reliability coordination strategy analysis and recommendations board of directors meeting december...
TRANSCRIPT
Reliability Coordination Strategy Analysis and
Recommendations
Board of Director’s Meeting
December 6, 2007
Topics Proposed Board Motions Strategy Objectives WSM Integration WSM and RC Hosting Strategies Governance and Facility Options Budget Implications Termination of Funding Agreements
RC Strategy Proposed Motions
WECC Reliability Coordination Strategy Governance Motion Approve the proposed Charter of the
Reliability Coordination Committee (RCC) and request that the Chair of the Board of Directors provide recommendations for the members of the RCC as soon as practical.
WECC Reliability Coordination Strategy Facility Motion The two Reliability Coordination Center
facilities shall be leased and operated by the WECC and be separate and independent from any WECC member. The two Centers shall each include: RC Control Room Data center to house the Westwide System
Model and other operating tools Offices for RC support staff
WECC Reliability Coordination Strategy Facility Location Motion One of the two Reliability Centers will be
located in the Vancouver, Washington/Portland Oregon area. The second Center location will be located in the greater Denver, Colorado area.
WECC Reliability Coordination Strategy 2008 Budget Motion The WECC CEO is authorized to borrow
up to $6,000,000 to fund the Reliability Coordination Strategy during the 2008 Budget Year. Said funds will be borrowed incrementally on an as needed basis. The borrowed funds will be paid back during Budget Years 2009 and 2010 unless otherwise determined by the WECC Board of Directors.
WECC Reliability Coordination Strategy Termination of Funding Agreements The WECC CEO is authorized to provide
notice to the three current hosts of the WECC Reliability Coordination Centers that the Reliability Coordination funding agreements will be terminated. The date of termination shall be determined by the WECC CEO based on the implementation schedule of the WECC Reliability Coordination Strategy.
RC Strategy Objectives
Strategy Objectives WECC-Wide RC Function Comply With All NERC & WECC Criteria 2 Centers, 2 Teams, Geographically
Separated Center Redundancy (Mutual Backup)
Common Tools Common Training
Separation and Independence from any Host
Strategy Objectives Focus on Reliability, Not Enforcement RCs Report to the WECC Director of
Reliability Coordination Recommended Minimum Staffing
Configuration Shift Consists of Operator and Operating
Engineer at Each Center 2 Teams = 34 FTEs Total
RCSTF Objectives Provide Cost-Effective RC Tools and
Facilities without “Gold Plating” Create an RC Platform That Can Expand as
Necessary to Meet Future Requirements Establish a Flexible RC Culture Retain, Hire, and Train the Best Staff
Obtainable with Competitive Compensation Packages
RC Sites/Team Configuration
Number of RC Sites / Team Configuration Components Summary
1. 2 RC Sites, Geographically Separated
2. One RC Team per Site (17 FTEs)
3. Defined Minimum Staffing Level (34)
4. Each Team Responsible for a Specific Geographical Sub-Region but Both Can Monitor and Study the Entire Western Interconnection
VOTING CLASS YES NO ABSTAIN
TRANSMISSIONPROVIDERS 22 0 0
TRANSMISSIONCUSTOMERS 20 0 0
STATE andPROVINCIAL 2 0 0
TOTALS 44 0 0
OC Voting Record – Number of RC Sites/Team Configuration
Integration of WSM into the RC Strategy
Board RC Motions – WSM & Tools Merge the application tools proposed in
the West-wide System Model (WSM) and the operating tools defined in the Reliability Center Strategic Principles (RCSP).
Provide for the procurement of bids and recommendation of a vendor to provide the IT/communications infrastructure for support of the RC’s.
Status of Westwide System Model Host RCSTF Developed and Issued an RFP
for the WSM Host and RC Team Hosts in February 2007
Electronic Data Systems (EDS) Was the Winning Bidder for WSM Hosting WECC Board Directed RCSTF to Begin
Negotiations WECC and EDS Have Not Come to
Agreement on Specific Issues Legal, Technical, and Cost
WECC WSM Host Option In September 2007, RCSTF Requested
WECC Staff to Investigate Option of WECC Hosting WSM & RC Tools
Facilities Would Include: (2) Data Centers for WSM and RC Tools Offices for WSM and RC Tools Support Staff
WSM & Tools Support Staff The WSM is an Energy Management
System (EMS) WECC is Currently Authorized to Hire 3
EMS Positions Eric Whitley – EMS Manager Hired Sept ’07
WECC is Currently Proposing 14 Total EMS Staff if WECC Hosts and 12 EMS Staff if EDS Hosts
Office Facilities for the EMS Team will be Required
WSM NetApps Support Understanding Operational Reality Makes
Network Applications Relevant EMS Support Staff Need to Understand the
Product the Operators Require Operators Get a Better Understanding of
How the Applications Work and Receive Exceptional Training
Common EMS Tools Improve Situational Awareness for Both Centers
A Well Designed RC Control Center is Key to Fostering a Professional and Credible RC Role
RC & WSMHosting Scenarios
Hosting Scenarios as Presented to the OC in October 2007
Option WSM Host RC HostEMS Office
Host
1 WECC WECC WECC
2 WECCBPA + CAISO WECC
3 VendorBPA + CAISO WECC
New Information BPA’s Attorneys Have Liability Concerns
These Concerns Must Be Addressed Prior to BPA Becoming a Long Term RC Center Host
CAISO Has Reported That it Will Not Host Non-CAISO RC Employees
WAPA is Not Interested in Hosting an RC in the Future and is Currently Working with WECC to allow the RDRC to Vacate their Facilities as soon as Practical
Potential layout of RC Control Centers
Reliability Coordination Governance
RC Governance OptionsA. WECC Management Model
B. Contract Corporate Provider Governance Model
C. Host Organization Model
D. WECC RC Governance Committee Model (RCGC)
RC Strategy WECC Management Model
RC Function
RC Director
WECC MembershipF
undi
ng
Reliability Coordination
Subcommittee
Oversight
Man
agem
ent
Operating Committee
Ove
rsig
ht
WECC Board
WECC Management
Ove
rsig
htO
vers
ight
Ove
rsig
ht
Fun
ding
Ove
rsig
ht
RC Strategy Contract Corporate Provider Governance Model
Governance Board
RC Director
WECC Membership
Fun
ding
Ove
rsig
ht
WECC BoardF
undi
ng
Ove
rsig
ht
Contract
RC Function
Ove
rsig
ht
Fun
ding
Fun
ding
Man
agem
ent
Oversight OC/RCS
Responsibility for Sanctions
?
RC Strategy Host Organization Model
Host Management
RC Director
WECC Membership
Fun
ding
Ove
rsig
ht
WECC BoardF
undi
ng
Ove
rsig
ht
Contract
RC Function
Ove
rsig
ht
Fun
ding
Fun
ding
Man
agem
ent
Oversight OC/RCS
Responsibility for Sanctions
?
RC Strategy WECC Committee Governance Model
RC Function
RC Director
WECC Membership
Fun
ding
Reliability Coordination Governance Committee
Ove
rsig
ht
Man
agem
ent
WECC BoardF
undi
ng
Ove
rsig
ht
Fun
ding
Ove
rsig
ht
WECC Management Model Direct Management of RC Function by
WECC Management Combining WECC EMS Staff, WSM, and
RC Staff in Same Facility More Flexibility to React In Dynamic
Circumstances There are No Perfect Contracts
Corporate Provider Model “PNSC Model” Single Separate Corporation Provides RC
Services through Contract with WECC Contract Determines Obligation of All
Parties Governed by a Board of Directors Reliability Coordinators are Employees of
the Corporation
Corporate Provider Model Benefits Independence of RC Functions from
Compliance Monitoring Focus Entirely on Reliability Bridge Current Reliability Coordinators Board of Directors Experience and
Obligations to the Corporation Separate Funding – No Competition with
other Efforts or Budget Constraints
Corporate Provider Model Benefits Potential for Audit to be Led by WECC
Instead of NERC Smaller Organization More Flexible and
Employees Feel Ownership Option to Contract with a Host Site
Corporate Provider Model Cons
Need for Liability Protection Requires Contract Development Between
Entities Contract May Reduces Ability to Make
Quick Changes Smaller Staff – Less Assistance to Address
Short-Term Needs
Host Organization Model Host Provides Access to Knowledgeable
Staff and Engineering Expertise WECC Hosting Option is a Duplication of
Efforts with Communication Systems, Security and other Services Provided by the Host
Contractor Model would Allow the CMRC Operators to be CISO Employees.
Host Organization Model Large Organization Allows More
Opportunities for RC Employees
WECC Committee Governance Model
Places all RCs Under WECC Umbrella No Contract to Negotiate with
Independent Host Oversight and Management by
Independent Board Committee Reporting Directly to the Board
RC Governance Motion Approve the Reliability Coordination
Governance Committee (RCGC) Concept that Included the Following Principles:
Devoted to Reliability and Management of the Reliability Coordination Function of the Western Interconnection
The RCGC Includes Highly Technical Experts In System Operations.
The RCGC Has A Fiduciary Responsibility For the Effective Operation of the RCS.
RC Governance Motion Includes the Duties of Loyalty and Care for
the RC Function Independence and Separation From Other
WECC Functions All Decisions Made By the RCGC and The
RCs Would Be Transparent Except for Those Requiring Confidentiality Such As: Personnel Actions, Legal And Critical Infrastructure Issues
All RC Staff Would Be WECC Employees
OC Vote – RC GovernanceVOTING CLASS YES NO ABSTAIN
TRANSMISSIONPROVIDERS
13 11 0
TRANSMISSIONCUSTOMERS
11 5 1
STATE andPROVINCIAL
1 0 1
TOTALS 25 16 2
Minority Opinions The language “All RC staff would be
WECC employees” was not stricken Would like to have voted on the Option 2
which is the complete independent corporation instead of this option
Do not understand how the Board is responsible to regulate [mandatory compliance] and at the same time will separate the RC function
Minority Opinions If the Board goes forward with this option
all RC staff will be forced to be WECC employees which could lead to losing the current RC operators
With this governance model WECC’s ability to recruit RC operators maybe reduced
Board RC StrategyGovernance Motion
WECC Reliability Coordination Strategy Governance Motion Approve the GNC’s proposed
Charter of the Reliability Coordination Committee (RCC) and request that the Chair of the Board of Directors provide recommendations for the members of the RCC as soon as practical.
RC Facility Options
RC Facility Options
A. Vendor Turn-Key Facility
B. Existing Hosts (BPA and CAISO)
C. WECC-Leased and Operated Facility
Vendor Turn Key Option Pros:
Fewer WECC Resources Vendor Takes Responsibility for Locating
Facility and Completing Installation Cons:
Cost Contract Development Timing
Existing Host Option Assumption:
Rules Of Conduct Prevent Discriminatory Influence Over A Reliability Coordinators
Pros: Informal (Non-decisional) Interaction Increases Grid
Awareness Large Grid Operator Host Has Extensive And
Unique Technical Expertise in Grid Operation Increased Hedge Against Risk Of Major Power
System Disturbances Cons:
Concern With Potential Conflict Of Interest. Potential Increased Host Liability
Existing Host Option Advantage of large grid operator
environment, infrastructure and expertise. Direct participation in RC decisions and
responses would be highly restricted. Generic discussions with host on all
general issues of grid reliability and characteristics encouraged.
Provides additional layer of infrastructure backup and expertise in unanticipated emergency situations.
WECC Host Facility: Pros Physical Independence from Utility Host RC1: 7,500 SF Facility for Data Center,
RC, & EMS Office RC2: 6,000 SF Facility for Data Center &
RC State of the Art Control Room Large Conference Room for Staff,
Committee, Task Force, & Work Group Meetings
WECC Host Facility: Pros Room for Expansion Attractive Locations with Freeway and
Airport Access Data Center and Control Room
Construction would be Contracted Out to Expert Vendors
WECC Host Facility: Cons Expertise Required in Managing a Data
Center
RC Facility Option Motion To Approve the Option Where the Two
RC Host Sites Would be WECC Operated
OC Vote – RC Facility OptionVOTING CLASS YES NO ABSTAIN
TRANSMISSIONPROVIDERS
14 5 3
TRANSMISSIONCUSTOMERS
13 0 2
STATE andPROVINCIAL
2 0 0
TOTALS 29 5 5
Minority Opinions RC Staff Retention Concerns Option Does Not Leave an Option for a
Large Grid Operator to Host the RC Centers
Board RC StrategyFacility Motion
WECC Reliability Coordination Strategy Facility Motion The Two Reliability Coordination Center
facilities shall be leased and operated by the WECC and be separate and independent from any WECC member. The two centers shall each include: RC Control Room Data center to house the Westwide System
Model and other operating tools Offices for RC support staff
RC Facility Locations
RC Facility Location Motion The WECC Operating Committee Directs The
Reliability Coordination Strategy Task Force To Identify the Best RC Facility Locations These Location Choices Will Be Based On:
Retention Of Employees Availability Of A Skilled Labor Pool Geographic Separation Cost Quality Of Life Easy Access
OC Vote – RC Facility LocationVOTING CLASS YES NO ABSTAIN
TRANSMISSIONPROVIDERS
21 0 0
TRANSMISSIONCUSTOMERS
12 0 0
STATE andPROVINCIAL
2 0 0
TOTALS 35 0 0
RCSTF Selection - Facility Location The Majority of the RCSTF Selected:
Vancouver, Washington Loveland, Colorado
An In Depth Analysis Was Not Performed Decision was Primarily Determined Based
on Staff Retention, Costs, and Availability of Candidates
Board RC StrategyFacility Location Motion
WECC Reliability Coordination Strategy Facility Location Motion One of the two Reliability Centers will be
located in the Vancouver, Washington/Portland Oregon area. The second Center location will be located in the greater Denver, Colorado area.
2008 WECC Budget Implications
WECC Operated Facility Option Saves $11M over 5 Year Period Versus
EDS WSM Host Option WECC Option Represents a Front
Loaded Capital Investment $5.9M Over 2008 RC Budget
EDS Option Cost Can Be Spread Easier to Meet WECC Budget Constraints
RC Strategy Cost Comparison - Summary - All In
Description 2008 2009Total 2008-2012
Initial Board Proposal - July 2006 $13,389 $11,800 $60,601
Current Approved 2008 Budget (2009-12 Estimates) $12,155 $16,571 $64,700
Projected Estimate - WECC Option - November 2007 $18,008 $13,975 $62,227
Projected Estimate - EDS WSM Host - November 2007 $20,694 $16,051 $73,525
In Thousands $
WECC Budget Impact – All In ($1,000)
Description 2008
Projected Estimate WECC Option $18,008
Current Approved RC Budget $12,155
Current Approved Statutory WECC Budget $26,819
Cost Increase to Membership $5,853
% Increase to Statutory Budget 22%
48%
-16% -15% -16% -17%
-4%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
% Differential WECC Option Over Current Budget Projections
Description 2008 2009 2010Total
2008-2012
Westwide System Model - Areva $1,639 $100 $104 $2,051
Infrastructure - Data Center and RC Tools, EMS Office and EMS salaries $4,740 $3,058 $2,578 $15,535
Staffing - travel, training, total RC staffing $7,845 $6,103 $6,103 $32,261
Transition - relocation, retention, overlapping $0 $3,417 $0 $3,417
RC Site - control room $3,783 $1,294 $1,294 $8,962
Total $18,007 $13,974 $10,081 $62,226
RC Budget Costs by Category($1,000s)
0%
3%
14%
-16% -17%
-3%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
% Differential WECC Option Over Current Budget Projections
RC Budget 2008 Financing Option
Board RC StrategyFacility Motion
WECC Reliability Coordination Strategy 2008 Budget Motion The WECC CEO is authorized to borrow
up to $6,000,000 to fund the Reliability Coordination Strategy during the 2008 Budget Year. Said funds will be borrowed incrementally on an as needed basis. The borrowed funds will be paid back during Budget Years 2009 and 2010 unless otherwise determined by the WECC Board of Directors.
Board RC StrategyTermination of
Funding Agreements
WECC Reliability Coordination Strategy Termination of Funding Agreements The WECC CEO is authorized to provide
notice to the three current hosts of the WECC Reliability Coordination Centers that the Reliability Coordination funding agreements will be terminated. The date of termination shall be determined by the WECC CEO based on the implementation schedule of the WECC Reliability Coordination Strategy.