report covers front back.indd 1 14/03/2013 13:04 · pdf file5 bs en iso 14688-2: 2004 + a1:...
TRANSCRIPT
Report Covers front back.indd 1 14/03/2013 13:04
Project No: TA7329 Document No. F01 BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
15/04/2014 Page 1 of 11
REPORT QUALITY ASSURANCE SHEET Title:
REPORT ON A
GROUND INVESTIGATION
FOR
BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
Report Status: Description: Date: Compiled By: Checked By: Approved By:
Draft Factual 21/03/2014 F. J. Hales I. Swain P. A. Rodgers
Final Factual 15/04/2014 T. Emson I. Swain M. J. Baldwin
Distribution: Mott MacDonald Ltd
The report is not to be used for contractual or engineering purposes unless this sheet is signed where indicated by both the originator of the report and the approver, and the report is designated “Final” on this report quality assurance sheet. Opinions and interpretations expressed in the report are outside the scope of UKAS accreditation. This report has been prepared for the sole internal use and reliance of the named Employer. This report should not be relied upon or transferred to any other parties without the express written authorisation of Soil Engineering. If an unauthorised third party comes into possession of the report, they rely on it at their peril and Soil Engineering owes them no duty of care and skill. Report No. SE-RRG-F-001 Issue.Revision Number 3.00 Issue Date 20/05/2013
Project No: TA7329 Document No. F01 BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
15/04/2014 Page 2 of 11
GROUND INVESTIGATION: BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
REPORT CONTENTS
REPORT QUALITY ASSURANCE SHEET ......................................................................................................... 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 5
2.0 PURPOSE, SCOPE AND REPORT FORMAT ........................................................................................ 5
2.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Scope of Work ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Limitations ............................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Report Format ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5
3.0 DESK STUDY INFORMATION ........................................................................................................... 6
3.1 Scope of Study ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Site Location and Description .......................................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Geology ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Previous Investigations ....................................................................................................................................................... 6
4.0 FIELDWORK ...................................................................................................................................... 6
4.1 Scope of Fieldwork ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 4.2 Inspection Pits ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 4.3 Cable Percussion Boreholes .............................................................................................................................................. 7 4.4 Rotary Drilling ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 4.5 Dynamic Sampling ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 4.6 In situ Testing ......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 4.7 Installations / Instrumentation ........................................................................................................................................ 8 4.8 Groundwater and Gas Monitoring ................................................................................................................................. 8
5.0 LABORATORY TESTING ..................................................................................................................... 9
5.1 Scope of Testing .................................................................................................................................................................... 9 5.2 Geotechnical Soils Testing ................................................................................................................................................ 9 5.3 Geotechnical Rock Testing ................................................................................................................................................ 9 5.4 Environmental Testing ........................................................................................................................................................ 9
6.0 RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION ................................................................................................... 9
6.1 Scope of Commentary ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 6.2 Made Ground ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 6.3 Superficial Deposits ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 6.4 Triassic Strata ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 6.5 Groundwater ......................................................................................................................................................................... 10 6.6 Gas Monitoring .................................................................................................................................................................... 10
REPORT REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 11
LIST OF TABLES Section
Table 1 Summary of Groundwater Inflows Recorded in Exploratory Holes Section A Table 2 Groundwater Level Readings for Exploratory Hole Installations Section A Table 3 Results of Gas Monitoring Section A
Project No: TA7329 Document No. F01 BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
15/04/2014 Page 3 of 11
GROUND INVESTIGATION: BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
REPORT CONTENTS (Continued)
LIST OF FIGURES Section
Figure 1 Site Location Plan Section C Figure 2 Exploratory Hole Location Plan Section C
SUPPORTING FACTUAL DATA
SECTION A: EXPLORATORY HOLE RECORDS AND FIELD DATA
• Exploratory Hole Log Legend and Notation Sheet• Cable Percussion and Rotary Drilling Records• Dynamic Sampling Records• In Situ Testing Records• Groundwater / Gas Monitoring Results
SECTION B: LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
• Laboratory Test Data Key Sheet• Laboratory Soil Test Summary Sheets• Laboratory Soil Test Data Sheets• Laboratory Rock Test Summary Sheets• Laboratory Rock Test Data Sheets• Chemical Test Results
SECTION C: SITE PLANS
• Site Location Plan• Exploratory Hole Location Plan
SECTION D: PHOTOGRAPHS
• Core Photographs
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1: NOTES ON FIELDWORK, LOGGING AND LABORATORY TESTING
• Notes on Fieldwork Procedures• Terminology used in Soil Descriptions• Terminology used in the Description of Made Ground• Terminology used in the Description and Classification of Rock• Assessment of Aggressive Ground and Groundwater Conditions
Project No: TA7329 Document No. F01 BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
15/04/2014 Page 4 of 11
GROUND INVESTIGATION: BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
REPORT CONTENTS (Continued)
APPENDIX 2:
• SPT calibration Certificates
Project No: TA7329 Document No. F01 BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
15/04/2014 Page 5 of 11
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In January 2014 Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd were instructed by Mott MacDonald Ltd (The Engineer) acting for and on behalf of Burton and South Derbyshire College (The Employer) to carry out a ground investigation in Burton Upon Trent within the car park to the rear of the town hall annex building. It is proposed to construct a four storey building within the existing car park. The investigation comprised the formation of cable percussion boreholes selectively extended by rotary drilling techniques together with dynamic windowless sampling and in situ testing.
This factual report presents the results of the fieldwork and laboratory testing undertaken together with information on the ground and groundwater conditions encountered. The fieldwork was carried out between 18th and 27th February 2014.
2.0 PURPOSE, SCOPE AND REPORT FORMAT
2.1 Purpose
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the subsurface ground and groundwater conditions at the site of the proposed building. This information was obtained from a combination of intrusive investigation techniques and laboratory testing.
2.2 Scope of Work
The brief for this factual report comprised the following items:
1. To form exploratory holes on site.2. To install gas and groundwater monitoring instruments.3. To monitor on site installations.4. To undertake laboratory tests on samples recovered from exploratory holes.
The sources of information used in the compilation of this report are detailed in the list of references on page 10.
2.3 Limitations
This report has been prepared in accordance with the project specification. Soil Engineering accepts no liability for any deficiencies in the report that arise from the specification’s non-compliance with either European or British Standards. This particularly applies to exploratory hole spacings and depths and to the scope of laboratory testing.
It should be noted that the investigation data on which this report is based is only indicative of the actual ground, groundwater and ground gas conditions that exist at the locations of the exploratory holes and may not be representative of the conditions that exist on the site as a whole.
2.4 Report Format
This report is presented in the following format:
Factual information comprising: - • Description of fieldwork• Exploratory hole logs• Laboratory test results
Project No: TA7329 Document No. F01 BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
15/04/2014 Page 6 of 11
• Maps and plans• Photographs
3.0 DESK STUDY INFORMATION
3.1 Scope of Study
A formal comprehensive (phase I) desk study was not requested by the Engineer for this investigation. The following sections however provide general details of site location and description, together with site geology as ascertained from published maps.
3.2 Site Location and Description
The existing Town Hall annex is located off King Edward Place in the centre of Burton upon Trent (approximate National Grid Reference SK 242 235). The site comprises an area of land currently used as a car park, which is bordered by generally residential areas..
During the investigation, our engineer noted that the site comprised a level tarmacadam car park.
Site levels vary between approximately 45.00m AOD and 47.00m AOD.
The location of the site is indicated on Figure 1 in Section C of this report.
3.3 Geology
From the available information on the 1:50,000 scale Geological Survey map of the area1 the site is shown to be underlain by First River Terrace deposits (now known as Holme Pierrepont Sand and Gravel Member)., underlying this Keuper Marl (now known as Mercia Mudstone) of Triassic age is shown.
3.4 Previous Investigations
The Engineer did not supply details of any previous investigations in relation to this investigation.
4.0 FIELDWORK
4.1 Scope of Fieldwork
The scope of the fieldwork was specified by the Engineer and was undertaken in general accordance with Eurocodes2 and, where there is no conflict, also with BS 59303. Soil and rock logging has been undertaken in accordance with the relevant European Standards4,5,6, listed in the references for this report. In accordance with the specification and drawings provided by the Engineer, Soil Engineering were required to set out and survey the exploratory holes and to undertake the testing and sampling regime. Cable percussion boreholes selectively extended by rotary drilling were formed together with dynamic windowless sampling and in situ testing. The exploratory hole locations are shown on the site plan presented in Section C of this report.
1 Sheet 140: 1953, Solid and Drift edition for Burton Upon Trent 2 Eurocode 7 Part 2 (BS EN 1997-2: 2007) 3 BS 5930: 1999 + A2: 2010 4 BS EN ISO 14688-1: 2002: Geotechnical Investigation and testing – Identification and Classification of Soil – Part 1: Identification and Description. 5 BS EN ISO 14688-2: 2004 + A1: 2013: Geotechnical Investigation and testing – Identification and Classification of Soil – Part 2: Principles for a Classification 6 BS EN ISO 14689-1: 2003: Geotechnical Investigation and testing – Identification and Classification of Rock – Part 1: Identification and description.
Project No: TA7329 Document No. F01 BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
15/04/2014 Page 7 of 11
4.2 Inspection Pits
In order to reduce the risk of damaging buried services, the location of each exploratory hole was scanned using a cable avoidance tool (CAT). As a further precaution, an inspection pit was hand excavated to a depth of 1.20m at each location, followed by a further scan of the base of each pit with the CAT.
4.3 Cable Percussion Boreholes
A total of five boreholes designated BH01 to BH05 inclusive were formed to depths between 9.30m and 10.40m using conventional light cable percussion techniques together with 150mm diameter temporary steel casings. The boreholes were all formed in order to obtain samples for laboratory testing and to provide geotechnical information for foundation design. The two boreholes not extended by rotary coring (BH03 and BH05) were also used for the installation of combined groundwater and gas monitoring wells.
102mm nominal diameter open tube samples (U100) were obtained at regular intervals throughout the boring operations where suitable cohesive materials were encountered. These were sealed with wax to prevent moisture loss and were transported to the Leeds laboratory of Soil Engineering.
In both granular and cohesive material or where the presence of coarse material prevented the taking of open tube samples, Standard Penetration Tests7 were carried out using either a split spoon sampler or a solid 60o cone. The results of these tests are given as a Standard Penetration “N” value or as a blow count for a given penetration at the appropriate position on the borehole logs, where the use of either the sampler or cone is also recorded.
Representative disturbed samples of all materials encountered were obtained and these were placed in sealed containers for transport to the laboratory.
Where required environmental samples were obtained for chemical testing. The headspace in each environmental sample was subjected to PID monitoring, the results of which are presented in Section A of this report.
The samples recovered from the boreholes were described by an Engineering Geologist, in accordance with the terminology presented in Appendix 1 of this report. A detailed description of all strata encountered, groundwater conditions and the position and type of samples taken are included on the borehole logs presented in Section A of this report.
4.4 Rotary Drilling
In order to obtain information on the solid geology beneath the site boreholes BH01, BH02 and BH04 were extended using rotary drilling techniques. These boreholes were extended to depths between 20.30m and 20.50m, using a PWF core barrel together with a protective semi rigid plastic liner and a Polycrystalline Diamond (PCD) core bit with water flush to produce cores of 90mm nominal diameter. All three boreholes were also used for the installation of combined groundwater and gas monitoring wells.
Details of the strata encountered are given on the borehole logs along with the Engineering Geologist’s assessment of Total Core Recovery (TCR), Solid Core Recovery (SCR), and Rock Quality Designation (RQD) each expressed as a percentage of the individual core runs. Where applicable a fracture spacing (If) has also been determined and this information is given on the logs.
The symbols and abbreviations used on the rotary borehole logs are explained on the exploratory hole log
7 BS EN ISO 22476-3:2005 + A1: 2011: Geotechnical Investigation and Testing – Field Testing – Part 3: Standard Penetration Test.
Project No: TA7329 Document No. F01 BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
15/04/2014 Page 8 of 11
legend and notation sheet presented in Section A of this report.
The core samples recovered were transported to the Leeds laboratory of Soil Engineering where they were photographed, sampled and described by an Engineering Geologist in accordance with the terminology presented in Appendix 1 of this report. The borehole logs are presented in Section A of this report and photographic records are presented in Section D of this report.
4.5 Dynamic Sampling
Five probe holes designated WS01 to WS05 inclusive were formed to depths between 3.30m and 5.00m using conventional equipment, which comprised 1.00m long steel cylinders with an internal plastic liner. The steel cylinders were repeatedly driven into the ground to progressive depths using rods connected to a hand held motor driven percussion hammer. WS01 and WS03 were also used for the installation of combined groundwater and gas monitoring wells.
Disturbed representative samples of the strata being penetrated were recovered from the window sampler for geotechnical description and laboratory testing. The depths of the samples recovered are shown on the relevant exploratory hole logs presented in Section A of this report.
4.6 In situ Testing
In order to obtain an indication of the in situ structural properties of the ground, in situ TRL DCP (Dynamic Cone Penetrometer) testing was carried out from ground level at locations adjacent to BH02, BH05 and WS03.
The testing was carried out using a 60˚ cone of 20mm maximum diameter, connected by rods to an 8kg hammer which was repeatedly dropped through a height of 575mm. Readings of penetration were taken at regular intervals from an integrated measuring rule.
Testing was carried out in accordance with the TRL technical information note for dynamic cone penetrometer tests and the manufacturer’s instructions. The results are presented in Section A of this report.
4.7 Installations / Instrumentation
A 50mm diameter HDPE tube was installed in each borehole as well as dynamic sampling hole WS01 and a 19mm diameter HDPE tube was installed in WS03. This tubing was slotted over a predetermined section of the exploratory holes with the slotted section being surrounded by pea gravel, which was sealed with bentonite pellets. A metal stopcock cover was concreted into place on each of the installations and a plastic cap with a gas valve was placed onto each tube to facilitate long-term groundwater and gas monitoring. A schematic of each installation is shown on the relevant exploratory hole log presented in Section A of this report.
4.8 Groundwater and Gas Monitoring
In accordance with the Engineer’s instruction monitoring of groundwater and gas in all installations was carried out at weekly intervals for six weeks after completion of the site works. Monitoring for methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide and oxygen gases was carried out using a Geotechnical Instruments GA5000 gas analyser. Where practical, visits to site were made on days of low or falling barometric pressure in order to try and record the more onerous gas conditions. At the time of writing this draft report, not all monitoring had been completed however the results to date are presented in Section A of this report.
Project No: TA7329 Document No. F01 BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
15/04/2014 Page 9 of 11
On one of the monitoring visits, water samples for environmental testing were collected from the installations.
5.0 LABORATORY TESTING
5.1 Scope of Testing
All geotechnical (soils and rock) and chemical (environmental) testing was specified and scheduled by the Engineer. The scope of the testing was required to assist the Engineer in any foundation design to be made and in establishing any potential site contamination levels.
5.2 Geotechnical Soils Testing
The programme of laboratory testing was carried out in accordance with BS 13778. The testing was carried out at the Leeds laboratory of Soil Engineering, a UKAS accredited testing laboratory No 1265.
Results are given on the summary sheets with individual test plots presented in Section B of this report.
In addition, chemical (sulfate and pH) testing was undertaken by Chemtest, a UKAS accredited testing laboratory No. 2183. Testing was undertaken in order to assess concrete requirements from BRE Special Digest No 19. Samples were prepared in general accordance with BS 1377, although final analysis of total sulfate was performed using ICP and aqueous extract using Ion Chromatography.
5.3 Geotechnical Rock Testing
In order to provide an indication of the strength of the rock encountered within boreholes BH01, BH02 and BH04 point load testing was undertaken on selected core samples, due to the fractured nature of the cores UCS testing was not possible. These tests were performed in accordance with the specifications
10
indicated on the individual test plots.
Results are presented in Section B of this report. .
5.4 Environmental Testing
A programme of environmental testing was scheduled by the Engineer. Testing was carried out by Chemtest, a UKAS accredited testing laboratory No. 2183.
Testing was carried out in accordance with the methods identified in the test reports.
The results of the environmental testing are presented in Section B of this report.
6.0 RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION
6.1 Scope of Commentary
The results of this investigation appear to broadly concur with the published geology summarised in Section 3.3 of this report. The following sections are only intended to provide a summary of the ground conditions encountered during this investigation whilst the logs presented in Section A of this report give a
8 BS 1377: 1990: Parts 1 to 9: Methods of Test for Soils For Civil Engineering Purposes. British Standards Institution 9 BRE Special Digest 1: 2005: Concrete in Aggressive Ground. BRE Construction Division. 10 Rock Characterization Testing and Monitoring- ISRM Suggested Method for Determining Point Load Strength-1985
Project No: TA7329 Document No. F01 BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
15/04/2014 Page 10 of 11
detailed account of all the strata observed.
6.2 Made Ground
Made ground was encountered to depths between 0.40m and 2.40m in all of the exploratory holes. This was seen to comprise variable layers of sand and gravel sized fragments comprising of a mix of ash, clinker, house brick and sandstone although locally other materials were also identified.
6.3 Superficial Deposits
Underlying the made ground generally sand and gravel was encountered in the exploratory holes. This granular layer was noted to extend to depths of up to 7.80m. All the dynamic windowless sample holes terminated within the superficial deposits.
6.4 Triassic Strata
Boreholes BH01, BH02 and BH04 were extended into rock in order to assess the solid geology. The boreholes encountered very weak to weak reddish brown mudstone and this extended to completion of the boreholes at depths of 20.30m to 20.50m. Between 6.10m and 7.90m, where rockhead was encountered, to between 8.00m and 9.50m the mudstone was found to be highly weathered and recovered as gravelly clay.
6.5 Groundwater
Groundwater was encountered in all of the boreholes with the exception of BH03. A summary of exploratory hole groundwater inflows is given in Table 1 in Section A, whilst the logs presented in Section A of this report provide full details of all groundwater information.
6.6 Gas Monitoring
The results of the gas monitoring to date are presented in Section A of this report. The monitoring produced no detectable Methane or hydrogen sulphide. Carbon Monoxide was detected generally in the range 1ppm to 7ppm, Carbon Dioxide was detected in the range 0.1% to 3.5% whilst Oxygen levels were in the range 17.0% to 20.8%.
During the first monitoring round on the 5th March elevated Carbon Monoxide levels were recorded in exploratory holes BH03 and WS03, 46ppm and 30ppm respectively.
For and on behalf of Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
F Hales Engineering Geologist
Project No: TA7329 Document No. F01 BURTON AND SOUTH DERBYSHIRE UTC
15/04/2014 Page 11 of 11
REPORT REFERENCES 1. BGS Sheet 140: 1953, 1:63,360 scale Solid and Drift Edition for Burton upon Trent. British Geological
Survey. 2. BS EN 1997-2: 2007: Eurocode 7 – Geotechnical Design – Part 2: Ground Investigation and Testing. 3. BS 5930: 1999 + A2:2010: Code of Practice for Site Investigation. British Standards Institution 4. BS EN ISO 14688-1: 2002: Geotechnical Investigation and testing – Identification and Classification of
Soil – Part 1: Identification and Description. 5. BS EN ISO 14688-2: 2004 + A1: 2013: Geotechnical Investigation and testing – Identification and
Classification of Soil – Part 2: Principles for a Classification. 6. BS EN ISO 14689-1: 2003: Geotechnical Investigation and testing – Identification and Classification of
Rock – Part 1: Identification and description. 7. BS EN ISO 22476-3: 2005: + A1: 2011 Geotechnical Investigation and Testing – Field Testing – Part 3:
Standard Penetration Test. 8. BS 1377: 1990: Parts 1 to 9: Methods of Test for Soils For Civil Engineering Purposes. British Standards
Institution. 9. BRE Special Digest 1: 2005: Concrete in Aggressive Ground. BRE Construction Division. 10. Rock Characterization Testing and Monitoring - ISRM Suggested Method for Determining Point Load
Strength - 1985. Where any documents referenced above are subject to any amendment, then the latest version incorporating such amendment shall be deemed to apply, unless specifically stated otherwise. For further information about the services provided by Soil Engineering Geoservices Limited, visit our website www.soil-engineering.co.uk
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION AExploratory Hole Records and Field Data
EXPLORATORY HOLE LOG LEGEND AND NOTATION SHEET
section title sheets x25.indd 10 14/03/2013 16:17
SECTION A: EXPLORATORY HOLE LOG LEGENDS
Page 1 of 2 Issue 2.0
CODE DESCRIPTION LEGEND
101 Topsoil
CODE DESCRIPTION LEGEND
806 Coal
104 Concrete
102 Made Ground 807 Breccia
201 Clay
808 Conglomerate
301 Silt
809 Fine Grained Igneous
401 Sand
810 Medium Grained Igneous
501 Gravel
811 Coarse Grained Igneous
601 Peat
812 Fine Grained Metamorphic
701 Cobbles
813 Coarse / Medium Grained Metamorphic
730 Boulders
EVT Evaporite
801 Mudstone
MWS Mine Workings
802 Siltstone
904 Grout
803 Sandstone
905 Arisings
804 Limestone
BLK Zone of No Recovery
805 Chalk
WTR Water
Note: Most soils types comprise a mixture of particle sizes. These soiltypes are represented graphically on the exploratory hole logs bycombining the legends shown on this sheet.
Section A - Legends_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:37 Page 1
SECTION A: EXPLORATORY HOLE LOG LEGENDS
Page 2 of 2 Issue 2.0
SAMPLING NOTATION
U Undisturbed U100 or U38 sample(size given on log)
UT Thin wall open drive tube sampler(size given on log)
P Piston Sample
BLK Block Sample
M Mazier Sample
TW Thin Walled Sample
L Liner Sample obtained from windowless sampler
D Small Disturbed Sample
B Bulk Disturbed Sample
LB Large Bulk Disturbed Sample
C Core Sample
ES Environmental Soil Sample
EW Environmental Water Sample
W Water Sample
UF No Recovery in U Sample
UTF No Recovery in UT Sample
PF No Recovery in P Sample
TWF No Recovery in TW Sample
OTHER NOTATION
TCR Total Core Recovery
SCR Solid Core Recovery
RQD Rock Quality Designation
FI Fracture Index
If Fracture Spacing
NI Non Intact
NA Data Not Applicable
NR Data Not Recorded
GRAPHICS USED
Standing water levelJoining bar indicates level risenWaterstrike level
IN SITU TEST NOTATION
SPT Standard Penetration Test with a Split Spoon
SPT(C) Standard Penetration Test with a Cone
C Cone Penetration Test
NP No Penetration for SPT or SPT(C)
V Vane Test
HV Hand Vane
HP Hand Penetrometer
CBR California Bearing Ratio Test
K Permeability Test(test type not differentiated)
Pr Pressuremeter Test
Section A - Legends_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:37 Page 2
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION AExploratory Hole Records and Field Data
CABLE PERCUSSION AND ROTARY DRILLING RECORDS
section title sheets x25.indd 11 14/03/2013 16:17
9]ZXOP[_S
FZOP[_S
9W‘^S_d[P
9W‘^S]P_‘]Y
$ EPL_TYR MWZb^ ZYWd&
DPXL]V^ 6L^TYR IL_P]OP[_S
6ST^PWWTYR
9Z]X AZ& E<8JC;B?8;7D <^^‘P&DPaT^TZY AZ& )&(- <^^‘P 7L_P **’)(’*()*
8\‘T[XPY_FZ[ 5L^P Fd[P 7L_P E_L]_PO 7L_P 8YOPO 6]Pb EPN_TZY ESZ]TYR ’ DPXL]V^
LWW OTLXP_P]^ TY XTWWTXP_]P^&SL]O ^_]L_L _TXP TY SSXX
8YP]Rd]L_TZ
FZ[ 5L^P 7TLXP_P] FTXP DPNZaP]d!
7KA4@<6 E4@C?<A:
[PYP_]L_TZY TY XX;LXXP]
AZ&
CL]_ ZQ _SP 5LNSd EZWP_LYNSP :]Z‘[
Fd[P DP^[ZY^P eZYPFZ[ 5L^P
CT[P
?ZR E_L_‘^2 9TYLW
9Z] OP_LTW^ ZQ LMM]PaTL_TZY^% ^PP VPd
F4/+*1
*)’(*’*(),,.&)(X B7
5‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 7P]Md^ST]P GF6
5‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 7P]Md^ST]P 6ZWWPRP@Z__ @LN7ZYLWO ?_O
?ZR C]TY_ 7L_P 4YO FTXP2 ).’(,’*(), )(2-(2-(
,*,(,+&-/ 8% +*+,**&*. A AL_TZYLW :]TO*.’(*’*(), HP]_TNLW
5;()
(&(( )&*( <C *)’(*’*(), *)’(*’*(), =7 F8 ;LYO FZZW^)&*( )(&(( 6C *)’(*’*(), *,’(*’*(), =7 F8 7LYOZ *(((
)(&(( *(&-( D6 *-’(*’*(), *.’(*’*(), @@ AE CI9 C67 6ZXLNNSTZ
)-()*)
*(&-(
(&(( (&-( 6ZYN]P_P(&-( )&0( 5PY_ZYT_P)&0( -&*( :]LaPW MLNVQTWW-&*( *(&-( 5PY_ZYT_P
*)’(*’*(), )/(( 1&(( /&(( 8YO ZQ ESTQ_*,’(*’*(), (/+( 1&(( /&(( E_L]_ ZQ ESTQ_*,’(*’*(), )+(( )(&)( /&-( 8YO ZQ 6C*-’(*’*(), (/+( )(&(( )*&(( E_L]_ ZQ ESTQ_*-’(*’*(), )/+( ),&-( )*&(( 8YO ZQ ESTQ_*.’(*’*(), (/+( ),&-( )*&(( E_L]_ ZQ ESTQ_*.’(*’*(), )/+( *(&-( )*&(( 8YO ZQ ;ZWP
(&(( (&)- (/,- ((+( 5]PLVTYR Z‘_1&0( )(&)( (1)- ()(( 6ST^PWWTYR
)(&(( *(&-( IL_P] /( CTYV
()
)(&)(*(&-(
)-()*-
EC
/&-()*&((
)&0( -&*(
,&(()&*(+&*(*&*(*&/(*&.(AD
() (&(( *&(( -( CWLTY() *&(( -&(( -( EWZ__PO
)&-( ECF"6# A30 ")%(%)%*%*%+# 4D+-0 /* )&-( 7DK*&-( ECF"6# A3/ ")%)%*%)%*%*# 4D+-0 /* *&-( *&((+&-( ECF"6# A3)+ "*%+%+%+%+%,# 4D+-0 /* +&-( *&*(,&-( ECF"6# A3*0 "*%+%,%.%0%)(# 4D+-0 /* ,&-( +&*(-&-( ECF"6# A3+- ",%-%0%0%)(%1# 4D+-0 /* -&-( +&,(/&-( ECF A3*+ "*%,%,%.%.%/# 4D+-0 /* /&(( +&0(1&-( ECF"6# -(’*+(XX "-%)(%)*%),%).%0’-# 4D+-0 /* /&(( +&*(
)(&)( ECF"6# -(’**(XX "-%)*%)-%)/%)0’/(# 4D+-0 /* /&-( +&*(
*)’(*’*(), )((( *&(( )&0( )- *&(( AE
C<C8 6BAEFDG6F<BA
<7
OP[_S
SSXX^^
5T_6Z]P 6Z]P
5L]]PW E‘[[Z]_?ZRRPO 5d
7TL&ZQ [T[P
!
DPXL]V^@L_P]TLW^PN_TZY
5L^P ZQ^PN_TZY
FZ[ ZQ546>9<?? 78F4<?E
!7‘]L_TZY
SSXXE_L]_ _TXP
9W‘^SNZWZ‘]
_LVPYQWZb
FZ[ 5L^PFd[P ZQ
[T[P7T^_LYNP
<AEF4??4F<BA 78F4<?E
Q]ZX :&?&<7
C]ZUPN_ AZ&C]ZUPN_ ALXP
8X[WZdP]8YRTYPP]
6ZZ]OTYL_P^:]Z‘YO ?PaPW<YNWTYL_TZY7L_P E_L]_PO 7L_P 6ZX[WP_PO
;ZWP <7&8c[WZ]L_Z]d ;ZWP ?ZR
645?8 C8D6GEE<BA 78F4<?E
;B?8 7<4@8F8D ’ 64E<A:
I4F8D EFD<>8E
DBF4DK 9?GE; 78F4<?E
ECF 78F4<?E
CDB:D8EEDPXL]V^7L_P FTXP ;ZWP
OP[_S OP[_S6L^TYR IL_P]
OP[_S
;L]O E_]L_L 7P[_SQ]ZX _Z
SSXX
;ZWPOTLXP_P]
7P[_S ZQSZWP
6L^TYROTLXP_P]
7P[_S ZQNL^TYR
7L_P FTXP E_]TVP L_OP[_S OP[_S
DT^P _Z FTXP_Z ]T^P
6L^TYR OP[_SL_ ^_]TVP
_TXP_Z ^PLW
7P[_S Fd[P <YN]PXPY_LW MWZb NZ‘Y_ ’
;PLOP]
ABF8E2 4WW OP[_S^ TY XP_]P^%IL_P] ^_]TVP ]T^P _TXP TY XTY‘_P^%
:8A8D4? ABF8E
8P^N]T[_TZY ZQ E_]L_L >PRPYO 8P[_S>PaPW8L_‘X ELX[WTYR
8P_LTW^=Y ET_‘ FP^_ =Y^_LWW’
L_TZY
@AF9E4 5WW OP[_S^ TY XP_]P^& LWW OTLXP_P]^ TY XTWWTXP_]P^(EPP SPLOP] ^SPP_ QZ] OP_LTW^ ZQ MZ]TYR&
<ZWP =8(
8P_LTW^
6WZb 7Z‘Y_ 5YO
B]ZUPN_ @Z(
F7D E7D DC8
9X[WZdP]9YRTYPP]
7ZZ]OTYL_P^;]Z‘YO >PaPW
9c[WZ]L_Z]d <ZWP >ZRB]ZUPN_ @LXP
<ZWP Fd[P =YNWTYL_TZY
:Z]X @Z( E=9JB<A>9>A; =^^‘P(DPaT^TZY @Z( +(*/ =^^‘P 8L_P ,,)+*),*+, BL]_ ZQ _SP 6LNSd EZWP_LYNSP ;]Z‘[
ELX[WP DPNZaP]d
:Z] OP_LTW^ ZQ LMM]PaTL_TZY^& ^PP VPd[]ZR]P^^ LYO bL_P](
8TL(
>ZR E_L_‘^4 :TYLW
=B%7B%D7
F51-,3
.0(+*X A8
6‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 8P]Md^ST]P GF7
6‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 8P]Md^ST]P 7ZWWPRP?Z__ ?LN8ZYLWO >_O
>ZR B]TY_ 8L_P 5YO FTXP4 +0)*.),*+. +*4/*4//
.,.*.-(/1 9& -,-.,,(,0 @ @L_TZYLW ;]TOHP]_TNLW
=:
6<*+
*(*/*(+/
+(,*
,(**
0(+*
3(**
.0(*/
./(3/
..(3*
..(+*
.*(**
-1(+*
9E**+
9E**,8**-
9E**.6**/
8**06**1
9E**2I**3
8*+*6*++
8*+,6*+-
8*+.6*+/
8*+06*+1
8*+2G*+3
8*,*
8*,+6*,,
8*,-G*,.
8*,/
*(,*
*(/**(/*
+(**+(**’+(/*
+(/*+(/*’,(**
,(**,(**
,(/*,(/*’-(**
-(/*-(/*’.(**
.(/*
.(/*’/(**
/(/*/(/*’0(**
0(/*0(/*’0(3/
1(**
1(/*’1(3/1(/*’2(**
2(/*2(/*’2(1*
3(**
+**
+**
#/*$ +**!
#1*$ +**!
EBF#7$2+(/*
EBF#7$1,(/*
EBF#7$+--(/*
EBF#7$,2.(/*
EBF#7$-//(/*
EBF,-1(/*
EBF#7$/*),-*XX3(/*
+(3/
,(3/
-(3/
.(3/
/(3/
1(3/
3(22
?589 ;DAG@84 FL]XLNLOLX(
?589 ;DAG@84 7ZYN]P_P(
?589 ;DAG@84 6WLNV ^WTRS_Wd NWLdPd R]LaPWWd QTYP _Z NZL]^P^LYO ^TePO Q]LRXPY_^ bT_S WZb NZMMWP NZY_PY_( ;]LaPW ^TePOQ]LRXPY_^ L]P LYR‘WL] _Z ^‘MLYR‘WL] QTYP _Z NZL]^P ZQ NWTYVP]&L^S LYO M]TNV( 7ZMMWP ^TePO Q]LRXPY_^ L]P LYR‘WL] ZQ M]TNV(
>ZZ^P M]ZbY NWLdPd QTYP _Z NZL]^P E5@8 LYO ^‘MLYR‘WL] _Z]Z‘YOPO QTYP _Z NZL]^P ;D5H9> ZQ XTcPO WT_SZWZRTP^& bT_S WZbNZMMWP NZY_PY_( 7ZMMWP^ L]P ^‘MLYR‘WL] _Z ^‘M]Z‘YOPO ZQ XTcPOWT_SZWZRTP^(
>ZZ^P M]ZbY ^WTRS_Wd NWLdPd QTYP _Z NZL]^P E5@8 LYO ^‘MLYR‘WL]QTYP _Z NZL]^P ;D5H9> ZQ XTcPO WT_SZWZRTP^ bT_S WZb NZMMWPNZY_PY_( 7ZMMWP^ L]P ^‘MLYR‘WL] _Z ]Z‘YOPO ZQ XTcPOWT_SZWZRTP^(
L_ -(/*X MPNZXTYR XPOT‘X OPY^P ^WTRS_Wd NWLdPd aP]dR]LaPWWd QTYP _Z NZL]^P ^LYO
Q]ZX /(/*X MPNZXTYR OPY^P
:T]X STRS ^_]PYR_S ]POOT^S M]ZbY XZ__WPO WTRS_ R]Pd Q]TLMWP^WTRS_Wd R]LaPWWd 7>5K( ;]LaPW T^ LYR‘WL] _Z ^‘MLYR‘WL] QTYP_Z NZL]^P ZQ X‘O^_ZYP( #<TRSWd IPL_SP]PO ?P]NTL ?‘O^_ZYP$
HP]d bPLV ]POOT^S M]ZbY XZ__WPO WTRS_ R]Pd ?G8EFA@9( DPNZaP]POL^ ^LYOd LYR‘WL] _Z ^‘MLYR‘WL] QTYP _Z NZL]^P R]LaPW(
ESPP_ + ZQ -
Q]ZX +*(1/X _Z ++(**X L^^‘XPO eZYP ZQ NZ]P WZ^^
5^^‘XPO eZYP ZQ NZ]P WZ^^( #>ZNLWWd bPL_SP]PO XP]NTL?G8EFA@9$( #8]TWWP]"^ OP^N]T[_TZY$
IPLV ]POOT^S M]ZbY XZ__WPO R]PPYT^S R]Pd ?G8EFA@9 bT_SPc_]PXPWd NWZ^PWd ^[LNPO _Z aP]d NWZ^PWd ^[LNPO Rd[^‘X aPTY^(8T^NZY_TY‘T_TP^4 +$ *’,* OPR]PP^ NWZ^PWd ^[LNPO _Z XPOT‘X^[LNPO ]Z‘RS ‘YO‘WL_TYR bT_S aP]d NWZ^PWd ^[LNPO _Z XPOT‘X^[LNPO ]PO ZcTOL_TZY LYO R]Pd ]PO‘N_TZY ^_LTYTYR(
Q]ZX +,(**X _Z +,(,.X ]PNZaP]PO L^ YZY TY_LN_ NZ]P#^WTRS_Wd NWLdPd ^WTRS_Wd ^LYOd LYR‘WL] _Z ^‘MLYR‘WL] QTYP_Z NZL]^P R]LaPW ^TePO Q]LRXPY_^$Q]ZX +,(,.X _Z +,(/*X L^^‘XPO eZYP ZQ NZ]P WZ^^Q]ZX +,(//X _Z +,(2*X ]PNZaP]PO L^ YZY TY_LN_ NZ]P#^WTRS_Wd NWLdPd ^WTRS_Wd ^LYOd LYR‘WL] _Z ^‘MLYR‘WL] QTYP_Z NZL]^P R]LaPW ^TePO Q]LRXPY_^$Q]ZX +-(**X _Z +-(+1X ]PNZaP]PO L^ YZY TY_LN_ NZ]P#^WTRS_Wd NWLdPd ^WTRS_Wd ^LYOd LYR‘WL] _Z ^‘MLYR‘WL] QTYP_Z NZL]^P R]LaPW ^TePO Q]LRXPY_^$Q]ZX +-(/*X _Z +-(01X R]PdQ]ZX +-(33X _Z +.(*2X ]PNZaP]PO L^ YZY TY_LN_ NZ]P#^WTRS_Wd NWLdPd ^WTRS_Wd ^LYOd LYR‘WL] _Z ^‘MLYR‘WL] QTYP_Z NZL]^P R]LaPW ^TePO Q]LRXPY_^$Q]ZX +.(/*X _Z +.(0/X LYO +.(3,X _Z +.(33X ]PNZaP]PO L^ YZYTY_LN_ NZ]P #^WTRS_Wd NWLdPd ^WTRS_Wd ^LYOd LYR‘WL] _Z^‘MLYR‘WL] QTYP _Z NZL]^P R]LaPW ^TePO Q]LRXPY_^$Q]ZX +/(+*X _Z +/(,2X LYO +/(.*X _Z +/(.1X ]PNZaP]PO L^ YZYTY_LN_ NZ]P #LYR‘WL] _Z ^‘MLYR‘WL] QTYP _Z NZL]^P R]LaPW^TePO Q]LRXPY_^$
Q]ZX +/(2/X _Z +0(**X ]PNZaP]PO L^ YZY TY_LN_ NZ]P#^WTRS_Wd NWLdPd ^WTRS_Wd ^LYOd LYR‘WL] _Z ^‘MLYR‘WL] QTYP_Z NZL]^P R]LaPW ^TePO Q]LRXPY_^$
Q]ZX +0(//X _Z +0(0/X ]PNZaP]PO L^ YZY TY_LN_ NZ]P#^WTRS_Wd NWLdPd ^WTRS_Wd ^LYOd LYR‘WL] _Z ^‘MLYR‘WL] QTYP_Z NZL]^P R]LaPW ^TePO Q]LRXPY_^$
Q]ZX +1(*/X _Z +1(+/X ]PNZaP]PO L^ YZY TY_LN_ NZ]P #LYR‘WL]_Z ^‘MLYR‘WL] QTYP _Z NZL]^P R]LaPW ^TePO Q]LRXPY_^$Q]ZX +1(-/X _Z +1(/*X L^^‘XPO eZYP ZQ NZ]P WZ^^
ESPP_ , ZQ -
8P^N]T[_TZY ZQ E_]L_L >PRPYO 8P[_S>PaPW8L_‘X ELX[WTYR
8P_LTW^=Y ET_‘ FP^_ =Y^_LWW’
L_TZY
@AF9E4 5WW OP[_S^ TY XP_]P^& LWW OTLXP_P]^ TY XTWWTXP_]P^(EPP SPLOP] ^SPP_ QZ] OP_LTW^ ZQ MZ]TYR&
<ZWP =8(
8P_LTW^
6WZb 7Z‘Y_ 5YO
B]ZUPN_ @Z(
F7D E7D DC8
9X[WZdP]9YRTYPP]
7ZZ]OTYL_P^;]Z‘YO >PaPW
9c[WZ]L_Z]d <ZWP >ZRB]ZUPN_ @LXP
<ZWP Fd[P =YNWTYL_TZY
:Z]X @Z( E=9JB<A>9>A; =^^‘P(DPaT^TZY @Z( +(*/ =^^‘P 8L_P ,,)+*),*+, BL]_ ZQ _SP 6LNSd EZWP_LYNSP ;]Z‘[
ELX[WP DPNZaP]d
:Z] OP_LTW^ ZQ LMM]PaTL_TZY^& ^PP VPd[]ZR]P^^ LYO bL_P](
8TL(
>ZR E_L_‘^4 :TYLW
=B%7B%D7
F51-,3
.0(+*X A8
6‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 8P]Md^ST]P GF7
6‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 8P]Md^ST]P 7ZWWPRP?Z__ ?LN8ZYLWO >_O
>ZR B]TY_ 8L_P 5YO FTXP4 +0)*.),*+. +*4/*4/2
.,.*.-(/1 9& -,-.,,(,0 @ @L_TZYLW ;]TOHP]_TNLW
=:
6<*+
+*(**
++(03
+,(**
-0(+*
-.(.+
-.(+*
+*(**
++(**
+,(**
+,(/*
+-(**
+-(-*
+.(/*
+0(**
+1(/*
+3(**
++(**
+,(**
+,(/*
+-(**
+-(-*
+.(/*
+0(**
+1(/*
+3(**
,*(/*
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
1.
03
.2
+**
+**
20
+**
3*
31
3*
*
*
*
0,
.-
1-
00
0/
3-
2-
*
*
*
,*
.-
--
-3
+0
01
/2
@=@=
@5
@=@=
@=1*
@=+/*
@=
@=
,+*
,-*
EBF#7$/*),,*XX+*(+* +*(.1
9c_]PXPWd bPLV ]POOT^S M]ZbY XZ__WPO R]PPYT^S R]Pd ?G8EFA@9bT_S Pc_]PXPWd NWZ^PWd ^[LNPO _Z aP]d NWZ^PWd ^[LNPO \‘L]_eLYO Rd[^‘X aPTY^( DPNZaP]PO L^ YZY TY_LN_ NZ]P #^WTRS_WdNWLdPd ^WTRS_Wd R]LaPWWd QTYP _Z NZL]^P ^LYO ^TePO Q]LRXPY_^(;]LaPW T^ QTYP _Z XPOT‘X$(
8P^N]T[_TZY ZQ E_]L_L >PRPYO 8P[_S>PaPW8L_‘X ELX[WTYR
8P_LTW^=Y ET_‘ FP^_ =Y^_LWW’
L_TZY
@AF9E4 5WW OP[_S^ TY XP_]P^& LWW OTLXP_P]^ TY XTWWTXP_]P^(EPP SPLOP] ^SPP_ QZ] OP_LTW^ ZQ MZ]TYR&
<ZWP =8(
8P_LTW^
6WZb 7Z‘Y_ 5YO
B]ZUPN_ @Z(
F7D E7D DC8
9X[WZdP]9YRTYPP]
7ZZ]OTYL_P^;]Z‘YO >PaPW
9c[WZ]L_Z]d <ZWP >ZRB]ZUPN_ @LXP
<ZWP Fd[P =YNWTYL_TZY
:Z]X @Z( E=9JB<A>9>A; =^^‘P(DPaT^TZY @Z( +(*/ =^^‘P 8L_P ,,)+*),*+, BL]_ ZQ _SP 6LNSd EZWP_LYNSP ;]Z‘[
ELX[WP DPNZaP]d
:Z] OP_LTW^ ZQ LMM]PaTL_TZY^& ^PP VPd[]ZR]P^^ LYO bL_P](
8TL(
>ZR E_L_‘^4 :TYLW
=B%7B%D7
F51-,3
.0(+*X A8
6‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 8P]Md^ST]P GF7
6‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 8P]Md^ST]P 7ZWWPRP?Z__ ?LN8ZYLWO >_O
>ZR B]TY_ 8L_P 5YO FTXP4 +0)*.),*+. +*4/+4*,
.,.*.-(/1 9& -,-.,,(,0 @ @L_TZYLW ;]TOHP]_TNLW
=:
6<*+
,*(/* ,/(0*
IPLV ]POOT^S M]ZbY XZ__WPO R]PPYT^S R]Pd ?G8EFA@9 bT_SPc_]PXPWd NWZ^PWd ^[LNPO _Z aP]d NWZ^PWd ^[LNPO Rd[^‘X aPTY^(8T^NZY_TY‘T_TP^4 +$ *’,* OPR]PP^ NWZ^PWd ^[LNPO _Z XPOT‘X^[LNPO ]Z‘RS ‘YO‘WL_TYR bT_S aP]d NWZ^PWd ^[LNPO _Z XPOT‘X^[LNPO ]PO ZcTOL_TZY LYO R]Pd ]PO‘N_TZY ^_LTYTYR(
Q]ZX ,*(-/X _Z ,*(/*X L^^‘XPO eZYP ZQ NZ]P WZ^^9c[WZ]L_Z]d SZWP NZX[WP_P L_ ,*(/* X(
ESPP_ - ZQ -
9]ZXOP[_S
FZOP[_S
9W‘^S_d[P
9W‘^S]P_‘]Y
$ EPL_TYR MWZb^ ZYWd&
DPXL]V^ 6L^TYR IL_P]OP[_S
6ST^PWWTYR
9Z]X AZ& E<8JC;B?8;7D <^^‘P&DPaT^TZY AZ& )&(- <^^‘P 7L_P **’)(’*()*
8\‘T[XPY_FZ[ 5L^P Fd[P 7L_P E_L]_PO 7L_P 8YOPO 6]Pb EPN_TZY ESZ]TYR ’ DPXL]V^
LWW OTLXP_P]^ TY XTWWTXP_]P^&SL]O ^_]L_L _TXP TY SSXX
8YP]Rd]L_TZ
FZ[ 5L^P 7TLXP_P] FTXP DPNZaP]d!
7KA4@<6 E4@C?<A:
[PYP_]L_TZY TY XX;LXXP]
AZ&
CL]_ ZQ _SP 5LNSd EZWP_LYNSP :]Z‘[
Fd[P DP^[ZY^P eZYPFZ[ 5L^P
CT[P
?ZR E_L_‘^2 9TYLW
9Z] OP_LTW^ ZQ LMM]PaTL_TZY^% ^PP VPd
F4/+*1
)0’(*’*(),,.&(0X B7
5‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 7P]Md^ST]P GF6
5‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 7P]Md^ST]P 6ZWWPRP@Z__ @LN7ZYLWO ?_O
?ZR C]TY_ 7L_P 4YO FTXP2 ).’(,’*(), )(2-)2),
,*,(/(&/( 8% +*+,/0&*( A AL_TZYLW :]TO*(’(*’*(), HP]_TNLW
5;(*
(&(( )&*( <C )0’(*’*(), )0’(*’*(), =7 F8 ;LYO FZZW^)&*( )(&,( 6C )0’(*’*(), )1’(*’*(), =7 F8 7LYOZ +(((
)(&,( *(&-( D6 )1’(*’*(), *(’(*’*(), @@ =? CI9 C67 6ZXLNNSTZ
)-()*)
.&*(
(&(( (&)( 5T_‘XTYZ‘^ XL_P]TLW(&)( (&+( 6ZYN]P_P(&+( )&0( 5PY_ZYT_P)&0( .&-( :]LaPW MLNVQTWW.&-( *(&-( 5PY_ZYT_P
)0’(*’*(), )/+( 0&1- /&-( 8YO ZQ ESTQ_)1’(*’*(), (/+( 0&1- /&-( E_L]_ ZQ ESTQ_)1’(*’*(), )*(( )(&,( /&-( 8YO ZQ 6C)1’(*’*(), )++( )(&,( )(&(( E_L]_ ZQ DZ_L]d)1’(*’*(), )/+( )+&(( )(&(( 8YO ZQ ESTQ_*(’(*’*(), (/+( )+&(( )(&(( E_L]_ ZQ ESTQ_*(’(*’*(), )/(- *(&-( )(&(( 8YO ZQ ;ZWP
(&(( (&*( (1,- ((*- 5]PLVTYR Z‘_)(&(( )(&,( (0+( ()(( 6ST^PWWTYR
)(&-( ))&(( IL_P] )(( DPO))&(( ),&-( IL_P] 1( DPO),&-( ).&(( IL_P] 1( CTYV).&(( *(&-( IL_P] 0( CTYV
()
)(&,(*(&-(
)-()*)
EC
/&-()(&((
)&0( .&-(
,&,(,&,(+&0((&,((&*((&,(*&*(
() (&(( *&(( -( CWLTY() *&(( .&*( -( EWZ__PO
)&-( ECF A3*( "+%,%,%-%-%.# 4D+-0 /* )&-( 7DK*&-( ECF"6# A3** "+%,%-%-%.%.# 4D+-0 /* *&-( 7DK+&-( ECF"6# A3*( "*%+%,%-%-%.# 4D+-0 /* +&-( 7DK,&-( ECF"6# A3*/ "*%,%.%/%/%/# 4D+-0 /* ,&-( +&((-&-( ECF"6# A3,, "*%,%0%)(%)*%),# 4D+-0 /* -&-( +&*(/&-( ECF A3*/ "*%,%-%/%/%0# 4D+-0 /* /&-( ,&*(0&-( ECF A3*. "*%,%.%/%-%0# 4D+-0 /* /&-( ,&,(1&-( ECF -(’*1(XX ".%)*%)*%)*%)-%))’.-# 4D+-0 /* /&-( +&,(
)(&(( ECF -(’**(XX "0%)*%)-%)0%)/’/(# 4D+-0 /* /&-( +&0(
)0’(*’*(), )+)- ,&(( +&(( )- ,&(( AE
C<C8 6BAEFDG6F<BA
<7
OP[_S
SSXX^^
5T_6Z]P 6Z]P
5L]]PW E‘[[Z]_?ZRRPO 5d
7TL&ZQ [T[P
!
DPXL]V^@L_P]TLW^PN_TZY
5L^P ZQ^PN_TZY
FZ[ ZQ546>9<?? 78F4<?E
!7‘]L_TZY
SSXXE_L]_ _TXP
9W‘^SNZWZ‘]
_LVPYQWZb
FZ[ 5L^PFd[P ZQ
[T[P7T^_LYNP
<AEF4??4F<BA 78F4<?E
Q]ZX :&?&<7
C]ZUPN_ AZ&C]ZUPN_ ALXP
8X[WZdP]8YRTYPP]
6ZZ]OTYL_P^:]Z‘YO ?PaPW<YNWTYL_TZY7L_P E_L]_PO 7L_P 6ZX[WP_PO
;ZWP <7&8c[WZ]L_Z]d ;ZWP ?ZR
645?8 C8D6GEE<BA 78F4<?E
;B?8 7<4@8F8D ’ 64E<A:
I4F8D EFD<>8E
DBF4DK 9?GE; 78F4<?E
ECF 78F4<?E
CDB:D8EEDPXL]V^7L_P FTXP ;ZWP
OP[_S OP[_S6L^TYR IL_P]
OP[_S
;L]O E_]L_L 7P[_SQ]ZX _Z
SSXX
;ZWPOTLXP_P]
7P[_S ZQSZWP
6L^TYROTLXP_P]
7P[_S ZQNL^TYR
7L_P FTXP E_]TVP L_OP[_S OP[_S
DT^P _Z FTXP_Z ]T^P
6L^TYR OP[_SL_ ^_]TVP
_TXP_Z ^PLW
7P[_S Fd[P <YN]PXPY_LW MWZb NZ‘Y_ ’
;PLOP]
ABF8E2 4WW OP[_S^ TY XP_]P^%IL_P] ^_]TVP ]T^P _TXP TY XTY‘_P^%
:8A8D4? ABF8E
7O\M[SZ]SYX YP D][K]K =OQOXN 7OZ]R=O_OV7K]^W DKWZVSXQ
7O]KSV\<X DS]^ EO\] <X\]KVV&
K]SYX
?@E8D3 4VV NOZ]R\ SX WO][O\% KVV NSKWO]O[\ SX WSVVSWO][O\’DOO ROKNO[ \ROO] PY[ NO]KSV\ YP LY[SXQ%
;YVO <7’
7O]KSV\
5VY‘ 6Y^X] 4XN
A[YTOM] ?Y’
E6C D6C CB7
8WZVYbO[8XQSXOO[
6YY[NSXK]O\:[Y^XN =O_OV
8aZVY[K]Y[b ;YVO =YQA[YTOM] ?KWO
;YVO EbZO <XMVSXK]SYX
9Y[W ?Y’ D<8IA;@=8=@: <\\^O’CO_S\SYX ?Y’ *’). <\\^O 7K]O ++(*)(+)*+ AK[] YP ]RO 5KMRb DYVO]KXMRO :[Y^Z
DKWZVO COMY_O[b
9Y[ NO]KSV\ YP KLL[O_SK]SYX\% \OO UObZ[YQ[O\\ KXN ‘K]O[’
7SK’
=YQ D]K]^\3 9SXKV
<A$6A$C6
E40,+2
-/’)1W @7
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O FE6
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O 6YVVOQO>Y]] >KM7YXKVN =]N
=YQ A[SX] 7K]O 4XN ESWO3 */()-(+)*- *)3.*3*2
-+-)0)’0) 8% ,+,-01’+) ? ?K]SYXKV :[SNGO[]SMKV
<9
5;)+
)’*)
)’1)
*’-)
/’,)
2’.)
-.’21
-.’+1
--’/1
,2’01
,/’.1
8D))*
7))+8D)),
7))-8D)).5))/
7))05))1
8D))2
7)*)5)**
7)*+5)*,
H)*-
7)*.5)*/
7)*05)*1
7)*2F)+)
7)+*
7)++5)+,
7)+-
7)+.5)+/
)’+)
)’.))’.)
*’))*’))*’))
*’.)&*’2.*’.)&+’))
+’))
+’.)+’.)&,’))
,’.),’.)&-’))
-’))
-’.)-’.)&.’))
.’.)
.’.)&/’))
/’.)/’.)&/’2.
0’))
0’.)&0’2.0’.)&1’))
1’.)&1’2.
2’.)2’.)
*)) "0)# *))!
DAE+)*’.)
DAE"6#+++’.)
DAE"6#+),’.)
DAE"6#+0-’.)
DAE"6#--.’.)
DAE+00’.)
DAE+/1’.)
DAE.)(+2)WW2’.)
*’2.
+’2.
,’2.
-’2.
.’2.
0’2.
1’2.
2’2-
>478 :C@F?73 EK[WKMKNKW’
>478 :C@F?73 5VKMU PSXO ]Y MYK[\O \KXN \ScON P[KQWOX]\ KXNKXQ^VK[ ]Y \^LKXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV \ScON P[KQWOX]\ YPL[SMU% K\R KXN MVSXUO[’
P[YW )’,)W ]Y )’-)W ‘S]R VY‘ MYLLVO MYX]OX]’ 6YLLVO \ScONP[KQWOX]\ K[O KXQ^VK[ YP L[SMUP[YW )’-)W LOMYWSXQ MVKbOb
=SQR] L[Y‘X MVKbOb _O[b Q[K_OVVb PSXO ]Y MYK[\O D4?7’ :[K_OVS\ \^L[Y^XNON ]Y [Y^XNON PSXO ]Y MYK[\O YP WSaON VS]RYVYQSO\’"AY\\SLVO >KNO :[Y^XN#
>ONS^W NOX\O MVKbOb _O[b \KXNb \^L[Y^XNON ]Y [Y^XNON MYK[\O:C4G8= YP WSaON VS]RYVYQSO\% ‘S]R VY‘ MYLLVO MYX]OX]’ DKXN S\PSXO ]Y MYK[\O’ 6YLLVO\ K[O \^L[Y^XNON ]Y [Y^XNON YP WSaONVS]RYVYQSO\’
K] +’.)W MVKbOb _O[b \KXNb \^L[Y^XNON ]Y [Y^XNON PSXO ]YMYK[\O Q[K_OV
P[YW ,’.)W LOMYWSXQ [ONNS\R L[Y‘X
P[YW .’.)W \VSQR]Vb MVKbOb
9S[W RSQR \][OXQ]R [ONNS\R L[Y‘X \VSQR]Vb Q[K_OVVb 6=4J’:[K_OV S\ KXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O YP W^N\]YXO’ ";SQRVbHOK]RO[ON >O[MSK >^N\]YXO#
P[YW 0’.)W LOMYWSXQ [ONNS\R L[Y‘X WY]]VON VSQR] Q[Ob
GO[b ‘OKU [ONNS\R L[Y‘X WY]]VON Q[Ob >F7DE@?8’ COMY_O[ON K\\VSQR]Vb \KXNb KXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y WONS^W VYMKVVb MYK[\O Q[K_OV’
DROO] * YP ,
\VSQR]Vb \KXNb KXQ^VK[ ]Y \^LKXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV‘S]R VY‘ MYLLVO MYX]OX]’ DKXN S\ WONS^W ]Y MYK[\O’ 6YLLVO\K[O \^LKXQ^VK[#P[YW *,’))W ]Y *,’.)W [OMY_O[ON K\ XYX SX]KM] MY[O "MVKbOb\KXNb KXQ^VK[ ]Y \^LKXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV’ DKXN S\PSXO ]Y MYK[\O#P[YW *,’.)W ]Y *,’/.W [OMY_O[ON K\ XYX SX]KM] MY[O "LV^S\RQ[Ob \VSQR]Vb MVKbOb \VSQR]Vb \KXNb KXQ^VK[ ]Y \^LKXQ^VK[PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV#P[YW *,’/.W ]Y *,’1*W * ?Y ]RSX LON YP _O[b ‘OKU LV^S\RQ[Ob W^N\]YXO ‘S]R _O[b MVY\OVb \ZKMON )&*) NOQ[OO\ MKVMS]O_OSX\ "*&,WW#P[YW *,’2)W ]Y *,’22W [OMY_O[ON K\ XYX SX]KM] MY[O "KXQ^VK[]Y \^LKXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV#P[YW *-’),W ]Y *-’).W * ?Y ]RSMU VKWSXK]SYX YP LV^S\R Q[ObMVKbP[YW *-’,.W ]Y *-’-,W * ?Y -)&.) NOQ[OO\ NS\MYX]SX^S]bZVKXK[ \WYY]RP[YW *-’.)W ]Y *-’1,W [OMY_O[ON K\ XYX SX]KM] MY[O"\^LKXQ^VK[ MYLLVO\ YP W^N\]YXO#P[YW *-’1,W ]Y *-’22W KXN *.’).W ]Y *.’*.W [OMY_O[ON K\ XYXSX]KM] MY[O "KXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV#
HOKU VSQR] Q[Ob ]Y Q[Ob D<=EDE@?8 ‘S]R _O[b MVY\OVb \ZKMON)&*) NOQ[OO\ QbZ\^W _OSX\ "*&+WW ]RSMU#’ 7S\MYX]SX^S]SO\3 *#)&*) NOQ[OO\ _O[b MVY\OVb ]Y MVY\OVb \ZKMON ZVKXK[ \WYY]R’
GO[b ‘OKU ]Y ‘OKU [ONNS\R L[Y‘X >F7DE@?8 ‘S]R _O[b MVY\OVb ]YMVY\OVb \ZKMON )&*) NOQ[OO\ QbZ\^W _OSX\’ 7S\MYX]SX^S]SO\3 *#)&*) NOQ[OO\ _O[b MVY\OVb ]Y MVY\OVb \ZKMON ZVKXK[ \WYY]R’
P[YW */’))W ]Y */’*/W [OMY_O[ON K\ XYX SX]KM] MY[O"\VSQR]Vb \KXNb KXQ^VK[ ]Y \^LKXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\OQ[K_OV’ DKXN S\ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O#P[YW */’,1W ]Y */’-+W KXN */’-2W ]Y */’0.W [OMY_O[ON K\ XYXSX]KM] MY[O "\VSQR]Vb \KXNb KXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV’DKXN S\ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O#P[YW */’1+W ]Y */’10W [OMY_O[ON K\ XYX SX]KM] MY[O"\VSQR]Vb \KXNb KXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV’ DKXN S\ PSXO]Y MYK[\O#P[YW *0’+*W ]Y *0’+1W LV^S\R Q[Ob’ COMY_O[ON K\ XYX SX]KM]MY[O "KXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV#P[YW *0’+1W ]Y *0’-,W ‘S]R Oa][OWOVb MVY\OVb \ZKMONNS\MYX]SX^S]SO\ YP )&*) NOQ[OO\% -)&.) NOQ[OO\ KXN 1)&2)NOQ[OO\ ZVKXK[ [Y^QRP[YW *0’-,W ]Y *0’/)W [OMY_O[ON K\ XYX SX]KM] MY[O"\VSQR]Vb \KXNb KXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV’ DKXN S\ PSXO]Y MYK[\O#
DROO] + YP ,
7O\M[SZ]SYX YP D][K]K =OQOXN 7OZ]R=O_OV7K]^W DKWZVSXQ
7O]KSV\<X DS]^ EO\] <X\]KVV&
K]SYX
?@E8D3 4VV NOZ]R\ SX WO][O\% KVV NSKWO]O[\ SX WSVVSWO][O\’DOO ROKNO[ \ROO] PY[ NO]KSV\ YP LY[SXQ%
;YVO <7’
7O]KSV\
5VY‘ 6Y^X] 4XN
A[YTOM] ?Y’
E6C D6C CB7
8WZVYbO[8XQSXOO[
6YY[NSXK]O\:[Y^XN =O_OV
8aZVY[K]Y[b ;YVO =YQA[YTOM] ?KWO
;YVO EbZO <XMVSXK]SYX
9Y[W ?Y’ D<8IA;@=8=@: <\\^O’CO_S\SYX ?Y’ *’). <\\^O 7K]O ++(*)(+)*+ AK[] YP ]RO 5KMRb DYVO]KXMRO :[Y^Z
DKWZVO COMY_O[b
9Y[ NO]KSV\ YP KLL[O_SK]SYX\% \OO UObZ[YQ[O\\ KXN ‘K]O[’
7SK’
=YQ D]K]^\3 9SXKV
<A$6A$C6
E40,+2
-/’)1W @7
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O FE6
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O 6YVVOQO>Y]] >KM7YXKVN =]N
=YQ A[SX] 7K]O 4XN ESWO3 */()-(+)*- *)3.*3+-
-+-)0)’0) 8% ,+,-01’+) ? ?K]SYXKV :[SNGO[]SMKV
<9
5;)+
*)’-)
**’))
*.’,)
*/’))
,.’/1
,.’)1
,)’01
,)’)1
7)+0
*)’-)
**’))
**’.)
*+’))
*,’))
*-’.)
*/’))
*0’.)
*2’))
*)’))
**’))
**’.)
*+’))
*,’))
*-’.)
*/’))
*0’.)
*2’))
+)’.)
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
01
11
0+
*))
2.
1.
2/
*))
20
-
1
,)
+,
,1
,,
,1
,,
00
)
)
)
*)
2
2
*2
2
,,
?<,)
?</)
*))
*.)
DAE.)(++)WW*)’)) *)’,0GO[b ‘OKU [ONNS\R L[Y‘X WY]]VON Q[Ob >F7DE@?8’ COMY_O[ON K\
\VSQR]Vb \KXNb KXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y WONS^W VYMKVVb MYK[\O Q[K_OV’
COMY_O[ON K\ XYX SX]KM] MY[O "NK[U L[Y‘X _O[b KXQ^VK[ PSXO:C4G8= \ScON P[KQWOX]\ YP W^N\]YXO#’
P[YW *)’1*W ]Y *)’1,W SX]KM] MY[O*)’1/W ]Y *)’2-W KXN **’))W ]Y **’*+W [OMY_O[ON K\ XYXSX]KM] MY[O "PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV ‘S]R VY‘ KXQ^VK[ MYLLVOMYX]OX]#P[YW *)’1/W ]Y **’))W K\\^WON cYXO YP MY[O VY\\P[YW *)’2-W ]Y **’))W LV^S\R Q[Ob
GO[b ‘OKU [ONNS\R L[Y‘X >F7DE@?8 ‘S]R _O[b MVY\OVb VYMKVVbMVY\OVb \ZKMON )&*) NOQ[OO\ QbZ\^W _OSX\ "+&*.WW ]RSMU#’7S\MYX]SX^S]SO\3 *# )&*) NOQ[OO\ Oa][OWOVb MVY\OVb ]Y _O[bMVY\OVb \ZKMON VYMKVVb MVY\OVb \ZKMON ZVKXK[ \WYY]R’
P[YW **’*+W ]Y **’*/W LV^S\R Q[ObP[YW **’*/W ]Y **’,+W KXN **’,.W ]Y **’/.W [OMY_O[ON K\ XYXSX]KM] MY[O "MVKbOb KXQ^VK[ ]Y \^LKXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\OQ[K_OV ‘S]R VY‘ MYLLVO MYX]OX]#P[YW *+’))W ]Y *+’/)W% *+’00W ]Y *+’1.W KXN *+’2+W ]Y*+’2/W [OMY_O[ON K\ XYX SX]KM] MY[O "\VSQR]Vb MVKbOb
7O\M[SZ]SYX YP D][K]K =OQOXN 7OZ]R=O_OV7K]^W DKWZVSXQ
7O]KSV\<X DS]^ EO\] <X\]KVV&
K]SYX
?@E8D3 4VV NOZ]R\ SX WO][O\% KVV NSKWO]O[\ SX WSVVSWO][O\’DOO ROKNO[ \ROO] PY[ NO]KSV\ YP LY[SXQ%
;YVO <7’
7O]KSV\
5VY‘ 6Y^X] 4XN
A[YTOM] ?Y’
E6C D6C CB7
8WZVYbO[8XQSXOO[
6YY[NSXK]O\:[Y^XN =O_OV
8aZVY[K]Y[b ;YVO =YQA[YTOM] ?KWO
;YVO EbZO <XMVSXK]SYX
9Y[W ?Y’ D<8IA;@=8=@: <\\^O’CO_S\SYX ?Y’ *’). <\\^O 7K]O ++(*)(+)*+ AK[] YP ]RO 5KMRb DYVO]KXMRO :[Y^Z
DKWZVO COMY_O[b
9Y[ NO]KSV\ YP KLL[O_SK]SYX\% \OO UObZ[YQ[O\\ KXN ‘K]O[’
7SK’
=YQ D]K]^\3 9SXKV
<A$6A$C6
E40,+2
-/’)1W @7
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O FE6
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O 6YVVOQO>Y]] >KM7YXKVN =]N
=YQ A[SX] 7K]O 4XN ESWO3 */()-(+)*- *)3.*3,*
-+-)0)’0) 8% ,+,-01’+) ? ?K]SYXKV :[SNGO[]SMKV
<9
5;)+
+)’.) +.’.1
COWKSXSXQ 7O]KSV 3 *0’/)W & *1’.+W 3 P[YW *0’/)W ]Y *1’.+W‘S]R 1)&2) NOQ[OO\ _O[b MVY\OVb \ZKMON NS\MYX]SX^S]SO\ ZVKXK[\WYY]R
7O]KSV *1’)/W & *1’*+W 3 P[YW *1’)/W ]Y *1’*+W KXN *1’,2W]Y *1’-.W + ?Y -)&.) NOQ[OO\ WONS^W LONNON NS\MYX]SX^S]SO\ZVKXK[ \WYY]R7O]KSV *1’/,W & *1’/2W 3 P[YW *1’/,W ]Y *1’/2W [OMY_O[ON K\XYX SX]KM] MY[O "\VSQR]Vb \KXNb KXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\OQ[K_OV’ DKXN S\ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O#7O]KSV *1’0.W & *1’1-W 3 P[YW *1’0.W ]Y *1’1-W [OMY_O[ON K\XYX SX]KM] MY[O "\VSQR]Vb \KXNb KXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\OQ[K_OV’ DKXN S\ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O#7O]KSV *2’+)W & *2’-.W 3 P[YW *2’+)W ]Y *2’-.W * ?Y WONS^WLON YP ‘OKU VSQR] Q[Ob ]Y Q[Ob \SV]\]YXO7O]KSV *2’1+W & *2’1.W 3 P[YW *2’1+W ]Y *2’1.W [OMY_O[ON K\XYX SX]KM] MY[O "KXQ^VK[ WONS^W ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV#P[YW +)’)+W ]Y +)’),W * ?Y ]RSMU VKWSXK]SYX YP [ONNS\RL[Y‘X PS[W MVKbP[YW +)’*0W ]Y +)’++W KXN +)’,1W ]Y +)’-,W [OMY_O[ON K\ XYXSX]KM] MY[O "KXQ^VK[ WONS^W ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV#
8aZVY[K]Y[b RYVO MYWZVO]O K] +)’.) W’
DROO] , YP ,
9]ZXOP[_S
FZOP[_S
9W‘^S_d[P
9W‘^S]P_‘]Y
$ EPL_TYR MWZb^ ZYWd&
DPXL]V^ 6L^TYR IL_P]OP[_S
6ST^PWWTYR
9Z]X AZ& E<8JC;B?8;7D <^^‘P&DPaT^TZY AZ& )&(- <^^‘P 7L_P **’)(’*()*
8\‘T[XPY_FZ[ 5L^P Fd[P 7L_P E_L]_PO 7L_P 8YOPO 6]Pb EPN_TZY ESZ]TYR ’ DPXL]V^
LWW OTLXP_P]^ TY XTWWTXP_]P^&SL]O ^_]L_L _TXP TY SSXX
8YP]Rd]L_TZ
FZ[ 5L^P 7TLXP_P] FTXP DPNZaP]d!
7KA4@<6 E4@C?<A:
[PYP_]L_TZY TY XX;LXXP]
AZ&
CL]_ ZQ _SP 5LNSd EZWP_LYNSP :]Z‘[
Fd[P DP^[ZY^P eZYPFZ[ 5L^P
CT[P
?ZR E_L_‘^2 9TYLW
9Z] OP_LTW^ ZQ LMM]PaTL_TZY^% ^PP VPd
F4/+*1
*,’(*’*(),,-&1+X B7
5‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 7P]Md^ST]P GF6
5‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 7P]Md^ST]P 6ZWWPRP@Z__ @LN7ZYLWO ?_O
?ZR C]TY_ 7L_P 4YO FTXP2 ).’(,’*(), )(2-(2)-
,*,(0*&(( 8% +*+,.)&.( A AL_TZYLW :]TO*-’(*’*(), HP]_TNLW
5;(+
(&(( )&*( <C *,’(*’*(), *,’(*’*(), =7 F8 ;LYO FZZW^)&*( )(&*( 6C *,’(*’*(), *-’(*’*(), =7 F8 7LYOZ +(((
)-(
/&/(
(&(( (&)( 5T_‘XTYZ‘^ XL_P]TLW(&)( (&-( 6ZYN]P_P(&-( ,&+( 5PY_ZYT_P,&+( /&/( :]LaPW MLNVQTWW/&/( )(&*( 5PY_ZYT_P
*,’(*’*(), )/+( +&*( +&*( 8YO ZQ ESTQ_*-’(*’*(), (/+( +&*( +&*( E_L]_ ZQ ESTQ_*-’(*’*(), )/+( )(&*( 1&(( 8YO ZQ ;ZWP
(&(( (&+( ),+( ((+( 5]PLVTYR Z‘_1&0( )(&(( )),- ()(( 6ST^PWWTYR
()
)(&*( )-(
EC
1&((
,&+( /&/(
7DK*&0(,&/(
() (&(( ,&-( -( CWLTY() ,&-( /&-( -( EWZ__PO
)&-( ECF"6# A3). ")%*%*%+%-%.# 4D+-0 /* )&-( 7DK*&-( ECF"6# A3)0 "+%+%,%,%-%-# 4D+-0 /* *&-( 7DK+&-( ECF"6# A3** "*%+%-%.%.%-# 4D+-0 /* +&-( +&*(,&-( ECF"6# A3+- "+%,%0%)(%1%0# 4D+-0 /* ,&-( +&*(-&-( ECF"6# A3+( "+%-%/%/%0%0# 4D+-0 /* -&-( +&0(.&-( ECF"6# A3** "+%-%-%.%.%-# 4D+-0 /* .&-( ,&((/&-( ECF"6# A3*) ",%-%-%.%.%,# 4D+-0 /* /&-( ,&*(1&-( ECF"6# -(’*1-XX ".%0%)(%)*%)-%)+’/(# 4D+-0 /* 1&(( ,&/(
)(&(( ECF"6# -(’**(XX ".%))%),%)0%)0’/(# 4D+-0 /* 1&(( ,&/(
C<C8 6BAEFDG6F<BA
<7
OP[_S
SSXX^^
5T_6Z]P 6Z]P
5L]]PW E‘[[Z]_?ZRRPO 5d
7TL&ZQ [T[P
!
DPXL]V^@L_P]TLW^PN_TZY
5L^P ZQ^PN_TZY
FZ[ ZQ546>9<?? 78F4<?E
!7‘]L_TZY
SSXXE_L]_ _TXP
9W‘^SNZWZ‘]
_LVPYQWZb
FZ[ 5L^PFd[P ZQ
[T[P7T^_LYNP
<AEF4??4F<BA 78F4<?E
Q]ZX :&?&<7
C]ZUPN_ AZ&C]ZUPN_ ALXP
8X[WZdP]8YRTYPP]
6ZZ]OTYL_P^:]Z‘YO ?PaPW<YNWTYL_TZY7L_P E_L]_PO 7L_P 6ZX[WP_PO
;ZWP <7&8c[WZ]L_Z]d ;ZWP ?ZR
645?8 C8D6GEE<BA 78F4<?E
;B?8 7<4@8F8D ’ 64E<A:
I4F8D EFD<>8E
DBF4DK 9?GE; 78F4<?E
ECF 78F4<?E
CDB:D8EEDPXL]V^7L_P FTXP ;ZWP
OP[_S OP[_S6L^TYR IL_P]
OP[_S
;L]O E_]L_L 7P[_SQ]ZX _Z
SSXX
;ZWPOTLXP_P]
7P[_S ZQSZWP
6L^TYROTLXP_P]
7P[_S ZQNL^TYR
7L_P FTXP E_]TVP L_OP[_S OP[_S
DT^P _Z FTXP_Z ]T^P
6L^TYR OP[_SL_ ^_]TVP
_TXP_Z ^PLW
7P[_S Fd[P <YN]PXPY_LW MWZb NZ‘Y_ ’
;PLOP]
ABF8E2 4WW OP[_S^ TY XP_]P^%IL_P] ^_]TVP ]T^P _TXP TY XTY‘_P^%
:8A8D4? ABF8E
7O\M[SZ]SYX YP D][K]K =OQOXN 7OZ]R=O_OV7K]^W DKWZVSXQ
7O]KSV\<X DS]^ EO\] <X\]KVV&
K]SYX
?@E8D3 4VV NOZ]R\ SX WO][O\% KVV NSKWO]O[\ SX WSVVSWO][O\’DOO ROKNO[ \ROO] PY[ NO]KSV\ YP LY[SXQ%
;YVO <7’
7O]KSV\
5VY‘ 6Y^X] 4XN
A[YTOM] ?Y’
E6C D6C CB7
8WZVYbO[8XQSXOO[
6YY[NSXK]O\:[Y^XN =O_OV
8aZVY[K]Y[b ;YVO =YQA[YTOM] ?KWO
;YVO EbZO <XMVSXK]SYX
9Y[W ?Y’ D<8IA;@=8=@: <\\^O’CO_S\SYX ?Y’ *’). <\\^O 7K]O ++(*)(+)*+ AK[] YP ]RO 5KMRb DYVO]KXMRO :[Y^Z
DKWZVO COMY_O[b
9Y[ NO]KSV\ YP KLL[O_SK]SYX\% \OO UObZ[YQ[O\\ KXN ‘K]O[’
7SK’
=YQ D]K]^\3 9SXKV
<A$6A
E40,+2
-.’2,W @7
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O FE6
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O 6YVVOQO>Y]] >KM7YXKVN =]N
=YQ A[SX] 7K]O 4XN ESWO3 */()-(+)*- *)3.)3+)
-+-)1+’)) 8% ,+,-/*’/) ? ?K]SYXKV :[SNGO[]SMKV
5;),
)’*.
)’,)
*’-)
,’.)
-.’01
-.’/,
--’.,
-+’-,
8D))*
8D))+
8D)),7))-
8D)).5))/
7))05))1
8D))2
7)*)5)**
H)*+
7)*,5)*-
7)*.5)*/
)’*)
)’,)
)’.))’.)
*’))*’))
*’.)*’.)
+’))
+’.)+’.)
,’+)
,’.),’.)
-’.)-’.)
DAE"6#*/*’.)
DAE"6#*1+’.)
DAE"6#++,’.)
DAE"6#,.-’.)
*’2.
+’2.
,’2.
-’2.
>478 :C@F?73 EK[WKMKNKW’
>478 :C@F?73 CONNS\R L[Y‘X KXQ^VK[ MYLLVO \ScON P[KQWOX]\ YPL[SMU’ "6OWOX]ON 5[SMU\#
>478 :C@F?73 7K[U L[Y‘X MVKbOb PSXO ]Y MYK[\O \KXN \ScONP[KQWOX]\ KXN KXQ^VK[ ]Y \^LKXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV\ScON P[KQWOX]\ YP L[SMU% \KXN\]YXO% K\R KXN MVSXUO[’
>ONS^W NOX\O L[Y‘X MVKbOb PSXO ]Y MYK[\O D4?7 KXN \^L[Y^XNON]Y [Y^XNON PSXO ]Y MYK[\O :C4G8= YP WSaON VS]RYVYQSO\% ‘S]RVY‘ VYMKVVb WONS^W MYLLVO MYX]OX]’ 6YLLVO\ K[O \^L[Y^XNON ]Y[Y^XNON YP WSaON VS]RYVYQSO\’
>ONS^W NOX\O L[Y‘X \VSQR]Vb MVKbOb _O[b Q[K_OVVb PSXO ]YMYK[\O D4?7’ :[K_OV S\ \^L[Y^XNON ]Y [Y^XNON PSXO ]Y MYK[\O YPWSaON VS]RYVYQSO\’
P[YW -’.)W NOX\O
DROO] * YP ,
7O\M[SZ]SYX YP D][K]K =OQOXN 7OZ]R=O_OV7K]^W DKWZVSXQ
7O]KSV\<X DS]^ EO\] <X\]KVV&
K]SYX
?@E8D3 4VV NOZ]R\ SX WO][O\% KVV NSKWO]O[\ SX WSVVSWO][O\’DOO ROKNO[ \ROO] PY[ NO]KSV\ YP LY[SXQ%
;YVO <7’
7O]KSV\
5VY‘ 6Y^X] 4XN
A[YTOM] ?Y’
E6C D6C CB7
8WZVYbO[8XQSXOO[
6YY[NSXK]O\:[Y^XN =O_OV
8aZVY[K]Y[b ;YVO =YQA[YTOM] ?KWO
;YVO EbZO <XMVSXK]SYX
9Y[W ?Y’ D<8IA;@=8=@: <\\^O’CO_S\SYX ?Y’ *’). <\\^O 7K]O ++(*)(+)*+ AK[] YP ]RO 5KMRb DYVO]KXMRO :[Y^Z
DKWZVO COMY_O[b
9Y[ NO]KSV\ YP KLL[O_SK]SYX\% \OO UObZ[YQ[O\\ KXN ‘K]O[’
7SK’
=YQ D]K]^\3 9SXKV
<A$6A
E40,+2
-.’2,W @7
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O FE6
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O 6YVVOQO>Y]] >KM7YXKVN =]N
=YQ A[SX] 7K]O 4XN ESWO3 */()-(+)*- *)3.)3++
-+-)1+’)) 8% ,+,-/*’/) ? ?K]SYXKV :[SNGO[]SMKV
5;),
0’2)
2’.)
,1’),
,/’-,
7)*05)*1
7)*25)+)
7)+*5)++
7)+,F)+-
7)+.
7)+/5)+0
.’.)
.’.)
/’.)/’.)
0’.)0’.)
1’.)1’.)
2’))
2’.)2’.)
*)) "*))# !
DAE"6#,).’.)
DAE"6#++/’.)
DAE"6#+*0’.)
DAE"6#.)(+2.WW2’.)
.’2.
/’2.
0’2.
2’2.
P[YW /’.)W WONS^W NOX\O ‘S]R VY‘ MYLLVO MYX]OX]’ 6YLLVO\K[O \^L[Y^XNON ]Y [Y^XNON YP WSaON VS]RYVYQSO\
9S[W WONS^W \][OXQ]R [ONNS\R L[Y‘X WY]]VON VSQR] Q[Ob \VSQR]Vb\KXNb \VSQR]Vb Q[K_OVVb 6=4J’ DKXN S\ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O’ :[K_OVS\ KXQ^VK[ ]Y \^LKXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O YP W^N\]YXO’ ";SQRVbHOK]RO[ON >O[MSK >^N\]YXO#
GO[b ‘OKU [ONNS\R L[Y‘X WY]]VON Q[Ob >F7DE@?8’ COMY_O[ON K\\KXNb KXQ^VK[ ]Y \^LKXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV’
DROO] + YP ,
7O\M[SZ]SYX YP D][K]K =OQOXN 7OZ]R=O_OV7K]^W DKWZVSXQ
7O]KSV\<X DS]^ EO\] <X\]KVV&
K]SYX
?@E8D3 4VV NOZ]R\ SX WO][O\% KVV NSKWO]O[\ SX WSVVSWO][O\’DOO ROKNO[ \ROO] PY[ NO]KSV\ YP LY[SXQ%
;YVO <7’
7O]KSV\
5VY‘ 6Y^X] 4XN
A[YTOM] ?Y’
E6C D6C CB7
8WZVYbO[8XQSXOO[
6YY[NSXK]O\:[Y^XN =O_OV
8aZVY[K]Y[b ;YVO =YQA[YTOM] ?KWO
;YVO EbZO <XMVSXK]SYX
9Y[W ?Y’ D<8IA;@=8=@: <\\^O’CO_S\SYX ?Y’ *’). <\\^O 7K]O ++(*)(+)*+ AK[] YP ]RO 5KMRb DYVO]KXMRO :[Y^Z
DKWZVO COMY_O[b
9Y[ NO]KSV\ YP KLL[O_SK]SYX\% \OO UObZ[YQ[O\\ KXN ‘K]O[’
7SK’
=YQ D]K]^\3 9SXKV
<A$6A
E40,+2
-.’2,W @7
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O FE6
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O 6YVVOQO>Y]] >KM7YXKVN =]N
=YQ A[SX] 7K]O 4XN ESWO3 */()-(+)*- *)3.)3+,
-+-)1+’)) 8% ,+,-/*’/) ? ?K]SYXKV :[SNGO[]SMKV
5;),
*)’+) ,.’0,
7)+1 *)’)) DAE"6#.)(++)WW*)’)) *)’,0
8aZVY[K]Y[b RYVO MYWZVO]O K] *)’+) W’
DROO] , YP ,
9]ZXOP[_S
FZOP[_S
9W‘^S_d[P
9W‘^S]P_‘]Y
$ EPL_TYR MWZb^ ZYWd&
DPXL]V^ 6L^TYR IL_P]OP[_S
6ST^PWWTYR
9Z]X AZ& E<8JC;B?8;7D <^^‘P&DPaT^TZY AZ& )&(- <^^‘P 7L_P **’)(’*()*
8\‘T[XPY_FZ[ 5L^P Fd[P 7L_P E_L]_PO 7L_P 8YOPO 6]Pb EPN_TZY ESZ]TYR ’ DPXL]V^
LWW OTLXP_P]^ TY XTWWTXP_]P^&SL]O ^_]L_L _TXP TY SSXX
8YP]Rd]L_TZ
FZ[ 5L^P 7TLXP_P] FTXP DPNZaP]d!
7KA4@<6 E4@C?<A:
[PYP_]L_TZY TY XX;LXXP]
AZ&
CL]_ ZQ _SP 5LNSd EZWP_LYNSP :]Z‘[
Fd[P DP^[ZY^P eZYPFZ[ 5L^P
CT[P
?ZR E_L_‘^2 9TYLW
9Z] OP_LTW^ ZQ LMM]PaTL_TZY^% ^PP VPd
F4/+*1
)1’(*’*(),,.&(,X B7
5‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 7P]Md^ST]P GF6
5‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 7P]Md^ST]P 6ZWWPRP@Z__ @LN7ZYLWO ?_O
?ZR C]TY_ 7L_P 4YO FTXP2 ).’(,’*(), )(2-)2,+
,*,(.,&,( 8% +*+,*1&/( A AL_TZYLW :]TO*,’(*’*(), HP]_TNLW
5;(,
(&(( )&*( <C )1’(*’*(), )1’(*’*(), =7 F8 ;LYO FZZW^)&*( )(&+( 6C )1’(*’*(), *(’(*’*(), =7 F8 7LYOZ +(((
)(&+( *(&+( D6 *)’(*’*(), *,’(*’*(), @@ AE CI9 C67 6ZXLNNSTZ
)-()*)
*(&+(
(&(( (&-( 6ZYN]P_P(&-( *&)( 5PY_ZYT_P*&)( .&*( :]LaPW MLNVQTWW.&*( *(&+( 5PY_ZYT_P
)1’(*’*(), )/+( /&-( /&-( 8YO ZQ ESTQ_*(’(*’*(), (/+( /&-( /&-( E_L]_ ZQ ESTQ_*(’(*’*(), )+)- )(&+( )(&+( 8YO ZQ 6C*)’(*’*(), (/+( )(&+( )(&+( E_L]_ ZQ ESTQ_*)’(*’*(), )/+( ),&/- ))&0( 8YO ZQ ESTQ_*,’(*’*(), (/+( ),&/- ))&0( E_L]_ ZQ ESTQ_*,’(*’*(), )--( *(&+( ))&0( 8YO ZQ ;ZWP
(&(( (&*( )*,- ((+( 5]PLVTYR Z‘_)(&(( )(&+( ()(( 6ST^PWWTYR
)(&+( ))&-( IL_P] 0( CTYV))&-( ),&/- IL_P] 0- CTYV),&/- *(&+( IL_P] 0( CTYV
()
/&-(*(&+(
)-()*-
EC
/&-())&0(
*&+( .&*(
+&*(+&-(,&(((&,(*&*(*&)(AD
() (&(( *&-( -( CWLTY() *&-( .&(( -( EWZ__PO
)&-( ECF"6# A3)) ")%*%*%*%+%,# 4D+-0 /* )&-( 7DK*&-( ECF"6# A3)( ")%)%*%*%+%+# 4D+-0 /* *&-( 7DK+&-( ECF"6# A30 ")%)%*%*%*%*# 4D+-0 /* +&-( +&*(,&-( ECF"6# A3*/ "*%+%,%.%0%1# 4D+-0 /* ,&-( +&0(-&-( ECF"6# A3+- "+%-%.%1%)(%)(# 4D+-0 /* -&-( +&1(/&-( ECF"6# A3-( ",%0%)(%)*%)-%)+# 4D+-0 /* /&-( +&-(0&-( ECF"6# -(’**-XX "-%0%)*%*(%)0# 4D+-0 /* 0&-( +&/(1&-( ECF"6# -(’**-XX ".%)(%)-%**%)+# 4D+-0 /* 1&-( +&0(
)(&(( ECF"6# -(’**-XX "/%)-%*(%*-%-# 4D+-0 /* )(&(( ,&((
)1’(*’*(), ),,- +&-( +&(( *( +&-( AE
C<C8 6BAEFDG6F<BA
<7
OP[_S
SSXX^^
5T_6Z]P 6Z]P
5L]]PW E‘[[Z]_?ZRRPO 5d
7TL&ZQ [T[P
!
DPXL]V^@L_P]TLW^PN_TZY
5L^P ZQ^PN_TZY
FZ[ ZQ546>9<?? 78F4<?E
!7‘]L_TZY
SSXXE_L]_ _TXP
9W‘^SNZWZ‘]
_LVPYQWZb
FZ[ 5L^PFd[P ZQ
[T[P7T^_LYNP
<AEF4??4F<BA 78F4<?E
Q]ZX :&?&<7
C]ZUPN_ AZ&C]ZUPN_ ALXP
8X[WZdP]8YRTYPP]
6ZZ]OTYL_P^:]Z‘YO ?PaPW<YNWTYL_TZY7L_P E_L]_PO 7L_P 6ZX[WP_PO
;ZWP <7&8c[WZ]L_Z]d ;ZWP ?ZR
645?8 C8D6GEE<BA 78F4<?E
;B?8 7<4@8F8D ’ 64E<A:
I4F8D EFD<>8E
DBF4DK 9?GE; 78F4<?E
ECF 78F4<?E
CDB:D8EEDPXL]V^7L_P FTXP ;ZWP
OP[_S OP[_S6L^TYR IL_P]
OP[_S
;L]O E_]L_L 7P[_SQ]ZX _Z
SSXX
;ZWPOTLXP_P]
7P[_S ZQSZWP
6L^TYROTLXP_P]
7P[_S ZQNL^TYR
7L_P FTXP E_]TVP L_OP[_S OP[_S
DT^P _Z FTXP_Z ]T^P
6L^TYR OP[_SL_ ^_]TVP
_TXP_Z ^PLW
7P[_S Fd[P <YN]PXPY_LW MWZb NZ‘Y_ ’
;PLOP]
ABF8E2 4WW OP[_S^ TY XP_]P^%IL_P] ^_]TVP ]T^P _TXP TY XTY‘_P^%
:8A8D4? ABF8E
8P]N\T[^TZY ZQ E^\L^L >PRPYO 8P[^S>P‘PW8L^_X ELX[WTYR
8P^LTW]=Y ET^_ FP]^ =Y]^LWW’
L^TZY
@AF9E4 5WW OP[^S] TY XP^\P]& LWW OTLXP^P\] TY XTWWTXP^\P](EPP SPLOP\ ]SPP^ QZ\ OP^LTW] ZQ MZ\TYR&
<ZWP =8(
8P^LTW]
6WZa 7Z_Y^ 5YO
B\ZUPN^ @Z(
F7D E7D DC8
9X[WZcP\9YRTYPP\
7ZZ\OTYL^P];\Z_YO >P‘PW
9b[WZ\L^Z\c <ZWP >ZRB\ZUPN^ @LXP
<ZWP Fc[P =YNWTYL^TZY
:Z\X @Z( E=9JB<A>9>A; =]]_P(DP‘T]TZY @Z( +(*/ =]]_P 8L^P ,,)+*),*+, BL\^ ZQ ^SP 6LNSc EZWP^LYNSP ;\Z_[
ELX[WP DPNZ‘P\c
:Z\ OP^LTW] ZQ LMM\P‘TL^TZY]& ]PP VPc[\ZR\P]] LYO aL^P\(
8TL(
>ZR E^L^_]4 :TYLW
=B%7B%D7
F51-,3
.0(*.X A8
6_\^ZY LYO EZ_^S 8P\Mc]ST\P GF7
6_\^ZY LYO EZ_^S 8P\Mc]ST\P 7ZWWPRP?Z^^ ?LN8ZYLWO >^O
>ZR B\TY^ 8L^P 5YO FTXP4 +0)*.),*+. +*4/+4.1
.,.*0.(.* 9& -,-.,3(1* @ @L^TZYLW ;\TOHP\^TNLW
=:
6<*.
*(+*
*(.*
,(.*
0(-*
2(/*
./(3.
./(0.
.-(0.
-3(1.
-1(/.
9E**+
9E**,8**-
9E**.6**/
8**09E**16**2
8**36*+*
8*++6*+,I*+-
8*+.6*+/
8*+06*+1
G:8*+26*+3
8*,*
8*,+
8*,,
*(,*
*(/**(/*
+(**+(**’+(/*
+(/*+(/*+(/*’,(**
,(/*,(/*’-(**
-(/*-(/*’.(**-(/*
.(/*
.(/*’/(**
/(/*/(/*’0(**
0(/*’0(3/0(/*0(/*’1(**
1(/*
2(/*
3(/*
+** #0,$ *!
EBF#7$+++(/*
EBF#7$+*,(/*
EBF#7$2-(/*
EBF#7$,1.(/*
EBF#7$-//(/*
EBF#7$/*1(/*
EBF#7$/*),,/XX2(/*
EBF#7$/*),,/XX3(/*
+(3/
,(3/
-(3/
.(3/
/(3/
1(3/
2(22
3(22
?589 ;DAG@84 FL\XLNLOLX(
?589 ;DAG@84 8L\V R\Pc ]WTRS^Wc NWLcPc ‘P\c ]LYOc LYR_WL\ ^Z]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^] ZQ M\TNV&L]S& NWTYVP\ LYO ]LYO]^ZYP( IT^S WZa NZMMWP NZY^PY^( ELYO]TdPO Q\LRXPY^] L\P QTYP ^Z NZL\]P( 7ZMMWP ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^] L\PLYR_WL\ ZQ M\TNV(
?589 ;DAG@84 6\ZaY NWLcPc QTYP ^Z NZL\]P ]LYO ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^]LYO ]_MLYR_WL\ ^Z ]_M\Z_YOPO QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW ]TdPOQ\LRXPY^] ZQ XTbPO WT^SZWZRTP] aT^S WZa NZMMWP NZY^PY^( 7ZMMWP]TdPO Q\LRXPY^] L\P ]_M\Z_YOPO ^Z \Z_YOPO ZQ XTbPOWT^SZWZRTP](
>ZZ]P M\ZaY NWLcPc QTYP ^Z NZL\]P E5@8 LYO ]_M\Z_YOPO ^Z\Z_YOPO QTYP ^Z NZL\]P ;D5H9> ZQ XTbPO WT^SZWZRTP]& aT^S WZaWZNLWWc XPOT_X NZMMWP NZY^PY^( 7ZMMWP] L\P ]_M\Z_YOPO ^Z\Z_YOPO ZQ XTbPO WT^SZWZRTP](
Q\ZX .(/*X XPOT_X OPY]P ]WTRS^Wc NWLcPc
Q\ZX /(/*X OPY]P
:T\X \POOT]S M\ZaY XZ^^WPO WTRS^ R\Pc ]WTRS^Wc R\L‘PWWc 7>5K(;\L‘PW T] LYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]P ZQ X_O]^ZYP( #IPL^SP\PO?P\NTL ?_O]^ZYP$
HP\c aPLV ^Z aPLV WTRS^ R\Pc ?G8EFA@9( DPNZ‘P\PO L] ]LYOcLYR_WL\ ^Z ]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z XPOT_X R\L‘PW ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^](
ESPP^ + ZQ -
HP\c aPLV ^Z aPLV \POOT]S M\ZaY ?G8EFA@9( DPNZ‘P\PO L] LYR_WL\^Z ]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^](
9b^\PXPWc aPLV \POOT]S M\ZaY ?G8EFA@9( DPNZ‘P\PO L] YZY TY^LN^NZ\P #]WTRS^Wc NWLcPc QTYP ^Z NZL\]P ]LYO ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^]$(
5]]_XPO dZYP ZQ NZ\P WZ]]( #>ZNLWWc aPL^SP\PO XP\NTL ?G8EFA@9YZY TY^LN^$( #8\TWWP\"] OP]N\T[^TZY$
9b^\PXPWc aPLV \POOT]S M\ZaY XZ^^WPO R\PPYT]S R\Pc ?G8EFA@9(DPNZ‘P\PO L] YZY TY^LN^ NZ\P #]WTRS^Wc NWLcPc ]LYOc LYR_WL\ ^Z]_M\Z_YOPO QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^]$(
Q\ZX +,(+1X ^Z +,(+3X TY^LN^ NZ\P( 9b^\PXPWc aPLV R\PPYT]SR\Pc X_O]^ZYP
5]]_XPO dZYP ZQ NZ\P WZ]](
IPLV ^Z XPOT_X ]^\ZYR \POOT]S M\ZaY XZ^^WPO R\PPYT]S R\Pc?G8EFA@9 aT^S Pb^\PXPWc NWZ]PWc ][LNPO \LYOZXWc Z\TPY^L^PORc[]_X ‘PTY]( 8T]NZY^TY_T^TP]4 +$ *’+* OPR\PP] ‘P\c NWZ]PWcWZNLWWc NWZ]PWc ][LNPO \Z_RS _YO_WL^TYR(
Q\ZX +,(/*X ^Z +,(2*X R\PPYT]S R\Pc XZ^^WPO \POOT]S M\ZaYQ\ZX +-(*.X ^Z +-(,,X \PNZ‘P\PO L] YZY TY^LN^ NZ\P#]WTRS^Wc NWLcPc ]LYOc LYR_WL\ ^Z ]_M\Z_YOPO QTYP ^Z NZL\]PR\L‘PW ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^]$Q\ZX +-(,,X ^Z +-(0+X \PNZ‘P\PO L] YZY TY^LN^ NZ\P #LYR_WL\^Z ]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^]$Q\ZX +-(10X ^Z +.(**X L]]_XPO dZYP ZQ NZ\P WZ]]Q\ZX +.(,3X ^Z +.(./X \PNZ‘P\PO L] YZY TY^LN^ NZ\P#]WTRS^Wc NWLcPc ]LYOc LYR_WL\ ^Z ]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]PR\L‘PW ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^]$Q\ZX +.(00X ^Z +/(.*X R\PPYT]S R\Pc XZ^^WPO \POOT]S M\ZaY
Q\ZX +/(+3X ^Z +/(.*X \PNZ‘P\PO L] YZY TY^LN^ NZ\P #]LYOcLYR_WL\ ^Z ]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^]aT^S ZNNL]TZYLW NZMMWP]( ELYO T] QTYP ^Z NZL\]P( ;\L‘PW T]QTYP ^Z NZL\]P LYR_WL\ ^Z ]_MLYR_WL\( 7ZMMWP] L\P]_MLYR_WL\$Q\ZX +/(.0X ^Z +/(/+X \PNZ‘P\PO L] YZY TY^LN^ NZ\P #LYR_WL\^Z ]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^]$Q\ZX +/(3*X ^Z +/(3-X& +/(33X ^Z +0(*,X LYO +0(+-X ^Z+0(,*X \PNZ‘P\PO L] YZY TY^LN^ NZ\P #]WTRS^Wc NWLcPc ]LYOcLYR_WL\ ^Z ]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW ]TdPOQ\LRXPY^]$Q\ZX +0(//X ^Z +0(/3X \PNZ‘P\PO L] YZY TY^LN^ NZ\P #]LYOcLYR_WL\ ^Z ]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW ]TdPOQ\LRXPY^]$Q\ZX +0(1+X ^Z +0(2+X \PNZ‘P\PO L] YZY TY^LN^ NZ\P #LYR_WL\^Z ]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^]$Q\ZX +1(*,X ^Z +1(*3X \PNZ‘P\PO L] YZY TY^LN^ NZ\P #LYR_WL\^Z ]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^]$
Q\ZX +2(+*X ^Z+2(+1X \PNZ‘P\PO L] YZY TY^LN^ NZ\P #LYR_WL\^Z ]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^]$Q\ZX +2(-0X ^Z +2(-2X& +2(0/X ^Z +2(1.X LYO +2(12X ^Z+2(2,X \PNZ‘P\PO L] YZY TY^LN^ NZ\P #]WTRS^Wc ]LYOc LYR_WL\^Z ]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW ]TdPO Q\LRXPY^] aT^SWZa NZMMWP NZY^PY^( ELYO T] QTYP ^Z NZL\]P( 7ZMMWP] L\P]_MLYR_WL\$
Q\ZX +3(,/X ^Z +3(-* LYO ,*(++X ^Z ,*(,*X \PNZ‘P\PO L] YZYTY^LN^ NZ\P #LYR_WL\ ^Z ]_MLYR_WL\ QTYP ^Z NZL\]P R\L‘PW]TdPO Q\LRXPY^]$
ESPP^ , ZQ -
8P]N\T[^TZY ZQ E^\L^L >PRPYO 8P[^S>P‘PW8L^_X ELX[WTYR
8P^LTW]=Y ET^_ FP]^ =Y]^LWW’
L^TZY
@AF9E4 5WW OP[^S] TY XP^\P]& LWW OTLXP^P\] TY XTWWTXP^\P](EPP SPLOP\ ]SPP^ QZ\ OP^LTW] ZQ MZ\TYR&
<ZWP =8(
8P^LTW]
6WZa 7Z_Y^ 5YO
B\ZUPN^ @Z(
F7D E7D DC8
9X[WZcP\9YRTYPP\
7ZZ\OTYL^P];\Z_YO >P‘PW
9b[WZ\L^Z\c <ZWP >ZRB\ZUPN^ @LXP
<ZWP Fc[P =YNWTYL^TZY
:Z\X @Z( E=9JB<A>9>A; =]]_P(DP‘T]TZY @Z( +(*/ =]]_P 8L^P ,,)+*),*+, BL\^ ZQ ^SP 6LNSc EZWP^LYNSP ;\Z_[
ELX[WP DPNZ‘P\c
:Z\ OP^LTW] ZQ LMM\P‘TL^TZY]& ]PP VPc[\ZR\P]] LYO aL^P\(
8TL(
>ZR E^L^_]4 :TYLW
=B%7B%D7
F51-,3
.0(*.X A8
6_\^ZY LYO EZ_^S 8P\Mc]ST\P GF7
6_\^ZY LYO EZ_^S 8P\Mc]ST\P 7ZWWPRP?Z^^ ?LN8ZYLWO >^O
>ZR B\TY^ 8L^P 5YO FTXP4 +0)*.),*+. +*4/+4.3
.,.*0.(.* 9& -,-.,3(1* @ @L^TZYLW ;\TOHP\^TNLW
=:
6<*.
+*(**
+*(-*
+*(20
++(/*
+,(+3
+,(/*
-0(*.
-/(1.
-/(+2
-.(/.
--(2/
--(/.
8*,-
+*(-*
++(/*
+,(**
+,(/*
+-(**
+.(**
+.(1/
+0(,/
+1(1/
+2(//
+3(**
+*(**
++(/*
+,(**
+,(/*
+-(**
+.(**
+.(1/
+0(,/
+1(1/
+2(//
+3(**
,*(-*
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
.1
2,
-2
3*
10
+**
3-
33
+**
31
32
*
*
.
1,
+3
/-
/.
1-
0-
00
2,
*
*
*
,.
+/
+0
+3
-+
*
*
-.
@=@=
@5
@=@=
@5
@=/*
@=1*
@=
,*
+0*
+2*
EBF#7$/*),,/XX+*(** +*(-2
8P]N\T[^TZY ZQ E^\L^L >PRPYO 8P[^S>P‘PW8L^_X ELX[WTYR
8P^LTW]=Y ET^_ FP]^ =Y]^LWW’
L^TZY
@AF9E4 5WW OP[^S] TY XP^\P]& LWW OTLXP^P\] TY XTWWTXP^\P](EPP SPLOP\ ]SPP^ QZ\ OP^LTW] ZQ MZ\TYR&
<ZWP =8(
8P^LTW]
6WZa 7Z_Y^ 5YO
B\ZUPN^ @Z(
F7D E7D DC8
9X[WZcP\9YRTYPP\
7ZZ\OTYL^P];\Z_YO >P‘PW
9b[WZ\L^Z\c <ZWP >ZRB\ZUPN^ @LXP
<ZWP Fc[P =YNWTYL^TZY
:Z\X @Z( E=9JB<A>9>A; =]]_P(DP‘T]TZY @Z( +(*/ =]]_P 8L^P ,,)+*),*+, BL\^ ZQ ^SP 6LNSc EZWP^LYNSP ;\Z_[
ELX[WP DPNZ‘P\c
:Z\ OP^LTW] ZQ LMM\P‘TL^TZY]& ]PP VPc[\ZR\P]] LYO aL^P\(
8TL(
>ZR E^L^_]4 :TYLW
=B%7B%D7
F51-,3
.0(*.X A8
6_\^ZY LYO EZ_^S 8P\Mc]ST\P GF7
6_\^ZY LYO EZ_^S 8P\Mc]ST\P 7ZWWPRP?Z^^ ?LN8ZYLWO >^O
>ZR B\TY^ 8L^P 5YO FTXP4 +0)*.),*+. +*4/+4/.
.,.*0.(.* 9& -,-.,3(1* @ @L^TZYLW ;\TOHP\^TNLW
=:
6<*.
,*(-* ,/(1.
IPLV ^Z XPOT_X ]^\ZYR \POOT]S M\ZaY XZ^^WPO R\PPYT]S R\Pc?G8EFA@9 aT^S Pb^\PXPWc NWZ]PWc ][LNPO \LYOZXWc Z\TPY^L^PORc[]_X ‘PTY]( 8T]NZY^TY_T^TP]4 +$ *’+* OPR\PP] ‘P\c NWZ]PWcWZNLWWc NWZ]PWc ][LNPO \Z_RS _YO_WL^TYR(
Q\ZX ,*(*-X ^Z ,*(++X + @Z /*’0* OPR\PP] OT]NZY^TY_T^c[WLYL\ ]XZZ^S
9b[WZ\L^Z\c SZWP NZX[WP^P L^ ,*(-* X(
ESPP^ - ZQ -
9]ZXOP[_S
FZOP[_S
9W‘^S_d[P
9W‘^S]P_‘]Y
$ EPL_TYR MWZb^ ZYWd&
DPXL]V^ 6L^TYR IL_P]OP[_S
6ST^PWWTYR
9Z]X AZ& E<8JC;B?8;7D <^^‘P&DPaT^TZY AZ& )&(- <^^‘P 7L_P **’)(’*()*
8\‘T[XPY_FZ[ 5L^P Fd[P 7L_P E_L]_PO 7L_P 8YOPO 6]Pb EPN_TZY ESZ]TYR ’ DPXL]V^
LWW OTLXP_P]^ TY XTWWTXP_]P^&SL]O ^_]L_L _TXP TY SSXX
8YP]Rd]L_TZ
FZ[ 5L^P 7TLXP_P] FTXP DPNZaP]d!
7KA4@<6 E4@C?<A:
[PYP_]L_TZY TY XX;LXXP]
AZ&
CL]_ ZQ _SP 5LNSd EZWP_LYNSP :]Z‘[
Fd[P DP^[ZY^P eZYPFZ[ 5L^P
CT[P
?ZR E_L_‘^2 9TYLW
9Z] OP_LTW^ ZQ LMM]PaTL_TZY^% ^PP VPd
F4/+*1
*.’(*’*(),,.&*,X B7
5‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 7P]Md^ST]P GF6
5‘]_ZY LYO EZ‘_S 7P]Md^ST]P 6ZWWPRP@Z__ @LN7ZYLWO ?_O
?ZR C]TY_ 7L_P 4YO FTXP2 ).’(,’*(), )(2-(2+/
,*,(-*&.( 8% +*+,-*&.( A AL_TZYLW :]TO*.’(*’*(), HP]_TNLW
5;(-
(&(( )&*( <C *.’(*’*(), *.’(*’*(), =7 F8 ;LYO FZZW^)&*( 1&+( 6C *.’(*’*(), *.’(*’*(), =7 F8 7LYOZ +(((
)-(
.&((
(&(( (&)( 5T_‘XTYZ‘^ XL_P]TLW(&)( (&0( 6ZYN]P_P(&0( *&0( 5PY_ZYT_P*&0( .&*( :]LaPW MLNVQTWW.&*( 1&+( 5PY_ZYT_P
*.’(*’*(), )/+( 1&+( 0&(( 8YO ZQ ;ZWP
(&(( (&)- (/,- ((,- 5]PLVTYR Z‘_1&(( 1&+( )-+( ()(( 6ST^PWWTYR
()
1&+( )-(
EC
0&-(
*&0( .&*(
-&-(
() (&(( +&(( -( CWLTY() +&(( .&(( -( EWZ__PO
)&-( ECF"6# A3)( ")%*%*%*%+%+# 4D+-0 /* )&-( AD*&-( ECF"6# A3)- "*%*%+%,%,%,# 4D+-0 /* *&-( 7DK+&-( ECF"6# A3)0 "*%+%+%,%.%-# 4D+-0 /* +&-( 7DK,&-( ECF"6# A3+( "+%,%,%0%1%1# 4D+-0 /* ,&-( +&*(-&-( ECF"6# A3)1 ")%*%*%+%.%0# 4D+-0 /* -&-( +&*(.&-( ECF"6# A3*/ "+%,%.%.%0%/# 4D+-0 /* .&-( +&*(0&(( ECF -,’*1-XX "+%,%,%)(%)-%*-’/(# 4D+-0 /* 0&(( +&.(1&(( ECF -(’)-(XX "/%)-%*(%*-%-’(# 4D+-0 /* 0&-( -&-(
*.’(*’*(), ))(( ,&-( +&*( *( ,&-( AE
C<C8 6BAEFDG6F<BA
<7
OP[_S
SSXX^^
5T_6Z]P 6Z]P
5L]]PW E‘[[Z]_?ZRRPO 5d
7TL&ZQ [T[P
!
DPXL]V^@L_P]TLW^PN_TZY
5L^P ZQ^PN_TZY
FZ[ ZQ546>9<?? 78F4<?E
!7‘]L_TZY
SSXXE_L]_ _TXP
9W‘^SNZWZ‘]
_LVPYQWZb
FZ[ 5L^PFd[P ZQ
[T[P7T^_LYNP
<AEF4??4F<BA 78F4<?E
Q]ZX :&?&<7
C]ZUPN_ AZ&C]ZUPN_ ALXP
8X[WZdP]8YRTYPP]
6ZZ]OTYL_P^:]Z‘YO ?PaPW<YNWTYL_TZY7L_P E_L]_PO 7L_P 6ZX[WP_PO
;ZWP <7&8c[WZ]L_Z]d ;ZWP ?ZR
645?8 C8D6GEE<BA 78F4<?E
;B?8 7<4@8F8D ’ 64E<A:
I4F8D EFD<>8E
DBF4DK 9?GE; 78F4<?E
ECF 78F4<?E
CDB:D8EEDPXL]V^7L_P FTXP ;ZWP
OP[_S OP[_S6L^TYR IL_P]
OP[_S
;L]O E_]L_L 7P[_SQ]ZX _Z
SSXX
;ZWPOTLXP_P]
7P[_S ZQSZWP
6L^TYROTLXP_P]
7P[_S ZQNL^TYR
7L_P FTXP E_]TVP L_OP[_S OP[_S
DT^P _Z FTXP_Z ]T^P
6L^TYR OP[_SL_ ^_]TVP
_TXP_Z ^PLW
7P[_S Fd[P <YN]PXPY_LW MWZb NZ‘Y_ ’
;PLOP]
ABF8E2 4WW OP[_S^ TY XP_]P^%IL_P] ^_]TVP ]T^P _TXP TY XTY‘_P^%
:8A8D4? ABF8E
7O\M[SZ]SYX YP D][K]K =OQOXN 7OZ]R=O_OV7K]^W DKWZVSXQ
7O]KSV\<X DS]^ EO\] <X\]KVV&
K]SYX
?@E8D3 4VV NOZ]R\ SX WO][O\% KVV NSKWO]O[\ SX WSVVSWO][O\’DOO ROKNO[ \ROO] PY[ NO]KSV\ YP LY[SXQ%
;YVO <7’
7O]KSV\
5VY‘ 6Y^X] 4XN
A[YTOM] ?Y’
E6C D6C CB7
8WZVYbO[8XQSXOO[
6YY[NSXK]O\:[Y^XN =O_OV
8aZVY[K]Y[b ;YVO =YQA[YTOM] ?KWO
;YVO EbZO <XMVSXK]SYX
9Y[W ?Y’ D<8IA;@=8=@: <\\^O’CO_S\SYX ?Y’ *’). <\\^O 7K]O ++(*)(+)*+ AK[] YP ]RO 5KMRb DYVO]KXMRO :[Y^Z
DKWZVO COMY_O[b
9Y[ NO]KSV\ YP KLL[O_SK]SYX\% \OO UObZ[YQ[O\\ KXN ‘K]O[’
7SK’
=YQ D]K]^\3 9SXKV
<A$6A
E40,+2
-/’+-W @7
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O FE6
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O 6YVVOQO>Y]] >KM7YXKVN =]N
=YQ A[SX] 7K]O 4XN ESWO3 */()-(+)*- *)3.)3-+
-+-).+’/) 8% ,+,-.+’/) ? ?K]SYXKV :[SNGO[]SMKV
5;).
)’*)
)’+)
)’-)
-/’*-
-/’)-
-.’1-
8D))*
8D))+
8D)),7))-
8D)).5))/
7))05))1
7))25)*)
7)**5)*+
H)*,7)*-5)*.
)’*)
)’+.
)’.))’.)
*’))*’))
*’.)*’.)&+’))
+’.)+’.)&,’))
,’.),’.)&-’))
-’.)-’.)-’.)&.’))
DAE"6#*)*’.)
DAE"6#*.+’.)
DAE"6#*1,’.)
DAE"6#,)-’.)
*’2.
+’2.
,’2.
-’2.
>478 :C@F?73 EK[WKMKNKW’
>478 :C@F?73 5VKMU Q[K_OVVb PSXO ]Y MYK[\O \KXN \ScONP[KQWOX]\’ :[K_OV \ScON P[KQWOX]\ K[O KXQ^VK[ ]Y \^LKXQ^VK[PSXO ]Y MYK[\O YP K\R% MVSXUO[% L[SMU% MYXM[O]O KXN \KXN\]YXO’"4\R 9SVV#
>478 :C@F?73 >Y]]VON [ONNS\R L[Y‘X \KXNb KXQ^VK[ ]Y \^LKXQ^VK[PSXO ]Y MYK[\O Q[K_OV \ScON P[KQWOX]\ YP L[SMU KXN K\R’ DKXN\ScON P[KQWOX]\ K[O PSXO ]Y MYK[\O’ "5[SMU 9SVV#
>ONS^W NOX\O L[Y‘X MVKbOb PSXO ]Y MYK[\O D4?7 KXN KXQ^VK[ ]Y\^LKXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O :C4G8= YP WSaON VS]RYVYQSO\ ‘S]R VY‘VYMKVVb WONS^W MYLLVO MYX]OX]’ 6YLLVO\ K[O \^L[Y^XNON YPWSaON VS]RYVYQSO\’
P[YW ,’.)W \VSQR]Vb MVKbOb
DROO] * YP +
7O\M[SZ]SYX YP D][K]K =OQOXN 7OZ]R=O_OV7K]^W DKWZVSXQ
7O]KSV\<X DS]^ EO\] <X\]KVV&
K]SYX
?@E8D3 4VV NOZ]R\ SX WO][O\% KVV NSKWO]O[\ SX WSVVSWO][O\’DOO ROKNO[ \ROO] PY[ NO]KSV\ YP LY[SXQ%
;YVO <7’
7O]KSV\
5VY‘ 6Y^X] 4XN
A[YTOM] ?Y’
E6C D6C CB7
8WZVYbO[8XQSXOO[
6YY[NSXK]O\:[Y^XN =O_OV
8aZVY[K]Y[b ;YVO =YQA[YTOM] ?KWO
;YVO EbZO <XMVSXK]SYX
9Y[W ?Y’ D<8IA;@=8=@: <\\^O’CO_S\SYX ?Y’ *’). <\\^O 7K]O ++(*)(+)*+ AK[] YP ]RO 5KMRb DYVO]KXMRO :[Y^Z
DKWZVO COMY_O[b
9Y[ NO]KSV\ YP KLL[O_SK]SYX\% \OO UObZ[YQ[O\\ KXN ‘K]O[’
7SK’
=YQ D]K]^\3 9SXKV
<A$6A
E40,+2
-/’+-W @7
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O FE6
5^[]YX KXN DY^]R 7O[Lb\RS[O 6YVVOQO>Y]] >KM7YXKVN =]N
=YQ A[SX] 7K]O 4XN ESWO3 */()-(+)*- *)3.)3--
-+-).+’/) 8% ,+,-.+’/) ? ?K]SYXKV :[SNGO[]SMKV
5;).
/’1)
1’))
2’,)
,2’--
,1’+-
,/’2-
7)*/5)*0
7)*15)*2
7)+)F)+*
7)++
7)+,5)+-
7)+.
.’.)
.’.)&/’))
/’.)/’.)&0’))
0’))0’))&0’-.
0’.)
1’))&1’)01’))&1’.)
2’))&2’*.
*)) "/)# *))!
DAE"6#*2.’.)
DAE"6#+0/’.)
DAE.-(+2.WW1’))
DAE.)(*.)WW2’))
.’2.
/’2.
1’-.
2’,)
9S[W WONS^W \][OXQ]R [ONNS\R L[Y‘X WY]]VON Q[Ob \VSQR]Vb \KXNb\VSQR]Vb Q[K_OVVb 6=4J’ DKXN S\ PSXO ]Y MYK[\O’ :[K_OV S\KXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y WONS^W YP W^N\]YXO’ "HOK]RO[ON >O[MSK>^N\]YXO#
GO[b ‘OKU [ONNS\R L[Y‘X WY]]VON Q[Ob >F7DE@?8’ COMY_O[ON K\\VSQR]Vb \KXNb KXQ^VK[ PSXO ]Y WONS^W Q[K_OV’
8aZVY[K]Y[b RYVO MYWZVO]O K] 2’,) W’
DROO] + YP +
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION AExploratory Hole Records and Field Data
DYNAMIC SAMPLING RECORDS
section title sheets x25.indd 8 14/03/2013 16:17
9\YWNOZ^R
EYNOZ^R
9V_]R^cZO
9V_]R\O^_\X
$ DOK^SXQ LVYa] YXVc&
COWK\U] 6K]SXQ HK^O\NOZ^R
6RS]OVVSXQ
9Y\W @Y& D<8IB;A>8;7C <]]_O&CO‘S]SYX @Y& )&(- <]]_O 7K^O **’)(’*()*
8[_SZWOX^EYZ 5K]O EcZO 7K^O D^K\^ON 7K^O 8XNON 6\Oa DOM^SYX DRY\SXQ ’ COWK\U]
KVV NSKWO^O\] SX WSVVSWO^\O]&RK\N ]^\K^K ^SWO SX RRWW
8XO\Qc\K^SY
EYZ 5K]O 7SKWO^O\ ESWO COMY‘O\c!
7J@4?<6 D4?B><@:
ZOXO^\K^SYX SX WW;KWWO\
@Y&
BK\^ YP ^RO 5KMRc DYVO^KXMRO :\Y_Z
EcZO CO]ZYX]O dYXOEYZ 5K]O
BSZO
>YQ D^K^_]2 9SXKV
9Y\ NO^KSV] YP KLL\O‘SK^SYX]% ]OO UOc
E4/+*1
)0’(*’*(),,.&*.W A7
5_\^YX KXN DY_^R 7O\Lc]RS\O FE6
5_\^YX KXN DY_^R 7O\Lc]RS\O 6YVVOQO?Y^^ ?KM7YXKVN >^N
>YQ B\SX^ 7K^O 4XN ESWO2 ).’(,’*(), )(2-*2(+
,*,(+0&1( 8% +*+,0*&)( @ @K^SYXKV :\SN)0’(*’*(),
HSXNYa DKWZVO ^O\WSXK^ON K^ ,&,-W N_O ^Y YL]^\_M^SYX&)&*& HSXNYa DKWZVO MYVVKZ]ON LKMU ^Y ,&((W&
GO\^SMKV
HD()
(&(( )&*( <B )0’(*’*(), )0’(*’*(), :E E8 ;KXN EYYV])&*( ,&,- HD )0’(*’*(), )0’(*’*(), :E E8 EO\\SO\
))-
,&((
(&(( (&)( 5S^_WSXY_] WK^O\SKV(&)( (&+( 6YXM\O^O(&+( )&*( 5OX^YXS^O)&*( ,&,- :\K‘OV LKMUPSVV
)0’(*’*(), )/+( ,&,- ,&,- 8XN YP ;YVO
(&(( (&-( (1(( ((,( 5\OKUSXQ Y_^
()
,&,- ))-
DB
,&((
*&((
)&*( *&(( ))( -)*&(( +&(( ))( 1.+&(( ,&(( ))( )*1,&(( ,&*( ))( )((
,&,-
+&*(
() (&(( *&(( -( BVKSX() *&(( ,&(( -( DVY^^ON
)&*( DBE @30 ")%)%)%*%*%+# E7B. 0, @’4 7CJ*&(( DBE @3)/ "+%+%-%,%,%,# E7B. 0, @’4 7CJ+&(( DBE @3+, ".%/%)(%)(%/%/# E7B. 0, +&(( +&*(,&(( DBE @3*( "*%+%,%,%.%.# E7B. 0, ,&(( +&*(
B<B8 6A@DECF6E<A@
<7
NOZ^R
RRWW]]
5S^6Y\O 6Y\O
5K\\OV D_ZZY\^>YQQON 5c
7SK&YP ZSZO
!
COWK\U]?K^O\SKV]OM^SYX
5K]O YP]OM^SYX
EYZ YP546=9<>> 78E4<>D
!7_\K^SYX
RRWWD^K\^ ^SWO
9V_]RMYVY_\
^KUOXPVYa
EYZ 5K]OEcZO YP
ZSZO7S]^KXMO
<@DE4>>4E<A@ 78E4<>D
P\YW :&>&<7
B\YTOM^ @Y&B\YTOM^ @KWO
8WZVYcO\8XQSXOO\
6YY\NSXK^O]:\Y_XN >O‘OV<XMVSXK^SYX7K^O D^K\^ON 7K^O 6YWZVO^ON
;YVO <7&8bZVY\K^Y\c ;YVO >YQ
645>8 B8C6FDD<A@ 78E4<>D
;A>8 7<4?8E8C ’ 64D<@:
H4E8C DEC<=8D
CAE4CJ 9>FD; 78E4<>D
DBE 78E4<>D
BCA:C8DDCOWK\U]7K^O ESWO ;YVO
NOZ^R NOZ^R6K]SXQ HK^O\
NOZ^R
;K\N D^\K^K 7OZ^RP\YW ^Y
RRWW
;YVONSKWO^O\
7OZ^R YPRYVO
6K]SXQNSKWO^O\
7OZ^R YPMK]SXQ
7K^O ESWO D^\SUO K^NOZ^R NOZ^R
CS]O ^Y ESWO^Y \S]O
6K]SXQ NOZ^RK^ ]^\SUO
^SWO^Y ]OKV
7OZ^R EcZO <XM\OWOX^KV LVYa MY_X^ ’
;OKNO\
@AE8D2 4VV NOZ^R] SX WO^\O]%HK^O\ ]^\SUO \S]O ^SWO SX WSX_^O]%
:8@8C4> @AE8D
4KXIWOVYOUT UL AYWGYG :KMKTJ 4KVYN:K[KR4GYZS AGSVROTM
4KYGORX9T AOYZ BKXY 9TXYGRR#
GYOUT
<=B5A0 1RR JKVYNX OT SKYWKX" GRR JOGSKYKWX OT SORROSKYWKX$AKK NKGJKW XNKKY LUW JKYGORX UL HUWOTM"
8URK 94$
4KYGORX
2RU\ 3UZTY 1TJ
>WUPKIY <U$
B3@ A3@ @?4
5SVRU^KW5TMOTKKW
3UUWJOTGYKX7WUZTJ :K[KR
5]VRUWGYUW^ 8URK :UM>WUPKIY <GSK
8URK B^VK 9TIROTGYOUT
6UWS <U$ A95F>8=:5:=7 9XXZK$@K[OXOUT <U$ ’$&+ 9XXZK 4GYK ((%’&%(&’( >GWY UL YNK 2GIN^ AURKYGTINK 7WUZV
AGSVRK @KIU[KW^
6UW JKYGORX UL GHHWK[OGYOUTX" XKK QK^VWUMWKXX GTJ \GYKW$
4OG$
:UM AYGYZX0 6OTGR
9>!EA
B1-)(/
*,$(,S =4
2ZWYUT GTJ AUZYN 4KWH^XNOWK CB3
2ZWYUT GTJ AUZYN 4KWH^XNOWK 3URRKMK;UYY ;GI4UTGRJ :YJ
:UM >WOTY 4GYK 1TJ BOSK0 ’,%&*%(&’* ’&0+(0&,
*(*&).$/& 5" )()*.($’& < <GYOUTGR 7WOJDKWYOIGR
EA&’
&$’&&$(&
&$+&
’$(&
*$*+
*,$’,*,$&,
*+$-,
*+$&,
*’$.’
5A&&’
5A&&(2&&)4&&*
5A&&+4&&,5A&&-4&&.2&&/
4&’&2&’’
4&’(2&’)
4&’*2&’+
&$(&
&$+&&$+&&$+&
’$&&’$&&’$(&’$(&#’$,+’$(&#($&&
($&&#($*+($&&#)$&&
)$&&#)$*+)$&&#*$&&
*$&&#*$*+*$&&#*$(&
A>B.’$(&
A>B’-($&&
A>B)*)$&&
A>B(&*$&&
’$,+
($*+
)$*+
*$*+
;145 7@=C<40 BGWSGIGJGS$
;145 7@=C<40 2WU\T XGTJ^ GTMZRGW YU XZHGTMZRGW LOTK YU IUGWXKMWG[KR XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX UL ROSKXYUTK$ AGTJ XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GWKLOTK YU IUGWXK$
;145 7@=C<40 2RGIQ LOTK YU IUGWXK XGTJ XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GTJGTMZRGW YU XZHGTMZRGW LOTK YU IUGWXK MWG[KR XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX ULHWOIQ" GXN" IROTQKW GTJ XGTJXYUTK$
;145 7@=C<40 2WU\T XGTJ^ MWG[KRR^ IRG^ \OYN RU\ IUHHRKIUTYKTY$ AGTJ XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GWK LOTK YU IUGWXK$ 7WG[KR XO_KJLWGMSKTYX GWK GTMZRGW YU XZHWUZTJKJ LOTK YU IUGWXK UL HWOIQ"IROTQKW" GXN GTJ SO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX$ 3UHHRK XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GWKXZHWUZTJKJ YU WUZTJKJ UL SO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX$
:UUXK HKIUSOTM SKJOZS JKTXK UWGTMOXN HWU\T IRG^K^ [KW^MWG[KRR^ LOTK YU IUGWXK A1<4$ 7WG[KR OX XZHWUZTJKJ YU WUZTJKJLOTK YU IUGWXK UL SO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX$
LWUS ’$(&S YU ’$,&S XROMNYR^ IRG^K^
GY )$&&S XROMNYR^ IRG^K^ MWG[KRR^ LOTK YU IUGWXK XGTJLWUS )$’&S HKIUSOTM WKJJOXN HWU\T
5]VRUWGYUW^ NURK IUSVRKYK GY *$*+ S$
ANKKY ’ UL ’
9\YWNOZ^R
EYNOZ^R
9V_]R^cZO
9V_]R\O^_\X
$ DOK^SXQ LVYa] YXVc&
COWK\U] 6K]SXQ HK^O\NOZ^R
6RS]OVVSXQ
9Y\W @Y& D<8IB;A>8;7C <]]_O&CO‘S]SYX @Y& )&(- <]]_O 7K^O **’)(’*()*
8[_SZWOX^EYZ 5K]O EcZO 7K^O D^K\^ON 7K^O 8XNON 6\Oa DOM^SYX DRY\SXQ ’ COWK\U]
KVV NSKWO^O\] SX WSVVSWO^\O]&RK\N ]^\K^K ^SWO SX RRWW
8XO\Qc\K^SY
EYZ 5K]O 7SKWO^O\ ESWO COMY‘O\c!
7J@4?<6 D4?B><@:
ZOXO^\K^SYX SX WW;KWWO\
@Y&
BK\^ YP ^RO 5KMRc DYVO^KXMRO :\Y_Z
EcZO CO]ZYX]O dYXOEYZ 5K]O
BSZO
>YQ D^K^_]2 9SXKV
9Y\ NO^KSV] YP KLL\O‘SK^SYX]% ]OO UOc
E4/+*1
*(’(*’*(),,.&)0W A7
5_\^YX KXN DY_^R 7O\Lc]RS\O FE6
5_\^YX KXN DY_^R 7O\Lc]RS\O 6YVVOQO?Y^^ ?KM7YXKVN >^N
>YQ B\SX^ 7K^O 4XN ESWO2 ).’(,’*(), )(2-*2))
,*,(+)&/( 8% +*+,,/&-( @ @K^SYXKV :\SN*(’(*’*(),
HSXNYa DKWZVO ^O\WSXK^ON K^ +&+(W N_O ^Y MK]SXQ QYSXQ NYaX aS^RLK\\OV&
)&
GO\^SMKV
HD(*
(&(( )&*( <B *(’(*’*(), *(’(*’*(), :E E8 ;KXN EYYV])&*( +&+( HD *(’(*’*(), *(’(*’*(), :E E8 EO\\SO\
))(
(&(( (&)( 5S^_WSXY_] WK^O\SKV(&)( (&*( 6YXM\O^O(&*( +&+( 5OX^YXS^O
*(’(*’*(), )/(( +&+( +&(( 8XN YP ;YVO
(&(( (&+( )*-- ((+( 5\OKUSXQ Y_^
+&+( ))- +&(( )&*( *&(( 1( 0(*&(( +&(( 1( 1(+&(( +&+( 0( )((
*&/(
)&*( DBE @3)( "+%*%*%+%*%+# E7B. 0, @’4 7CJ*&(( DBE @3*, ")%+%-%.%.%/# E7B. 0, @’4 7CJ+&(( DBE @3,1 ",%)(%)(%)(%),%)-# E7B. 0, @’4 7CJ
B<B8 6A@DECF6E<A@
<7
NOZ^R
RRWW]]
5S^6Y\O 6Y\O
5K\\OV D_ZZY\^>YQQON 5c
7SK&YP ZSZO
!
COWK\U]?K^O\SKV]OM^SYX
5K]O YP]OM^SYX
EYZ YP546=9<>> 78E4<>D
!7_\K^SYX
RRWWD^K\^ ^SWO
9V_]RMYVY_\
^KUOXPVYa
EYZ 5K]OEcZO YP
ZSZO7S]^KXMO
<@DE4>>4E<A@ 78E4<>D
P\YW :&>&<7
B\YTOM^ @Y&B\YTOM^ @KWO
8WZVYcO\8XQSXOO\
6YY\NSXK^O]:\Y_XN >O‘OV<XMVSXK^SYX7K^O D^K\^ON 7K^O 6YWZVO^ON
;YVO <7&8bZVY\K^Y\c ;YVO >YQ
645>8 B8C6FDD<A@ 78E4<>D
;A>8 7<4?8E8C ’ 64D<@:
H4E8C DEC<=8D
CAE4CJ 9>FD; 78E4<>D
DBE 78E4<>D
BCA:C8DDCOWK\U]7K^O ESWO ;YVO
NOZ^R NOZ^R6K]SXQ HK^O\
NOZ^R
;K\N D^\K^K 7OZ^RP\YW ^Y
RRWW
;YVONSKWO^O\
7OZ^R YPRYVO
6K]SXQNSKWO^O\
7OZ^R YPMK]SXQ
7K^O ESWO D^\SUO K^NOZ^R NOZ^R
CS]O ^Y ESWO^Y \S]O
6K]SXQ NOZ^RK^ ]^\SUO
^SWO^Y ]OKV
7OZ^R EcZO <XM\OWOX^KV LVYa MY_X^ ’
;OKNO\
@AE8D2 4VV NOZ^R] SX WO^\O]%HK^O\ ]^\SUO \S]O ^SWO SX WSX_^O]%
:8@8C4> @AE8D
4KXIWOVYOUT UL AYWGYG :KMKTJ 4KVYN:K[KR4GYZS AGSVROTM
4KYGORX9T AOYZ BKXY 9TXYGRR#
GYOUT
<=B5A0 1RR JKVYNX OT SKYWKX" GRR JOGSKYKWX OT SORROSKYWKX$AKK NKGJKW XNKKY LUW JKYGORX UL HUWOTM"
8URK 94$
4KYGORX
2RU\ 3UZTY 1TJ
>WUPKIY <U$
B3@ A3@ @?4
5SVRU^KW5TMOTKKW
3UUWJOTGYKX7WUZTJ :K[KR
5]VRUWGYUW^ 8URK :UM>WUPKIY <GSK
8URK B^VK 9TIROTGYOUT
6UWS <U$ A95F>8=:5:=7 9XXZK$@K[OXOUT <U$ ’$&+ 9XXZK 4GYK ((%’&%(&’( >GWY UL YNK 2GIN^ AURKYGTINK 7WUZV
AGSVRK @KIU[KW^
6UW JKYGORX UL GHHWK[OGYOUTX" XKK QK^VWUMWKXX GTJ \GYKW$
4OG$
:UM AYGYZX0 6OTGR
9>!EA
B1-)(/
*,$’.S =4
2ZWYUT GTJ AUZYN 4KWH^XNOWK CB3
2ZWYUT GTJ AUZYN 4KWH^XNOWK 3URRKMK;UYY ;GI4UTGRJ :YJ
:UM >WOTY 4GYK 1TJ BOSK0 ’,%&*%(&’* ’&0+(0’*
*(*&)’$-& 5" )()**-$+& < <GYOUTGR 7WOJDKWYOIGR
EA&(
&$’&
&$)&
&$.+
)$)&
*,$&.
*+$..
*+$))
*($..
5A&&’
5A&&(2&&)4&&*
5A&&+4&&,4&&-2&&.
4&&/2&’&
4&’’2&’(
&$(&
&$+&&$+&&$+&
’$&&’$&&’$(&’$(&
($&&($&&
)$&&)$&&
A>B’&’$(&
A>B(*($&&
A>B*/)$&&
’$,+
($*+
)$*+
;145 7@=C<40 BGWSGIGJGS$
;145 7@=C<40 @KJJOXN HWU\T GTMZRGW IUHHRK XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX ULHWOIQ$
;145 7@=C<40 2WU\T XGTJ^ MWG[KRR^ IRG^$ AGTJ XO_KJ LWGMSKTYXGWK LOTK YU IUGWXK$ 7WG[KR XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GWK XZHGTMZRGW YUWUZTJKJ LOTK YU IUGWXK UL SO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX$
;KJOZS JKTXK HWU\T IRG^K^ [KW^ MWG[KRR^ LOTK YU IUGWXK A1<4\OYN RU\ IUHHRK IUTYKTY$ 7WG[KR OX XZHGTMZRGW YU WUZTJKJ LOTKYU IUGWXK UL SO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX$ 3UHHRKX GWK XZHWUZTJKJ YUWUZTJKJ UL SO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX$
LWUS )$&&S JKTXK
5]VRUWGYUW^ NURK IUSVRKYK GY )$)& S$
ANKKY ’ UL ’
9\YWNOZ^R
EYNOZ^R
9V_]R^cZO
9V_]R\O^_\X
$ DOK^SXQ LVYa] YXVc&
COWK\U] 6K]SXQ HK^O\NOZ^R
6RS]OVVSXQ
9Y\W @Y& D<8IB;A>8;7C <]]_O&CO‘S]SYX @Y& )&(- <]]_O 7K^O **’)(’*()*
8[_SZWOX^EYZ 5K]O EcZO 7K^O D^K\^ON 7K^O 8XNON 6\Oa DOM^SYX DRY\SXQ ’ COWK\U]
KVV NSKWO^O\] SX WSVVSWO^\O]&RK\N ]^\K^K ^SWO SX RRWW
8XO\Qc\K^SY
EYZ 5K]O 7SKWO^O\ ESWO COMY‘O\c!
7J@4?<6 D4?B><@:
ZOXO^\K^SYX SX WW;KWWO\
@Y&
BK\^ YP ^RO 5KMRc DYVO^KXMRO :\Y_Z
EcZO CO]ZYX]O dYXOEYZ 5K]O
BSZO
>YQ D^K^_]2 9SXKV
9Y\ NO^KSV] YP KLL\O‘SK^SYX]% ]OO UOc
E4/+*1
)0’(*’*(),,.&**W A7
5_\^YX KXN DY_^R 7O\Lc]RS\O FE6
5_\^YX KXN DY_^R 7O\Lc]RS\O 6YVVOQO?Y^^ ?KM7YXKVN >^N
>YQ B\SX^ 7K^O 4XN ESWO2 ).’(,’*(), )(2-*2)1
,*,(--&/( 8% +*+,01&)( @ @K^SYXKV :\SN)1’(*’*(),
HSXNYa DKWZVO ^O\WSXK^ON K^ +&/(W N_O ^Y YL]^\_M^SYX&)&*& HSXNYa DKWZVO RYVO MYVVKZ]ON LKMU ^Y +&+(W&
GO\^SMKV
HD(+
(&(( )&*( <B )0’(*’*(), )0’(*’*(), ?? E8 ;KXN EYYV])&*( +&/( HD )1’(*’*(), )1’(*’*(), :E E8 EO\\SO\
))(
+&/(
(&(( (&)( 5S^_WSXY_] WK^O\SKV(&)( (&,( 6YXM\O^O(&,( )&+( 5OX^YXS^O)&+( +&/( :\K‘OV LKMUPSVV
)0’(*’*(), )/+( )&*( (&(( 8XN YP DRSP^)1’(*’*(), (/+( )&*( (&(( D^K\^ YP DRSP^)1’(*’*(), )++( +&/( +&(( 8XN YP ;YVO
(&(( (&,( ))(( ((+( 5\OKUSXQ Y_^
()
+&+( ))-
DB<8
+&((
)&+(
)&*( *&(( ))( 0(*&(( +&(( ))( 1(+&(( +&/( ))( -(
+&/(
7CJ7CJ7CJ
() (&(( )&-( )1 BVKSX() )&-( +&/( )1 DVY^^ON
)&*( DBE @3)* ")%*%*%+%+%,# E7B. 0, @’4 7CJ*&(( DBE @3*- ".%-%/%.%.%.# E7B. 0, @’4 7CJ+&(( DBE -(’*((WW "*-%*+%*(%/’-(# E7B. 0, +&(( 7CJ
B<B8 6A@DECF6E<A@
<7
NOZ^R
RRWW]]
5S^6Y\O 6Y\O
5K\\OV D_ZZY\^>YQQON 5c
7SK&YP ZSZO
!
COWK\U]?K^O\SKV]OM^SYX
5K]O YP]OM^SYX
EYZ YP546=9<>> 78E4<>D
!7_\K^SYX
RRWWD^K\^ ^SWO
9V_]RMYVY_\
^KUOXPVYa
EYZ 5K]OEcZO YP
ZSZO7S]^KXMO
<@DE4>>4E<A@ 78E4<>D
P\YW :&>&<7
B\YTOM^ @Y&B\YTOM^ @KWO
8WZVYcO\8XQSXOO\
6YY\NSXK^O]:\Y_XN >O‘OV<XMVSXK^SYX7K^O D^K\^ON 7K^O 6YWZVO^ON
;YVO <7&8bZVY\K^Y\c ;YVO >YQ
645>8 B8C6FDD<A@ 78E4<>D
;A>8 7<4?8E8C ’ 64D<@:
H4E8C DEC<=8D
CAE4CJ 9>FD; 78E4<>D
DBE 78E4<>D
BCA:C8DDCOWK\U]7K^O ESWO ;YVO
NOZ^R NOZ^R6K]SXQ HK^O\
NOZ^R
;K\N D^\K^K 7OZ^RP\YW ^Y
RRWW
;YVONSKWO^O\
7OZ^R YPRYVO
6K]SXQNSKWO^O\
7OZ^R YPMK]SXQ
7K^O ESWO D^\SUO K^NOZ^R NOZ^R
CS]O ^Y ESWO^Y \S]O
6K]SXQ NOZ^RK^ ]^\SUO
^SWO^Y ]OKV
7OZ^R EcZO <XM\OWOX^KV LVYa MY_X^ ’
;OKNO\
@AE8D2 4VV NOZ^R] SX WO^\O]%HK^O\ ]^\SUO \S]O ^SWO SX WSX_^O]%
:8@8C4> @AE8D
4KXIWOVYOUT UL AYWGYG :KMKTJ 4KVYN:K[KR4GYZS AGSVROTM
4KYGORX9T AOYZ BKXY 9TXYGRR#
GYOUT
<=B5A0 1RR JKVYNX OT SKYWKX" GRR JOGSKYKWX OT SORROSKYWKX$AKK NKGJKW XNKKY LUW JKYGORX UL HUWOTM"
8URK 94$
4KYGORX
2RU\ 3UZTY 1TJ
>WUPKIY <U$
B3@ A3@ @?4
5SVRU^KW5TMOTKKW
3UUWJOTGYKX7WUZTJ :K[KR
5]VRUWGYUW^ 8URK :UM>WUPKIY <GSK
8URK B^VK 9TIROTGYOUT
6UWS <U$ A95F>8=:5:=7 9XXZK$@K[OXOUT <U$ ’$&+ 9XXZK 4GYK ((%’&%(&’( >GWY UL YNK 2GIN^ AURKYGTINK 7WUZV
AGSVRK @KIU[KW^
6UW JKYGORX UL GHHWK[OGYOUTX" XKK QK^VWUMWKXX GTJ \GYKW$
4OG$
:UM AYGYZX0 6OTGR
9>!EA
B1-)(/
*,$((S =4
2ZWYUT GTJ AUZYN 4KWH^XNOWK CB3
2ZWYUT GTJ AUZYN 4KWH^XNOWK 3URRKMK;UYY ;GI4UTGRJ :YJ
:UM >WOTY 4GYK 1TJ BOSK0 ’,%&*%(&’* ’&0+(0((
*(*&++$-& 5" )()*./$’& < <GYOUTGR 7WOJDKWYOIGR
EA&)
&$’&
&$*&
’$&&
’$+&
)$-&
*,$’(
*+$.(
*+$((
**$-(
*($+(
5A&&’
5A&&(4&&)2&&*
5A&&+4&&,4&&-4&&.
4&&/2&’&
4&’’2&’(
&$(&
&$+&&$+&&$+&
’$&&’$&&’$(&’$(&
($&&($&&
)$&&)$&&
A>B’(’$(&
A>B(+($&&
A>B+&%(&&SS)$&&
’$,+
($*+
)$(.
;145 7@=C<40 BGWSGIGJGS$
;145 7@=C<40 2RGIQ [KW^ XGTJ^ GTMZRGW YU XZHGTMZRGW LOTK YUIUGWXK MWG[KR XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX UL ROSKXYUTK$
LWUS &$)&S HKIUSOTM HWU\T
;145 7@=C<40 2RGIQ IRG^K^ LOTK YU IUGWXK XGTJ XO_KJ LWGMSKTYXGTJ GTMZRGW YU XZHGTMZRGW MWG[KR XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX UL HWOIQ"GXN" IROTQKW GTJ SO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX \OYN RU\ IUHHRK IUTYKTY$3UHHRK XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GWK GTMZRGW YU XZHGTMZRGW UL HWOIQ$
;145 7@=C<40 =WGTMOXN HWU\T GTJ ROMNY MWK^ SUYYRKJ MWK^ XGTJ^MWG[KRR^ IRG^$ AGTJ XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GWK LOTK YU IUGWXK$ 7WG[KRXO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GWK XZHWUZTJKJ YU WUZTJKJ LOTK YU IUGWXK ULSO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX$
;KJOZS JKTXK HWU\T XROMNYR^ IRG^K^ [KW^ MWG[KRR^ LOTK YUIUGWXK A1<4$ 7WG[KR OX XZHWUZTJKJ YU WUZTJKJ LOTK YU IUGWXK ULSO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX$
LWUS )$&&S [KW^ JKTXK
5]VRUWGYUW^ NURK IUSVRKYK GY )$-& S$
ANKKY ’ UL ’
9\YWNOZ^R
EYNOZ^R
9V_]R^cZO
9V_]R\O^_\X
$ DOK^SXQ LVYa] YXVc&
COWK\U] 6K]SXQ HK^O\NOZ^R
6RS]OVVSXQ
9Y\W @Y& D<8IB;A>8;7C <]]_O&CO‘S]SYX @Y& )&(- <]]_O 7K^O **’)(’*()*
8[_SZWOX^EYZ 5K]O EcZO 7K^O D^K\^ON 7K^O 8XNON 6\Oa DOM^SYX DRY\SXQ ’ COWK\U]
KVV NSKWO^O\] SX WSVVSWO^\O]&RK\N ]^\K^K ^SWO SX RRWW
8XO\Qc\K^SY
EYZ 5K]O 7SKWO^O\ ESWO COMY‘O\c!
7J@4?<6 D4?B><@:
ZOXO^\K^SYX SX WW;KWWO\
@Y&
BK\^ YP ^RO 5KMRc DYVO^KXMRO :\Y_Z
EcZO CO]ZYX]O dYXOEYZ 5K]O
BSZO
>YQ D^K^_]2 9SXKV
9Y\ NO^KSV] YP KLL\O‘SK^SYX]% ]OO UOc
E4/+*1
)0’(*’*(),,.&*)W A7
5_\^YX KXN DY_^R 7O\Lc]RS\O FE6
5_\^YX KXN DY_^R 7O\Lc]RS\O 6YVVOQO?Y^^ ?KM7YXKVN >^N
>YQ B\SX^ 7K^O 4XN ESWO2 ).’(,’*(), )(2-*2*0
,*,(,.&*( 8% +*+,-.&/( @ @K^SYXKV :\SN)1’(*’*(),
HSXNYa DKWZVO ^O\WSXK^ON K^ +&+(W N_O ^Y YL]^\_M^SYX&)&
GO\^SMKV
HD(,
(&(( )&*( <B )0’(*’*(), )0’(*’*(), ?? E8 ;KXN EYYV])&*( +&+( HD )1’(*’*(), )1’(*’*(), :E E8 EO\\SO\
))(
(&(( (&)( 5S^_WSXY_] WK^O\SKV(&)( (&+( 6YXM\O^O(&+( +&+( 5OX^YXS^O
)0’(*’*(), )/+( )&*( (&(( 8XN YP DRSP^)1’(*’*(), (/+( )&*( (&(( D^K\^ YP DRSP^)1’(*’*(), )-)- +&+( +&(( 8XN YP ;YVO
(&(( (&,( )+)- ((+( 5\OKUSXQ Y_^
+&+( ))- +&(( )&*( *&(( ))( 0(*&(( +&(( ))( 1(+&(( +&+( ))( *(
7CJ7CJ7CJ
)&*( DBE @3, ")%)%)%)%)%)# E7B. 0, @’4 7CJ*&(( DBE @3*- "*%-%-%.%/%/# E7B. 0, *&(( 7CJ+&(( DBE -(’1(WW "*-%*/%*+’)-# E7B. 0, +&(( 7CJ
B<B8 6A@DECF6E<A@
<7
NOZ^R
RRWW]]
5S^6Y\O 6Y\O
5K\\OV D_ZZY\^>YQQON 5c
7SK&YP ZSZO
!
COWK\U]?K^O\SKV]OM^SYX
5K]O YP]OM^SYX
EYZ YP546=9<>> 78E4<>D
!7_\K^SYX
RRWWD^K\^ ^SWO
9V_]RMYVY_\
^KUOXPVYa
EYZ 5K]OEcZO YP
ZSZO7S]^KXMO
<@DE4>>4E<A@ 78E4<>D
P\YW :&>&<7
B\YTOM^ @Y&B\YTOM^ @KWO
8WZVYcO\8XQSXOO\
6YY\NSXK^O]:\Y_XN >O‘OV<XMVSXK^SYX7K^O D^K\^ON 7K^O 6YWZVO^ON
;YVO <7&8bZVY\K^Y\c ;YVO >YQ
645>8 B8C6FDD<A@ 78E4<>D
;A>8 7<4?8E8C ’ 64D<@:
H4E8C DEC<=8D
CAE4CJ 9>FD; 78E4<>D
DBE 78E4<>D
BCA:C8DDCOWK\U]7K^O ESWO ;YVO
NOZ^R NOZ^R6K]SXQ HK^O\
NOZ^R
;K\N D^\K^K 7OZ^RP\YW ^Y
RRWW
;YVONSKWO^O\
7OZ^R YPRYVO
6K]SXQNSKWO^O\
7OZ^R YPMK]SXQ
7K^O ESWO D^\SUO K^NOZ^R NOZ^R
CS]O ^Y ESWO^Y \S]O
6K]SXQ NOZ^RK^ ]^\SUO
^SWO^Y ]OKV
7OZ^R EcZO <XM\OWOX^KV LVYa MY_X^ ’
;OKNO\
@AE8D2 4VV NOZ^R] SX WO^\O]%HK^O\ ]^\SUO \S]O ^SWO SX WSX_^O]%
:8@8C4> @AE8D
4KXIWOVYOUT UL AYWGYG :KMKTJ 4KVYN:K[KR4GYZS AGSVROTM
4KYGORX9T AOYZ BKXY 9TXYGRR#
GYOUT
<=B5A0 1RR JKVYNX OT SKYWKX" GRR JOGSKYKWX OT SORROSKYWKX$AKK NKGJKW XNKKY LUW JKYGORX UL HUWOTM"
8URK 94$
4KYGORX
2RU\ 3UZTY 1TJ
>WUPKIY <U$
B3@ A3@ @?4
5SVRU^KW5TMOTKKW
3UUWJOTGYKX7WUZTJ :K[KR
5]VRUWGYUW^ 8URK :UM>WUPKIY <GSK
8URK B^VK 9TIROTGYOUT
6UWS <U$ A95F>8=:5:=7 9XXZK$@K[OXOUT <U$ ’$&+ 9XXZK 4GYK ((%’&%(&’( >GWY UL YNK 2GIN^ AURKYGTINK 7WUZV
AGSVRK @KIU[KW^
6UW JKYGORX UL GHHWK[OGYOUTX" XKK QK^VWUMWKXX GTJ \GYKW$
4OG$
:UM AYGYZX0 6OTGR
9>!EA
B1-)(/
*,$(’S =4
2ZWYUT GTJ AUZYN 4KWH^XNOWK CB3
2ZWYUT GTJ AUZYN 4KWH^XNOWK 3URRKMK;UYY ;GI4UTGRJ :YJ
:UM >WOTY 4GYK 1TJ BOSK0 ’,%&*%(&’* ’&0+(0)&
*(*&*,$(& 5" )()*+,$-& < <GYOUTGR 7WOJDKWYOIGR
EA&*
&$’&&$(&
&$*&
’$&&
’$+&
)$)&
*,$’’*,$&’
*+$.’
*+$(’
**$-’
*($/’
5A&&’
5A&&(4&&)2&&*
5A&&+4&&,4&&-2&&.
4&&/2&’&
4&’’2&’(
&$(&
&$+&&$+&&$+&
’$&&’$&&’$(&’$(&
($&&($&&
)$&&)$&&
A>B*’$(&
A>B(+($&&
A>B+&%/&SS)$&&
’$,+
($*+
)$’,
;145 7@=C<40 BGWSGIGJGS$
;145 7@=C<40 6OWKHWOIQ$
;145 7@=C<40 2RGIQ IRG^K^ MWG[KRR^ LOTK YU IUGWXK XGTJ XO_KJLWGMSKTYX \OYN RU\ IUHHRK IUTYKTY$ 7WG[KR XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GWKGTMZRGW YU XZHGTMZRGW LOTK YU IUGWXK UL HWOIQ" XRGM" IROTQKWGTJ SO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX$ AGTJ XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GWK LOTK YUIUGWXK$ 3UHHRK XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GWK GTMZRGW YU XZHGTMZRGW ULHWOIQ$
;145 7@=C<40 2RGIQ MWG[KRR^ XORY^ LOTK YU IUGWXK XGTJ XO_KJLWGMSKTYX$ 7WG[KR XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GWK XZHWUZTJKJ YU WUZTJKJLOTK YU IUGWXK UL SO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX$
;145 7@=C<40 2WU\T IRG^K^ LOTK YU IUGWXK XGTJ XO_KJ LWGMSKTYXGTJ XZHWUZTJKJ YU WUZTJKJ LOTK YU IUGWXK MWG[KR XO_KJLWGMSKTYX UL SO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX$
;KJOZS JKTXK HWU\T IRG^K^ LOTK YU IUGWXK A1<4 GTJ XZHWUZTJKJYU WUZTJKJ LOTK YU IUGWXK 7@1D5: UL SO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX$
LWUS )$&&S [KW^ JKTXK
5]VRUWGYUW^ NURK IUSVRKYK GY )$)& S$
ANKKY ’ UL ’
9\YWNOZ^R
EYNOZ^R
9V_]R^cZO
9V_]R\O^_\X
$ DOK^SXQ LVYa] YXVc&
COWK\U] 6K]SXQ HK^O\NOZ^R
6RS]OVVSXQ
9Y\W @Y& D<8IB;A>8;7C <]]_O&CO‘S]SYX @Y& )&(- <]]_O 7K^O **’)(’*()*
8[_SZWOX^EYZ 5K]O EcZO 7K^O D^K\^ON 7K^O 8XNON 6\Oa DOM^SYX DRY\SXQ ’ COWK\U]
KVV NSKWO^O\] SX WSVVSWO^\O]&RK\N ]^\K^K ^SWO SX RRWW
8XO\Qc\K^SY
EYZ 5K]O 7SKWO^O\ ESWO COMY‘O\c!
7J@4?<6 D4?B><@:
ZOXO^\K^SYX SX WW;KWWO\
@Y&
BK\^ YP ^RO 5KMRc DYVO^KXMRO :\Y_Z
EcZO CO]ZYX]O dYXOEYZ 5K]O
BSZO
>YQ D^K^_]2 9SXKV
9Y\ NO^KSV] YP KLL\O‘SK^SYX]% ]OO UOc
E4/+*1
)1’(*’*(),,.&+/W A7
5_\^YX KXN DY_^R 7O\Lc]RS\O FE6
5_\^YX KXN DY_^R 7O\Lc]RS\O 6YVVOQO?Y^^ ?KM7YXKVN >^N
>YQ B\SX^ 7K^O 4XN ESWO2 ).’(,’*(), )(2-*2+-
,*,(+0&,( 8% +*+-*,&+( @ @K^SYXKV :\SN*(’(*’*(),
HSXNYa DKWZVO ^O\WSXK^ON K^ -&((W N_O ^Y _XKLVO ^Y Z\YQ\O]]MK]SXQ ZK]^ ,&((W& 7\SVVON ^Y -&((W L_^ MYVVKZ]ON LKMU ^Y ,&-(W&
)&
GO\^SMKV
HD(-
(&(( )&*( <B )1’(*’*(), )1’(*’*(), :E E8 ;KXN EYYV])&*( -&(( HD *(’(*’*(), *(’(*’*(), :E E8 EO\\SO\
))(
(&(( (&)( 5S^_WSXY_] WK^O\SKV(&)( (&+( 6YXM\O^O(&+( -&(( 5OX^YXS^O
)1’(*’*(), )/+( )&*( (&(( 8XN YP DRSP^*(’(*’*(), (/+( )&*( (&(( D^K\^ YP DRSP^*(’(*’*(), )*(( -&(( ,&(( 8XN YP ;YVO
(&(( )&(( )--( ((,( 5\OKUSXQ Y_^
-&(( ))- ,&(( )&*( *&(( 1( .+*&(( +&(( 1( /(+&(( ,&(( 0( ,(,&(( -&(( 0( ,(
*&0(7CJ@C
*&(( DBE -(’*.-WW ")%)%0%)*%)0%)*’,(# E7B. 0, @’4 7CJ+&(( DBE @3*/ ")-%)(%))%.%-%-# E7B. 0, +&(( *&0(,&(( DBE @3,( ")+%)*%))%1%)(%)(# E7B. 0, ,&(( *&0(
B<B8 6A@DECF6E<A@
<7
NOZ^R
RRWW]]
5S^6Y\O 6Y\O
5K\\OV D_ZZY\^>YQQON 5c
7SK&YP ZSZO
!
COWK\U]?K^O\SKV]OM^SYX
5K]O YP]OM^SYX
EYZ YP546=9<>> 78E4<>D
!7_\K^SYX
RRWWD^K\^ ^SWO
9V_]RMYVY_\
^KUOXPVYa
EYZ 5K]OEcZO YP
ZSZO7S]^KXMO
<@DE4>>4E<A@ 78E4<>D
P\YW :&>&<7
B\YTOM^ @Y&B\YTOM^ @KWO
8WZVYcO\8XQSXOO\
6YY\NSXK^O]:\Y_XN >O‘OV<XMVSXK^SYX7K^O D^K\^ON 7K^O 6YWZVO^ON
;YVO <7&8bZVY\K^Y\c ;YVO >YQ
645>8 B8C6FDD<A@ 78E4<>D
;A>8 7<4?8E8C ’ 64D<@:
H4E8C DEC<=8D
CAE4CJ 9>FD; 78E4<>D
DBE 78E4<>D
BCA:C8DDCOWK\U]7K^O ESWO ;YVO
NOZ^R NOZ^R6K]SXQ HK^O\
NOZ^R
;K\N D^\K^K 7OZ^RP\YW ^Y
RRWW
;YVONSKWO^O\
7OZ^R YPRYVO
6K]SXQNSKWO^O\
7OZ^R YPMK]SXQ
7K^O ESWO D^\SUO K^NOZ^R NOZ^R
CS]O ^Y ESWO^Y \S]O
6K]SXQ NOZ^RK^ ]^\SUO
^SWO^Y ]OKV
7OZ^R EcZO <XM\OWOX^KV LVYa MY_X^ ’
;OKNO\
@AE8D2 4VV NOZ^R] SX WO^\O]%HK^O\ ]^\SUO \S]O ^SWO SX WSX_^O]%
:8@8C4> @AE8D
4KXIWOVYOUT UL AYWGYG :KMKTJ 4KVYN:K[KR4GYZS AGSVROTM
4KYGORX9T AOYZ BKXY 9TXYGRR#
GYOUT
<=B5A0 1RR JKVYNX OT SKYWKX" GRR JOGSKYKWX OT SORROSKYWKX$AKK NKGJKW XNKKY LUW JKYGORX UL HUWOTM"
8URK 94$
4KYGORX
2RU\ 3UZTY 1TJ
>WUPKIY <U$
B3@ A3@ @?4
5SVRU^KW5TMOTKKW
3UUWJOTGYKX7WUZTJ :K[KR
5]VRUWGYUW^ 8URK :UM>WUPKIY <GSK
8URK B^VK 9TIROTGYOUT
6UWS <U$ A95F>8=:5:=7 9XXZK$@K[OXOUT <U$ ’$&+ 9XXZK 4GYK ((%’&%(&’( >GWY UL YNK 2GIN^ AURKYGTINK 7WUZV
AGSVRK @KIU[KW^
6UW JKYGORX UL GHHWK[OGYOUTX" XKK QK^VWUMWKXX GTJ \GYKW$
4OG$
:UM AYGYZX0 6OTGR
9>!EA
B1-)(/
*,$)-S =4
2ZWYUT GTJ AUZYN 4KWH^XNOWK CB3
2ZWYUT GTJ AUZYN 4KWH^XNOWK 3URRKMK;UYY ;GI4UTGRJ :YJ
:UM >WOTY 4GYK 1TJ BOSK0 ’,%&*%(&’* ’&0+(0*&
*(*&).$*& 5" )()+(*$)& < <GYOUTGR 7WOJDKWYOIGR
EA&+
&$’&
&$)&
($)&
+$&&
*,$(-
*,$&-
**$&-
*’$)-
5A&&’
5A&&(2&&)4&&*
5A&&+4&&,4&&-2&&.
4&&/5A&’&2&’’
4&’(5A&’)2&’*
4&’+2&’,
&$(&
&$+&&$+&&$+&
’$&&’$&&’$(&’$(&
($&&($&&($&&
)$&&)$&&)$&&
*$&&*$&&
A>B+&%(,+SS($&&
A>B(-)$&&
A>B*&*$&&
($*(
)$*+
*$*+
;145 7@=C<40 BGWSGIGJGS$
;145 7@=C<40 2WU\T XGTJ^ GTMZRGW YU XZHGTMZRGW LOTK YU IUGWXKMWG[KR XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX UL ROSKXYUTK$ AGTJ XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GWKLOTK YU IUGWXK$
;145 7@=C<40 4GWQ HWU\T IRG^K^ [KW^ XGTJ^ GTMZRGW YUXZHGTMZRGW LOTK YU IUGWXK MWG[KR XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX UL HWOIQ"XGTJXYUTK" GXN GTJ IROTQKW \OYN SKJOZS RUIGRR^ NOMN IUHHRKIUTYKTY$ AGTJ XO_KJ LWGMSKTYX GWK LOTK YU IUGWXK$ 3UHHRK XO_KJLWGMSKTYX GWK GTMZRGW UL HWOIQ$
LWUS ’$&&S RU\ IUHHRK IUTYKTY
;KJOZS JKTXK HWU\T IRG^K^ [KW^ XGTJ^ XZHGTMZRGW YU WUZTJKJLOTK YU IUGWXK 7@1D5: UL SO]KJ ROYNURUMOKX$ AGTJ OX LOTK YUIUGWXK$
LWUS *$&&S JKTXK
5]VRUWGYUW^ NURK IUSVRKYK GY +$&& S$
ANKKY ’ UL ’
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION AExploratory Hole Records and Field Data
IN SITU TEST DATA
section title sheets x25.indd 9 14/03/2013 16:17
Test no Chainage
Initial Depth m Weather
Remarks
Recorded by:
Date:
Form No. Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Record of Results for
TRL DCP (Dynamic
Cone Penetrometer)
Hole ID
BH02Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
21/01/2014
Client Burton & South Derbyshire College
2.03 Issue Date
20
20
20
1
0.00
Reading
mm
Difference
mm
20
Number of blows Total blows
15
13
Tim Emson
Difference
mm
0
14
290 537
98
3
35 145
5 5
5
20
21
5
112
5
10 115
25/02/2014
Number of blows Total blowsReading
mm
0 0
5 15 128
10
20 133
7
5 25 138 5
10 55 164 9
10 45 155 10
10 75 197 23
10 65 174 10
5 90 265 22
10 85 243 46
5 100 300 20
5 95 280 15
10 120 327 17
10 110 310 10
10 140 354 17
10 130 337 10
10 160 364 6
10 150 358 4
20 200 408 23
20 180 385 21
20 240 492 56
20 220 436 28
20
20 270 522
10 250 505
20 330 586 29
20 310 557 20
585
390
370
510
490
470
450
430
13
350
590 1331 725
15
70
16
17
5
5
40
11
15
18
10
94
18
9110
560
550
1049
1143
10
10
575
570
540 850
888
958
38
70
53
63
606
626
647
665
1196
1259
580
20
530
676
691
709
74020
20
5
20
20
810
725
410
20
SE-IST-F-014
20
Test no Chainage
Initial Depth m Weather
Remarks
Recorded by:
Date:
Form No. Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group2.03 Issue Date 21/01/2014
Tim Emson
25/02/2014
0.00
Client Burton & South Derbyshire College
1
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Record of Results for
TRL DCP (Dynamic
Cone Penetrometer)
Hole ID
BH02Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
SE-IST-F-015
Layer 1 CBR value 68, Layer 2 CBR value 250, Layer 3 CBR value 350, Layer 4 CBR value 24
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Dep
th in
mm
(cor
rect
ed b
y ze
ro r
eadi
ng o
f DC
P)
Total number of blows
Test no Chainage
Initial Depth m Weather
Remarks
Recorded by:
Date:
Form No. Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Dry
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Record of Results for
TRL DCP (Dynamic
Cone Penetrometer)
Hole ID
BH05Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
21/01/2014
Client Burton & South Derbyshire College
2.03 Issue Date
1
0.00
Reading
mm
Difference
mmNumber of blows Total blows
14
Tim Emson
Difference
mm
0
39
75
17
120 189
20 20
20
20
114
13
40 131
27/02/2014
Number of blows Total blowsReading
mm
0 0
20 60 145
20
80 158
19
20 100 170 12
20 160 222 15
20 140 207 18
20 200 259 21
20 180 238 16
20 240 303 19
20 220 284 25
20 280 348 23
20 260 325 22
20 320 411 37
20 300 374 26
20 360 543 76
20 340 467 56
10 380 784 144
10 370 640 97
5 395 1046 136
10 390 910 126
1 397 1171 36
1 396 1135 89
1 399 1230
1 398 1198 27
32
SE-IST-F-014
Test no Chainage
Initial Depth m Weather
Remarks
Recorded by:
Date:
Form No. Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Dry
2.03 Issue Date 21/01/2014
Tim Emson
27/02/2014
0.00
Client Burton & South Derbyshire College
1
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Record of Results for
TRL DCP (Dynamic
Cone Penetrometer)
Hole ID
BH05Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
SE-IST-F-015
Layer 1 CBR value 400, Layer 2 CBR value 280, Layer 3 CBR value 21, Layer 4 CBR value 5.3
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Dep
th in
mm
(cor
rect
ed b
y ze
ro r
eadi
ng o
f DC
P)
Total number of blows
Test no Chainage
Initial Depth m Weather
Remarks
Recorded by:
Date:
Form No. Revision No.SE-IST-F-014
14
20
1 307 1245 32
1
1 305 1186
1 304 1172
1 303 1152 21
1 302 1131 18
1 301 1113 16
1 300 1097 21
1 299 1076 19
1 298 1057 24
1 297 1033 26
1 296 1007 30
5 295 977 196
20 290 781 175
20 270 606 28
20 250 578 210
20 230 368 103
20 210 265 58
20 190 207 28
20 170 179 14
20 150 165 15
20 130 150 15
70 118
12
20 90 123 5
25/02/2014
Number of blows Total blowsReading
mm
0 0
20 50 110
20
10 10
20
20
101
8
30 105
Tim Emson
Difference
mm
0
26
306 1213
75
4
110 135
1
0.00
Reading
mm
Difference
mmNumber of blows Total blows
27
5
21/01/2014
Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
2.03 Issue Date
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Record of Results for
TRL DCP (Dynamic
Cone Penetrometer)
Hole ID
WS03Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Test no Chainage
Initial Depth m Weather
Remarks
Recorded by:
Date:
Form No. Revision No.SE-IST-F-015
Layer 1 CBR value 440, Layer 2 CBR value 25, Layer 3 CBR value 12
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Record of Results for
TRL DCP (Dynamic
Cone Penetrometer)
Hole ID
WS03Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
0.00
Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
1
2.03 Issue Date 21/01/2014
Tim Emson
25/02/2014
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Dep
th in
mm
(cor
rect
ed b
y ze
ro r
eadi
ng o
f DC
P)
Total number of blows
Instrument used: PID FID
Limits of detection PID FID
Last calibrated PID FID
Tested by:
Form No.
25/05/2013
Tim Emson
SE-EMS-F-001 Issue No. 1 Revision No. 04 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Mini Rae 2000
BH01 2.00 ES 008 01 21/02/2014 0.0
0.0
BH01 1.00 ES 004 01 21/02/2014 0.2
BH01 0.50 ES 002 01 21/02/2014
BH01 0.20 ES 001 01 21/02/2014 0.0
FID Remarks
m ppm ppm
Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
Hole IDHeadspace
Sample Depth
Sample
Type
Sample
Ref.
Test
NumberTest Date PID
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photo Ionisation and
Flame Ionisation
Results
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Figure No.
Instrument used: PID FID
Limits of detection PID FID
Last calibrated PID FID
Tested by:
Form No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche GroupIssue No. 1 Revision No. 04 Issue Date
25/05/2013
Sample
Ref.
Test
Number
0.20
0.50
01
01
001
003
ES
ES
Mini Rae 2000
BH02 ES 009 012.00 0.0
011.00 18/02/2014 0.0
18/02/2014BH02 0.0
BH02 ES 005
27/01/2014
Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
Tim Emson
BH02 0.0
18/02/2014
Test Date PID
ppm
FID
ppm
Project No. TA7329
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photo Ionisation and
Flame Ionisation
ResultsEngineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Figure No.
SE-EMS-F-001
RemarksHole IDHeadspace
Sample Depth
m
Sample
Type
18/02/2014
Instrument used: PID FID
Limits of detection PID FID
Last calibrated PID FID
Tested by:
Form No.
25/05/2013
Tim Emson
SE-EMS-F-001 Issue No. 1 Revision No. 04 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Mini Rae 2000
BH03 1.00 ES 005 01 19/02/2014 0.0
0.0
BH03 0.50 ES 003 01 19/02/2014 0.0
BH03 0.30 ES 002 01 19/02/2014
BH03 0.10 ES 001 01 19/02/2014 0.0
FID Remarks
m ppm ppm
Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
Hole IDHeadspace
Sample Depth
Sample
Type
Sample
Ref.
Test
NumberTest Date PID
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photo Ionisation and
Flame Ionisation
Results
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Figure No.
Instrument used: PID FID
Limits of detection PID FID
Last calibrated PID FID
Tested by:
Form No.
25/05/2013
Tim Emson
SE-EMS-F-001 Issue No. 1 Revision No. 04 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Mini Rae 2000
BH04 1.50 ES 007 01 19/02/2014 0.1
0.1
BH04 1.00 ES 004 01 19/02/2014 0.5
BH04 0.50 ES 002 01 19/02/2014
BH04 0.20 ES 001 01 19/02/2014 0.0
FID Remarks
m ppm ppm
Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
Hole IDHeadspace
Sample Depth
Sample
Type
Sample
Ref.
Test
NumberTest Date PID
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photo Ionisation and
Flame Ionisation
Results
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Figure No.
Instrument used: PID FID
Limits of detection PID FID
Last calibrated PID FID
Tested by:
Form No.
25/05/2013
Tim Emson
SE-EMS-F-001 Issue No. 1 Revision No. 04 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Mini Rae 2000
BH05 1.00 ES 005 01 26/02/2014 0.0
0.0
BH05 0.50 ES 003 01 26/02/2014 0.0
BH05 0.20 ES 002 01 26/02/2014
BH05 0.10 ES 001 01 26/02/2014 0.0
FID Remarks
m ppm ppm
Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
Hole IDHeadspace
Sample Depth
Sample
Type
Sample
Ref.
Test
NumberTest Date PID
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photo Ionisation and
Flame Ionisation
Results
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Figure No.
Instrument used: PID FID
Limits of detection PID FID
Last calibrated PID FID
Tested by:
Form No.
25/05/2013
Tim Emson
SE-EMS-F-001 Issue No. 1 Revision No. 04 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Mini Rae 2000
WS01 1.20 ES 007 01 18/02/2014 21.8
0.0
WS01 1.00 ES 005 01 18/02/2014 0.0
WS01 0.50 ES 002 01 18/02/2014
WS01 0.20 ES 001 01 18/02/2014 0.0
FID Remarks
m ppm ppm
Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
Hole IDHeadspace
Sample Depth
Sample
Type
Sample
Ref.
Test
NumberTest Date PID
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photo Ionisation and
Flame Ionisation
Results
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Figure No.
Instrument used: PID FID
Limits of detection PID FID
Last calibrated PID FID
Tested by:
Form No.
25/05/2013
Tim Emson
SE-EMS-F-001 Issue No. 1 Revision No. 04 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Mini Rae 2000
0.0
WS02 1.00 ES 005 01 20/02/2014 0.3
WS02 0.50 ES 002 01 20/02/2014
WS02 0.20 ES 001 01 20/02/2014 0.0
FID Remarks
m ppm ppm
Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
Hole IDHeadspace
Sample Depth
Sample
Type
Sample
Ref.
Test
NumberTest Date PID
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photo Ionisation and
Flame Ionisation
Results
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Figure No.
Instrument used: PID FID
Limits of detection PID FID
Last calibrated PID FID
Tested by:
Form No.
25/05/2013
Tim Emson
SE-EMS-F-001 Issue No. 1 Revision No. 04 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Mini Rae 2000
0.0
WS03 1.00 ES 005 01 18/02/2014 0.0
WS03 0.50 ES 002 01 18/02/2014
WS03 0.20 ES 001 01 18/02/2014 0.0
FID Remarks
m ppm ppm
Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
Hole IDHeadspace
Sample Depth
Sample
Type
Sample
Ref.
Test
NumberTest Date PID
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photo Ionisation and
Flame Ionisation
Results
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Figure No.
Instrument used: PID FID
Limits of detection PID FID
Last calibrated PID FID
Tested by:
Form No.
25/05/2013
Tim Emson
SE-EMS-F-001 Issue No. 1 Revision No. 04 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Mini Rae 2000
0.0
WS04 1.00 ES 005 01 18/02/2014 0.0
WS04 0.50 ES 002 01 18/02/2014
WS04 0.20 ES 001 01 18/02/2014 0.0
FID Remarks
m ppm ppm
Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
Hole IDHeadspace
Sample Depth
Sample
Type
Sample
Ref.
Test
NumberTest Date PID
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photo Ionisation and
Flame Ionisation
Results
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Figure No.
Instrument used: PID FID
Limits of detection PID FID
Last calibrated PID FID
Tested by:
Form No.
25/05/2013
Tim Emson
SE-EMS-F-001 Issue No. 1 Revision No. 04 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Mini Rae 2000
WS05 3.00 ES 013 01 20/02/2014 0.0
WS05 2.00 ES 010 01 20/02/2014 0.0
0.0
WS05 1.00 ES 005 01 20/02/2014 0.0
WS05 0.50 ES 002 01 20/02/2014
WS05 0.20 ES 001 01 20/02/2014 0.0
FID Remarks
m ppm ppm
Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
Hole IDHeadspace
Sample Depth
Sample
Type
Sample
Ref.
Test
NumberTest Date PID
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photo Ionisation and
Flame Ionisation
Results
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Figure No.
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION AExploratory Hole Records and Field Data
GROUNDWATER / GAS MONITORINGRESULTS
section title sheets x25.indd 13 14/03/2013 16:17
Recorded By: Checked By: Approved By:
Date: Date: Date:
Form No. IssueNo.RevisionNo Issue Date Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
14/04/2014 15/04/2014 15/04/2014
SE-PGR-F-007 3.04 26/07/2013
Tim.Emson Ian.Swain Ian.Swain
Not sealed SAND and GRAVEL Medium
Not sealed SAND and GRAVEL Medium
BH05 26/02/2014 1100 4.50 3.20 20 4.50
Not sealed Clayey sandy GRAVEL Medium
BH04 19/02/2014 1445 3.50 3.00 20 3.50
Not sealed SAND and GRAVEL Medium
BH02 18/02/2014 1315 4.00 3.00 15 4.00
m
BH01 21/02/2014 1000 2.00 1.80 15 2.00
Casing
depth to
seal flow
Stratum Flow rate remarks
dd/mm/yyyy hhmm m m mins m
01Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
Hole ID Date TimeStrike at
depth
Rise to
depth
Time
taken to
rise
Casing
depth at
strike
time
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Groundwater Inflows
Recorded in
Exploratory HolesProject No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Table No.
Recorded by: Checked by: Approved by:
Date: Date: Date:
Form No.
Ian.Swain
14/04/2014
05/03/2014
05/03/2014
05/03/2014
05/03/2014
05/03/2014
05/03/2014
Depth to base
of pipe
m
Monitoring
point depth
m
5.00
ID
SP
SP
6.50
7.70
6.20
7.50
14:10
15:16
13:45
13:05
Date
dd/mm/yyyy
11/03/2014
11/03/2014
11/03/2014
11/03/2014
11/03/2014
11/03/2014
11/03/2014
Time
hh:mm
15:35
15:02
15:20
15:25
14:58
15:05
15:10
m
2.65
2.70
2.84
2.70
Date
dd/mm/yyyy
19/03/2014
19/03/2014
SP
4.45
3.70 01 2.7514:3019/03/20143.20
14:38
2.652.54
2.49 19/03/2014
19/03/2014
14:502.60
2.70
Table No.
02
Reading
2.72
hh:mm m
15:10
Time
Recorded Water Level
Reading
SP
01
SP
Burton and South Derbyshire College
SPIE=Piezometer, SP=Standpipe
2.7014:452.60
5.20
Reading
BH01
BH02
COMMENTS
Exploratory Hole ID
WS03
Installation Details
2.55
2.63
2.66
6.00
6.00
4.00
3.70
016.20
01
SP
SP
m
01
TypeTime
hh:mm
6.20 01
01
05/03/2014
Date
dd/mm/yyyy
14:54
13:21
14:10
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Groundwater
Readings For
InstallationsProject No.
Engineer
TA7329
Mott MacDonald Ltd
Client
2.05
NOTES:
For multiple installations at the same depth, use different Installation IDs. Otherwise, the field is optional.
Monitoring point depth for piezometers = tip depth, for standpipes = base of response zone
2.76
2.65
BH03
BH04
BH05
WS01
2.802.72 15:45
14:59
19/03/2014
19/03/2014
Issue.Revision No.SE-PGR-F-008 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Various
10/04/2014
24/01/2014Issue Date
14/04/2014
Ian.Swain
Recorded by: Checked by: Approved by:
Date: Date: Date:
Form No.
10/04/2014 14/04/2014 14/04/2014
SE-PGR-F-008 Issue.Revision No. 2.05 Issue Date 24/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Various Ian.Swain Ian.Swain
10/04/2014 08:15 2.7027/03/2014 10:10 2.74 02/04/2014 10:40 2.76
11:15 2.72 10/04/2014 08:20 2.69
WS03 SP 3.70 3.70 01
2.62
WS01 SP 4.00 4.45 01 27/03/2014 10:15 2.73 02/04/2014
2.58 02/04/2014 11:20 2.60 10/04/2014 08:00
10/04/2014 08:50 2.69
BH05 SP 6.00 6.20 01 27/03/2014 10:00
27/03/2014 10:30 2.68 02/04/2014 10:30 2.70
11:00 2.86 10/04/2014 08:30 2.81
BH04 SP 6.00 6.20 01
2.70
BH03 SP 7.50 7.70 01 27/03/2014 10:20 2.83 02/04/2014
2.73 02/04/2014 10:06 2.72 10/04/2014 08:10
10/04/2014 08:40 2.73
BH02 SP 6.20 6.50 01 27/03/2014 10:35
27/03/2014 10:25 2.72 02/04/2014 10:00 2.75
hh:mm m dd/mm/yyyy hh:mm m
BH01 SP 5.00 5.20 01
Time Reading Date Time Reading
m m dd/mm/yyyy hh:mm m
Monitoring
point depth
IDDate Time Reading Date
dd/mm/yyyy
Monitoring point depth for piezometers = tip depth, for standpipes = base of response zone
COMMENTS
Exploratory Hole ID
Installation Details Recorded Water Level
Type
Depth to base
of pipe
02Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
NOTES: SPIE=Piezometer, SP=Standpipe
For multiple installations at the same depth, use different Installation IDs. Otherwise, the field is optional.
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Groundwater
Readings For
InstallationsProject No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Table No.
Notes Type of Sampling Point:
For double gas valves, record valves separately, using separate Monitoring Point ID
m
m m
m
2.55 2.65 2.72 2.72 2.75 2.73
1014 1028 1014 1008 1011 1016
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
0.7 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4
18.8 20.3 20.7 20.1 20.4 20.4
3 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
0.7 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1
18.8 20.4 20.7 20.1 20.4 20.4
3 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Equipment Serial Number
Monitored By
Comments
Form No. Revision No.SE-EMS-F-002 2.06 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
30/01/2014
TE CE SB CE CE CE
Equipment Last Calibrated 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014
G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347
Fine
Equipment Type GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA2000+ GA2000+ GA5000
Weather Conditions: Fine Sunny Sunny Sunny Rain
H2S: Steady State ppm 1
Gas Flow l/hr 0.1
O2: Steady State %v/v 0.1
CO: Steady State ppm 1
CH4: Steady State %v/v 0.1
CO2: Steady State %v/v 0.1
10:27:00 10:03:00 08:43:00
CH4: (LEL) Steady State % 1
Time of Steady readings hh:mm:ss N/A 14:57:00 15:37:00 15:12:00
CO: Peak ppm 1
H2S: Peak ppm 1
CO2: Peak %v/v 0.1
O2: Minimum %v/v 0.1
CH4: (LEL) Peak % 1
CH4: Peak %v/v 0.1
14:55:00 15:36:00 15:11:00 10:26:00 10:02:00 08:42:00
Base depth of installation at
time of monitoringm 0.01
Time of 'Peak' readings hh:mm:ss N/A
Atmospheric pressure mb 1
Relative pressure mb 1
08:40:00
Water Level m 0.01
Time of initial readings hh:mm:ss
7 8
N/A 14:54:00 15:35:00 15:10:00
19/03/2014 27/03/2014
10:25:00 10:00:00
Detection
Limit
Monitoring round no.
02/04/2014 10/04/2014
4 5 6
Top of response zone 1.80 Base of response zone
Date dd/mm/yyyy N/A 05/03/2014 11/03/2014
Measured Parameter Units
5.00
03Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
GMP = Gas Monitoring Point, GMP+SP = Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe, GMP+SPIE
= Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe Piezometer, GMP+GWMP = Gas Monitoring Point
and Groundwater Monitoring Point
N/A N/A 1 2 3
Distance to monitoring point 5.20 Monitoring Point ID 01
5.20
Well Type SP+GMP Initial base depth of installation
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Record Of Gas
Monitoring
Hole ID
BH01Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Table No.
Notes Type of Sampling Point:
For double gas valves, record valves separately, using separate Monitoring Point ID
m
m m
m
2.60 2.70 2.70 2.73 2.72 2.70
1014 1028 1014 1008 1009 1016
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
6.20 6.20 6.20 6.20 6.20 6.20
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
0.4 3.5 0.5 1.2 0.8 2.8
20.1 17.0 19.9 19.5 19.3 19.4
4 <1 7 1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
0.3 3.4 0.5 1.0 0.7 1.3
20.2 17.6 20.0 19.6 19.9 19.8
3 <1 1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 -0.3 0.2 <0.1 <0.1
Equipment Serial Number
Monitored By
Comments
Form No. Revision No.SE-EMS-F-002 2.06 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
30/01/2014
TE CE SB CE CE CE
Equipment Last Calibrated 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014
G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347
Fine
Equipment Type GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA2000+ GA5000
Weather Conditions: Fine Sunny Sunny Sunny Cloud
H2S: Steady State ppm 1
Gas Flow l/hr 0.1
O2: Steady State %v/v 0.1
CO: Steady State ppm 1
CH4: Steady State %v/v 0.1
CO2: Steady State %v/v 0.1
10:38:00 10:09:00 08:13:00
CH4: (LEL) Steady State % 1
Time of Steady readings hh:mm:ss N/A 13:24:00 15:05:00 14:48:00
CO: Peak ppm 1
H2S: Peak ppm 1
CO2: Peak %v/v 0.1
O2: Minimum %v/v 0.1
CH4: (LEL) Peak % 1
CH4: Peak %v/v 0.1
13:22:00 15:04:00 14:47:00 10:36:00 10:08:00 08:12:00
Base depth of installation at
time of monitoringm 0.01
Time of 'Peak' readings hh:mm:ss N/A
Atmospheric pressure mb 1
Relative pressure mb 1
08:10:00
Water Level m 0.01
Time of initial readings hh:mm:ss
7 8
N/A 13:21:00 15:02:00 14:45:00
19/03/2014 27/03/2014
10:35:00 10:06:00
Detection
Limit
Monitoring round no.
02/04/2014 10/04/2014
4 5 6
Top of response zone 1.80 Base of response zone
Date dd/mm/yyyy N/A 05/03/2014 11/03/2014
Measured Parameter Units
6.20
03Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
GMP = Gas Monitoring Point, GMP+SP = Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe, GMP+SPIE
= Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe Piezometer, GMP+GWMP = Gas Monitoring Point
and Groundwater Monitoring Point
N/A N/A 1 2 3
Distance to monitoring point 6.50 Monitoring Point ID 01
6.50
Well Type SP+GMP Initial base depth of installation
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Record Of Gas
Monitoring
Hole ID
BH02Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Table No.
Notes Type of Sampling Point:
For double gas valves, record valves separately, using separate Monitoring Point ID
m
m m
m
2.72 2.84 2.80 2.83 2.86 2.81
1014 1028 1014 1008 1009 1016
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
7.60 7.60 7.60 7.60 7.60 7.60
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
0.7 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.6
20.2 20.4 20.7 19.7 20.3 20.1
46 1 2 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
0.7 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.4
20.2 20.4 20.8 20.0 20.4 20.4
3 1 1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Equipment Serial Number
Monitored By
Comments
Form No. Revision No.SE-EMS-F-002 2.06 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
30/01/2014
TE CE SB CE CE CE
Equipment Last Calibrated 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014
G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347
Fine
Equipment Type GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA5000
Weather Conditions: Fine Sunny Sunny Sunny Cloud
H2S: Steady State ppm 1
Gas Flow l/hr 0.1
O2: Steady State %v/v 0.1
CO: Steady State ppm 1
CH4: Steady State %v/v 0.1
CO2: Steady State %v/v 0.1
10:23:00 11:04:00 08:34:00
CH4: (LEL) Steady State % 1
Time of Steady readings hh:mm:ss N/A 14:15:00 15:23:00 15:46:00
CO: Peak ppm 1
H2S: Peak ppm 1
CO2: Peak %v/v 0.1
O2: Minimum %v/v 0.1
CH4: (LEL) Peak % 1
CH4: Peak %v/v 0.1
14:12:00 15:21:00 15:45:30 10:22:00 11:03:00 08:32:00
Base depth of installation at
time of monitoringm 0.01
Time of 'Peak' readings hh:mm:ss N/A
Atmospheric pressure mb 1
Relative pressure mb 1
08:30:00
Water Level m 0.01
Time of initial readings hh:mm:ss
7 8
N/A 14:10:00 15:20:00 15:45:00
19/03/2014 27/03/2014
10:20:00 11:00:00
Detection
Limit
Monitoring round no.
02/04/2014 10/04/2014
4 5 6
Top of response zone 4.30 Base of response zone
Date dd/mm/yyyy N/A 05/03/2014 11/03/2014
Measured Parameter Units
7.60
03Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
GMP = Gas Monitoring Point, GMP+SP = Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe, GMP+SPIE
= Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe Piezometer, GMP+GWMP = Gas Monitoring Point
and Groundwater Monitoring Point
N/A N/A 1 2 3
Distance to monitoring point 7.70 Monitoring Point ID 01
7.70
Well Type SP+GMP Initial base depth of installation
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Record Of Gas
Monitoring
Hole ID
BH03Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Table No.
Notes Type of Sampling Point:
For double gas valves, record valves separately, using separate Monitoring Point ID
m
m m
m
2.545
2.70 2.65 2.72 2.70 2.69
NR5
1028 1014 1008 1009 1016
NR5
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1
5.905
5.90 5.90 5.90 5.90 5.90
NR5
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1
NR5
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
NR5
0.3 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.3
NR5
20.4 19.1 20.1 20.3 20.2
NR5
<1 3 <1 <1 <1
NR5
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1
NR5
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1
NR5
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
NR5
0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3
NR5
20.4 20.0 20.1 20.4 20.0
<15
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1
NR5
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1
NR5
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Equipment Serial Number
Monitored By
Comments
Form No. Revision No.SE-EMS-F-002 2.06 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
5. No reading due to gas tap problem
30/01/2014
TE CE SB CE CE CE
Equipment Last Calibrated 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014
G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347
Fine
Equipment Type GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA5000
Weather Conditions: Fine Sunny Sunny Sunny Cloud
H2S: Steady State ppm 1
Gas Flow l/hr 0.1
O2: Steady State %v/v 0.1
CO: Steady State ppm 1
CH4: Steady State %v/v 0.1
CO2: Steady State %v/v 0.1
10:33:00 10:33:00 08:54:00
CH4: (LEL) Steady State % 1
Time of Steady readings hh:mm:ss N/A 14:12:00 15:27:00 15:02:00
CO: Peak ppm 1
H2S: Peak ppm 1
CO2: Peak %v/v 0.1
O2: Minimum %v/v 0.1
CH4: (LEL) Peak % 1
CH4: Peak %v/v 0.1
14:11:00 15:26:00 15:00:00 10:32:00 10:32:00 08:53:00
Base depth of installation at
time of monitoringm 0.01
Time of 'Peak' readings hh:mm:ss N/A
Atmospheric pressure mb 1
Relative pressure mb 1
08:50:00
Water Level m 0.01
Time of initial readings hh:mm:ss
7 8
N/A 14:10:00 15:25:00 14:59:00
19/03/2014 27/03/2014
10:30:00 10:30:00
Detection
Limit
Monitoring round no.
02/04/2014 10/04/2014
4 5 6
Top of response zone 2.30 Base of response zone
Date dd/mm/yyyy N/A 05/03/2014 11/03/2014
Measured Parameter Units
6.00
03Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
GMP = Gas Monitoring Point, GMP+SP = Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe, GMP+SPIE
= Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe Piezometer, GMP+GWMP = Gas Monitoring Point
and Groundwater Monitoring Point
N/A N/A 1 2 3
Distance to monitoring point 6.20 Monitoring Point ID 01
6.20
Well Type SP+GMP Initial base depth of installation
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Record Of Gas
Monitoring
Hole ID
BH04Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Table No.
Notes Type of Sampling Point:
For double gas valves, record valves separately, using separate Monitoring Point ID
m
m m
m
2.49 2.60 2.65 2.58 2.60 2.62
1014 1028 1014 1008 1009 1016
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
6.17 6.17 6.17 6.17 6.17 6.17
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.1 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.3
20.8 20.6 20.3 20.5 20.4 20.4
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.1 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.3
20.8 20.5 20.3 20.5 20.4 20.4
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Equipment Serial Number
Monitored By
Comments
Form No. Revision No.SE-EMS-F-002 2.06 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
31/01/2014
TE CE SB CE CE CE
Equipment Last Calibrated 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 31/01/2014
G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347
Fine
Equipment Type GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA5000
Weather Conditions: Fine Sunny Sunny Sunny Cloud
H2S: Steady State ppm 1
Gas Flow l/hr 0.1
O2: Steady State %v/v 0.1
CO: Steady State ppm 1
CH4: Steady State %v/v 0.1
CO2: Steady State %v/v 0.1
10:04:00 11:23:00 08:06:00
CH4: (LEL) Steady State % 1
Time of Steady readings hh:mm:ss N/A 15:18:00 15:00:00 14:51:00
CO: Peak ppm 1
H2S: Peak ppm 1
CO2: Peak %v/v 0.1
O2: Minimum %v/v 0.1
CH4: (LEL) Peak % 1
CH4: Peak %v/v 0.1
15:17:00 14:59:00 14:50:30 10:02:00 11:22:00 08:03:00
Base depth of installation at
time of monitoringm 0.01
Time of 'Peak' readings hh:mm:ss N/A
Atmospheric pressure mb 1
Relative pressure mb 1
08:00:00
Water Level m 0.01
Time of initial readings hh:mm:ss
7 8
N/A 15:16:00 14:58:00 14:50:00
19/03/2014 27/03/2014
10:00:00 11:20:00
Detection
Limit
Monitoring round no.
02/01/2014 10/04/2014
4 5 6
Top of response zone 2.80 Base of response zone
Date dd/mm/yyyy N/A 05/03/2014 11/03/2014
Measured Parameter Units
6.00
03Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
GMP = Gas Monitoring Point, GMP+SP = Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe, GMP+SPIE
= Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe Piezometer, GMP+GWMP = Gas Monitoring Point
and Groundwater Monitoring Point
N/A N/A 1 2 3
Distance to monitoring point 6.20 Monitoring Point ID 01
6.20
Well Type SP+GMP Initial base depth of installation
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Record Of Gas
Monitoring
Hole ID
BH05Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Table No.
Notes Type of Sampling Point:
For double gas valves, record valves separately, using separate Monitoring Point ID
m
m m
m
2.66 2.70 2.76 2.73 2.72 2.69
1014 1028 1014 1008 1009 1016
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 0.2 0.1 <0.1 <0.1
0.3 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.2
20.3 20.4 19.9 20.3 20.2 20.4
<1 <1 1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1
20.3 20.4 20.5 20.3 20.4 20.6
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Equipment Serial Number
Monitored By
Comments
Form No. Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
05/03/2014
13:45:00
Relative pressure
CH4: Peak
CO: Peak
Atmospheric pressure
CO2: Peak
Time of Steady readings
Time of 'Peak' readings
Base depth of installation at
time of monitoring
CH4: (LEL) Peak
O2: Minimum
H2S: Steady State
Distance to monitoring point
Top of response zone
Time of initial readings
Water Level
Monitoring round no. N/A
dd/mm/yyyy
Well Type
GMP = Gas Monitoring Point, GMP+SP = Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe, GMP+SPIE
= Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe Piezometer, GMP+GWMP = Gas Monitoring Point
and Groundwater Monitoring Point
01Monitoring Point ID
4.00
4.45Base of response zone
Initial base depth of installationSP+GMP
19/03/2014 02/04/2014
11:15:00
10/04/2014
4.45
2.00
Detection
Limit
2
N/A
%v/v
%
CO: Steady State
CO2: Steady State
1
O2: Steady State
CH4: Steady State
0.1
0.1
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Record Of Gas
Monitoring
14:38:00
27/03/2014
10:15:00
Mott MacDonald Ltd
Burton and South Derbyshire College
N/A
1
Hole ID
WS01
03
Table No.
15:06:00 11:20:00 08:22:00
4 5
SE-EMS-F-002
Weather Conditions:
m 0.01
m
mb
mb
1
1
H2S: Peak
l/hr
27/01/2014
GA2000+ GA5000 GA5000
SB CE
G501347 G501347
Project No.
0.01
Engineer
Client
TA7329
Measured Parameter
Date
Units
15:05:00hh:mm:ss
30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014
Fine
GA5000
Sunny
10:16:00
SunnySunny
%
%v/v
%v/v
hh:mm:ss
0.1
N/A
1
0.1%v/v
%v/v
1ppm
hh:mm:ss N/A
0.1
CH4: (LEL) Steady State
0.1
Gas Flow
3
14:15:00
13:46:00
15:07:00 14:40:00
0.1
11/03/2014
1
1
N/A
ppm
GA5000
ppm
1
86
30/01/2014
10:18:00
08:20:00
Cloud Fine
11:22:00 08:24:00
Equipment Type
Equipment Last Calibrated
GA5000
G501347 G501347
ppm
14:39:00
%v/v
CE
G501347 G501347
CE
7
TE CE
2.06
30/01/2014
Issue Date
Notes Type of Sampling Point:
For double gas valves, record valves separately, using separate Monitoring Point ID
m
m m
m
2.63 3.20 2.75 2.74 2.76 2.70
1014 1028 1014 1008 1009 1016
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
3.45 3.46 3.46 3.46 3.46 3.46
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
30.0 0.3 0.2 0.2 <0.1 0.2
17.8 20.0 20.5 20.4 21.0 20.4
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
2.9 0.3 0.1 0.2 <0.1 0.2
17.8 20.2 20.5 20.4 20.2 20.3
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
<0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Equipment Serial Number
Monitored By
Comments
Form No. Revision No.SE-EMS-F-002 2.06 Issue Date 27/01/2014 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
30/01/2014
TE CE SB CE CE CE
Equipment Last Calibrated 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014 30/01/2014
G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347 G501347
Fine
Equipment Type GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA5000 GA5000
Weather Conditions: Fine Sunny Sunny Sunny Cloud
H2S: Steady State ppm 1
Gas Flow l/hr 0.1
O2: Steady State %v/v 0.1
CO: Steady State ppm 1
CH4: Steady State %v/v 0.1
CO2: Steady State %v/v 0.1
10:13:00 10:43:00 08:17:00
CH4: (LEL) Steady State % 1
Time of Steady readings hh:mm:ss N/A 13:08:00 15:23:00 14:32:00
CO: Peak ppm 1
H2S: Peak ppm 1
CO2: Peak %v/v 0.1
O2: Minimum %v/v 0.1
CH4: (LEL) Peak % 1
CH4: Peak %v/v 0.1
13:06:00 15:12:00 14:31:00 10:12:00 10:42:00 08:16:00
Base depth of installation at
time of monitoringm 0.01
Time of 'Peak' readings hh:mm:ss N/A
Atmospheric pressure mb 1
Relative pressure mb 1
08:15:00
Water Level m 0.01
Time of initial readings hh:mm:ss
7 8
N/A 13:05:00 15:10:00 14:30:00
19/03/2014 27/03/2014
10:10:00 10:40:00
Detection
Limit
Monitoring round no.
02/04/2014 10/04/2014
4 5 6
Top of response zone 1.30 Base of response zone
Date dd/mm/yyyy N/A 05/03/2014 11/03/2014
Measured Parameter Units
3.70
03Client Burton and South Derbyshire College
GMP = Gas Monitoring Point, GMP+SP = Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe, GMP+SPIE
= Gas Monitoring Point and Standpipe Piezometer, GMP+GWMP = Gas Monitoring Point
and Groundwater Monitoring Point
N/A N/A 1 2 3
Distance to monitoring point 3.70 Monitoring Point ID 01
3.70
Well Type SP+GMP Initial base depth of installation
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Record Of Gas
Monitoring
Hole ID
WS03Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Table No.
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION BLaboratory Testing
KEY TO LABORATORY TEST RESULTS AND SUMMARY SHEETS
section title sheets x25.indd 18 14/03/2013 16:17
SECTION B: KEY TO LABORATORY TEST RESULTS AND SUMMARY SHEETS
FIELD IDENTIFICATION
Sample Type U Undisturbed sample D Small disturbed sample UT Thin wall open drive tube sample B Bulk disturbed sample P Piston sample AMAL Amalgamated sample TW Thin walled sample BLK Block sample L Liner sample C Core sample
Test status Any result in italics indicates a test that is not within the scope of the UKAS accreditationfor this laboratory.
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY SOIL TESTS: INDEX / CLASSIFICATION TESTS
Particle density p Small pyknometer method g Gas jar method
Plastic index N/P Non plastic, although liquid limit will have been determined if requested
Particle size (PSD) 1 Following value in silt column denotes combined clay and silt fractionp Following value in clay column denotes sedimentation by pipette, else
sedimentation is by hydrometer.
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY SOIL TESTS: STRENGTH AND PERMEABILITY TESTS
Triaxial UU Single stage unconsolidated quick undrainedUUM Multi stage unconsolidated quick undrainedUU3 Set of 3 unconsolidated quick undrainedCU Single stage consolidated undrainedCUM Multi stage consolidated undrainedCU3 Set of 3 consolidated undrainedCD Single stage consolidated drainedCDM Multi stage consolidated drainedCD3 Set of 3 consolidated drained
Note that single stage tests are reported assuming phi = 0 for total stress
Consolidation Oed One-dimensional oedometermv Coefficient of compressibility quoted for range p0 to p0 + 100kPa, where determined
Permeability C Constant head permeability
Shearbox SSB Small shear boxLSB Large shear boxp Peak valuer Residual shear strengthRS Ring shear
Page 1 of 2 Issue 2.0
Section B - Key_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:39 Page 1
SECTION B: KEY TO LABORATORY TEST RESULTS AND SUMMARY SHEETS
Page 2 of 2 Issue 2.0
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY SOIL RE-USE TESTS
MCV s MCV value at natural or specified moisture contentint Intercept of calibration line in MCV calibration
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ROCK STRENGTH TESTS
Point Type D Diametral A AxialLoad (combination I Irregular lump B Block
of) L Test performed parallel to planes of weaknessP Test performed perpendicular to planes of weaknessX Invalid failure of point load (not broken between points of load application)
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ROCK MATERIALS TESTS
Ten% fines w Soaked test d Dry test
Important note: Summary sheets are provided for convenience and in no way replace individual test result sheets which shall,without exception, be regarded as the definitive result.
POINT LOAD INDEX RESULT
Point Type D Diametral A AxialLoad (combination I Irregular lump B Block
of) L Test performed parallel to planes of weaknessP Test performed perpendicular to planes of weaknessX Invalid failure of point load (not broken between points of load application)
Dimensions W Diameter of core or average smallest width perpendicular to axis of loading in ablock or irregular lump
D Distance between platens when just in contact with specimenD' Distance between platens at point of failureDe Equivalent core diameter Is P/De2
Is(50) F x Is F (De/50)0.45
Is(50) point load strength index corrected for a diametral test of core diameter 50mmFor Axial/Lump tests De2 = (4/Pi) x (W x D')For Diametral tests De2 = D x D'
Section B - Key_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:39 Page 2
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION BLaboratory Testing
LABORATORY SOIL TESTSUMMARY SHEETS
section title sheets x25.indd 19 14/03/2013 16:17
% % % % % % % % % % %
005 B 01 4¹ 25 32 39
007 B 01 10¹ 41 49 0
013 B 01 2¹ 60 38 0
018 D 01 24
020 D 01 26 34 22 12 98
024 U 01 27 32 22 10 100
006 AMAL 01 11¹ 50 39 0
004 D 01 13 30 14 16 47
011 B 01 8¹ 32 61 0
018 B 01 1¹ 52 47 0
020 U 01 26 32 22 10 92
021 D 012.61
p
022 D 01 19
024 D 01 20 28 20 8 100
006 B 01 4p 11 43 42 0
008 B 01 9¹ 43 48 0
014 B 01 3¹ 66 31 0
020 B 01 4¹ 55 39 2
023 D 01 28
024 U 01 28 33 22 11 97
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 2.03 Issue Date 20/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Stuart Kirk28/03/2014
BH03 8.50 8.50
Leeds Laboratory
BH03 6.50 6.50
BH03 8.50 8.50
BH03 1.50 1.50
BH03 3.50 3.50
BH02 8.50 8.50
BH03 1.00 1.00
BH02 7.00 7.00
BH02 7.50 7.50
BH02 5.50 5.50
BH02 6.50 6.50
BH02 1.00 1.00
BH02 2.50 2.50
BH01 8.50 8.50
BH02 1.00 1.00
BH01 6.50 6.50
BH01 7.00 7.00
BH01 1.50 1.50
BH01 3.50 3.50
Dry Density
Particle Density
Plastic Limit
Passing 425µm
Clay
Sample no.
Bulk Density
Specimen depth m
Sample type
Moisture Content
Mg/m³
Silt
Gravel
Particle size
Sand
Cobbles
Hole ID
BH01
Sample depth m
1.00
Liquid Limit
1.00
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Classification Tests
Summary
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
Project No. TA7329
Plastic Index
Linear Shrinkage
Specimen no.
% % % % % % % % % % %
Dry Density
Particle Density
Plastic Limit
Passing 425µm
Clay
Sample no.
Bulk Density
Specimen depth m
Sample type
Moisture Content
Mg/m³
Silt
Gravel
Particle size
Sand
Cobbles
Hole ID
Sample depth m
Liquid Limit
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Classification Tests
Summary
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
Project No. TA7329
Plastic Index
Linear Shrinkage
Specimen no.
025 D 01 22
026 D 012.62
p
005 B 01 14¹ 38 49 0
008 B 01 9¹ 46 46 0
010 B 01 6¹ 77 17 0
015 B 01 1¹ 48 51 0
018 D 01 32 31 21 10 98
006 B 01 9¹ 35 55 0
012 B 01 1¹ 49 47 3
017 B 01 1¹ 58 41 0
020 D 012.61
p
021 U 01 26 31 22 9 84
022 D 01 25
003 B 01 3p 8 36 42 9
006 D 01 20 38 23 15 34
009 B 01 3p 11 60 25 0
013 B 01 5¹ 76 19 0
004 D 01 24 37 21 16 69
010 B 01 5¹ 54 40 0
004 B 01 7p 8 47 38 0
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 2.03 Issue Date 20/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Leeds Laboratory
Stuart Kirk28/03/2014
WS03 0.50 0.50
WS02 0.50 0.50
WS02 2.00 2.00
WS01 1.20 1.20
WS01 3.00 3.00
WS01 0.50 0.50
WS01 1.00 1.00
BH05 7.00 7.00
BH05 7.50 7.50
BH05 5.50 5.50
BH05 7.00 7.00
BH05 1.00 1.00
BH05 3.50 3.50
BH04 4.50 4.50
BH04 6.50 6.50
BH04 1.50 1.50
BH04 2.50 2.50
BH03 9.50 9.50
BH04 1.00 1.00
BH03 9.00 9.00
% % % % % % % % % % %
Dry Density
Particle Density
Plastic Limit
Passing 425µm
Clay
Sample no.
Bulk Density
Specimen depth m
Sample type
Moisture Content
Mg/m³
Silt
Gravel
Particle size
Sand
Cobbles
Hole ID
Sample depth m
Liquid Limit
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Classification Tests
Summary
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
Project No. TA7329
Plastic Index
Linear Shrinkage
Specimen no.
007 D 01 14 36 16 20 45
008 D 012.67
p
010 B 01 5¹ 51 45 0
004 B 01 11¹ 70 19 0
008 B 01 5p 8 41 46 0
012 B 01 10¹ 46 44 0
007 D 01 15 27 19 8 65
012 D 01 8¹ 39 53 0
End
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
WS05 3.00 3.00
WS04 3.00 3.00
WS05 1.20 1.20
WS04 0.50 0.50
WS04 1.20 1.20
WS03 1.20 1.20
WS03 2.00 2.00
WS03 1.20 1.20
Leeds Laboratory
28/03/2014
2.03 Issue Date 20/11/2012
Stuart Kirk
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
006 AMAL 02
006 AMAL 03
004 B 03
Print date
Revision No.
2.0 2.7
50 80
WS03 0.50 0.50 25 1.86
BH02 1.00 1.00 7.2 2.27
% Pinhole Dispersion
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Top Base
% %
Project Name
Engineer
Burton and South Derbyshire College
Project No.
Employer
Summary Of Laboratory
Soil Re-Use Tests
Mg/m³
Compaction
Mg/m³
CBR
Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
TA7329
Mott MacDonald Ltd
BH02 1.00
Leeds LaboratoryApproved by:
Stuart Kirk
Hole ID
Sample depth m
1.00
Sample no.
Sample type
Specimen depth m
%Specimen no.
OMC Max DD
MCV
Moisture
Content
Bulk Density
2.157.8
End
28/03/2014
Issue Date 09/01/20132.03
c Ø c Ø
% Mg/m³ kPa º m²/MN m/s kPa º
019 U 1 34 2.13 UU 80 0
020 U 2 24 2.13 UU 93 0
024 U 2 31 1.99 UU 73 0
021 U 2 26 2.14 UU 56 0
End
Approved by:
Stuart Kirk
Revision No. 3.03
BH05 7.00 7.10
BH02 6.50 6.50
BH03 8.50 8.52
Leeds Laboratory
23/11/2012Issue Date
28/03/2014Print date
6.50
Triaxial
Type
Specim
en no.
Bulk Density
Moisture Content
Sample no.
Specim
en depth m
Sample type
Shearbox
Type
Consol
Type mv
Type
Permeability
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
Project No. TA7329
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Strength and
Permeability Summary
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Hole ID
BH01
Sample depth m
6.50
K
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION BLaboratory Testing
LABORATORY SOIL TESTDATA SHEETS
section title sheets x25.indd 20 14/03/2013 16:17
Description
Moisture Content %
Estimated percentage retained on 425µm sieve:
Preparation of sample: Natural
Remarks:
Moisture content of soil passing 425µm
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 19/11/2012
28/03/2014
020
Sample Type
DSpecimen Depth
Liquid And Plastic
Limit Test
Hole ID
BH01
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Liquidity index:
Liquid limit:
Plastic limit:
Plasticity index:
34%
22%
Sushil Sharda
2%
Leeds Laboratory
0.38
2.07 Issue Date
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
12%
27%
Natural moisture content: 26%
Reddish brown sandy slightly gravelly CLAY.
Test Method: BS1377: Part 2: 1990:
Clause 4.3 and 5
Cone Pen
etration m
m
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Project No. TA7329
1Specimen Number
Sample Depth
7.00m
Sample Number
7.00m
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
30 32 34 36 38 40
CL
ML MI MH
CI CH
MV
CV CE
ME0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Plasticity Index(%)
Liquid Limit (%)
Description
Moisture Content %
Estimated percentage retained on 425µm sieve:
Preparation of sample: Natural
Remarks:
Moisture content of soil passing 425µm
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 19/11/2012
28/03/2014
024
Sample Type
USpecimen Depth
Liquid And Plastic
Limit Test
Hole ID
BH01
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Liquidity index:
Liquid limit:
Plastic limit:
Plasticity index:
32%
22%
Sushil Sharda
0%
Leeds Laboratory
0.48
2.07 Issue Date
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
10%
27%
Natural moisture content: 27%
Brown CLAY with occasional fine mudstone gravel.
Test Method: BS1377: Part 2: 1990:
Clause 4.3 and 5
Cone Pen
etration m
m
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Project No. TA7329
1Specimen Number
Sample Depth
8.50m
Sample Number
8.50m
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
30 32 34 36 38 40
CL
ML MI MH
CI CH
MV
CV CE
ME0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Plasticity Index(%)
Liquid Limit (%)
Description
Moisture Content %
Percentage retained on 425µm sieve:
Preparation of sample: Wet sieve
Remarks:
Moisture content of soil passing 425µm
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 19/11/2012
28/03/2014
004
Sample Type
DSpecimen Depth
Liquid And Plastic
Limit Test
Hole ID
BH02
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Liquidity index:
Liquid limit:
Plastic limit:
Plasticity index:
30%
14%
Stuart Kirk
53%
Leeds Laboratory
0.87
2.07 Issue Date
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
16%
28%
Natural moisture content: 13%
Light brownish grey gravelly sandy CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse rounded
Test Method: BS1377: Part 2: 1990:
Clause 4.3 and 5
Cone Penetration m
m
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Project No. TA7329
1Specimen Number
Sample Depth
1.00m
Sample Number
1.00m
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
20 24 28 32 36 40
CL
ML MI MH
CI CH
MV
CV CE
ME0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Plasticity Index(%)
Liquid Limit (%)
Description
Moisture Content %
Estimated percentage retained on 425µm sieve:
Preparation of sample: Natural
Remarks:
Moisture content of soil passing 425µm
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 19/11/2012
28/03/2014
020
Sample Type
USpecimen Depth
Liquid And Plastic
Limit Test
Hole ID
BH02
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Liquidity index:
Liquid limit:
Plastic limit:
Plasticity index:
32%
22%
Sushil Sharda
8%
Leeds Laboratory
0.66
2.07 Issue Date
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
10%
29%
Natural moisture content: 26%
Laminated brown CLAY with fine to medium mudstone gravel.
Test Method: BS1377: Part 2: 1990:
Clause 4.3 and 5
Co
ne
Pen
etra
tio
n m
m
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Project No. TA7329
1Specimen Number
Sample Depth
6.50m
Sample Number
6.50m
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
30 32 34 36 38 40
CL
ML MI MH
CI CH
MV
CV CE
ME0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Pla
stic
ity
Ind
ex(%
)
Liquid Limit (%)
Description
Moisture Content %
Estimated percentage retained on 425µm sieve:
Preparation of sample: Natural
Remarks:
Moisture content of soil passing 425µm
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 19/11/2012
28/03/2014
024
Sample Type
DSpecimen Depth
Liquid And Plastic
Limit Test
Hole ID
BH02
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Liquidity index:
Liquid limit:
Plastic limit:
Plasticity index:
28%
20%
Sushil Sharda
0%
Leeds Laboratory
-0.05
2.07 Issue Date
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
8%
20%
Natural moisture content: 20%
Greyish brown sandy CLAY.
Test Method: BS1377: Part 2: 1990:
Clause 4.4 and 5
Cone Pen
etration m
m
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Project No. TA7329
1Specimen Number
Sample Depth
8.50m
Sample Number
8.50m
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
20 22 24 26 28 30
CL
ML MI MH
CI CH
MV
CV CE
ME0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Plasticity Index(%)
Liquid Limit (%)
Description
Moisture Content %
Estimated percentage retained on 425µm sieve:
Preparation of sample: Natural
Remarks:
Moisture content of soil passing 425µm
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 19/11/2012
28/03/2014
024
Sample Type
USpecimen Depth
Liquid And Plastic
Limit Test
Hole ID
BH03
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Liquidity index:
Liquid limit:
Plastic limit:
Plasticity index:
33%
22%
Sushil Sharda
3%
Leeds Laboratory
0.67
2.07 Issue Date
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
11%
29%
Natural moisture content: 28%
Brown sandy CLAY with fine subrounded gravel.
Test Method: BS1377: Part 2: 1990:
Clause 4.3 and 5
Co
ne
Pen
etra
tio
n m
m
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Project No. TA7329
1Specimen Number
Sample Depth
8.50m
Sample Number
8.50m
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
30 32 34 36 38 40
CL
ML MI MH
CI CH
MV
CV CE
ME0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Pla
stic
ity
Ind
ex(%
)
Liquid Limit (%)
Description
Moisture Content %
Estimated percentage retained on 425µm sieve:
Preparation of sample: Natural
Remarks:
Moisture content of soil passing 425µm
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 19/11/2012
28/03/2014
018
Sample Type
DSpecimen Depth
Liquid And Plastic
Limit Test
Hole ID
BH04
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Liquidity index:
Liquid limit:
Plastic limit:
Plasticity index:
31%
21%
Sushil Sharda
2%
Leeds Laboratory
1.22
2.07 Issue Date
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
10%
33%
Natural moisture content: 32%
Reddish brown sandy CLAY with occasional fine gravel.
Test Method: BS1377: Part 2: 1990:
Clause 4.3 and 5
Co
ne
Pen
etra
tio
n m
m
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Project No. TA7329
1Specimen Number
Sample Depth
6.50m
Sample Number
6.50m
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
20 24 28 32 36 40
CL
ML MI MH
CI CH
MV
CV CE
ME0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Pla
stic
ity
Ind
ex(%
)
Liquid Limit (%)
Description
Moisture Content %
Percentage retained on 425µm sieve:
Preparation of sample: Wet sieve
Remarks:
Moisture content of soil passing 425µm
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 19/11/2012
28/03/2014
021
Sample Type
USpecimen Depth
Liquid And Plastic
Limit Test
Hole ID
BH05
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Liquidity index:
Liquid limit:
Plastic limit:
Plasticity index:
31%
22%
Sushil Sharda
16%
Leeds Laboratory
0.96
2.07 Issue Date
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
9%
31%
Natural moisture content: 26%
Dark brown very sandy slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is subrounded.
Test Method: BS1377: Part 2: 1990:
Clause 4.3 and 5
Cone Penetration m
m
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Project No. TA7329
1Specimen Number
Sample Depth
7.00m
Sample Number
7.00m
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
20 24 28 32 36 40
CL
ML MI MH
CI CH
MV
CV CE
ME0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Plasticity Index(%)
Liquid Limit (%)
Description
Moisture Content %
Percentage retained on 425µm sieve:
Preparation of sample: Wet sieve
Remarks:
Moisture content of soil passing 425µm
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 19/11/2012
28/03/2014
006
Sample Type
DSpecimen Depth
Liquid And Plastic
Limit Test
Hole ID
WS01
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Liquidity index:
Liquid limit:
Plastic limit:
Plasticity index:
38%
23%
Stuart Kirk
66%
Leeds Laboratory
2.37
2.07 Issue Date
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
15%
59%
Natural moisture content: 20%
Dark brown gravelly sandy CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse rounded to angular
Test Method: BS1377: Part 2: 1990:
Clause 4.3 and 5
Cone Penetration m
m
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Project No. TA7329
1Specimen Number
Sample Depth
1.00m
Sample Number
1.00m
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
30 32 34 36 38 40
CL
ML MI MH
CI CH
MV
CV CE
ME0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Plasticity Index(%)
Liquid Limit (%)
Description
Moisture Content %
Percentage retained on 425µm sieve:
Preparation of sample: Wet sieve
Remarks:
Moisture content of soil passing 425µm
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 19/11/2012
28/03/2014
004
Sample Type
DSpecimen Depth
Liquid And Plastic
Limit Test
Hole ID
WS02
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Liquidity index:
Liquid limit:
Plastic limit:
Plasticity index:
37%
21%
Stuart Kirk
31%
Leeds Laboratory
0.89
2.07 Issue Date
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
16%
35%
Natural moisture content: 24%
MADE GROUND: Dark brown gravelly sandy clay. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded with
brick fragments
Test Method: BS1377: Part 2: 1990:
Clause 4.3 and 5
Cone Penetration m
m
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Project No. TA7329
1Specimen Number
Sample Depth
0.50m
Sample Number
0.50m
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
30 32 34 36 38 40
CL
ML MI MH
CI CH
MV
CV CE
ME0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Plasticity Index(%)
Liquid Limit (%)
Description
Moisture Content %
Percentage retained on 425µm sieve:
Preparation of sample: Wet sieve
Remarks:
Moisture content of soil passing 425µm
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 19/11/2012
28/03/2014
007
Sample Type
DSpecimen Depth
Liquid And Plastic
Limit Test
Hole ID
WS03
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Liquidity index:
Liquid limit:
Plastic limit:
Plasticity index:
36%
16% Insufficient specimen to perform 4 point test.
Stuart Kirk
55%
Leeds Laboratory
0.79
2.07 Issue Date
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
20%
32%
Natural moisture content: 14%
Yellowish brown gravelly sandy CLAY. Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded
Test Method: BS1377: Part 2: 1990:
Clause 4.4 and 5
Cone Penetration m
m
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Project No. TA7329
1Specimen Number
Sample Depth
1.20m
Sample Number
1.20m
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
30 32 34 36 38 40
CL
ML MI MH
CI CH
MV
CV CE
ME0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Plasticity Index(%)
Liquid Limit (%)
Description
Moisture Content %
Percentage retained on 425µm sieve:
Preparation of sample: Wet sieve
Remarks:
Moisture content of soil passing 425µm
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 19/11/2012
28/03/2014
007
Sample Type
DSpecimen Depth
Liquid And Plastic
Limit Test
Hole ID
WS05
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Liquidity index:
Liquid limit:
Plastic limit:
Plasticity index:
27%
19%
Stuart Kirk
35%
Leeds Laboratory
0.49
2.07 Issue Date
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
8%
23%
Natural moisture content: 15%
Brownclayey gravelly SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular
Test Method: BS1377: Part 2: 1990:
Clause 4.3 and 5
Cone Penetration m
m
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Project No. TA7329
1Specimen Number
Sample Depth
1.20m
Sample Number
1.20m
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
20 22 24 26 28 30
CL
ML MI MH
CI CH
MV
CV CE
ME0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Plasticity Index(%)
Liquid Limit (%)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
64
58
53
61
60
Issue Date
100
64
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 4
Sand: 25
1.00mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH01
Sample size was insufficient to be representative of particle size distribution
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
41
32
31
38
PARTICLE SIZE %
39
Gravel: 32
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
5
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
9
12
34
Sample Depth
1.00m
005
30
MADE GROUND : Dark brown black gravelly sand. Gravel is medium to coarse rounded
with brick fragments.
16
63.0 61 28
25
2237.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
89
79
98
93
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 10
Sand: 41
1.50mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH01
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
71
56
53
65
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 49
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
10
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
14
19
59
Sample Depth
1.50m
007
50
Brown SAND and medium to coarse rounded and subangular GRAVEL.
26
63.0 100 47
43
3737.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
97
93
100
100
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 2
Sand: 60
3.50mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH01
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
88
72
68
83
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 38
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
2
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
3
5
75
Sample Depth
3.50m
013
62
Brown gravelly coarse SAND. Gravel is medium to coarse subrounded.
12
63.0 100 57
46
2837.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
95
89
100
100
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 11
Sand: 50
1.00mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
AMALSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH02
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
81
66
64
75
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 39
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
11
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
14
17
69
Sample Depth
1.00m
006
61
Brown grey mottled slightly clayey gravelly SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular.
Amalgamation: BH02,006,B,1.00m+BH05,008,B,1.50m+BH05,010,B,2.50m.
24
63.0 100 59
53
4137.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
90
83
100
96
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 8
Sand: 32
2.50mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH02
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
71
51
45
61
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 61
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
8
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
10
13
54
Sample Depth
2.50m
011
39
Brown sandy GRAVEL. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular.
16
63.0 100 35
28
2237.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
92
86
100
92
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 1
Sand: 52
5.50mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH02
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
79
58
56
71
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 47
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
1
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
3
9
62
Sample Depth
5.50m
018
53
Brown gravelly SAND. Gravel is medium to coarse rounded.
22
63.0 100 51
45
3637.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
85
79
98
91
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Stuart Kirk 28/03/2014
Silt: 11
Sand: 43
1.00mSpecimen No.
1
AssumedMg/m³2.65
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2, 9.4
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH03
Sample size was insufficient to be representative of particle size distribution
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATA SEDIMENTATION DATACumulative
% passing
Equivalent
particle
diameter mm
Sieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
75
63
61
71
0.002
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Particle density:
Gravel: 42
Cobbles:
4Clay:
Sieve size mm
14.0
15
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
24
28
66 0.006
Sample Depth
1.00m
006
58
9
6
4
0.020
MADE GROUND: Brown slightly clayey sand and gravel. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular
with some metal and clinker fragments
34
63.0 100 53
46
4037.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
94
85
100
100
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 9
Sand: 43
1.50mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH03
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
76
59
55
69
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 48
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
9
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
14
18
62
Sample Depth
1.50m
008
52
Brown slightly clayey SAND and GRAVEL. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular.
23
63.0 100 49
42
3337.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
95
90
100
97
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 3
Sand: 66
3.50mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH03
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
85
72
70
79
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 31
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
3
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
5
13
74
Sample Depth
3.50m
014
69
Brown gravelly SAND. Gravel is medium to coarse rounded.
26
63.0 100 67
59
4237.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
89
81
97
92
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 4
Sand: 55
6.50mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH03
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
74
63
61
68
PARTICLE SIZE %
2
Gravel: 39
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
4
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
6
12
65
Sample Depth
6.50m
020
59
Brown SAND and GRAVEL. Gravel is medium to coarse rounded and subrounded.
23
63.0 98 56
50
3737.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
95
82
100
97
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 14
Sand: 38
1.00mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH04
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
76
57
54
67
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 49
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
14
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
19
22
60
Sample Depth
1.00m
005
51
Brown SAND and GRAVEL. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular.
28
63.0 100 50
46
3837.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
90
81
100
97
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 9
Sand: 46
1.50mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH04
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
75
61
59
69
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 46
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
9
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
12
16
63
Sample Depth
1.50m
008
54
Brown SAND and fine to coarse angular GRAVEL.
22
63.0 100 51
44
3437.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
96
96
100
100
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 6
Sand: 77
2.50mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH04
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
93
87
85
91
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 17
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
6
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
8
13
88
Sample Depth
2.50m
010
83
Brown slightly gravelly SAND. Gravel is medium to coarse rounded.
30
63.0 100 82
75
6037.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
92
84
100
95
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 1
Sand: 48
4.50mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH04
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
74
58
54
68
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 51
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
1
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
2
4
61
Sample Depth
4.50m
015
49
Brown SAND and GRAVEL. Gravel is medium to coarse rounded.
11
63.0 100 44
35
2437.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
97
87
100
100
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 9
Sand: 35
1.00mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH05
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
75
53
48
65
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 55
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
9
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
15
18
57
Sample Depth
1.00m
006
45
Brown sandy GRAVEL. Gravel is medium to coarse rounded.
23
63.0 100 41
37
3137.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
90
84
96
96
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 1
Sand: 49
3.50mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH05
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
76
55
53
66
PARTICLE SIZE %
3
Gravel: 47
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
1
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
2
5
59
Sample Depth
3.50m
012
50
Brown SAND and GRAVEL. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular.
13
63.0 97 47
40
2937.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
95
90
100
99
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 1
Sand: 58
5.50mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
BH05
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
77
63
61
70
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 41
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
1
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
4
14
65
Sample Depth
5.50m
017
59
Brown gravelly SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular.
28
63.0 100 58
53
4337.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
91
82
77
89
85
Issue Date
100
91
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Stuart Kirk 28/03/2014
Silt: 8
Sand: 36
0.50mSpecimen No.
1
AssumedMg/m³2.65
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2, 9.4
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
WS01
Sample size was insufficient to be representative of particle size distribution
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATA SEDIMENTATION DATACumulative
% passing
Equivalent
particle
diameter mm
Sieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
68
54
51
61
0.002
PARTICLE SIZE %
9
Particle density:
Gravel: 42
Cobbles:
3Clay:
Sieve size mm
14.0
12
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
20
25
56 0.006
Sample Depth
0.50m
003
48
8
5
3
0.020
MADE GROUND:Dark brown slightly clayey sandy gravel. Gravel is fine to coarse
subangular with brick and glass fragments
31
63.0 91 45
41
3737.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
96
92
100
100
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt: 11
Sand: 60
1.20mSpecimen No.
1
AssumedMg/m³2.65
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2, 9.4
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
WS01
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATA SEDIMENTATION DATACumulative
% passing
Equivalent
particle
diameter mm
Sieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
87
78
76
83
0.002
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Particle density:
Gravel: 25
Cobbles:
3Clay:
Sieve size mm
14.0
15
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
20
26
80 0.006
Sample Depth
1.20m
009
75
6
4
3
0.020
Brown slightly gravelly SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular.
43
63.0 100 73
68
6137.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
96
95
100
100
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 5
Sand: 76
3.00mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
WS01
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
92
84
83
88
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 19
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
5
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
7
13
85
Sample Depth
3.00m
013
82
Brown slightly gravelly SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular.
29
63.0 100 80
72
5037.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
93
87
100
95
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 5
Sand: 54
2.00mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
WS02
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
78
64
62
71
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 40
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
5
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
8
12
65
Sample Depth
2.00m
010
60
Brown gravelly SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular.
19
63.0 100 58
51
3737.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
100
100
100
100
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt: 8
Sand: 47
0.50mSpecimen No.
1
AssumedMg/m³2.65
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2, 9.4
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
WS03
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATA SEDIMENTATION DATACumulative
% passing
Equivalent
particle
diameter mm
Sieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
88
73
67
82
0.002
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Particle density:
Gravel: 38
Cobbles:
7Clay:
Sieve size mm
14.0
15
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
26
32
77 0.006
Sample Depth
0.50m
004
62
13
9
7
0.020
MADE GROUND : Grey slightly clayey slightly gravelly sand. Gravel is fine to coarse
subangular with brick, concrete and ceramic fragments.
40
63.0 100 57
52
4737.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
97
91
100
100
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 5
Sand: 51
2.00mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
WS03
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
81
62
59
73
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 45
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
5
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
8
11
64
Sample Depth
2.00m
010
56
Brown gravelly SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular.
19
63.0 100 53
46
3537.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
100
97
100
100
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 11
Sand: 70
0.50mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
WS04
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
92
84
83
90
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 19
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
11
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
36
50
85
Sample Depth
0.50m
004
81
Dark brown slightly gravelly SAND. Gravel is medium to coarse subangular.
63
63.0 100 79
76
7337.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
91
83
100
98
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Stuart Kirk 28/03/2014
Silt: 8
Sand: 41
1.20mSpecimen No.
1
AssumedMg/m³2.65
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2, 9.4
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
WS04
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATA SEDIMENTATION DATACumulative
% passing
Equivalent
particle
diameter mm
Sieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
75
60
58
69
0.002
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Particle density:
Gravel: 46
Cobbles:
5Clay:
Sieve size mm
14.0
14
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
19
22
62 0.006
Sample Depth
1.20m
008
54
8
5
5
0.020
Brown clayey SAND and GRAVEL. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular
28
63.0 100 52
46
3837.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
91
90
100
95
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Stuart Kirk 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 10
Sand: 46
3.00mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
BSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
WS04
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
82
62
59
74
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 44
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
10
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
15
19
65
Sample Depth
3.00m
012
56
Brown slightly clayey SAND and GRAVEL. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular
28
63.0 100 54
48
4037.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
Cumulative
% passing
2.00
1.18
0.600
0.425
0.300
0.212
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
0.150
0.063
100
90
82
100
100
Issue Date
100
100
75.0
3.03
Leeds Laboratory
125.0
90.0
20.0
50.0
19/11/2012
Sushil Sharda 28/03/2014
Silt and clay: 8
Sand: 39
3.00mSpecimen No.
1
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS 1377: Part 2: 1990: 9.2
Sample type
DSpecimen Depth
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Particle Size
Distribution
Hole ID
Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
WS05
Sample size was insufficient to be representative of particle size distribution
General remarks
WET SIEVE DATASieve size mm Cumulative
% passing
74
58
53
69
PARTICLE SIZE %
0
Gravel: 53
Cobbles:
Sieve size mm
14.0
8
3.35
10.0
6.3
5.0
12
15
63
Sample Depth
3.00m
012
47
Brown SAND and GRAVEL. Gravel is fine to medium subangular.
20
63.0 100 43
36
2837.5
28.0
0.002
0.006
0.03
0.06
0.2
0.6
2 6 20
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage Passing (%
)
Sieve Size (mm)
Description
Method of compaction
Batches tested
Particle density Assumed
Gravel retained on 20mm sieve
Gravel retained on 37.5mm sieve
General remarks
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 21/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group2.03 Issue Date
Sushil Sharda28/03/2014
Amalgamation: BH02,006,B,1.00m+BH05,008,B,1.50m+BH05,010,B,2.50m.
Leeds Laboratory
12%
3%
Hole ID
BH02
Sample Depth
1.00m
1.00m
Specimen Number
Specimen Depth
2
BS1377: Part 4: 1990: Clause 3
Sample Number
006
Sample Type
AMAL
2.65Mg/m³
3.4
Brown gravelly SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular.
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Dry Density /
Moisture Content
RelationshipProject No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
2.10Mg/m³
7.8%
2.15Mg/m³
Experimental points
Dry Density Mg/m³
Separate batches tested.
2.5kg Rammer 11.0
Maximum dry density
Optimum moisture content
Corrected maximum dry density for
removal of gravel
2.10
2.07
7.0
9.6
2.065.3
1.99
Moisture content %
Test performed on specimen unsuitable due to gravel content.
1.99
1.95
2.00
2.05
2.10
2.15
2.20
2 4 6 8 10 12
Dry den
sity M
g/m
3
Moisture content %
0% Air voids
5% Air voids
10% Air voids
Description
%
%
%
Mg/m³
Mg/m³
N
N
kg
%
%
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
28/03/2014
2.03 Issue Date 20/11/2012
Stuart Kirk
7.2
2.27
2.12
Leeds Laboratory
Surcharge
Gravel retained on 20mm sieve
15
Brown slightly clayey gravelly SAND. Gravel is fine to coarse subangular
Amalgamation: BH02,006,B,1.00m+BH05,008,B,1.50m+BH05,010,B,2.50m.
Specimen Depth
As received moisture content
7.2
Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
006
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS1377: Part 4: 1990: Clause 7
Sample Type
AMAL
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC California Bearing
Ratio Test
Hole ID
BH02
Project No. TA7329 Sample Depth
1.00m
Engineer
2.5kg rammer
Bulk density
Base
79
1.00m
Specimen Number
3
5.00 mm 80
Gravel retained on 37.5mm sieve
Unsoaked, Surcharge 6.4kg.Compacted at optimum moisture content. Test on top terminated on reaching load ring limit.General remarks
NoNoCurve correction
Seating load - top
Seating load - base
Top
41
50
0
Accepted CBR
50
250
6.4
11
Penetration
2.50 mm N/A
CBR values %
Method of compaction
Moisture content - top
Moisture content - base
Dry density
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5
Load kN
Penetration (mm)
Top
Base
Description
%
%
%
Mg/m³
Mg/m³
N
N
kg
%
%
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
28/03/2014
2.03 Issue Date 20/11/2012
Stuart Kirk
24
1.86
1.50
Leeds Laboratory
Surcharge
Gravel retained on 20mm sieve
25
Grey gravelly SAND. Gravel is fine to medium subangular. Specimen Depth
As received moisture content
25
Mott MacDonald Ltd Sample Number
004
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire CollegeBS1377: Part 4: 1990: Clause 7
Sample Type
B
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC California Bearing
Ratio Test
Hole ID
WS03
Project No. TA7329 Sample Depth
0.50m
Engineer
2.5kg rammer
Bulk density
Base
1.6
0.50m
Specimen Number
3
5.00 mm 2.7
Gravel retained on 37.5mm sieve
Unsoaked, Surcharge 6.382kg.Top test to 3.25mm tested below calibrated range of load ring.General remarks
NoNoCurve correction
Seating load - top
Seating load - base
Top
1.1
2.0
0
Accepted CBR
10
10
6.4
0
Penetration
2.50 mm N/A
CBR values %
Method of compaction
Moisture content - top
Moisture content - base
Dry density
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5
Load kN
Penetration (mm)
Top
Base
Description
Shear strength parameters c kPa φ ° Apparent c kPa
Undisturbed Single stage
Remarks
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
1
Deviator stress
Cell pressure
80 0.0
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
80
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
019
Sample Type
Undrained Triaxial
Compression Without
Measurement Of Pore
Pressure (Definitive Method)
Project No. TA7329
Hole ID
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
6.50m
Sample Number
BH01
Sample Depth
80
Grey slightly silty slightly gravelly SAND. Gravel is fine to medium subrounded.
U
Specimen Depth
6.50m
BS1377: Part 7: 1990: 8
Specimen Number
2.04 Issue Date 21/11/2012
Leeds Laboratory
High density rubber latex membrane used. Specimen cut with longest axis in a vertical orientation.
Sushil Sharda28/03/2014
1
130
161.32
160
1.45
0.382
34
2.13
1.59
102.82
198.50
20.7
2.03
Compound
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
%/min
Mg/m3
Mg/m3
%
kPa
Bulk density
mm
%
mm
mm
Membrane thickness
Moisture content
Cu
Rate of strain
Mode of failure
Test type
Test number
Dry density
Diameter
Length
Failure strain
Corrected deviator stress
Membrane correction
0
50
100
150
200
0 5 10 15 20 25
Dev
iato
r st
ress
kP
a
Strain %
Description
Shear strength parameters c kPa φ ° Apparent c kPa
Undisturbed Single stage
Remarks
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
2
Deviator stress
Cell pressure
93 0.0
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
93
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
020
Sample Type
Undrained Triaxial
Compression Without
Measurement Of Pore
Pressure (Definitive Method)
Project No. TA7329
Hole ID
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
6.50m
Sample Number
BH02
Sample Depth
93
Brown slightly gravelly CLAY. Gravel is fine to medium subrounded with grey mudstone
fragments.
U
Specimen Depth
6.50m
BS1377: Part 7: 1990: 8
Specimen Number
2.04 Issue Date 21/11/2012
Leeds Laboratory
High density rubber latex membrane used. Specimen cut with longest axis in a vertical orientation.
Sushil Sharda28/03/2014
1
130
187.71
187
1.19
0.362
24
2.13
1.72
103.17
197.43
17.2
1.01
Compound
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
%/min
Mg/m3
Mg/m3
%
kPa
Bulk density
mm
%
mm
mm
Membrane thickness
Moisture content
Cu
Rate of strain
Mode of failure
Test type
Test number
Dry density
Diameter
Length
Failure strain
Corrected deviator stress
Membrane correction
0
50
100
150
200
0 5 10 15 20
Dev
iato
r st
ress
kP
a
Strain %
Description
Shear strength parameters c kPa φ ° Apparent c kPa
Undisturbed Single stage
Remarks
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
2
Deviator stress
Cell pressure
73 0.0
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
73
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
024
Sample Type
Undrained Triaxial
Compression Without
Measurement Of Pore
Pressure (Definitive Method)
Project No. TA7329
Hole ID
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
8.50m
Sample Number
BH03
Sample Depth
73
Brown slightly gravelly fine CLAY.
U
Specimen Depth
8.52m
Tested in accordance with contract
specification
Specimen Number
2.04 Issue Date 21/11/2012
Leeds Laboratory
High density rubber latex membrane used. Specimen cut with longest axis in a vertical orientation.
Sushil Sharda28/03/2014
1
170
146.58
145
1.36
0.352
31
1.99
1.52
103.73
196.50
21.4
1678.43
Compound
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
%/min
Mg/m3
Mg/m3
%
kPa
Bulk density
mm
%
mm
mm
Membrane thickness
Moisture content
Cu
Rate of strain
Mode of failure
Test type
Test number
Dry density
Diameter
Length
Failure strain
Corrected deviator stress
Membrane correction
0
50
100
150
200
0 5 10 15 20 25
Dev
iato
r st
ress
kP
a
Strain %
Description
Shear strength parameters c kPa φ ° Apparent c kPa
Undisturbed Single stage
Remarks
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
2
Deviator stress
Cell pressure
56 0.0
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
56
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
021
Sample Type
Undrained Triaxial
Compression Without
Measurement Of Pore
Pressure (Definitive Method)
Project No. TA7329
Hole ID
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
7.00m
Sample Number
BH05
Sample Depth
56
Dark brown very sandy CLAY with rare subrounded gravel.
U
Specimen Depth
7.10m
BS1377: Part 7: 1990: 8
Specimen Number
2.04 Issue Date 21/11/2012
Leeds Laboratory
High density rubber latex membrane used. Specimen cut with longest axis in a vertical orientation.
Sushil Sharda28/03/2014
1
150
112.91
112
0.99
0.382
26
2.14
1.70
101.96
196.83
12.2
2.05
Compound
kPa
kPa
kPa
kPa
%/min
Mg/m3
Mg/m3
%
kPa
Bulk density
mm
%
mm
mm
Membrane thickness
Moisture content
Cu
Rate of strain
Mode of failure
Test type
Test number
Dry density
Diameter
Length
Failure strain
Corrected deviator stress
Membrane correction
0
50
100
150
200
0 5 10 15
Dev
iato
r st
ress
kP
a
Strain %
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION BLaboratory Testing
LABORATORY ROCK TESTSUMMARY SHEETS
section title sheets x25.indd 16 14/03/2013 16:17
% kg/m³ kg/m³ Mg/m³ MN/m² MN/m² MN/m² MN/m² % GPa
L01 C 01 I+P 1.06 0.88
L01 C 02 I+P 0.32 0.24
L02 C 01 D+L 0.01 0.01
L02 C 02 A+P+X 0.15 0.16
L03 C 01 D+L 0.01 0.01
L03 C 02 A+P 0.06 0.07
L04 C 01 A+P+X 0.03 0.03
L04 C 02 A+P+X 0.09 0.11
L05 C 01 D+L+X 0.01 0.02
L05 C 02 A+P 0.04 0.05
L06 C 01 A+P 0.17 0.19
L06 C 02 I+L 0.11 0.11
L07 C 01 A+P+X 0.04 0.05
L07 C 02 I+L+X 0.05 0.06
L08 C 01 D+L+X 0.01 0.02
L08 C 02 A+P 0.00 0.00
L09 C 01 A+P 0.08 0.10
L09 C 02 A+P 0.08 0.09
L10 C 01 D+L 0.10 0.13
L10 C 02 A+P+X 0.10 0.11
Approved by:
Stuart Kirk
Revision No. 2.03 Issue Date 20/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
BH01 16.850 16.850
Leeds Laboratory
BH01 16.150 16.150
BH01 16.850 16.850
BH01 15.700 15.700
BH01 16.150 16.150
BH01 15.300 15.300
BH01 15.700 15.700
BH01 14.800 14.800
BH01 15.300 15.300
BH01 14.100 14.100
BH01 14.800 14.800
BH01 13.550 13.550
BH01 14.100 14.100
BH01 13.200 13.200
BH01 13.550 13.550
BH01 12.900 12.900
BH01 13.200 13.200
BH01 12.200 12.200
BH01 12.900 12.900
Par
ticl
e den
sity
Spec
imen
no.
Bra
zil
Print date 28/03/2014
Is50Sa
mple
typ
e
Bulk
Den
sity
Summary Of Laboratory
Rock Strength TestsProject No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
Spec
imen
dep
th m
12.200
Sam
ple
dep
th m
12.200
Hole
ID
BH01
Poro
sity
UCS
Is
Sam
ple
no.
Dry
Den
sity
Wat
er C
onte
nt
Point load
Typ
e Posiss
ons Rat
io
Ela
stic
Modulu
s
% kg/m³ kg/m³ Mg/m³ MN/m² MN/m² MN/m² MN/m² % GPa
Par
ticl
e den
sity
Spec
imen
no.
Bra
zil
Is50Sa
mple
typ
e
Bulk
Den
sity
Summary Of Laboratory
Rock Strength TestsProject No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
Spec
imen
dep
th m
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Hole
ID
Poro
sity
UCS
Is
Sam
ple
no.
Dry
Den
sity
Wat
er C
onte
nt
Point load
Typ
e Posiss
ons Rat
io
Ela
stic
Modulu
s
L11 C 01 D+L+X 0.30 0.38
L11 C 02 A+P 0.60 0.69
L12 C 01 D+L+X 0.10 0.12
L12 C 02 A+P 0.11 0.13
L13 C 01 D+L 0.06 0.07
L13 C 02 A+P 0.04 0.05
L14 C 01 D+L+X 0.10 0.13
L14 C 02 A+P 0.08 0.09
L15 C 01 D+L+X 0.04 0.06
L15 C 02 A+P 0.07 0.09
L16 C 01 D+L+X 0.00 0.00
L16 C 02 A+P+X 0.10 0.11
L01 C 01 I+P 0.13 0.13
L01 C 02 I+P+X 0.12 0.10
L02 C 01 A+P 0.09 0.10
L02 C 02 A+P 0.08 0.08
L03 C 01 I+P+X 0.08 0.07
L03 C 02 I+P+X 0.17 0.16
L04 C 01 D+L 0.01 0.01
L04 C 02 A+P+X 0.08 0.09
Approved by:
Stuart Kirk
Revision No. 2.03 Issue Date 20/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Leeds Laboratory
Print date 28/03/2014
BH02 12.650 12.650
BH02 12.300 12.300
BH02 12.650 12.650
BH02 11.750 11.750
BH02 12.300 12.300
BH02 11.300 11.300
BH02 11.750 11.750
BH01 19.900 19.900
BH02 11.300 11.300
BH01 19.350 19.350
BH01 19.900 19.900
BH01 18.850 18.850
BH01 19.350 19.350
BH01 18.400 18.400
BH01 18.850 18.850
BH01 17.800 17.800
BH01 18.400 18.400
BH01 17.350 17.350
BH01 17.800 17.800
BH01 17.350 17.350
% kg/m³ kg/m³ Mg/m³ MN/m² MN/m² MN/m² MN/m² % GPa
Par
ticl
e den
sity
Spec
imen
no.
Bra
zil
Is50Sa
mple
typ
e
Bulk
Den
sity
Summary Of Laboratory
Rock Strength TestsProject No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
Spec
imen
dep
th m
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Hole
ID
Poro
sity
UCS
Is
Sam
ple
no.
Dry
Den
sity
Wat
er C
onte
nt
Point load
Typ
e Posiss
ons Rat
io
Ela
stic
Modulu
s
L05 C 01 I+P 0.99 0.81
L05 C 02 I+P 1.69 1.25
L06 C 01 D+L 0.00 0.00
L06 C 02 A+P 0.01 0.01
L07 C 01 A+P+X 0.05 0.07
L07 C 02 A+P+X 0.06 0.07
L08 C 01 I+P+X 0.11 0.10
L08 C 02 I+P+X 0.04 0.04
L09 C 01 D+L 0.00 0.00
L09 C 02 A+P+X 0.04 0.04
L10 C 01 A+P 0.34 0.42
L10 C 02 A+P 0.25 0.30
L11 C 01 D+L+X 0.04 0.05
L11 C 02 A+P+X 0.01 0.01
L12 C 01 A+P+X 0.06 0.08
L12 C 02 I+L 0.13 0.15
L13 C 01 I+P 0.15 0.14
L13 C 02 I+P 0.72 0.63
L14 C 01 I+P+X 0.12 0.11
L14 C 02 I+P 0.18 0.18
Approved by:
Stuart Kirk
Revision No. 2.03 Issue Date 20/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Leeds Laboratory
Print date 28/03/2014
BH02 18.000 18.000
BH02 17.500 17.500
BH02 18.000 18.000
BH02 16.900 16.900
BH02 17.500 17.500
BH02 16.250 16.250
BH02 16.900 16.900
BH02 15.700 15.700
BH02 16.250 16.250
BH02 15.200 15.200
BH02 15.700 15.700
BH02 14.600 14.600
BH02 15.200 15.200
BH02 14.100 14.100
BH02 14.600 14.600
BH02 13.680 13.680
BH02 14.100 14.100
BH02 13.000 13.000
BH02 13.680 13.680
BH02 13.000 13.000
% kg/m³ kg/m³ Mg/m³ MN/m² MN/m² MN/m² MN/m² % GPa
Par
ticl
e den
sity
Spec
imen
no.
Bra
zil
Is50Sa
mple
typ
e
Bulk
Den
sity
Summary Of Laboratory
Rock Strength TestsProject No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
Spec
imen
dep
th m
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Hole
ID
Poro
sity
UCS
Is
Sam
ple
no.
Dry
Den
sity
Wat
er C
onte
nt
Point load
Typ
e Posiss
ons Rat
io
Ela
stic
Modulu
s
L15 C 01 A+P 0.08 0.09
L15 C 02 I+L+X 0.00 0.00
L16 C 01 D+L 0.02 0.02
L16 C 02 A+P+X 0.36 0.43
L17 C 01 D+L 0.27 0.33
L17 C 02 A+P 0.75 0.85
L18 C 01 D+L 0.41 0.51
L18 C 02 A+P+X 0.14 0.18
L19 C 01 D+L 0.01 0.01
L19 C 02 A+P 0.36 0.39
L20 C 01 D+L 0.01 0.01
L20 C 02 I+P 0.28 0.26
L01 C 01 I+P 0.35 0.30
L01 C 02 I+P 0.07 0.06
L02 C 01 D+L 0.04 0.04
L02 C 02 A+P 0.05 0.06
L03 C 01 A+P 0.47 0.46
L03 C 02 I+P 0.49 0.44
L04 C 01 D+L 0.02 0.03
L04 C 02 A+P 0.04 0.05
Approved by:
Stuart Kirk
Revision No. 2.03 Issue Date 20/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Leeds Laboratory
Print date 28/03/2014
BH04 13.830 13.830
BH04 13.000 13.000
BH04 13.830 13.830
BH04 12.700 12.700
BH04 13.000 13.000
BH04 12.000 12.000
BH04 12.700 12.700
BH02 20.400 20.400
BH04 12.000 12.000
BH02 19.850 19.850
BH02 20.400 20.400
BH02 19.400 19.400
BH02 19.850 19.850
BH02 19.170 19.170
BH02 19.400 19.400
BH02 18.860 18.860
BH02 19.170 19.170
BH02 18.500 18.500
BH02 18.860 18.860
BH02 18.500 18.500
% kg/m³ kg/m³ Mg/m³ MN/m² MN/m² MN/m² MN/m² % GPa
Par
ticl
e den
sity
Spec
imen
no.
Bra
zil
Is50Sa
mple
typ
e
Bulk
Den
sity
Summary Of Laboratory
Rock Strength TestsProject No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
Spec
imen
dep
th m
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Hole
ID
Poro
sity
UCS
Is
Sam
ple
no.
Dry
Den
sity
Wat
er C
onte
nt
Point load
Typ
e Posiss
ons Rat
io
Ela
stic
Modulu
s
L05 C 01 A+P 0.11 0.12
L05 C 02 I+P 0.02 0.02
L06 C 01 D+L 0.07 0.09
L06 C 02 A+P+X 0.23 0.26
L07 C 01 D+L 0.05 0.06
L07 C 02 A+P+X 0.05 0.06
L08 C 01 D+L 0.02 0.02
L08 C 02 A+P+X 0.08 0.10
L09 C 01 D+L+X 0.00 0.00
L09 C 02 A+P+X 0.01 0.02
L10 C 01 D+L+X 0.03 0.04
L10 C 02 A+P 0.12 0.14
L11 C 01 A+P+X 0.19 0.22
L11 C 02 A+P+X 0.26 0.26
L12 C 01 D+L 0.09 0.11
L12 C 02 A+P+X 0.15 0.17
L13 C 01 D+L+X 0.04 0.05
L13 C 02 A+P 0.38 0.40
L14 C 01 D+L 0.10 0.12
L14 C 02 A+P 0.11 0.13
End
Approved by:
Stuart Kirk
Revision No. 2.03 Issue Date 20/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Leeds Laboratory
Print date 28/03/2014
BH04 19.630 19.630
BH04 19.200 19.200
BH04 19.630 19.630
BH04 18.450 18.450
BH04 19.200 19.200
BH04 17.800 17.800
BH04 18.450 18.450
BH04 17.300 17.300
BH04 17.800 17.800
BH04 16.850 16.850
BH04 17.300 17.300
BH04 16.250 16.250
BH04 16.850 16.850
BH04 15.550 15.550
BH04 16.250 16.250
BH04 14.750 14.750
BH04 15.550 15.550
BH04 14.200 14.200
BH04 14.750 14.750
BH04 14.200 14.200
% kg/m³ kg/m³ Mg/m³ MN/m² MN/m² MN/m² MN/m² % GPa
Par
ticl
e den
sity
Spec
imen
no.
Bra
zil
Is50Sa
mple
typ
e
Bulk
Den
sity
Summary Of Laboratory
Rock Strength TestsProject No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
Spec
imen
dep
th m
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Hole
ID
Poro
sity
UCS
Is
Sam
ple
no.
Dry
Den
sity
Wat
er C
onte
nt
Point load
Typ
e Posiss
ons Rat
io
Ela
stic
Modulu
s
L15 C 01 A+P 0.41 0.46
L15 C 02 I+L 0.17 0.17
End
Approved by:
Stuart Kirk
Revision No. 2.03
BH04 20.150 20.150
BH04 20.150 20.150
Leeds Laboratory
Print date 28/03/2014
Issue Date 20/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION BLaboratory Testing
LABORATORY ROCK TESTDATA SHEETS
section title sheets x25.indd 17 14/03/2013 16:17
C L01 1 I+P 49.53 20.90 17.16 1.150 32.90 1.06 0.83 0.88
C L01 2 I+P 46.82 15.27 11.64 0.225 26.34 0.32 0.75 0.24
C L02 1 D+L 84.75 84.42 82.50 0.075 83.45 0.01 1.26 0.01
C L02 2 A+P+X 84.59 49.47 34.84 0.555 61.26 0.15 1.10 0.16
C L03 1 D+L 81.41 81.05 79.42 0.050 80.23 0.01 1.24 0.01
C L03 2 A+P 81.87 49.14 46.68 0.275 69.76 0.06 1.16 0.07
C L04 1 A+P+X 85.96 64.12 53.33 0.150 76.40 0.03 1.21 0.03
C L04 2 A+P+X 84.90 48.74 42.75 0.425 67.98 0.09 1.15 0.11
C L05 1 D+L+X 85.83 85.81 82.94 0.100 84.36 0.01 1.27 0.02
C L05 2 A+P 86.07 57.34 53.90 0.250 76.86 0.04 1.21 0.05
C L06 1 A+P 85.95 46.85 37.95 0.700 64.44 0.17 1.12 0.19
C L06 2 I+L 53.95 36.62 36.30 0.275 49.93 0.11 1.00 0.11
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 2.03 Issue Date 01/10/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Leeds Laboratory
Stuart Kirk 28/03/2014
BH01 14.80 14.80Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 14.80 14.80Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 14.10 14.10Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 14.10 14.10Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 13.55 13.55Thinly laminated grey MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 13.55 13.55Thinly laminated grey MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 13.20 13.20Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 13.20 13.20Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
12.90Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 12.90 12.90Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veinsTy
pe
W m
m
Description
12.20 Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
F Is(5
0)
MN
/m2
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Point Load Index Result
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
TA7329Project No.
Is M
N/m
2
Spec
imen
ref
.
Sam
ple
typ
e
D m
m
De
mm
P k
N
Test Result
Sam
ple
no.
Burton and South Derbyshire College Test method: ISRM 1985 : Suggested
Method
Hole
ID
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Client
Spec
imen
dep
th m
D'
mm
12.20
BH01 12.20
BH01 12.90
BH01
12.20 Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
Type
W m
m
Description F Is(5
0)
MN
/m2
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Point Load Index Result
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
TA7329Project No.
Is M
N/m
2
Spec
imen
ref
.
Sam
ple
typ
e
D m
m
De
mm
P k
N
Test Result
Sam
ple
no.
Burton and South Derbyshire College Test method: ISRM 1985 : Suggested
Method
Hole
ID
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Client
Spec
imen
dep
th m
D'
mm
C L07 1 A+P+X 86.61 56.42 52.48 0.250 76.07 0.04 1.21 0.05
C L07 2 I+L+X 56.54 54.26 50.56 0.200 60.33 0.05 1.09 0.06
C L08 1 D+L+X 88.70 89.94 87.01 0.100 88.46 0.01 1.29 0.02
C L08 2 A+P 88.70 48.63 44.64 0.000 71.00 0.00 1.17 0.00
C L09 1 A+P 84.32 52.70 49.81 0.450 73.13 0.08 1.19 0.10
C L09 2 A+P 84.18 46.13 43.27 0.375 68.10 0.08 1.15 0.09
C L10 1 D+L 85.99 85.18 81.09 0.700 83.11 0.10 1.26 0.13
C L10 2 A+P+X 85.84 50.48 46.80 0.500 71.52 0.10 1.17 0.11
C L11 1 D+L+X 84.82 84.66 79.03 2.025 81.80 0.30 1.25 0.38
C L11 2 A+P 84.23 54.75 41.69 2.700 66.87 0.60 1.14 0.69
C L12 1 D+L+X 85.87 83.73 79.01 0.650 81.34 0.10 1.24 0.12
C L12 2 A+P 86.17 56.01 49.67 0.600 73.82 0.11 1.19 0.13
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Stuart Kirk 28/03/2014
2.03 Issue Date 01/10/2012
Leeds Laboratory
BH01 17.80 17.80Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 17.80 17.80Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 17.35 17.35Thinly laminated brown mottled grey
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH01 17.35 17.35Thinly laminated brown mottled grey
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH01 16.85 16.85Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 16.85 16.85Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 16.15 16.15Thinly laminated brown mottled grey
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH01 16.15 16.15Thinly laminated brown mottled grey
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH01 15.70 15.70Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 15.70 15.70Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 15.30 15.30Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 15.30 15.30Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
Type
W m
m
Description F Is(5
0)
MN
/m2
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Point Load Index Result
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
TA7329Project No.
Is M
N/m
2
Spec
imen
ref
.
Sam
ple
typ
e
D m
m
De
mm
P k
N
Test Result
Sam
ple
no.
Burton and South Derbyshire College Test method: ISRM 1985 : Suggested
Method
Hole
ID
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Client
Spec
imen
dep
th m
D'
mm
C L13 1 D+L 86.19 86.15 83.18 0.400 84.65 0.06 1.27 0.07
C L13 2 A+P 86.54 66.62 62.47 0.250 82.97 0.04 1.26 0.05
C L14 1 D+L+X 86.22 86.07 83.12 0.750 84.58 0.10 1.27 0.13
C L14 2 A+P 86.35 44.84 41.19 0.350 67.29 0.08 1.14 0.09
C L15 1 D+L+X 88.08 86.45 84.27 0.325 85.35 0.04 1.27 0.06
C L15 2 A+P 86.53 66.80 63.71 0.475 83.78 0.07 1.26 0.09
C L16 1 D+L+X 85.57 85.72 85.72 0.000 85.72 0.00 1.27 0.00
C L16 2 A+P+X 85.67 38.99 35.07 0.375 61.85 0.10 1.10 0.11
C L01 1 I+P 82.36 26.11 21.71 0.300 47.71 0.13 0.98 0.13
C L01 2 I+P+X 44.73 24.57 22.41 0.150 35.73 0.12 0.86 0.10
C L02 1 A+P 81.66 48.31 44.62 0.400 68.11 0.09 1.15 0.10
C L02 2 A+P 82.14 39.37 34.36 0.275 59.95 0.08 1.09 0.08
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 2.03 Issue Date 01/10/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Leeds Laboratory
Stuart Kirk 28/03/2014
BH02 11.75 11.75Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 11.75 11.75Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 11.30 11.30Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 11.30 11.30Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 19.90 19.90Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 19.90 19.90Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 19.35 19.35Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 19.35 19.35Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 18.85 18.85Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 18.85 18.85Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 18.40 18.40Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH01 18.40 18.40Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
Type
W m
m
Description F Is(5
0)
MN
/m2
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Point Load Index Result
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
TA7329Project No.
Is M
N/m
2
Spec
imen
ref
.
Sam
ple
typ
e
D m
m
De
mm
P k
N
Test Result
Sam
ple
no.
Burton and South Derbyshire College Test method: ISRM 1985 : Suggested
Method
Hole
ID
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Client
Spec
imen
dep
th m
D'
mm
C L03 1 I+P+X 58.60 27.65 21.55 0.125 40.10 0.08 0.91 0.07
C L03 2 I+P+X 61.33 26.99 22.66 0.300 42.07 0.17 0.93 0.16
C L04 1 D+L 81.97 81.61 78.93 0.050 80.26 0.01 1.24 0.01
C L04 2 A+P+X 81.59 49.45 42.44 0.350 66.40 0.08 1.14 0.09
C L05 1 I+P 43.22 22.00 18.37 1.000 31.79 0.99 0.82 0.81
C L05 2 I+P 29.40 20.07 17.37 1.100 25.50 1.69 0.74 1.25
C L06 1 D+L 80.34 79.99 76.77 0.000 78.36 0.00 1.22 0.00
C L06 2 A+P 80.74 64.18 59.62 0.050 78.29 0.01 1.22 0.01
C L07 1 A+P+X 85.13 73.68 67.59 0.375 85.59 0.05 1.27 0.07
C L07 2 A+P+X 84.30 57.25 45.70 0.275 70.04 0.06 1.16 0.07
C L08 1 I+P+X 81.84 37.50 22.82 0.250 48.76 0.11 0.99 0.10
C L08 2 I+P+X 79.36 37.07 34.32 0.125 58.89 0.04 1.08 0.04
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Stuart Kirk 28/03/2014
2.03 Issue Date 01/10/2012
Leeds Laboratory
BH02 14.60 14.60Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 14.60 14.60Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 14.10 14.10Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 14.10 14.10Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 13.68 13.68Thinly laminated grey MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 13.68 13.68Thinly laminated grey MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 13.00 13.00Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 13.00 13.00Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 12.65 12.65Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 12.65 12.65Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 12.30 12.30Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 12.30 12.30Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
Type
W m
m
Description F Is(5
0)
MN
/m2
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Point Load Index Result
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
TA7329Project No.
Is M
N/m
2
Spec
imen
ref
.
Sam
ple
typ
e
D m
m
De
mm
P k
N
Test Result
Sam
ple
no.
Burton and South Derbyshire College Test method: ISRM 1985 : Suggested
Method
Hole
ID
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Client
Spec
imen
dep
th m
D'
mm
C L09 1 D+L 84.27 83.87 81.52 0.025 82.69 0.00 1.25 0.00
C L09 2 A+P+X 82.79 58.15 50.79 0.200 73.17 0.04 1.19 0.04
C L10 1 A+P 82.12 70.62 57.71 2.075 77.68 0.34 1.22 0.42
C L10 2 A+P 84.35 68.14 58.43 1.550 79.22 0.25 1.23 0.30
C L11 1 D+L+X 84.08 83.75 80.47 0.250 82.09 0.04 1.25 0.05
C L11 2 A+P+X 83.96 74.38 73.01 0.050 88.35 0.01 1.29 0.01
C L12 1 A+P+X 84.86 76.31 70.36 0.450 87.19 0.06 1.28 0.08
C L12 2 I+L 75.85 57.08 46.19 0.600 66.79 0.13 1.14 0.15
C L13 1 I+P 52.15 35.11 30.54 0.300 45.03 0.15 0.95 0.14
C L13 2 I+P 43.58 29.82 24.87 1.000 37.15 0.72 0.87 0.63
C L14 1 I+P+X 67.18 36.30 27.93 0.275 48.88 0.12 0.99 0.11
C L14 2 I+P 66.34 34.93 30.80 0.475 51.01 0.18 1.01 0.18
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 2.03 Issue Date 01/10/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Leeds Laboratory
Stuart Kirk 28/03/2014
BH02 18.00 18.00Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 18.00 18.00Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 17.50 17.50 Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
BH02 17.50 17.50 Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
BH02 16.90 16.90Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 16.90 16.90Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 16.25 16.25Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 16.25 16.25Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 15.70 15.70Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 15.70 15.70Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 15.20 15.20Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 15.20 15.20Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
Type
W m
m
Description F Is(5
0)
MN
/m2
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Point Load Index Result
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
TA7329Project No.
Is M
N/m
2
Spec
imen
ref
.
Sam
ple
typ
e
D m
m
De
mm
P k
N
Test Result
Sam
ple
no.
Burton and South Derbyshire College Test method: ISRM 1985 : Suggested
Method
Hole
ID
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Client
Spec
imen
dep
th m
D'
mm
C L15 1 A+P 84.48 49.03 42.58 0.375 67.68 0.08 1.15 0.09
C L15 2 I+L+X 49.89 36.47 35.30 0.000 47.35 0.00 0.98 0.00
C L16 1 D+L 84.91 84.84 82.59 0.125 83.71 0.02 1.26 0.02
C L16 2 A+P+X 84.99 66.19 50.07 1.975 73.61 0.36 1.19 0.43
C L17 1 D+L 86.65 86.50 77.17 1.775 81.70 0.27 1.25 0.33
C L17 2 A+P 86.67 55.03 40.72 3.350 67.03 0.75 1.14 0.85
C L18 1 D+L 86.67 86.47 72.31 2.575 79.07 0.41 1.23 0.51
C L18 2 A+P+X 86.84 67.21 56.89 0.900 79.31 0.14 1.23 0.18
C L19 1 D+L 86.38 86.23 83.46 0.050 84.83 0.01 1.27 0.01
C L19 2 A+P 87.08 41.27 32.87 1.300 60.37 0.36 1.09 0.39
C L20 1 D+L 86.49 86.51 83.46 0.075 84.97 0.01 1.27 0.01
C L20 2 I+P 51.09 28.02 24.40 0.450 39.84 0.28 0.90 0.26
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Stuart Kirk 28/03/2014
2.03 Issue Date 01/10/2012
Leeds Laboratory
BH02 20.40 20.40Thinly laminated brown mottled grey
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH02 20.40 20.40Thinly laminated brown mottled grey
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH02 19.85 19.85Thinly laminated brown mottled grey
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH02 19.85 19.85Thinly laminated brown mottled grey
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH02 19.40 19.40Thinly laminated brown mottled grey
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH02 19.40 19.40Thinly laminated brown mottled grey
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH02 19.17 19.17Thinly laminated brown mottled grey
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH02 19.17 19.17Thinly laminated brown mottled grey
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH02 18.86 18.86Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 18.86 18.86Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 18.50 18.50Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH02 18.50 18.50Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
Type
W m
m
Description F Is(5
0)
MN
/m2
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Point Load Index Result
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
TA7329Project No.
Is M
N/m
2
Spec
imen
ref
.
Sam
ple
typ
e
D m
m
De
mm
P k
N
Test Result
Sam
ple
no.
Burton and South Derbyshire College Test method: ISRM 1985 : Suggested
Method
Hole
ID
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Client
Spec
imen
dep
th m
D'
mm
C L01 1 I+P 59.53 20.38 18.10 0.475 37.04 0.35 0.87 0.30
C L01 2 I+P 75.90 21.38 18.77 0.125 42.59 0.07 0.93 0.06
C L02 1 D+L 85.77 85.49 82.90 0.250 84.19 0.04 1.26 0.04
C L02 2 A+P 85.72 56.72 51.89 0.275 75.26 0.05 1.20 0.06
C L03 1 A+P 84.26 37.17 20.67 1.050 47.09 0.47 0.97 0.46
C L03 2 I+P 48.57 40.22 25.54 0.775 39.74 0.49 0.90 0.44
C L04 1 D+L 83.26 81.88 79.60 0.150 80.73 0.02 1.24 0.03
C L04 2 A+P 82.49 64.84 58.04 0.250 78.08 0.04 1.22 0.05
C L05 1 A+P 85.15 42.80 32.26 0.400 59.14 0.11 1.08 0.12
C L05 2 I+P 77.38 27.14 23.79 0.050 48.41 0.02 0.99 0.02
C L06 1 D+L 84.77 84.24 81.37 0.475 82.79 0.07 1.25 0.09
C L06 2 A+P+X 84.50 49.21 38.37 0.950 64.25 0.23 1.12 0.26
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. 2.03 Issue Date 01/10/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Leeds Laboratory
Stuart Kirk 28/03/2014
BH04 14.75 14.75Thinly laminated grey mottled brown
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH04 14.75 14.75Thinly laminated grey mottled brown
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH04 14.20 14.20Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 14.20 14.20Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 13.83 13.83Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 13.83 13.83Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 13.00 13.00Thinly laminated grey MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 13.00 13.00Thinly laminated grey MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 12.70 12.70Thinly laminated grey MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 12.70 12.70Thinly laminated grey MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 12.00 12.00 Thinly laminated grey MUDSTONE
BH04 12.00 12.00 Thinly laminated grey MUDSTONE
Type
W m
m
Description F Is(5
0)
MN
/m2
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Point Load Index Result
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
TA7329Project No.
Is M
N/m
2
Spec
imen
ref
.
Sam
ple
typ
e
D m
m
De
mm
P k
N
Test Result
Sam
ple
no.
Burton and South Derbyshire College Test method: ISRM 1985 : Suggested
Method
Hole
ID
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Client
Spec
imen
dep
th m
D'
mm
C L07 1 D+L 83.76 82.58 79.31 0.325 80.93 0.05 1.24 0.06
C L07 2 A+P+X 83.67 52.17 48.67 0.255 72.01 0.05 1.18 0.06
C L08 1 D+L 83.51 82.46 80.42 0.125 81.43 0.02 1.25 0.02
C L08 2 A+P+X 82.63 56.29 51.64 0.450 73.71 0.08 1.19 0.10
C L09 1 D+L+X 86.90 85.31 82.22 0.000 83.75 0.00 1.26 0.00
C L09 2 A+P+X 82.40 60.91 52.23 0.075 74.03 0.01 1.19 0.02
C L10 1 D+L+X 84.85 84.44 81.44 0.225 82.93 0.03 1.26 0.04
C L10 2 A+P 85.21 39.02 35.15 0.475 61.75 0.12 1.10 0.14
C L11 1 A+P+X 85.73 62.40 49.36 1.000 73.40 0.19 1.19 0.22
C L11 2 A+P+X 85.44 30.05 25.19 0.700 52.35 0.26 1.02 0.26
C L12 1 D+L 87.23 88.34 81.79 0.650 85.00 0.09 1.27 0.11
C L12 2 A+P+X 88.38 50.05 46.01 0.755 71.95 0.15 1.18 0.17
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No. Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Stuart Kirk 28/03/2014
2.03 Issue Date 01/10/2012
Leeds Laboratory
BH04 18.45 18.45Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 18.45 18.45Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 17.80 17.80Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 17.80 17.80Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 17.30 17.30Thinly laminated grey mottled brown
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH04 17.30 17.30Thinly laminated grey mottled brown
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH04 16.85 16.85Thinly laminated grey mottled brown
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH04 16.85 16.85Thinly laminated grey mottled brown
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH04 16.25 16.25Thinly laminated grey mottled brown
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH04 16.25 16.25Thinly laminated grey mottled brown
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH04 15.55 15.55Thinly laminated grey mottled brown
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
BH04 15.55 15.55Thinly laminated grey mottled brown
MUDSTONE with gypsum veins
Type
W m
m
Description F Is(5
0)
MN
/m2
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Point Load Index Result
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd
TA7329Project No.
Is M
N/m
2
Spec
imen
ref
.
Sam
ple
typ
e
D m
m
De
mm
P k
N
Test Result
Sam
ple
no.
Burton and South Derbyshire College Test method: ISRM 1985 : Suggested
Method
Hole
ID
Sam
ple
dep
th m
Client
Spec
imen
dep
th m
D'
mm
C L13 1 D+L+X 83.79 84.11 80.98 0.250 82.53 0.04 1.25 0.05
C L13 2 A+P 84.26 48.77 29.88 1.225 56.62 0.38 1.06 0.40
C L14 1 D+L 84.46 84.20 80.07 0.650 82.11 0.10 1.25 0.12
C L14 2 A+P 84.63 68.80 63.50 0.725 82.72 0.11 1.25 0.13
C L15 1 A+P 87.15 46.67 35.98 1.650 63.19 0.41 1.11 0.46
C L15 2 I+L 48.50 44.56 42.21 0.450 51.05 0.17 1.01 0.17
Approved by:
Print date
Revision No.
BH04 20.15 20.15Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 20.15 20.15Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 19.63 19.63Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 19.63 19.63Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 19.20 19.20Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
BH04 19.20 19.20Thinly laminated brown MUDSTONE
with gypsum veins
Leeds Laboratory
Stuart Kirk
2.03 Issue Date Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group01/10/2012
28/03/2014
End
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION BLaboratory Testing
ENVIRONMENTAL AND CHEMICAL RESULTS
section title sheets x25.indd 21 14/03/2013 16:17
FAO I Swain
14 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear I Swain
Test Report Number 252877
Your Project Reference TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 6 March 2014.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Keith Jones, Technical Manager
Notes to accompany report:
• The sign < means 'less than'
• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
• n/e means 'not evaluated'
• i/s means 'insufficient sample'
• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
• The results relate only to the items tested
• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet252877
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 6 March 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
14 March 2014
252877AJ91745 AJ91746 AJ91747 AJ91748 AJ91749 AJ91750
BH01 BH01 BH01 BH04 BH04 BH05
003 016 025 006 014 025
21/2/2014 21/2/2014 24/2/2014 19/2/2014 19/2/2014 20/2/2014
0.50m 5.50m 9.00m 1.50m 4.50m 9.00m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2010 pH 2.5 to 1 PH 8.0 9.4 8.7 8.9 9.0 8.92175 Sulfur (total TRL report 447) % M 0.17 0.019 0.022 <0.010 <0.010 0.0172120 Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M 0.47 0.14 0.04 <0.01 0.01 0.022430 Sulfate (total BS1377 HCl extract) 14808798 % M 0.22 0.03 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 0.05
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 07/03/2014 and 12/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 1 of 1
LIMS sample ID range AJ91745 to AJ91754
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 6 March 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
14 March 2014
252877AJ91751 AJ91752 AJ91753 AJ91754
BH05 BH03 BH03 BH03
009 004 017 028
20/2/2014 24/2/2014 25/2/2014 25/2/2014
2.50m 0.50m 5.50m 10.00m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2010 pH 2.5 to 1 PH 8.8 8.2 8.9 8.72175 Sulfur (total TRL report 447) % M <0.01 0.13 <0.01 0.0202120 Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M <0.01 0.30 0.02 0.042430 Sulfate (total BS1377 HCl extract) 14808798 % M <0.01 0.15 <0.01 0.03
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 1 of 1
LIMS sample ID range AJ91745 to AJ91754
FAO Ian Swain
24 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear Ian Swain
Test Report Number 253439
Your Project Reference TA7329 Burton and south Derbyshire UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 14 March 2014.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Keith Jones, Technical Manager
Notes to accompany report:
• The sign < means 'less than'
• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
• n/e means 'not evaluated'
• i/s means 'insufficient sample'
• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
• The results relate only to the items tested
• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet253439
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 1 sample
received 14 March 2014
TA7329 Burton and south Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
24 March 2014
253439AJ95033
BH02
002
18/2/2014
0.50m
SOIL
2010 pH 2.5 to 1 PH 8.02175 Sulfur (total TRL report 447) % M 0.132120 Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M 0.102430 Sulfate (total BS1377 HCl extract) 14808798 % M 0.15
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 14/03/2014 and 21/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 1 of 1
LIMS sample ID range AJ95033 to AJ95033
FAO Ian Swain
25 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear Ian Swain
Test Report Number 253674
Your Project Reference TA7329- Burton and South Derbyshire
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 17 March 2014.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Keith Jones, Technical Manager
Notes to accompany report:
• The sign < means 'less than'
• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
• n/e means 'not evaluated'
• i/s means 'insufficient sample'
• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
• The results relate only to the items tested
• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet253674
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples
received 17 March 2014
TA7329- Burton and South DerbyshireFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
25 March 2014
253674AJ96360 AJ96361
BH02 WS02
023 004
18/2/2014 20/2/2014
7.50m - 8m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL
2010 pH 2.5 to 1 PH 8.8 7.72175 Sulfur (total TRL report 447) % M 0.0782120 Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M 0.03 0.052430 Sulfate (total BS1377 HCl extract) 14808798 % M 0.07
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 18/03/2014 and 24/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 1 of 1
LIMS sample ID range AJ96360 to AJ96361
FAO Ian Swain
09 April 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear Ian Swain
Test Report Number 254735a Amended Test Report
Your Project Reference TA7329- Burton & South Derbyshire UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 31 March 2014.
Please see added sample numbers. Disregard all previous reports.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Keith Jones, Technical Manager
Notes to accompany report:
• The sign < means 'less than'
• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
• n/e means 'not evaluated'
• i/s means 'insufficient sample'
• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
• The results relate only to the items tested
• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet254735
AMENDED LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 7 samples
received 31 March 2014
TA7329- Burton & South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
09 April 2014
254735AK02195 AK02196 AK02197 AK02198 AK02199 AK02200
BH01 BH01 BH01 BH02 BH02 BH04
L17 L18 L19 L21 L22 L16
25/2/2014 26/2/2014 26/2/2014 20/2/2014 20/2/2014 24/2/2014
14.00m 18.00m 20.22m 15.00m 18.00m 17.00m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2010 pH 2.5 to 1 PH 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.7 8.72175 Sulfur (total TRL report 447) % M 1.8 1.4 1.4 4.5 1.8 2.52120 Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M 2.1 3.4 3.3 2.2 3.2 3.12430 Sulfate (total BS1377 HCl extract) 14808798 % M 3.65 4.18 4.00 8.16 5.08 7.32
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 01/04/2014 and 04/04/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 1 of 1
LIMS sample ID range AK02195 to AK02201
AMENDED LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 7 samples
received 31 March 2014
TA7329- Burton & South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
09 April 2014
254735AK02201
BH04
L17
24/2/2014
19.00m
SOIL
2010 pH 2.5 to 1 PH 8.82175 Sulfur (total TRL report 447) % M 1.62120 Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M 3.52430 Sulfate (total BS1377 HCl extract) 14808798 % M 4.44
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 1 of 1
LIMS sample ID range AK02195 to AK02201
FAO I Swain
07 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear I Swain
Test Report Number 251775
Your Project Reference TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 19 February 2014.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Darrell Hall, Director
Notes to accompany report:
• The sign < means 'less than'
• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
• n/e means 'not evaluated'
• i/s means 'insufficient sample'
• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
• The results relate only to the items tested
• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet251775
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ88708 AJ88709 AJ88710 AJ88711 AJ88712 AJ88713
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1010 pH PH U 7.8 8.1 8.2 8.0 8.2 7.81300 Cyanide (total) 57125 mg l-¹ U <0.050 <0.050
Cyanide (free) 57125 mg l-¹ U <0.050 <0.050Thiocyanate 302045 mg l-¹ U <0.50 <0.50
1470 Iron (dissolved) 7439896 µg l-¹ N 20 2501180 Sulfur 7704349 mg l-¹ N 4.0 2.91220 Chloride 16887006 mg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0
Ammoniacal Nitrogen AMM_NITROG mg l-¹ U < 0.01 < 0.011325 Sulfide 18496258 mg l-¹ U <0.050 <0.0501415 Calcium 7440702 mg l-¹ U 35 99
Magnesium 7439954 mg l-¹ U 13 351220 Sulfate 14808798 mg l-¹ U 12 13 5.5 5.9 1.8 8.81450 Arsenic 7440382 µg l-¹ U 5.3 6.5 1.3 7.9 9.8 15
Boron 7440428 µg l-¹ U 64 69Barium 7440393 µg l-¹ U 36 22Beryllium 7440417 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0Cadmium 7440439 µg l-¹ U <0.080 0.083 <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 0.089Chromium 7440473 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Copper 7440508 µg l-¹ U 3.3 1.9 3.5 <1.0 8.8 11Mercury 7439976 µg l-¹ U <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Manganese 7439965 µg l-¹ U <1.0 12Nickel 7440020 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Lead 7439921 µg l-¹ U 2.5 1.2 1.0 3.5 5.0 18Selenium 7782492 µg l-¹ U <1.0 3.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.4
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 1 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ88714 AJ88715 AJ88716 AJ88717
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1010 pH PH U 7.9 8.6 8.4 8.11300 Cyanide (total) 57125 mg l-¹ U <0.050
Cyanide (free) 57125 mg l-¹ U <0.050Thiocyanate 302045 mg l-¹ U <0.50
1470 Iron (dissolved) 7439896 µg l-¹ N 3501180 Sulfur 7704349 mg l-¹ N 3.21220 Chloride 16887006 mg l-¹ U <1.0
Ammoniacal Nitrogen AMM_NITROG mg l-¹ U < 0.011325 Sulfide 18496258 mg l-¹ U <0.0501415 Calcium 7440702 mg l-¹ U 290
Magnesium 7439954 mg l-¹ U 411220 Sulfate 14808798 mg l-¹ U 5.2 9.6 6.7 171450 Arsenic 7440382 µg l-¹ U 18 9.7 3.5 7.3
Boron 7440428 µg l-¹ U 33Barium 7440393 µg l-¹ U 43Beryllium 7440417 µg l-¹ U <1.0Cadmium 7440439 µg l-¹ U <0.080 <0.080 <0.080 0.18Chromium 7440473 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Copper 7440508 µg l-¹ U 7.7 5.2 <1.0 6.1Mercury 7439976 µg l-¹ U <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Manganese 7439965 µg l-¹ U 19Nickel 7440020 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Lead 7439921 µg l-¹ U 12 31 2.8 55Selenium 7782492 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 1 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ88708 AJ88709 AJ88710 AJ88711 AJ88712 AJ88713
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1450 Vanadium 7440622 µg l-¹ U 4.8 19Zinc 7440666 µg l-¹ U 3.7 <1.0 <1.0 2.0 1.8 26
1700 Naphthalene 91203 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthylene 208968 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthene 83329 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Fluorene 86737 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Phenanthrene 85018 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 4Anthracene 120127 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.8Fluoranthene 206440 µg l-¹ N 1.5 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 1.2 8.6Pyrene 129000 µg l-¹ N 1.3 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.9 7.3Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 µg l-¹ N 0.7 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.4 4.6Chrysene 218019 µg l-¹ N 0.8 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.5 5Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 µg l-¹ N 1.2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 4.7Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 µg l-¹ N 0.6 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 3.1Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 µg l-¹ N 1.1 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 4.7Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 µg l-¹ N 0.2 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.8Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 µg l-¹ N 1 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 2.8Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 µg l-¹ N 0.7 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 2.5Total (of 16) PAHs µg l-¹ N 9 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 3.1 49
1760 Benzene 71432 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0Toluene 108883 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0Ethylbenzene 100414 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0m- & p-Xylene 1330207 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0o-Xylene 95476 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0
1790 Acenaphthene µg l-¹ N
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 2 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ88714 AJ88715 AJ88716 AJ88717
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1450 Vanadium 7440622 µg l-¹ U 42Zinc 7440666 µg l-¹ U 12 11 <1.0 7.1
1700 Naphthalene 91203 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthylene 208968 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthene 83329 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Fluorene 86737 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Phenanthrene 85018 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Anthracene 120127 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Fluoranthene 206440 µg l-¹ N <0.01 1.3 <0.01 <0.01Pyrene 129000 µg l-¹ N <0.01 1.1 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Chrysene 218019 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Total (of 16) PAHs µg l-¹ N <0.2 2.4 <0.2 <0.2
1760 Benzene 71432 µg l-¹ U <1.0Toluene 108883 µg l-¹ U <1.0Ethylbenzene 100414 µg l-¹ U <1.0m- & p-Xylene 1330207 µg l-¹ U <1.0o-Xylene 95476 µg l-¹ U <1.0
1790 Acenaphthene µg l-¹ N <0.050
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 2 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ88708 AJ88709 AJ88710 AJ88711 AJ88712 AJ88713
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1790 Acenaphthylene µg l-¹ N
Anthracene µg l-¹ N
Azobenzene µg l-¹ N
Benzo[a]anthracene µg l-¹ N
Benzo[a]pyrene µg l-¹ N
Benzo[b]fluoranthene µg l-¹ N
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene µg l-¹ N
Benzo[k]fluoranthene µg l-¹ N
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane µg l-¹ N
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether µg l-¹ N
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether µg l-¹ N
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate µg l-¹ N
Butylbenzylphthalate µg l-¹ N
Carbazole µg l-¹ N
Chrysene µg l-¹ N
Di-n-butylphthalate µg l-¹ N
Di-n-octylphthalate µg l-¹ N
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene µg l-¹ N
Dibenzofuran µg l-¹ N
Diethylphthalate µg l-¹ N
Dimethylphthalate µg l-¹ N
Fluoranthene µg l-¹ N
Fluorene µg l-¹ N
Hexachlorobenzene µg l-¹ N
Hexachlorobutadiene µg l-¹ N
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 3 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ88714 AJ88715 AJ88716 AJ88717
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1790 Acenaphthylene µg l-¹ N <0.050Anthracene µg l-¹ N <0.050Azobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.050Benzo[a]anthracene µg l-¹ N <0.050Benzo[a]pyrene µg l-¹ N <0.050Benzo[b]fluoranthene µg l-¹ N <0.050Benzo[g,h,i]perylene µg l-¹ N <0.050Benzo[k]fluoranthene µg l-¹ N <0.050bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane µg l-¹ N <0.050bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether µg l-¹ N <0.050bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether µg l-¹ N <0.050bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate µg l-¹ N <0.050Butylbenzylphthalate µg l-¹ N <0.050Carbazole µg l-¹ N <0.050Chrysene µg l-¹ N <0.050Di-n-butylphthalate µg l-¹ N <0.050Di-n-octylphthalate µg l-¹ N <0.050Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene µg l-¹ N <0.050Dibenzofuran µg l-¹ N <0.050Diethylphthalate µg l-¹ N <0.050Dimethylphthalate µg l-¹ N <0.050Fluoranthene µg l-¹ N <0.050Fluorene µg l-¹ N <0.050Hexachlorobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.050Hexachlorobutadiene µg l-¹ N <0.050
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 3 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ88708 AJ88709 AJ88710 AJ88711 AJ88712 AJ88713
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1790 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene µg l-¹ N
Hexachloroethane µg l-¹ N
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene µg l-¹ N
Isophorone µg l-¹ N
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine µg l-¹ N
Naphthalene µg l-¹ N
Nitrobenzene µg l-¹ N
Pentachlorophenol µg l-¹ N
Phenanthrene µg l-¹ N
Phenol µg l-¹ N
Pyrene µg l-¹ N
1,2-Dichlorobenzene µg l-¹ N
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene µg l-¹ N
1,3-Dichlorobenzene µg l-¹ N
1,4-Dichlorobenzene µg l-¹ N
2-Chloronaphthalene µg l-¹ N
2-Chlorophenol µg l-¹ N
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol µg l-¹ N
2-Methylnaphthalene µg l-¹ N
2-Methylphenol µg l-¹ N
2-Nitroaniline µg l-¹ N
2-Nitrophenol µg l-¹ N
2,4-Dichlorophenol µg l-¹ N
2,4-Dimethylphenol µg l-¹ N
2,4-Dinitrotoluene µg l-¹ N
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 4 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ88714 AJ88715 AJ88716 AJ88717
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1790 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene µg l-¹ N <0.050Hexachloroethane µg l-¹ N <0.050Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene µg l-¹ N <0.050Isophorone µg l-¹ N <0.050N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine µg l-¹ N <0.050Naphthalene µg l-¹ N <0.050Nitrobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.050Pentachlorophenol µg l-¹ N <0.050Phenanthrene µg l-¹ N <0.050Phenol µg l-¹ N <0.050Pyrene µg l-¹ N <0.0501,2-Dichlorobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.0501,2,4-Trichlorobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.0501,3-Dichlorobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.0501,4-Dichlorobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.0502-Chloronaphthalene µg l-¹ N <0.0502-Chlorophenol µg l-¹ N <0.0502-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol µg l-¹ N <0.0502-Methylnaphthalene µg l-¹ N <0.0502-Methylphenol µg l-¹ N <0.0502-Nitroaniline µg l-¹ N <0.0502-Nitrophenol µg l-¹ N <0.0502,4-Dichlorophenol µg l-¹ N <0.0502,4-Dimethylphenol µg l-¹ N <0.0502,4-Dinitrotoluene µg l-¹ N <0.050
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 4 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ88708 AJ88709 AJ88710 AJ88711 AJ88712 AJ88713
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1790 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol µg l-¹ N
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol µg l-¹ N
2,6-Dinitrotoluene µg l-¹ N
3-Nitroaniline µg l-¹ N
4-Bromophenylphenylether µg l-¹ N
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol µg l-¹ N
4-Chloroaniline µg l-¹ N
4-Chlorophenylphenylether µg l-¹ N
4-Methylphenol µg l-¹ N
4-Nitroaniline µg l-¹ N
1792 Tentatively Identified Compounds ug l-¹
1900 2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 88857 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00024-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59507 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022-Chlorophenol 95578 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,4-Dichlorophenol 120832 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,6-Dichlorophenol 87650 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 534521 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022-Methylphenol 95487 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00023-Methylphenol 108394 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00024-Methylphenol 106445 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022-Nitrophenol 88755 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00024-Nitrophenol 100027 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.0002Pentachlorophenol 87865 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.0002
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 5 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ88714 AJ88715 AJ88716 AJ88717
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1790 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol µg l-¹ N <0.0502,4,6-Trichlorophenol µg l-¹ N <0.0502,6-Dinitrotoluene µg l-¹ N <0.0503-Nitroaniline µg l-¹ N <0.0504-Bromophenylphenylether µg l-¹ N <0.0504-Chloro-3-methylphenol µg l-¹ N <0.0504-Chloroaniline µg l-¹ N <0.0504-Chlorophenylphenylether µg l-¹ N <0.0504-Methylphenol µg l-¹ N <0.0504-Nitroaniline µg l-¹ N <0.050
1792 Tentatively Identified Compounds ug l-¹ not detected1900 2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 88857 mg l-¹ N <0.0002
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59507 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Chlorophenol 95578 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4-Dichlorophenol 120832 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,6-Dichlorophenol 87650 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 534521 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Methylphenol 95487 mg l-¹ N <0.00023-Methylphenol 108394 mg l-¹ N <0.00024-Methylphenol 106445 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Nitrophenol 88755 mg l-¹ N <0.00024-Nitrophenol 100027 mg l-¹ N <0.0002Pentachlorophenol 87865 mg l-¹ N <0.0002
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 5 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ88708 AJ88709 AJ88710 AJ88711 AJ88712 AJ88713
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1900 Phenol 108952 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 4901513 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58902 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 935955 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,3,4-Trichlorophenol 15950660 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,3,5-Trichlorophenol 933788 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,3,6-Trichlorophenol 933755 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00023,4,5-Trichlorophenol 609198 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.0002
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 6 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ88714 AJ88715 AJ88716 AJ88717
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1900 Phenol 108952 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 4901513 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58902 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 935955 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,4-Trichlorophenol 15950660 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,5-Trichlorophenol 933788 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,6-Trichlorophenol 933755 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 mg l-¹ N <0.00023,4,5-Trichlorophenol 609198 mg l-¹ N <0.0002
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 6 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85585 AJ85587 AJ85588 AJ85590 AJ85592 AJ85594
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2010 pH M 8.0 8.2 8.7 7.9 8.2 7.72300 Cyanide (free) 57125 mg kg-¹ M <0.50 <0.50
Cyanide (total) 57125 mg kg-¹ M <0.50 <0.50Thiocyanate 302045 mg kg-¹ M <5.0 <5.0
2175 Sulfur (total TRL report 447) % M 0.19 0.039 0.024 0.17 0.017 0.142120 Boron (hot water soluble) 7440428 mg kg-¹ M 2.0 2.0 0.5 1.3 <0.4 2.9
Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M 0.03 0.01 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.052430 Iron 7439896 mg kg-¹ N 20000 16000 7700 23000 5300 180002450 Arsenic 7440382 mg kg-¹ M 18 12 <2.0 34 <2.0 26
Barium 7440393 mg kg-¹ M 380 340 61 390 72 730Beryllium 7440417 mg kg-¹ M 2.9 1.1 <1.00 3.1 <1.00 3.9Cadmium 7440439 mg kg-¹ M 0.71 0.25 <0.10 0.45 <0.10 1.6Chromium 7440473 mg kg-¹ M 28 13 8.1 35 7.2 26Copper 7440508 mg kg-¹ M 140 33 9.6 380 9.9 140Mercury 7439976 mg kg-¹ M 0.18 0.81 <0.10 0.31 <0.10 1.3Nickel 7440020 mg kg-¹ M 52 14 7.1 34 5.6 55Lead 7439921 mg kg-¹ M 400 51 7.9 520 11 570Selenium 7782492 mg kg-¹ M <0.20 0.20 <0.20 0.24 <0.20 0.69Vanadium 7440622 mg kg-¹ M 49 23 5.4 62 5.6 40Zinc 7440666 mg kg-¹ M 440 42 <10 520 <10 610
2675 TPH aliphatic >C5-C6 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C6-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ M < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 7 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85595 AJ85596 AJ85597 AJ85598
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2010 pH M 7.7 8.7 7.6 7.42300 Cyanide (free) 57125 mg kg-¹ M <0.50
Cyanide (total) 57125 mg kg-¹ M <0.50Thiocyanate 302045 mg kg-¹ M <5.0
2175 Sulfur (total TRL report 447) % M 0.067 0.086 0.091 0.0712120 Boron (hot water soluble) 7440428 mg kg-¹ M 1.6 1.0 0.9 0.7
Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M <0.01 0.02 <0.01 <0.012430 Iron 7439896 mg kg-¹ N 16000 19000 16000 150002450 Arsenic 7440382 mg kg-¹ M 13 12 6.7 8.7
Barium 7440393 mg kg-¹ M 320 290 82 240Beryllium 7440417 mg kg-¹ M 1.6 <1.00 1.1 <1.00Cadmium 7440439 mg kg-¹ M 0.33 0.35 <0.10 0.14Chromium 7440473 mg kg-¹ M 14 17 10 10Copper 7440508 mg kg-¹ M 49 76 22 13Mercury 7439976 mg kg-¹ M 0.44 0.25 <0.10 <0.10Nickel 7440020 mg kg-¹ M 16 21 15 10Lead 7439921 mg kg-¹ M 160 270 53 48Selenium 7782492 mg kg-¹ M 0.26 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Vanadium 7440622 mg kg-¹ M 22 89 17 15Zinc 7440666 mg kg-¹ M 140 320 47 30
2675 TPH aliphatic >C5-C6 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C6-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ M < 1 2.8 < 1 < 1
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 7 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85585 AJ85587 AJ85588 AJ85590 AJ85592 AJ85594
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2675 TPH aliphatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1TPH aliphatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1TPH aliphatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ M < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1TPH aliphatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1TPH aromatic >C5-C7 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C7-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ N < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 1.4TPH aromatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M 7.4 < 1 < 1 2.1 < 1 7.1TPH aromatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M 18 < 1 < 1 5.5 < 1 65TPH aromatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ N 47 < 1 < 1 12 < 1 110TPH aromatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N 3.0 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 5.8Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons mg kg-¹ N 75 < 10 < 10 20 < 10 190
2760 Methyl tert-butylether low level 1634044 µg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1Dichlorodifluoromethane 75718 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Chloromethane 74873 µg kg-¹ < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Vinyl chloride 75014 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Bromomethane 74839 µg kg-¹ M < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0Chloroethane 75003 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20Trichlorofluoromethane 75694 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloroethene 75354 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Dichloromethane 75092 µg kg-¹ N ne ne ne ne ne netrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156605 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloroethane 75343 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156592 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 8 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85595 AJ85596 AJ85597 AJ85598
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2675 TPH aliphatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M < 1 17 < 1 < 1TPH aliphatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M < 1 24 < 1 < 1TPH aliphatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ M < 1 60 < 1 < 1TPH aliphatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1TPH aromatic >C5-C7 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C7-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 0.34 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ N < 1 18 < 1 < 1TPH aromatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M 4.6 43 < 1 < 1TPH aromatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M 38 110 < 1 < 1TPH aromatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ N 80 150 < 1 < 1TPH aromatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N 7.3 < 1 < 1 < 1Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons mg kg-¹ N 130 420 < 10 < 10
2760 Methyl tert-butylether low level 1634044 µg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1Dichlorodifluoromethane 75718 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Chloromethane 74873 µg kg-¹ < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Vinyl chloride 75014 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Bromomethane 74839 µg kg-¹ M < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0Chloroethane 75003 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20Trichlorofluoromethane 75694 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloroethene 75354 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Dichloromethane 75092 µg kg-¹ N ne ne ne netrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156605 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloroethane 75343 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156592 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 8 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85585 AJ85587 AJ85588 AJ85590 AJ85592 AJ85594
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2760 Bromochloromethane 74975 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Trichloromethane 67663 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1,1-Trichloroethane 71556 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Tetrachloromethane 56235 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloropropene 563586 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Benzene 71432 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichloroethane 107062 µg kg-¹ M < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20Trichloroethene 79016 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichloropropane 78875 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Dibromomethane 74953 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Bromodichloromethane 75274 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061015 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Toluene 108883 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061026 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.01,1,2-Trichloroethane 79005 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Tetrachloroethene 127184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,3-Dichloropropane 142289 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20Dibromochloromethane 124481 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.01,2-Dibromoethane 106934 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Chlorobenzene 108907 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630206 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20Ethylbenzene 100414 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10m- & p-Xylene 1330207 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10o-Xylene 95476 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Styrene 100425 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 9 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85595 AJ85596 AJ85597 AJ85598
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2760 Bromochloromethane 74975 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Trichloromethane 67663 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1,1-Trichloroethane 71556 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Tetrachloromethane 56235 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloropropene 563586 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Benzene 71432 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichloroethane 107062 µg kg-¹ M < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20Trichloroethene 79016 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichloropropane 78875 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Dibromomethane 74953 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Bromodichloromethane 75274 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061015 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Toluene 108883 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061026 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.01,1,2-Trichloroethane 79005 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Tetrachloroethene 127184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,3-Dichloropropane 142289 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20Dibromochloromethane 124481 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.01,2-Dibromoethane 106934 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Chlorobenzene 108907 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630206 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20Ethylbenzene 100414 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10m- & p-Xylene 1330207 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10o-Xylene 95476 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Styrene 100425 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 9 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85585 AJ85587 AJ85588 AJ85590 AJ85592 AJ85594
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2760 Tribromomethane 75252 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Isopropylbenzene 98828 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Bromobenzene 108861 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2,3-Trichloropropane 96184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50n-Propylbenzene 103651 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.102-Chlorotoluene 95498 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95636 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.104-Chlorotoluene 106434 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10tert-Butylbenzene 98066 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108678 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10sec-Butylbenzene 135988 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.104-Isopropyltoluene 99876 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10n-Butylbenzene 104518 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96128 µg kg-¹ N < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.01,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
2790 Phenol 108952 mg kg-¹ N
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 111444 mg kg-¹ N
2-Chlorophenol 95578 mg kg-¹ N
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731 mg kg-¹ N
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 mg kg-¹ N
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 mg kg-¹ N
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 10 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85595 AJ85596 AJ85597 AJ85598
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2760 Tribromomethane 75252 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Isopropylbenzene 98828 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Bromobenzene 108861 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2,3-Trichloropropane 96184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50n-Propylbenzene 103651 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.102-Chlorotoluene 95498 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95636 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.104-Chlorotoluene 106434 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10tert-Butylbenzene 98066 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108678 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10sec-Butylbenzene 135988 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.104-Isopropyltoluene 99876 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10n-Butylbenzene 104518 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96128 µg kg-¹ N < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.01,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
2790 Phenol 108952 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 111444 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Chlorophenol 95578 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 10 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85585 AJ85587 AJ85588 AJ85590 AJ85592 AJ85594
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2790 2-Methylphenol 95487 mg kg-¹ N
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 108601 mg kg-¹ N
4-Methylphenol 106445 mg kg-¹ N
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 621647 mg kg-¹ N
Hexachloroethane 67721 mg kg-¹ N
Nitrobenzene 98953 mg kg-¹ N
Isophorone 78591 mg kg-¹ N
2-Nitrophenol 88755 mg kg-¹ N
2,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 mg kg-¹ N
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 111911 mg kg-¹ N
2,4-Dichlorophenol 120832 mg kg-¹ N
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 mg kg-¹ N
Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ N
4-Chloroaniline 106478 mg kg-¹ N
Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 mg kg-¹ N
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59507 mg kg-¹ N
2-Methylnaphthalene 91576 mg kg-¹ N
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77474 mg kg-¹ N
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 mg kg-¹ N
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 mg kg-¹ N
2-Chloronaphthalene 91587 mg kg-¹ N
2-Nitroaniline 88744 mg kg-¹ N
Dimethylphthalate 131113 mg kg-¹ N
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 606202 mg kg-¹ N
Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ N
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 11 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85595 AJ85596 AJ85597 AJ85598
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2790 2-Methylphenol 95487 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 108601 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Methylphenol 106445 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 621647 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachloroethane 67721 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Nitrobenzene 98953 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Isophorone 78591 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Nitrophenol 88755 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 111911 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dichlorophenol 120832 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Chloroaniline 106478 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59507 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Methylnaphthalene 91576 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77474 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Chloronaphthalene 91587 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Nitroaniline 88744 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Dimethylphthalate 131113 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,6-Dinitrotoluene 606202 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 11 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85585 AJ85587 AJ85588 AJ85590 AJ85592 AJ85594
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2790 3-Nitroaniline 99092 mg kg-¹ N
Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ N
Dibenzofuran 132649 mg kg-¹ N
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121142 mg kg-¹ N
Diethylphthalate 84662 mg kg-¹ N
Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ N
4-Chlorophenylphenylether 7005723 mg kg-¹ N
4-Nitroaniline 100016 mg kg-¹ N
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 534521 mg kg-¹ N
Azobenzene 103333 mg kg-¹ N
4-Bromophenylphenylether 101553 mg kg-¹ N
Hexachlorobenzene 118741 mg kg-¹ N
Pentachlorophenol 87865 mg kg-¹ N
Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ N
Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ N
Carbazole 86748 mg kg-¹ N
Di-n-butylphthalate 84742 mg kg-¹ N
Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ N
Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ N
Butylbenzylphthalate 85687 mg kg-¹ N
Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ N
Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ N
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 117817 mg kg-¹ N
Di-n-octylphthalate 117840 mg kg-¹ N
Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ N
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 12 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85595 AJ85596 AJ85597 AJ85598
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2790 3-Nitroaniline 99092 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Dibenzofuran 132649 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dinitrotoluene 121142 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Diethylphthalate 84662 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Chlorophenylphenylether 7005723 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Nitroaniline 100016 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 534521 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Azobenzene 103333 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Bromophenylphenylether 101553 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachlorobenzene 118741 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Pentachlorophenol 87865 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ N 1.2Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ N 0.32Carbazole 86748 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Di-n-butylphthalate 84742 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ N 3.2Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ N 3.0Butylbenzylphthalate 85687 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 117817 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Di-n-octylphthalate 117840 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 12 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85585 AJ85587 AJ85588 AJ85590 AJ85592 AJ85594
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2790 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ N
Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ N
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ N
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ N
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ N
2,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 mg kg-¹ N
4-Nitrophenol 100027 mg kg-¹ N
2792 Tentatively Identified Compounds mg kg-¹
2800 Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ M 0.23 <0.10 <0.10 0.27 <0.10 1.2Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ N 0.54 <0.10 <0.10 0.42 <0.10 2.5Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ M 0.13 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.42Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ M 0.23 <0.10 <0.10 0.23 <0.10 1.4Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ M 3.4 0.17 <0.10 3.3 <0.10 18Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ M 1.1 <0.10 <0.10 0.93 <0.10 4.6Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ M 9.4 0.31 <0.10 6.8 <0.10 30Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ M 8.5 0.27 <0.10 5.6 <0.10 26Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ M 4.5 0.16 <0.10 3.4 <0.10 14Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ M 4.6 0.14 <0.10 3.4 <0.10 14Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ N 7.1 0.21 <0.10 4 <0.10 16Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ N 3.3 <0.10 <0.10 1.5 <0.10 7.3Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ M 5.9 0.14 <0.10 3.1 <0.10 14Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ N 0.85 <0.10 <0.10 0.5 <0.10 2Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ M 3.2 <0.10 <0.10 1.7 <0.10 6.6Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ M 3.5 <0.10 <0.10 1.9 <0.10 7.1Total (of 16) PAHs mg kg-¹ N 56 <2.0 <2.0 37 <2.0 170
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 13 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85595 AJ85596 AJ85597 AJ85598
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2790 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Nitrophenol 100027 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
2792 Tentatively Identified Compounds mg kg-¹ not detected2800 Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ M 0.12 <0.10 0.1 <0.10
Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ N 0.48 0.22 <0.10 <0.10Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ M <0.10 1.2 <0.10 <0.10Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ M 0.23 0.6 <0.10 <0.10Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ M 2.6 3.5 0.18 <0.10Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ M 0.72 1.1 <0.10 <0.10Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ M 4.8 7.6 0.12 <0.10Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ M 4.2 7.6 <0.10 <0.10Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ M 2.3 3 <0.10 <0.10Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ M 2.3 2.9 <0.10 <0.10Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ N 2.9 5.4 <0.10 <0.10Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ N 1.2 2.3 <0.10 <0.10Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ M 2.3 4.7 <0.10 <0.10Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ N 0.26 0.62 <0.10 <0.10Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ M 1.2 2.6 <0.10 <0.10Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ M 1.3 3.2 <0.10 <0.10Total (of 16) PAHs mg kg-¹ N 27 47 <2.0 <2.0
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 13 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85585 AJ85587 AJ85588 AJ85590 AJ85592 AJ85594
BH02 BH02 BH02 WS01 WS01 WS03
001 005 009 002 007 002
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
0.20m 1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 1.20m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2920 Phenols (total) mg kg-¹ M <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3
All tests undertaken between 20/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 14 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 20 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251775AJ85595 AJ85596 AJ85597 AJ85598
WS03 WS04 WS04 WS04
005 001 002 005
18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014 18/2/2014
1.00m 0.20m 0.50m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2920 Phenols (total) mg kg-¹ M <0.3 30 1.8 <0.3
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 2
Report page 14 of 14
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ88717
FAO I Swain
07 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear I Swain
Test Report Number 251775
Your Project Reference TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 19 February 2014.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Darrell Hall, Director
2183
Notes to accompany report:
• The in-house procedure is employed to identify materials and fibres in soils
• The sample is examined by stereo-binocular and polarised light microscopy
• Sample size is reduced by coning and quartering to obtain a representative sub-sample if necessary
• The bulk identification is in accordance with the requirements of the analyst guide (HSG 248)
• Samples associated with asbestos are retained for six months
• The results relate only to the items tested as supplied by the client
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet251775
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Report Date
07 March 2014
Results of analysis of 10 samples
received 19 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Asbestos in Soils
Login Batch No:
Chemtest ID Sample ID Sample Desc
SOP 2192
ACM Type Asbestos Identification
AJ85585 BH02 001 0.20 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ85587 BH02 005 1.00 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ85588 BH02 009 2.00 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ85590 WS01 002 0.50 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ85592 WS01 007 1.20 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ85594 WS03 002 0.50 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ85595 WS03 005 1.00 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ85596 WS04 001 0.20 Free Fibres ChrysotileAJ85597 WS04 002 0.50 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ85598 WS04 005 1.00 - No Asbestos Detected
Depth (m)
251775
Qualitative Results
The detection limit for this method is 0.001%
Hollis Rosamond
Asbestos Analyst
Signed
All tests undertaken between 07-Mar-2014 and 7-Mar-2014 at our asbestos testing facility in
Coventry
Report page 1 of 1
LIMS sample ID range AJ85585 to AJ85598
FAO I Swain
07 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear I Swain
Test Report Number 251937
Your Project Reference TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 21 February 2014.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Darrell Hall, Director
2183
Notes to accompany report:
• The in-house procedure is employed to identify materials and fibres in soils
• The sample is examined by stereo-binocular and polarised light microscopy
• Sample size is reduced by coning and quartering to obtain a representative sub-sample if necessary
• The bulk identification is in accordance with the requirements of the analyst guide (HSG 248)
• Samples associated with asbestos are retained for six months
• The results relate only to the items tested as supplied by the client
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet251937
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 1 sample
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251937AJ88740
WS05
005
7/3/2014
1.00m
LEACHATE
1010 pH PH U 8.21220 Sulfate 14808798 mg l-¹ U 1.91450 Arsenic 7440382 µg l-¹ U 11
Cadmium 7440439 µg l-¹ U 0.26Chromium 7440473 µg l-¹ U <1.0Copper 7440508 µg l-¹ U 4.2Mercury 7439976 µg l-¹ U <0.50Nickel 7440020 µg l-¹ U <1.0Lead 7439921 µg l-¹ U 15Selenium 7782492 µg l-¹ U 1.9Zinc 7440666 µg l-¹ U 7.8
1700 Naphthalene 91203 µg l-¹ N <0.01Acenaphthylene 208968 µg l-¹ N <0.01Acenaphthene 83329 µg l-¹ N <0.01Fluorene 86737 µg l-¹ N <0.01Phenanthrene 85018 µg l-¹ N <0.01Anthracene 120127 µg l-¹ N <0.01Fluoranthene 206440 µg l-¹ N <0.01Pyrene 129000 µg l-¹ N <0.01Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 µg l-¹ N <0.01Chrysene 218019 µg l-¹ N <0.01Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 µg l-¹ N <0.01Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 µg l-¹ N <0.01Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 µg l-¹ N <0.01
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 1 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86512 to AJ88740
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 1 sample
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251937AJ88740
WS05
005
7/3/2014
1.00m
LEACHATE
1700 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 µg l-¹ N <0.01Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 µg l-¹ N <0.01Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 µg l-¹ N <0.01Total (of 16) PAHs µg l-¹ N <0.2
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 2 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86512 to AJ88740
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251937AJ86514
WS05
005
7/3/2014
1.00m
SOIL
2010 pH M 8.22175 Sulfur (total TRL report 447) % M 0.0722120 Boron (hot water soluble) 7440428 mg kg-¹ M 1.7
Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M <0.012430 Iron 7439896 mg kg-¹ N 120002450 Arsenic 7440382 mg kg-¹ M 8.6
Barium 7440393 mg kg-¹ M 570Beryllium 7440417 mg kg-¹ M 1.4Cadmium 7440439 mg kg-¹ M 0.27Chromium 7440473 mg kg-¹ M 9.2Copper 7440508 mg kg-¹ M 27Mercury 7439976 mg kg-¹ M 0.16Nickel 7440020 mg kg-¹ M 15Lead 7439921 mg kg-¹ M 89Selenium 7782492 mg kg-¹ M <0.20Vanadium 7440622 mg kg-¹ M 12Zinc 7440666 mg kg-¹ M 55
2675 TPH aliphatic >C5-C6 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 ¹TPH aliphatic >C6-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 ¹TPH aliphatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 ¹TPH aliphatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ M < 1 ¹TPH aliphatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M < 1 ¹TPH aliphatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M < 1 ¹TPH aliphatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ M < 1 ¹
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 3 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86512 to AJ88740
¹The sample container/fill level was not appropriate for the specified analysis - these results may be compromised. The accreditation for these results remains unaffected.
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251937AJ86514
WS05
005
7/3/2014
1.00m
SOIL
2675 TPH aliphatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N < 1 ¹TPH aromatic >C5-C7 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 ¹TPH aromatic >C7-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 ¹TPH aromatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 ¹TPH aromatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ N < 1 ¹TPH aromatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M < 1 ¹TPH aromatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M < 1 ¹TPH aromatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ N < 1 ¹TPH aromatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N < 1 ¹Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons mg kg-¹ N < 10 ¹
2760 Methyl tert-butylether low level 1634044 µg kg-¹ N < 0.1 ¹Dichlorodifluoromethane 75718 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹Chloromethane 74873 µg kg-¹ < 0.10 ¹Vinyl chloride 75014 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹Bromomethane 74839 µg kg-¹ M < 2.0 ¹Chloroethane 75003 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 ¹Trichlorofluoromethane 75694 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 ¹1,1-Dichloroethene 75354 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 ¹Dichloromethane 75092 µg kg-¹ N ne ¹trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156605 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹1,1-Dichloroethane 75343 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156592 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹Bromochloromethane 74975 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹Trichloromethane 67663 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71556 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 4 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86512 to AJ88740
¹The sample container/fill level was not appropriate for the specified analysis - these results may be compromised. The accreditation for these results remains unaffected.
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251937AJ86514
WS05
005
7/3/2014
1.00m
SOIL
2760 Tetrachloromethane 56235 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹1,1-Dichloropropene 563586 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹Benzene 71432 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹1,2-Dichloroethane 107062 µg kg-¹ M < 0.20 ¹Trichloroethene 79016 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹1,2-Dichloropropane 78875 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 ¹Dibromomethane 74953 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 ¹Bromodichloromethane 75274 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 ¹cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061015 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 ¹Toluene 108883 µg kg-¹ N 0.52 ¹trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061026 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 ¹1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79005 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 ¹Tetrachloroethene 127184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹1,3-Dichloropropane 142289 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 ¹Dibromochloromethane 124481 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 ¹1,2-Dibromoethane 106934 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 ¹Chlorobenzene 108907 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630206 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 ¹Ethylbenzene 100414 µg kg-¹ N 0.22 ¹m- & p-Xylene 1330207 µg kg-¹ N 0.71 ¹o-Xylene 95476 µg kg-¹ M 0.21 ¹Styrene 100425 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 ¹Tribromomethane 75252 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 ¹Isopropylbenzene 98828 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 ¹Bromobenzene 108861 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 ¹
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 5 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86512 to AJ88740
¹The sample container/fill level was not appropriate for the specified analysis - these results may be compromised. The accreditation for these results remains unaffected.
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251937AJ86514
WS05
005
7/3/2014
1.00m
SOIL
2760 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.50 ¹n-Propylbenzene 103651 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹2-Chlorotoluene 95498 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95636 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 ¹4-Chlorotoluene 106434 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹tert-Butylbenzene 98066 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108678 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 ¹sec-Butylbenzene 135988 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 ¹4-Isopropyltoluene 99876 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 ¹n-Butylbenzene 104518 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 ¹1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96128 µg kg-¹ N < 5.0 ¹1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 ¹Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 ¹
2800 Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ M <0.10Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ N <0.10Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ M <0.10Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ M <0.10Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ M <0.10Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ M <0.10Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ M 0.1Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ M <0.10Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ M <0.10
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 6 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86512 to AJ88740
¹The sample container/fill level was not appropriate for the specified analysis - these results may be compromised. The accreditation for these results remains unaffected.
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
07 March 2014
251937AJ86514
WS05
005
7/3/2014
1.00m
SOIL
2800 Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ M <0.10Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ N 0.1Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ N <0.10Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ M <0.10Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ N <0.10Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ M <0.10Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ M <0.10Total (of 16) PAHs mg kg-¹ N <2.0
2920 Phenols (total) mg kg-¹ M <0.3
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 07/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 7 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86512 to AJ88740
¹The sample container/fill level was not appropriate for the specified analysis - these results may be compromised. The accreditation for these results remains unaffected.
FAO I Swain
07 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear I Swain
Test Report Number 251937
Your Project Reference TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 21 February 2014.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Darrell Hall, Director
Notes to accompany report:
• The sign < means 'less than'
• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
• n/e means 'not evaluated'
• i/s means 'insufficient sample'
• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
• The results relate only to the items tested
• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet251937
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Report Date
07 March 2014
Results of analysis of 1 sample
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Asbestos in Soils
Login Batch No:
Chemtest ID Sample ID Sample Desc
SOP 2192
ACM Type Asbestos Identification
AJ86514 WS05 005 1.00 - No Asbestos Detected
Depth (m)
251937
Qualitative Results
The detection limit for this method is 0.001%
Hollis Rosamond
Asbestos Analyst
Signed
All tests undertaken between 07-Mar-2014 and 7-Mar-2014 at our asbestos testing facility in
Coventry
Report page 1 of 1
LIMS sample ID range AJ86514 to AJ86514
FAO I Swain
06 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear I Swain
Test Report Number 251938
Your Project Reference TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 21 February 2014.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Darrell Hall, Director
Notes to accompany report:
• The sign < means 'less than'
• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
• n/e means 'not evaluated'
• i/s means 'insufficient sample'
• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
• The results relate only to the items tested
• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet251938
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
251938AJ87958 AJ87959
BH04 BH04
001 007
19/2/2014 19/2/2014
0.20m 1.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE
1010 pH PH U 8.0 8.01220 Sulfate 14808798 mg l-¹ U 5.4 6.11450 Arsenic 7440382 µg l-¹ U <1.0 2.7
Cadmium 7440439 µg l-¹ U <0.080 <0.080Chromium 7440473 µg l-¹ U <1.0 120Copper 7440508 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0Mercury 7439976 µg l-¹ U <0.50 <0.50Nickel 7440020 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0Lead 7439921 µg l-¹ U <1.0 3.8Selenium 7782492 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0Zinc 7440666 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0
1700 Naphthalene 91203 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthylene 208968 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthene 83329 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Fluorene 86737 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Phenanthrene 85018 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Anthracene 120127 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Fluoranthene 206440 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Pyrene 129000 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Chrysene 218019 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 1 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86521 to AJ87959
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
251938AJ87958 AJ87959
BH04 BH04
001 007
19/2/2014 19/2/2014
0.20m 1.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE
1700 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Total (of 16) PAHs µg l-¹ N <0.2 <0.2
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 2 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86521 to AJ87959
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
251938AJ86521 AJ86524
BH04 BH04
001 007
19/2/2014 19/2/2014
0.20m 1.50m
SOIL SOIL
2010 pH M 8.8 9.12175 Sulfur (total TRL report 447) % M 0.18 342120 Boron (hot water soluble) 7440428 mg kg-¹ M 0.7 0.5
Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M 0.03 0.452430 Iron 7439896 mg kg-¹ N 15000 100002450 Arsenic 7440382 mg kg-¹ M 11 3.5
Barium 7440393 mg kg-¹ M 520 60Beryllium 7440417 mg kg-¹ M 1.1 <1.00Cadmium 7440439 mg kg-¹ M 0.39 <0.10Chromium 7440473 mg kg-¹ M 140 <5.0Copper 7440508 mg kg-¹ M 53 11Mercury 7439976 mg kg-¹ M 2.2 0.11Nickel 7440020 mg kg-¹ M 27 6.7Lead 7439921 mg kg-¹ M 380 18Selenium 7782492 mg kg-¹ M <0.20 <0.20Vanadium 7440622 mg kg-¹ M 65 <5.0Zinc 7440666 mg kg-¹ M 210 24
2675 TPH aliphatic >C5-C6 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C6-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ M < 1 < 1TPH aliphatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M 4.5 < 1TPH aliphatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M 14 < 1TPH aliphatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ M 78 < 1
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 3 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86521 to AJ87959
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
251938AJ86521 AJ86524
BH04 BH04
001 007
19/2/2014 19/2/2014
0.20m 1.50m
SOIL SOIL
2675 TPH aliphatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N 2.5 < 1TPH aromatic >C5-C7 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C7-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N 1.2 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ N 12 < 1TPH aromatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M 17 < 1TPH aromatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M 38 < 1TPH aromatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ N 130 < 1TPH aromatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N 11 < 1Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons mg kg-¹ N 310 < 10
2760 Methyl tert-butylether low level 1634044 µg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1Dichlorodifluoromethane 75718 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Chloromethane 74873 µg kg-¹ < 0.10 < 0.10Vinyl chloride 75014 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Bromomethane 74839 µg kg-¹ M < 2.0 < 2.0Chloroethane 75003 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20Trichlorofluoromethane 75694 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloroethene 75354 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Dichloromethane 75092 µg kg-¹ N ne netrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156605 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloroethane 75343 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156592 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Bromochloromethane 74975 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Trichloromethane 67663 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,1,1-Trichloroethane 71556 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 4 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86521 to AJ87959
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
251938AJ86521 AJ86524
BH04 BH04
001 007
19/2/2014 19/2/2014
0.20m 1.50m
SOIL SOIL
2760 Tetrachloromethane 56235 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloropropene 563586 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Benzene 71432 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichloroethane 107062 µg kg-¹ M < 0.20 < 0.20Trichloroethene 79016 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichloropropane 78875 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Dibromomethane 74953 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 < 1.0Bromodichloromethane 75274 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 < 0.50cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061015 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0Toluene 108883 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061026 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.01,1,2-Trichloroethane 79005 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 < 1.0Tetrachloroethene 127184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,3-Dichloropropane 142289 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20Dibromochloromethane 124481 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.01,2-Dibromoethane 106934 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 < 0.50Chlorobenzene 108907 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630206 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20Ethylbenzene 100414 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10m- & p-Xylene 1330207 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10o-Xylene 95476 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Styrene 100425 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Tribromomethane 75252 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0Isopropylbenzene 98828 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Bromobenzene 108861 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 5 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86521 to AJ87959
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
251938AJ86521 AJ86524
BH04 BH04
001 007
19/2/2014 19/2/2014
0.20m 1.50m
SOIL SOIL
2760 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.50 < 0.50n-Propylbenzene 103651 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.102-Chlorotoluene 95498 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95636 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.104-Chlorotoluene 106434 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10tert-Butylbenzene 98066 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108678 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10sec-Butylbenzene 135988 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.104-Isopropyltoluene 99876 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10n-Butylbenzene 104518 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96128 µg kg-¹ N < 5.0 < 5.01,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10
2800 Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ M 0.16 <0.10Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ N 0.41 <0.10Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ M <0.10 <0.10Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ M <0.10 <0.10Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ M 1.1 <0.10Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ M 0.57 <0.10Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ M 4 <0.10Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ M 4.7 <0.10Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ M 2.1 <0.10
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 6 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86521 to AJ87959
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
251938AJ86521 AJ86524
BH04 BH04
001 007
19/2/2014 19/2/2014
0.20m 1.50m
SOIL SOIL
2800 Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ M 2.4 <0.10Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ N 9.3 <0.10Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ N 2.9 <0.10Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ M 10 <0.10Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ N 1.2 <0.10Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ M 14 <0.10Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ M 8.4 <0.10Total (of 16) PAHs mg kg-¹ N 61 <2.0
2920 Phenols (total) mg kg-¹ M <0.3 <0.3
All tests undertaken between 24/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 7 of 7
LIMS sample ID range AJ86521 to AJ87959
FAO I Swain
06 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear I Swain
Test Report Number 251938
Your Project Reference TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 21 February 2014.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Darrell Hall, Director
2183
Notes to accompany report:
• The in-house procedure is employed to identify materials and fibres in soils
• The sample is examined by stereo-binocular and polarised light microscopy
• Sample size is reduced by coning and quartering to obtain a representative sub-sample if necessary
• The bulk identification is in accordance with the requirements of the analyst guide (HSG 248)
• Samples associated with asbestos are retained for six months
• The results relate only to the items tested as supplied by the client
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet251938
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Report Date
06 March 2014
Results of analysis of 2 samples
received 21 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO I Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Asbestos in Soils
Login Batch No:
Chemtest ID Sample ID Sample Desc
SOP 2192
ACM Type Asbestos Identification
AJ86521 BH04 001 0.20 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ86524 BH04 007 1.50 - No Asbestos Detected
Depth (m)
251938
Qualitative Results
The detection limit for this method is 0.001%
Lauren Quinn
Asbestos Analyst
Signed
All tests undertaken between 06-Mar-2014 and 6-Mar-2014 at our asbestos testing facility in
Coventry
Report page 1 of 1
LIMS sample ID range AJ86521 to AJ86524
FAO Ian Swain
06 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear Ian Swain
Test Report Number 252054
Your Project Reference TA7329- Burton UTC GI
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 24 February 2014.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Phil Hellier, Director
Notes to accompany report:
• The sign < means 'less than'
• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
• n/e means 'not evaluated'
• i/s means 'insufficient sample'
• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
• The results relate only to the items tested
• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet252054
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 5 samples
received 24 February 2014
TA7329- Burton UTC GIFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
252054AJ87974 AJ87975 AJ87976 AJ87977 AJ87978
BH01 BH01 WS02 WS02 BH01
004 008 002 005 002
21/2/2014 21/2/2014 20/2/2014 20/2/2014 21/2/2014
1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 10.00m 0.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1010 pH PH U 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.41300 Cyanide (total) 57125 mg l-¹ U <0.050
Cyanide (free) 57125 mg l-¹ U <0.050Thiocyanate 302045 mg l-¹ U <0.50
1470 Iron (dissolved) 7439896 µg l-¹ N <201180 Sulfur 7704349 mg l-¹ N 201220 Chloride 16887006 mg l-¹ U 9.6
Ammoniacal Nitrogen AMM_NITROG mg l-¹ U < 0.011325 Sulfide 18496258 mg l-¹ U <0.0501415 Calcium 7440702 mg l-¹ U 40
Magnesium 7439954 mg l-¹ U 6.81220 Sulfate 14808798 mg l-¹ U 38 13 5.3 6.8 611450 Arsenic 7440382 µg l-¹ U 7.7 9.6 3.9 5.4 12
Boron 7440428 µg l-¹ U 280Barium 7440393 µg l-¹ U 16Beryllium 7440417 µg l-¹ U <1.0Cadmium 7440439 µg l-¹ U <0.080 0.08 <0.08 0.10 <0.08Chromium 7440473 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Copper 7440508 µg l-¹ U 2.1 52 <1.0 6.8 4.1Mercury 7439976 µg l-¹ U <0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Manganese 7439965 µg l-¹ U 2.5Nickel 7440020 µg l-¹ U <1.0 1.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Lead 7439921 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 4.8 2.1Selenium 7782492 µg l-¹ U 1.6 1.4 <1.0 <1.0 1.2
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 25/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 1 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ87166 to AJ87978
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 5 samples
received 24 February 2014
TA7329- Burton UTC GIFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
252054AJ87974 AJ87975 AJ87976 AJ87977 AJ87978
BH01 BH01 WS02 WS02 BH01
004 008 002 005 002
21/2/2014 21/2/2014 20/2/2014 20/2/2014 21/2/2014
1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 10.00m 0.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1450 Vanadium 7440622 µg l-¹ U 5.0Zinc 7440666 µg l-¹ U <1.0 16 <1.0 <1.0 7.7
1700 Naphthalene 91203 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthylene 208968 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthene 83329 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Fluorene 86737 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Phenanthrene 85018 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Anthracene 120127 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Fluoranthene 206440 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Pyrene 129000 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Chrysene 218019 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Total (of 16) PAHs µg l-¹ N <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
1760 Benzene 71432 µg l-¹ U <1.0Toluene 108883 µg l-¹ U <1.0Ethylbenzene 100414 µg l-¹ U <1.0m- & p-Xylene 1330207 µg l-¹ U <1.0o-Xylene 95476 µg l-¹ U <1.0
1900 2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 88857 mg l-¹ N <0.0002
All tests undertaken between 25/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 2 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ87166 to AJ87978
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 5 samples
received 24 February 2014
TA7329- Burton UTC GIFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
252054AJ87974 AJ87975 AJ87976 AJ87977 AJ87978
BH01 BH01 WS02 WS02 BH01
004 008 002 005 002
21/2/2014 21/2/2014 20/2/2014 20/2/2014 21/2/2014
1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 10.00m 0.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE LEACHATE
1900 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59507 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Chlorophenol 95578 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4-Dichlorophenol 120832 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,6-Dichlorophenol 87650 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 534521 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Methylphenol 95487 mg l-¹ N <0.00023-Methylphenol 108394 mg l-¹ N <0.00024-Methylphenol 106445 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Nitrophenol 88755 mg l-¹ N <0.00024-Nitrophenol 100027 mg l-¹ N <0.0002Pentachlorophenol 87865 mg l-¹ N <0.0002Phenol 108952 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 4901513 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58902 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 935955 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,4-Trichlorophenol 15950660 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,5-Trichlorophenol 933788 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,6-Trichlorophenol 933755 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 mg l-¹ N <0.00023,4,5-Trichlorophenol 609198 mg l-¹ N <0.0002
All tests undertaken between 25/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 3 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ87166 to AJ87978
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 24 February 2014
TA7329- Burton UTC GIFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
252054AJ87166 AJ87167 AJ87169 AJ87170 AJ87172
BH01 BH01 WS02 WS02 BH01
004 008 002 005 002
21/2/2014 21/2/2014 20/2/2014 20/2/2014 21/2/2014
1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 10.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2010 pH M 8.7 9.6 8.2 8.1 7.62300 Cyanide (free) 57125 mg kg-¹ M <0.50
Cyanide (total) 57125 mg kg-¹ M <0.50Thiocyanate 302045 mg kg-¹ M <5.0
2175 Sulfur (total TRL report 447) % M 0.11 36 0.052 0.023 0.142120 Boron (hot water soluble) 7440428 mg kg-¹ M 4.4 0.6 1.4 0.9 4.5
Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M 0.28 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.362430 Iron 7439896 mg kg-¹ N 16000 5100 15000 14000 170002450 Arsenic 7440382 mg kg-¹ M 18 <2.0 7.4 13 23
Barium 7440393 mg kg-¹ M 240 33 180 180 320Beryllium 7440417 mg kg-¹ M 2.0 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 3.0Cadmium 7440439 mg kg-¹ M 0.31 <0.10 0.14 0.23 0.45Chromium 7440473 mg kg-¹ M 8.9 <5.0 8.5 8.0 8.7Copper 7440508 mg kg-¹ M 79 9.2 62 57 96Mercury 7439976 mg kg-¹ M 0.69 <0.10 0.17 0.14 0.86Nickel 7440020 mg kg-¹ M 22 <5.0 11 9.0 27Lead 7439921 mg kg-¹ M 270 11 84 58 310Selenium 7782492 mg kg-¹ M 0.54 <0.20 <0.20 0.21 0.73Vanadium 7440622 mg kg-¹ M 16 <5.0 19 17 19Zinc 7440666 mg kg-¹ M 240 14 46 34 270
2675 TPH aliphatic >C5-C6 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C6-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ M < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 25/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 4 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ87166 to AJ87978
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 24 February 2014
TA7329- Burton UTC GIFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
252054AJ87166 AJ87167 AJ87169 AJ87170 AJ87172
BH01 BH01 WS02 WS02 BH01
004 008 002 005 002
21/2/2014 21/2/2014 20/2/2014 20/2/2014 21/2/2014
1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 10.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2675 TPH aliphatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1TPH aliphatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1TPH aliphatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ M < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1TPH aliphatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1TPH aromatic >C5-C7 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C7-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ N < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1TPH aromatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M 1.0 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1TPH aromatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M 6.2 < 1 < 1 < 1 7.9TPH aromatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ N 21 < 1 < 1 < 1 17TPH aromatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N 1.3 < 1 < 1 < 1 1.1Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons mg kg-¹ N 29 < 10 < 10 < 10 27
2760 Methyl tert-butylether low level 1634044 µg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1Dichlorodifluoromethane 75718 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Chloromethane 74873 µg kg-¹ < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Vinyl chloride 75014 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Bromomethane 74839 µg kg-¹ M < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0 < 2.0Chloroethane 75003 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20Trichlorofluoromethane 75694 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloroethene 75354 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Dichloromethane 75092 µg kg-¹ N ne ne ne ne netrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156605 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloroethane 75343 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156592 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
All tests undertaken between 25/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 5 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ87166 to AJ87978
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 24 February 2014
TA7329- Burton UTC GIFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
252054AJ87166 AJ87167 AJ87169 AJ87170 AJ87172
BH01 BH01 WS02 WS02 BH01
004 008 002 005 002
21/2/2014 21/2/2014 20/2/2014 20/2/2014 21/2/2014
1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 10.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2760 Bromochloromethane 74975 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Trichloromethane 67663 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1,1-Trichloroethane 71556 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Tetrachloromethane 56235 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloropropene 563586 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Benzene 71432 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichloroethane 107062 µg kg-¹ M < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20Trichloroethene 79016 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichloropropane 78875 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Dibromomethane 74953 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Bromodichloromethane 75274 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061015 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Toluene 108883 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061026 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.01,1,2-Trichloroethane 79005 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Tetrachloroethene 127184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,3-Dichloropropane 142289 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20Dibromochloromethane 124481 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.01,2-Dibromoethane 106934 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50Chlorobenzene 108907 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630206 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20Ethylbenzene 100414 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10m- & p-Xylene 1330207 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10o-Xylene 95476 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Styrene 100425 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
All tests undertaken between 25/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 6 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ87166 to AJ87978
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 24 February 2014
TA7329- Burton UTC GIFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
252054AJ87166 AJ87167 AJ87169 AJ87170 AJ87172
BH01 BH01 WS02 WS02 BH01
004 008 002 005 002
21/2/2014 21/2/2014 20/2/2014 20/2/2014 21/2/2014
1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 10.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2760 Tribromomethane 75252 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0Isopropylbenzene 98828 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Bromobenzene 108861 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2,3-Trichloropropane 96184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50n-Propylbenzene 103651 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.102-Chlorotoluene 95498 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95636 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.104-Chlorotoluene 106434 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10tert-Butylbenzene 98066 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108678 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10sec-Butylbenzene 135988 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.104-Isopropyltoluene 99876 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10n-Butylbenzene 104518 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96128 µg kg-¹ N < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.01,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.10
2790 Phenol 108952 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 111444 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Chlorophenol 95578 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
All tests undertaken between 25/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 7 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ87166 to AJ87978
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 24 February 2014
TA7329- Burton UTC GIFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
252054AJ87166 AJ87167 AJ87169 AJ87170 AJ87172
BH01 BH01 WS02 WS02 BH01
004 008 002 005 002
21/2/2014 21/2/2014 20/2/2014 20/2/2014 21/2/2014
1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 10.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2790 2-Methylphenol 95487 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 108601 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Methylphenol 106445 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 621647 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachloroethane 67721 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Nitrobenzene 98953 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Isophorone 78591 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Nitrophenol 88755 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 111911 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dichlorophenol 120832 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Chloroaniline 106478 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59507 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Methylnaphthalene 91576 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77474 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Chloronaphthalene 91587 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Nitroaniline 88744 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Dimethylphthalate 131113 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,6-Dinitrotoluene 606202 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
All tests undertaken between 25/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 8 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ87166 to AJ87978
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 24 February 2014
TA7329- Burton UTC GIFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
252054AJ87166 AJ87167 AJ87169 AJ87170 AJ87172
BH01 BH01 WS02 WS02 BH01
004 008 002 005 002
21/2/2014 21/2/2014 20/2/2014 20/2/2014 21/2/2014
1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 10.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2790 3-Nitroaniline 99092 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Dibenzofuran 132649 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dinitrotoluene 121142 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Diethylphthalate 84662 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Chlorophenylphenylether 7005723 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Nitroaniline 100016 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 534521 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Azobenzene 103333 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Bromophenylphenylether 101553 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachlorobenzene 118741 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Pentachlorophenol 87865 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ N 1.9Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ N 0.36Carbazole 86748 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Di-n-butylphthalate 84742 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ N 3.9Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ N 3.4Butylbenzylphthalate 85687 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 117817 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Di-n-octylphthalate 117840 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
All tests undertaken between 25/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 9 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ87166 to AJ87978
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 24 February 2014
TA7329- Burton UTC GIFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
252054AJ87166 AJ87167 AJ87169 AJ87170 AJ87172
BH01 BH01 WS02 WS02 BH01
004 008 002 005 002
21/2/2014 21/2/2014 20/2/2014 20/2/2014 21/2/2014
1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 10.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2790 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Nitrophenol 100027 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
2792 Tentatively Identified Compounds mg kg-¹ not detected2800 Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ M 0.28 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.21
Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ N 0.89 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.56Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ M 0.15 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.1Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ M 0.51 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.25Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ M 4.9 0.14 0.13 <0.10 3.1Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ M 1.3 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.97Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ M 8.5 0.17 0.2 0.12 6.4Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ M 7.2 0.14 0.18 0.1 5.7Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ M 4.5 <0.10 0.17 <0.10 3.8Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ M 4.1 <0.10 0.12 <0.10 3.4Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ N 5.2 <0.10 0.28 <0.10 4.3Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ N 2 <0.10 0.11 <0.10 2Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ M 4.1 <0.10 0.18 <0.10 3Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ N 0.6 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.63Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ M 2.3 <0.10 0.11 <0.10 1.6Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ M 2.3 <0.10 0.14 <0.10 1.9Total (of 16) PAHs mg kg-¹ N 49 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 38
All tests undertaken between 25/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 10 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ87166 to AJ87978
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 10 samples
received 24 February 2014
TA7329- Burton UTC GIFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
06 March 2014
252054AJ87166 AJ87167 AJ87169 AJ87170 AJ87172
BH01 BH01 WS02 WS02 BH01
004 008 002 005 002
21/2/2014 21/2/2014 20/2/2014 20/2/2014 21/2/2014
1.00m 2.00m 0.50m 10.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL
2920 Phenols (total) mg kg-¹ M <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3
All tests undertaken between 25/02/2014 and 06/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 11 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ87166 to AJ87978
FAO Ian Swain
06 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear Ian Swain
Test Report Number 252054
Your Project Reference TA7329- Burton UTC GI
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 24 February 2014.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Phil Hellier, Director
2183
Notes to accompany report:
• The in-house procedure is employed to identify materials and fibres in soils
• The sample is examined by stereo-binocular and polarised light microscopy
• Sample size is reduced by coning and quartering to obtain a representative sub-sample if necessary
• The bulk identification is in accordance with the requirements of the analyst guide (HSG 248)
• Samples associated with asbestos are retained for six months
• The results relate only to the items tested as supplied by the client
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet252054
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Report Date
06 March 2014
Results of analysis of 5 samples
received 24 February 2014
TA7329- Burton UTC GIFAO Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Asbestos in Soils
Login Batch No:
Chemtest ID Sample ID Sample Desc
SOP 2192
ACM Type Asbestos Identification
AJ87166 BH01 004 1.00 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ87167 BH01 008 2.00 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ87169 WS02 002 0.50 Free Fibres ChrysotileAJ87170 WS02 005 10.00 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ87172 BH01 002 0.50 - No Asbestos Detected
Depth (m)
252054
Qualitative Results
The detection limit for this method is 0.001%
Lauren Quinn
Asbestos Analyst
Signed
All tests undertaken between 06-Mar-2014 and 6-Mar-2014 at our asbestos testing facility in
Coventry
Report page 1 of 1
LIMS sample ID range AJ87166 to AJ87172
FAO Ian Swain
19 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear Ian Swain
Test Report Number 252260
Your Project Reference TA7329 Burton UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 26 February 2014.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Darrell Hall, Director
Notes to accompany report:
• The sign < means 'less than'
• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
• n/e means 'not evaluated'
• i/s means 'insufficient sample'
• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
• The results relate only to the items tested
• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet252260
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples
received 26 February 2014
TA7329 Burton UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
18 March 2014
252260AJ93150 AJ93151
BH03 BH03
009 003
24/2/2014 24/2/2014
2.00m 0.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE
1010 pH PH U 8.0 7.81300 Cyanide (total) 57125 mg l-¹ U <0.050
Cyanide (free) 57125 mg l-¹ U <0.050Thiocyanate 302045 mg l-¹ U <0.50
1470 Iron (dissolved) 7439896 µg l-¹ N 501180 Sulfur 7704349 mg l-¹ N 161220 Chloride 16887006 mg l-¹ U 1.5
Ammoniacal Nitrogen AMM_NITROG mg l-¹ U 0.091325 Sulfide 18496258 mg l-¹ U <0.0501415 Calcium 7440702 mg l-¹ U 170
Magnesium 7439954 mg l-¹ U 601220 Sulfate 14808798 mg l-¹ U <1 471450 Arsenic 7440382 µg l-¹ U 2.2 5.2
Boron 7440428 µg l-¹ U 330Barium 7440393 µg l-¹ U 40Beryllium 7440417 µg l-¹ U <1.0Cadmium 7440439 µg l-¹ U <0.080 <0.080Chromium 7440473 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0Copper 7440508 µg l-¹ U 2.4 12Mercury 7439976 µg l-¹ U <0.50 <0.50Manganese 7439965 µg l-¹ U 38Nickel 7440020 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0Lead 7439921 µg l-¹ U 2.0 5.0Selenium 7782492 µg l-¹ U <1.0 2.3
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 27/02/2014 and 17/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 1 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ88239 to AJ93151
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples
received 26 February 2014
TA7329 Burton UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
18 March 2014
252260AJ93150 AJ93151
BH03 BH03
009 003
24/2/2014 24/2/2014
2.00m 0.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE
1450 Vanadium 7440622 µg l-¹ U 3.7Zinc 7440666 µg l-¹ U <1.0 5.8
1700 Naphthalene 91203 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthylene 208968 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthene 83329 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Fluorene 86737 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Phenanthrene 85018 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Anthracene 120127 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Fluoranthene 206440 µg l-¹ N 1.6 <0.01Pyrene 129000 µg l-¹ N 1.7 <0.01Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Chrysene 218019 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Total (of 16) PAHs µg l-¹ N 3.3 <0.2
1760 Benzene 71432 µg l-¹ U < 1.0Toluene 108883 µg l-¹ U < 1.0Ethylbenzene 100414 µg l-¹ U < 1.0m- & p-Xylene 1330207 µg l-¹ U < 1.0o-Xylene 95476 µg l-¹ U < 1.0
1900 2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 88857 mg l-¹ N <0.0002
All tests undertaken between 27/02/2014 and 17/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 2 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ88239 to AJ93151
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples
received 26 February 2014
TA7329 Burton UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
18 March 2014
252260AJ93150 AJ93151
BH03 BH03
009 003
24/2/2014 24/2/2014
2.00m 0.50m
LEACHATE LEACHATE
1900 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59507 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Chlorophenol 95578 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4-Dichlorophenol 120832 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,6-Dichlorophenol 87650 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 534521 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Methylphenol 95487 mg l-¹ N <0.00023-Methylphenol 108394 mg l-¹ N <0.00024-Methylphenol 106445 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Nitrophenol 88755 mg l-¹ N <0.00024-Nitrophenol 100027 mg l-¹ N <0.0002Pentachlorophenol 87865 mg l-¹ N <0.0002Phenol 108952 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 4901513 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58902 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 935955 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,4-Trichlorophenol 15950660 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,5-Trichlorophenol 933788 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,6-Trichlorophenol 933755 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 mg l-¹ N <0.00023,4,5-Trichlorophenol 609198 mg l-¹ N <0.0002
All tests undertaken between 27/02/2014 and 17/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 3 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ88239 to AJ93151
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 26 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
18 March 2014
252260AJ88240 AJ88243
BH03 BH03
009 003
24/2/2014 24/2/2014
2.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL
2010 pH M 8.9 8.02300 Cyanide (free) 57125 mg kg-¹ M <0.50
Cyanide (total) 57125 mg kg-¹ M <0.50Thiocyanate 302045 mg kg-¹ M <5.0
2175 Sulfur (total TRL report 447) % M 0.39 0.162120 Boron (hot water soluble) 7440428 mg kg-¹ M <0.4 6.9
Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M <0.01 0.332430 Iron 7439896 mg kg-¹ N 3700 130002450 Arsenic 7440382 mg kg-¹ M <2.0 13
Barium 7440393 mg kg-¹ M 18 240Beryllium 7440417 mg kg-¹ M <1.00 <1.00Cadmium 7440439 mg kg-¹ M 0.32 0.38Chromium 7440473 mg kg-¹ M <5.0 17Copper 7440508 mg kg-¹ M 5.3 62Mercury 7439976 mg kg-¹ M <0.10 0.18Nickel 7440020 mg kg-¹ M <5.0 14Lead 7439921 mg kg-¹ M 17 170Selenium 7782492 mg kg-¹ M <0.20 0.27Vanadium 7440622 mg kg-¹ M <5.0 21Zinc 7440666 mg kg-¹ M 16 250
2675 TPH aliphatic >C5-C6 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C6-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N 6.5 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ M 58 < 1
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 27/02/2014 and 17/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 4 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ88239 to AJ93151
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 26 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
18 March 2014
252260AJ88240 AJ88243
BH03 BH03
009 003
24/2/2014 24/2/2014
2.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL
2675 TPH aliphatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M 490 < 1TPH aliphatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M 430 < 1TPH aliphatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ M 550 < 1TPH aliphatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N 92 < 1TPH aromatic >C5-C7 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C7-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ N 26 < 1TPH aromatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M 99 5.6TPH aromatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M 260 8.6TPH aromatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ N 680 25TPH aromatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N 56 < 1Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons mg kg-¹ N 2700 40
2760 Methyl tert-butylether low level 1634044 µg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1Dichlorodifluoromethane 75718 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Chloromethane 74873 µg kg-¹ < 0.10 < 0.10Vinyl chloride 75014 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Bromomethane 74839 µg kg-¹ M < 2.0 < 2.0Chloroethane 75003 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20Trichlorofluoromethane 75694 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloroethene 75354 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Dichloromethane 75092 µg kg-¹ N ne netrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156605 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloroethane 75343 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156592 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10
All tests undertaken between 27/02/2014 and 17/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 5 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ88239 to AJ93151
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 26 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
18 March 2014
252260AJ88240 AJ88243
BH03 BH03
009 003
24/2/2014 24/2/2014
2.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL
2760 Bromochloromethane 74975 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Trichloromethane 67663 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,1,1-Trichloroethane 71556 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Tetrachloromethane 56235 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloropropene 563586 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Benzene 71432 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichloroethane 107062 µg kg-¹ M < 0.20 < 0.20Trichloroethene 79016 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichloropropane 78875 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Dibromomethane 74953 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 < 1.0Bromodichloromethane 75274 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 < 0.50cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061015 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0Toluene 108883 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061026 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.01,1,2-Trichloroethane 79005 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 < 1.0Tetrachloroethene 127184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,3-Dichloropropane 142289 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20Dibromochloromethane 124481 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.01,2-Dibromoethane 106934 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 < 0.50Chlorobenzene 108907 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630206 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20Ethylbenzene 100414 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10m- & p-Xylene 1330207 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10o-Xylene 95476 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Styrene 100425 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10
All tests undertaken between 27/02/2014 and 17/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 6 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ88239 to AJ93151
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 26 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
18 March 2014
252260AJ88240 AJ88243
BH03 BH03
009 003
24/2/2014 24/2/2014
2.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL
2760 Tribromomethane 75252 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0Isopropylbenzene 98828 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Bromobenzene 108861 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.101,2,3-Trichloropropane 96184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.50 < 0.50n-Propylbenzene 103651 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.102-Chlorotoluene 95498 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95636 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.104-Chlorotoluene 106434 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10tert-Butylbenzene 98066 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108678 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10sec-Butylbenzene 135988 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.104-Isopropyltoluene 99876 µg kg-¹ N 0.10 < 0.101,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10n-Butylbenzene 104518 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96128 µg kg-¹ N < 5.0 < 5.01,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10
2790 Phenol 108952 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 111444 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Chlorophenol 95578 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
All tests undertaken between 27/02/2014 and 17/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 7 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ88239 to AJ93151
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 26 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
18 March 2014
252260AJ88240 AJ88243
BH03 BH03
009 003
24/2/2014 24/2/2014
2.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL
2790 2-Methylphenol 95487 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 108601 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Methylphenol 106445 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 621647 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachloroethane 67721 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Nitrobenzene 98953 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Isophorone 78591 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Nitrophenol 88755 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 111911 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dichlorophenol 120832 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Chloroaniline 106478 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59507 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Methylnaphthalene 91576 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77474 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Chloronaphthalene 91587 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Nitroaniline 88744 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Dimethylphthalate 131113 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,6-Dinitrotoluene 606202 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
All tests undertaken between 27/02/2014 and 17/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 8 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ88239 to AJ93151
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 26 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
18 March 2014
252260AJ88240 AJ88243
BH03 BH03
009 003
24/2/2014 24/2/2014
2.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL
2790 3-Nitroaniline 99092 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Dibenzofuran 132649 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dinitrotoluene 121142 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Diethylphthalate 84662 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Chlorophenylphenylether 7005723 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Nitroaniline 100016 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 534521 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Azobenzene 103333 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Bromophenylphenylether 101553 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachlorobenzene 118741 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Pentachlorophenol 87865 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Carbazole 86748 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Di-n-butylphthalate 84742 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Butylbenzylphthalate 85687 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 117817 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Di-n-octylphthalate 117840 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
All tests undertaken between 27/02/2014 and 17/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 9 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ88239 to AJ93151
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 26 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
18 March 2014
252260AJ88240 AJ88243
BH03 BH03
009 003
24/2/2014 24/2/2014
2.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL
2790 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Nitrophenol 100027 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
2792 Tentatively Identified Compounds mg kg-¹ not detected2800 Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ M 0.35 0.5
Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ N 0.76 0.3Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ M 2.8 0.46Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ M 1.7 0.27Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ M 14 1.7Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ M 5 0.6Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ M 34 4Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ M 35 3.6Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ M 13 2Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ M 12 1.9Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ N 28 3.8Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ N 23 3.1Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ M 18 2Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ N 1.8 0.35Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ M 9.3 1.3Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ M 11 1.4Total (of 16) PAHs mg kg-¹ N 210 27
All tests undertaken between 27/02/2014 and 17/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 10 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ88239 to AJ93151
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 26 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
18 March 2014
252260AJ88240 AJ88243
BH03 BH03
009 003
24/2/2014 24/2/2014
2.00m 0.50m
SOIL SOIL
2815 PCB 101 37680732 mg kg-¹ M < 0.01PCB 118 31508006 mg kg-¹ M < 0.01PCB 138 35065282 mg kg-¹ M < 0.01PCB 153 35065271 mg kg-¹ M < 0.01PCB 180 35065293 mg kg-¹ M < 0.01PCB 28 7012375 mg kg-¹ M < 0.01PCB 52 35693993 mg kg-¹ M < 0.01
2920 Phenols (total) mg kg-¹ M 1 <0.3
All tests undertaken between 27/02/2014 and 17/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 11 of 11
LIMS sample ID range AJ88239 to AJ93151
FAO Ian Swain
19 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear Ian Swain
Test Report Number 252260
Your Project Reference TA7329 Burton UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 26 February 2014.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Darrell Hall, Director
2183
Notes to accompany report:
• The in-house procedure is employed to identify materials and fibres in soils
• The sample is examined by stereo-binocular and polarised light microscopy
• Sample size is reduced by coning and quartering to obtain a representative sub-sample if necessary
• The bulk identification is in accordance with the requirements of the analyst guide (HSG 248)
• Samples associated with asbestos are retained for six months
• The results relate only to the items tested as supplied by the client
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet252260
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Report Date
19 March 2014
Results of analysis of 2 samples
received 26 February 2014
TA7329 Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Asbestos in Soils
Login Batch No:
Chemtest ID Sample ID Sample Desc
SOP 2192
ACM Type Asbestos Identification
AJ88240 BH03 009 2.00 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ88243 BH03 003 0.50 - No Asbestos Detected
Depth (m)
252260
Qualitative Results
The detection limit for this method is 0.001%
Steve McGrath
Asbestos Analyst
Signed
All tests undertaken between 19-Mar-2014 and 19-Mar-2014 at our asbestos testing facility in
Coventry
Report page 1 of 1
LIMS sample ID range AJ88240 to AJ88243
FAO Ian Swain
12 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear Ian Swain
Test Report Number 252353
Your Project Reference TA7329 - Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 4 March 2014.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Darrell Hall, Director
Notes to accompany report:
• The sign < means 'less than'
• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
• n/e means 'not evaluated'
• i/s means 'insufficient sample'
• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
• The results relate only to the items tested
• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet252353
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples
received 4 March 2014
TA7329 - Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
12 March 2014
252353AJ90994 AJ90995
BH05 BH05
002 005
26/2/2014 26/2/2014
0.25m 1.00m
LEACHATE LEACHATE
1010 pH PH U 7.9 8.01220 Sulfate 14808798 mg l-¹ U 7.9 <11450 Arsenic 7440382 µg l-¹ U 6.8 1.5
Cadmium 7440439 µg l-¹ U <0.080 <0.080Chromium 7440473 µg l-¹ U 5.5 10Copper 7440508 µg l-¹ U 2.1 4.0Mercury 7439976 µg l-¹ U <0.50 <0.50Nickel 7440020 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0Lead 7439921 µg l-¹ U 14 10Selenium 7782492 µg l-¹ U 1.2 <1.0Zinc 7440666 µg l-¹ U <1.0 7.8
1700 Naphthalene 91203 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthylene 208968 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthene 83329 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Fluorene 86737 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Phenanthrene 85018 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Anthracene 120127 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Fluoranthene 206440 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Pyrene 129000 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Chrysene 218019 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 28/02/2014 and 12/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 1 of 9
LIMS sample ID range AJ88736 to AJ90995
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples
received 4 March 2014
TA7329 - Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
12 March 2014
252353AJ90994 AJ90995
BH05 BH05
002 005
26/2/2014 26/2/2014
0.25m 1.00m
LEACHATE LEACHATE
1700 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01Total (of 16) PAHs µg l-¹ N <0.2 <0.2
All tests undertaken between 28/02/2014 and 12/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 2 of 9
LIMS sample ID range AJ88736 to AJ90995
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 28 February 2014
TA7329 - Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
12 March 2014
252353AJ88737 AJ88739
BH05 BH05
002 005
26/2/2014 26/2/2014
0.25m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL
2010 pH M 8.9 8.42175 Sulfur (total TRL report 447) % M 0.095 <0.0102120 Boron (hot water soluble) 7440428 mg kg-¹ M 0.5 1.1
Sulfate (2:1 water soluble) as SO4 14808798 g l-¹ M <0.01 <0.012430 Iron 7439896 mg kg-¹ N 13000 130002450 Arsenic 7440382 mg kg-¹ M 17 4.0
Barium 7440393 mg kg-¹ M 670 59Beryllium 7440417 mg kg-¹ M 1.3 <1.00Cadmium 7440439 mg kg-¹ M <0.10 <0.10Chromium 7440473 mg kg-¹ M 20 13Copper 7440508 mg kg-¹ M 56 6.7Mercury 7439976 mg kg-¹ M 0.23 <0.10Nickel 7440020 mg kg-¹ M 28 8.3Lead 7439921 mg kg-¹ M 1300 44Selenium 7782492 mg kg-¹ M <0.20 <0.20Vanadium 7440622 mg kg-¹ M 27 16Zinc 7440666 mg kg-¹ M 300 26
2675 TPH aliphatic >C5-C6 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C6-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aliphatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ M < 1 < 1TPH aliphatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M < 1 < 1TPH aliphatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M < 1 < 1TPH aliphatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ M < 1 < 1
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 28/02/2014 and 12/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 3 of 9
LIMS sample ID range AJ88736 to AJ90995
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 28 February 2014
TA7329 - Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
12 March 2014
252353AJ88737 AJ88739
BH05 BH05
002 005
26/2/2014 26/2/2014
0.25m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL
2675 TPH aliphatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N < 1 < 1TPH aromatic >C5-C7 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C7-C8 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1TPH aromatic >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ N < 1 < 1TPH aromatic >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M 3.2 < 1TPH aromatic >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M 9.8 < 1TPH aromatic >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ N 44 < 1TPH aromatic >C35-C44 mg kg-¹ N < 1 < 1Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons mg kg-¹ N 58 < 10
2760 Methyl tert-butylether low level 1634044 µg kg-¹ N < 0.1 < 0.1Dichlorodifluoromethane 75718 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Chloromethane 74873 µg kg-¹ < 0.10 < 0.10Vinyl chloride 75014 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Bromomethane 74839 µg kg-¹ M < 2.0 < 2.0Chloroethane 75003 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20Trichlorofluoromethane 75694 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloroethene 75354 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Dichloromethane 75092 µg kg-¹ N ne netrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156605 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloroethane 75343 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156592 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Bromochloromethane 74975 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Trichloromethane 67663 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,1,1-Trichloroethane 71556 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10
All tests undertaken between 28/02/2014 and 12/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 4 of 9
LIMS sample ID range AJ88736 to AJ90995
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 28 February 2014
TA7329 - Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
12 March 2014
252353AJ88737 AJ88739
BH05 BH05
002 005
26/2/2014 26/2/2014
0.25m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL
2760 Tetrachloromethane 56235 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,1-Dichloropropene 563586 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10Benzene 71432 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichloroethane 107062 µg kg-¹ M < 0.20 < 0.20Trichloroethene 79016 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichloropropane 78875 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Dibromomethane 74953 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 < 1.0Bromodichloromethane 75274 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 < 0.50cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061015 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0Toluene 108883 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061026 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.01,1,2-Trichloroethane 79005 µg kg-¹ M < 1.0 < 1.0Tetrachloroethene 127184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,3-Dichloropropane 142289 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20Dibromochloromethane 124481 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.01,2-Dibromoethane 106934 µg kg-¹ M < 0.50 < 0.50Chlorobenzene 108907 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630206 µg kg-¹ N < 0.20 < 0.20Ethylbenzene 100414 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10m- & p-Xylene 1330207 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10o-Xylene 95476 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Styrene 100425 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Tribromomethane 75252 µg kg-¹ N < 1.0 < 1.0Isopropylbenzene 98828 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Bromobenzene 108861 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10
All tests undertaken between 28/02/2014 and 12/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 5 of 9
LIMS sample ID range AJ88736 to AJ90995
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 28 February 2014
TA7329 - Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
12 March 2014
252353AJ88737 AJ88739
BH05 BH05
002 005
26/2/2014 26/2/2014
0.25m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL
2760 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96184 µg kg-¹ N < 0.50 < 0.50n-Propylbenzene 103651 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.102-Chlorotoluene 95498 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95636 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.104-Chlorotoluene 106434 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10tert-Butylbenzene 98066 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108678 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10sec-Butylbenzene 135988 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.104-Isopropyltoluene 99876 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10n-Butylbenzene 104518 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.101,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96128 µg kg-¹ N < 5.0 < 5.01,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 µg kg-¹ M < 0.10 < 0.10Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 µg kg-¹ N < 0.10 < 0.10
2790 Phenol 108952 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 111444 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Chlorophenol 95578 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Methylphenol 95487 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 108601 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Methylphenol 106445 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
All tests undertaken between 28/02/2014 and 12/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 6 of 9
LIMS sample ID range AJ88736 to AJ90995
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 28 February 2014
TA7329 - Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
12 March 2014
252353AJ88737 AJ88739
BH05 BH05
002 005
26/2/2014 26/2/2014
0.25m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL
2790 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 621647 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachloroethane 67721 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Nitrobenzene 98953 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Isophorone 78591 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Nitrophenol 88755 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 111911 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dichlorophenol 120832 mg kg-¹ N < 0.051,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Chloroaniline 106478 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59507 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Methylnaphthalene 91576 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77474 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Chloronaphthalene 91587 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Nitroaniline 88744 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Dimethylphthalate 131113 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,6-Dinitrotoluene 606202 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ N < 0.053-Nitroaniline 99092 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Dibenzofuran 132649 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
All tests undertaken between 28/02/2014 and 12/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 7 of 9
LIMS sample ID range AJ88736 to AJ90995
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 28 February 2014
TA7329 - Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
12 March 2014
252353AJ88737 AJ88739
BH05 BH05
002 005
26/2/2014 26/2/2014
0.25m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL
2790 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121142 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Diethylphthalate 84662 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Chlorophenylphenylether 7005723 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Nitroaniline 100016 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 534521 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Azobenzene 103333 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Bromophenylphenylether 101553 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Hexachlorobenzene 118741 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Pentachlorophenol 87865 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Carbazole 86748 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Di-n-butylphthalate 84742 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Butylbenzylphthalate 85687 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 117817 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Di-n-octylphthalate 117840 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
All tests undertaken between 28/02/2014 and 12/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 8 of 9
LIMS sample ID range AJ88736 to AJ90995
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 28 February 2014
TA7329 - Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
12 March 2014
252353AJ88737 AJ88739
BH05 BH05
002 005
26/2/2014 26/2/2014
0.25m 1.00m
SOIL SOIL
2790 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ N < 0.052,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 mg kg-¹ N < 0.054-Nitrophenol 100027 mg kg-¹ N < 0.05
2792 Tentatively Identified Compounds mg kg-¹ not detected2800 Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ M <0.10 <0.10
Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ N 0.1 <0.10Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ M <0.10 <0.10Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ M <0.10 <0.10Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ M 0.39 <0.10Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ M 0.27 <0.10Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ M 2.3 <0.10Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ M 2.6 <0.10Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ M 1.1 <0.10Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ M 1 <0.10Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ N 1.6 <0.10Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ N 0.79 <0.10Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ M 1.3 <0.10Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ N 0.15 <0.10Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ M 0.75 <0.10Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ M 0.88 <0.10Total (of 16) PAHs mg kg-¹ N 13 <2.0
2920 Phenols (total) mg kg-¹ M <0.3 <0.3
All tests undertaken between 28/02/2014 and 12/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 9 of 9
LIMS sample ID range AJ88736 to AJ90995
FAO Ian Swain
14 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear Ian Swain
Test Report Number 252353
Your Project Reference TA7329 - Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 4 March 2014.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Darrell Hall, Director
2183
Notes to accompany report:
• The in-house procedure is employed to identify materials and fibres in soils
• The sample is examined by stereo-binocular and polarised light microscopy
• Sample size is reduced by coning and quartering to obtain a representative sub-sample if necessary
• The bulk identification is in accordance with the requirements of the analyst guide (HSG 248)
• Samples associated with asbestos are retained for six months
• The results relate only to the items tested as supplied by the client
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet252353
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
Report Date
14 March 2014
Results of analysis of 2 samples
received 28 February 2014
TA7329 - Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Asbestos in Soils
Login Batch No:
Chemtest ID Sample ID Sample Desc
SOP 2192
ACM Type Asbestos Identification
AJ88737 BH05 002 0.25 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ88739 BH05 005 1.00 - No Asbestos Detected
Depth (m)
252353
Qualitative Results
The detection limit for this method is 0.001%
Steve McGrath
Asbestos Analyst
Signed
All tests undertaken between 12-Mar-2014 and 12-Mar-2014 at our asbestos testing facility in
Coventry
Report page 1 of 1
LIMS sample ID range AJ88737 to AJ88739
FAO Ian Swain
20 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear Ian Swain
Test Report Number 252981
Your Project Reference TA7329 Burton & South Derbyshire UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 7 March 2014.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Keith Jones, Technical Manager
Notes to accompany report:
• The sign < means 'less than'
• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
• n/e means 'not evaluated'
• i/s means 'insufficient sample'
• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
• The results relate only to the items tested
• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet252981
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 7 March 2014
TA7329 Burton & South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
20 March 2014
252981AJ92410 AJ92412 AJ92413 AJ92414
BH02 BH04 BH05 WS01
MW01 MW01 MW01 MW01
5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014
2.60m 2.54m 2.49m 2.66m
WATER WATER WATER WATER
1010 pH PH U 7.6 7.7 7.81300 Cyanide (total) 57125 mg l-¹ U <0.050 <0.050
Cyanide (free) 57125 mg l-¹ U <0.050 <0.050Thiocyanate 302045 mg l-¹ U <0.50 <0.50
1470 Iron (dissolved) 7439896 µg l-¹ N <20 <201180 Sulfur 7704349 mg l-¹ N 600 371220 Chloride 16887006 mg l-¹ U 62 140
Ammoniacal Nitrogen AMM_NITROG mg l-¹ U 0.04 0.051325 Sulfide 18496258 mg l-¹ U <0.050 <0.0501610 Total Organic Carbon TOC mg l-¹ N 14 111415 Calcium 7440702 mg l-¹ U 710 110
Magnesium 7439954 mg l-¹ U 96 241220 Sulfate 14808798 mg l-¹ U 1800 110 471450 Arsenic 7440382 µg l-¹ U 2.7 1.2 <1.0
Boron 7440428 µg l-¹ U 1100 1200Barium 7440393 µg l-¹ U 38 170Beryllium 7440417 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0Cadmium 7440439 µg l-¹ U <0.080 <0.080 0.18Chromium 7440473 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Copper 7440508 µg l-¹ U 1.2 2.0 1.8Mercury 7439976 µg l-¹ U <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Manganese 7439965 µg l-¹ U 500 140Nickel 7440020 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Lead 7439921 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 10/03/2014 and 18/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 1 of 8
LIMS sample ID range AJ92410 to AJ92414
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 7 March 2014
TA7329 Burton & South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
20 March 2014
252981AJ92410 AJ92412 AJ92413 AJ92414
BH02 BH04 BH05 WS01
MW01 MW01 MW01 MW01
5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014
2.60m 2.54m 2.49m 2.66m
WATER WATER WATER WATER
1450 Selenium 7782492 µg l-¹ U 1.4 9.0 7.2Vanadium 7440622 µg l-¹ U <1.0 <1.0Zinc 7440666 µg l-¹ U 41 2.8 3.0
1700 Naphthalene 91203 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthylene 208968 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Acenaphthene 83329 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Fluorene 86737 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Phenanthrene 85018 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Anthracene 120127 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Fluoranthene 206440 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Pyrene 129000 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Chrysene 218019 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 µg l-¹ N <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Total (of 16) PAHs µg l-¹ N <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
1760 Methyl tert-butylether 1634044 µg l-¹ N <1 <1Dichlorodifluoromethane 75718 µg l-¹ U <1 <1Chloromethane 74873 µg l-¹ U <1 <1Vinyl chloride 75014 µg l-¹ U <1 <1Bromomethane 74839 µg l-¹ U <20 <20
All tests undertaken between 10/03/2014 and 18/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 2 of 8
LIMS sample ID range AJ92410 to AJ92414
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 7 March 2014
TA7329 Burton & South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
20 March 2014
252981AJ92410 AJ92412 AJ92413 AJ92414
BH02 BH04 BH05 WS01
MW01 MW01 MW01 MW01
5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014
2.60m 2.54m 2.49m 2.66m
WATER WATER WATER WATER
1760 Chloroethane 75003 µg l-¹ U <2 <2Trichlorofluoromethane 75694 µg l-¹ U <1 <11,1-Dichloroethene 75354 µg l-¹ U <1 <1Dichloromethane 75092 µg l-¹ N ne netrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156605 µg l-¹ U <1 <11,1-Dichloroethane 75343 µg l-¹ U <1 <1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156592 µg l-¹ U <1 <1Bromochloromethane 74975 µg l-¹ U <1 <1Trichloromethane 67663 µg l-¹ U 3.1 9.61,1,1-Trichloroethane 71556 µg l-¹ U <1 <1Tetrachloromethane 56235 µg l-¹ U <1 <11,1-Dichloropropene 563586 µg l-¹ U <1 <1Benzene 71432 µg l-¹ U <1 <1 <11,2-Dichloroethane 107062 µg l-¹ U <2 <2Trichloroethene 79016 µg l-¹ N <1 <11,2-Dichloropropane 78875 µg l-¹ U <1 <1Dibromomethane 74953 µg l-¹ U <10 <10Bromodichloromethane 75274 µg l-¹ U <5 <5cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061015 µg l-¹ U <10 <10Toluene 108883 µg l-¹ U <1 <1 <1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061026 µg l-¹ U <10 <101,1,2-Trichloroethane 79005 µg l-¹ U <10 <10Tetrachloroethene 127184 µg l-¹ U <1 <11,3-Dichloropropane 142289 µg l-¹ U <2 <2Dibromochloromethane 124481 µg l-¹ U <10 <10
All tests undertaken between 10/03/2014 and 18/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 3 of 8
LIMS sample ID range AJ92410 to AJ92414
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 7 March 2014
TA7329 Burton & South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
20 March 2014
252981AJ92410 AJ92412 AJ92413 AJ92414
BH02 BH04 BH05 WS01
MW01 MW01 MW01 MW01
5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014
2.60m 2.54m 2.49m 2.66m
WATER WATER WATER WATER
1760 1,2-Dibromoethane 106934 µg l-¹ U <5 <5Chlorobenzene 108907 µg l-¹ U <1 <11,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630206 µg l-¹ U <2 <2Ethylbenzene 100414 µg l-¹ U <1 <1 <1m- & p-Xylene 1330207 µg l-¹ U <1 <1 <1o-Xylene 95476 µg l-¹ U <1 <1 <1Styrene 100425 µg l-¹ U <1 <1Tribromomethane 75252 µg l-¹ U <10 <10Isopropylbenzene 98828 µg l-¹ U <1 <1Bromobenzene 108861 µg l-¹ U <1 <11,2,3-Trichloropropane 96184 µg l-¹ U <50 <50n-Propylbenzene 103651 µg l-¹ U <1 <12-Chlorotoluene 95498 µg l-¹ U <1 <11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95636 µg l-¹ U <1 <14-Chlorotoluene 106434 µg l-¹ U <1 <1tert-Butylbenzene 98066 µg l-¹ U <1 <11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108678 µg l-¹ U <1 <1sec-Butylbenzene 135988 µg l-¹ U <1 <11,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731 µg l-¹ U <1 <14-Isopropyltoluene 99876 µg l-¹ U <1 <11,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 µg l-¹ U <1 <1n-Butylbenzene 104518 µg l-¹ U <1 <11,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501 µg l-¹ U <1 <11,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96128 µg l-¹ U <50 <501,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 µg l-¹ U <1 <1
All tests undertaken between 10/03/2014 and 18/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 4 of 8
LIMS sample ID range AJ92410 to AJ92414
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 7 March 2014
TA7329 Burton & South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
20 March 2014
252981AJ92410 AJ92412 AJ92413 AJ92414
BH02 BH04 BH05 WS01
MW01 MW01 MW01 MW01
5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014
2.60m 2.54m 2.49m 2.66m
WATER WATER WATER WATER
1760 Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 µg l-¹ U <1 <11790 Acenaphthene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05
Acenaphthylene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Anthracene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Azobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Benzo[a]anthracene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Benzo[a]pyrene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Benzo[b]fluoranthene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Benzo[g,h,i]perylene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Benzo[k]fluoranthene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Butylbenzylphthalate µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Carbazole µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Chrysene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Di-n-butylphthalate µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Di-n-octylphthalate µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Dibenzofuran µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Diethylphthalate µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Dimethylphthalate µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Fluoranthene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Fluorene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05
All tests undertaken between 10/03/2014 and 18/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 5 of 8
LIMS sample ID range AJ92410 to AJ92414
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 7 March 2014
TA7329 Burton & South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
20 March 2014
252981AJ92410 AJ92412 AJ92413 AJ92414
BH02 BH04 BH05 WS01
MW01 MW01 MW01 MW01
5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014
2.60m 2.54m 2.49m 2.66m
WATER WATER WATER WATER
1790 Hexachlorobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Hexachlorobutadiene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Hexachlorocyclopentadiene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Hexachloroethane µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Isophorone µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Naphthalene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Nitrobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Pentachlorophenol µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Phenanthrene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Phenol µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05Pyrene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.051,2-Dichlorobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.051,2,4-Trichlorobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.051,4-Dichlorobenzene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.052-Chloronaphthalene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.052-Chlorophenol µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.052-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.052-Methylnaphthalene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.052-Methylphenol µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.052-Nitroaniline µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.052-Nitrophenol µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.052,4-Dichlorophenol µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05
All tests undertaken between 10/03/2014 and 18/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 6 of 8
LIMS sample ID range AJ92410 to AJ92414
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 7 March 2014
TA7329 Burton & South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
20 March 2014
252981AJ92410 AJ92412 AJ92413 AJ92414
BH02 BH04 BH05 WS01
MW01 MW01 MW01 MW01
5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014
2.60m 2.54m 2.49m 2.66m
WATER WATER WATER WATER
1790 2,4-Dimethylphenol µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.052,4-Dinitrotoluene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.052,4,5-Trichlorophenol µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.052,4,6-Trichlorophenol µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.052,6-Dinitrotoluene µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.053-Nitroaniline µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.054-Bromophenylphenylether µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.054-Chloro-3-methylphenol µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.054-Chloroaniline µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.054-Chlorophenylphenylether µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.054-Methylphenol µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.054-Nitroaniline µg l-¹ N <0.05 <0.05
1792 Tentatively Identified Compounds ug l-¹ not detected not detected1815 PCB 101 37680732 µg l-¹ N <0.010 <0.010
PCB 118 31508006 µg l-¹ N <0.010 <0.010PCB 138 35065282 µg l-¹ N <0.010 <0.010PCB 153 35065271 µg l-¹ N <0.010 <0.010PCB 180 35065293 µg l-¹ N <0.010 <0.010PCB 28 7012375 µg l-¹ N <0.010 <0.010PCB 52 35693993 µg l-¹ N <0.010 <0.010
1900 2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 88857 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00024-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59507 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022-Chlorophenol 95578 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,4-Dichlorophenol 120832 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,6-Dichlorophenol 87650 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.0002
All tests undertaken between 10/03/2014 and 18/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 7 of 8
LIMS sample ID range AJ92410 to AJ92414
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 4 samples
received 7 March 2014
TA7329 Burton & South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
20 March 2014
252981AJ92410 AJ92412 AJ92413 AJ92414
BH02 BH04 BH05 WS01
MW01 MW01 MW01 MW01
5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014 5/3/2014
2.60m 2.54m 2.49m 2.66m
WATER WATER WATER WATER
1900 2,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 534521 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022-Methylphenol 95487 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00023-Methylphenol 108394 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00024-Methylphenol 106445 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022-Nitrophenol 88755 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00024-Nitrophenol 100027 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.0002Pentachlorophenol 87865 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.0002Phenol 108952 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 4901513 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58902 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 935955 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,3,4-Trichlorophenol 15950660 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,3,5-Trichlorophenol 933788 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,3,6-Trichlorophenol 933755 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00022,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.00023,4,5-Trichlorophenol 609198 mg l-¹ N <0.0002 <0.0002
All tests undertaken between 10/03/2014 and 18/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 8 of 8
LIMS sample ID range AJ92410 to AJ92414
FAO Ian Swain
25 March 2014
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Leeds
LS11 5SX
Depot Road
Newmarket
CB8 0AL
Tel: 01638 606070
Dear Ian Swain
Test Report Number 253440
Your Project Reference TA7329- Burton and South Derbyshire UTC
Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 14 March 2014.
All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for
7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then
please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be
aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.
If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services
team.
Yours sincerely
Keith Jones, Technical Manager
Notes to accompany report:
• The sign < means 'less than'
• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation
• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation
• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory
• n/e means 'not evaluated'
• i/s means 'insufficient sample'
• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'
• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation
• The results relate only to the items tested
• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis
• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently
corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols
• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis
• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request
• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected
2183
Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL
Test Report Cover Sheet253440
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 1 sample
received 14 March 2014
TA7329- Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
25 March 2014
253440AJ95034
MW01
001
11/3/2014
2.65m
WATER
1010 pH PH U 8.21300 Cyanide (total) 57125 mg l-¹ U <0.05
Cyanide (free) 57125 mg l-¹ U <0.05Thiocyanate 302045 mg l-¹ U <0.5
1470 Iron (dissolved) 7439896 µg l-¹ N <201180 Sulfur 7704349 mg l-¹ N 5701220 Chloride 16887006 mg l-¹ U 75
Ammoniacal Nitrogen AMM_NITROG mg l-¹ U < 0.011325 Sulfide 18496258 mg l-¹ U <0.0501415 Calcium 7440702 mg l-¹ U 600
Magnesium 7439954 mg l-¹ U 1201220 Sulfate 14808798 mg l-¹ U 17001450 Arsenic 7440382 µg l-¹ U 3.6
Boron 7440428 µg l-¹ U 500Barium 7440393 µg l-¹ U 41Beryllium 7440417 µg l-¹ U <1.0Cadmium 7440439 µg l-¹ U 0.092Chromium 7440473 µg l-¹ U <1.0Copper 7440508 µg l-¹ U 1.2Mercury 7439976 µg l-¹ U <0.50Manganese 7439965 µg l-¹ U 100Nickel 7440020 µg l-¹ U <1.0Lead 7439921 µg l-¹ U <1.0Selenium 7782492 µg l-¹ U 4.6
*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi
Matrix
Depth
Sample No
Sample ID
Chemtest LIMS ID
Login Batch No
Sampling Date
All tests undertaken between 14/03/2014 and 25/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 1 of 3
LIMS sample ID range AJ95034 to AJ95034
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 1 sample
received 14 March 2014
TA7329- Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
25 March 2014
253440AJ95034
MW01
001
11/3/2014
2.65m
WATER
1450 Vanadium 7440622 µg l-¹ U <1.0Zinc 7440666 µg l-¹ U 36
1700 Naphthalene 91203 µg l-¹ N <0.01Acenaphthylene 208968 µg l-¹ N <0.01Acenaphthene 83329 µg l-¹ N <0.01Fluorene 86737 µg l-¹ N <0.01Phenanthrene 85018 µg l-¹ N <0.01Anthracene 120127 µg l-¹ N <0.01Fluoranthene 206440 µg l-¹ N <0.01Pyrene 129000 µg l-¹ N <0.01Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 µg l-¹ N <0.01Chrysene 218019 µg l-¹ N <0.01Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 µg l-¹ N <0.01Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 µg l-¹ N <0.01Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 µg l-¹ N <0.01Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 µg l-¹ N <0.01Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 µg l-¹ N <0.01Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 µg l-¹ N <0.01Total (of 16) PAHs µg l-¹ N <0.2
1760 Benzene 71432 µg l-¹ U 3.4Toluene 108883 µg l-¹ U 1.3Ethylbenzene 100414 µg l-¹ U <1.0m- & p-Xylene 1330207 µg l-¹ U <1.0o-Xylene 95476 µg l-¹ U <1.0
1900 2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 88857 mg l-¹ N <0.0002
All tests undertaken between 14/03/2014 and 25/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 2 of 3
LIMS sample ID range AJ95034 to AJ95034
LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 1 sample
received 14 March 2014
TA7329- Burton and South Derbyshire UTCFAO
Soil Engineering Geoservices Ltd
Ian Swain
Parkside Lane
Dewsbury Road
Leeds
LS11 5SX Report Date
25 March 2014
253440AJ95034
MW01
001
11/3/2014
2.65m
WATER
1900 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59507 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Chlorophenol 95578 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4-Dichlorophenol 120832 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,6-Dichlorophenol 87650 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 534521 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Methylphenol 95487 mg l-¹ N <0.00023-Methylphenol 108394 mg l-¹ N <0.00024-Methylphenol 106445 mg l-¹ N <0.00022-Nitrophenol 88755 mg l-¹ N <0.00024-Nitrophenol 100027 mg l-¹ N <0.0002Pentachlorophenol 87865 mg l-¹ N <0.0002Phenol 108952 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 4901513 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58902 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 935955 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,4-Trichlorophenol 15950660 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,5-Trichlorophenol 933788 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,3,6-Trichlorophenol 933755 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 mg l-¹ N <0.00022,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 mg l-¹ N <0.00023,4,5-Trichlorophenol 609198 mg l-¹ N <0.0002
All tests undertaken between 14/03/2014 and 25/03/2014
* Accreditation status
This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.
Column page 1
Report page 3 of 3
LIMS sample ID range AJ95034 to AJ95034
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION CPlans and Drawings
SITE LOCATION PLAN
section title sheets x25.indd 22 14/03/2013 16:17
Reproduced from Ordnance Survey's 1:50,000 map number 128 with the permission of
the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown copyright reserved Licence Number: AL52185A0001
Recorded By: Checked By: Approved By:
Date: Date: Date:
Form No. IssueNo.RevisionNo Issue Date
Burton and South Derbyshire College
Phillip.Rowlay Phillip.Rowlay
21/03/2014 21/03/2014
Philip Rowlay
21/03/2014
2.03SE-GOA-F-011 23/08/2013
Denotes Site Location
Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Site Location Plan Scale
Not To ScaleProject No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonald Ltd Figure No.
1Employer
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION CPlans and Drawings
EXPLORATORY HOLELOCATION PLAN
section title sheets x25.indd 23 14/03/2013 16:17
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
SECTION DPhotographs
SOIL SAMPLE / ROCK CORE /CONCRETE CORE PHOTOGRAPHS
section title sheets x25.indd 24 14/03/2013 16:17
Filename 1 Box 1
Filename 2 Box 2
Form No. IssueNo.RevisionNo Issue Date
04/03/2014
2.04 05/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
Plate No.
01Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
SE-SDP-F-005
10.00m to 13.30m
13.30m to 16.25m
Photographed by Date photographed
Tim Emson
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photographic Record Hole ID
BH01Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonalds
Filename 1 Box 3
Filename 2 Box 4
Form No. IssueNo.RevisionNo Issue Date
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photographic Record Hole ID
BH01Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonalds Plate No.
02Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
SE-SDP-F-005 2.04 05/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
16.25m to 19.35m
19.35m to 20.50m
Photographed by Date photographed
Tim Emson 04/03/2014
Filename 1 Box 1
Filename 2 Box 2
Form No. IssueNo.RevisionNo Issue Date
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photographic Record Hole ID
BH02Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonalds Plate No.
03Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
SE-SDP-F-005 2.04 05/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
10.40m to 13.50m
13.50m to 16.70m
Photographed by Date photographed
Joesph Levien 24/02/2014
Filename 1 Box 3
Filename 2 Box 4
Form No. IssueNo.RevisionNo Issue Date
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photographic Record Hole ID
BH02Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonalds Plate No.
04Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
SE-SDP-F-005 2.04 05/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
16.70m to 19.40m
19.40m to 20.50m
Photographed by Date photographed
Joesph Levien 24/02/2014
Filename 1 Box 1
Filename 2 Box 2
Form No. IssueNo.RevisionNo Issue Date
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photographic Record Hole ID
BH04Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonalds Plate No.
05Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
SE-SDP-F-005 2.04 05/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
10.50m to 14.45m
14.45m to 17.30m
Photographed by Date photographed
Tim Emson 04/03/2014
Filename 1 Box 3
Filename 2 Box 4
Form No. IssueNo.RevisionNo Issue Date
Project Name Burton and South Derbyshire UTC Photographic Record Hole ID
BH04Project No. TA7329
Engineer Mott MacDonalds Plate No.
06Employer Burton and South Derbyshire College
SE-SDP-F-005 2.04 05/11/2012 Part of the Bachy Soletanche Group
17.30m to 19.95m
19.95m to 20.30m
Photographed by Date photographed
Tim Emson 04/03/2014
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
APPENDIX 1Explanatory Notes on Fieldwork, Loggingand Laboratory Testing
FIELDWORK PROCEDURES
section title sheets x25.indd 2 14/03/2013 16:17
APPENDIX 1: FIELDWORK PROCEDURES
1.0 CABLE PERCUSSION BORING TECHNIQUES
Unless otherwise stated the light cable percussion technique of ‘soft ground’ boring has been employed in theformation of boreholes for this contract. In cohesive soils a clay cutter has been used to advance the boreholeswhilst in granular deposits a shell has been employed. The combination of clay cutter and shell bring updisturbed material which is generally sufficiently representative to permit identification of the strata. Whilstthese particular techniques allow the maximum data to be obtained on strata conditions, a degree of mixingof some layered soils (e.g. thin layers of coarse and fine granular material) is inevitable.
2.0 DYNAMIC SAMPLING
As an alternative to cable percussion boring, Soil Engineering employs a number of techniques for the samplingof soils. The most common alternative techniques comprise some form of dynamic sampling system whichinvolves sampling tubes being driven into the ground by means of a sliding weight.
‘Window sampling’ techniques form the most common type of dynamic sampling and typically comprise 1.0mlong steel cylinders with elongated windows. These are driven to the required depth by the use of a percussivehammer. In the ‘windowless’ mode a plastic liner can be placed in the steel cylinders such that effectivelycontinuous sampling can be undertaken. This method of sampling only produces Quality Class 3 or 4 sampleswhich are not suitable for any form of laboratory machine testing.
3.0 ROUTINE SAMPLING
In the UK “undisturbed” samples of predominantly cohesive soils have historically generally been obtained in a102mm diameter open drive sampler as described in the British Standard Code of Practice BS 5930: 1999 (ref 01).These samplers are known as U100 and historically are of two types; a metal tube or a plastic liner. BS EN ISO 22475-1: 2006 (ref 03) however makes it clear that such samplers will not produce a quality class 1 sample. It is this classof sample that is required for laboratory machine testing.
Alternative methods of sampling which will produce a class 1 sample are available and these include pistonsamplers, Shelby tubes and the UT100. The latter is a modification of the U100 and classifies as a thin wall samplerand as such is capable of obtaining class 1 samples. It should be noted however that this type of sampler is onlysuitable for certain ground conditions and cannot be used in very stiff to hard cohesive soils or in very granularcohesive soils. Equally other thin walled samplers such as the piston sampler are more appropriate for very soft andsoft cohesive soils.
Soil Engineering recognise that in certain soil types, there will not be a single solution to sampling and it will benecessary to utilise a variety of sampling techniques in order to obtain the best quality samples possible. Suchtechniques may include rotary coring and this is described in section 4.0. For some ‘difficult’ soil types it may not bepossible to obtain truly undisturbed samples, and engineering judgement will be required if such samples are to beused for geotechnical laboratory testing. Where such challenging soil types have been encountered and alternativesampling techniques used, this is discussed in the report text.
Page 1 of 4 Issue 2.0
Appendix 1 - Fieldwork Procedures_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:21 Page 1
APPENDIX 1: FIELDWORK PROCEDURES
Page 2 of 4 Issue 2.0
In granular deposits and mixed cohesive granular deposits where it is not possible to recover undisturbed samples,either large or small disturbed samples are normally obtained. The size of these samples are in accordance with therequirements of BS 5930: 1999 whilst the frequency of sampling is unique to this contract.
It is important to note that the number of blows taken to drive any kind of sampling tube is not necessarily indicativeof the strength of the material being sampled. For this reason Soil Engineering recommends that no attempt is madeto correlate such blows with the strength of cohesive strata.
4.0 ROTARY DRILLING
Where rotary open hole drilling techniques have been employed it is important to note that descriptions of thestrata encountered are generally solely based on the lead drillers observations of cuttings and drill flushreturns. Whilst such techniques can provide useful information in certain ground conditions it should berecognised that an accurate determination of subsurface rock strata can only be obtained by rotary coringtechniques.
An examination of rock cores obtained by rotary drilling generally enables bedding planes, fissuring andconsistency to be observed but does not necessarily reveal the presence of vertical fissures or joints. Where anappropriate core diameter and flushing medium have been used, sub-sampling of the core immediatelyfollowing removal from the core barrel can produce quality Class 1 samples. Such samples require to be sealedand waxed in order to prevent moisture loss.
Details of the strata encountered are given on the borehole log along with the geologist’s assessment of TotalCore Recovery (TCR), Solid Core Recovery (SCR) and Rock Quality Designation (RQD) each expressed as apercentage of the individual core runs. When appropriate the Fracture Index (FI) or Fracture Spacing (If) is alsogiven on the logs and represents respectively the number of natural fractures per metre run of core for corethat has a similar intensity of fracturing, or the minimum, average and maximum spacing of such naturalfractures over an arbitrary length of core of similar intensity of fracturing.
The symbols and abbreviations used on the rotary borehole logs are explained on the exploratory hole legendand notation sheet that precedes the exploratory hole records. It is considered however that the meaning ofthe abbreviations NI and NA needs further clarification. NI denotes material recovered non intact and appliesto material that has numerous fractures or incipient fractures and which is either naturally broken up or whichbecomes broken up by drilling activities. The result in both cases is that the core is recovered in a highlyfragmented state, generally as a gravel. The term NA is the abbreviation for not applicable and refers to anymaterials to which determination of a fracture index would be inappropriate, i.e. for clay bands.
Where significant core loss (>300mm) has occurred, it is Soil Engineering general policy to insert a separate‘stratum’ on the log to coincide with the inferred zone of core loss. Unless there is good evidence as to the rock(or soil) type that has been lost, the legend column is left blank. For zones of inferred mine workings, anappropriate legend is used and this together with all the legends used on the logs is shown on the log notationsheet that precedes the exploratory logs in the report.
A summary of logging methodology for rock strata and core measurements is given in Appendix 1: Terminologyused in the Description and Classification of Rocks.
Appendix 1 - Fieldwork Procedures_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:21 Page 2
APPENDIX 1: FIELDWORK PROCEDURES
5.0 IN SITU DYNAMIC PENETRATION TESTS
The Standard Penetration Test using either a split spoon (SPT) or a solid cone (SPT(C)), is generally employedwhere undisturbed samples cannot be obtained e.g. in granular soils, fill and rock etc, in order to obtain anindication of the in situ density, compaction or hardness. It can also be used as an alternative to undisturbedsampling in cohesive deposits. Inherent difficulties are present in obtaining true SPT or SPT(C) "N" values inwater bearing fine grained granular deposits and careful consideration of the test technique and groundwaterconditions are necessary before test results are used for design purposes.
The full procedure for carrying out the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) is given in BS EN ISO 22476-3: 2005 (ref02). For fine to medium granular deposits and in clays the test consists of driving a 50mm external diametersplit barrel sampler into the soil using a 63.5kg hammer dropping 760mm. In coarse granular soils or in rock,the split barrel may be replaced by a solid cone. The penetration resistance is expressed as the number ofblows required to obtain 300mm penetration below an initial seating drive of 150mm through any disturbedground at the bottom of the borehole. The number of blows for the 300mm test drive penetration is recordedon the borehole logs as the "N" value. A full record of the number of blows required to drive the sampler at75mm intervals throughout the total 450mm drive is also tabulated along with the groundwater level at thetime of test. Where full 450mm penetration is not achieved, it is important to distinguish how the blow countrelates to the penetration of the sampler and this may be achieved in the following manner:
(i) Where the test drive is terminated before full (300mm) penetration the number of blows for the partialtest drive (usually 50) and the penetration of the sampler within the test drive are recorded. Anapproximate "N" value may be obtained by linear extrapolation of the number of blows recorded for thepartial test drive.
(ii) If the total seating drive penetration is equal to or less than 150mm then the number of blows (usually25) and the depth of penetration within the initial seating penetration are recorded on the borehole logs.
The "N" value obtained from the Standard Penetration Test may be used to assess the relative density of sands andgravels in accordance with Clause 41.3.2 of BS 5930: 1999 (ref 01), as shown in table 1.
It should be noted that the "N" values reported on the logs are uncorrected, as specified in section 7.1.2 of BSEN ISO 22476-3:2005.
SPT's performed by Soil Engineering are carried out using automatic trip hammers that have been calibratedin accordance with BS EN ISO 22476-3:2005. The hammer ID and energy ratio are recorded on the ‘headerpage’ of each log and calibration certificates for the hammers used on the project are contained in theAppendix Section of the report, as required by BS EN ISO 22476-3:2005.
TABLE 1: DETERMINATION OF RELATIVE DENSITY FROM PENETRATION TESTS (from BS 5930)
Term SPT N-Value: Blows/300mm PenetrationVery Loose 0-4Loose 4-10Medium Dense 10-30Dense 30-50Very Dense Over 50
Page 3 of 4 Issue 2.0
Appendix 1 - Fieldwork Procedures_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:21 Page 3
APPENDIX 1: FIELDWORK PROCEDURES
Page 4 of 4 Issue 2.0
It should be noted that it is a requirement of BS EN ISO 22476-3: 2005 that all test hammers are calibrated.Soil Engineering routinely calibrate all their test hammers and the results of the calibration are expressed asan Energy Ratio (Er) on the exploratory hole logs. The Er value is required for design purposes and should beapplied to the recorded test N value in the manner described in BS EN ISO 22476-3: 2005.
Standard Penetration Testing may also be performed in very stiff/hard clays in which it would be difficult toobtain undisturbed samples. In such cases the SPT "N" values may be used for design purposes based oncorrelations between "N" value and various soil parameters such as those proposed by Stroud and Butler(1975) (ref 04) and by Stroud (1989) (ref 05).
6.0 GROUNDWATER
The groundwater conditions entered on the exploratory hole records are those encountered at the time of theinvestigation. These however, may not represent the actual conditions or those which may apply in largeexcavations. The normal rate of boring does not always permit the recording of an equilibrium water level forany one water strike, particularly because the entry of water into a borehole may be reduced or even eliminateddue to casing off a water bearing layer or due to a skin being formed on the borehole wall by the drilling tools.It should also be noted that groundwater conditions may vary seasonally and/or tidally and that the water levelsas shown at the time of investigation should not necessarily be taken as being constant because they may besubject to such fluctuations.
More accurate information on groundwater conditions can be obtained from exploratory hole installationssuch as piezometers and standpipes. Normally a minimum of three or four monitoring visits are required at thesite to provide this information.
References
01) BS 5930: 1999: Code of Practice for Site Investigation. British Standards Institution.
02) BS EN ISO 22476-3: 2005: Geotechnical Investigation and Testing - Field Testing - Part 3: StandardPenetration Test.
03) BS EN ISO 22475-1: 2006: Geotechnical Investigation and Testing - Sampling Methods and Groundwatermeasurements - Part 1: Technical Principles for Execution.
04) Stroud, M.A, Butler, F.G April 1975: ‘The Standard Penetration Test and the Engineering Properties ofGlacial Materials’. The Engineering Behaviour of Glacial Materials Proc. of Symp.
05) Stroud, M.A. 1989: 'The Standard Penetration Test - Its Application and Interpretation. Thomas Telford,London.
Appendix 1 - Fieldwork Procedures_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:21 Page 4
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
APPENDIX 1Explanatory Notes on Fieldwork, Loggingand Laboratory Testing
TERMINOLOGY USED IN SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
section title sheets x25.indd 3 14/03/2013 16:17
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
1.0 GENERAL PROCEDURES
Soil descriptions contained in this report have been produced in accordance with the procedures and principlesgiven in BS EN ISO 14688-1: 2002 (ref 01), BS EN ISO 14688-2: 2004 (ref 02) and also where there is no conflictwith the European standards, in accordance with BS 5930: 1999 (ref 03).
For a soil description the main soil characteristics should be given in a standard word order although the wordorder can be adjusted to enhance and clarify if appropriate. The main soil characteristics can be divided as follows:-
1 Mass Characteristics 2 Material Characteristicscomprising state and structure comprising nature and state
1a Density and Field Strength 2a Colour1b Discontinuities 2b Composite Soil Types: particle grading and1c Bedding composition, shape and size
2c Principal Soil Type, name in capitals eg CLAY
3 Stratum Name (optional)3a Geological group or Formation
The basic soil categories may be broadly summarised as follows, with categories i to iii covered by these notesand categories iv and v by separate notes.
(i) Very coarse soils: greater than 63mm in diameter, ie cobbles and boulders.(ii) Coarse soils: 0.063mm to 63mm in diameter, ie sands and gravels.(iii) Fine soils: less than 0.063mm in diameter, ie clays and silts.(iv) Organic soils.(v) Man made "soils".
2.0 MASS CHARACTERISTICS OF SOILS
2.1 Cohesive SoilsFor cohesive material determination of consistency is made in accordance with Table 1. The undrainedshear strength of clays is determined by laboratory or field testing and is made in accordance with theterms given in Table 2.
TABLE 1: CONSISTENCY GUIDE FOR COHESIVE MATERIAL (from BS EN ISO 14688-1: 2002)
Term Field IdentificationVery Soft Exudes between fingers when squeezed in the hand Soft Can be moulded by light finger pressure Firm Cannot be moulded, but can be rolled into 3mm thick thread Stiff Crumbles when rolled into 3mm thick thread Very Stiff Cannot be moulded and crumbles under pressure. Indented by thumbnail
Page 1 of 6 Issue 2.0
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Soil_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:15 Page 1
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
Page 2 of 6 Issue 2.0
TABLE 2: STRENGTH TERMS OF FINE SOILS (from BS EN ISO 14688-2: 2004)
Strength Term Undrained shear strength (Cu) kPaExtremely Low <10Very Low 10 to 20Low 20 to 40Medium 40 to 75High 75 to 150Very High 150 to 300Extremely High1 >300
1 Materials with shear strengths greater than 300kPa may behave as weak rocks and should be described in accordance with BS EN ISO 14689-1
2.2 Granular SoilsFor granular deposits relative density may only be determined by the Standard Penetration Test (SPT).The following table provides a scale of terms related to SPT ‘N’ values from BS 5930: 1999 (ref 03).
TABLE 3: ASSESSMENT OF RELATIVE DENSITY FOR GRANULAR SOILS (from BS 5930: 1999)
Term Field Identification (generally in trial pits) SPT ‘N’ Values(blows for 300mm penetration)
Very loose Can be excavated with a spade 0-4 Loose and 50mm wooden peg can be easily driven 4-10
Medium dense - 10-30 Dense Requires pick for excavation 30-50 Very dense and 50mm wooden peg is hard to drive over 50
N.B: The field identification terms for very loose/loose material and dense/very dense material are very subjective and should be treated with caution.
2.3 DiscontinuitiesThe type of discontinuity should be described eg fissures, faults and shear planes together with theirspacing as given in Table 4. Discontinuity openness, and surface texture eg rough, smooth, polished andstriated are recorded although these may not always be added to the borehole log if the required levelof detail is low.
2.4 BeddingBedding spacing is assessed using the thickness terms given in Table 4.
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Soil_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:15 Page 2
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
TABLE 4: DESCRIPTIONS FOR DISCONTINUITIES AND BEDDING (from BS 5930: 1999)
DISCONTINUITIES BEDDINGScale of SpacingTerm Mean Spacing mm Scale of BeddingTerm Mean Thickness mm
Very widely >2000 Very thickly bedded >2000Widely 2000-600 Thickly bedded 2000-600Medium 600-200 Medium bedded 600-200Closely 200-60 Thinly bedded 200-60Very closely 60-20 Very thinly bedded 60-20Extremely closely <20 Thickly laminated 20-6
Thinly laminated <6
N.B: Spacing terms are also used for describing the distance between partings, isolated beds, laminae or roots etc.Interbedded/interlaminated: alternating layers of different material type. These terms are given a thickness if material is present in equal proportions.Otherwise the thickness of and spacing between subordinate layers are defined.
3.0 MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL
An examination of insitu soil deposits, disturbed or undisturbed samples allows the material characteristics tobe recorded. These characteristics include colour, particle shape, particle grading and particle composition.
3.1 ColourThe recorded colour is based on the logger’s general impression of the overall colour. For material withmore than three colours the term multicoloured may be used. The term mottled is applied to soils whichexhibit two colours, one of which is subordinate to the other.
White, cream, grey, black, yellow, orange, red, brown, green and blue etc may be used but supplementedas necessary with: light, dark, mottled and reddish brownish etc. All colouration associated withchemical changes is noted ie grey gleying on fissures.
3.2 Soil Types (Including Composite Soils)
3.2.1 Very Coarse Soils (Boulders and Cobbles)Where the soil sample is considered large enough to be representative, material is described as shownin Table 5.
TABLE 5: DESCRIPTORS FOR VERY COARSE SOILS (from BS 5930: 1999)
Main Name Estimated Boulder/Cobble Content of Very Coarse FractionBOULDERS Over 50% is of boulder size (>200mm)COBBLES Over 50% is of cobble size (200mm to 63mm)
Mixtures of very coarse and finer materials are described by combining terms for the very coarse constituentswith those for the finer constituents as shown in Table 6.
Page 3 of 6 Issue 2.0
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Soil_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:15 Page 3
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
Page 4 of 6 Issue 2.0
TABLE 6: DESCRIPTORS FOR MIXTURES OF VERY COARSE AND FINER SOILS (from BS 5930: 1999)
Term Composition (Approx %) BOULDERS (or COBBLES) with a little finer material (1) Up to 5% finer material BOULDERS (or COBBLES) with some finer material (1) 5% to 20% finer material BOULDERS (or COBBLES) with much finer material (1) 20% to 50% finer material FINER MATERIAL with low boulder content <5% boulders FINER MATERIAL with low cobble content <10% cobbles FINER MATERIAL with medium boulder content 5% to 20% boulders FINER MATERIAL with medium cobble content 10% to 20% cobbles FINER MATERIAL with high boulder content (or cobbles) >20% boulders or cobbles
(1) The description of "finer material" is made in accordance with BS 5930: 1999 ignoring the very coarse fraction; the principal soil type name of the finermaterial may also be given in capital letters, e.g. sandy GRAVEL with low boulder content; COBBLES with some sandy CLAY.
3.2.2 Coarse Soils (Gravel and Sand)A coarse soil (omitting any cobbles and boulders) contains 65% or more of SAND or GRAVEL. The termsgiven in Table 7 are used to describe the coarse fraction.
TABLE 7: DESCRIPTORS FOR MIXTURES OF COARSE SOILS (from BS 5930: 1999)
Term Principal Soil Type Approximate Proportion of Secondary Constituent
Slightly sandy or gravelly SAND <5% Sandy or gravelly or 5% to 20% Very sandy or gravelly GRAVEL >20% - SAND and GRAVEL About equal proportions
3.2.3 Fine Soils and Mixtures of Fine and Coarse SoilsFine soil should be described as either a SILT or a CLAY. The use of silty CLAY or clayey SILT is howeverpermitted, where the presence of the secondary constituent is considered important.
For deposits that contain a mixture of soil types the descriptors given in Table 8 are used. The dominantsecondary fraction is placed immediately before the principal soil type. It should also be noted that theterms silty and clayey are mutually exclusive in a coarse soil. The use of the terms sandy and gravellyare however permitted.
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Soil_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:15 Page 4
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
TABLE 8: DESCRIPTORS FOR FINE SOILS AND COMPOSITE SOIL TYPES (from BS 5930: 1999)
Term Principal Soil Type Approximate Proportion of Secondary ConstituentCoarse Soil Coarse and/or Fine Soil
Slightly clayey or silty SAND and/or <5% and/or sandy or gravelly Clayey or silty and/or GRAVEL 5% - 20% *sandy or gravellyVery clayey or silty and/ >20% *or sandy or gravellyVery sandy or gravelly SILT or >65% +Sandy and/or gravelly CLAY 35% - 65%Slightly sandy and/or <35%gravelly
* or described as fine soil depending on assessed engineering behaviour+ or described as coarse soil depending on assessed engineering behaviour
3.3 Particle Shape and GradingFor coarser granular deposits (gravel and cobbles) the particle shape is described as shown in Table 9.A schematic of angularity and form terms is given in Figure 1.
TABLE 9: DESCRIPTORS FOR PARTICLE SHAPE (from BS EN ISO 14688-1: 2002)
Angularity Form Surface Texture Very Angular CubicAngular Flat Rough Subangular Elongated Smooth Subrounded RoundedWell Rounded
The distribution of particle sizes within sands and gravels is described stating the predominant size fractionpresent eg fine to medium SAND.
Page 5 of 6 Issue 2.0
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Soil_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:15 Page 5
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
Page 6 of 6 Issue 2.0
FIGURE 1: PARTICLE ANGULARITY AND FORM TERMS (from BS 5930: 1999 and Soil Engineering)
References
01) BS EN ISO 14688-1: 2002: Geotechnical Investigation and Testing - Identification and Classification of SoilPart 1: Identification and Description.
02) BS EN ISO 14688-2: 2004: Geotechnical Investigation and Testing - Identification and Classification of SoilPart 2: Principles for a Classification.
03) BS 5930: 1999: Code of Practice for Site Investigation. British Standards Institution.
AngularVery Angular Subangular Subrounded Rounded Well Rounded
Flat or tabular Elongated
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Soil_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:15 Page 6
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
APPENDIX 1Explanatory Notes on Fieldwork, Loggingand Laboratory Testing
TERMINOLOGY USED IN THEDESCRIPTION OF MADE GROUND
section title sheets x25.indd 6 14/03/2013 16:17
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE DESCRIPTION OF MADE GROUND
1.0 GENERAL DEFINITIONS
Man made soils may be defined as those materials that have not been laid down by geomorphologicalprocesses. Under the heading of ‘man made soils’ two distinct material types can be identified as follows:-
TABLE 1: DEFINITIONS FOR MAN MADE SOILS
Term DescriptionNATURAL SOILS Use terminology outlined for soils in BS EN ISO 14688-1: 2002 (ref 01), BS EN ISO 14688-2: 2004 (Reworked) (ref 02) and BS 5930: 1999 (ref 03). Can be described using normal approach for soils. Can be
tested in accordance with BS1377: 1990.
MAN MADE Can also frequently be described using normal approach and terminology as above, and MATERIALS tested geotechnically.
Includes materials that defy description in any standard manner and includes a range of exotic materials and artifacts. Often not testable in the field or in the laboratory. For exampleit is not possible to measure strength of a bicycle frame or liquid limit of plastic.
There is also a distinction between the terms "Fill" and "Made Ground" as follows:
FILL = Material placed under engineering controlMADE GROUND = Material placed without any kind of control, ie non engineered
2.0 IDENTIFICATION OF MAN MADE SOILS
Some common examples of man made soils are given in Table 2 on page 2. The table illustrates that theheading of ‘man made’ soils can cover a wide variety of materials, some of which may not readily appear to beanything other than natural.
Natural soils re-laid by man may be difficult to identify as such and so it is necessary to look for evidence inthe form of artifacts or relic structure in the material.
For example as few as one or two artifacts may be diagnostic (rare brick fragments or car body at base of trialpit). Lenses or pockets of clay that are laminated etc help to indicate natural material that has been relaid.However be aware of the following:
Contamination by driller (Clinker from around rig, green grass from 15m…).Contamination during trial pitting (brick rubble can fall from the upper layers in a pit and then get pushed into natural deposits by the action of the excavator bucket).
Page 1 of 4 Issue 2.0
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Made Ground_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:23 Page 1
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE DESCRIPTION OF MADE GROUND
Page 2 of 4 Issue 2.0
TABLE 2: DEFINITIONS FOR MAN MADE SOILS
CATEGORY EXAMPLENatural Soils re-laid by man Embankment Fill
Colliery Spoil (Coarse Discard) Drainage Layer e.g Gravel
Man Made Materials that can be described and Abutment backfill e.g Crushed rock which are testable geotechnically Colliery Spoil (Fine Discard)
Mine Tailings from non-coal mines Crushed Concrete Pulverised Fuel Ash (PFA) Chalk whiting (slurry from cement manufacture)
Man Made Materials that are NOT readily Landfilldescribable and which are not testable Demolition rubble (including frames, slates etc)geotechnically Fly tipped materials
Burgy (glass work waste)
3.0 DESCRIPTION OF MAN MADE SOILS
Information that is be reported to define the material includes the following:-
Origin of materials, if known from desk study.Layers and their inclination to inform on mode of tipping, whether ponded, end tipped, spread or stockpiled.Large objects, obstructions such as concrete, masonry walls, old cars.Presence of hollow objects, compressible/collapsible objects or voids such as oil drums, cellars, tanks.Chemical wastes and dangerous or hazardous substances such as creosote, hospital wastes, unlabelled drums,asbestos.Decomposable materials with note on degree of decomposition such as garden waste, paper.Smell such as organic, phenolic, sulphurous, petrol.Striking coloursAny dating possible such as type of bottles, newspapers, papers.Signs of heat or combustion such as steam, smoke, burnt shale.
NOTES
Because of the variability of the constituents of man made soils, strength or in situ density descriptors are notgenerally assigned to made ground. Where describing fill as opposed to made ground it may be possible to usethe descriptors that are used for natural soils. Large or hollow objects cannot be sampled so the description is the sole information on condition andcharacter of the features. The constituents of made ground are grouped together under the above categories and it is usual to givevolumetric percentages where possible.
Granular made ground may be given a particle size, although the following description methodology isemployed. MADE GROUND: Grey fine to coarse gravel sized fragments of brick and concrete.
OR
MADE GROUND: Grey gravelly clay with occasional subangular cobble sized fragments of brick. Gravel sizedfragments are angular to subangular, fine, medium and coarse of brick.
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Made Ground_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:23 Page 2
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE DESCRIPTION OF MADE GROUND
In these two examples, note the use of term ‘sized fragments’ to describe the granular content. Because thematerial is man made we do not use the terms sand, gravel or cobbles etc in the same context as for naturalsoils. In other words it would be incorrect to use the following:
MADE GROUND: Grey gravelly clay with occasional cobbles. Gravel is angular coarse of brick, cobbles arerounded of brick.
The use of sand, gravel or cobble prior to ‘sized fragments’ is only intended to define a size range to thegranular made ground material.
Similar grain size indicators are also used to describe the size of other man made materials such as concrete,bituminous road surfacing etc. In addition the terms can also be used to describe natural material that has beenmodified by man, such as wood that may be present in the form of railway sleepers etc. Where whole manmade items are identified they should be described as follows:
‘with numerous wooden railway sleepers’
For such materials it is necessary to add size measurements, since no other quantifying terms are used.
4.0 DEFINITIONS OF SOME MAN MADE SOILS
There is generally a lack of national guidance on the meaning of common terms used in made ground. Thisapplies particularly to man made materials. For this reason descriptions of man made soils within this reportaim to provide as much information as possible on the material being logged, whilst staying within theguidance provided in these notes.
For some sites a set of definitions for the likely range of made ground to be encountered may have beendetermined and where this is the case it is identified within the report text.
Some terms for one group of commonly encountered made ground are given below.
COMBUSTION PRODUCTS, often physically unstable and usually containing concentrations of metals andpoly-aromatic hydrocarbons. The definitions below are workable compromises.
ASH: Sand or silt size by definition, so do not need but can use "ash sand", and cannot have "gravel size ash"although cinders can be gravel size but readily crush down. Can include unburnt coal.
CLINKER: Gravel size or larger by definition so do not need but can use "clinker gravel", and cannot have "sandsize clinker".
SLAG: Materials fused or poured as liquid or scum or froth, of any size or shape, and will be at least strong. Ifin blocks or layers, can present difficulties for borehole or trial pit penetration. Slag is often pelletised,expanded or crushed for reuse in construction.
Page 3 of 4 Issue 2.0
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Made Ground_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:23 Page 3
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE DESCRIPTION OF MADE GROUND
Page 4 of 4 Issue 2.0
References
01) BS EN ISO 14688-1: 2002: Geotechnical Investigation and Testing - Identification and Classification of SoilPart 1: Identification and Description.
02) BS EN ISO 14688-2: 2004: Geotechnical Investigation and Testing - Identification and Classification of SoilPart 2: Principles for a Classification.
03) BS 5930: 1999: Code of Practice for Site Investigation. British Standards Institution.
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Made Ground_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:23 Page 4
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
APPENDIX 1Explanatory Notes on Fieldwork, Loggingand Laboratory Testing
TERMINOLOGY USED IN THEDESCRIPTION ANDCLASSIFICATION OF ROCKS
section title sheets x25.indd 4 14/03/2013 16:17
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF ROCKS
1.0 GENERAL PROCEDURES
Rock descriptions contained in this report have been produced in accordance with the procedure and principlesgiven in BS EN ISO 14689-1: 2003 (ref 01) and where there is no conflict with the European standards inaccordance with BS 5930: 1999: Section 6 (ref 02). For rock descriptions the main rock characteristics should begiven in a standard word order. The description and classification is therefore based on the following:-
1 Material Characteristics 2 General Information1a Strength 2a Minor Constituents1b Structure 2b Geological Formation1c Colour1d Texture1e Grain size1f Weathering and alteration effects1g Rock name (in capitals e.g. SANDSTONE)
3 Mass Characteristics3a State of weathering3b Fracture state3c Discontinuities
2.0 MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ROCK
2.1 StrengthThe descriptors given in Table 1 are used to assess rock strength.
TABLE 1: DESCRIPTORS AND FIELD IDENTIFICATION FOR ROCK STRENGTH
Term FIELD IDENTIFICATION UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (MPa)
Extremely weak1 Indented by thumbnail <1Very weak Crumbles under firm blows with point of geological 1 to 5
hammer, can be peeled by pocket knifeWeak Can be peeled by pocket knife with difficulty, shallow indentations 5 to 25
can be made by firm blow with point of geological hammerMedium strong Cannot be scraped or peeled with a pocket knife, specimen 25 to 50
can be fractured with a single firm blow of geological hammerStrong Specimen requires more than one blow of geological hammer to 50 to 100
fracture itVery strong Specimen requires many blows of geological hammer to fracture it 100 to 250Extremely strong Specimen can only be chipped with geological hammer >250
1 Some extremely weak rocks will behave as soils and should be described as soils in accordance with BS EN ISO 14688-1
Page 1 of 6 Issue 2.0
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Rocks_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:34 Page 1
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF ROCKS
Page 2 of 6 Issue 2.0
2.2 StructureThe descriptive terms for structure cover the inter-relationship of lithology and textural features in therock. Terms include: bedding, laminated, foliated and banded. The thicknesses of these structures aredescribed by the terms given in table 2 which also apply to the spacing of discontinuities (see section 4.3).
TABLE 2: DESCRIPTIVE TERMS FOR STRUCTURE AND DISCONTINUITY SPACING (from BS EN ISO 14689-1: 2003)
STRUCTURE DISCONTINUITY SPACING (EG BEDDING, CLEAVAGE) (EG JOINT, FISSURE) Very thickly (bedded) Very widely (jointed) > 2m Thickly (bedded) Widely (jointed) 0.6m-2m Medium (bedded) Medium (jointed) 0.2m-0.6m Thinly (bedded) Closely (jointed) 60mm-200mm Very thinly (bedded) Very closely (jointed) 20mm-60mm Laminated Extremely closely (jointed) 6mm-20mm Thinly laminated - < 6mm
2.3 ColourColour is described according to the scheme given in BS EN IS0 14689-1.
2.4 TextureA description of rock texture is not normally required but when used refers to the arrangement ofindividual grains in the rock. Terms which may be used include: porphyritic, crystalline, amorphous andvitreous. For further guidance refer to BS 5930: 1999: section 44.2.4 (ref 02).
2.5 Grain SizeThe descriptive scheme given in Table 14 of BS 5930: 1999 (ref 02) is used together with the accompanyingnotes in section 44.2.5.
2.6 Weathering and Alteration EffectsThe results of weathering or alteration of the rock material are described in accordance with the principalsgiven for rock mass in section 4.0.
2.7 Rock NameAn aid to the identification of rock type is given in Table A1 of BS EN ISO 14689-1:2003 (ref 01).
3.0 GENERAL INFORMATION
3.1 Minor/Other CharacteristicsInformation can include minor constituents as for soils (see Terminology used in Soil Descriptions) andcan include abnormal mineralogy, presence of vugs etc.
3.2 Geological FormationThe geological formation, age and type of deposit are only given where this can be done with confidenceand where no conjecture is involved.
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Rocks_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:34 Page 2
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF ROCKS
4.0 MASS CHARACTERISTICS
4.1 Description of Weathering for the Rock MassApproach 1 in BS 5930 1999, provides guidance on the factual description of weathering effects at thematerial and mass scales. This factual description is mandatory and requires the following indicators ofweathering to be described:
- Changes in colour - Changes in fracture state - Reduction in strength - Presence, character & extent of weathering products
When further classification is required, use is made of Approach 4 in Figure 19 of BS 5930 and this tableis reproduced as Table 3. Approach 4 is used for many specific formations in the UK, such as LondonClay, Lias Clay and Mercia Mudstone. Chalk however is classified under Approach 5 as a special case.
It should be noted that Tables 2 and 13 in BS EN ISO 14689-1 are not relevant to the majority of rocksin the UK and are not reproduced in these notes.
TABLE 3: CLASSIFICATION OF WEATHERING INCORPORATING MATERIAL AND MASS FEATURES (Approach 4 inBS 5930 1999)
CLASS CLASSIFIER TYPICAL CHARACTERISTICSA Unweathered Original strength, colour and fracture spacing B Partially Slightly reduced strength, slightly closer fracture spacing,
Weathered weathering penetrating in from fractures. Brown oxidation C Distinctly Further weakened, much closer fracture spacing, grey
Weathered reduction D Destructured Greatly weakened, mottled, ordered lithorelics in matrix becoming
weakened and disordered E Residual or Matrix with occasional altered random lithorelics, bedding
reworked destroyed. Classed as reworked if with foreign inclusions
4.2 Fracture StateFor the purposes of logging and the recording of mechanical properties, fractures include: Joints (adiscontinuity in the body of the rock along which there has been no visible displacement), Faults (afracture along which there has been visible displacement), Bedding Fracture (a fracture along thebedding) and Cleavage Fracture (a fracture along a cleavage).
Fracture state is recorded in accordance with the terms detailed in BS EN ISO 22475-1: 2006 (ref 03) as follows:
Solid core Core with at least one full diameter (but not necessarily a full circumference) between two naturalfractures. By this definition core that has a single set of inclined fractures would have a solid corerecovery of 100%. Where there are two or more sets of non parallel fractures only sections of the corein which the fractures actually intersect are excluded from the assessment of solid core.
Based on these definitions the terms in Table 4 are defined and these are shown schematically in Figure 1.
Page 3 of 6 Issue 2.0
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Rocks_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:34 Page 3
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF ROCKS
Page 4 of 6 Issue 2.0
TABLE 4: DESCRIPTORS FOR THE MECHANICAL LOGGING OF ROCK CORE
TERM ABBREVIATION DEFINITION Total Core Recovery TCR (%) The percentage ratio of core recovered (both solid and non-intact)
to the total length of core runSolid Core Recovery SCR (%) The percentage of solid core recovered to total length of core run Rock Quality RQD(%) The total length of solid core pieces greater than 100mm betweenDesignation natural fractures expressed as a percentage of total length of core run Fracture Index FI The number of natural fractures contained within a metre of core
of similar intensity of fracturing. This need not correspond to core runs. (NI) is used to denote non intact fragmented core.
Fracture Spacing If The minimum, average & maximum spacing of natural fractures min within core of similar intensity of fracturing. This need not correspondave to core runs. (NI) is used to denote non intact fragmented core. max
FIGURE 1: ILLUSTRATION OF FRACTURE LOGGING TERMS
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Rocks_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:34 Page 4
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF ROCKS
4.3 DiscontinuitiesDiscontinuities are breaks in the rock mass and when observed in rock cores are described as:
Joint, Fissure, Fault, Induced Fracture, Incipient Fracture, Bedding Fracture and Vein. Descriptive termsfor discontinuities are given below in the correct order:
Spacing: Described in accordance with Table 1 Persistence: Discontinuous or Continuous Roughness: See Table 5 Aperture: See Table 6 Infill: See Table 7
TABLE 5: DESCRIPTORS FOR DISCONTINUITY ROUGHNESS (After BS EN ISO 14689-1: 2003)
MEDIUM SCALE SMALL SCALE DESCRIPTORS DESCRIPTORS Rough (irregular) Smooth Stepped Stepped rough Stepped smooth Undulating Undulating rough Undulating smoothPlanar Planar rough Planar smooth
Note: The large scale terms: wavy, curved and straight are only seen at the mass scale and are not observed in rock cores.
TABLE 6: DESCRIPTORS FOR DISCONTINUITY APERTURE (After BS EN ISO 14689-1: 2003)
APERTURE SIZE TERM APERTURE Very Tight <0.1mmTight 0.1mm to 0.25mmPartly Open 0.25mm to 0.5mmOpen 0.5mm to to 2.5mmModerately Wide 2.5mm to 10mmWide 1cm to 10cmVery Wide 10cm to 100cmExtremely Wide >1.0m
TABLE 7: DESCRIPTORS FOR DISCONTINUITY INFILL
INFILL INFILL DESCRIPTION DEFINITIONClean No fracture infill materialStained Colouration on rock only. No recognisable infill materialFilled or partially filled Discontinuity filled with recognisable infill material which should be
described, eg clay, gypsum etc, together with its thickness.
Page 5 of 6 Issue 2.0
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Rocks_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:34 Page 5
APPENDIX 1: TERMINOLOGY USED IN THE DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF ROCKS
Page 6 of 6 Issue 2.0
References
01) BS EN ISO 14689-1: 2003: Geotechnical Investigation and Testing - Identification and Classification ofRock Part 1: Identification and Description.
02) BS 5930: 1999: Code of Practice for Site Investigation. British Standards Institution.
03) BS EN ISO 22475-1: 2006: Geotechnical Investigation and Testing - Sampling Methods and GroundwaterMeasurements - Part 1: Technical Principles for Execution.
Appendix 1 - Terminology Used in Rocks_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:34 Page 6
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
APPENDIX 1Explanatory Notes on Fieldwork, Loggingand Laboratory Testing
ASSESSMENT OF AGGRESSIVE GROUND AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
section title sheets x25.indd 5 14/03/2013 16:17
APPENDIX 1: ASSESSMENT OF AGGRESSIVE GROUND AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
Certain ground and groundwater conditions may be described as aggressive depending on their chemicalcomposition which is related to previous industrial use. Where foundations are proposed to be constructed onindustrial sites or on landfill sites in which the ground or groundwater may be contaminated with chemicalwaste, detailed consideration needs to be given to both the method of investigation and the severity of groundand groundwater conditions with respect to construction materials. For such sites it will usually be necessaryto undertake a full chemical analysis in order to identify the potentially aggressive compounds.
On sites where new concrete foundations are to be constructed in natural ground it is usually only necessaryto examine the sulfate content and pH level of the ground. The sulfate content of soils varies widely and canrange from being virtually absent to extremely high concentrations in crystals such as gypsum. In betweenthese two extremes sulfate may be disseminated throughout a soil or may be present in discrete bands orlenses. Because of this wide variation in the sulfate content of soils, the most reliable indication of possibleaggressive conditions can be obtained by testing representative samples of groundwater. In order to takeaccount of natural variations in the distribution of sulfates in the ground, samples should be taken at a numberof locations that are well spaced across the site and at different depths.
The methods for the determination of total sulfate of soil and the sulfate content of groundwater and 2:1aqueous soil extracts are given in various specifications including BS 1377 1990: Part 3: Section 5 (ref 01). Theresults of tests performed in accordance with BS 1377 yield results which are expressed as percentage of dryweight retained or grammes/litre SO3. Tests performed in accordance with other specifications however, tendto express results as SO4.
The classification of natural sulfate conditions is based on BRE Special Digest 1 2005 (ref 02). This digest makesmost use of sulfate values expressed as milligrammes/litre SO4. In order to convert the results expressed as SO3
(BS 1377) to SO4 (BRE Special Digest 1) it is necessary to apply a multiplication factor of 1.2. In the followingdiscussion of sulfate conditions values given in the tables are expressed in terms of SO4. The current approachto the classification of aggressive ground conditions given in BRE Special Digest 1 is based on the AggressiveChemical Environment for Concrete (ACEC). This takes into account the type of site, sulfate concentration andgroundwater acidity and mobility. Different site assessment procedures are used for natural ground, forbrownfield sites that contain industrial waste and pyritic ground. The reactions of sulfates in the presence ofother ions, notably carbonate and magnesium are also taken into account.
In general when the results of sulfate determinations are assessed, emphasis must be given to the sampleswhich fall in the higher classes. Therefore if eight out of ten samples are found to be non aggressive and fallwithin Class DS1 and the remainder fall within Class DS2 it will be necessary to adopt the precautionsappropriate to Class DS2 conditions for the whole site. The current digest differentiates between ‘naturalground locations’ and ‘brownfield locations’.
Table 1 on page 2 is reproduced from the digest and deals with natural ground locations.
Page 1 of 4 Issue 2.0
Appendix 1 - Assessment of Agressive_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:20 Page 1
APPENDIX 1: ASSESSMENT OF AGGRESSIVE GROUND AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
Page 2 of 4 Issue 2.0
TABLE 1: AGGRESSIVE CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT FOR CONCRETE (ACEC) CLASSIFICATION FOR NATURALGROUND LOCATIONS (a) (From BRE Special Digest 1)
SULFATE GROUNDWATERDESIGN SULFATE 2:1 WATER/SOIL GROUNDWATER TOTAL STATIC MOBILE ACECCLASS FOR EXTRACT (b) POTENTIAL WATER WATER CLASS FOR LOCATION SULFATE (c) LOCATION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7(SO4 mg/l) (SO4 mg/l) (SO4 %) (pH) (pH)
DS-1 <500 <400 <0.24 >2.5 AC-1s>5.5 (d) AC-1 (d)
2.5-5.5 AC-2z
DS-2 500-1500 400-1400 0.24-0.6 >3.5 AC-1s>5.5 AC-2
2.5-3.5 AC-2s2.5-5.5 AC-3z
DS-3 1600-3000 1500-3000 0.7-1.2 >3.5 AC-2s>5.5 AC-3
2.5-3.5 AC-3s2.5-5.5 AC-4
DS-4 3100-6000 3100-6000 1.3-2.4 >3.5 AC-3s>5.5 AC-4
2.5-3.5 AC-4s2.5-5.5 AC-5
DS-5 >6000 >6000 >2.4 >3.5 AC-4s2.5-3.5 >2.5 AC-5
NOTESa) Applies to locations on sites that comprise either undisturbed ground that is in its natural state or clean fill derived from such ground.b) The limits of Design Sulfate Classes based on 2:1 water/soil extracts have been lowered relative to previous digests.c) Applies only to locations where concrete will be exposed to sulphate ions (SO4) which may result from the oxidation of sulfides (eg pyrite) following grounddisturbance.d) For flowing water that is potentially aggressive to concrete owing to high purity or an aggressive carbon dioxide level greater than 15mg/l, increase theACEC Class to AC-2z.
Explanation of suffix symbols to ACEC ClassSuffix ‘s’ indicates that the water has been classified as staticConcrete placed in a ACEC Class that includes the suffix ‘z’ primarily have to resist acid conditions and may be made with any of the cements listed in TableD2 in the Digest.
Additional testing is required for those natural sites that contain pryrite. In particular it is essential to takeaccount of the total potential sulfate content which might result from oxidation following ground disturbance.On such sites it is necessary to determine total sulfate content (AS% S04), total sulfur (TS%S). The total potentialsulfate is then determined from TPS%SO4=3.0 x TS%S. Finally the amount of oxidisable sulfides (OS as %SO4) isdetermined by subtracting the acid soluble sulfates (AS%S04) from the total potential sulfate content: OS%SO4
= TPS%SO4 – AS%S04. It is important to note that this testing is in addition to and not instead of the standardsulfate determination testing.
Unless the site can be demonstrated to comprise natural ground, Table 2 for brownfield locations must be usedin all assessments for the design of concrete. It should be noted that the effects of the magnesium ion becomerelevant to concrete design for certain Design Sulfate Classes.
Appendix 1 - Assessment of Agressive_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:20 Page 2
APPENDIX 1: ASSESSMENT OF AGGRESSIVE GROUND AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
TABLE 2: AGGRESSIVE CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT FOR CONCRETE (ACEC) CLASSIFICATION FORBROWNFIELD LOCATIONS (a) (From BRE Special Digest 1)
SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM GROUNDWATERDESIGN 2:1 WATER/SOIL GROUNDWATER TOTAL STATIC MOBILE ACECSULFATE EXTRACT (b) POTENTIAL WATER WATER CLASS FORCLASS FOR SULFATE (c) LOCATIONLOCATION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9(SO4 mg/l) (Mg mg/l) (SO4 mg/l) (Mg mg/l) (SO4 %) (pH) (d) (pH) (d)
DS-1 <500 - <400 - <0.24 >2.5 AC-1s>6.5 (d) AC-15.5-6.5 AC-2z4.5-5.5 AC-3z2.5-4.5 AC-4z
DS-2 500-1500 - 400-1400 - 0.24-0.6 >5.5 AC-1s>6.5 AC-2
2.5-3.5 AC-2s5.5-6.5 AC-3z4.5-5.5 AC-4z2.5-4.5 AC-5z
DS-3 1600-3000 - 1500-3000 - 0.7-1.2 >5.5 AC-2s>6.5 AC-3
2.5-5.5 AC-3s5.5-6.5 AC-42.5-5.5 AC-5
DS-4 3100-6000 <1200 3100-6000 <1000 1.3-2.4 >5.5 AC-3s>6.5 AC-4
2.5-3.5 AC-4s2.5-6.5 AC-5
DS-4m 3100-6000 >1200 (e) 3100-6000 >1000 (e) 1.3-2.4 >5.5 AC-3s>6.5 AC-4m
2.5-5.5 AC-4ms2.5-6.5 AC-5m
DS-5 >6000 <1200 >6000 <1000 >2.4 >5.5 AC-4s2.5-3.5 >2.5 AC-5
DS-5m >6000 >1200 (e) >6000 >1000 (e) >2.4 >5.5 AC-4ms2.5-5.5 >2.5 AC-5m
NOTESa) Brownfield locations are those sites or parts of sites that might contain chemical residues produced by industrial processes.b) The limits of Design Sulfate Classes based on 2:1 water/soil extracts have been lowered relative to previous digests.c) Applies only to locations where concrete will be exposed to sulfate ions (SO4) which may result from the oxidation of sulfides (eg pyrite) following grounddisturbance.d) An additional account is taken of hydrochloric and nitric acids by adjustment to sulfate contente) The limit on water soluble magnesium does not apply to brackish groundwater (chloride content between 12000mg/l and 17000mg/l). This allows ‘m’ tobe omitted from the relevant ACEC classification. Sea water (chloride about 18000mg/l) and stronger brines are not covered by this table.
Explanation of suffix symbols to ACEC ClassSuffix ‘s’ indicates that the water has been classified as staticConcrete placed in ACEC Classes that include the suffix ‘z’ primarily have to resist acid conditions cements listed in Table D2 in the Digest.Suffix ‘m’ relates to the higher levels of magnesium in Design Sulfate Classes 4 and 5.
Page 3 of 4 Issue 2.0
Appendix 1 - Assessment of Agressive_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:20 Page 3
APPENDIX 1: ASSESSMENT OF AGGRESSIVE GROUND AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
Page 4 of 4 Issue 2.0
The pH value of groundwater provides a crude measure of the potential aggressiveness due to the presence oforganic acids. The standard procedure for measuring the acidity of soils and groundwater is the electrometricmethod using a pH meter and is described in BS 1377: 1990: Part 3: Section 5. The pH value of pure water is7.0 and the presence of acid substances will yield results with values less than 7. It should be noted howeverthat the pH of most natural waters depends mainly on the dissolved carbon dioxide content and therefore liesbetween pH values of 6.5 and 8.5. It is generally accepted that soils or groundwater with pH values in the range6 to 9 may be classified as near neutral. It should be noted that the pH value of soil and groundwater canchange with time and it is therefore necessary to carry out testing on fresh samples of soil or water.
The pH value of the soil or groundwater also needs to be taken into consideration when the recorded sulfatecontent is borderline between two classes or approaches the upper limit of a given class. In thesecircumstances both the pH value and the mobility of the groundwater needs to be assessed and where doubtexists, the sample should be placed in the more severe class of the sulfate classification. This general approachmay be justified on the grounds that the acids present will tend to break down the concrete surface andtherefore make it more susceptible to sulfate attack. This will be especially so if the sample contains largeamounts of sulfides since these can be converted to sulfuric acid.
Organic acids are often found in peaty or marshy soils in which the pH value is below 6.0. In such soils it willbe necessary to take specific precautions to protect any concrete which would be exposed to organic acids.The recommended precautionary measures outlined in Tomlinson 2001 (ref 03) could be followed. In all caseswhere mineral acids are present the groundwater is likely to be aggressive with regard to foundation concreteand in these circumstances the recommendations given in BRE Special Digest 1 Part C will need to be followed.
Apart from acid groundwater, the effects of static and mobile groundwater tables are taken into account in BRESpecial Digest 1 in ‘Box C9’ and the incremental rules in this table need to be viewed in relation to Tables C1and C2 in the Digest.
Alkaline groundwater is not generally considered aggressive to concrete unless present in high concentrations.Unless the aggregate used in foundation concrete is of a reactive type, pH values of groundwater up to pH =14 need not be considered as problematic.
References
01) BS 1377: 1990: Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes. Part 3: Chemical ElectrochemicalTests, British Standards Institution.
02) Building Research Establishment 2005: Concrete in Aggressive Ground. BRE Special Digest 1. BuildingResearch Station, Garston
03) Tomlinson M.J 2001: Foundation Design and Construction. 7th Edition, Pearson, Prentice Hall.
Appendix 1 - Assessment of Agressive_Norwest-ReportSectionA1 14/03/2013 15:20 Page 4
S U P P O R T I N G F A C T U A L D ATA
APPENDIX 2Calibration Certificates
SPT HAMMER CALIBRATIONS
section title sheets x25.indd 2 14/03/2013 16:17
ARCHWAY ENGINEERING (U .K) LTD
ARCHWAY ENGINEERING (UK LTD) AINLEYS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE ELLAND WEST YORKSHIRE HXS 9JP UNITED KINGDOM
Instrumented Rod Data
Diameter d r (mm):
Wall Thickness tr (mm):
54
6.0
Assumed Modulus Ea (GPa): 200
Accelerometer No.1: 7080
Accelerometer No.2: 7079
Force 150
100
z 50 .:.!
0
-50 I I 0 2 3 4 5 6
Time (ms)
Acceleration
10,000-
N 5,000
(,) Cl)
~ 0
-5,000
-10,000 0 2 3 4 5 6
Time (ms)
Calculations
Area of Rod A (mm2): 905
Theoretical Energy Etl,eor (J): 473
Measured Energy Emeas (J): 341
7
7
8
8
Energy Ratio Er {0/o): ~
9
9
10
10
SPT Hammer Energy Test Report in accordance with BSEN ISO 22476-3:2005
SPT Hammer Ref: AR358
Test Date: 27/06/2013
Report Date: 27/06/ 13
File Name: AR358.spt
Test Operator: MG
SPT Hammer Information
Hammer Mass m (kg): 63.5
Falling Height h (mm): 760
SPT String Length L (m): 13.0
Comments 1 Location CALIBRATION
Velocity
4
(,)
1! 2
E
0
0 2 3 4 5 6 Time (ms)
Displacement
0 -1 -2
E -3 E -4
-5
I I \ I I
___,\ I
~r- -~ I -
~~-- ~
7 8
--6 -7
~r 1
1- I I ~ I
9 10
-
I 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (ms)
~7FP ~~=NALD
Title: SALES ENGINEER
The recommended calibration interval is 12 months
SPTMAN ver.1.93 All rights reserved, Testconsult @2010
ARCHWAY ENG INEER ING (U .K ) LTD
ARCHWAY ENGINEERING (UK LTD) AINLEYSINDUSTRIALESTATE ELLAND WEST YORKSHIRE HXS 9JP UNITED KINGDOM
Instrumented Rod Data
Diameter d r (mm): 54
Wall Thickness tr (mm): 7.1
Assumed Modulus Ea (GPa) : 208
Accelerometer No.1: 7080
Accelerometer No.2: 7079
Force 200
150
A 100 z ..liC
50 ~ .A I' ~-V !'1 ~ AI "'
V 0
-50
h. --0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
15,000
N 10,000 u
~ 5,000
0
-5,000
-
lW\
Time (ms)
Acceleration
~ r'l. {\ {\ fJ\1"" V ~ '-'
' I
(\ r.A { \.N V \.
0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Time (ms)
Calculations
Area of Rod A (mm2): 1046
Theoretica l Energy l:u,eor (J) : 473
Measured Energy Emeas (J) : 397
Energy Ratio Er (0/o): ~
The recommended calibration interval is 12 months
SPT Hammer Energy Test Report in accordance with BSEN ISO 22476-3 :2005
SPT Hammer Ref: TDP6A
Test Date: 06/06/ 2013
Report Date:
File Name:
Test Operator:
06/06/ 2013
TDP6A.spt
KM
SPT Hammer Information. y'
Hammer Mass m (kg): 63.5
Falling Height h (mm): ·760
SPT String Length L (m) : 10.0
Comments I Location CALIBRATION CERT FOR SOIL ENGINEERING RIG TPD6A
3
2.5
2 u
1.5 Ql
.!!! E 1
0.5
0
-0.5 0
0 \
-2
Velocity
" """
1\. '\
1""- r r 11 V IV V
" ,,
r \ lA 1 I \j ...
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Time (ms)
Displace'!"ent
-. .......
' '"'-E E -4
-6
-8 ' 0
" > ""' ....---. I • ' I
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Tim·e (ms)
Signed: K.MCDONALD
Title: SALES ENGINEER
SPTMAN ver.l.93 All rights reserved, Testconsult @2010
www.soil-engineering.co.uk
Leeds
Head Office & Geotechnical Laboratory Parkside Lane, Dewsbury Road, Leeds LS11 5SX T: 0113 2711111E: [email protected]
Camberley
Southern OfficeFoundation Court, Riverside Way, Watchmoor Park, Camberley GU15 3RG T: 01276 674940 E: [email protected]
Motherwell
Scottish Office, Unit 22, Biggar Road Industrial Estate, Cleland, Motherwell ML1 5PBT: 01698 863 400 E: [email protected]
FS 272331265
Report Covers front back.indd 3 14/03/2013 13:04