Hiroyuki Ichijo (Japan)
Rapporteur on the improved RMTN
Doc. 3.3 (2) Presentation versionRA II/ICM-GTS 2003 (Moscow, 8 to 10 September 2003)
1. Background
Strengthen the overall GTS capabilitieswith cost-effectiveness and technical trends Migration to
TCP/IPUse of managed
data network services
Feasibility study
Improved MTN project
Collaborative implementationby a small number ofmanaged networks
Improved RMTN project ideas1999
endorsed by RA II 12th session
• Implementation of several networks with appropriate groups• Step by step approach towards ultimate goal of collaborative implementation
2000
2003 Collaborative implementationof Networks I and II
Step by step implementationon bilateral basis
a core
2004
Practical discussion andcoordination by ET-IMTN • Administrative issues• Implementation plan by Networks I and II
2001
2002
Practical discussion and coordination by each group Training
Seminar
A possible configuration of the improved RMTN
Zone ofresponsibility of RTH Tokyo
Zone ofresponsibility ofRTH New Delhi
Zone ofresponsibility ofRTH Tashkent
Zone ofresponsibility of RTH Beijing
Zone ofresponsibility of RTH Bangkok
Zone ofresponsibility ofRTH Novosibirsk
Zone ofresponsibility ofRTH Khabarovsk
Zone ofresponsibility ofRTH Jeddah
Zone ofresponsibility ofRTH Tehran
Improved RMTNEastern part (Group
IIA) NetworkImproved RMTN
Southern part (Group IIB) Network
Improved RMTNWestern part (Group IIC)
Network
Improved RMTNNorthern part (Group IID) Network
Tokyo
Tehran
Khabarovsk
Tashkent Novosibirsk
Bangkok
Moscow
JeddahNew Delhi
Beijing
Improved MTN Network II
Offenbach
2. Status of progress of the improved RMTN
Objectives of the first stage:
1) Migration to TCP/IP for saving the both of costs and human resources allowing latitude in selecting a network service
2) Extrication from expensive leased circuits for saving recurrent costs obtaining flexible connectivity Seeking cost-effective alternatives to leased circuits, Frame Relay, IP-VPN … Use of the Internet is now being discussed by many
centres.
2.1 Implementation of circuits Regional plan : 78 circuits Implemented : 67 circuits Implementation rate : 86 % (as of Aug. 2003)
Progress of improvement in circuit speed in RA II
3833 32 28 28
21
22
18 18
159
5
310 11
1825
33
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Feb 1997 Aug 1999 Sep 2000 Jan 2002 Aug 2003 2005 (plan)
More than9600bps
2400 to 9600(inclusive)
less than2400bps
The numberof circuits
NMCs Baghdad, Kabul and Phnom Penh are isolated from the GTS. Low speed circuits are still more than half.
2.2 Migration to TCP/IP
Achievement rate : about 35% ( as of August 2003)
Estimation rate : over 50% by the end of 2005
Progress in migration to TCP/IP in RA II
0
10
20
30
40
50
Feb 1997 Aug 1999 Sep 2000 Jan 2002 Aug 2003 2005 (plan)
Additional circuits
Interregional circuits
Regional circuits
MTN circuits
number of circuits
2.3 Seeking cost-effective connections
Bilateral basis FR : 6 circuitsCollaborative FR : 3 circuits (as of August 2003)
2.3.1 Frame Relay services
Growth in introducing of Frame Relay circuits in RA II
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Feb 1997 Aug 1999 Sep 2000 Jan 2002 Aug 2003 2005 (plan)
Additional circuits
Interregional circuits
Regional circuits
MTN circuits
number of circuits
Two approaches to establish Frame Relay links
Bilateral basis approach(improved RMTN Group IIA
strategy)
Collaborative approach (IMTN project)
Administrative view
Multi-end-contract# the traditional peer-to-peer method for GTS circuits# Easy to coordinate
One-stop-contract# a new collaborative framework among centres# Not easy to coordinate
Technical view
Network-to-Network Interconnection (NNI)
# Inter-connection of two providers / telecom carriers# Committed Information Rate (CIR) : Symmetric only
Seamless connection# connection through a network managed by a single provider# Committed Information Rate : Symmetric or Asymmetric
Bilateral basis approach (Strategy of the improved RMTN Group IIA)
InternationalTelecom.Carrier
X
NMHSA
InternationalTelecom.Carrier
Y
NMHSB
contractual boundarybetween X and Y
• Contract between A and X• Payment for the X portion to the
boundary
• Contract between B and Y• Payment for the Y portion to the
boundary
Bill
Payment
Bill
Payment
Tariff of Xin the localcurrency
Tariff of Yin the localcurrency
Traditional method : bilateral contract/billing
Frame RelayNetwork
X
Frame RelayNetwork
YNNI
Collaborative approach (IMTN project)New method : one-stop concept(a) one-stop contract/billing
NMHS A(Primary customer)
NMHS B(Secondary customer)
Customer A
• Contract between A and X• Payment for the total charge from A to X
Provider X
Bill
Payment
Customers B & C
Tariff of Xin a majorcurrency• In accordance with MoU
the payment is recovered from B and C
Network
supplied by
a single provider X
NMHS C(Secondary customer)
MoUamongcustomers
(b) one-stop contract & multi-end billing
• Contract between A and X• Individual bill and payment
based on charge rules agreed by customers
Provider X
Bill
Payment
Tariff of Xin a majorcurrency
• MoU includes charge rules
MoUamongcustomers
NMHS A(Primary customer)
NMHS B(Secondary customer)
Bill
Bill Payment
Payment
NMHS C(Secondary customer)
Network
supplied by
a single provider X
2.3.2 IP-VPN servicesThere is no VPN circuit in RA II.One of VPN services is IP-VPN which is different in backbone management from Internet VPN.
Provider’s PEs and Core Routers based on MPLS have Label Tables and switch IP packets forward according to the Tables.
CE : Customer Edge Router VPN : Virtual Private Network PE : Provider Edge Router MPLS : Multi Protocol Label Switching
Closed
IP networkby a provider
CE PE
CE PE
CE
CE
IP IP Label IP Label
Core Router
Core RouterCore Router
PE
IP
VPN group
VPN group
IP-VPN with MPLS
IPsec VPN products add/remove the ESP for encryption and encapsulation and the AH for authentication to/from an IP packet.
ESP : Encapsulation Secure Payload AH : Authentication Header
InternetIPsec Product
ESP AH IP
VPN group
VPN group
IPsec Product
IP ESP AH
IP
IP
IPsec Product
Internet VPN with IPsec
2.3.3 Internet links
Current : 5 circuits (as of August 2003)
Estimation : 9 circuits by the end of 2005
Growth in GTS circuits through the Internet in RA II
0
2
4
6
8
10
Feb 1997 Aug 1999 Sep 2000 Jan 2002 Aug 2003 2005 (plan)
Additional circuits
Interregional circuits
Regional circuits
MTN circuits
number of circuits
2.4 Complementary systems
• Being used for a complement of GTS point-to-point links and a backup source.
• PCVSAT (2-way) by China, TV-inform-Meteo by Russia, Data broadcast through World Space Satellite Digital Audio Broadcast by India, MDD by EUMETSAT, WAFS (ISCS, SADIS) and UKSF/WWW
2.4.1 Satellite broadcasting systems
Broadcast type DAB: Digital Audio Broadcasting DVB: Digital Video Broadcasting
2 way VSAT type
SADIS/UKSF (WAFS broadcast / WWW data by UK satellite Facility)
INTELSAT
VSAT 2.5m Antenna
Workstation
GTS
WMO MessageSwitching System
64KbpsLeased Line
Satellite UplinkFacilityin WhiteHill, UK WWW 64Kbps X25
19.2Kbps X25
9.6Kbps Async.
Satellite Broadcast Receiving Only System
SADIS 64Kbps X25
UK Met. Office, Bracknell
64KbpsBackup Line
Test Facilityin Poynton, UK
Digital ReceiveOnly Unit (DRO)
ISDN
INTELSAT
VSAT 2.5m Antenna
Workstation
GTSGTS
WMO MessageSwitching System
64KbpsLeased Line
Satellite UplinkFacilityin WhiteHill, UK WWW 64Kbps X25
19.2Kbps X25
9.6Kbps Async.
Satellite Broadcast Receiving Only System
SADIS 64Kbps X25
UK Met. Office, Bracknell
64KbpsBackup Line
Test Facilityin Poynton, UK
Digital ReceiveOnly Unit (DRO)
ISDNISDN
2.4.2 Internet server systems
• With improving Internet connectivity of Members, Internet data serving method is becoming one of convenient and promising complement systems.
• A number of RTHs/NMCs operate their own servers and provide WWW data.We must keep track of both of positive and negative aspects of the
Internet !
Heavy load
Hiddencost
Positive aspect : Good opportunities for innovation
EC site, Video on Demand, Network GameMusic & Movie streaming, On-line shopping
Home security
INTERNETINTERNET anytime, anywhere, anyone any medium, any contents
The Internet always leads IT innovation
Negative aspect : Security risks
INTERNETINTERNET
There are bad guys in the world
Target hostsTarget hosts
Step hosts with Step hosts with security holessecurity holes
Attack Attack triggertrigger
Simultaneous Simultaneous attacksattacks
Step mail Step mail servers with servers with security holessecurity holes
SpamSpam
Victims Victims
Feb. 1991
June 1997
Internet diffusion
INTERNEINTERNETT
Internet full connectivity
Not Internet but Bitnet
E-mail only (UUCP etc)
No connectivity
Internet full connectivity
Not Internet but Bitnet
E-mail only (UUCP etc)
No connectivity
3 Prospect on foundations of the Improved RMTN
• The IMTN project is now in the implementation stage and will be completed in 2004.
• The IMTN Network II is established as extension of RA VI RMDCN which is a well managed Frame Relay network under the contract between ECMWF and Equant.
• Beijing already has joined the RMDCN. New Delhi, Jeddah and Tokyo will join soon.
3.1 IMTN Network II (a core of the Improved RMTN)
Bracknell
Sofia
Network IINetwork II
Melbourne
Buenos Aires
TokyoBeijing
New Delhi
Nairobi
Cairo
Toulouse
Dakar
Algiers
MoscowWashington
Brasilia
Network INetwork I
Offenbach
Jeddah
Prague
3.2 Understanding of network service providers
• Find the right price
Cut-price with an excessive discount often means a trade-off in service quality. We must keep a balance between price and quality in our minds.
• Assess the quality
We should try to understand each provider’s specific characteristics in backbone network, reliability and availability, performance such as burst limits and round-trip delay, and support capabilities such as help desk services, monitoring and report procedures and local language support.
• Understand difficulties
* PTT monopoly often makes a network service less reliable and more expensive.
* In case of a bilateral connection, nothing goes well without technical compatibility and a contractual agreement between PTTs.
* In case of a seamless connection by a single provider, it is very hard to coordinate administrative issues on one-stop basis among individual NMHSs and the provider.
3.3 Asian market of network service providers
• Generally the Asian telecom market is inactive except for the Internet business since the recent recession. New investments by global network service providers have inclined to concentrate on potential markets such as China and India.
• Although each country’s PTT is trying to gradually phase out legacy facilities, its progress is slow in some countries of PTT monopoly. Such poor domestic infrastructure affects reliability and cost-effectiveness of international connections.
• Increasing the number of available providers in eastern Asia has ceased and then unbelievable discounting in late 1990s is coming to an end.
• In business use, the network trend is gradually moving from Frame Relay to VPN services. IP-VPN services are currently available domestically in developed countries and being available internationally among big cities in the world. The coverage of TCP/IP based services will expand on the worldwide level absorbing traditional telephone networks.
4. Suggestions in further improving
1) Acceleration of TCP/IP migration All of RMTN circuits in RA II should migrate to pure TCP/IP links with a first priority in the first step. Delay of implementation in one centre may extinguish the whole benefit.
Some NMCs have difficulties in TCP/IP migration. Their telecom systems are already obsolete and have no capability to handle the TCP/IP protocol suite. Lack of expertise and funds definitely obstructs replacement of their systems. Technical and financial support in the early stage of the transition will be effective for promotion of the migration. Related RTHs and WMO Secretariat should consider possible support.
2) Selecting an appropriate network service with a possible framework There are options in cost-effective network services (i.e. FR, IP-VPN).Regarding the contract aspect, in addition to a bilateral framework which is the current strategy, a one-stop collaboration is becoming an option (e.g. further extension of the IMTN Network II).
Since there are various differences in technical developments and administrative conditions from part to part in RA II, an appropriate network service and its contractual framework are not to be always the same.
Each group and/or part (an RTH and NMCs concerned) should examine and discuss their best solution. In other words, an appropriate network service with a possible contractual framework should be selected by each group/part.
3) Use of the Internet for a GTS circuit as the very end solution The use of the Internet is one of convenient solutions to upgrade the current GTS circuits, especially asynchronous low speed ones.But there are serious risks in security and performance guarantee, as well-known. At present, all centre should first challenge the ordinary approach to the best solution. If the ordinary approach would be very difficult, the Internet use should be considered. In case of GTS circuits through the Internet, introduce of VPN techniques is recommended according to “Guide on Virtual Private Networks (VPN) via the Internet between GTS centres” developed by OPAG-ISS.
4) Practical use of consulting and marketing companies It is desirable to use detailed survey reports provided by telecom consulting and marketing companies in identifying available and adequate data communication services and network providers for RMTN and also national networks.
5) Building up technical information to help NMCs facing difficulty The on-line information resources on the GTS are available on the WMO Web server. Although this site is very useful for all the GTS centres, there seems be still room for improvement and enhancement. WMO Secretariat should strengthen the on-line information resources on the GTS from the view to help small NMCs having no expertise in cooperation with voluntary experts. In this regard, here are some ideas from GTS colleagues:• to add easier contents aiming at a newcomer to telecom section, beginner’s dictionary and necessary extractions from textbooks;
• to increase trivial but necessary tips in the implementation collected from centres;
• to add the latest information on telecom marketing and network providers;
• to update contents timely;
• to build a virtual help desk to answer questions from NMCs and to prepare FAQ.
Current status of RMTN in RA II (as of August 25, 2003)
Vientiane
Ulaanbaatar
Baghdad
Doha
Kuwait
Bahrain
Dhaka
Yangon
Kathmandu
Kabul
Karachi
ColomboMale
Hanoi
Phnom Penh
PyongYang
Ashgabad
Macao
64K
14.4K
Dushanbe
Almaty
NI
NI
NI
NI
Seoul
NI
NI
NI
7.2-28.8K (V.34)
64K
9.6K
2.4K
9.6K
4.8K
64K
128K
7.2K
64K
50
50
50
50
50
64K
100
200
1200
1200
1200
2.4K
100
100
100
200
75
75
75
1200
75
50
100
75100
100
7575
9.6K
Melbourne
Offenbach
Offenbach
Cairo
Cairo
Algiers
Moscow
Kuala Lumpur
Tashkent
Novosibirsk Khabarovsk
Bangkok
Frame RelayCIR<16/16K>
Frame RelayCIR<16/16K>
Melbourne
Washington
Frame RelayCIR<16/16K>
NI
NI 9.6-28.8K (V.34)
9.6-19.2K (V.34)
19.2-24K (V.34)
Bishkek
64K
2.4K
Singapore
Internet
9.6K
RTH in Region II
NMC in Region II
Centre in other region
MTN circuitRegional circuitInterregional circuitAdditional circuit
Non-IP linkIP link
NI No implementation7.2-28.8K
(V.34)
Tehran
Sanaa200
Hong Kong
Moscow
NIFrame Relay
CIR<32/32K>
64K
Frame RelayCIR<32/32K>
Tokyo
Beijing
Frame RelayCIR<16/16K>
200
New Delhi
Frame RelayCIR<32/768K>
Frame RelayCIR<16/32K>
Manila
Frame RelayCIR<48/48K>
7.2-28.8K (V.34)
via Moscow
Internet
-32.5K (V.34)via Moscow
Jeddah
Internet Internet
Internet
Muscat
Emirates
Plans of RMTN in RA II for 2003-2005
Vientiane
Ulaanbaatar
Baghdad
Doha
Kuwait
Bahrain
Dhaka
Yangon
Kathmandu
Kabul
Karachi
ColomboMale
Hanoi
Phnom Penh
PyongYang
Ashgabad
Macao
64K
Dushanbe
Almaty
NI
NI
NI
NI
Seoul
NI
NI
NI
7.2-28.8K(V.34)
64K
9.6K
64K
9.6K
64K
128K
64K
50
50
64K100
200
1200
2.4K100
200
75
75
1200
75
50
100
75100
100
7575
9.6K
Melbourne
Offenbach
Offenbach
Cairo
Moscow
Kuala Lumpur
Tashkent
NovosibirskKhabarovsk
Bangkok
Frame RelayCIR<16/16K>
Frame RelayCIR<16/16K>
Melbourne
Frame RelayCIR<16/16K>
NI
NI9.6-28.8K (V.34)
9.6-19.2K (V.34)
19.2-24K (V.34)
Bishkek
64K
Singapore
9.6K
RTH in Region II
NMC in Region II
Centre in other region
MTN circuitRegional circuitInterregional circuitAdditional circuit
Non-IP linkIP link Plan
NI No implementation
7.2-28.8K(V.34)
Tehran
Sanaa200
Hong Kong
Moscow
NIFrame Relay
CIR<32/32K>
Frame RelayCIR<48/48K>
Tokyo
Beijing
Frame RelayCIR<16/16K>
200
New Delhi
Frame RelayCIR<16/32K>
Manila
Frame RelayCIR<48/48K>
7.2-28.8K(V.34)via Moscow
-32.5K(V.34)via Moscow
Frame RelayCIR<8/8K>
Frame RelayCIR<16/16K>
Internet
64K
64K
64K
Frame RelayCIR<16/16K>
Frame Relay
14.4-28.8K(V.34)
Internet
Internet InternetInternet
Internet Internet
Internet
Jeddah
Muscat
Emirates
Internet
75
50
Cairo
Algiers
64K
Frame RelayCIR<32/768K>
Washington