report on detailed site investigation (contamination

Report onDetailed Site Investigation (Contamination)

Proposed Parkes HospitalNewell Highway, Parkes

Prepared forHealth Infrastructure

Project 73466.01December 2013

Detailed Site Investigation (Contamination), Proposed Parkes Hospital Project 73466.01Newell Highway, Parkes December 2013

Table of Contents

Page

1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1

2. Previous Investigations .................................................................................................................. 2

3. Site Description .............................................................................................................................. 2

4. Regional Geology and Hydrogeology ............................................................................................ 3

5. Scope of Works .............................................................................................................................. 3

6. Site History ..................................................................................................................................... 4

6.1 Aerial Photographs ..............................................................................................................4

6.2 Historical Land Titles............................................................................................................4

6.3 Section 149 Certificate .........................................................................................................4

6.4 Contaminated Lands Register .............................................................................................4

6.5 Licenced Groundwater Bores ..............................................................................................4

7. Conceptual Site Model ................................................................................................................... 4

8. Selected Comparative Guidelines .................................................................................................. 5

9. Data Quality Objectives .................................................................................................................. 5

10. Field Work Procedures ................................................................................................................... 6

10.1 Soils Assessment .................................................................................................................6

10.2 Stockpile Assessment ..........................................................................................................6

10.3 Groundwater Assessment ...................................................................................................7

11. Results of Assessment ................................................................................................................... 7

11.1 Field Work Results ...............................................................................................................7

11.2 Total Photoionisable Compounds Results ...........................................................................7

11.3 Analytical Results for Soil Samples .....................................................................................7

11.4 Field and Laboratory Quality Control Procedures ...............................................................8

12. Discussion of Results ..................................................................................................................... 8

12.1 In Situ Soil Contamination ...................................................................................................8

12.2 Stockpile Contamination ......................................................................................................8

13. Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................. 8

14. References ..................................................................................................................................... 9

15. Limitations .................................................................................................................................... 10


Appendices

Appendix A: About this Report

Appendix B: Drawing

Appendix C: Site History Information

Appendix D: Sampling and Analysis Quality Plan

Appendix E: Field Work Results

Appendix F: Summary of Laboratory Test Results

Appendix G: Detailed Laboratory Test Results

Appendix H: QA/QC Information

Appendix I: PID Calibration Details

of 10


Report on Detailed Site Investigation (Contamination) Proposed Parkes Hospital Newell Highway, Parkes

1. Introduction

This report presents the results of a Detailed Site Investigation (Contamination) undertaken on the site of the proposed new Parkes District Hospital off the Newell Highway, Parkes. The work was commissioned by Health Infrastructure, in consultation with TSA Management Pty Ltd, project managers.

The project involves the construction of a new hospital to service the Parkes district. Health Infrastructure is currently in the process of purchasing an 11.8 ha site to the south of the town centre which will be the site of the new hospital and related facilities. The site is primarily vacant and was Crown Land at the time of the assessment.

The detailed contamination assessment was undertaken to:

Compliment a preliminary contamination assessment undertaken on the site by Douglas Partners in May 2013;

Assess the general levels of soil contamination resulting from past and present activities on the site;

Assess the general levels of groundwater contamination if groundwater is encountered within 6 m of the surface;

Assess the general levels of contamination in several small stockpiles of soil that are located on the site;

Assess the suitability of the site for the proposed hospital development; and

Provide recommendations for remediation works, if required.

The overall approach for the detailed contamination assessment included a review of available historical information, the drilling of 139 boreholes on the site, soil sampling from each of the boreholes as well as 16 small stockpiles, laboratory analysis of soil samples and interpretation of the results. Details of the site history, field work and laboratory testing programme are given in this report, as well as comments on the issues outlined above.

The scope of the detailed contamination investigation has been prepared with reference to the newly adopted National Environment Protection Measure (NEPM) guidelines where possible. However, it is noted that the scope of the investigation was largely prepared prior to the formal adoption of the NEPM guidelines and therefore Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme (NSW DECC, 2006) has also been used where relevant. This is approach is understood to be acceptable to the NSW EPA as both these guidelines remain current and legally acceptable under the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997.

of 10


A geotechnical investigation was undertaken at the same time as the detailed contamination assessment and is reported separately.

2. Previous Investigations

Douglas Partners undertook a Preliminary Geotechnical and Phase 1 Contamination Assessment on four shortlisted hospital sites in May 2013 (Project 73466). The purpose of the preliminary assessments was to aid in the selection of the preferred site from the four shortlisted sites.

The preliminary assessment on the selected site involved a site inspection by a Senior Engineer and a review of available documentation including published geological and soil landscape maps, historical aerial photographs, historical land title information, notices issued under the Contaminated Lands Management Act 1997, and groundwater bore licences.

The preliminary assessment concluded that the site appears to have primarily been used for agricultural-type purposes. There are no agricultural sheds on the site and aerial photographs suggest such sheds have never been present, and therefore the risks associated with the storage of pesticides, herbicides and fuel is considered to be low. The site was covered with vegetation at the time of the inspection and therefore the risks associated with excessive concentrations of herbicides in the near-surface soils are also considered to be low.

The surrounding sites are primarily used for farming, grazing and/or residential purposes and the risks associated with contamination from adjacent sites are considered to be low. The inferred depth of groundwater (probably >20 m depth) suggests that the quality of the groundwater should be somewhat irrelevant for the proposed development.

On this basis, no major contamination issues that would preclude development on this site were identified from the preliminary assessment.

3. Site Description

The site is near-rectangular and approximately 11.8 ha in total area. It is bounded by the Newell Highway to the west and generally vacant land to the north, south and east. The site slopes downwards to the north-west; the grades are generally steeper at the south-eastern corner and flatten towards the north-west.

At the time of the assessment the site was vacant apart from a small, partially demolished building midway along the northern boundary. There was established vegetation scattered across the majority of the site. Several small stockpiles of material (generally less than 10 m3) were also scattered across the site.

The site is defined as being Lot 550 in Deposited Plan (DP) 750179 and the western portion of Lot 7313 in DP 1147330, immediately to the north of the larger lot. The location of the site and the site boundaries are shown in Drawing C1 in Appendix B.

of 10


4. Regional Geology and Hydrogeology

The Forbes 1:250 000 Geological Series Sheet indicates that the site is close to a boundary between colluvial soils, and rocks of the Forbes Group and of the Cotton Formation. The Forbes Group comprises fine grained sandstone, siltstone, mudstone, polymictic calcareous conglomerate, sandstone and limestone lenses. The Cotton Formation comprises siltstone, chert, sandstone, marl, minor limestone and conglomerate. The colluvial soils are presumably underlain by one or both of these formations.

The Forbes 1:250 000 Soil Landscape Series Sheet indicates that the bedrock is overlain by erosional soils of the Parkes and Bald Hill groups. These soils are likely to be of residual origin.

The regional groundwater table is likely to be at a significant depth (i.e. >20 m) based on the standing water levels recorded in the licenced wells in and around Parkes. The surface water is likely to follow the ground topography and flow in a north-westerly direction towards the Newell Highway.

5. Scope of Works

The scope of the detailed contamination assessment was as follows:

Review various historical documents including title deeds, aerial photographs, the EPA Contaminated Land register and groundwater bore licences to determine the nature of previous activities that may have occurred on the site;

The preparation of a Sampling and Analysis Quality Plan (SAQP) which outlines the objectives of the detailed contamination assessment;

Drill 139 boreholes on the site and collect soil samples from the filling (if present) and natural soil horizons;

Collect soil samples from several small stockpiles on the site;

Install four groundwater monitoring wells if groundwater is encountered within the assessment depth of 6 m;

Screen soil samples with a calibrated Photoionisation Detector (PID) to assess the presence of volatile organic compounds;

Analyse selected soil samples and groundwater samples (if encountered) at a NATA accredited laboratory for a range of potential contaminants;

Provide a detailed contamination assessment report which comments on the recorded levels of contamination in the soils and groundwater on the site, the suitability of the site for the proposed development, and recommendations for follow up action (if required); and

Store remaining soil and groundwater samples not analysed for a period of one month pending the need for further analysis.

of 10


6. Site History

6.1 Aerial Photographs

Aerial photographs from 1955, 1965, 1973, 1980, 1983, 1989, 1993, 2000, 2004 and 2013 were used to assess historical land-use patterns on the site. The site appears vacant and sparsely vegetated in all photographs up to and including 2013. A small brick building (now partially demolished) first appears in the 1989 photo. No other improvements are evident from the photographs. The photographs are attached in Appendix C.

6.2 Historical Land Titles

Historical land title deeds were obtained for the site. The site is Crown Land and has been used as a State Forrest and by the Boy Scouts in the past. There is nothing noted in the title information to suggest any potentially contaminating activity has been undertaken on the site. The deed information is provided in Appendix C.

6.3 Section 149 Certificate

There is no Section 149 Certificate for this site as it is Crown Land.

6.4 Contaminated Lands Register

The site is not identified as being significantly contaminated under the Contaminated Lands Management Act 1997 as at 21 October 2013.

6.5 Licenced Groundwater Bores

There are several licenced groundwater bores in the southern region of Parkes. Drawing GW-S in Appendix C shows the locations of the wells. The installation details for selected wells indicate water depths of between 5 m and 51 m as shown on the drawing. Records for the other wells did not provide water level information.

7. Conceptual Site Model

The preliminary assessment indicated that the risk of site contamination is low. The Conceptual Site Model (CSM) is therefore relatively simple on the basis of the information currently available. Potential soil contamination may be present as a result of:

Placement of soil stockpiles or other filling on the site, the origin of which is unknown;

of 10


Previously contaminating activities such as pesticide use, herbicide use, the use of fertilisers (e.g. superphosphate), temporary fuel storage for farm machinery etc. which may have occurred in the past. It is noted that there is currently no evidence of such activities having occurred; and

Naturally occurring metals in the soils and rock underlying the site.

The potential for groundwater contamination will depend on the depth to groundwater. Agriculture is the primary land use up-slope of the site and therefore if groundwater flow follows the natural topography of the site, chemical use on up-gradient sites may have had an impact on groundwater quality.

Soil vapour intrusion is currently considered to be a very low risk on the site and will only be considered if volatile contaminants are encountered during the assessment.

The human receptors to soil and groundwater contamination are likely to be the hospital staff, hospital patients and hospital visitors. Construction personnel and nearby residents may also be receptors during the construction phase of the project.

The ecological receptors are likely to be limited to the flora and fauna that grow/live on the site and visit the site. The area is not known to be ecologically significant.

Exposure pathways are expected to be limited to dermal contact with soils on the site by humans, ingestion of soils and vegetation by fauna, and phytotoxic exposure to flora.

8. Selected Comparative Guidelines

The National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure, Schedule B1 – Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater (NEPC, 2013) provides assessment levels for various soil, groundwater and vapour contaminants. The site is assumed to be a commercial/industrial site for the health-based components of the assessment. The site categories for the ecological-based components were determined during the assessment (i.e. determined from soil types, pH and cation exchange capacities of the soils encountered).

The quantitative site assessment criteria adopted are shown in Table F4 in Appendix F.

9. Data Quality Objectives

The investigation procedures and data quality objectives have been devised in general accordance with the seven-step data quality objective (DQO) process outlined in Australian Standard AS 4482.1 – 2005 Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil – Part 1: Non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds. The various DQOs and QA/QC procedures adopted for the assessment are outlined in the SAQP which is included in Appendix D. They have not been duplicated within the body of this report.

of 10


10. Field Work Procedures

10.1 Soils Assessment

The field work for the soils assessment included the drilling of 139 boreholes, generally on a systematic grid across the site. The locations of the boreholes which were also used for geotechnical investigation and pavement subgrade investigation were selected on the basis of the proposed hospital layout. The bores drilled include PC1 to PC119 (in situ soil contamination only), PG1 to PG12 (in situ soil contamination and geotechnical assessment) and PP1 to PP8 (in situ soil contamination and pavement subgrade assessment).

The boreholes were drilled to depths of 0.75 m to 6.0 m (average depth 1.0 m) using either a truck-mounted Scout drilling rig or an auger mounted to a Bobcat. Sampling was undertaken from the auger which was considered an appropriate technique due to the strength of the soils encountered on the site and the fact that volatile contaminants were not identified as a major soil contamination risk. Mixing of soils from different depth profiles was minimised during sampling by careful drilling and supervision. The bores were backfilled at the completion of the field work.

Soil sampling for contamination assessment purposes was performed in general accordance with the standard sampling procedures outlined in the Douglas Partners Field Procedures Manual. All sampling data were recorded on chain-of-custody information sheets. The sampling generally included:

Soil sampling using decontaminated and/or disposable equipment;

Placement of samples into laboratory prepared jars and immediate capping;

Labelling of sample containers with individual and unique markings including project number, sample location, sample depth and date of sampling; and

Storage of sample containers in a cooled, insulated container for transport to the laboratory.

The ground surface levels at the boreholes were measured relative to Australian Height Datum (AHD) using a high-precision differential global positioning system (dGPS) receiver.

10.2 Stockpile Assessment

The field work for the stockpile assessment included collecting samples from small stockpiles scattered around the site. Sixteen stockpiles were assessed and samples were collected from approximately 0.5 m inside the exterior of each stockpile using decontaminated sampling equipment. Each stockpile was generally less than 10 m3.

Soil sampling was undertaken using the same methodology as that used for the in situ soils described above. The locations of the stockpiles were recorded using a high-precision dGPS receiver and are shown on Drawing C1 in Appendix B.

of 10


10.3 Groundwater Assessment

Groundwater was not encountered within 6 m of the surface and seepage was not observed in the bores 24 hours after the completion of drilling. As such, monitoring wells were not installed on the site and the assessment of groundwater quality is considered to be somewhat irrelevant for the proposed development. Licensed wells in the area of the site indicate groundwater may be 20 m or more below the ground surface levels.

11. Results of Assessment

11.1 Field Work Results

The subsurface conditions encountered in the boreholes are presented in the borehole logs in Appendix E. Notes defining descriptive terms and classification methods are included in Appendix A.

The boreholes generally encountered stiff to hard natural silty and clayey soils overlying porphyritic andesite bedrock. The soil profile was generally between 1 m and 1.5 m thick. Significant depths of filling were not encountered in the boreholes.

Free groundwater was not observed during the field work which indicates that groundwater is below RL 322 (AHD) in the lowest part of the site.

11.2 Total Photoionisable Compounds Results

Replicate soil samples collected from the boreholes were stored under ambient temperatures before screening for Total Photoionisable Compounds (TOPIC) using a calibrated Photoionisation Detector (PID). The results of the screening are shown on the borehole logs in Appendix E. The PID readings were all very low. A calibration certificate for the PID is included in Appendix I.

11.3 Analytical Results for Soil Samples

Envirolab Services Pty Ltd was commissioned to undertake analysis of the majority of the soil samples. Eurofins Environment Testing Australia Pty Ltd was commissioned to undertaken inter-lab QA/QC testing as per the SAQP. Tabulated summaries of the results of the soil analysis are provided in Appendix F. The summaries include Table F1 (Contaminant Concentrations in Soils), Table F2 (Contaminant Concentrations in QA/QC Samples), Table F3 (Statistical Analysis of Contaminant Concentrations) and Table F4 (Adopted Comparative Criteria).

The detailed analytical results, sample receipts and chain of custody documentation are included in Appendix G.

of 10


11.4 Field and Laboratory Quality Control Procedures

The field and laboratory QA/QC procedures adopted for the current assessment are described in Appendix H.

12. Discussion of Results

12.1 In Situ Soil Contamination

A total of 124 soil samples (excluding QA/QC samples) were selectively analysed from 139 boreholes drilled on the site. All samples were from the natural soil profile as in situ filling was not encountered. This testing frequency is considered sufficient for characterising the site. The rationale for selecting the test locations, depths and the testing frequency is provided in the SAQP in Appendix D.

Each of the soil samples analysed exhibited contaminant concentrations below the adopted health-based investigation/screening levels and the ecological-based investigation/screening levels. Further assessment of contaminant levels using statistical measures is therefore considered unnecessary.

Asbestos was not observed in the auger returns from the boreholes and was not detected in the selected samples analysed by the laboratory.

12.2 Stockpile Contamination

Fifteen soil samples were selectively analysed from the various small stockpiles observed on the site. All samples were assumed to be filling. Each of the stockpile samples analysed exhibited contaminant concentrations below the adopted health-based investigation/screening levels and the ecological-based investigation/screening levels.

Asbestos was not observed on the surface of the stockpiles and was not detected in the samples analysed by the laboratory.

13. Conclusions and Recommendations

The site history information indicates that the site has primarily been used for agricultural-type purposes. There are currently no agricultural sheds on the site and no evidence of sheds having previously been located on the site in the historical aerial photographs. The risks associated with the storage of pesticides, herbicides and fuel is therefore considered to be low. The site was covered with vegetation at the time of the inspection and therefore the risks associated with excessive concentrations of herbicides in the near-surface soils are also considered to be low. The surrounding sites are primarily used for farming, grazing and/or residential purposes and the risks associated with contamination from adjacent sites are also considered to be low.

of 10


The 124 soil samples analysed from the 139 borehole locations exhibited contaminant concentrations within the adopted assessment criteria for the site. The 15 stockpile samples analysed from the small stockpiles on the site also exhibited contaminant concentrations within the adopted assessment criteria.

Asbestos was not observed in the auger returns, on the surface of the stockpiles or within the laboratory samples analysed. It is noted, however, that the possibility of asbestos being present within the stockpiles should not be discounted as the origin of the filling is unknown and may be the result of illegal dumping activities. If found to be present, asbestos should be able to be readily dealt with by an experienced and suitably licenced contractor without affecting the land use suitability.

On the basis of the results of this detailed contamination assessment, the soils assessed are considered suitable for the proposed hospital development.

If the stockpiles are to be removed from the site as part of the development works, the results of this detailed assessment suggest that, apart from the stockpile from which sample PS10 was obtained, the materials would be classified as General Solid Waste (non-putrescible) in accordance with Waste Classification Guidelines (DECCW, 2009). Sample PS10 exhibited relatively high concentrations of PAHs and further waste classification would be required to determine appropriate disposal options for this stockpile.

The natural soils and bedrock underlying the site should be able to be disposed of as virgin excavated natural material (VENM) providing they are not cross-contaminated prior to, during or following excavation. Confirmation of VENM status will be required during construction.

Groundwater was not encountered within the assessment depth and is likely to be at considerable depth. The quality of the groundwater should therefore not hinder the proposed development of the site for the new Parkes District Hospital.

14. References

Australian Standard AS 4482.1 – 2005 Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil – Part 1: Non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds.

Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme (DECC NSW, 2006)

Contaminated Sites: Sampling Design Guidelines (NSW EPA, 1995)

Forbes 1:250 000 Geological Series Sheet, 1973.

Forbes 1:250 000 Soil Landscape Series Sheet, 1973.

National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure, Schedule B1 – Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater, (NEPC, 2013).

Waste Classification Guidelines (DECCW NSW, 2009).

of 10


15. Limitations

Douglas Partners Pty Ltd (DP) has prepared this report for the Parkes Hospital project off the Newell Highway, Parkes, in accordance with Contract HI13366P between Health Infrastructure and Douglas Partners. The report is provided for the use of Health Infrastructure for this project only and for the purpose(s) described in the report. It should not be used for other projects or by a third party.

The results provided in the report are indicative of the sub-surface conditions only at the specific sampling or testing locations, and then only to the depths investigated and at the time the work was carried out. Subsurface conditions can change abruptly due to variable geological processes and also as a result of anthropogenic influences. Such changes may occur after DP's field testing has been completed.

DP's advice is based upon the conditions encountered during this investigation. The accuracy of the advice provided by DP in this report may be limited by undetected variations in ground conditions between sampling locations. In preparing this report DP has necessarily relied upon information provided by the client and/or their agents.

This report must be read in conjunction with all of the attached notes and should be kept in its entirety without separation of individual pages or sections. DP cannot be held responsible for interpretations or conclusions made by others unless they are supported by an expressed statement, interpretation, outcome or conclusion given in this report.

This report, or sections from this report, should not be used as part of a specification for a project, without review and agreement by DP. This is because this report has been written as advice and opinion rather than instructions for construction.

Douglas Partners Pty Ltd

Appendix A

About this Report

July 2010

Introduction These notes have been provided to amplify DP's report in regard to classification methods, field procedures and the comments section. Not all are necessarily relevant to all reports.

DP's reports are based on information gained from limited subsurface excavations and sampling, supplemented by knowledge of local geology and experience. For this reason, they must be regarded as interpretive rather than factual documents, limited to some extent by the scope of information on which they rely.

Copyright This report is the property of Douglas Partners Pty Ltd. The report may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Conditions of Engagement for the commission supplied at the time of proposal. Unauthorised use of this report in any form whatsoever is prohibited.

Borehole and Test Pit Logs The borehole and test pit logs presented in this report are an engineering and/or geological interpretation of the subsurface conditions, and their reliability will depend to some extent on frequency of sampling and the method of drilling or excavation. Ideally, continuous undisturbed sampling or core drilling will provide the most reliable assessment, but this is not always practicable or possible to justify on economic grounds. In any case the boreholes and test pits represent only a very small sample of the total subsurface profile.

Interpretation of the information and its application to design and construction should therefore take into account the spacing of boreholes or pits, the frequency of sampling, and the possibility of other than 'straight line' variations between the test locations.

Groundwater Where groundwater levels are measured in boreholes there are several potential problems, namely: In low permeability soils groundwater may

enter the hole very slowly or perhaps not at all during the time the hole is left open;

A localised, perched water table may lead to an erroneous indication of the true water table;

Water table levels will vary from time to time with seasons or recent weather changes. They may not be the same at the time of construction as are indicated in the report; and

The use of water or mud as a drilling fluid will mask any groundwater inflow. Water has to be blown out of the hole and drilling mud must first be washed out of the hole if water measurements are to be made.

More reliable measurements can be made by installing standpipes which are read at intervals over several days, or perhaps weeks for low permeability soils. Piezometers, sealed in a particular stratum, may be advisable in low permeability soils or where there may be interference from a perched water table.

Reports The report has been prepared by qualified personnel, is based on the information obtained from field and laboratory testing, and has been undertaken to current engineering standards of interpretation and analysis. Where the report has been prepared for a specific design proposal, the information and interpretation may not be relevant if the design proposal is changed. If this happens, DP will be pleased to review the report and the sufficiency of the investigation work.

Every care is taken with the report as it relates to interpretation of subsurface conditions, discussion of geotechnical and environmental aspects, and recommendations or suggestions for design and construction. However, DP cannot always anticipate or assume responsibility for: Unexpected variations in ground conditions.

The potential for this will depend partly on borehole or pit spacing and sampling frequency;

Changes in policy or interpretations of policy by statutory authorities; or

The actions of contractors responding to commercial pressures.

If these occur, DP will be pleased to assist with investigations or advice to resolve the matter.

July 2010

Site Anomalies In the event that conditions encountered on site during construction appear to vary from those which were expected from the information contained in the report, DP requests that it be immediately notified. Most problems are much more readily resolved when conditions are exposed rather than at some later stage, well after the event.

Information for Contractual Purposes Where information obtained from this report is provided for tendering purposes, it is recommended that all information, including the written report and discussion, be made available. In circumstances where the discussion or comments section is not relevant to the contractual situation, it may be appropriate to prepare a specially edited document. DP would be pleased to assist in this regard and/or to make additional report copies available for contract purposes at a nominal charge.

Site Inspection The company will always be pleased to provide engineering inspection services for geotechnical and environmental aspects of work to which this report is related. This could range from a site visit to confirm that conditions exposed are as expected, to full time engineering presence on site.

July 2010

SamplingSampling is carried out during drilling or test pitting to allow engineering examination (and laboratory testing where required) of the soil or rock.

Disturbed samples taken during drilling provide information on colour, type, inclusions and, depending upon the degree of disturbance, some information on strength and structure.

Undisturbed samples are taken by pushing a thin-walled sample tube into the soil and withdrawing it to obtain a sample of the soil in a relatively undisturbed state. Such samples yield information on structure and strength, and are necessary for laboratory determination of shear strength and compressibility. Undisturbed sampling is generally effective only in cohesive soils.

Test Pits Test pits are usually excavated with a backhoe or an excavator, allowing close examination of the in-situ soil if it is safe to enter into the pit. The depth of excavation is limited to about 3 m for a backhoe and up to 6 m for a large excavator. A potential disadvantage of this investigation method is the larger area of disturbance to the site.

Large Diameter Augers Boreholes can be drilled using a rotating plate or short spiral auger, generally 300 mm or larger in diameter commonly mounted on a standard piling rig. The cuttings are returned to the surface at intervals (generally not more than 0.5 m) and are disturbed but usually unchanged in moisture content. Identification of soil strata is generally much more reliable than with continuous spiral flight augers, and is usually supplemented by occasional undisturbed tube samples.

Continuous Spiral Flight Augers The borehole is advanced using 90-115 mm diameter continuous spiral flight augers which are withdrawn at intervals to allow sampling or in-situ testing. This is a relatively economical means of drilling in clays and sands above the water table. Samples are returned to the surface, or may be collected after withdrawal of the auger flights, but they are disturbed and may be mixed with soils from the sides of the hole. Information from the drilling (as distinct from specific sampling by SPTs or undisturbed samples) is of relatively low

reliability, due to the remoulding, possible mixing or softening of samples by groundwater.

Non-core Rotary Drilling The borehole is advanced using a rotary bit, with water or drilling mud being pumped down the drill rods and returned up the annulus, carrying the drill cuttings. Only major changes in stratification can be determined from the cuttings, together with some information from the rate of penetration. Where drilling mud is used this can mask the cuttings and reliable identification is only possible from separate sampling such as SPTs.

Continuous Core Drilling A continuous core sample can be obtained using a diamond tipped core barrel, usually with a 50 mm internal diameter. Provided full core recovery is achieved (which is not always possible in weak rocks and granular soils), this technique provides a very reliable method of investigation.

Standard Penetration Tests Standard penetration tests (SPT) are used as a means of estimating the density or strength of soils and also of obtaining a relatively undisturbed sample. The test procedure is described in Australian Standard 1289, Methods of Testing Soils for Engineering Purposes - Test 6.3.1.

The test is carried out in a borehole by driving a 50 mm diameter split sample tube under the impact of a 63 kg hammer with a free fall of 760 mm. It is normal for the tube to be driven in three successive 150 mm increments and the 'N' value is taken as the number of blows for the last 300 mm. In dense sands, very hard clays or weak rock, the full 450 mm penetration may not be practicable and the test is discontinued.

The test results are reported in the following form. In the case where full penetration is obtained

with successive blow counts for each 150 mm of, say, 4, 6 and 7 as:

4,6,7N=13

In the case where the test is discontinued before the full penetration depth, say after 15 blows for the first 150 mm and 30 blows for the next 40 mm as:

15, 30/40 mm

July 2010

The results of the SPT tests can be related empirically to the engineering properties of the soils.

Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Tests / Perth Sand Penetrometer Tests Dynamic penetrometer tests (DCP or PSP) are carried out by driving a steel rod into the ground using a standard weight of hammer falling a specified distance. As the rod penetrates the soil the number of blows required to penetrate each successive 150 mm depth are recorded. Normally there is a depth limitation of 1.2 m, but this may be extended in certain conditions by the use of extension rods. Two types of penetrometer are commonly used. Perth sand penetrometer - a 16 mm diameter

flat ended rod is driven using a 9 kg hammer dropping 600 mm (AS 1289, Test 6.3.3). This test was developed for testing the density of sands and is mainly used in granular soils and filling.

Cone penetrometer - a 16 mm diameter rod with a 20 mm diameter cone end is driven using a 9 kg hammer dropping 510 mm (AS 1289, Test 6.3.2). This test was developed initially for pavement subgrade investigations, and correlations of the test results with California Bearing Ratio have been published by various road authorities.

July 2010

Description and Classification Methods The methods of description and classification of soils and rocks used in this report are based on Australian Standard AS 1726, Geotechnical Site Investigations Code. In general, the descriptions include strength or density, colour, structure, soil or rock type and inclusions.

Soil Types Soil types are described according to the predominant particle size, qualified by the grading of other particles present:

Type Particle size (mm) Boulder >200 Cobble 63 - 200 Gravel 2.36 - 63 Sand 0.075 - 2.36 Silt 0.002 - 0.075 Clay <0.002

The sand and gravel sizes can be further subdivided as follows:

Type Particle size (mm) Coarse gravel 20 - 63 Medium gravel 6 - 20 Fine gravel 2.36 - 6 Coarse sand 0.6 - 2.36 Medium sand 0.2 - 0.6 Fine sand 0.075 - 0.2

The proportions of secondary constituents of soils are described as:

Term Proportion Example And Specify Clay (60%) and

Sand (40%) Adjective 20 - 35% Sandy Clay Slightly 12 - 20% Slightly Sandy

Clay With some 5 - 12% Clay with some

sandWith a trace of 0 - 5% Clay with a trace

of sand

Definitions of grading terms used are: Well graded - a good representation of all

particle sizes Poorly graded - an excess or deficiency of

particular sizes within the specified range Uniformly graded - an excess of a particular

particle size Gap graded - a deficiency of a particular

particle size with the range

Cohesive Soils Cohesive soils, such as clays, are classified on the basis of undrained shear strength. The strength may be measured by laboratory testing, or estimated by field tests or engineering examination. The strength terms are defined as follows:

Description Abbreviation Undrained shear strength

(kPa)Very soft vs <12 Soft s 12 - 25 Firm f 25 - 50 Stiff st 50 - 100 Very stiff vst 100 - 200 Hard h >200

Cohesionless Soils Cohesionless soils, such as clean sands, are classified on the basis of relative density, generally from the results of standard penetration tests (SPT), cone penetration tests (CPT) or dynamic penetrometers (PSP). The relative density terms are given below:

Relative Density

Abbreviation SPT N value

CPT qc value(MPa)

Very loose vl <4 <2 Loose l 4 - 10 2 -5 Medium dense

md 10 - 30 5 - 15

Dense d 30 - 50 15 - 25 Very dense

vd >50 >25

July 2010

Soil Origin It is often difficult to accurately determine the origin of a soil. Soils can generally be classified as: Residual soil - derived from in-situ weathering

of the underlying rock; Transported soils - formed somewhere else

and transported by nature to the site; or Filling - moved by man.

Transported soils may be further subdivided into: Alluvium - river deposits Lacustrine - lake deposits Aeolian - wind deposits Littoral - beach deposits Estuarine - tidal river deposits Talus - scree or coarse colluvium Slopewash or Colluvium - transported

downslope by gravity assisted by water. Often includes angular rock fragments and boulders.

Appendix B

Drawing

Appendix C

Site History Information

Historical Aerial Photographs PROJECT: 73466.01

Proposed Parkes Hospital PLATE No: 1

Newell Highway, Parkes REV: 0

CLIENT: Health Infrastructure DATE: 21-Oct-13

Photo 1 - 1955

Photo 2 - 1965





Photo 3 - 1973

Photo 4 - 1980





Photo 5 - 1983

Photo 6 - 1989





Photo 7 - 1993

Photo 8 - 2000





Photo 9 - 2004

Photo 10 - 2013

Service First Registration Pty Ltd ACN: 108 037 029 Suite 102, Level 1, 64 Castlereagh Street Ph: 02 9233 1314 Sydney 2000 Fax: 9233 2878 PO Box 1539 Sydney 2000 DX 189 Sydney

Email: [email protected] 1

Summary of Owners Report

LPI Sydney

Address: - Newell Highway, Parkes

Description: - Lot 550 D.P. 750179

The early title to this land was Crown Land We are aware of the following events: - Date of Acquisition and term held

Registered Proprietor(s) & Occupations where available Reference to Title at Acquisition and sale

14.07.1885 Within Parkes Population Area – Revoked 31.07.193101.04.1914 Within Crown Lease Area No 1179 – Revoked 25.07.1952

1922 Andrew Stewart (Auctioneer) Crown Tenure Conditional PurchaseCP 1922/20 – forfeited 22.04.1949

19.08.1949 Within Reserve 2423 from occupation under any MR or BL –revoked 31.01.1953

1949 Application by David John Langlands for Special Lease 1949/25 - withdrawn 1949

25.07.1952 Dedicated as Parkes State Forest – revoked 07.06.1960

21.04.1961 Dedicated for Community Forest Purposes – part revoked 30.08.1974

30.08.1974 Reserve R 87277 for Boy Scouts – being that part marked (A) on the attached cadastre, subsequently revoked 07.11.2003

2007 Possible Licence to Parkes Shire Council (No. 403569)

11.05.2013 Computer Title created showing the State of New South Wales as the Registered Proprietor

# Denotes current registered proprietor Leases and Easements: - NIL Yours Sincerely Mark Groll 14 May 2013 (Ph: 0412 199 304)

Not

e: D

epth

s re

fer t

o st

andi

ng w

ater

leve

ls n

oted

on

licen

ce CLI

EN

T:H

ealth

Infra

stru

ctur

eLi

cenc

ed G

roun

dwat

er B

ores

PR

OJE

CT

No:

7346

6

OFF

ICE

:S

ydne

ySo

uthe

rn P

ortio

nD

WG

No:

GW

-S

DA

TE:

23 M

ay 2

013

Park

esR

EV

ISIO

N:

0

N

5m

20m

13m

51m

22m

Appendix D

Sampling and Analysis Quality Plan

Douglas Partners Pty Ltd ABN 75 053 980 117

www.douglaspartners.com.au 96 Hermitage Road

West Ryde NSW 2114 PO Box 472

West Ryde NSW 1685 Phone (02) 9809 0666

Fax (02) 9809 4095

Brisbane • Cairns • Campbelltown • Canberra • Darwin • Gold Coast • Melbourne • Newcastle • Perth • Sunshine Coast • Sydney • Townsville • Wollongong • Wyong

Project 73466.01Health Infrastructure 14 August 2013c/- TSA Management Pty Ltd PMOLevel 16, 207 Kent Street SYDNEY NSW 2000

Attention: Ms Emma Jowsey

Dear Sirs

Sampling and Analysis Quality Plan Proposed Parkes Hospital Newell Highway, Parkes

1. Introduction

This Sampling and Analysis Quality Plan (SAQP) has been prepared for a proposed detailed contamination assessment on the site of the proposed new Parkes Hospital, Newell Highway, Parkes. The assessment was commissioned by Health Infrastructure, in consultation with TSA Management Pty Ltd, project managers.

The project involves the construction of a new hospital to service the Parkes district. Health Infrastructure has chosen the site from a shortlist of four potential sites. Detailed contamination assessment is required to confirm that the new site is suitable for the construction of a new hospital and to delineate any areas which may require remediation prior to or during the development works.

The scope of the detailed contamination investigation has been prepared with reference to the newly adopted National Environment Protection Measure (NEPM) guidelines where possible. However, it is noted that the scope of the investigation was largely prepared prior to the formal adoption of the NEPM guidelines and Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme (NSWDECC, 2006) has also been used where relevant. This is approach is understood to be acceptable to the NSW EPA as both these guidelines remain current and legal under the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997.

2. Previous Investigations

Douglas Partners undertook a Preliminary Geotechnical and Phase 1 Contamination Assessment on each of the four shortlisted hospital sites in May 2013 (Project 73466). The purpose of the preliminary assessments was to aid in the selection of the preferred site from the four shortlisted sites.

of 8

Sampling and Analysis Quality Plan Project 73466.01Newell Highway, Parkes August 2013

The preliminary assessment on the selected site involved a site inspection by a Senior Engineer and a review of available documentation including published geological and soil landscape maps, historical aerial photographs, historical land title information, notices issued under the Contaminated Lands Management Act 1997, and groundwater bore licences.

The preliminary assessment concluded that the site appears to have primarily been used for agricultural-type purposes. There are currently no agricultural sheds on the site and therefore the risks associated with the storage of pesticides, herbicides and fuel is considered to be low. The site was covered with vegetation at the time of the inspection and therefore the risks associated with excessive concentrations of pesticides and herbicides in the near-surface soils are also considered to be low.

The surrounding sites are primarily used for farming, grazing and/or residential purposes and the risks associated with contamination from adjacent sites are considered to be low. The inferred depth of groundwater (probably >20 m depth) suggests that the quality of the groundwater should be somewhat irrelevant for the proposed development.

On this basis, no major contamination issues that would preclude development on this site were identified from the preliminary assessment.

3. Purpose of Detailed Contamination Assessment

A Detailed Contamination Assessment was commissioned by Health Infrastructure to aid in the management of contamination risks associated with purchasing an 11.8 ha site. Although the preliminary, qualitative assessment indicated a low risk of major contamination on the site, quantitative assessment was commissioned to confirm this risk rating.

The proposed investigation components of the detailed assessment are described in the following sections.

4. Summary of Conceptual Site Model

The preliminary assessment indicated that the risk of site contamination is low. The Conceptual Site Model (CSM) is therefore relatively simple on the basis of the information currently available. Potential soil contamination may be present as a result of:

Placement of soil stockpiles or other filling on the site, the origin of which is unknown;

Previously contaminating activities such as pesticide use, temporary fuel storage for farm machinery etc. which may have occurred in the past. It is noted that there is currently no evidence of such activities having occurred; and

Naturally occurring metals in the soils and rock underlying the site.

of 8


The potential for groundwater contamination will depend on the depth to groundwater. Agriculture is the primary land use up-slope of the site and therefore if groundwater flow follows the natural topography of the site, chemical use on up-gradient sites may have had an impact on groundwater quality.

Soil vapour intrusion is currently considered to be a very low risk on the site and will only be considered if volatile contaminants are encountered during the assessment.

The human receptors to soil and groundwater contamination are likely to be the hospital staff, hospital patients and hospital visitors. Construction personnel and nearby residents may also be receptors during the construction phase of the project.

The ecological receptors are likely to be limited to the flora and fauna that grow/live on the site and visit the site. The area is not known to be ecologically significant.

Exposure pathways are expected to be limited to dermal contact with soils on the site by humans, ingestion of soils and vegetation by fauna, and phytotoxic exposure to flora.

5. Data Quality Objectives

This SAQP has been devised in general accordance with the seven-step data quality objective (DQO) process outlined in Australian Standard AS 4482.1 – 2005 Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil – Part 1: Non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds. The DQO process is outlined below.

(a) State The Problem

The site is to be redeveloped as the new Parkes District Hospital. Detailed Contamination Assessment is required to assess the risk associated with redeveloping the site so that appropriate allowances and remediation measures can be provided as part of the works, if necessary.

(b) Identify the Decision

The preliminary assessment identified a partially demolished brick building and several small stockpiles of soil on the site. No other obvious areas of potential concern were identified and therefore a systematic grid sampling pattern, incorporating sampling of the various stockpiles, was determined to be the most suitable approach for sampling on the site.

The total site area is approximately 11.8 ha. This consists of 9.8 ha of Lot 550 in DP 750179, and approximately 2 ha of the western portion of Lot 7313 in DP 1147330 immediately to the north of the larger lot. A sampling frequency of 11 sampling points per hectare is considered appropriate based on Table A of Contaminated Sites: Sampling Design Guidelines (NSW EPA, 1995). This frequency should be able to detect a contamination hot spot of 35.6 m diameter with 95% confidence.

of 8


A minimum of 130 sampling locations are therefore required on the site.

Further information on the proposed sampling locations and suite of potential contaminants to be analysed are included in Sections 6 to 8 of this SAQP.

(c) Identify Inputs to the Decision

The primary inputs in assessing the presence of contamination on the site will be:

The results of the preliminary contamination assessment;

Field observations;

Laboratory test results; and

Published guidelines appropriate for the proposed hospital land use (commercial/industrial).

(d) Define the Boundary of the Assessment

The boundary of the assessment is defined by the boundary of the subject site as shown in Drawing SK01 attached to this SAQP. The site is identified as Lot 550 in DP 750179, and approximately 2 ha of the western portion of Lot 7313 in DP 1147330 immediately to the north of the larger lot. The site is in the Parish of Parkes, County of Ashburnham

(e) Develop a Decision Rule

The decision rule is based on the following documents:

NSW EPA (1995); Contaminated Sites: Sampling Design Guidelines; and

NEPC (2013), National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure, Schedule B1 – Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater. The site is assumed to be a commercial/industrial site for the health-based components of the assessment. The site categories for the ecological-based components will be determined during the assessment (i.e. determined from soil types, pH and cation exchange capacities of the soils encountered).

(f) Specify Acceptable Limits on Decision Errors

Appropriate quality assurance and quality control measures will be incorporated into the sampling and testing regime to ensure the quality of the assessment data. These measures are outlined in Section 9 of this SAQP.

(g) Optimise the Design for Obtaining Data

The soil sampling locations have been selected using a systematic grid as described above. Groundwater wells will be installed in the deeper geotechnical bores if groundwater is encountered within the assessment depth. In the event that groundwater is beyond the depth of assessment, wells

of 8


will not be installed as the groundwater quality in an aquifer that will not be encountered during development works and will not be used for water supply is considered irrelevant from a land-use perspective.

The procedures for collecting samples will be in general accordance with NEPM, EPA guidelines and/or industry best-practice. Only laboratories accredited by the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) will be used to analyse samples.

6. Proposed Sampling Locations

The area of the development site is understood to be 11.8 ha. A minimum of about 130 sampling points is required for site characterisation of this area in accordance with NSW EPA guidelines. The total number of sampling locations will be at least 130. Stockpiles will be sampled in addition to this suggested frequency. The proposed sampling points are shown in Drawing SK01.

7. Proposed Sampling Methodology

Soil samples will be collected at regular depth intervals until natural soils are encountered. Environmental sampling will be performed in general accordance with the standard procedures outlined in the Douglas Partners Field Procedures Manual. All sampling data will be recorded on chain of custody information sheets. The soil sampling programme will generally include:

Soil sampling using disposable equipment and/or equipment that has been decontaminated using a phosphate-free detergent;

Placement of soil samples into laboratory prepared jars and immediate capping;

Labelling of soil sample jars/bags with individual and unique markings including project number, sample location, sample depth and date of sampling; and

Storage of soil sample jars in a cooled, insulated and sealed container for transport to the laboratory.

If required, the groundwater sampling programme will generally include:

Water sampling using equipment that has been decontaminated using a phosphate-free detergent;

Placement of water samples into laboratory prepared bottles with appropriate preservatives (where required) and immediate capping;

Labelling of water sample bottles with individual and unique markings including project number, sample location and date of sampling; and

of 8


Storage of water sample bottles in a cooled, insulated and sealed container for transport to the laboratory.

In addition, a laboratory prepared blank sample and spiked sample (both soil and water) will be collected and carried throughout the field work to provide an indication of the potential loss of volatile hydrocarbons and to assess the adequacy of the sample handling and storage methods adopted for the assessment. Rinsate samples will also be collected by rinsing decontaminated soil and water sampling equipment with demineralised water to assess the effectiveness of the decontamination process.

8. Proposed Laboratory Testing Programme

Selected soil samples collected during the field work will be sent to NATA accredited analytical laboratories and analysed for the following potential contaminants:

Priority heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni and Zn);

Total recoverable hydrocarbons (TRH);

Monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (BTEX);

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH);

Organochlorine pesticides (OCP);

Organophosphorus pesticides (OPP);

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB);

Phenols;

Asbestos (filling only);

pH; and

Cation exchange capacity (CEC).

The number of samples tested will depend on the subsurface conditions encountered during the field work. It is envisaged that, on average, one soil samples from each sampling location will be tested. The water samples (if collected) will also be tested for the contaminants listed above (excluding asbestos), plus volatile organic compounds (VOC) and iron.

of 8


9. Quality Assurance Plan

9.1 Quality assurance & quality control in the field

Douglas Partners’ quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) procedures will be adopted throughout the field sampling programme to ensure sampling precision and accuracy and to prevent cross-contamination. We will check sampling accuracy and precision through the analysis of triplicate samples in the primary analytical laboratory and a secondary analytical laboratory. The potential for cross-contamination and loss of volatile compounds will be assessed using trip blank and trip spike samples.

Appropriate sampling procedures will be undertaken to ensure that cross-contamination does not occur as outlined in the Douglas Partners Field Procedures Manual. This specifies that:

Standard operating procedures are to be followed;

Site safety plans are to be developed prior to commencing the works;

Triplicate field samples are to be collected and analysed;

Samples are to be stored under secure, temperature-controlled conditions;

Chain of custody documentation is to be employed for the handling, transport and delivery of samples to the selected laboratory; and

Contaminated filling, soil and groundwater originating from the site is to be disposed of in accordance with relevant regulatory guidelines.

9.2 Quality assurance & quality control in the laboratory

The analytical laboratories used during the assessment will conduct in-house QA/QC procedures including:

Analysis of reagent blanks;

Spike recovery analysis;

Laboratory duplicate analysis;

Analysis of control standards;

Analysis of calibration standards and blanks; and

Statistical analysis of QC data.

of 8


9.3 Data quality indicators

The following data quality indicators (DQIs) will need to be achieved during the analysis of QA/QC samples:

Conformance with specified holding times;

Accuracy of spiked samples to be in the range of 70% to 130%;

Field triplicate samples to be collected at a frequency of at least 10% of all samples; and

Field and laboratory duplicate samples to have a precision average within a 30% relative percent difference (RPD) unless circumstances allow a greater range.

Please contact the undersigned if further information is required.

Yours faithfully, Douglas Partners Pty Ltd

Peter Oitmaa Senior Associate

Attachment: Drawing SK01

CLI

EN

T:H

ealth

Infra

stru

ctur

ePr

opos

ed T

est L

ocat

ions

PR

OJE

CT

No:

7346

6.01

OFF

ICE

:S

ydne

yPr

opos

ed H

ospi

tal

DW

G N

o:S

K01

DA

TE:

14 A

ug 2

013

Park

esR

EV

ISIO

N:

2

N

Geotechn

icalBo

res

Pavemen

tBores

Contam

inationBo

res

Appendix E

Field Work Results

0.2

1.0

CLAYEY SILT - stiff red-brown clayey silt topsoil withsome rootlets, humid

CLAYEY SILT - stiff, red-brown clayey silt with some fineironstone gravel, humid

Bore discontinued at 1.0m

Type

327

326

325

324

323

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments

Sampling & In Situ Testing

1

2

3

4

BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE LOG CLIENT:PROJECT:LOCATION: Newell Highway, Parkes

SAMPLING & IN SITU TESTING LEGENDA Auger sample G Gas sample PID Photo ionisation detector (ppm)B Bulk sample P Piston sample PL(A) Point load axial test Is(50) (MPa)BLK Block sample Ux Tube sample (x mm dia.) PL(D) Point load diametral test Is(50) (MPa)C Core drilling W Water sample pp Pocket penetrometer (kPa)D Disturbed sample Water seep S Standard penetration testE Environmental sample Water level V Shear vane (kPa)

BORE No: PC1PROJECT No: 73466.01DATE: 14/8/2013SHEET 1 OF 1

DRILLER: KA LOGGED: AG CASING: -

Health InfrastructureProposed Parkes Hospital

REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat

WATER OBSERVATIONS:TYPE OF BORING:

No free groundwater observed whilst augeringSolid flight auger to 1.0m

SURFACE LEVEL: 327.3 AHDEASTING: 609005NORTHING: 6331216DIP/AZIMUTH: 90°/--

WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.1

1.0

CLAYEY SILT - stiff red-brown clayey silt topsoil withsome rootlets, humidCLAYEY SILT - stiff red-brown clayey silt with some fineironstone gravel, humid


Type

328

327

326

325

324

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.1

1.0

CLAYEY SILT - stiff red-brown clayey silt topsoil withsome rootlets, humidCLAYEY SILT - stiff, red-brown clayey silt with some fineironstone gravel, humid

- very stiff below 0.7m


Type

328

327

326

325

324

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0

CLAYEY SILT - stiff red-brown clayey silt topsoil withsome rootlets, humid- galvanized pipe at 0.1m




Type

329

328

327

326

325

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.2

1.0

CLAYEY SILT - stiff red-brown clayey silt topsoil withsome rootlets, humid


- below 0.7m: very stiff and slightly gravelly (ironstone)


Type

329

328

327

326

325

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat



*TS2A, TS2B are triplicate samples of E 0.1-0.2m


WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

*E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp (with some rootlets in top100mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp- root at 0.3m



Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.0

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, humid (with some rootlets in top100mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp



Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.6

0.7

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, humid (with some rootlets in top100mm)




Type

331

330

329

328

327

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0


GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp


Type

332

331

330

329

328

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp (gravel up to 40mm diameter)

- orange brown below 0.7m


Type

333

332

331

330

329

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff red-brown gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp (with some rootlets in top 100mm)(gravel up to 40mm diameter)

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, orange-brown slightlygravelly (ironstone) clay, damp


Type

334

333

332

331

330

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E*

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

1.0


GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, gravelly (ironstone) clay,damp

- moist below 0.6m


Type

335

334

333

332

331

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.6

0.7

0.2

0.8

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff brown gravelly (ironstone)clay, damp (with some rootlets in top 100mm)

CLAYEY GRAVEL- very stiff and hard, clayey gravel(ironstone), damp

- moist below 0.5m

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, gravelly (ironstone) clay,damp


Type

336

335

334

333

332

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.9

1.0

0.2

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, brown, gravelly (ironstone) clay,damp (with some rootlets in top 100mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, slightly gravelly (ironstone)clay, damp



Type

337

336

335

334

333

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown, silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel and rootlets, damp

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp

- moist below 0.4m

- orange-brown and damp below 0.8m


Type

336

335

334

333

332

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.6

0.7

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY- stiff, brown, silty clay with some fineironstone gravel, damp (with some rootlets in top 100mm)


- moist below 0.4m

- orange-brown and damp below 0.7m


Type

335

334

333

332

331

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

0.5

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown, silty clay with some rootlets,damp

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay, damp

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown, gravelly clay,damp- moist below 0.6m


Type

334

333

332

331

330

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.3

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, damp (with rootlets in top 200mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, silty clay with somemedium irosntone gravel, damp



Type

333

332

331

330

329

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat



*TS9A, TS9B are triplicate of 0.0-0.1m


WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

*E

E

0.1

0.2

0.6

0.7

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with a trace of fineironstone gravel, damp (with rootlets in top 100mm)


- very stiff below 0.5


Type

332

331

330

329

328

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.6

0.7

0.4

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay, damp (with rootlets intop 200mm)




Type

331

330

329

328

327

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

0.7

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp (with rootlets in top100mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, humid



Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.2

1.0

CLAYEY SILT - stiff brown clayey silt, damp (with somerootlets in top 100mm)

CLAYEY SILT - stiff, red-brown clayey silt with some fineironstone gravel, damp

- slightly gravelly (ironstone) below 0.7m


Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay, damp (with somerootlets in top 100mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with a trace of fineironstone gravel


Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff brown silty clay, damp (with somerootlets in top 200mm)



Type

329

328

327

326

325

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0


SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with a trace of fineto medium ironstone gravel, damp


Type

328

327

326

325

324

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.2

0.3

0.5

0.6

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some fineironstone gravel, humid (with some rootlets in top 50mm)



Type

328

327

326

325

324

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff red-brown silty clay with some fineironstone gravel, humid (with some rootlets in top 50mm)



Type

328

327

326

325

324

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0


SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with a trace offine ironstone gravel, damp


Type

329

328

327

326

325

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.6

0.7

0.4

1.0




Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat



*TS3A, TS3B are triplicate of E 0.8-0.9m


WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

*E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.4

1.0


SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with a trace of fineironstone gravel, damp


Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.2

0.3

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.4

1.0



- slightly gravelly (ironstone) below 0.8m


Type

331

330

329

328

327

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.2

0.3

0.6

0.7

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with a trace of fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp (with rootlets in top200mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with a trace of fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp



Type

332

331

330

329

328

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with a trace of fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp (with rootlets in top100mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, slightly gravelly (ironstone)silty clay, damp


Type

332

331

330

329

328

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

*E

E

0.00.1

0.6

0.7

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp (with rootlets in top200mm)



Type

333

332

331

330

329

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, humid (with rootlets in top 200mm)

- damp below 0.3m

- very stiff and slightly gravelly (ironstone) below 0.5m

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, orange-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp


Type

334

333

332

331

330

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

1.0




Type

335

334

333

332

331

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

0.8

1.0


SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, damp


GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, orange-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, humid


Type

336

335

334

333

332

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

1.0



- orange-brown and humid below 0.7m


Type

337

336

335

334

333

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

1.3

1.5

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown gravelly (ironstone)clay, damp (with rootlets in top 200mm)


- firm to stiff 1.0-1.3m

ANDESITE - extremely low and very low strength, brownand grey porphyritic andesite

Bore discontinued at 1.5mTy

pe

339

338

337

336

335

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat



Bore deepened to investigate lower strength material from 1.0-1.3m


WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp (with rootlets in top 200mm)



- humid below 0.7m


Type

339

338

337

336

335

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, brown, gravelly (ironstone) siltyclay, humid (with rootlets in top 200mm)

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, gravelly (ironstone)clay, damp- very stiff below 0.4m


Type

338

337

336

335

334

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, brown, gravelly (ironstone) siltyclay with some rootlets, humid

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, gravelly (ironstone)clay, damp



Type

337

336

335

334

333

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, gravelly (ironstone)silty clay with some rootlets, humid (with rootlets in top200mm)




Type

336

335

334

333

332

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

*E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, gravelly (ironstone)silty clay with some rootlets, humid- root at 0.1m




Type

336

335

334

333

332

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

0.2

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, gravelly (ironstone)silty clay with some rootlets, humid

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown, gravelly siltyclay, humid

- hard below 0.7m


Type

335

334

333

332

331

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp (with rootlets in top 200mm)

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, slightly gravelly(ironstone) silty clay, damp


- orange-brown below 0.7m


Type

334

333

332

331

330

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, damp (with some rootlets)

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp (gravel up to 40mm diameter)


Type

333

332

331

330

329

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

*E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

0.8

1.0



GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, orange brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp


Type

332

331

330

329

328

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.4

1.0




Type

331

330

329

328

327

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

1.0




Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff brown silty clay, damp



Type

329

328

327

326

325

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

0.8

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff brown silty clay with a trace ofironstone gravel, humid (with some rootlets in top 100mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, humid

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff orange-brown gravelly(ironstone) clay, humid


Type

328

327

326

325

324

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

*E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay, humid (with somerootlets in top 100mm)

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown gravelly(ironstone) clay, humid


Type

329

328

327

326

325

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.2

1.0




Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red- brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp




Type

331

330

329

328

327

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1E 0.0

0.1

0.2

0.7

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp (with some rootlets in top100mm)


SILTY CLAY - stiff and very stiff, orange-brown silty claywith some fine to medium ironstone gravel, damp


Type

332

331

330

329

328

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

1.0





Type

333

332

331

330

329

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0


GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, slightly gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp



Type

333

332

331

330

329

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

*E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, damp (with some rootlets in top 200mm)

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, slightly gravelly(ironstone) gravel, damp


Type

334

333

332

331

330

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

0.7

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown, silty clay, damp ( with somerootlets in top 200mm)




Type

335

334

333

332

331

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.4

0.5

0.8

0.9

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel and rootlets, humid




Type

336

335

334

333

332

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

*E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay, humid (with somerootlets in top 200mm)



- humid below 0.7m


Type

337

336

335

334

333

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

0.7

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay, humid (with somerootlets in top 200mm)

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, gravelly (ironstone)clay, damp (ironstone gravel up to 40mm diameter)




Type

338

337

336

335

334

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

1.0






Type

339

338

337

336

335

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, gravelly (ironstone)clay, damp (with some rootlets in top 200mm)



Type

341

340

339

338

337

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown, gravelly (gravelup to 40mm diameter), humid (with some rootlets in top100mm)- damp below 0.2m


Type

343

342

341

340

339

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown, gravelly (gravelup to 40mm diameter) clay, humid (with some rootlets intop 100mm)- damp below 0.2m


Type

342

341

340

339

338

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

1.0



Type

343

342

341

340

339

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, damp (with rootlets in top 100mm)




Type

342

341

340

339

338

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel and rootlets, damp





Type

340

339

338

337

336

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

*E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.7

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, gravelly (ironstone)silty clay, humid (with rootlets in top 100mm)

- root at 0.2m


GRAVELLY CLAY - hard, silty clayey gravel (ironstone),humid


Type

340

339

338

337

336

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown slightly gravelly (ironstone)silty clay, humid (with some rootlets in top 100mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, slightly gravelly (ironstone)clay, damp



Type

338

337

336

335

334

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

0.7

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, damp

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown slightly gravelly (ironstone)clay, damp




Type

337

336

335

334

333

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

1.0






Type

336

335

334

333

332

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, damp (with some rootlets in top 200mm)




Type

334

333

332

331

330

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0


SILTY CLAY - stiff, orange-brown silty clay with some fineto medium ironstone gravel, damp



Type

333

332

331

330

329

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.6

0.7

0.3

0.8

1.0


SILTY CLAY - stiff, red- brown silty clay with some fineironstone gravel, damp

SILTY CLAY - very stiff, orange-brown silty clay with somefine to medium ironstone gravel, damp


Type

332

331

330

329

328

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.2

1.0




Type

331

330

329

328

327

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0


SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp- very stiff below 0.7m


Type

331

330

329

328

327

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat



*TS5A, TS5B are triplicate sample of E 0.0-0.1m


WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

*E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0





Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some fineironstone gravel, humid

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, orange- brown gravelly clayhumid



Type

329

328

327

326

325

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gavel and rootlets, damp

SILTY CLAY - stiff, orange- brown, silty clay with somefine to medium ironstone gravel androots, damp

- slightly gravelly (ironstone) below 0.6m- very stiff below 0.7m


Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some burnt roots,damp (with some rootlets in top 100mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some burntroots, damp



Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0





Type

331

330

329

328

327

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.6

0.7

0.2

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, brown gravelly (ironstone) clay,damp (with some rootlets in top 200mm)



Type

332

331

330

329

328

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

*E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown gravelly (ironstone)clay, humid (with some rootlets in top 200mm)


- hard below 0.7m


Type

333

332

331

330

329

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp




Type

334

333

332

331

330

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.6

0.7

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, humid (with some rootlets in top 200mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, orange-brown silty clay with a trace ofmedium ironstone gravel, damp



Type

335

334

333

332

331

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

*E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

0.70.75

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, humid (with some rootlets in top 200mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, orange-brown silty clay with somemedium ironstone gravel, damp

ANDESITE - medium and high strength, dark grey andbrown, porphyritic andesiteBore discontinued at 0.75m

Type

335

334

333

332

331

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.70.75

0.3

0.8

1.0

CLAYEY SILT - stiff, red-brown clayey silt with somemedium ironstone gravel, humid (with some rootlets in top200mm)



ANDESITE - extremely low and very low strength, brownand grey, porphyritic andesite


Type

337

336

335

334

333

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.9

1.0

0.2

0.7

1.0

CLAYEY SILT - stiff, red-brown, clayey silt with somemedium ironstone gravel, humid (with some rootlets)



ANDESITE - extremely low and very low strength, brownand dark grey, porphyritic andesite


Type

338

337

336

335

334

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

0.7

1.0




ANDESITE - extremely low and very low strength, brownand dark grey, porphyritic andesite


Type

341

340

339

338

337

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, gravelly (ironstone)silty clay, humid (with some rootlets in top 200mm)

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, gravelly (ironstone)gravel, damp



Type

343

342

341

340

339

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.7

1.0



ANDESITE - extremely low and very low strength, greybrown and dark grey, porphyritic andesite


Type

344

343

342

341

340

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, gravelly (ironstone)clay with some rootlets in top 200mm, humid

- damp below 0.2m



Type

346

345

344

343

342

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown, gravelly(ironstone) silty clay, humid (with some rootlets in top100mm)

- damp below 0.7m


Type

346

345

344

343

342

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, humid (with some rootlets in top 100mm)

- damp below 0.2m


Type

348

347

346

345

344

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

*E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0





Type

327

326

325

324

323

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, humid (with some rootlets in top 100mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with a trace ofmedium ironstone gravel, damp


Type

328

327

326

325

324

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

*E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

0.8

1.0


SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with someironstone gravel, damp


CLAYEY GRAVEL - hard, red-brown clayey gravel(ironstone), humid


Type

329

328

327

326

325

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

1.0




Type

329

328

327

326

325

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

*E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some rootlets,damp




Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp (with some rootlets in top200mm)




Type

331

330

329

328

327

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

*E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0





Type

332

331

330

329

328

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

0.6

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, rootlets and roots, damp


GRAVELLY CLAY - hard, orange-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, humid (possibly weathered rock)


Type

333

332

331

330

329

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.4

0.5

0.8

0.9

0.2

0.6

1.0

CLAYEY GRAVEL - dense, brown, clayey gravel(ironstone), moist (with some rootlets in top 100mm)

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, orange-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff and hard, orange-brown,gravelly (ironstone) clay, humid (possibly weathered rock)


Type

333

332

331

330

329

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.2

0.7

1.0



GRAVELLY CLAY - hard, orange-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, humid (possibly weathered rock)


Type

334

333

332

331

330

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.2

0.7

1.0

CLAYEY GRAVEL - very stiff, brown clayey gravel(ironstone) damp


GRAVELLY CLAY - hard, orange-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, humid


Type

334

333

332

331

330

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, orange-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, humid (with some rootlets in top 100mm)

- damp below 0.2m


Type

334

333

332

331

330

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1E0.5

0.6

0.2

0.7

1.0






Type

333

332

331

330

329

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

0.7

1.0


CLAYEY GRAVEL - dense red-brown clayey gravel(ironstone), moist

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, orange-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp (possibly weathered rock)


Type

332

331

330

329

328

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

*E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.7

1.0


- moist below 0.3m


GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, orange-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, humid (possibly weathered rock)


Type

332

331

330

329

328

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.7

1.0


- very stiff below 0.4m- moist below 0.5m

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, orange-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, humid (possibly weathered rock)


Type

331

330

329

328

327

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

0.7

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp (with some rootlets in top 100mm)

CLAYEY GRAVEL - very stiff, clayey gravel (ironstone)damp

CLAYEY GRAVEL - hard, orange-brown clayey gravel(ironstone), humid (possibly weathered rock)


Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.2

0.8

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp (with rootlets in top100mm)

GRAVELLY CLAY - stiff, red-brown, gravelly (ironstone)clay, damp- moist below 0.4m


GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, orange-brown, gravelly(ironstone) clay, damp (possibly weathered rock)


Type

329

328

327

326

325

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.8

0.9

0.3

1.0





Type

328

327

326

325

324

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0




- firm to stiff and moist below 0.8m


Type

328

327

326

325

324

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0


SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel and burn roots (charcoal), damp



Type

327

326

325

324

323

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.1

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0


SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with a trace ofmedium ironstone gravel, damp



Type

326

325

324

323

322

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

E

0.00.1

0.5

0.6

0.2

1.0




Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4



BORE No: PP1PROJECT No: 73466.01DATE: 14/8/2013SHEET 1 OF 1



REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

B

E

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.6

0.7

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay, damp (with somerootlets, in top 200mm)


- very stiff and slightly gravely below 0.7m


Type

331

330

329

328

327

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

B

E

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with a trace of fine tomedium ironstone gravel, damp (with some rootlets in top200mm)




Type

329

328

327

326

325

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

BE

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.3

1.0




Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

Details

PID<1

PID<1

E

B

E

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.5

0.6

1.0

GRAVELLY CLAY - very stiff, red-brown gravelly(ironstone) silty clay, humid (with some rootlets in top100mm)

- hard below 0.4m


Type

330

329

328

327

326

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

*E

BE

0.00.1

0.3

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, humid (with some rootlets in top 200mm)




Type

327

326

325

324

323

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

B

E

0.00.1

0.3

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0





Type

328

327

326

325

324

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat





WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

*E

B

E

0.00.1

0.3

0.5

0.6

0.3

1.0

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay with some mediumironstone gravel, damp (with some rootlets, in top 200mm)




Type

328

327

326

325

324

Depth(m)

1

2

3

4

RL

Wat

er

Dep

th

Sam

ple

Descriptionof

Strata Gra

phic

Log

Results &Comments


1

2

3

4






REMARKS:

RIG: Bobcat




WellConstruction

DetailsPID<1

PID<1

E

B

E

0.00.1

0.3

0.5

0.6

2.8m: J80°, pl, ro, fe,2mm3m: CORE LOSS:400mm

3.45m: J80°, pl, ro, fe,2mm3.75m: J70°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

4.3-4.4m: J(x3)30°, pl,fe, 1mm4.6-5.0m: J(x7)20-30°,pl, ro, fe, 1mm

5.1-5.3m: J(x4)30°-40°,pl, ro, fe, 1mm

SILTY CLAY - stiff, dark red-brown,silty clay, damp (with some rootletsin top 100mm)SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown siltyclay with some ironstone gravel,damp- very stiff below 1.0m

ANDESITE - extremely low strength,light brown andesite with lowstrength bands

ANDESITE - extremely low to lowstrength, extremely then moderatelyweathered, fractured and slightlyfractured, orange brown porphyriticandesite

ANDESITE - low strength with verylow and medium strength bands,moderately weathered, fractured andslightly fractured, orange brownporphyritic andesite


7,7,8N = 15

PL(A) = 0.6

PL(A) = 0.5

PL(A) = 0.6

0

33

71

100

A/E

A/E

A

S

A

C

C

0.4

1.5

2.5

3.0

3.4

6.0

FractureSpacing

(m)

0.01

Depth(m) B - Bedding

S - Shear

RockStrength

Type


Ex

Low

Ver

y Lo

wLo

wM

ediu

mH

igh

Ver

y H

igh

Ex

Hig

h

0.10

0.50

1.00 R

QD

%Cor

eR

ec. %

Gra

phic

Log

Wat

er

Degree ofWeathering

EW

HW

MW

SW

FS FR

Descriptionof

Strata

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

J - JointF - Fault

RL

328

327

326

325

324

323

322

321

320

319

Test Results&

Comments0.05

Discontinuities



BORE No: PG1PROJECT No: 73466.01DATE: 12/8/2013SHEET 1 OF 1

DRILLER: RE&KE LOGGED: PGH/AG CASING: HW to 2.5m

Health InfrastructureParkes Hospital Redevelopment

REMARKS:

RIG: Scout 4


No free groundwater observed whilst augeringSolid flight auger (TC bit) to 2.5m; NMLC coring to 6.0m


2.5m: CORE LOSS:100mm

5.15m: He 10mm5.21m: He 5-10mm

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown siltyclay, damp (with some rootlets in top50mm)SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown siltyclay with some fine ironstone gravel- very stiff below 1.0m


ANDESITE - extremely low to verylow strength, extremely and highlyweathered, brown and pale greenporphyritic andesite

ANDESITE - very low strength,moderately weathered, pale greenporphyritic andesiteBore discontinued at 5.35m

4,5,7N = 12

PL(A) = 0.2

096

A/E

S

C

0.4

2.0

2.52.6

4.86

5.35

FractureSpacing

(m)

0.01


S - Shear

RockStrength

Type


Ex

Low

Ver

y Lo

wLo

wM

ediu

mH

igh

Ver

y H

igh

Ex

Hig

h

0.10

0.50

1.00 R

QD

%Cor

eR

ec. %

Gra

phic

Log

Wat

er

Degree ofWeathering

EW

HW

MW

SW

FS FR

Descriptionof

Strata

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

J - JointF - Fault

RL

330

329

328

327

326

325

324

323

322

321

Test Results&

Comments0.05

Discontinuities




DRILLER: RE&KE LOGGED: PGH CASING: HW to 2.5m


REMARKS:

RIG: Scout 4




2.85m: He, 10mm

3.13m: Cz(?), 100mm

3.35m: J80°, pl, s, t, cln3.36m: J33°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

4.43m: J20°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

SILTY CLAY- stiff, brown silty clay,damp (with some rootlets in top100mm)SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown siltyclay with some fine ironstone gravel,damp


ANDESITE - extremely low strength,light brown andesite with lowstrength bandsANDESITE - very low and lowstrength, highly then slightlyweathered, slightly fractured, orangebrown porphyritic andesite


5,7,8N = 15

PL(A) = 0.3

PL(A) = 0.2

PL(A) = 0.2

0

80

100

100

A/E

A/E

S

C

C

0.4

2.3

2.5

5.5

FractureSpacing

(m)

0.01


S - Shear

RockStrength

Type


Ex

Low

Ver

y Lo

wLo

wM

ediu

mH

igh

Ver

y H

igh

Ex

Hig

h

0.10

0.50

1.00 R

QD

%Cor

eR

ec. %

Gra

phic

Log

Wat

er

Degree ofWeathering

EW

HW

MW

SW

FS FR

Descriptionof

Strata

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

J - JointF - Fault

RL

331

330

329

328

327

326

325

324

323

322

Test Results&

Comments0.05

Discontinuities




DRILLER: RE&KE LOGGED: AG/PGH CASING: HW to 2.5m


REMARKS:

RIG: Scout 4




2.69m: J29°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

3.14m: J33°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

3.6m: J25°, pl, ro,fe,1mm3.73m: J40°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.94m: J72°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.4m: J75°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.61m: J70°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

5.05m: J10°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay,damp (with some rootlets in top100mm)SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown siltyclay with some fine ironstone gravel,damp- hard below 1.0m

ANDESITE - extremely low strength,light brown andesite with some lowstrength bands

ANDESITE - very low and lowstrength with medium strengthbands, moderately and slightlyweathered, slightly fractured, orangebrown, porphyritic andesite


6,10,18N = 28

PL(A) = 0.5

PL(A) = 0.5

PL(A) = 0.1

PL(A) = 0.1

27100

A/E

*A/E

S

C

0.5

1.2

2.5

5.15

FractureSpacing

(m)

0.01


S - Shear

RockStrength

Type


Ex

Low

Ver

y Lo

wLo

wM

ediu

mH

igh

Ver

y H

igh

Ex

Hig

h

0.10

0.50

1.00 R

QD

%Cor

eR

ec. %

Gra

phic

Log

Wat

er

Degree ofWeathering

EW

HW

MW

SW

FS FR

Descriptionof

Strata

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

J - JointF - Fault

RL

332

331

330

329

328

327

326

325

324

323

Test Results&

Comments0.05

Discontinuities




DRILLER: RE&KE LOGGED: AG CASING: HW to 2.5m


REMARKS:

RIG: Scout 4




2.64m: J35°, pl, ro, fe,1-2mm2.85m: J85°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

3.65m: J85°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.85m: J50°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.1m: J30°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.27m: J45°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.3m: J45°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.46m: J20°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.7m: J50°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.85m: J30°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

SILTY CLAY - stiff brown silty clay,damp (with some rootlets in top100mm)SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown siltyclay with some fine to mediumironstone gravel, dampANDESITE - extremely low strength,light brown andesite with mediumstrength bands

ANDESITE - extremely low and lowstrength, extremely and highlyweathered, slightly fractured, brownand tan porphyritic andesite

ANDESITE - high strength, slightlyweathered, slightly fractured, brownporphyritic andesite


8,16,20N = 36

PL(A) = 1.7

PL(A) = 3

50100

A/E

A/E

S

C

0.3

0.9

2.5

3.75

5.0

FractureSpacing

(m)

0.01


S - Shear

RockStrength

Type


Ex

Low

Ver

y Lo

wLo

wM

ediu

mH

igh

Ver

y H

igh

Ex

Hig

h

0.10

0.50

1.00 R

QD

%Cor

eR

ec. %

Gra

phic

Log

Wat

er

Degree ofWeathering

EW

HW

MW

SW

FS FR

Descriptionof

Strata

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

J - JointF - Fault

RL

333

332

331

330

329

328

327

326

325

324

Test Results&

Comments0.05

Discontinuities






REMARKS:

RIG: Scout 4




3.55m: CORE LOSS:200mm

4.7m: CORE LOSS:200mm5.02m: J45°, pl, ro fe1mm

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay,damp (with some rootlets in top200mm)SILTY CLAY - stiff, red brown siltyclay with some fine to mediumironstone gravel, damp


ANDESITE - very low strength,extremely weathered, slightlyfractured, brown porphyritic andesite(clay)


5,7,7N = 14

PL(A) = 0.09

PL(A) = 0.08

PL(A) = 0.06

0

0

100

79

A/E

A/E

S

C

C

0.4

1.7

2.5

3.75

4.9

5.45

FractureSpacing

(m)

0.01


S - Shear

RockStrength

Type


Ex

Low

Ver

y Lo

wLo

wM

ediu

mH

igh

Ver

y H

igh

Ex

Hig

h

0.10

0.50

1.00 R

QD

%Cor

eR

ec. %

Gra

phic

Log

Wat

er

Degree ofWeathering

EW

HW

MW

SW

FS FR

Descriptionof

Strata

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

J - JointF - Fault

RL

331

330

329

328

327

326

325

324

323

322

Test Results&

Comments0.05

Discontinuities



BORE No: PG6PROJECT No: 73466.01DATE: 13 - 14/8/2013SHEET 1 OF 1



REMARKS:

RIG: Scout 4




3.05m: J55°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.3m: J80°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.45m: J35°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.7-4.00m: J(x7) 80°, pl,ro, fe, 1mm

4.82m: J30°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay,damp (with some rootlets in top200mm)SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown siltyclay with some fine to mediumironstone gravel ,damp- very stiff below 1.0m


ANDESITE - extremely low and verylow strength, extremely tomoderately weathered, slightlyfractured, brown porphyritic andesite

ANDESITE - medium then very lowstrength, slightly weathered, slightlyfractured, light orange brownporphyritic andesite


7,14,14N = 28

PL(A) = 0.1PL(A) = 0.8

PL(A) = 0.4

PL(A) = 0.1

40100

A/E

A/E

S

C

0.4

1.5

2.5

3.75

5.0

FractureSpacing

(m)

0.01


S - Shear

RockStrength

Type


Ex

Low

Ver

y Lo

wLo

wM

ediu

mH

igh

Ver

y H

igh

Ex

Hig

h

0.10

0.50

1.00 R

QD

%Cor

eR

ec. %

Gra

phic

Log

Wat

er

Degree ofWeathering

EW

HW

MW

SW

FS FR

Descriptionof

Strata

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

J - JointF - Fault

RL

332

331

330

329

328

327

326

325

324

323

Test Results&

Comments0.05

Discontinuities






REMARKS:

RIG: Scout 4




2.78m: J70°, pl, ro, fe,1mm2.96m: J55°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.16m: Ds, 20mm3.46m: J50°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.71m: J42°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

4.18m: J45°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

4.6m: J55°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.75m: J(x4) 45°, pl, ro,fe, 1mm

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay,damp (with rootlets in top 200mm)

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown siltyclay with a trace of fine ironstonegravel, damp



ANDESITE - medium strength,slightly weathered, slightly fractured,light brown porphyritic andesite

ANDESITE - high strength, slightlyweathered, fractured then slightlyfractured, light brown porphyriticandesiteBore discontinued at 5.2m

6,8,19N = 27

PL(A) = 1

PL(A) = 0.8

PL(A) = 1PL(A) = 1.5

98

92

100

100

100

100

A/E

A/E

S

C

C

C

0.4

1.4

2.5

4.6

5.2

FractureSpacing

(m)

0.01


S - Shear

RockStrength

Type


Ex

Low

Ver

y Lo

wLo

wM

ediu

mH

igh

Ver

y H

igh

Ex

Hig

h

0.10

0.50

1.00 R

QD

%Cor

eR

ec. %

Gra

phic

Log

Wat

er

Degree ofWeathering

EW

HW

MW

SW

FS FR

Descriptionof

Strata

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

J - JointF - Fault

RL

334

333

332

331

330

329

328

327

326

325

Test Results&

Comments0.05

Discontinuities






REMARKS:

RIG: Scout 4




2.65m: J45°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

3.3m: J70°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.6m: J50°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.75m: J50°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.92m: J55°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.24m: J70°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.47m: J80°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.65m: J45°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown, silty clay,damp (with some rootlets in top200mm)SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown siltyclay with a trace of fine to mediumironstone gravel, damp



ANDESITE - extremely low to lowand very low strength, extremely tomoderately weathered, slightlyfractured, orange brown porphyriticandesite

ANDESITE - low strength, slightlyweathered, slightly fractured, lightorange brown porphyritic andesite


10,14,17N = 31

PL(A) = 0.09

PL(A) = 0.2

60100

A/E

A/E

S

C

0.3

1.3

2.5

4.3

5.0

FractureSpacing

(m)

0.01


S - Shear

RockStrength

Type


Ex

Low

Ver

y Lo

wLo

wM

ediu

mH

igh

Ver

y H

igh

Ex

Hig

h

0.10

0.50

1.00 R

QD

%Cor

eR

ec. %

Gra

phic

Log

Wat

er

Degree ofWeathering

EW

HW

MW

SW

FS FR

Descriptionof

Strata

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

J - JointF - Fault

RL

334

333

332

331

330

329

328

327

326

325

Test Results&

Comments0.05

Discontinuities






REMARKS:

RIG: Scout 4




3.14m: Ds 20mm

3.61m: J35°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.7m: J55°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.85m: J40°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.06m: J30°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.3m: Ds, 15°4.54m: J15°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.83m: J10°, pl, ro, fe,1mm5.24m: cly 15mm5.38m: J80°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty claywith a trace of fine ironstone gravel,damp (with some rootlets in top200mm)SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown siltyclay with some fine to mediumironstone gravel damp- very stiff below 1.0m


ANDESITE - medium strength,moderately then slightly weathered,slightly fractured, brown and lightgreen, porphyritic andesite


7,9,11N = 20

PL(A) = 1

PL(A) = 0.8

PL(A) = 0.7

PL(A) = 0.5

92

93

100

100

A/E

A/E

S

C

C

0.4

1.5

2.5

5.55

FractureSpacing

(m)

0.01


S - Shear

RockStrength

Type


Ex

Low

Ver

y Lo

wLo

wM

ediu

mH

igh

Ver

y H

igh

Ex

Hig

h

0.10

0.50

1.00 R

QD

%Cor

eR

ec. %

Gra

phic

Log

Wat

er

Degree ofWeathering

EW

HW

MW

SW

FS FR

Descriptionof

Strata

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

J - JointF - Fault

RL

331

330

329

328

327

326

325

324

323

322

Test Results&

Comments0.05

Discontinuities




DRILLER: RE&KE LOGGED: PGH/AG CASING: HW to 2.5m


REMARKS:

RIG: Scout 4




3.07m: J45°, pl, ro, fe,2mm3.1m: J(x5) 30°, pl, ro,fe, 1mm

4.2m: J70°, pl, r,o fe,3mm4.44m: J70°, pl, ro, fe,2mm

4.9m: J55°, pl, ro, fe,3mm

SILTY CLAY - brown silty clay

SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown siltyclay with a trace of fine ironstonegravel, damp

ANDESITE - extremely low strength,light brown andesite

ANDESITE - very low to lowstrength, highly weathered withsome extremely low strength bands,slightly fractured, red brown andbrown, porphyritc andesite


PL(A) = 0.1

PL(A) = 0.1

PL(A) = 0.1

PL(A) = 0.1

64100

A/E

A/E

C

0.4

1.6

2.5

5.35

FractureSpacing

(m)

0.01


S - Shear

RockStrength

Type


Ex

Low

Ver

y Lo

wLo

wM

ediu

mH

igh

Ver

y H

igh

Ex

Hig

h

0.10

0.50

1.00 R

QD

%Cor

eR

ec. %

Gra

phic

Log

Wat

er

Degree ofWeathering

EW

HW

MW

SW

FS FR

Descriptionof

Strata

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

J - JointF - Fault

RL

330

329

328

327

326

325

324

323

322

321

Test Results&

Comments0.05

Discontinuities




DRILLER: RE&KE LOGGED: AG/PGH CASING: HW to 2.5m


REMARKS:

RIG: Scout 4




2.5m: CORE LOSS:100mm2.66m: J45°, pl, ro, fe,1mm

3.19m: J30°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.49m: J70°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.6m: J85°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.82m: J55°, pl, ro, fe,1mm3.9m: J30°, pl, ro, fe,1mm4.33m: possible crushedzone 70mm4.8m: possible crushedzone 70mm

SILTY CLAY - stiff, brown silty clay,damp (with some rootlets in top200mm)SILTY CLAY - stiff, red-brown siltyclay with a trace of fine to mediumironstone gravel, damp- very stiff below 1.0m


ANDESITE - low and mediumstrength, extremely to moderatelyweathered, brown and pale greenporphyritic andesite

ANDESITE - low strength,moderately weathered, pale greenporphyritic andesiteBore discontinued at 5.2m

9,9,12N = 21

PL(A) = 0.4

PL(A) = 1

PL(A) = 0.3

72

90

100

100

A/E

A/E

S

C

C

0.4

1.7

2.52.6

4.86

5.2

FractureSpacing

(m)

0.01


S - Shear

RockStrength

Type


Ex

Low

Ver

y Lo

wLo

wM

ediu

mH

igh

Ver

y H

igh

Ex

Hig

h

0.10

0.50

1.00 R

QD

%Cor

eR

ec. %

Gra

phic

Log

Wat

er

Degree ofWeathering

EW

HW

MW

SW

FS FR

Descriptionof

Strata

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

J - JointF - Fault

RL

327

326

325

324

323

322

321

320

319

318

Test Results&

Comments0.05

Discontinuities




DRILLER: RE&KE LOGGED: PGH CASING: HW to 2.5m


REMARKS:

RIG: Scout 4




Appendix F

Summary of Laboratory Test Results

Pag

e F1

of F

7

Det

aile

d S

ite In

vest

igat

ion

(Con

tam

inat

ion)

, Pro

pose

d P

arke

s H

ospi

tal

Pro

ject

734

66.0

1N

ewel

l Hig

hway

, Par

kes

Dec

embe

r 201

3

Tabl

e F1

: C

onta

min

ant C

once

ntra

tions

in S

oils

Sam

ple/

D

epth

(m)

B

T E

X N

apth

. F1

F2

+P

AH

B

.TEQ

O

CP

OPP

PC

B

Phen

ol

Asb

esto

s A

s C

d C

r C

u Pb

H

g N

i Zn

mg/

kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

(Y/N

)m

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kg

Stoc

kpile

d Fi

lling

PS

1<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

4

<0.4

31

23

11

<0

.1

12

36

PS

2<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

5

<0.4

28

32

14

<0

.1

15

130

PS

3<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

5

<0.4

22

22

15

<0

.1

13

45

PS

4<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

5

<0.4

24

21

13

<0

.1

10

33

PS

5A

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

N

4 <0

.4

29

21

15

<0.1

11

34

PS

6<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 0.

05

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

<4

<0

.4

22

16

10

<0.1

8

29

PS

7<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

5

<0.4

29

26

15

0.

1 13

42

PS

8<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

4

<0.4

27

22

14

<0

.1

11

40

PS

9<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

4

<0.4

25

19

17

<0

.1

10

34

PS

10<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 63

10

<2

<0

.8

<3.5

<5

N

17

<0

.4

29

58

53

0.1

17

120

PS11

A

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

N

5 <0

.4

27

20

12

<0.1

10

40

PS

12<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

5

<0.4

24

24

11

0.

1 12

32

PS

13<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

5

<0.4

29

24

13

<0

.1

13

38

PS

14<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

7

<0.4

23

27

16

<0

.1

14

54

PS

15<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

6

<0.4

24

26

12

<0

.1

12

52

Nat

ural

Soi

ls

PC

1/0-

0.1

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

N

7 <0

.4

42

23

17

0.4

13

65

PC

2/0-

0.1

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

7 <0

.4

41

25

22

0.2

15

43

PC

3/0-

0.1

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

47

31

15

0.2

15

28

PC

4/0.

5-0.

6 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

38

31

18

0.

1 19

86

PC

5/0.

1-0.

2 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

39

31

18

<0

.1

17

34

PC

6/0-

0.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

47

28

15

<0.1

13

27

PC

7/0-

0.1

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

43

25

13

<0.1

14

40

PC

8/0.

5-0.

6 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

42

21

12

<0

.1

12

19

PC

9/0.

1-0.

2 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

40

18

11

<0

.1

10

23

PC

10/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

39

14

10

<0.1

9

26

PC

11/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

40

10

9

<0.1

7

10

PC

12/0

.6-0

.7

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

29

11

8 <0

.1

7 9

PC

13/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

N

7 <0

.4

28

5 6

<0.1

4

4

PC

14/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

7

<0.4

42

23

17

0.

4 13

65

Not

es:

B =

Ben

zene

; T =

Tol

uene

; E =

Eth

ylbe

nzen

e; X

= X

ylen

e; N

apth

. = N

apht

hale

ne; F

1 =

(C6 –

C10

) – B

TEX

; F2

= (C

11 –

C16

) – N

apht

hale

ne; +

PA

H =

Pos

itive

pol

ycyc

lic a

rom

atic

hyd

roca

rbon

s; B

.TE

Q =

Car

cino

geni

c P

AH

s (a

s B

(a)P

TE

Q);

OC

P =

Org

anoc

hlor

ine

pest

icid

es;

OP

P =

Org

anop

hosp

horu

s pe

stic

ides

; PC

B =

Pol

ychl

orin

ated

bip

heny

ls; A

s =

Ars

enic

; Cd

= C

adm

ium

; Cr =

Chr

omiu

m; C

u =

Cop

per;

Pb

= Le

ad; H

g =

Mer

cury

; Ni =

Nic

kel;

Zn =

Zin

c; N

T =

Not

test

ed

Pag

e F2

of F

7

Det

aile

d S

ite In

vest

igat

ion

(Con

tam

inat

ion)

, Pro

pose

d P

arke

s H

ospi

tal

Pro

ject

734

66.0

1N

ewel

l Hig

hway

, Par

kes

Dec

embe

r 201

3

Tabl

e F1

: C

onta

min

ant C

once

ntra

tions

in S

oils

(Con

tinue

d)

Sam

ple/

D

epth

(m)

B

T E

X N

apth

. F1

F2

+P

AH

B

.TEQ

O

CP

OPP

PC

B

Phen

ol

Asb

esto

s A

s C

d C

r C

u Pb

H

g N

i Zn

mg/

kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

(Y/N

)m

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kg

Nat

ural

Soi

ls

PC

15/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 5

<0.4

32

13

8

<0.1

8

11

PC

16/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

39

17

11

0.

1 10

17

PC

17/0

.3-0

.4

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

42

16

9 <0

.1

9 15

PC

18/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

43

23

12

0.

1 15

27

PC

20/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

34

28

15

<0.1

15

37

PC

21/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

26

48

31

<0.1

11

32

PC

22/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

7 <0

.4

38

32

17

<0.1

14

25

PC

23/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

46

28

14

0.

3 15

29

PC

24/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

43

29

13

0.1

12

20

PC

25/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

7 <0

.4

36

34

14

0.1

15

22

PC

26/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

48

26

17

<0.1

13

29

PC

27/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

41

26

14

<0.1

12

24

PC

28/0

.6-0

.7

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

37

32

12

<0.1

11

20

PC

29/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

37

25

13

<0.1

13

29

PC

30/0

.2-0

.3

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

47

24

13

<0.1

13

26

PC

31/0

.2-0

.3

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

39

33

13

0.1

15

33

PC

32/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

7 <0

.4

45

33

9 <0

.1

13

25

PC

33/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 7

<0.4

42

25

12

<0

.1

12

23

PC

35/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

45

24

11

<0.1

14

22

PC

36/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

39

23

10

<0.1

12

19

PC

37/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

38

22

11

<0.1

10

15

PC

38/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

28

18

10

<0.1

9

22

PC

40/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

31

20

9 <0

.1

11

18

PC

41/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

28

24

13

0.1

13

32

PC

42/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

31

28

11

0.1

17

31

PC

43/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

35

28

8 <0

.1

10

19

PC

45/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

31

19

8 <0

.1

8 18

PC

46/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

35

27

10

<0

.1

14

25

PC

47/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 5

<0.4

34

18

11

0.

1 10

23

PC

48/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

44

20

12

<0.1

9

18

Not

es:

B =

Ben

zene

; T =

Tol

uene

; E =

Eth

ylbe

nzen

e; X

= X

ylen

e; N

apth

. = N

apht

hale

ne; F

1 =

(C6 –

C10

) – B

TEX

; F2

= (C

11 –

C16

) – N

apht

hale

ne; +

PA

H =

Pos

itive

pol

ycyc

lic a

rom

atic

hyd

roca

rbon

s; B

.TE

Q =

Car

cino

geni

c P

AH

s (a

s B

(a)P

TE

Q);

OC

P =

Org

anoc

hlor

ine

pest

icid

es;

OP

P =

Org

anop

hosp

horu

s pe

stic

ides

; PC

B =

Pol

ychl

orin

ated

bip

heny

ls; A

s =

Ars

enic

; Cd

= C

adm

ium

; Cr =

Chr

omiu

m; C

u =

Cop

per;

Pb

= Le

ad; H

g =

Mer

cury

; Ni =

Nic

kel;

Zn =

Zin

c; N

T =

Not

test

ed

Pag

e F3

of F

7

Det

aile

d S

ite In

vest

igat

ion

(Con

tam

inat

ion)

, Pro

pose

d P

arke

s H

ospi

tal

Pro

ject

734

66.0

1N

ewel

l Hig

hway

, Par

kes

Dec

embe

r 201

3

Tabl

e F1

: C

onta

min

ant C

once

ntra

tions

in S

oils

(Con

tinue

d)

Sam

ple/

D

epth

(m)

B

T E

X N

apth

. F1

F2

+P

AH

B

.TEQ

O

CP

OPP

PC

B

Phen

ol

Asb

esto

s A

s C

d C

r C

u Pb

H

g N

i Zn

mg/

kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

(Y/N

)m

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kg

Nat

ural

Soi

ls

PC

49/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

<4

<0

.4

30

24

11

<0.1

12

32

PC

50/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

4 <0

.4

28

22

11

<0.1

11

31

PC

51/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 4

<0.4

29

22

11

<0

.1

11

29

PC

52/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

38

30

14

0.2

11

21

PC

53/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 5

<0.4

35

29

15

0.

1 16

32

PC

54/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 7

<0.4

30

34

12

0.

1 11

22

PC

55/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 4

<0.4

29

22

12

0.

2 11

36

PC

56/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

7 <0

.4

44

44

17

0.1

17

35

PC

57/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 5

<0.4

40

29

15

<0

.1

17

39

PC

58/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

7 <0

.4

38

29

11

0.1

11

19

PC

60/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

28

33

11

<0

.1

19

45

PC

61/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

27

28

10

0.

1 16

31

PC

62/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

33

26

10

0.1

14

26

PC

63/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

31

25

9 <0

.1

12

18

PC

65/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

26

23

10

0.1

10

14

PC

66/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

23

14

7

<0.1

4

10

PC

67/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

29

23

11

<0

.1

11

18

PC

68/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

13

<0.4

37

66

16

0.

1 23

9

PC

70/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

33

32

10

0.

3 15

25

PC

71/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 62

N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 7

<0.4

34

35

13

0.

3 17

33

PC

72/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 7

<0.4

37

33

13

0.

2 13

23

PC

73/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

10

<0.4

30

39

13

0.

1 16

29

PC

74/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 7

<0.4

34

21

13

0.

1 12

25

PC

76/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

8 <0

.4

50

37

20

0.1

17

32

PC

77/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

34

32

16

0.1

20

40

PC

78/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

7 <0

.4

51

42

18

0.1

19

30

PC

79/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

5

<0.4

27

25

12

0.

1 14

30

PC

80/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

5

<0.4

31

24

12

0.

1 14

28

PC

81/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

34

27

14

0.

1 17

28

PC

82/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

7 <0

.4

28

29

12

0.1

11

18

Not

es:

B =

Ben

zene

; T =

Tol

uene

; E =

Eth

ylbe

nzen

e; X

= X

ylen

e; N

apth

. = N

apht

hale

ne; F

1 =

(C6 –

C10

) – B

TEX

; F2

= (C

11 –

C16

) – N

apht

hale

ne; +

PA

H =

Pos

itive

pol

ycyc

lic a

rom

atic

hyd

roca

rbon

s; B

.TE

Q =

Car

cino

geni

c P

AH

s (a

s B

(a)P

TE

Q);

OC

P =

Org

anoc

hlor

ine

pest

icid

es;

OP

P =

Org

anop

hosp

horu

s pe

stic

ides

; PC

B =

Pol

ychl

orin

ated

bip

heny

ls; A

s =

Ars

enic

; Cd

= C

adm

ium

; Cr =

Chr

omiu

m; C

u =

Cop

per;

Pb

= Le

ad; H

g =

Mer

cury

; Ni =

Nic

kel;

Zn =

Zin

c; N

T =

Not

test

ed

Pag

e F4

of F

7

Det

aile

d S

ite In

vest

igat

ion

(Con

tam

inat

ion)

, Pro

pose

d P

arke

s H

ospi

tal

Pro

ject

734

66.0

1N

ewel

l Hig

hway

, Par

kes

Dec

embe

r 201

3

Tabl

e F1

: C

onta

min

ant C

once

ntra

tions

in S

oils

(Con

tinue

d)

Sam

ple/

D

epth

(m)

B

T E

X N

apth

. F1

F2

+P

AH

B

.TEQ

O

CP

OPP

PC

B

Phen

ol

Asb

esto

s A

s C

d C

r C

u Pb

H

g N

i Zn

mg/

kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

(Y/N

)m

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kg

Nat

ural

Soi

ls

PC

83/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 8

<0.4

33

23

12

0.

2 14

25

PC

84/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

4 <0

.4

29

21

10

0.2

12

23

PC

85/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

<4

<0.4

26

16

10

0.

1 8

16

PC

86/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

25

31

13

0.2

10

18

PC

87/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 4

<0.4

24

21

10

0.

3 10

21

PC

88/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

8 <0

.4

29

42

11

0.1

13

22

PC

89/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

28

31

14

0.

1 14

29

PC

90/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

7 <0

.4

32

28

15

0.1

12

33

PC

91/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 7

<0.4

28

33

12

0.

1 16

34

PC

93/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

11

<0.4

39

54

13

0.

1 22

28

PC

94/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 14

<0

.4

41

69

26

0.1

35

12

PC

95/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 8

<0.4

31

33

10

0.

1 9

17

PC

96/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 5

<0.4

19

18

8

0.1

7 16

PC

97/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

95

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

9 <0

.4

15

88

7 0.

1 11

12

PC

99/0

-0.1

<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

38

26

12

0.

1 12

20

PC

100/

0.1-

0.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

42

23

12

0.2

11

20

PC

101/

0-0.

1 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

39

29

13

0.

1 16

27

PC

103/

0.5-

0.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

44

18

10

<0.1

8

13

PC

104/

0-0.

1 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

53

17

12

<0

.1

9 18

PC

105/

0.1-

0.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

39

12

10

<0.1

8

12

PC

106/

0-0.

1 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 7

<0.4

39

11

8

<0.1

6

6

PC

108/

0.5-

0.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

9 <0

.4

31

36

10

<0.1

12

12

PC

109/

0-0.

1 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 9

<0.4

33

23

10

<0

.1

9 11

PC

110/

0-0.

1 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 8.

2 1

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

21

<0.4

39

28

19

<0

.1

13

36

PC

111/

0-0.

1 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

37

9

9 <0

.1

6 9

PC

113/

0.8-

0.9

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

7 <0

.4

18

18

8 <0

.1

13

10

PC

114/

0-0.

1 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 5

<0.4

28

8

7 <0

.1

5 7

PC

115/

0-0.

1 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 5

<0.4

51

19

11

<0

.1

11

18

PC

116/

0-0.

1 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

43

27

14

<0

.1

16

25

PC11

8-0.

5-0.

6 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

38

29

15

<0

.1

13

23

Not

es:

B =

Ben

zene

; T =

Tol

uene

; E =

Eth

ylbe

nzen

e; X

= X

ylen

e; N

apth

. = N

apht

hale

ne; F

1 =

(C6 –

C10

) – B

TEX

; F2

= (C

11 –

C16

) – N

apht

hale

ne; +

PA

H =

Pos

itive

pol

ycyc

lic a

rom

atic

hyd

roca

rbon

s; B

.TE

Q =

Car

cino

geni

c P

AH

s (a

s B

(a)P

TE

Q);

OC

P =

Org

anoc

hlor

ine

pest

icid

es;

OP

P =

Org

anop

hosp

horu

s pe

stic

ides

; PC

B =

Pol

ychl

orin

ated

bip

heny

ls; A

s =

Ars

enic

; Cd

= C

adm

ium

; Cr =

Chr

omiu

m; C

u =

Cop

per;

Pb

= Le

ad; H

g =

Mer

cury

; Ni =

Nic

kel;

Zn =

Zin

c; N

T =

Not

test

ed

Pag

e F5

of F

7

Det

aile

d S

ite In

vest

igat

ion

(Con

tam

inat

ion)

, Pro

pose

d P

arke

s H

ospi

tal

Pro

ject

734

66.0

1N

ewel

l Hig

hway

, Par

kes

Dec

embe

r 201

3

Tabl

e F1

: C

onta

min

ant C

once

ntra

tions

in S

oils

(Con

tinue

d)

Sam

ple/

D

epth

(m)

B

T E

X N

apth

. F1

F2

+P

AH

B

.TEQ

O

CP

OPP

PC

B

Phen

ol

Asb

esto

s A

s C

d C

r C

u Pb

H

g N

i Zn

mg/

kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

(Y/N

)m

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kg

Nat

ural

Soi

ls

PC

119/

0-0.

1 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

42

28

15

<0

.1

13

24

PP

1/0.

1-0.

2<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 5

<0.4

34

21

11

0.

2 12

23

PP

2/0.

1-0.

2<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

38

27

12

0.

2 17

31

PP

3/0.

1-0.

2<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

41

29

13

0.

2 14

31

PP

4/0.

5-0.

6<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 5

<0.4

30

31

10

0.

1 10

21

PP

5/0-

0.1

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

N

5 <0

.4

36

23

13

<0.1

13

28

PP

6/0-

0.1

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

50

24

13

<0.1

9

19

PP

7/0.

5-0.

6<0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 7

<0.4

33

34

12

<0

.1

14

21

PG

1/0.

5-0.

6 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

41

28

13

<0

.1

10

20

PG

2/0-

0.1

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

<4

<0.4

29

20

11

<0

.1

9 20

PG

3/0-

0.1

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

4 <0

.4

28

21

9 <0

.1

10

17

PG

4/0.

5-0.

6 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 14

<0

.4

35

27

12

<0.1

12

23

PG

5/0.

1-0.

2 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 5

<0.4

37

23

9

0.2

12

22

PG

6/0-

0.1

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

4 <0

.4

30

24

10

<0.1

10

23

PG

7/0.

1-0.

2 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

36

26

12

<0

.1

10

20

PG

8/0.

5-0.

6 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

37

26

12

<0

.1

11

24

PG

9/0.

1-0.

2 <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

37

29

10

<0

.1

16

27

PG

10/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

37

33

15

<0.1

17

39

PG

11/0

.1-0

.2

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

39

27

13

<0.1

15

34

PG

12/0

.5-0

.6

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

48

24

13

<0.1

12

24

Not

es:

B =

Ben

zene

; T =

Tol

uene

; E =

Eth

ylbe

nzen

e; X

= X

ylen

e; N

apth

. = N

apht

hale

ne; F

1 =

(C6 –

C10

) – B

TEX

; F2

= (C

11 –

C16

) – N

apht

hale

ne; +

PA

H =

Pos

itive

pol

ycyc

lic a

rom

atic

hyd

roca

rbon

s; B

.TE

Q =

Car

cino

geni

c P

AH

s (a

s B

(a)P

TE

Q);

OC

P =

Org

anoc

hlor

ine

pest

icid

es;

OP

P =

Org

anop

hosp

horu

s pe

stic

ides

; PC

B =

Pol

ychl

orin

ated

bip

heny

ls; A

s =

Ars

enic

; Cd

= C

adm

ium

; Cr =

Chr

omiu

m; C

u =

Cop

per;

Pb

= Le

ad; H

g =

Mer

cury

; Ni =

Nic

kel;

Zn =

Zin

c; N

T =

Not

test

ed

Pag

e F6

of F

7

Det

aile

d S

ite In

vest

igat

ion

(Con

tam

inat

ion)

, Pro

pose

d P

arke

s H

ospi

tal

Pro

ject

734

66.0

1N

ewel

l Hig

hway

, Par

kes

Dec

embe

r 201

3

Tabl

e F2

: C

onta

min

ant C

once

ntra

tions

in Q

A/Q

C S

ampl

es

Sam

ple

B

T E

X N

apth

. F1

F2

+P

AH

B

.TEQ

O

CP

OPP

PC

B

Phen

ol

Asb

esto

s A

s C

d C

r C

u Pb

H

g N

i Zn

mg/

kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

(Y/N

)m

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kg

QA

/QC

Soi

l Sam

ples

TS2A

(PC

5/0.

1-0.

2)

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

4 <0

.4

31

22

13

<0.1

12

27

TS2B

(PC

5/0.

1-0.

2)

<0.1

<0

.1

<0.1

<0

.3

<0.5

<2

0 <5

0 N

IL

0.6

<2.2

<4

.5

<3.5

<0

.1

NT

6.5

0.5

41

31

14

<0.0

5 15

39

TS5A

(PC

79/0

-0.1

) <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 6

<0.4

30

25

11

<0

.1

13

29

TA5B

(PC

79/0

-0.1

) <0

.1

<0.1

<0

.1

<0.3

<0

.5

<20

<50

NIL

0.

6 <2

.2

<4.5

<3

.5

<0.1

N

T 7.

3 0.

5 40

24

11

<0

.05

13

26

TS7A

(PC

35/0

.1-0

.2)

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

<4

<0.4

29

22

12

<0

.1

12

23

TS7B

(PC

35/0

.1-0

.2)

<0.1

<0

.1

<0.1

<0

.3

<0.5

<2

0 <5

0 N

IL

0.6

<2.2

<4

.5

<3.5

<0

.1

NT

6.2

<0.4

29

29

12

<0

.5

15

29

TS9A

(PC

18/0

-0.1

) <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

<2

<0

.8

<0.7

<5

N

T 4

<0.4

33

17

9

<0.1

10

19

TS9B

(PC

18/0

-0.1

) <0

.1

<0.1

<0

.1

<0.3

<0

.5

<20

<50

NIL

0.

6 <2

.2

<4.5

<3

.5

<0.1

N

T 12

<0

.4

34

18

9 <0

.05

11

22

TS12

A(PC

43/0

.5-0

.6)

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

6 <0

.4

34

34

7 <0

.1

14

18

TS12

B(PC

43/0

.5-0

.6)

<0.1

<0

.1

<0.1

<0

.3

<0.5

<2

0 <5

0 N

IL

0.6

<2.2

<4

.5

<3.5

<0

.1

NT

11

<0.4

29

27

5.

9 <0

.05

10

15

TS13

A(PC

58/0

.5-0

.6)

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

5 <0

.4

26

23

9 0.

2 14

36

TS13

B(PC

58/0

.5-0

.6)

<0.1

<0

.1

<0.1

<0

.3

<0.5

<2

0 <5

0 N

IL

0.6

<2.2

<4

.5

<3.5

<0

.1

NT

13

<0.4

33

35

9.

3 <0

.05

19

35

TS17

A(PC

97/0

.5-0

.6)

<0.2

<0

.5

<1

<3

<1

<25

<50

NIL

<0

.5

<2

<0.8

<0

.7

<5

NT

9 <0

.4

16

89

8 <0

.1

11

13

TS17

B(PC

97/0

.5-0

.6)

<0.1

<0

.1

<0.1

<0

.3

<0.5

<2

0 <5

0 N

IL

0.6

<2.2

<4

.5

<3.5

<0

.1

NT

14

<0.4

12

89

6.

9 <0

.05

11

10

Blan

k <0

.2

<0.5

<1

<3

<1

<2

5 <5

0 N

IL

<0.5

N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T

Spi

ke95

%

81%

71

%

71%

N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T N

T

QA

/QC

Wat

er S

ampl

es (

g/L)

R1-

13/8

<1

<1

<1

<3

<1

<1

0 <5

0 N

IL

<5

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

<50

<10

<10

<10

<30

<0.5

<2

0 <2

0

R2-

14/8

<1

<1

<1

<3

<1

<1

0 <5

0 N

IL

<5

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

<50

<10

<10

<10

<30

<0.5

<2

0 <2

0

R3-

15/8

<1

<1

<1

<3

<1

<1

0 <5

0 N

IL

<5

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

<50

<10

<10

<10

<30

<0.5

<2

0 <2

0

R1-

19/8

<1

<1

<1

<3

<1

<1

0 <5

0 N

IL

<5

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

<50

<10

<10

<10

<30

<0.5

<2

0 <2

0

R2-

20/8

<1

<1

<1

<3

<1

<1

0 <5

0 N

IL

<5

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

<50

<10

<10

<10

<30

<0.5

<2

0 <2

0

R3-

21/8

<1

<1

<1

<3

<1

<1

0 <5

0 N

IL

<5

NT

NT

NT

NT

NT

<50

<10

<10

<10

<30

<0.5

<2

0 <2

0

Not

es:

B =

Ben

zene

; T =

Tol

uene

; E =

Eth

ylbe

nzen

e; X

= X

ylen

e; N

apth

. = N

apht

hale

ne; F

1 =

(C6 –

C10

) – B

TEX

; F2

= (C

11 –

C16

) – N

apht

hale

ne; +

PA

H =

Pos

itive

pol

ycyc

lic a

rom

atic

hyd

roca

rbon

s; B

.TE

Q =

Car

cino

geni

c P

AH

s (a

s B

(a)P

TE

Q);

OC

P =

Org

anoc

hlor

ine

pest

icid

es;

OP

P =

Org

anop

hosp

horu

s pe

stic

ides

; PC

B =

Pol

ychl

orin

ated

bip

heny

ls; A

s =

Ars

enic

; Cd

= C

adm

ium

; Cr =

Chr

omiu

m; C

u =

Cop

per;

Pb

= Le

ad; H

g =

Mer

cury

; Ni =

Nic

kel;

Zn =

Zin

c; N

T =

Not

test

ed

Pag

e F7

of F

7

Det

aile

d S

ite In

vest

igat

ion

(Con

tam

inat

ion)

, Pro

pose

d P

arke

s H

ospi

tal

Pro

ject

734

66.0

1N

ewel

l Hig

hway

, Par

kes

Dec

embe

r 201

3

Tabl

e F3

: St

atis

tical

Ana

lysi

s of

Con

tam

inan

t Con

cent

ratio

ns

Sam

ple/

D

epth

(m)

B

T E

X N

apth

. F1

F2

+P

AH

B

.TEQ

O

CP

OPP

PC

B

Phen

ol

Asb

esto

s A

s C

d C

r C

u Pb

H

g N

i Zn

mg/

kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

(Y/N

)m

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kg

Stat

istic

al A

naly

sis

of S

tock

pile

d Fi

lling

Con

tam

inan

t Con

cent

ratio

ns (m

g/kg

)

Max

imum

0

0 0

0 0

0 0

63

10

0 0

0 0

17

0

31

58

53

0.1

17

130

Aver

age

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 4.

2 0.

7 0

0 0

0

5.8

0 26

.2

25.4

16

.1

0.1

12.1

50

.6

Std.

Dev

iatio

n 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

N/A

N

/A

0 0

0 0

3.

3 0

2.9

9.8

10.4

0

2.3

31.1

95%

UC

L 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

N/A

N

/A

0 0

0 0

7.

4 0

37.5

29

.9

20.8

N

/A

13.1

64

.7

Stat

istic

al A

naly

sis

of N

atur

al S

oil C

onta

min

ant C

once

ntra

tions

(mg/

kg)

Max

imum

0

0 0

0 0

0 95

8.

2 1

0 0

0 0

21

0

53

88

31

0.4

35

86

Aver

age

0 0

0 0

0 0

1.3

0.6

0 0

0 0

0

6.4

0 35

.8

26.7

12

.3

0.1

12.5

24

.2

Std.

Dev

iatio

n 0

0 0

0 0

0 N

/A

N/A

N

/A

0 0

0 0

2.

2 0

7.3

10.9

3.

5 0.

1 4

10.6

95%

UC

L 0

0 0

0 0

0 N

/A

N/A

N

/A

0 0

0 0

6.

7 0

36.9

28

.3

12.8

0.

2 13

.1

25.8

Stat

istic

al A

naly

sis

of A

ll Pr

imar

y So

il Sa

mpl

e C

onta

min

ant C

once

ntra

tions

(mg/

kg)

Max

imum

0

0 0

0 0

0 95

63

10

0

0 0

0

21

0 53

88

53

0.

4 35

13

0

Aver

age

0 0

0 0

0 0

1.2

0.5

0.1

0 0

0 0

6.

3 0

34.8

26

.6

12.7

0.

1 12

.5

27.1

Std

. Dev

iatio

n 0

0 0

0 0

0 N

/A

N/A

N

/A

0 0

0 0

2.

3 0

7.5

10.8

4.

8 0.

1 3.

9 16

.3

95%

UC

L 0

0 0

0 0

0 N

/A

N/A

N

/A

0 0

0 0

6.

6 0

35.9

28

.1

13.4

0.

2 13

.0

29.4

Not

es:

B =

Ben

zene

; T =

Tol

uene

; E =

Eth

ylbe

nzen

e; X

= X

ylen

e; N

apth

. = N

apht

hale

ne; F

1 =

(C6 –

C10

) – B

TEX

; F2

= (C

11 –

C16

) – N

apht

hale

ne; +

PA

H =

Pos

itive

pol

ycyc

lic a

rom

atic

hyd

roca

rbon

s; B

.TE

Q =

Car

cino

geni

c P

AH

s (a

s B

(a)P

TE

Q);

OC

P =

Org

anoc

hlor

ine

pest

icid

es;

OP

P =

Org

anop

hosp

horu

s pe

stic

ides

; PC

B =

Pol

ychl

orin

ated

bip

heny

ls; A

s =

Ars

enic

; Cd

= C

adm

ium

; Cr =

Chr

omiu

m; C

u =

Cop

per;

Pb

= Le

ad; H

g =

Mer

cury

; Ni =

Nic

kel;

Zn =

Zin

c; N

A =

Not

app

licab

le

Tabl

e F4

: A

dopt

ed C

ompa

rativ

e C

riter

ia

Sam

ple/

D

epth

(m)

B

T E

X N

apth

. F1

F2

+P

AH

B

.TEQ

O

CP

OPP

PC

B

Phen

ol

Asb

esto

s A

s C

d C

r C

u Pb

H

g N

i Zn

mg/

kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

(Y/N

)m

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kgm

g/kg

mg/

kg

Ado

pted

Inve

stig

atio

n/Sc

reen

ing

Leve

ls (m

g/kg

)

Hea

lth-B

ased

1 4

NL

NL

NL

NL

250

NL

4000

40

Va

rious

Va

rious

7

2400

00

30

00

900

3600

24

0000

15

00

730

6000

40

0000

Eco

logi

cal2

370

16

0

700

310

1810

300

640

Not

es:

B =

Ben

zene

; T =

Tol

uene

; E =

Eth

ylbe

nzen

e; X

= X

ylen

e; N

apth

. = N

apht

hale

ne; F

1 =

(C6 –

C10

) – B

TEX

; F2

= (C

11 –

C16

) – N

apht

hale

ne; +

PA

H =

Pos

itive

pol

ycyc

lic a

rom

atic

hyd

roca

rbon

s; B

.TE

Q =

Car

cino

geni

c P

AH

s (a

s B

(a)P

TE

Q);

OC

P =

Org

anoc

hlor

ine

pest

icid

es;

OP

P =

Org

anop

hosp

horu

s pe

stic

ides

; PC

B =

Pol

ychl

orin

ated

bip

heny

ls; A

s =

Ars

enic

; Cd

= C

adm

ium

; Cr =

Chr

omiu

m; C

u =

Cop

per;

Pb

= Le

ad; H

g =

Mer

cury

; Ni =

Nic

kel;

Zn =

Zin

c; N

T =

Not

test

ed

1 Bas

ed o

n N

EP

M C

omm

erci

al/In

dust

rial S

ites;

2 Bas

ed o

n N

EP

M A

CLs

and

ave

rage

bac

kgro

und

conc

entra

tions

from

nat

ural

soi

l sam

ples

ana

lyse

d

Appendix G

Detailed Laboratory Test Results

report on detailed site investigation (contamination

Documents