renewable energy on public lands - nsaa journal
TRANSCRIPT
18 • NSAA Journal • December 2009/January 2010 w w w. n s a a . o r g
Renewable Energy and Public LandsTHE GREEN ROOM
With a new federal administration encouraging renewable energy development, expanding state and federal tax credits and grant programs, and a burgeoning clean energy industry, the time seems ripe for resorts looking to move past renewable energy credits to develop and showcase their own on-site renew-able energy projects. Yet, even in such a seemingly favorable climate, what are the realities of permitting and installing renewable energy projects that make financial and environmental sense?
T he question is particularly perti-
nent for the many U.S. resorts
located on or adjacent to federal
land. While the administration in its early
days has championed the development of
renewable energy projects on federal land,
the process remains far from straight-
forward. Yet a handful of projects in the
works are shedding important light on the
future prospects for ski resorts looking to
power their own future.
THE AGENCIES RESPONDTwo main federal land management agen-
cies are most relevant to ski resorts and
their renewable energy ambitions – the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
and, in particular, the U.S. Forest Service
(USFS). While the idea of renewable energy
on federal lands is not new, both have
recently been tasked to respond to calls for
expanded renewable energy development.
In June, the U.S. Senate Appropriations
Committee asked both agencies to develop
criteria for determining proper site loca-
tions of renewable energy projects on land
under their jurisdiction. In addition, Title
II of the 2005 Energy Policy Act guides the
Secretary of the Interior to develop 10,000
megawatts of non-hydropower renewable
energy on federal lands within 10 years.
Most recently, in early October, President
Obama issued an Executive Order directing
federal agencies to step up their commit-
News and Views from the Sustainable Front
• BY DAVE WORTMAN, PROGRAMMANAGER, BRENDLE GROUP
ment to sustainability – including the use
of renewable energy. Interior Secretary Ken
Salazar has responded in-kind with a series
of orders and announcements to bolster
renewable energy development.
In response, the BLM has been inun-
dated with applications for renewable
energy projects – as of mid-2009, the
agency had received proposals for more
than 450 projects. The surge in applica-
tions prompted the Department of the
Interior in March to create a special task
force to expedite the review and approval
of renewable energy projects on public
land and identify specific areas suitable
for solar, wind, geothermal, and biomass
projects. A Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement was also prepared under
the National Environmental Policy Act to
streamline environmental review of wind
projects. Finally in May, Secretary Salazar
announced four new permitting offices to
support permitting efforts. Still, the agency
remains significantly overstretched and
currently has a five-year backlog of appli-
cations. “Even with the additional staff, it’s
probably going to get worse before it gets
better,” says Nathanael Greene, director of
Renewable Energy Policy for the Natural
Resources Defense Council (NRDC).
Of more importance to ski resorts,
USFS, in contrast, is in its infancy in
dealing with proposals for significant
renewable energy development. While
small solar photovoltaic systems on roof-
tops, chairlifts, and other facilities are
common at ski resorts – and in 2005 the
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
assessed the potential for renewable
energy on national forests – to date there
have been no significant renewable energy
projects developed on national forests.
This has left ski resorts, many of which are
located on or adjacent to national forests,
largely playing a guessing game as to how
the agency will respond to future requests.
“While the U.S. Forest Service is
certainly receptive to wind and other
renewable energy projects, there’s currently
no agency policy guidance,” says Laurie
Jodziewicz, siting manager for the American
Wind Energy Association. “Until the agency
finalizes its directives, projects are going to
be handled on a case-by-case basis.”
The USFS currently evaluates big
renewable energy projects as “special
uses,” much like other commercial uses
of national forest land. The process
requires an initial screening of the project
to ensure the use is in the public interest
and compatible with other uses of national
forest land, followed by a formal applica-
tion, environmental review, and permit-
ting. Beyond this process, it’s largely left to
each ranger district on each national forest
as to how projects are evaluated.
“We’re really behind the eight ball
agency-wide,” says Jim Stark, winter
An Opportunity or Risk for Resorts?
w w w. n s a a . o r g December 2009/January 2010 • NSAA Journal • 19
sports administrator for the Aspen-Sopris
district in Colorado’s White River National
Forest. Stark, who has been working with
Aspen-Snowmass on the feasibility of a
proposed wind project, emphasizes the
need to lay out a cookbook for how to
handle these types of projects. Until such
a guide is developed, individual resorts are
left to work within the priorities of their
local ranger district and national forest.
Many eyes are cast on the proposed
Deerfield wind project on the Green
Mountain National Forest in southern
Vermont, the first proposed significant
renewable energy project on a national
forest. With a proposed 17 wind turbines
producing a combined output of about 35
megawatts of power, the project, which has
been in the works since 2004, has cleared
some initial hurdles that offer optimism for
such future projects on national forests. In
its screening of the project, Green Mountain
National Forest found it to be consistent
with its land and resource management
plan and an appropriate use of public land.
An Environmental Impact Statement for
the project is currently being finalized.
RESORTS LEADING THE WAYA small handful of resorts have pioneered
the development of significant on-site
renewable energy projects – though none
have yet to develop large-scale projects
on public land. In Massachusetts, Jiminy
Peak’s now well-known 1.5-megawatt
wind turbine is on private land, as are two
other wind projects: a recently installed
turbine at Bolton Valley Resort in Vermont
and a proposed turbine at Berkshire East
in Massachusetts. California’s Kirkwood
Mountain Resort is moving ahead with
plans to install 20 wind turbines to
generate more than 20 percent of its
commercial and residential demand.
While the USFS has shown a distinct
interest in the project, it has yet to move
through the permitting process.
Among the other resorts currently
working with federal agencies on a renew-
able energy project is Pennsylvania’s Blue
Mountain Ski Area. According to resort
President Barb Green, Blue Mountain has
been pursuing development of a wind
project for the last 12 months, facing chal-
lenges along the way. The Appalachian
National Scenic Trail runs across the top
of the mountain, and the resort is located
along a major flyway for migratory birds.
Green says the National Park Service, which
manages the trail, remains undecided in its
position on the wind turbine. But she says
Blue Mountain remains committed to seeing
the project succeed as a way to reduce the
resort’s carbon footprint by 40 percent.
“We have the opportunity to do some-
thing about the global warming issue,” says
Green. “I’m committed to see that happen.”
Meanwhile, Aspen Skiing Company
(ASC) made headlines last year with the
deployment of a new 147 kW solar photo-
voltaic array on property owned by a local
school in Carbondale, Colo., but it’s their
proposed wind project that’s caught the
eye of resorts looking for project oppor-
tunities on federal lands. Teamed up with
Leitner-Poma of America and the Aspen-
Sopris Ranger District of the White River
National Forest, ASC has installed a mete-
orological tower at Snowmass to explore
the potential for wind energy develop-
ment on the mountain. If data shows
wind conditions are favorable, ASC may
move ahead with the installation of three
turbines that would provide two-thirds of
the company’s power needs.
Stark says the project to date has
received community support across the
board, one key consideration to having the
USFS on board with the project. If ASC
decides to move ahead with the project,
Stark realizes he’ll be forging new ground
in reviewing a renewable energy project on
his district. Stark says he’s received several
calls from other ski resorts to seek advice
on working with the USFS on their own
on-site renewable energy projects.
Still, many questions remain about
the viability of the project. Even if the
wind resource is present, Rick Spear, pres-
ident of Leitner-Poma of America, says
other issues such as maintaining public
support and being able to get turbine
components up the mountain’s slopes
must be addressed. But, Stark adds, all
three parties are committed to seeing the
project succeed. “We’re all very serious
about this project.”
ADvICE FOR RESORTSWith so little precedent for ski resorts
looking to site projects on federal land,
should interested resorts move ahead with
their own projects? Early indications show
the USFS is willing to work with resorts to
support renewable energy, and others offer
words of encouragement to increase the
chance of success. NRDC’s Greene suggests
employing an integrated design team from
the outset so that all issues, from aesthetics
to wildlife, can be addressed proactively.
“Get good data and do front-end
scoping, both internally and externally,
with the community,” says USFS’s Stark,
who’s encouraged at the prospects of the
Snowmass project. “If we have the right
place, it’s definitely the right time and the
right atmosphere.”
Dave Wortman is a program manager
at Brendle Group (www.brendlegroup.
com), a Fort Collins, Colorado-based
engineering consulting firm focused on
sustainability and specializing in work
with the ski industry. n
Visit The Green Room online
nsaa.org