reliability by design prepared by marina gvozdeva, elena onoprienko, yulia polshina, nadezhda...

22
RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Upload: lorena-smith

Post on 11-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

RELIABILITY BY DESIGNPrepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Page 2: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Outline

• Factors affecting reliability• Ways to increase reliability• Classroom test reliability• Tips for classroom tests

Page 3: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Two Components of Test Reliability

Candidates’ PerformanceReliability of the scoring

Ways to increase reliability

Page 4: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Factors affecting reliability:

• test factors;• administrative factors;• affective factors.

(Coombe et al., 2007:xxiii)

Page 5: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

• fluctuations in the learner;• fluctuations in scoring;• fluctuations in test administration.

(Coombe et al. 2010)

Factors affecting reliability:

Page 6: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Reliability vs validity

E.g. 100 MCQ translation items: may be reliable, but will not be valid as a writing

test.

Increasing reliability contributes to validity: an unreliable test cannot be valid.

Page 7: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Reliable, not valid Not reliable, not valid

Reliable and valid

Reliability vs validity

Page 8: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Ways to increase reliability

Get enough samples of behaviour:• the more items there are in a test, the more

reliable it is;• additional items should be independent of

each other and of existing items;• a test should be neither too long nor too

short.

Page 9: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

• do not allow test takers too much choice;• write clear items with simple instructions;• include items with a range of difficulty;• ensure that test materials are easy to read

and have a clear layout;• make sure test takers know what to expect

in the test.(Hughes, 1989:39)

Ways to increase reliability:

Page 10: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Compare four tasks

a) Write about tourism.b) Write a composition on tourism in this country.c) Write a composition on how we might develop the tourist

industry in this country.d) Discuss the following measures intended to increase the

number of foreign tourists coming to this country:i. more/better advertising and/or information (where? what

form should it take?);ii. improve facilities (hotels, transportation, communication

etc.);iii. training of personnel (guides, hotel managers etc.).

(Hughes, 1989:38)

Page 11: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Ambiguous items

Complete the sentences using the words and word combinations from Essential Vocabulary:

1. He has been promoted three times this year. No doubt he is … 2. Yes, that party was a disaster but it was not me who organized it, so

you …3. I am thinking of buying this laptop but I am not sure if I can afford it.

Could you …4. I think politics is really boring – it ….5. The movie was very touching but I managed to … II. Name: 6. three types of waste;7. three ways to dispose of garbage.

Page 12: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Scoring reliably:

• use items that permit scoring which is as objective as possible;

• make comparisons between candidates as direct as possible;

• provide a detailed scoring key;• train scorers.

Page 13: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Reliability for speaking assessment:

• designing the rating process – rating scale;• reporting scores and giving feedback –

setting cut scores;• assuring intrarater / interrater reliability.

Page 14: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Reliability for classroom speaking assessment

Intrarater / interrater reliability – training raters:

• understanding criteria for assessment;• agreement with other raters;• consistency of performance.

Page 15: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Reliability of teacher made tests:

• increasing number of items increases reliability;

• moderate difficulty level increases reliability;• having items measuring similar content

increases reliability.

Page 16: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Tips for writing short answer/completion items

There should be only one short,concise answer.

Allow for partial credit.

(Coombe C. et al, 2010:30-45)

Page 17: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Tips for cloze/gap-fill items:

• ensure that answers are concise;• provide enough context;• develop and allow for a list of acceptable

responses;• don’t put a gap in the first sentence of a

paragraph or text. (Coombe C. et al, 2010:34)

Page 18: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Tips for true/false questions:

• write items that test meaning rather than trivial detail;

• questions should be written at a lower level of language difficulty than the text;

• consider the effects of background knowledge;

• questions should appear in the same order as the answers appear in the text.

(Coombe C. et al., 2010:30)

Page 19: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

• make sure you paraphrase questions in simple clear language;

• avoid ‘absoluteness’ clues;• add another option where plausible to

decrease the guessing factor. (Coombe C. et al., 2010:30)

Tips for true/false questions:

Page 20: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Tips for writing matching items:

• give more options than premises;• number the premises and letter the options;• make options shorter than premises;• avoid widows;• make it clear to test takers if they can use

options more than once. Coombe C. et al., 2010:33

Page 21: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

Tips for writing good MCQ:

• write MCQ that test only one concept;• provide as much context as possible;• keep sensitivity and fairness issues in mind;• standardize the number of response options;• one response option should be an

unambiguous correct or best answer.(Coombe C. et al, 2010:25-7)

Page 22: RELIABILITY BY DESIGN Prepared by Marina Gvozdeva, Elena Onoprienko, Yulia Polshina, Nadezhda Shablikova

• all response options should be similar in length and level of difficulty;

• avoid writing absurd or giveaway distracters;• avoid extraneous clues;• make the stem positive.

(Coombe C. et al, 2010:25-7)

Tips for writing good MCQ: