regular meeting of council - 07 feb 2017

VISION

"Making Opportunities Happen"

MISSION

"Working Together, Building a Better Community"

'Our Vision and Mission will serve as a guide in our decision making'

Regular Meeting of Council

February 7, 2017 at 7 PM in Council Chambers

Agenda

Page

1 Adoption of Agenda

2 Public Hearings a) Public Hearing 1: Bylaw #29-2016 b) Public Hearing 2: Bylaw #01-2017

3 Delegations 3 - 5 a) Slave Lake Midget Thunder - Aaron Froment 6 b) William Driedger - Big Fish Bay

4 Minutes of Previous Meetings 7 - 12 a) Regular Meeting of Council Minutes - January 24, 2017

5 Business Arising

6 CAO Update

7 Question Period

8 Reports and New Business

of 140

Regular Meeting of Council

Tuesday February 7, 2017 at 7:00 PM

13 - 16 a) Community Services Project Status Report - Ruth Rolfe, Director of Community

Services and Derek Starnes, Manager of Facilities and Parks 17 - 20 b) Residential Garbage Collection - Calvin Couturier, Acting Director of Operations 21 - 84 c) Bylaw #29-2016, Off - Site Levy Bylaw - Laurie Skrynyk, Director of Planning and

Development 85 - 94 d) Bylaw #01-2017 Regulatory amendment to LUB 22-2007 - Laurie Skrynyk, Director

of Planning and Development 95 - 105 e) Bylaw #03-2017 Regulatory amendment to LUB 22-2007 - Laurie Skrynyk, Director

of Planning and Development 106 - 120 f) Bylaw #04-2017 Redistricting amendment to LUB 22-2007 - Laurie Skrynyk,

Director of Planning and Development 121 - 127 g) Bylaw #05-2017 Redistricting amendment to LUB 22-2007 - Laurie Skrynyk,

Director of Planning and Development

9 Mayor's Corner

10 Correspondence 128 a) High Prairie School Division - Safety Initiatives - Thank you letter 129 b) CAODC - Request to Observe Oil and Gas Day February 13, 2017 in municipality. 130 - 140 c) ATCO Electric - Town of Slave Lake Lights - additional Information

11 Adjournment

of 140

TOWN OF

-SLAVE LAKEDelegations to Council

Name of Delegate(s):

Representing:

Contact Phone Number:

Contact Email:

cj0i1a jore

Topic: r1rL Co- f\,r.,

tOV(flcxi_______

Information to Shareor Concerns: 1i” 15 ,

Person in Administration familiar with this Topic: L’.. RDecision Requested: yC)in t hF_ lN

Attached Information for Councilors’ to review:

Notes:

M R(

Limit presentation to 10 (ten) minutes.

Signed by Delegate: c—

Date: U

All notifications and documentation must be sent and received by email: lisa.russeIlslaveIake.caIf you have Materials/Documentation to be included in the Agenda, they must be received by4:30 pm on the Wednesday before you are scheduled to appear before Council.*Any documentation submitted (including this Delegate Application) is considered “Public Information”and will appear in a Council Agenda*

FOR OFFICE USE ONLYDate and Time of Council Meeting to attend: ‘- 2 \Approved to Present by: rrcQ Date: NcR H IflDale and Time Delegate was notified of Council Meeting/Time, they are to attend: L (5

WORKING TOGETHER BUILDING A BETTER COMMUNITY” —P.O. BOX 1030, 10- MAIN STREET LW. SM VELAKE. ALBERTA TOG 2AØJ \, [\ / 7 /17PHONE (780) 649-8000 FAX (760) 849-2633 -

ai Fn?lr

f*f5 ‘Lovc la.jZe. I1iIy-! [kvcit,

7 Y’.C 7

O\LCifl’.nr ‘CL k’fl1,,i ,ç.”fl

Slave Lake Midget Thunder - Aaron Froment of 140

I’t’i’iiijt C tsii(i’;icl

loin’)’ C,iiilr,ii

11)1) ii) Ii vi’huh, t:,,l,iFlI,,iF lv

I,.I ..k.- A))

111.911

(FFFII)I.IF 11/ I.) 1SF’

I FbI’ h’i,ii’r Ply

I .151, /VF

1110)131)

A FF1011

ILC I ciU 2

Pirnill 114043, ApprovedF IF, I1l ‘.1

___

TOWN OF

IFl’i.yIl%.F5

— Ill ‘‘F 101/F Ill

,.r ,‘PltT0F’

I IF’ Cl,. I0I•’, IF

1,10)1) SD‘II’l iii’’.I• ii

$11 04,01

(:lr’’,’-’. Tate’. D,scn)i’il’,41120 II) S’[F4 OFF

I.Fypi ‘(FIIIlI!IJlI

Al IF’ji[r ‘I)Iy ,ij[)

Dy. Ri jill ‘‘il

[‘Fly Dii’

1,’:.rrtiii.,,

Iii i’”Ti’’’. filial Payrii,’ii’.’

SF)

II AuF F/V

Slave I ike All I IF) ‘/04(‘/11)1) FrIll F’41’Fll

0,”

Eu,iiii

11111 ‘.‘ I. Ill

F i IFI.iy

IF . Ill hF F. ly

F. 41 III. iv

I’tn ‘Ii, iy

0111FF. ly

IF/ill End,

f.’[,F 2:1:’ Fl? 4 III FF101 F, I Fillip. I1FIFFIFI1IIC [,l,FF 22 :11) / ID 16 PMv/iF) ‘4 121? III 111AM F, FF1111:, M.:r)4 Fl)) / 4 111PMM.ulO ,,) lily.: Il FF1.1. I’lL,,).’ p ‘jo II ‘‘‘‘FF5;5102’):’ II] II’ II AM II IFFFF,F I) ‘F 29 .

)‘

F 3(1 “5OPi F ,‘lFP/ F. 4FF PM 2 1111111’, 1FF Fill FIIFIF . 1511 25/F ill IF 11, I’M1.1.’ 20 21117 Ii 00/051 45 FF115411 1111111/0’’ M.y 20 2FF)? 12 4’’ I’M155FF 20 ‘FF17 a 111151 ),FFF,F.. MI :F. 2111? I ‘‘‘IF I’M

SlIlllFl1iIyF

‘111.1 I’J’::’’..’’ III’:) 7I (11,11 I 1111FF ii) hIll IS

:11).

1VI1FIFFI’F C,’))) 011FF i:il IFFIFIIFII Pill Ill

VP.’ YiiilF: FIIFIF:FIIFFI

All F’FIF NFJM iF)FF

Day

I—i ill

F ‘F id,

S.FIIFI’ F. 91

IF . 1)1. 91

[).Iys N III. I

M. ir ‘4 :11117

N..’ .4 .1)11 F

N ii 25I/H2IF.,iFl7

EventBegins

111111 A’’!

44’F’V

1011FF 11151

64’,P’iI

I olal N ,,,FFIIF:rF If 1:111’’: 4Tots I liv 9 SOIlS

AI,.FIFF 2 V.1 IF’i.

3056Av,F SWSlave I ,iSF A’ F (IF) i ‘/04

DUF ,iIiFFn

2Irc.,. S 5cr, lIlIes l.A i 24. 20 71 Slut::’. ) S rI lea 101 u 24, 23772Flo,Frs l5ru’’’- NFl 25 20122 flours 5 ifln:Fifes M:ip 2

Rosour.:i’ Coniter

ala 1FF:,.0. ‘‘. ‘.: ‘(IF

335!’’’tuSlave Lake AG 711021341780, 849.81140

EvIlilBegins

Date

Event

yjo VIFFIFF I runch,,:p

N 111FF’,

Time

12 F,’ •FM

7 1,0 MV

15CM

1.F.V

Notes

Notes

TinieDay

E.v” it Ends

Date

Event EndsDale

Days RegrIlsIed

v.2321.’’ 070/’’? lL:’. ‘u :2.12/0.1 IF 1100PMMap 24 207 900 AM 74 hours Me, 24, 2077 1100 F’MMo 25. 21,17 900131 14 i’.FFiI CleF 25, 2017 1:00 F’M

lit Int’//inn rnrlnr.i orl; up mm /tnua in nfc I Inn’ Ii, p/cnnyl pt/Porn, t flpt,, I ct’l Nt’ —sAl Al kr nip’, luhFinri 1 /1L:/-i


I’erinu ( oiilnicPage? nI 2

II UI) 1111111I Ill I’M

Stirniniry1111,11 r liii-il,,’J [I 11.111’-,’

I, ‘tIliti,. :.l

— I II’ l\

C’nhi’r Ml..7,1 ‘‘I’ll)) I’ll.v117,, II IllIllIllIllil I Illilly ll:II!:iI y’ lb lw IiiIIPU1AvI18WAll .7) ‘Ily ‘‘(Ill

.11.1W LIkIl All 1(11; :‘A4780) 0,111 8(1411

0.17% RP1111.I’,II,IP

(iF [Illilli.Ill

IllLIl’Lll y 7l,ii ‘I 71111’ 1lnUAr,I 141 lillirs $.1v23 .1-I,lS llonr’y4I Jill ‘V Ii, 1’) ‘III? LI III) ,Ij 4 111111’ 17-,, .81. ,•ll 7 t I Ill] Old

Ill I, I dl’ I-I Mi 2:, .1:17 I ilI 111171.1)1, ‘ii) AI1 It 1,11.11 0 ‘20.’’,) 7 ii 1511-lIllillI-Iry

lii I

P I all, .‘‘ a

Ill 7’)

I vyiilCIII’ V111111.1.1 I’JllV,rII,, I I IILIIFI ii lll•l ii 1111111 )‘LIII.li I- 14,,i,l,r 1,11111’ I I, I ‘—,llri’

—.VI.- 9,01lIllill

All, ‘.‘)‘ILl’, ‘IISJ.iv,’ I aki, All 11)1 • ‘7417801041111041)

Eve.iI0 1

- I-v—Ill Ends1174111’

‘II ‘.1III hint,111111 l.ty 1111 .1 ‘III? ‘lll)li’lft.l I’ll sill,’. Nq,1122,,i II? II00PIsI 1111.17 II .124:111? 91111 All 1411,1111’. lii-’ 74 11117 00 PM‘‘iLiJIII V .1.1211 ,IJI. 1,14171 1411, ‘r--i IF7,1111,117 M. .. ‘III ‘‘1111AM 4 l’’iu M.l120 .1)17 IICC’M

I ill,,) Nrj,nI,.1111,11 hilly 9011,41,’,

W l,IIAI’C,l I

III -i,p-t’’tiiUnIt Ftye UnIts lax

‘11111111 8’ A IIFl .lIllnl,,IW,IlI.-r k-I iii,], I (l’’FVj’’’ilOJ ‘‘In ,‘‘‘l--l:J’iIl’t ‘:71%,- 7:-i 071 N’, :1:1,1All’Fl.l

Vt-ill II’’’ 74 i.li(i’l 1; I’l,lVIlIU,ll 11111111.1 liii” it 1141)41 7:-I LIII) (III III)) 1,171 1741:’ 51,2 III 51.100 IIIAyFI,l I11111 -‘‘II ‘57111,1 11 ‘ii,;.’II . I’IIJV,Il-, -il I 1111111 Illll’iI I #4111: 57)1111111 00 ‘id: 5952 5:111,15’All I

911111)1 I’ll All-U:) I II 111.1! (‘‘‘11111 M;l,y I C PlIlVirl, ‘‘I 11,1,111,111)1111 #411’F 1 $77 1:-lI 9811 051118, $32 Dl) $09300All 11,12

‘I’.’ III Lii i’..cI:i’,’ I,(ll- IR,,I.iili.,’ oI S/il Cii,

Oiw P-il,’Alliol,,? Paid WlIIlIInawaI AdjusliTrIll Balance

l .10.11)8$ $410330

‘‘Ft 3a’.l’lte $4,303 00

0-1:181-7- -

II,, 1,1,1,11111(11,111 - III. 17,11 ((11111 Ii- IlY’”’’ Jill1

- CUSIOM QU[.SUONS

Qilt’sl.onAnswertVl,w,:lIiyl.’ Ill

Please Specify ally special ‘ielLp Or equiprilenl rl’LI) Jl’Nl - 7(111 may nv.’

li/A

httns://annrodca.active.cnm/tnwnnfisIavelake/servIet/PcrrnitDeini!.s1i?iH-’41 41&ni’w win’! 1/1 t/1(ul 7


Name of Delegate(s):

TOWN OF

SLAVE LAKEDelegations to Council

jC

Representing:

Contact Phone Number

Contact Email:

\D. t. \ ‘1Z\A \_‘Th\ 1

(J

Information to Shareor Concerns:

ft

Person in Administration familiar with this Topic:

Decision Requested:

Signed by Delegate:

rAll notifications and documentation must be sent and received by email: lisasusseIIisiaveIake.caIf you have MateñalslDocumentation to be included in the Agenda, they must be received by4:30 pm on the Wednesday before you are scheduled to appear before Council.*My documentation submitted (Including this Delegate Application) Is considered “Pubiic information”and will appear In a Council Agenda*

FOR OFFICE USE ONLYDateandrimeofCouncilMeetingtoattend: -e\’- ,7 LIN

__________________________

Date: c-\Date and Time Delegate was notified of Council Meeting/Time, they are to attend:

WORKING TOGETHER, BIJIWING A BETTER COMMUNIIVP.0 BOX 1030, 10— MAIN STREE S. W, SLAVE MICE, ALBERTA TOG 240PHONE (780) 849-8000 FAX (780) 849-2633

fY \\ C&(YN

Topic: (CQflTh (Th c,Th\

Attached Information for Councilors’ to review:

-

Notes: Limit presentation to 10 (ten) minutes.

Date:

4\L.

(

a ‘cQ/

N\, ç)k.-nj

)flTh3

Approved to Present by:

William Driedger - Big Fish Bay of 140

MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCILCOUNCIL CHAMBERS

January 24, 2017 at 7:00 p.m.

Council Present: MayorTyler Warman, Councillors: Mark Missal, Joy McGregoriulie Brandle, Darin Busk and PhilipLokken

Staff Present: Brian Vance, CAO - Laurie Skrynyk, Director of Planning and Development — Doug Baird, ProjectManager and Lisa Russell, Recording Secretary

Others Present: MediaResidentsDelegation

Mayor Warman called meeting to order at 7:00 pm

Agenda:

Motion #023-17 Moved by Councillor Lokken

That Council accept the January 24, 2017 agenda as presented

CARRIED

Delegation: Murray Broadhead

Discussion Notes:

• There remains a 13 acre section that levies were not paid on.• Proposal: to give amount of land to Town equal to levies owing.• Appraisal can be done by mutually agreed upon appraiser.• Road on North side has a right of way — would need to be accessible if considered.

Mayor Warman: We would like to work with industry and businesses and look at creative options. Wewant to ensure that we look for options and at the same time take the options that workbest for the town and the residents as a whole.

We will have administration look into the various options and we will be in touch withyou. Thank you for coming out to speak with us.

Motion #024-17: Moved by Councillor Busk

Council tasks administration to evaluate options for Mr. Broadhead’s payment of off-site levieson property located on Lot 4, Block 1 Plan 0823419, and bring a report back to Council.

CARRIED

Page 1 of 6Regular Meeting of Council Minutes - January 24, 2017 of 140


January 24, 2017 at 7:00 p.m.

Minutes of Previous Meetings:

Minutes of Regular Meeting of Council January 10, 2017

Motion_t025-17: Moved by Councillor Brandle

That the minutes of January 10, 2017 Regular Meeting of Council be accepted as presented.

CARRIED

Minutes of Committee of the Whole Meeting of Council January 17, 2017

Motion U026-17: Moved by Councillor Brandle

That the minutes of January 17, 2017 Committee of the Whole Meeting of Council be acceptedas presented.

CARRIED

CAO Update (Presented by CAO Brian Vance)Administration:

• The renovations on the Emergency Services Station are progressing. Calls are being dispatched from it.• Proposals for curbside garbage and recycle pickup were opened on the 201h A report will come to Council on

February 7.

Finance:

• David Joy has resigned so we are in the process of hiring another Finance Director.Projects:

• Lift Station E: About 3 containment rings have been placed with the remainder expected over the next week.• Raw water line: The consultation process continues. Alberta Environment is waiting for this to be completed

before issuing their approval.

Operations:

• Ongoing cleanup of snow and grading continues on priority 1,2, and 3 roads.• The sewage treatment system aeration system has frozen up. Crews are getting these operational again.

Planning:

• Reviewing development processes and bylaw revisions.• Preparing the annual letter to Real Estate Agents and Lawyers regarding off site levies.

Community Services:Parks and Facilities

• Started sanding on trails and sidewalks that are on hilly areas. Are checking out the sander to see if it can beresurrected. The walkway on the highway 88 bridge is being cleared.

Page 2 of SRegular Meeting of Council Minutes - January 24, 2017 of 140


January 24, 2017 at 7:00 p.m.

Parent Link• Pre Natal class last Saturday had poor attendance, hoping for better for their next session• Had an Early Childhood Development Coalition meeting on Monday, looking into speakers for the lunch and

learn and trying to determine what the target audience will be.FCSS

• Had an Anger Ed meeting this week. New sessions will be starting next week. Registration is still coming in.Seniors

• Have been busy with the icy conditions and cleaning up after the wind storm• Meeting with Vanderwell Lodge about Meals on Wheels.

Pool• Jumpstart application was accepted.• Pool Supervisor and Programmer are taking a Fentanyl Antidote training session.

Programs• Frost Fest donations are starting to come in• The lanes on the track of the MRC have now been switched, walking is on the inside and running is now on the

outside• Starting to plan for a year round Canada 150 theme. Have come up with an idea to have a large photo frame

that is moved around the community and region. Will keep updating as the idea develops• We added a Home Alone course on February 411’ as our others are full

Internal• January 28h1 Home Alone• February 41h

— Home Alone• February ll2O°’ Frost Fest (Programs)• Feb ll’ — Prenatal Class — Parent link

External

• Jan 27th — 291h— Minor Soccer Tournament in the Field House

• February 1V”— Farmers Market in Lobby and Indoor Family Carnival in the Field House• March 111h

— Farmers Market in Lobby and Skating Carnival on Arena 1• March 24-26 - Midget Playoffs• March 31’ — April 211(1

— Atco Tournament on both arenas• May 5,6 - Chamber Tradeshow

• June3O-Grad

Question Period:

• Councillor McGregor: Can we put signs up in the school zones posting the School Zone times and speed? Is thatwithin our rights and responsibilities?Mayor Warman: yes please look into that and bring the information back to CouncilCAO: Yes, I will do that.

• Councillor Busk: I have been approached and heard of others that have been, asking for directions to the MRC. Iwould like to see directional signage.CAD: I will look into the Canada 150 grant definitions for signage to see if that could be done through that and Iwill report back to Council.

• Councillor Lokken: Is the Finance Director position advertised?CAO: Not yet, we have the option to look internally first and that is what we are doing.



January 24, 2017 at 7:00 p.m.

• Councillor Lokken: What was discussed regarding Meals on wheels?CAO: I will send details.

• Councillor Missal: Is it possible to tour the new fire halt?CAO: We will set up a tour of the building when it is finished.

• Councillor Missal: I have heard of pucks going through some rink boards. What is the reason for that? And havethey been fixed?CAO: They weaken over time. And they have been fixed.Mayor Warman: That arena is back up and running which is great to see.

• Mayor Warman: I would like to say hats off to administration for sanding the trails. It is above and beyond,higher than our normal service level, but was appreciated by many residents.

• Mayor Warman: t would like to publically say thank you to our Finance Director David ioy (I have said it directly,personally). He came in after the fire, times were turbulent, we had lost records and there was a lot of work todo. He has done that work. We are organized and back on track going forward.

• Mayor Warman: I would like to suggest that we involve the Communications department and do a Q & Asession for the new fire hall. I have done a blog but there still seems to be a lot of questions that are still outthere and we want to be accountable to taxpayers and address their questions and concerns.AHS has expressed some interest in the old building however we can’t sit on this indefinitely if they are notcoming to the table. We should properly vet the property.

Motion #027-17: Moved by Mayor Warman

That Council directs administration to prepare an RFP and hire a realtor to put the property upfor sale.

CARRIED

Reports and New Business:

a) MRC Ice Plant Compressor Replacement Award of Contract — Doug Baird, Project Manager

Motion #028-17: Moved by Councilor Busk

Council directs administration to award a contract to CIMCO Refrigeration for a total cost of$358,136 (plus GST) with 50% to come from the Canada 150 Infrastructure Grant and 50% fromMSI.

CARRIED

b) Bylaw 02-2017, to amend Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 -07— Laurie Skrynyk, Director of Planning and Development

Motion #029-17: Moved by Councilor Busk

That Bylaw #02-2017 to amend various sections of the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 receives FirstReading and the required Public Hearing be scheduled for February 22, 2017.

CARRIED

Page 4of6Regular Meeting of Council Minutes - January 24, 2017 of 140


January 24, 2017 at 7:00 p.m.

c) Subdivision —Animal Rescue Committee —Time Extension - Laurie Skrynyk, Director of Planning and Development

MoUon#030-17: Moved by Councilor Brandle

That Council approves an extension for registration of subdivision 6011.13/ SUBO1.16 to August01, 2017.

CARRIED

Councilor Brandle excused herself from the meeting due to a Conflict of Interest at 7:40 pm.

d) Homes by Northplex, Amending Agreement - Laurie Skrynyk, Director of Planning and Development

Motion #03117: Moved by Councilor Missal

That Council approves the Master Sale and Development Amending Agreement between theTown of Slave Lake and Homes by Northplex Ltd. Dated December 01, 2016 to expire on June30, 2018.

CARRIED

Councilor Brandle returned to the meeting at 7:50 pm.

Mayor’s Corner:

The Minster of Infrastructure visited Slave Lake last week and announced recipients of the Canada 150Infrastructure grant. We were a recipient, for which we are thankful.I also want to be clear with Council and the public that this was the Minsters meeting, not Slave Lake’s meeting.We provided the venue.Not having the “opposition” present was their protocol not ours.

• Councillor Busk: Yes he is welcome to come to Slave Lake anytime.• Councilor Missal: Yes he was fantastic about everything.• I have had a couple Firesmart discussion meetings to get up to date on that committee.• We had a hotel operators meeting today to facilitate who will take that on.• Councillor Brandle is also Deputy Mayor Brandle and she will be taking over for the next few days. I will be away

and lam looking forward to it.

Correspondence:

a) News Release — Canada 150 Community Infrastructure Program• Information Sharing

Page 5of6Regular Meeting of Council Minutes - January 24, 2017 of 140


January 24, 2017 at 7:00 p.m.

b) Teepee and firepit at the Legacy Centre

Motion 14032-17: Moved by Councillor Brandle

That Council directs administration to write a letter of support to the Sawridge First Nation forthe CIP Canada 150 grant application.

CARRIED

c) Email — New Minister of Municipal Affairs — Honourable Shaye Anderson

• We were very fortunate to have our MLA as the Minister of Affairs. It is a very important Ministry and allof Danielle Larivee’s hard work was much appreciated. We wish her luck in her new role.

• Lisa has been directed to reach out to the new minister on our behalf. We are hoping to set up a meetingwith him in the near future. We welcome the Honorable Shaye Anderson into his new role and we lookforward to working with him in the future.

Adjournment:

Motion t033-l7: Moved by Councillor McGregor

That Council adjourn the January 24, 2017 Committee of the Whole Meeting of Council at 7:58pm.

CARRIED

Tyler Warman, Mayor Brian Vance, Chief Administrative Officer


TOWN OF

.SLAVE LAKE

Town of Slave Lake

Community Services Projects Status Report

Status Report Period: Last Quarter 2016- jSt Quarter, 2017

Names of Projects: Recreation Master Plan, MRC Hot Water Tank, MRC AirBalanceIHVAC, CJ Schurter Park Accessible Playground Surface, and CJ SchurterParklSpringwood Bridge Rehab, Annual Unscheduled Parks Upgrades, Tree Pruning

Project Manager: Ruth Rolfe Project Sponsor: Ruth Rolfe

Start Date: January 2016 Completion Date: December 2016

Project Objective I Mission: To provide enhanced year round facilities, parks and openspaces that inspire Slave Lake and area residents to strengthen their overall weilness,

Review of Capital Proiects for Community Services:

Recreation Master Plan: Provide a 10 year plan for Parks, Facilities and programming.MRC Hot Water Tank: Replace hot water tank that was a deficiency from 2011modernization project.MRC Air Balance/HVAC: Air balance deficiency from 2011 modernization project.CJ Schurter Playground: Install of recycled rubber fall surface for accessible playground.CJ Schurter/Springwood Bridge Rehab: Rehab work for bridge, includes sand blasting andpainting of structure. Decking will be replaced along with added mesh for fall protection.Annual Unscheduled Parks Upgrades: Every year there are unforeseen parks projects thatcome up, including this as Capital expenses rather than operational allows the use ofMSI funds.Tree Pruning: Remove unsightly andlor possibly dangerous branches from roadways,walkways and trails.

Schedule Status:Recreation Master Plan: Revamped plan was presented to Council in October by Stantecthat addressed issues brought up after first reading in May. Final report has beencompleted, waiting for copies.MRC Hot Water Tank: Done.MRC Air Balance/HVAC: DoneCJ Schurter Playground: DoneCJ Schurter? Springwood Bridge Rehab: Bridge Rehab work was completed in late October,there are still some minor deficiencies that will need to be addressed in spring 2017.

IA

LA

Community Services Project Status Report - Ruth Rolfe, Direc... of 140

Annual Unscheduled Parks Upgrades: Done. Signage at all parks were upgraded and 4 newpicnic tables were purchased for various parks.Tree Pruning: Done

Projects Budgets:

Rec. Master Plan - $75,000MRC Hot Water Tank -$16,000MRC Air Balance - $ 31,500CJ Schurter Playground

— $ 30,000CJ Schurter Park! Springwood Bridge - $ 300,000Annual Unscheduled Parks Upgrades: $ 20,000Tree Pruning: $20,000

Budget Status:

Rec. Master Plan: (2015 project) Came in at $73,500. Stantec had more updates to makecoming out of the October presentation and there will be hard copies of the plan for Councilearly in 2017.

MRC Hot Water Tank: (2015 project) Came in slightly under the $16,000 budget at $13,998.The MRC is set up for and requires 3 hot water tanks for maximum capacity to be achieved.One of the original hot water tanks have replaced. Currently we are running on only 2 hot watertanks with one very likely nearing the end of its life expectancy, a new hot water tank is highpriority for the MRC.

MRC Air Balance: Came in just over $31500 budget at $32,600, due to unexpected ductcleaning work. The air balance company could not complete work when originally scheduled inas ductwork and many fan belts were too dirty and damaged. Northern Air was called in toclean ducts, and our maintenance replaced belts, so that ACCU-air could complete work airbalance which required the rental of scissor-lift again as well.

CJ Schurter Playground: Came in under the $30,000 budget, the total cost was $26,040 withan Alberta Recycling grant covering $11,200 resulting in an actual cost $14,840 and $15,160under budget.

CJ Schurter Park! Springwood Bridge: Should come in well under $300,000 budget. Totalcost was just over $185,000 and that included using part of the contingency funds for additionalstringers that changed the scope of the project, as well as some additional time in the paint bay,but was still under the maximum of $195,000 in projected cost ($119,000 Contractor; $35,000engineer; $40,000 contingency). There has been roughly $15,000 that is already allocated topayables, that is remaining to be paid when deficiencies are accounted for this spring.

Annual Unscheduled Parks Upgrades: Came in just under the $20,000 budget with the parksigns/boards refurbishing and new install coming in at a total of $14,143.75 and picnic tablescosting $5,786.

Tree Pruning: Came in under the $20,000 budget at a total of $16,850. This work wascompleted in three parts based on information gathered from a public survey, a drive-around byparks staff and as the outcome of the trails and pathways Health and Safety Inspection.

2


Plans for Next Period: All outstanding capital projects are completed with the exception ofoutstanding deficiencies with the bridge, which will be revisited in the spring.

Submitted by: Approved by:

Derek Starnes Brian VanceManager of Facilities and Parks Chief Administrative OfficerRuth RolteDirector Community of Services

3


00G

eneralR

evenue

Tow

nof

Slavelak

e2017

Operating

Budget

Estim

ates

IndexM

ainS

heet

Allocation

ofG

rantR

even

ue

Am

ongP

rogram

sand

Facilities

(“Cu

rrent”

vs.P

roposed

Inter-M

un

icipal

Ag

reemen

t)

7:-El

7-5

203

IC

--3

U

Co-nm

unityS

ervicesA

drn*(14.66%

)5

po

al

Events

Adjit

P’-:-iram

mi”e

VD

19

‘og

amm

irgM

ulliRec

Do

te,

\oih

ern

.52

.5A

quacoC

enterS

portsFields

(referto

Parks)

Parks

&R

ecreation-

Adm

inistration$0$0$0$0

$477,501

$2,500$17,540

$0$6,158$0$3,070

$278

,420

$7,682

($2,115)

$283,98721066°/o

$5,982

IS

289,9

69

41

j‘X

HW

1flI%

Ii(liW

i!icnln

t-ii

.C

ou

nty

Operatin

gL

essN

etO

peratin

gC

ost

Sh

areC

ost

Rev

enu

eC

ost

Gran

t21

07P-0

$335,713$0

$3

35

71

3$70,722

$68,09358,994

$59,100$12,450

$25,565$10,306

$15,259$3,214

$96,999$44,695

$52,303$11,018

$819,548$292,912

$326,636$110,942

$515,106$134,522

$330,584$80,174

$10,893$2,629

$8,263$1,741

$5,135$11,564

($6,429)($1,354)

$321,387$0

$321,387$67,704

$14,199$171

$14,028$2,955

$17,220$0

$77,220$16,267

$2,289,859$505,793

$1,784,066$375,833

$38,964$2,500

$36,464$7,682

$7,500$17,540

($10,040)($2,115)

$381,400

72-08P

arks72-tO

JointU

so72-41

Grass

Cjtt

19

Anim

alS

tieller

Cem

etery

—I

.‘-.-

‘1a1.J

.nl.t

4

[eratin

Cost

Net

OP

eratin

9]c:s

t

210

7

$230,033$0

$230,033$48,459

$68,093$10,500

$57,593$12,133

$25,565$7,500

$18,065$3

80

6$96,999

$42,500$54,499

$11,481$819,548

$278,001$541,547

$114,083$515,106

$139,000$376,106

$79,231$0

$0$0

$29,232

MD

Sharo

ofA

dministration

$14,575$1,799,150

$38,964

$7,500

$0$29,232$0$14,575

$1,321,649

$36,464($10,040)

21

06

6%

S8,035

IS

389,434(

1130120174:26

PM


TOWN OF

SLAVE LAKEREPORT TO COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7. 2017

FROM: Calvin Couturier Acting Director of Operations DATE: February 7, 2017

Subject: Contract Award — Residential Garbage and Recycle Collection

[cZZZJZZZZZZ__ZZThe purpose of this report is to present the results of the Request for Proposals forCollection and Disposal of Solid Waste from residential dwellings and recommend awardof the Contract.

LozzzJTzzEzJzzJzThe existing curbside garbage and recycle contract with GEL expires on March 1,2017.A request for proposals for collection and disposal of solid waste from residentialdwellings was posted on the Alberta Purchasing Connection website. The REP closedon Jan 20, 2017 at 2:00 PM. Three proposals were received; CWD Waste Solutions,GEL Green for Life Environmental, and Iron Enterprises.

Since the existing contract expires on March 1, it is important that a new contractor beselected very soon in order to allow adequate time for implementation.

CWD GEL Iron Enterprises

Weight Score Total Score Total Score Total

Proposed Pricing 40 6 2.40 10 4.00 0 0.00

Customer Service History 30 9 2.70 9 2.70 0 0.00

Proposal Quality, Clarity &Methodology 20 10 2.00 10 2.00 10 2.00

Municipal Experience 5 0 0.00 5 0.25 0 0.00

Other Consideration 5 3 015 3 0.15 3 0.15

Total 7.25 9.10 2.15

GEL was the lowest cost bidder as well as the highest scoring bidder.considerable experience with curbside garbage and recycle collection.residential garbage collection experience but does have commercial garbage collectionexperience. It is a small but growing company.

They haveCWD has no

Residential Garbage Collection - Calvin Couturier, Acting Di... of 140

Report to Council Page 2 of 4

GEL will haul waste to the Lesser Slave Lake Regional Waste Landfill. Recycle will behauled to a recycle sorting station in Edmonton.

A detailed price comparison between the bidders and the previous contract is attachedin Appendix A. GELs price was considerably lower than the previous contract.

GEL includes a 3% per year escalation which will result in a $24600 annual increase bythe final year.

They also include a fuel surcharge based on the fuel cost rising to over $1.00 per litre. Iffor example they used 2500 liters per month and if fuel goes up by $0.05 per liter thecost increase will be $125 or $0.06 per residence per month. If it went up $0.50 per literthe additional cost to each resident would be $0.62 per month. In actual fact they willlikely use less than 2500 liters. This procedure allows the contractor to bid the lowestpossible price without any built in margin to cover potential fuel price increases.

Prices were given for both weekly and bi-weekly recycle collection. The bi-weekly ratesfor GEL were $0.36 per resident per month less expensive or $8407 less on an annualtotal basis,

GFL employs local people and owns a shop in town. They offer commercial andindustrial waste collection services in Town as well.

GEL has not proposed any changes to the current schedule.

GEL has included a spring and fall residential cleanup pickup and Christmas tree pickup.

High Prairie recently entered into a contract for garbage pickup for $5.20 (with a priceescalation clause) per household compared to GELs bid price of $3.35 per month.

The number of residential pickups covered under this agreement will be determined fromthe Garbage Collection Eees as shown on the Towns monthly utility bills and will onlyinclude garbage cart pickup service. It is presently 1996.

GEL is already providing the service so there will be no interruptions.

roPTloN______

Council can choose to award the contract to GEL or to one of the other bidders.

Options with GEL include choosing whether to have weekly or bi-weekly recycle pickup.


Report to Council Page 3 o[ 4

IRESOURCEIMPACTS IThe costs are summarized in Appendix A. The cost under the existing contract is$246,833 annually.

The cost [or the new contract with weekly pickup will be $162,866. This is a $3.50 perhousehold per month decrease.

The cost for the new contract with bi-weekly pickup will be $154,459. This is a $3.86 perhousehold per month decrease.

These costs are covered by the utility rate which will be reviewed in March.

If Council chooses biweekly recycle collection, residents will have to be notified.

ERØLcRtPëPbO1LJ

Administration recommends that Council awards the 5 year contract to GEL for:- Garbage pickup at $3.35 per month per dwelling.- Si-weekly recycle pickup $2.75 per month per dwelling.- Brush Bins $0.00 per week rent and $80 per dump.

MOTION REQUESTED:

Council directs administration to award the garbage and recycle collection contract to GELfor 5 years as follows:

- Garbage pickup at $3.35 per month per dwelling.- Bi-weekly recycle pickup S2.75 per month per dwelling.- Brush Bins $0.00 per week rent and $80 per dump.

To be funded from utility billing.

Report P d by: Report Approved for Council by:

C i ou Brian VanceActing Director of Operations Chief Administrative Officer


Report to Council Page 4 of 4

Appendix ACWD Waste CR Green for Iron Enterprises CR existing

Solutions Life prices

Environmental

Curbside_Garbage_Pjcjçjjp

Per Week Per Dwelling $1.36 S5.i0 $1.20

Per Month Per Dwelling $5.89 $3.15 $22.10 $4.80

Per Year Per Dwelling $70.84 $40.25 $265.20 $62.40

Peryeartotal $141,396.64 $80,335.01 $529,339.20 $124,550.40

Curbside_Recycle_Pick_Up

Option_I_Weekly

Per Week Per Dwelling $1.81 50.72 54 Nus E1l.L(J, $1.10t H

Purwonth Per Dwelling $7.84 $3.10 $U),4[)Plus Sbi)P01 $4.4Qtoliflp

Per Year Per Dwelling $94.29 $37.18 $2S/.20 Plus $80.00! $57.20tonn,

Peryeartotal -— $188,202.84 $74,211.26 not calculated $114,171.20

OptIon_RI-Weekly

Per bi•week Per Dwelling $1.44 $0.63 5)30 PIus $80.00!Ion flu

Per Month Per Dwelling $6.22 $2.75 $20.1 Plus 550.00/tonne

Per Year Per Dwelling $74.66 $32.97 $241.80 Plus 550.00/

tonne

Per year total $149,021.36 $65,804.13 not calculated__ NA

Town Owned Recycle Center

2Syd Bin

Rental per week $25.00 $0.00 $43.75 $38.00Delivery/Disposal Charge per week $95.00 $80.00 $160/hr $40.00Total Per Week $120.00 $80.00 $78.00Total Per Month $520.00 $346.67 $312.00

Total per Year $6,240.00 $4,160.00 $4,056.00

Option 2 Bi-Weekly Total Cost Bi weekly $5,818.82 $2,970.37 NA

per montl $25,214.89 $12,871.59

per year $302,898.00 $154,459.14

y4n

Rental per week

Delivery/Disposal Charge per week

Total Per Week

Total Per Month

Total per Year

Option 1 WeeklvJqtatCost per weekper monti

per year

$25.00

$95.00

$120.09

$520.00

$6,240.00

$6,567.32$28,458.39

$342,079.48

$0.00 $43.75

$80.00 $160/hr

$80.00

$346.67

$4,160.00

S3 .132.04$13,572.19

$162,866.29

Notes: 1) Prices shown are first year rates, 2) GFL has included a 3% inflation per year rate and fuel surcharge.

3) Iron Enterprises has included a 2% inflation per year rate.

Number of residential pickups: 1996

$38.00

$40.00

$78.00

$312.00

$4,056.00

$4,746.80$18,987.20

$246,833.60


TOWN OF

SLAVE LAKEREPORT TO COUNCIL MEETING OF 7th FEBRUARY, 2017

FROM: Laurie SkrynykDirector of Planning and Development

SUBJECT: Off-site Levy Study and Bylaw #29-2016

UjCZZZZZ

DATE: January 30, 2017

FILE: 6020.01

The purpose of this report is for Council to hold the required Public Hearing and considerSecond and Third Reading for Off-site Levy Bylaw #29-201 6.

LePZiEZZZZJZEJProposal:

History:

That Council considers the report prepared by Administrationoutlining the updates to the Offsite Levy Study and new updatedOffsite Levy Bylaw #29-2016.

Over the past 15 months the Planning Department has beenworking with Council, Associated Engineering and the ChamberCommittee to conduct an in-depth review of our off-site levyprocess, philosophy, the study and the bylaw.Further, in early 2015 Administration had Brownlee LLP review thecurrent study and Off-site Levy Bylaw. L. Randa, Brownlee LLPprovided an in depth summary of his review and suggestedchanges to both the Study and the Bylaw.

The updates to the Study and Off-site Levy Bylaw #29-2016include all of the recommendations made by Mr. Randa.Referral Comments: The Off-site Levy Bylaw has been advertised in the LakesideLeader Newspaper for a period of two weeks. To date no verbalor written comments have been received.

_DISCUSSION

OFF-SITE LEVYSTUDY:

Please find attached to this report the updated Offsite Levy Studyprepared by Associated Engineering. The updates included in thenew Study are as follows:

Bylaw #29-2016, Off - Site Levy Bylaw - Laurie Skrynyk, Dire... of 140

- a

Report to CouncilPage 2 of 4

Oft-site Levy Study and Off-site Levy Bylaw #29-2016January 30, 2017

Benefiting Area: Additional explanation to the definition of the benefitting areadescriptions have been included throughout the report. Thisshould help to clarify that the levies are fairly proportioned to alldevelopment (existing and future) including consideration forresidual benefit.

Planning Horizon: The Planning Horizon has been defined and is based on theinfrastructure system capacity and planning studies. This isgenerally considered 25 years.Carrying Levies: The Study defines that levies will be carried until debentures arepaid and the asset is 25 years old. As per discussion withCouncil, Council does not want to carry items that are no longer acash burden to the Town and may be near the end of useful life.Project Casts and Project costs and status have been updated. The Study maintains

Status: the CPI increase, which has been carried out in accordance withPolicy C.d. 014 for several years.Summary and The summary and recommendation are revised to include a 2016Recommendations: and 2018 rate tables. This will ensure Administration does notneed to revisit the levy tables again in 2018 when major projectswill be removed i.e. debentures paid or infrastructure at the end ofits life.

Existing Developed The summary tables clearly show the existing developmentand Future Growth: component and growth component, which serves two purposes.First, it shows fair allocation to all benefitting areas and second, itdefines the portion allocated to existing development that Councildoes not want to charge or will consider alternate revenue sourcesfor (i.e. utility rates).

Legal Review of Administration had L. Randa conduct a review of the proposedNew Study: updated Off-site Levy Study. Mr. Randa reported that “upon ourreview of the Report and in consideration of the revisions andcomments above (i.e. in his letter attached) it is our opinion thatthe Report is well drafted and addresses the concerns andissues raised with the Town’s previous 2009 Report. Assuch, there are no further revisions necessary, in our opinion,to the Report to support the Town’s Off-site Levy Bylaw.”OFF-SITE LEVY Due comments provided by L Randa on our current Off-site Levy

BYLAW #29-2016: Bylaw, Administration had him draft a new, legally acceptablebylaw i.e. Bylaw #29-2016. Mr. Randa outlines, in his letterattached, the sections he added to the Bylaw and the reasons fortheir inclusion.


Report to CouncilPage 3 of 4Oft-site Levy Study and Off-site Levy Bylaw #29-2016

January 30, 2017

Option 1: Council could give the Off-site Levy Bylaw #29-2016 Second andThird Reading.

Option 2: Council could defeat Bylaw #29-2016 on Second Reading and theexisting Off-site Levy Bylaw would remain in effect.

Option 3: Council could direct Administration to make further revisions toBylaw #29-2016 and bring it back for Second and Third Reading.

ci]MAttC _Z_ZZ1Council may wish to consider alternate ways to finance the oil-sitelevies for re-developed lots that will no longer be collected.

[OUCYjCATIONSZZZ

The new direction outlined in the Off-site Levy Policy C.d. 027 withrespect to not collecting off-site levies on re-developed lots hasbeen captured in the Study and Bylaw.

zzzzzziA Public Hearing for Bylaw #29-2016 was advertised in the localnewspaper for a period of two weeks.

Letters will be sent to the local real estate and lawyer officesadvising of the changes and updates once the Bylaw is passed.

LCOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL

This Study and Bylaw #29-2016 are a culmination of approximately a year and a half ofhard work on behalf of Council, Administration and Associated Engineering. The newStudy and Bylaw reflect CounciVs new philosophy and are legally sound documents.

As such, the Planning Department recommends Council give the Off-site Levy Bylaw#29-2016 Second and Third Reading.


Report to Council Page 4 of 4Off-site Levy Study and Oft-site Levy Bylaw #29-20 16January 30, 2017

MOTION REQUESTED:

1. That the Off-site Levy Bylaw #29-2016 receives Second Reading.

2. That the Off-site Levy Bylaw #29-2016 receives Third Reading.

Attachments:

1. New Updated Off-site Levy Study and Off-site Levy Bylaw 29-20162. December 15, 2016 letter from L Randa RE Review of new Study and Bylaw.3. Off-site Levy Policy C.d. 027

Report Prepared by: Report Approved for Council by:

___

/

________

Laurie Skrynyk ;) Brian VanceDirector of-Planning & Development Chief Administrative Officer


TOWN OF SLAVE LAKEBYLAW No. 29- 2016

A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF SLAVE LAKE, IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, FOR THEPURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING AN OFF-SITE LEVY FOR LAND THAT IS TO BESUBDIVIDED OR DEVELOPED WITHIN THE TOWN OF SLAVE LAKE.

WHEREAS the Municipal Government Act, RSA 2000, c. M-26, as amended or repealed andreplaced from time to time, permits a Council to impose a levy known as an Off-Site Levy inrespect of land to be developed or subdivided within a municipality’s limits, and to authorize anAgreement to be entered into for payment of the levy;

AND WHEREAS the Municipality has engaged in consultation with representatives of thedevelopment industry to address and define existing and future infrastructure requirements ofthe Municipality with respect to circumstances of the Municipality and the benefits ofdevelopment;

AND WHEREAS the Municipality received advice and a Report respecting upgrades to Off-SiteInfrastructure which set out a fair and equitable calculation of Off-Site Levies in accordance withthe purpose of the Municipal Government Act, RSA 2000, c. M-26, as amended or repealed andreplaced from time to time;

AND WHEREAS Council has advertised its intention to consider the provision of this Bylawpursuant to the requirements of the Municipal Government Act, RSA 2000, c. M-26, asamended or repealed and replaced from time to time;

NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Municipality in the Province of Alberta, duly assembled,hereby enacts as follows:

1. Bylaw Title

1.1 This bylaw shall be cited as the Town of Slave Lake’s “Off-Site Levy Bylaw.”

2. Definitions

2.1 The following terms shall have the following meanings in this Bylaw:

a) “Bylaw” means this off-site levy bylaw established by the Municipality;

b) “Chief Administrative Officer” means the Chief Administrative Officer for theTown of Slave Lake, regardless of the specific title that may be conferred on thatOfficer by Council from time to time;

c) “Council” means the Council for the Town of Slave Lake;

d) “Developable Land” shall mean all land contained within the DevelopmentRegion:


I

upon which Development takes place after the date of passing of thisBylaw; or

ii. for which Subdivision approval is obtained after the date of passing of thisBylaw;

excluding all Developed Land.

e) “Developed Land” shall mean land that has been subject to Development or aSubdivision prior to the date of passing of this Bylaw, and in respect of which off-site levies for the same infrastructure have been paid.

f) “Development” means “development” as defined in the Municipal GovernmentAct, R.S.A. 2000, c. M-26, s. 616, as amended or repealed and replaced fromtime to time.

g) “Development Agreement” means “development agreement” as referred to inthe Municipal Government Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. M-26, ss. 650 and 655, asamended or repealed and replaced from time to time.

h) “Development Region” includes the area of land within the municipalboundaries of the Municipality identified in Schedule “B”, attached;

i) “Growth” shall mean:

the creation of new lots through Subdivision; and

ii. the occurrence of Development.

j) “Municipality” means the Town of Slave Lake.

k) “Off-Site Infrastructure” shall mean those components and projects referred toin the Reports, in relation to water supply facilities and infrastructure, wastewaterfacilities and infrastructure, and storm water infrastructure;

I) “Off-Site Levy” means the off-site levy imposed pursuant to this Bylaw underthe authority of the Municipal Government Act, RSA 2000, c. M-26, as amendedor repealed and replaced from time to time;

m) “Report” means the “2016 Oft-Site Levies Review” prepared by AssociatedEngineering, dated November 2016, attached hereto as Schedule “C”;

n) “Subdivision” means “subdivision” as defined in the Municipal Government Act,R.S.A. 2000, c. M-26, s. 616, as amended or repealed and replaced from time totime.

3. Imposition of Levy

3.1 There is hereby imposed a levy which shall be known as an Off-Site Levy in respect ofall Developable Land.

3.2 The amount of the Off-Site Levy imposed is as calculated in Schedule “A”.


3.3 The Off-Site Levy is comprised of the Off-Site Infrastructure, and pursuant to thecalculation details contained in this Bylaw and the Report.

3.4 The Off-Site Levy will be assessed on all Developable Land within the DevelopmentRegion on a per hectare basis as provided in Schedule “A” of this Bylaw, excludingthose portions of Developable Land that are designated pursuant to a Subdivision as:

a) Environmental Reserve;

b) Municipal Reserve; and

c) Undevelopable lands.

3.5 Unless otherwise agreed upon, the Off-Site Levy is due and payable prior to theendorsement of Subdivision approval for the Developable Land or the issuance of aDevelopment permit in relation to the Developable Land.

4. Objects, Principles and Criteria

4.1 The objects, principles and criteria of the Oft-Site Levy shall be in accordance with thefollowing:

a) This Bylaw creates an OH-Site Levy to provide funds for the construction of Off-Site Infrastructure required for Growth.

b) Development in new growth areas through Off-Site Levies will provide the capitalthat will fund the infrastructure required for Growth. Those who benefit from theinfrastructure, which is defined by all Developable Land in the DevelopmentRegion, should share proportionally, on a per hectare basis, in related costs.

c) Provision of Off-Site Infrastructure by developers of Developable Land will notcreate an advantage or penalty due to the time or location of development.

d) Off-Site Infrastructure will be provided to maintain sustainable, cost effective andorderly Growth.

e) The calculation of the Off-Site Levy should be an open and transparent process.

f) All funds collected from the Off-Site Levy will be credited to a separate anddistinct, identifiable Off-Site Levy account, which may be invested as per theMunicipality’s Investment Policy until used for the construction of the specifiedOff-Site Infrastructure. The management of the Off-Site Levy account should bean audited process, with reports available to the public and industry.

g) The Off-Site Levy will help allow the Municipality to recover the cost ofinfrastructure required for Growth:

Using financing strategies that remain sustainable;

H. Facilitating development by reducing risk on early developers andensuring future developers share the costs of the facilities from whichthey benefit; and


iii. Promoting cost effective and orderly development;

h) The Oft-Site Levy will help promote orderly development by:

Providing Off-Site Infrastructure, once the appropriate planning is inplace, and when warranted in development; and

Providing infrastructure for contiguous development;

i) The Off-Site Levy will help create a transparent process by:

Providing opportunity for affected landowners and developers input intothe levy, its definition and administration;

Conforming with the Municipal Government Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. M-26, asamended or repealed and replace from time to time; and

Providing reports on the Oft-Site Levy;

j) The Off-Site Levy will help create a clear process for calculation of the rate,levies and credits by:

Creating consistent and predictable levies and credits;

Creating predictable and stable levies over time; and

Documenting a process for establishing the levy rate.

5. Development Agreements

5.1 The entering into of a Development Agreement with respect to, amongst other things,the collection of an Off-Site Levy is hereby authorized.

5.2 Council delegates the authority to enforce and administer this Bylaw, including, but notlimited to, the authority to enter into Development Agreements on behalf of theMunicipality and to defer or waive collection of the Off-Site Levy imposed pursuant tothis Bylaw, to the Chief Administrative Officer.

5.3 Council may from time to time adopt policies or guidelines for the assistance anddirection of the Chief Administrative Officer in determining which Development andSubdivision applications shall require a Development Agreement or where to defer orwaive collection of the Off-Site Levy imposed pursuant to this Bylaw.

5.4 Where it is determined that a Development Agreement is appropriate for any applicationfor Development or Subdivision, the applicant or the owner, as the case may be, shallenter into a Development Agreement with the Municipality and such DevelopmentAgreement shall ensure that:

a) provision be made for the payment of the Off-Site Levy as specified in this Bylaw,or that provision may be made for the deferring of payment of the Off-Site Leviesto a future time certain or uncertain, including the requirement for security for thepayment of such deferred payment of any Off-Site Levy; and


b) no further the Off-Site Levy for each type of Off-Site Infrastructure shall berequired to be paid under Development Agreements for lands, which are thesubject of the Development or Subdivision application, that have been previouslyimposed Off-Site Levies and which have been collected in full.

6. Accounting

6.1 All funds collected pursuant to this Bylaw shall be accounted for in a special fund andexpended only as permitted under the provisions of the Municipal Government Act,R.S.A. 2000, c. M-26, as amended or repealed and replace from time to time.

7. General

7.1 Nothing in this Bylaw precludes the Municipality from:

a) imposing further or different levies, duly enacted by bylaw, on any portion of theDevelopable Lands in respect of which the Municipality has not collected Off-SiteLevies;

b) deferring collection of the Off-Site Levy for the stated objects of this Bylaw, onany portion of Developable Lands in respect of which the Municipality imposedOff-Site Levies, including requiring security for payment of such deferred Off-Sitelevies; or

c) reducing or forgiving payment of the Off-Site Levies required pursuant to thisBylaw, or otherwise providing for credits for other Off-Site Infrastructureconstructed by a developer in calculating and/or collecting the Off-Site Leviesthat become payable pursuant to this Bylaw.

7.2 Schedules “A” and “B” to this Bylaw may be amended from time to time by resolution ofCouncil.

7.3 This Bylaw shall repeal Bylaw #05-2010 and all amendments thereto upon the passingof this Bylaw.

7.4 In the event that any provision of this Bylaw be declared invalid or void by any Courthaving competent jurisdiction, then such invalid or void provision shall be severed fromthe Bylaw and the remaining provisions of the Bylaw shall be maintained and deemedvalid.

7.5 This Bylaw shall take effect and come into force effective after final reading andsignature thereof by the Chief Elected Official and Chief Administrative Officer, or theirauthorized delegates.

FIRST READING passed in open Council duly assembled in the Municipality, in the Province ofAlberta, this

______

day of,

_________________________

A.D. 2017

MAYOR OFUEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER


(1

SECOND READING passed in open Council duly assembled in the Municipality, in the Provinceof Alberta, this

______

day of,

_____

A.D. 2017

MAYOR CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

THIRD AND FINAL READING passed in open Council duly assembled in the Municipality, theProvince of Alberta, this

______

day of,

_________________________

A.D. 2017.



Tab

le7-

1:O

ff-S

ite

Lev

yC

har

ges

Sum

mar

y20

16U

pdat

e

EA

ST

2S

OU

TH

SJT

HS

OU

TH

NO

R’f’W

ES

TC

EN

TR

AL

EA

ST

’S

ou

th)

IE

AS

TIC

EN

”R%

LJ

“VE

ST,,,,

TC

’LL

NE

TD

EV

EL

OP

AB

LE

AR

EA

‘ha’

-

Pro

port

ionin

gU

ndeve1D

pedndD

eveIo

ped

23

66

I2

06

236?

736

9.56

rSS

:32

4646

INF

RA

ST

RU

CT

UR

EE

ST

IMA

TE

DA

reas

Cal

cula

ted

J,

IC

OM

PO

NE

NT

S

(0

Ben

efit

ing

Are

aC

ost

Ben

efit

UN

DE

VE

LO

PE

DP

OR

TIO

NO

FN

ET

DE

VE

LO

PA

BL

EA

RE

AIh

a}E

xis

ting,

Gro

wth

Exis

ting

Gro

wth

442

71

8I

l1

o.°

-68

.6I

ZOO

SI

I523

489.

5-5

PA

ST

WA

TE

RS

UP

PL

YF

AC

ILIT

YP

RO

JEC

TS

5398

4666

S1465300

31

.E5

37

32

.ete

’Tra

nsm

,ssi

on

$2374500

539.

84666

S1.2

48900

5‘‘

25200

52.

310

:313

:3lo

S2.r3

7*S

2310

23lC

j3

:.aie

’Saora

geapum

pin

g$

2.76

450’

J5

39

83566

$11::

S‘3

30500

S690.S

2690

SS

2690

52610,5

2.‘

flP

-Phase

l$1390800

539B

1%55

$7347003

6822005

3€eS

1360$

1360

360S

l.300S

‘36

5.*

-P

base2

$84

2.90

05

39

84866

S443400

S399,6

005

8203

820

S820k

S8*5

820’!

6*!

SW

TP

,Phase

l$

1168.6

00

53

95

4806

$614700

S3541

:gs

1,13

0S

1’3

O$

3130

S-13::

‘‘3013

1.1

30!S

‘

[,,=

:.1’P

ceser.:

i.s...

$3374.

5398

4866

51775000

S’’3:::IS

21513

?:%

:‘S

11.3

:1

32B

0:

‘—1:

0:2

80

IU

:::t::D

::P

:O

II

9.6

4866

$E

S’’’:S

363

S1

3.4€0

L1:.

.:’

Exp

ansi

onA

rea

IE

oO

xte

,Sta

lvniG

or6

Iar:

.S

750

82.3

823

S37

5.00

05

35000

S4550

$25511

‘1i.

:3ta

*’.S

r.:

nR

ee’,c

S*51*:

151

85

1-1:351:5

351:j

IsP

AS

TW

AS

TE

WA

TE

RT

RE

AT

ME

NT

5VfJ

JT)

&1

I.

CO

LL

EC

TIO

NP

RO

JEC

TS

—f1—

I‘

Se:

.aa%

resIa

-”Z

’,s:

:ss

54::

5393

65

I$

242

13::

31

184.:

::5

4E

:S

4E

:3

4%

:54-513

51-

3115

541%

,12

‘.:1

lTru

nkM

ain

$2..500

31

46

‘160

$2

18

5.9

00

375:5

1:

5651:

7673:

36.

736

I:3

fAai

nO

uff

aliS

24

28

.40

0‘8

03

37

06

579

.490

0$1,6

33,6

00

S3400

314*5

14S

:2-’eas*ase-t$

487900

15’

2006

53426515

4538005

2.26

0S

215

S:...

T”.

-.es

tL

ater

al-

East

ofS

x.’

.nid

ge*ee”$

1.40

3.30

0I’

S*12

S666800

S7366(0

$‘*

70

3‘*213

16S

:,’-

eesl

Late

ral-

West

:

IS

xw

rjdge’e

e.

5U

36S

)8

22

423

S5

19

50

05

519,

500

S6

‘15

5‘1

017

C,3

2,75

1.20

01

33

415

51792200

S90

5,10

05

13430

5*431

‘6.’

.est

l51.r

.*€...e

.S

113.1

‘‘“1

3533

‘51S

3’:::

$4

51

13

4’S

:F

UT

UR

EW

AS

TE

WA

ThR

TR

EA

TM

EN

T(W

rIT

)&

CO

LL

EC

TIO

NP

RO

JEC

TS

*fl

.Vrm

pra

eem

ents

S%

1o:.

:3316

46

55

$2,4

14,1

00

$2.1

76,

S4151

14.

410

$4470

.5

-

‘:

S4:

S445154451

20*1ta

’Se.’

.-e,H

w88E

asI

S58

6.20

05398

4666

S308400

S2

27

90

0$

570

15705

5:0

$.

S-

S570$

5705

570

557

01L

lSta

bont’

Forc

onw

,n$

6,2

000

‘334

71

8$

436.8

601

235,2

00$

3,7

70$

-S

3,2

70$

-S

-S

-5

-S

-S

22.S

Sta

ton’E

”andF

orc

em

a.n

S14C

3,

1914

442

$1137500

526

2.56

0$

59.4

0S

e:r

$-

$-S

-3

--

$IIL

%S

:a,r

-L

anc

r::e

n’4

nS

’V

SuL

34

711

3l,275.S

-S

-S

-S

-$

-S

-

-S

-S

--

PA

ST

ST

OR

MS

EW

ER

PR

OJE

CT

S

_J:.

::-ara4eB

as’

S*00

‘33

2“i

E5

3686605

1016605

‘45

1S

1410

TO

TA

LS

$44

,900

,060

$23

,900

,000

$20

,000

,000

$-

534

,290

$66

,210

$-

$-

$30

.020

538

,060

S37

,290

$48

,180

TO

TA

LO

EF

$IT

EL

EV

YP

ER

AR

EA

$1.

691,

000

S3,

966.

060

S-

$.

52,

069.

000

57,

641,

000

S704000

$3.

962,

900

520,0

00,0

C


Tab

le7-

2:O

ff-S

ite

Lev

yC

har

ges

Sum

mar

yP

endin

g20

18U

pdat

e

CEV

EL0

PM

EN

TA

RE

A

‘E

AS

T2

SO

UT

HS

GL

TH

SO

-IT

HN

OR

TH

WE

ST

CE

NT

RA

LE

Ar

I(S

outt

IE

AS

TC

EN

TR

AL

)W

ES

TN

ET

DE

VE

LO

PA

BL

EA

RE

Aha

)IN

FR

AsT

RuC

TuR

EE

ST

IMA

TE

DP

roport

ionin

gU

ndev

eloped

and

Dev

eloped

Are

asC

alcu

late

d2366

2002

35.7

716

686

[_S

ZfiJ

__,

164.

610054

CO

MP

ON

EN

TS

CO

ST

Ben

efit

ing

Are

aC

ost

Ben

efit

Are

aU

ND

EV

EL

ED

PT

ION

NE

TD

EV

EL

OP

AB

LE

AR

EA

(ha)

Char

ge

-

Exis

ting

Gro

wth

Exis

ting

Gro

wlh

442

71.8

I0.

000

J686

1_200.8

I189

823

I43

6-58

PA

ST

WA

TE

RS

UP

PL

YFA

CIL

ITY

PR

OJE

CT

S

•‘.“9’

134866

S734.7

005

SIll

S3350

71.

380

S.0

736

0I

1.%

GS

542,

003

5394

4866

S44

3.40

0S

7316::

S82

382O

H82

07

520

S8005

820

57’t

.pj5

503

S‘.

168.

600

5396

48-3

5S

614,7

00$

554,

000

ff1305

‘.1305

1130

H51130$

130n30

‘,‘

.Ruse’u:5

,j3

50041::

5398

4856

Sl,

flS

.000$1,6

000005

32805

3280280

jS200:5

3280

S700:

FU

TU

RE

WA

TE

RS

UP

PL

YF

AC

ILIT

YP

RO

JEC

TS

-1—a

‘3a.v

I.arI

nIa

kelr

nprC

vem

enS

‘0Z

.5398

4566

$789D

$711100

$1,

460

$1480

5$

1.46

0$

1A

007

10

S5:,

iE

xuan

sion

Are

s

°I

Booet

arS

lat’

on,G

lonjf

and)

$78

6.06

0823

823

5376000

$375000

S4.

550

Sto

Pum

pS

Iati

onxS

js’R

ese

woir

I$

1250,0

00

151

2008

$87500

$1.

162.

586

$5780

5P

AS

TW

AS

TE

WA

TE

RT

RE

AT

ME

NT(1]&

CO

LL

EC

TIO

NP

RO

JEC

TS

2N

ort

etr

un<

?ar.

$2006500

3246

1160

S2,

385.

000

$80,7

00

$6.

730

S6730

$5730

77Li

ftS

lato

n‘C

’$

2,75

7.26

013

3.4

718

$1,

792.

200

S00

5,10

013

.430

513

,430

‘3.S

toT

ruck

See’

$97

4,86

01334

718

S633700

S34

126

04750

$4,

750

FU

TU

RE

WA

ST

EW

AT

ER

TR

EA

TM

EN

T&

]C

OL

LE

CT

ION

PR

OJE

CIS

LL

.J

39‘a

sIe.

’,al

e’‘e

ar’

e’1

-2ra

seS

—‘5

0000

205398

4864

524b4’d3152’500

74.4

105

44705

.S

‘5147C

7!00,

S20

Ota

llS

ew

erl

v.y

e8E

ast

S665100

5398

4866

$30

8.40

0S

217900

$‘‘

$-

C.

570$

SS’

557

0

21Li

ftS

tati

onC

For

cem

ain

$67

2,00

01334

718

S43

6.80

0$

235200

$3.

270

S3

270

$-

$-

72L

rftS

natv

nE

’$F

or0

8nein

51.4

00000

1914

442

S1,3

31500

$362573

$5.

940

$5940

$-

$-

$-

23L

iftS

raIi

crD

SE

c’e

ma,

S00’5

222

347

5I25.75

-S

-S

-S

-S

-$

-

II

I‘1

TO

TA

LS

$26

,600

.080

$15000000}

110

600

000

526760

$41

,270

S-

$-

$13

,090

$168703

1308

03

17,6

40T

OT

AL

OF

F-S

ITE

LE

WP

ER

AR

EA

$1,1

37,0

00

$2,9

64,0

00

--

897,O

00$3788D

O0

S:4

00e)0

$1451,0

0051o40C

.%C

’

C


9

SCHEDULE “B”MAP OF DEVELOPMENT REGION


II)

SCHEDULE “C”2016 OFF-SITE LEVY REVIEW

Attached


M 0 - 0) 0 0)

-‘ CD r CD ‘C “

C CD ‘C CD

—I

0 0 -4,

0 ‘C CD r CD

?flO E

—I

-m

oU

,

64

z 0 CD C CD -I 0 0i

m -U 0 -I

I-cl

0-

no I


CONFIDENTIALITY AND © COPYRIGHT

This cocume’t is for the sate .se o the addressee and Assoc ated Enc, eernoA;beia Ltc The Ooci’rei1t cDna flS O’OP e:a-yconfidential information that shati not be reproduced in any manner or disciosed to or discussed with any other pa’t.es wtho-jt P’e exoresswritten permission of Associated Engineering Aibena Do Information in this document is to be considered the intellectual property ofAssociated Engineenng Alberta Ltd in accordance with Canadian copyright law.

This reror was preoored byAssocated Enareecng Athena Ltd ‘or the aocount 0’ Tn of Siave Lake 10e materat ‘nit reftectsAsscciatedEngineering Alberta Ltd S best judgement. in the t’ght of the informat:cn avatahie to it at the tire of prepa-ation Any use wr cn a thirc partymakes ot this repon, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility ot such third parties Associated EngineenngAlbena Ltd accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on thisreport.


REPORT

Table of Contents

SECTIONPAGE NO.

Table of Contents

List of Tablesii

List of Figuresiii

I Introduction 1-11.1 General

I-I1.2 Off-Site Levy Charges 1-I1.3 Purpose and Scope 1-11.4 Planning Hoñzon 1-3

2 Previous Levy By-Laws 2-12.1 General

. 2-12.2 Previous Infrastructure Debentures 2-12.3 Existing South Sanitary Trunk Sewer 2-2

3 Water Supply Facilities 3-13.1 Existing Water Supply System 3-13.2 Future Water Supply Requirements 3-23.3 Future Water Distribution System 3-23.4 South Expansion Area Structure Plan 3-2

4 Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities 4-14.1 Existing Wastewater System 4-14.2 Future Waslewater Treatment Plant 4-24.3 Future Sanitary Sewer Collection System 4-2

5 Roadway Systems 5-16 Stormwater Drainage Systems 6-17 Summary

7-18 Recommendations 8-1

Associated GLOBAl PERSPFCTI Vt.Engineering LOCAL FOCUS.

I


REPORT

—- — -.

List of Tables

PAGE NO.

Table 1-1 Benefitting Area Summary 1-3Table 2-1 Retired Debentures 2-1Table 2-2 South Sanitary Trunk Sewer 2-2Table 3-1 Past Water Projects 3-1Table 4-1 Past Sewer Projects 4-1Table 4-2 Sanitary Sewer Improvements 4-3Table 7-1 Present Off-Site Levies 7-2Table 7-2 Future Off-Site Levies (2018 and Beyond) 7-3

AssocIated 6LOBAI PERSPECtIVE.-.Engineering LOCAL FOCUS.II


REPORT

-s- - -

List of Figures

PAGE NO.

Figure 1-1 Existing and Future Land Use Areas within Town Limits 1-5Figure 3-1 Overview of Major Existing Components of Town’s Water Supply System 3-5Figure 3-2 Overview of Future Water System Needs 3-7Figure 4-1 Overview of Major Existing Components of Town’s Wastewater System 4-5Figure 4-2 Overview of the Future Wastewater Needs 4-7

Associated GLOBAL PFRSPECTIVE.Engineering j LOCAL FOCUS.

Ill


REPORT

- —

I Introduction1.1 GENERAL

The growth of a community generally has impacts on the municipal infrastructure systems. Developmentrequires extensions of municipal services such as water, sewer, roadways, etc., and may require that theexisting treatment systems be expanded or upsized to satisfactorily accommodate continued growth.

It is the philosophy of the Town of Slave Lake that development will be responsible for its proportionateshare of the costs of municipal infrastructure systems required to accommodate growth. The purpose is tominimize the financial burden that would otherwise be placed on existing developed areas of the Townthrough general taxation or utility rates. This is achieved through the assessment of Off-Site Levies againstindividual developers used to offset proportionate amounts of past and future infrastructure projects.

1.2 OFF-SITE LEVY CHARGES

In the context of this report, Off-Site Levies are defined as those costs assessed by the Town of Slave Lakeagainst land developers for their proportionate cost share of municipal infrastructure systems constructedby the Town which benefit the development.

The Off-Site Levies are assessed accordingly against lands undergoing development in accordance withterms and conditions of the Development Agreement and/or Development Permit negotiated with eachrespective builder, applicant or developer.

Under authority of the Municipal Government Act, the Town is permitted to impose Off-site Levies againstdevelopment to cover the costs of any or all of the following:

a) New or expanded facilities for the storage, transmission, treatment or supplying of waterb) New or expanded facilities for the treatment, movement, and disposal of sanitary sewage.c) New or expanded storm sewer drainage facilities.d) New or expanded roads required for or impacted by subdivisions or development.e) Lands required for or in connection with any facilities described in (a) to (c) above.

1.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The Town of Slave Lake engaged Associated Engineering Alberta Ltd. (AE) to undertake a review of theTowns Off-Site Levies (previously termed Developer Charges) related to the Waterworks. SanitarySewerage, Stormwater Drainage and Roadways systems in 2004 with updates in 2009. The Town hasexperienced significant change since 2009 with projects being completed, debenture payments ending andthe 2011 wildfire that resulted in significant recovery efforts. This report provides an further update to the2004 report with the primary objective to analyze and update, where appropriate, the existing developmentcharges consistent with current; debt loads, infrastructure plans, construction costs planned futureexpansions.

GLOBAL PERSPECTI Vt.EngIneering LOCAL FOCUS. 1-1


Town of Slave Lake

It was also necessary to establish some general assumptions respecting this review, as well asdevelopment charge calculation criteria:

• The Town will continue to assume responsibility to ensure the implementation of the infrastructuresystems and facilities, which they deem to be a benefit to the Town at large.

• The Development Charges are based on constructing municipal improvements consistent with therequirements identified in the respective Master Plans to serve the lands within the presentcorporate limits of the Town.

• The Development Charge rates are expressed on a net developable hectare basis, where the netdevelopable hectare is defined as the total land area minus land identified as EnvironmentalReserve, or Municipal Reserve school sites or undevelopable lands.

• Levies allocations be calculated based on all benefitting land, whether developed or undeveloped, ifthe elements are deemed to provide a benefit such as: increased system capacity or longevity,improved level-of-service (e.g.. higher quality water), and/or improved reliability or redundancy(i.e., less down time risk).

• All costs are estimated in 2016 dollars. These cost estimates should be reviewed annually to reflectannual construction costs, based on a suitable construction cost index.

• Where conditional grants have been secured by the Town towards a specific project, the projectcost has been reduced by the amount of the grant.

• Unconditional grants (e.g., AMIP, MSI. SIP, etc.), even though they may have been utilized by theTown for financing a project, are not deducted from the final project costs, as it can be rationalizedthat such funding could have been used for other projects.

• Completed project costs have been adjusted from the date of completion, based on theConstruction Index rather than including carrying costs.

• Portions of the municipal infrastructure systems, such as the water distribution and sanitary trunksewer systems, are capable of serving areas outside of the current corporate limits of the Town;however, these additional areas were not used in calculating the development charge rate. Forthese lands (Waterfront and Sawridge areas), should such development occur and connection tothe Town’s systems be approved, the development charge rates as established for lands within thecorporate limits can be applied.

• Projects identified for Off-Site Levy recovery will be considered until debenture payments end andthe project is reached a defined useful life, which will be 25 years in this case.

Assumptions and/or calculation cnteha specific to each development charge are further highlighted in moredetail within each respective section of this report.

The first step was to identify the lands within the corporate limits of the Town against which developmentcharges would be assesse& Figure 1-1 identifies existing and future land use areas within the Town’scorporate limits. Lands considered Environment Reserve or Municipal Reserve, and/or undevelopable landsare shown on the Plan to provide an indication of the gross land area. The total (gross) land area, within theTown’s corporate limits is 1,457 hectares.

1-2dser vices2OO6\at,5orO1 OO_,ad.’ce\davelopmerfl cF,arges2O16_update\rpt_2O16l I 23 drlt docx


1 - Introduction

The total net developable (and, within the current corporate limits is 1026.4 hectares. The net developableland area is proportioned into the following benefiting areas (as shown in Table 1-1) for developmentcharge calculations. The benefiting areas generally reflects the main sanitary sewer catchment areas.

North of Highway 2

Table 1-1Benefihing Area Summary

Nc)Iri

vi..

East 1

East 2;r,;H

235.6

205 2

34.7

73,6

68.6

44.18 191.43

71.82 133.36

34.7

73 6

68.5 0.0

•5 Expiiisoii Area

South East

South Central

2 15.9

28.2

200.79 15.55

18.89 9.31

South \N( ‘S.

TOTALS

1.4 PLANNING HORIZON

164.6

1 0264

82.3 82.3

486.58 539.83

The general planning horizon for the municipal infrastructure components, considered in this report, is 25years, or until to a service population of approximately 11,000. The future development areas defined willfacilitate the 25-year planning horizon or more depending no actual growth rates.

CAssociated GLOBAL PFRSPLCIIVF.Engineering LOCAL FOCUS.

AreaDescription

Estimated Benefitting Areas

Total Future ExistingDevelopable Area Development Development

1-3


Town of Slave Lake

1-4:rJ(]G3982\OOadvei-v ‘dv’so ryOl UO_dv’e\deveropnient chares\2Ol6.updateivt_2O1S1 1 23_drfl.docx


I I

IT

OW

NO

FSL

AV

ELA

KE

EX

IST

ING

AN

DF

UT

UR

EL

AN

DU

SEA

RE

Asw

TH

:NT

c:J

NL

.1:T

S

!ZE

JRE

LO

WD

EN

S

CO

MM

ER

OA

L

.7R

EtV

y(

_______

-R

EIN

DU

STR

IAL

EN

.R

DM

EA

LE

SE

.SS

FU

tRE

HIG

HE

RoE

ssR

ss:-

:%A

L

—P

U’R

E

SP

EC

IAL

STU

DY

AR

EA

JF

UT

UR

EP

UB

LC

SE

PA

RA

TE

DO

JTS

UH

WE

PUB

LIC

US

E(P

AR

KS

.R

EC

RE

Ath

A..

—T

D-?

.’.

BO

UN

DA

RY

——

CA

TC

I”.’

E%

UP

€AD

€SaG

HA

tCR

S

NC

iPS

IEE

P

FIG

UR

E1-

1-


REPORT

-

.a

2 Previous Levy By-Laws2.1 GENERAL

In keeping with the philosophy that developments should pay their proportionate share of the costs ofmunicipal infrastructure systems, which benefit the development, the Town of Slave Lake, initially passedBy-Law No. 16-1994, which outlined levies applicable against developments within the Town, for facilitiesconstructed by the Town prior to 1994. These costs are no longer paid by the Town and will reach a 25-year useful life in 2018. These costs will only apply from 2016 to 2018 and will then be removed for ongoinglevy collection. In general, the Town does not want to continue to charge for items that do not remain aburden or may begin to require capital maintenance upgrades. The original costs and the pertinent 2016value of the various projects are shown by multiplying the original cost by the Non-Residential BuildingConstruction Price Index (NRBCIP). published by Statistics Canada and utilized by the Town.

2.2 PREVIOUS INFRASTRUCTURE DEBENTURES

Table 2-1 provides a summary of projects and costs, incorporated in By-Law No. 16-1994, that have beenpaid for and will not be consider for future collection after 2018.

Table 2-1Retired Debentures

1993 2016Base Cost Adjusted Cost

Water Treatment:$1,417,800 $3,133,100$1,700,000 Debenture

Water Transmission:$1,074,509 $2,374,500$1,288,380 Debenture

Water Storage & Pumping:$1,251,000 $2,764,500$1,500,000 Debenture

Sewage Treatment & Disposal:$2,085,000 $4,607 400$2,500,000 Debenture

SW. Drainage Basin:$131,263 $290,100$157,000 Debenture

TOTALS $5,959,572 $13,169,600

] GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE.Engneerlng I LOCAL FOCUS.

Item I Function

2-1


Town of Slave Lake

2.3 EXISTING SOUTH SANITARY TRUNK SEWER

The South Sanitary Trunk Sewer primarily serves development areas, south of Highway No. 2. Schedule“B” of By-Law No. 16-1994 originally identified the various components of the South Sanitary Trunk Sewerand prorated portions for debentures, and an Alberta Public Works, Supply and Services (APWSS) loanthat finalized the project. The APWSS loan is valid for a 25-year period (1993-2018) requiring repaymentbased on the loan value adjusted annually in accordance with an appropriate construction cost index asdevelopment proceeds in the benefiting area. After 25 years, the Loan Agreement expires and anyoutstanding payment is considered a grant.

In 2004, with the completion of the South Expansion Area Structure Plan. (By-Law No. 16-2004, adoptedJuly 20, 2004), the Gross Developable Areas for each of the identified areas of By-Law No. 16-1994changed and the Off-Site Levies for the South Expansion Area were revised. The costs to be recovered (in1993 dollars) have been identified in By-Law No. 16-1994 and are updated (to 2016 dollars, as perNRBCPI), in this report.

Town APWSS Town APWSSDebt Loan Debt Loan

Total

2016Dollars

MdLII Outfall $192,479 $906,385 $425,400 $2,033,000 $2,428,400

Lateral N/A

Southeast Lateral

Southwest Lateral;East of Sawridge Creek

Southwest LateralWest of Sawñdge Creek

$38,666 $182,077 $85,500 $402,400 $487,900

$11,226 $523,765 $245,800 $1,157,500 $1,403,300

$82,347 $387,773 $182,000 $856,900 $1038900

Total $424,718 $2,000,000 $938,700 $4,419,600 $5,358,500

The costs outlined above will only apply for recovery until 2018 and will then be removed for ongoingOff-Site Levy collection and loan repayment.

2-2

Table 2-2South Sanitary Trunk Sewer

1993 DollarsSection

Description

2016 Dollars

N/A NA N/A N/A

aseces1CG3ac,s, r1: C’j_ ,i—ie c1er‘,


REPORT

3 Water Supply Facilities3.1 EXISTING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM

Figure 3-1 provides an overview of the major existing components of the Town water supply system.

The previous levies that apply are as follows:

• The existing 1994 levies as discussed in Section 2 of this report.• The Town completed a number of upgrades to the water plant, as per the report entitled, “Town of

Stave Lake, Water Treatment improvements, Pails 1-3’, dated March 2000, to improve long termwater quality to appropriate Standards and Guidelines. This work was implemented over threePhases 1, 2, and 3, between 2003 and 2007 with provincial funding (approximately 40%).

• The 2000 Water Treatment improvement Study also recommended improvement of the disinfectionprocess and increased treated water storage. The Town received approval of Building CanadaFunding for this project, in 2009, and the project was completed in 2011. The total estimated cost ofThis project, in 2010 dollars, was $8,735,000, resulting in an estimated cost to the Town of$2,970,100, after grant funding.

Water projects completed in the past have all benefited the entire Town’s area and are recalculated inTable 3-1, on that basis:

Table 3-1Past Water Projects

I Facilities2016 Cost Benefiting Net Development

L_.h... (after funding) Developable Area Charge‘JJ-:’’ Treatment Piant (1993) $3,133,100 $3,050W Ira’ (1993) $2,374,500 $2,310Water Storage and Pumping (1993) $2,764,500 $2,690

1,026.4 haV..•• ‘ Upgrade Phase 1 (2003) $1,396,800 $1,360WTP Upgrade Phase 2 t2005) $842,900 $820WW Upgrade PhaseS (2007) $1,168,600 $1,130WTP . and LJv (2011) $3,374,900 $3,280

CAssociated‘ GLOBAl PERSPLCTIVF.

Engineering LOCAL FOCUS.3-1


Town of Slave Lake

3.2 FUTURE WATER SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS

The Town has future plans to improve the raw water supply to further improve the safety and reliability ofthe water supply.

3.2.1 Raw Water Intake

The Town has been increasingly concerned with the reliability of the raw water intake, due to seasonal lowlake levels and varying waler quality. The Town collaborated with the MD of Lesser Slave River and theSawridge First Nation, as a Tn-Council to guide wild fire recovery efforts, after 2011, with one of themandates to improve the regional water supply. This project was defined through this collaboration and isanticipated to start construction, in 2017. The majority of the project is being support by regional recoveryfunding, due to the far reaching benefits for all parties. At this time, the overall project is anticipated to cost$18,500,000, with $17,000,000 of allocated funding. The remaining SI 500000 will be the Town’s directcost, as the primary benefitting party.

The Off-Site Levy for the raw water intake improvements is:

— $1500000 = S5O00= $1 460/haNet Developable Area 1,026.4 ha

3.3 FUTURE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

The report entitled, Town of S/ave Lake, Water Treatment /mprovements, Paris 1-3”, dated March 2000,also analyzed the existing and ultimate water distribution system. The analysis revealed several fire flowdeficient areas, within presently developed areas of lhe Town. The Town has not made a commitment toalleviate the suggested watermain replacements and/or upgrading. The ultimate plan for the future waterdistribution system was developed and this plan will be utilized to identify water main sizes and locations forvarious areas. Each developer will be required to develop the water distribution system within theirrespective areas and in accordance to the ultimate plan. The cost of the water distribution systemrequirements will be borne by the developments.

3.4 SOUTH EXPANSION AREA STRUCTURE PLAN

A water servicing concept was included in the South Expansion Area Structure Plan. It is anticipated thatthe proposed ASP area will be serviced by two pressure zones. Part of the proposed development will beserviced by the existing system, Zone 1. A new system, or Zone 2 will service all parcels of the expansionhigher than 600 metres. Zone 2 will feed back to Zone 1, at key locations, requiring pressure reducingvalves to prevent Zone 1 from experiencing too much pressure.

The area around and west of Sawnidge Creek (South West Area) will require a new booster pump station,at an estimated cost of $750,000 (year 2016 dollars). The project will likely not be eligible for financialassistance.

3-213CE.3cv szry1 J3 a!voeJeyeopenL z’iarges1O’ ,nca:e : Ii.


3 - Water Supply Facilities

r—-—_-

The Off-Site Levy for the South West Area of the South Expansion area for future waler supply facilities is:

$750,000 — = —. $75000 —

= $4 550/haNet Developable Area 164.6 ha

The area east of Sawridge Creek (South East Area) will require a new pumphouse, at an estimated cost of$1,250,000 (year 2016 dollars). The project wilt likely not be eligible for financial assistance.

The Off-Site Levy for the South East Area of the South Expansion Area for additional water supply facilitiesis:

$1.25Q000 == $5,780/haNet Developable Area 215.9 ha

Figure 3.2 provides an overview of the future water system needs, as outlined above,

Associated GLOBAl PERSPLCTIVE.Engineering LOCAL POCUS.

3-3


Town of Slave Lake

3-4I. JD’:r -n — :1. es2n D6aavsorjc I r,O - !p-1Ln Icnar-p:-A-ij IF -_UF ]F’jF)t_-•,J’’ II 3&i’ dx


INT

AK

EN

4DP

UM

C-

SE

WA

TE

RT

RE

AT

)4E

%T

_IT

EM

S‘4

5and?

INT

AB

LE

)

‘S

“-I;

WA

TE

RT

RA

NS

MIS

SIO

NM

AIN

—(f

tEM

2IN

TA

SL

E)

Ada.d

1.T

OW

NO

FS

LA

VE

LA

KE

DE

VE

LO

PM

EN

TC

HA

RG

ES

UPD

AT

E

OV

ER

VIE

WO

FM

AJO

RE

XIS

TIN

GC

OM

PON

EN

TS

OF

TO

WN

SW

AT

ER

SUPP

LY

SYST

EM

EG

E’J

D

EX

IST

INGC

-

EX

IST

IhG

‘C14

MM

S•I

ST

I.Z.

EJi

SM

LS

SO

SM

AiN

2SY

-C

‘.IC

RC

H.

I I g I S

SJT

hR

ES

ER

VO

IR—

[rE

M3

INT

AB

LE

)

FIG

UR

E3-

1-


RA

WW

AT

ER

LIF

EA

ND

INT

AK

EA

PP

RO

XI5

Bs

WD

EW

AT

ER

IIT

EM

SIN

TA

SLE

T

BO

OS

TE

RS

TA

flO

NN

CT

EM

9!N

TA

BL

E)

N

—;

Li’

i

EX

IST

ING

WA

TE

RT

RE

AT

ME

NT

PlA

NT

N

EX

IST

ING

ST

OR

AG

E—

NR

ES

ER

VO

IRA

ND

LWr

—-1-

N

NS

t

S I I gI g f S

A

TO

WN

OF

SLA

VE

LAK

ED

EV

EL

OPM

EN

TC

HA

RG

ES

UPD

AT

E

OV

ER

VIE

WO

FFU

TU

RE

WA

TE

RSY

STE

MN

EE

DS

LE

GE

ND

•FA

CiL

ITY

IMP

RO

’JE

ME

NT

S

EX

IST

PG

FA

t—

,

ExIS

rIN

GF

EE

O€R

IMIN

ES

TIN

GT

RA

NS

MIS

SR

MA

IN

UT

UR

ER

AW

WS

TE

RT

RA

NS

IAiO

NIN

SCA

LE

=1

25.

NC

IEM

BE

R20

16

_______ FI

GU

RE

3-2

/

PU

MP

STA

TIO

N-

-—

(IT

EM

70IN

TA

BL

E)

Efl

IIIE

fl(


REPORT

4 Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities4.1 EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM

Figure 4-1 provides an overview of the major existing components of the Town’s wastewater system.

The previous levies that apply are as follows:

• The existing 1994 levies, as discussed in Section 2 of this report.• Upgrades since that time were based on the Town’s Sanitary Sewer Master Plan, completed in

2000.• The north trunk sewer upgrade was completed in 2001, and an Off-Site Levy for this project was

formalized, during the 2004 Development Charge Review.• The Town then completed an upgrade to Lift Station C and West Trunk Sewer in 2007, which was

included in the 2009 Development Charge Review.

Past sewer projects, current costs, benefiting areas, and related levy rates are as provided in Table 4-1:

Table 4-1Past Sewer Projects

8 Dsposal (1993i

North Trunk Sewer (2001)’ 8 Street N.E.to Sawridge & 6 Avenue N.E.

South Trunk Sewer(1993)

Entire South & East 2(550.9 ha)

Southeast (215.9 ha)

Southcentrai & Southwest(192.8 ha)

Southwest (164.6 ha)

West (205.2 ha)

West (205.2 ha)

Associated &LOBAI PERSPCCT!VF.Engineering LOCAL FOCUS.

Project Description 2016 Dollars

$4.60;

$2,966,500

Benefiting Area

EotLr Town (1026.4 ha)

North & West (440.8)

M.:,’n Outfall $2,428,400

$487,900

$1,403,300

Southeast Lateral

Southwest Lateral(East of Sawridge Creek)

Southwest Latealof Sawridge Creek)

Lift Station “C” (2007)

West Trunk Sewer (2007)

Rate

$4,480

$6,730

$4400

$2,260

$7,270

$6,310

$13,430

$4,750

$1,038,900

$2, 757.200

$974,800

4-1


Town of Slave Lake

4.2 FUTURE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

In October, 2009, AE prepared the report entitled, Town of Stave Lake, Wastewater System AssessmenL”The wastewater treatment system for the Town is three (3) aerated lagoons. The system has reached itstheoretical design capacity; however, the effluent quality has remained well within Alberta Environment andParks’ (AEP) license requirements. The report concluded that the existing wastewater treatment system iscapable of producing AEP acceptable effluent for up to 10 years, with some minor upgrades, but will requiresignificant upgrades to meet the ultimate needs. The report recommended further evaluation of thewastewater treatment system to be conducted prior to the approval renewal and future upgrades gauged,based on effluent quality based limits.

In 2014, Associated Engineering completed a Water Quality Based Effluent Study (WQBES) report, andthen in 2015, completed a supplemental study. The results were reviewed with AEP, at a meeting on April27, 2016. Associated Engineering evaluated the existing lagoon and various upgrade options, andcompleted a report entitled. “ Wastewater Improvement Conceptual Design Report”, in October 2016, whichoutlines a proposed lagoon upgrade strategy.

The estimated capital cost of the planned improvements is $13,500,000, including: cell rehabibtation,upgrade of the existing aeration, addition of a Submerged Attached Growth Reactor (SAGR), and outfallimprovements. The project has been approved for 66% grant funding, under the Building Canada Fund.

The Off-Site Levy for the wastewater treatment system improvements is:

$4 590 000 $4 590 000=

= $4470/haGross Dev&opable Area 1,026.4 ha

4.3 FUTURE SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

It is assumed that the extension of the Town’s local sanitary sewer collection systems will be completed bydevelopers, as required. The Off-Site Levis are only considered for the major system that service largeareas and remain the responsibility of the Town.

The Town completed a Sanitary Sewer Master Plan, in 2016, which provides a frame work for ongoingsystem upgrades to address existing capacity issues and future capacity.

Table 4-2 provides an overview of the sanitary sewer improvements, and Figure 4-2 provides an overviewof the future wastewater needs as outlined.

4-21 CO_a& e\dev&ome’M :haresOOl6_vpaaievt_2D16l 123 &1I dOc


4 - Wastewater Treatment and Collection Facilities

ProjectDescription

Du Difl lFLIs f Hvy 83—- -• nu.i Tovn

Lift jOT •!trQ!,li -m —;-rw !WI

t.-on E:-rnt For, p’jir: R p ,r:n’ at-serves Nunh

y ‘D’’ and ( s’:--m, ri •-r, n: — :t’rV1. C,ntraI

Table 4-2Sanitary Sewer improvements

2016Dollars

Si U0 1)00

$1 2: coo

53,933.200

BenefitingArea

I .L-.:4 h.

2052 ha

7 ha

Rate

-.7(1

$3 .270

$5 940

$36,740

GLOUAI PERSPLCTIVE.Engineering LOCAL FOCUS.

4-3


Town of Slave Lake

4-4p v00fi3%2\OO advservces2OO6dv’sryV) I 00 sdv’ce\developr,’enl charnesI2OlS ujldatefll 20161 I 2 lilt lIo


WE

STT

hU

NK

SE

WE

R(I

TE

M18

INT

AS

tE)

SIA

ST

EA

TE

RT

RE

AT

ME

NT

NE

YII

INT

AS

tEI

7I

-U

rE

LIF

TC

(IT

EM

171W

TA

BL

E)

——

NG

RT

HT

RU

NK

)FrE

M-

13IN

TA

BL

E)

D

-.

U

I B-

SA

WR

IDG

E

-EA

SrT

RU

NK

SEW

ER

-S

OJ

TNT

RU

MC

SEIN

EB

1ITE

M1

3,1

41

5er

1SIN

TA

BL

E)

C—

Efn

ee’t

’g

A’.T

OW

NO

FS

LA

VE

LA

KE

DE

VE

LO

PME

NT

CH

AR

GE

SU

PDA

TE

EX

IST

ING

OV

ER

VIE

WO

FM

AJO

RE

XIS

TIN

GC

OM

PON

EN

TS

OF

TO

WN

’SW

AST

EW

AT

ER

SYST

EM

LE

GE

NC

EXS

iNG

FA

CIU

W

EX

IST

ING

GV

Ifl’

ER

UN

KS

EY

t

EX

IST

ING

FOR

CE

MA

JN

F;G

UR

E4-

1

zII

——

—


‘IIf;!

jI:

_________

r-J-

/--

IF

OR

CE

MA

INIn

EN

21IN

TA

BL

E)

I, -

SA

tCd

0

—I—

ST

AT

ION

EA

NO

FOR

CE

MA

IN(E

Y22

INT

AB

LE

A

TO

WN

OF

SLA

VE

LAK

ED

EV

EL

OPM

EN

TC

HA

RG

ES

UPD

AT

E

OV

ER

VIE

WO

FT

HE

FU

TU

RE

WA

ST

EW

AT

ER

NE

ED

S

GRATWJRUNK

SE

WE

RIM

PR

OV

EM

EN

TS

9

/

-7S

F

LIFT

StA

TIC

-

-A

SS

TE

AT

ER

EA

TU

EN

T-r

.—L

9E

pS

EI

AJ4

OP

MA

SE

1/

JPG

RA

OE

SI

ITE

MIS

INL

3E

.

OU

TFA

LL

SE

WE

R(I

TE

M20

INT

AB

LE

)

—E

AS

TF

OC

SIN

IftE

M,

IRU

NK

23

INT

AS

tE)

LE

-5E

.ND

•FA

CIL

ITY

IMP

RO

VS

ME

NS

EX

IST

PC

AO

LT

Y

EX

IST

NS

5qA

WT

RU

NK

SE

ER

EX

iST

ING

FOR

CE

MA

JN

FO

RC

EM

AN

IMP

RO

VE

ME

IrS

‘S

LE

125

NO

VE

MB

ER

2O

1

________ FI

GU

RE

4-2

-


REPORT

- a-—

5 Roadway SystemsThe Town of Slave Lake maintains a roadway classification system generally consistent with the definitionsfor arterial, collector, and local roads, contained in the “Geometric Design Standards for Canadian Roadsand Streets”; a manual published by the Transportation Association of Canada.

In the hierarchy of roadway classifications, the principle function of arterial roads is to provide for theefficient movement of people, goods, and sewices between the primary traffic generation areas of acommunity. Typically, arterial roadways are designed as relatively free-flowing facilities, intersected byother arterial or major collector type roadways, and provide no direct access to individual properties. Arterialroadways are generally considered to be a greater benefit to the Town at large than directly to individualdevelopments. This does not, however, negate the responsibility of the individual developers fromcontributing their proportionate share towards the cost of these arterials.

The Town of Slave Lake completed a Transpodalion Master Plan Update, in 2008, which defines theassociated costs and timeline horizons for various roadway improvements. The critical improvementsdefined by the plan relate to the Highway 2 intersections, Main Street and extensions to accommodatedevelopments. It is assumed that the roadway system extensions will be developed by developers or beassessed on an individual basis and specific levies established, if the Town develops portions or requiredroad systems. The Town has and will continue to define specific levies for Highway Access Improvements,as deemed appropriate during development planning.

AssDciated GIQUAI PERSPECIIVF.Engineering I LOCAL FOCUS. 5-1


REPORT

n.

6 Stormwater Drainage SystemsManagement of stormwater is an important component in the development of a community and must behandled effectively to preserve and promote the general health, welfare, security, and economic well beingof the public. With Sawridge Creek basically intersecting the Town of Slave Lake, the overall stormwatermanagement system for the Town is composed of numerous minor drainage concepts (local storm sewerand overland flaw).

One existing levy does apply to the west area for $175,600. This project was completed prior to 1994 andentailed a large drainage channel to convey water from 8 Street SW to Caribou Trail, improving drainagewithin southwest Slave Lake.

Stormwater management is assumed to be limited to within each development’s drainage basin. Runofffrom proposed developments is generally limited to pre-development rates and costs associated with thedevelopment. The minor stormwater management systems are considered the responsibility of eachdeveloper.

Stormwater management facilities are required in all future development areas to reduce site runoff topredevelopment rates. The development of stormwater facilities that are sized to service a minimum of30-40 ha is strongly encouraged. In addition, stormwater management facilities could be incorporated inopen space or undeveloped areas. The Town is currently completing a Stormwater Master Plan that willdefine a basis for future improvements and development needs, which may result in future levies.

CAssociated GLOBAL PFRSPFCTIVI.Engineering LOCAL FOCUS. 6-1


REPORT

-

7 SummaryThe Off-Site Levies, as described, are summarized in Table 7-I for use from 2016 to 2018. Table 7-1outlines the following:

• Past and future water and wastewater project costs that have or will be completed by the Town ofSlave Lake to benefit the areas, as defined, for a total current value of $44,000,000.

• The proportioned existing and future development areas that benefit from the improvement.• The proportioned cost for existing and future development areas that benefit from the improvement,

which demonstrates $23,900,000 benefits for existing developments and $20,000,000 benefits forfuture developments.

• The relative charge per development hectare is provided and distributed for each futuredevelopment area.

The review has identified a number of projects the Town of Slave Lake does not have any furtheroutstanding debentures for or that will reach the defined 25-year useful life, in 2018. The South SanitarySewer is included in these projects that will reach a 25-year cycle, at which time, the future APWSS loanpayment will be forgiven and any outstanding funds deemed as a grant. Table 7-2 provides a summary ofthe remaining Off-Site Levies that will apply from 2018 and beyond.

Associated :: GLOBAL PFRSP[CJIVE.Engineering LOCAL FOCUS. 74


Tab

le7-1

:O

ff-S

ite

Lev

yC

har

ges

Sum

mar

y20

16U

pdat

e

DE

VE

LO

PM

EN

TA

RE

A

NO

RT

HW

ES

T{C

EN

TR

AL

EA

ST

EA

ST

2S

OU

TH

SO

UT

HS

o_T

N(S

ou

tni

EA

ST

OE

’.T

RA

L.E

ST

NE

TD

EV

EL

OP

AB

LE

AR

EA

fa’

INF

RA

ST

RU

CT

UR

EE

ST

IMA

TE

Dan

dD

evel

oped

Cal

cula

ted

236€

2062

357

736

64€_,]

_,

9J

282

8686

co

M:0

NE

NT

SC

OS

TB

enef

itin

gA

rea

Co

stB

enef

it0’

1j’6

UN

DE

VE

LO

PE

DP

OR

TIO

NO

PN

ET

DE

VE

LO

PA

BL

EA

RE

Aha

’E

xis

tin

gG

row

thE

xis

tin

gG

row

th44

.271

.80.

00.

0I

68.6

20

68

j189

82.3

48

65

8P

AS

TW

AT

ER

SU

PP

LY

FAC

ILIT

YP

RO

_C

TS

I1

WaI

e’T

’eat

mer

’’°a

ntI

WT

P)

$3133190

5398

486.

6S

‘64—

900T

i3E

5e3

S3,0

50$

3.05

05

3,05

0-

I:1

:5:

50

05

0$

3050

27.a

:e’”

”ro

”ss

ion

S2

37

46

CC

5399

4866

12499C

)$

125700

52310

$2310

S2.

310

5232

$1310

S232

$73’D

13

.‘.,,:

erst

ora

ge&

Pum

pin

g$2764500

5398

4866

S1454000$1,J

IO.6

00$

2590$

2.6

005

2690

69j5

2650!

2.6

500

26

00

3.‘

Z°-°

hate

$1

,39

0,8

00

5398

4866

5734700$

662290$

1,36

0$

1,

$1,

360

1,36:5

1.3

6015

13

60

01360

5.‘

JP-P

has

e2

$84

2.90

05398

48€6

$44

3,40

0$

399,

600

$82

082

0$

820

582

05

820

820

$82

06

‘,“J°

-Ph

ase

l$

1,1

68

,60

05

39

848

6.6

$614700$

654000

S1,

130

S1

,13

0$

1130

$‘1

301

8130

$‘‘

3H2

7.‘

1°7

ese

”ow

4U

V$

33

74

90

05358

48

66

S‘““5:2:28:::::

S0:J

:3280

$3280

S210

32%

$2280!

32

60

FU

TU

RE

WA

TE

RS

UP

PL

YF

AC

ILIT

YP

RO

JEC

TS

8;,

,e’I

nla

kel

mp

rcvem

ent

S1,

500.

000

5398

486.

6$

789.

000

$71

1.19

0$

1.46

0$

1,46

0$

1.46

0S

‘46

0$

45S

Oro

l’E

xpan

sion

Are

a9

Boo

s1er

Sta

tion

Gos

ant’

$75

0,00

082

.3823

537

5.00

0S

375.

000

$4,

550

,3

‘L

.--’

ci1

’,o

n.c

ou

rnP

eser

.Jcr

.S

‘r.:

:::

151

200.

8$

87,5

00$

1,16

2,50

25,

780

.P

AS

TW

AS

TE

WA

TE

RT

RE

AT

ME

NT

(WW

T(

SC

OL

LE

CT

ION

PR

OJE

CT

Sis

a,v

ag

e’”

ea’m

erJ

&D

Iaposa

:S

48214C

C5398

486.

6$

2,42

3,30

0$

2.18

4.29

0$

4460

$4,

480

$4,

480

54s:S

48:

$4.

480

$4

48

0t2

lro

”'i”

Tru

Ik’.

!a,,

2,26

4,56

03948

11

60

S2,1

85.9

005

780190$

6.73

0S

61305

5730

So’x

2T

runt

Sew

er‘3

Main

Z,’

S2

42

4,4

00

18

03

37

06

$79

4.90

0S

1,63

3.60

0$

4,45

0A

4A

0’S

4,4

45

4,49

0S

44

90

14

Soix

hea

stL

ater

A$

487900

75’

2008

$3

42

86

$45

3.80

0$

2260

S2

26

075

So,

nnw

esl

Lat

eral

- Eas

tof

Saw

rid

gere

ek

$14

033C

C9

16

101.

2$

666,

800

$73

6.60

0S

7270

$7

27

05

:210

16S

outh

wes

t:a

lera

l-W

est

0’

Saw

ridg

eC

reek

$I

U38

900

623

82

3S

619500

S5

19

50

0$

6.31

05

31

0Il

Lift

Sta

ton

C’

$27

61,2

0’)

1334

71.8

S1792200

S90

5,10

0$

13,4

30$

13430

l8W

est

Tr,

rkS

t,-,

er

$926800

1334

71.8

$63

3,70

0S

341,2

00$

4,75

0$

4,75

0F

UT

UR

EW

AS

TE

WA

TE

RT

RE

AT

ME

NT

(WW

T)

&C

OL

LE

CT

ION

PR

OJE

CT

S

19R

V.’

,”rn

peo

’en

ien

ta‘‘s

s9..::

:87

3,8

4866

$2,

414,

100

12,1

76,0

90$

4,4

70$

47

CS

4,4

70$

-S

-4.

470

S4

47

0-

206t’

Sa’S

ew

erl

-lw

yhte

ast

$58

6,20

05398

486.

6$

30

8,4

00

1277,9

00$

570$

570$

I’Z

$-

S-5

570$

5701

5705

2lo

iflS

tato

n’C

’To

rce,n

ain

S61

2.00

01

33

471

.8$

436,8

00$

235,2

00$

3270$

-$

327C

J$-

$-,S

--

$-5

-

fljt

Sta

t’o.i

”E

”undro

rcanain

$1,

400.

000

19

14

M2

$1,

137,

500

S26

25C

2S

5940

S5.

940

1-

S-

S-

2-

-£

-S

-23jL

,811a1’o

n’a

n,3

orc

tnain

$1,2

75,

34.7

0,0

$1,275,$

-$

-$

-$

-S

-S

-5

-

-

1.

-

PA

ST

ST

OR

MS

EW

ER

PR

OJE

CT

S

‘J%

.”.

1ra

nage8as,

n$

250,

100

133.

47

18

$18

8.60

0$

01,6

00$

8426

514”

TO

TA

LS

S44,0

00,

S23

.900

,900

$20,0

00,0

00

$-

38,2

%$

58210

$-

$-

$30

.020

$34,0

60$

372001$

38

15

0

TO

TA

LO

PF

aIT

EL

EP

ER

AR

EA

$1,6

91,

$-

$2.

058.

000

$7.

641

0501S

704,

$3,8

62,

$20

-1

C


Tab

le7-

2:O

ff-S

ite

Lev

yC

harg

es

Sum

mar

yP

endin

g2018

Updat

e

INF

RA

ST

RU

CT

UR

EC

OM

PO

NE

NT

S(I

tem

No.

)

ES

TIM

AT

ED

CO

ST

(201

65)

‘E

RS

FA

CIL

ITY

PR

OJE

CT

S

xis

4jg

_Q

rwP

Cal

cula

ted

Ren

ef,

tng

Pro

po

rtio

nin

gU

nd

evel

op

edan

dD

evel

oped

Are

as

Ben

efit

ing

Are

aC

ost

Ben

efit

xia

WI

Are

aC

har

ge

44.2

71.8

0.0

UN

DE

VE

LO

PE

DP

OR

TIO

NO

FN

ET

DE

VE

LO

PA

BL

EA

RE

A(h

a)

0.0

ijoon

—la

sf

82.3

448.

58

27

,C

.C

45

e’

51

39

68

43

05398

4865

S73

4.70

05

Z$

13

60

$‘360$

13

60

1-

3&

5S

117:5

‘30:5

‘380

S:‘

,‘E

-Phase

2$

842.

900

5398

4866

$44340053998005

82

0$

82

0$

820

S4205

820$

3215

628

60’,

.JP

-Phss

e3

$1

16

8.6

00

5398

4866

$61

4,70

0S

554.

000

$1,

130

$1.

130

,130

S13

0S

‘13

0S

1.13

05

1,13

07

wrP

Rese

vo

ir&

UV

$3

37

4,9

00

5398

486.

6$

1,0

8.0

00

S1,6

%.0

00

$3280

$3280

53.

280

S3.

280

53.

280

S3.

280

53,

280

FU

TU

RE

WA

TE

RS

UP

PL

YFA

CIL

ITY

PR

OJE

CT

S

aR

swW

aer’

a.’

e-”

7u

.e’e

’t$

15

00

00

05

39

648

6.6

S7S

Ei

$711100

714%

$1

.46

07

:‘

£1%

1S

‘486S

14

60

$S

oot,

Exp

ansi

onN

sa9

Boost

e;S

tati

on(S

op,I

aud)

$75

0,00

08

23

82.3

S3’5

,000

S3H

130

S4,

586

10P

um

pS

tati

on

(Sou

t,R

ese

nir

($

1.25

0.00

015

120

0.8

S87500

57151073

$5780

35780

PA

ST

WA

ST

EW

AT

ER

TR

EA

TM

EN

T(W

WT

)&

CO

LL

EC

TIO

NP

RO

JEC

TS

‘,

rin-.

Msi

n3248

16.0

$‘65

S7

60

70

0$

7’

S61

S6730

17I1

.5S

Imon

C$

2.1

51

20

01

33

4‘

8$

1,19

2,20

0S

965,

100

$13

.430

5¶3

430

bF

v,e

stT

runkse

wer

$97

4,80

01

33

418

$63

3,70

0S

341,

200

$4,7

%S

k750

FU

TU

RE

WA

ST

EW

AT

ER

TR

EA

TM

EN

T&

CO

LL

EC

TIO

NP

RO

JEC

TS

L’.a

s1e.’

,aterT

rea:E

pi1s4f9or:o

5313

40

58

$2

41

41

00

5.1

5300”

447o

42

’U

$4

47

0$

.S

-20

5\J

:1a’S

ew

srH

vy88E

ast

$58

6,20

05398

486.

6$

308,4

00$

27

7,9

00

75

70

$5

70

j$5

70

$-

S-

Ss:ls

5’zS

S7u

21.1

11S

tato

nG

Forc

en

in$

672.

000

13

34

71.8

$43

6,80

0$

235,

200

S32

70‘

S32

70$

-S

-22

Lif

tSta

tonE

”&F

or0

0m

ain

$14

00.0

001

91

444

.2$

1,13

7,50

05

251,

586

$5

94

0$

5,94

0S

-7

-S

-11

,L

’ftS

’a’o

”C

’tF

orc

erm

ie3

47

00

$121S

$-

$-

S-

S-

-5

--

IT

OT

AL

S1$

26.6

00,0

00$

18

,,0

00

$10,8

00,0

00

S2

57

9.3

$4

1.2

7D

$

TO

TA

LO

FF

-SIT

EL

EV

YP

ER

AR

EA

$1137.0

00J$

2%

4000t$

-{s

-

586

7,00

0

HS

13

0%

886,:

5‘3

:9:

Sr6

40 C


REPORT

• .-....+ -••_a—-——

8 RecommendationsFrom Associated Engineering’s review of Development Charges for the Town of Slave Lake, werecommend that:

• The Town of Slave Lake continue to assume responsibility for the construction of the municipalinfrastructure systems, which they deem to be of benefit to the Town at large. The remainingsystems will be developed, as a condition of the proposed development.

• The Town maintain its current philosophy that developments will be responsible for theirproportionate share of the cost of municipal infrastructure systems expansion through theassessment of off-site levies against all benefiting lands.

• The Town of Slave Lake implement the development charges, as summarized in Table 7-1 until2018; after which time Table 7-2 will apply.

• The Town maintain its existing philosophy that major road improvements be included at theDevelopment Agreement stage, as applicable.

• The Town maintain its existing philosophy regarding stormwater drainage systems, wherein thedevelopment industry is required to manage stormwaler, in accordance with AEP’s Guidelinesregarding stormwater release rates and the Town of Slave Lake’s Municipal Engineering Standardsrequirements.

Based on the above, we recommend that the Town consider the following:

• Update the current Off-Site Levy By-Law, as per the recommendations.• The Off-Site Levies be adjusted annually, based on the Edmonton Non-Residential Building

Construction Price Index, to ensure that the rates are consistent with the overall Town’s fundingrequirements.

• The Off-Site Levies be updated with actual project costs, as upgrades occur.

GLOBALEngineerIng LOCAL FOCUS. 8-1


Suit 2UO. Cc nincrvc [tact

• INtiCda 1 5i .11 itIclcplionc JSO 497.11100Icltcupii.r (7EV) .i24.1?5I

) k’ rr .,.. Miii c-iiiaiMti.oi,i,IccI:,w cii,,,-

. ‘c%S ii C t-: mu ICC,u:0,,— I—

-S

Rerer to: LI. RandaDirect Line: 780.497.4832E-mail: [email protected] File No.: 71155-0264

December 15,2016

Sent by entail: /auriegvlai’elake. cc,Town of Slave LakeP0 Box 1030Slave Lake, All TOG 2A0

Attention: Laurie Skrynyk, l)ircetor of Planning & l)evelopmcnt

Dear Mauarn:

Re: Off-Site Levy Bylaw Review and Policy

Further to our recent correspondence and our opinion of November 15, 201 Si we write to provideour comments regarding the Town of Slave Lake’s updated off-site levy review and to provide adraft off-site levy bylaw.

In preparing of this opinion, we have reviewed the 2016 Off-Site Levy Review prepared byAssociated Engineering, the Town’s template development agreement, Off-Site Levy Policy#C.d. 027 and Oil-Site Levy Bylaw #05-20 10.

We note that we were not provided with copies of any master servicing plans or studies that arereferenced in the 2016 0ff-Site Levy Review, and as such, are unable to provide any opinion onwhether these studies and analysis are supportive of the levy rates and conclusions raised in the2016 OtT-Site Levy Review.

We note that the Bylaw proposes to impose levy rates based on a per hectare basis. As well, theBylaw refers to levies for water, sanitary sewer and storm water.

A. BACKGROUND

We provided an opinion to the Town on November 15, 2015 providing advice on the Town’sauthority to collect levies and practice of waiving levies in the fire recovery zone. In that letter,we also provided the Town with our opinion regarding the Town’s Offsite Levy Bylaw #02-2010and the 2009 Development Charges Review prepared by Associated Engineering, which isattached as Schedule “A” to the Bylaw (the “2009 Report”).

It is our understanding that over the last 14-IS months, the Town has been working on anextensive review of its off-site levies. Council directed administration that to no longer impose

1t2240(179 DoCx,ij


and collect off-site levies for lots that have been developed in the past, rcgardless of whether theTown has collected levies in the past or not. As such, only ‘vacant undeveloped lots would heimposed the off-site levy.

With this direction in place, Associated Engineering has undergone and complete the 2016 Off-Site Levy Report, dated November 2016, in support of the levies to be charged.

In addition to updating the Tow’s oiT-site levy bylaw and supporting report, the Town is in theprocess of updating its off-site levy poLicy and procedures to address when deferrals andpayment plans lbr the levies would he provided. At this time, the Town has agreed to a monthlypayment plan to some developers using a fonu of development agreement.

IL DISCUSSION REGARDING OFF-SITE LEVY REVJEW

We have reviewed the 2016 Off-Site Levy Report, dated November 2016, prepared byAssociation Engineering (the “Report”). This Report should be attached to the new off-site levybylaw as Schedule ‘A” to the Bylaw.

‘11w Report addresses water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water systems and roadwaysin eight development areus. The Report indicates that there are no roadways that will covered bythe ofLsite levy model, that there are both existing infrastructure proecls and new infrastructureprojects for water supply, and wastewater treatment and collection, and existing infrastructureprojects for storm water. Some of the existing water supply and wastewater treatment andcollection projects will be 25 years old by 2018 and as such, will be removed from the off-sitelevy model. It is our understanding that these existing projects were included in the 2009 Reportand bylaw, and are a continuation of collect of levies for these projects.

The Report includes roles for 2017 and then revised rates for 2018 when these existing projectswill be removed from the off-site levy regime.

Based on our recommendations and opinion on November 15, 2015 on the 2009 Report,Associated Engineering addressed the following matters in this recent Report:

• The title was revised with reference to Off-Site Levy.

• Additional explanation to the definition of the benefitting area descriptions are includedthroughout the Report. This should help clarify that the levies are fairly proportioned toall development (existing and future) including consideration for residual benefit.

• The term “significant” Municipal Reserve was removed.

• i’he planning horizon is defined and hosed on the infrastructure system capacity andplanning studies. This is generally considered 25 years.

• The Report defined levies that will be carried until debentures are paid and the asset is 25years old. As per the discussion with Council, Council does not want to carry items thatare no longer a cash burden to the Town and may be near the end of useful life.

Il224c79D0CX,I)


-3.• Protect costs and status have been updated. The Report maintains the CPI increase,which has been the convention. ibis was to he consistent with the original 1994 By-lawand APWSS South Sanitary loan repayrnern obligations.

• The summary and recommendations arc revised to include a 2016 rate table and 2018 ratetable.

• The summary tables clearly show the existing development component and growthcomponent. which serves two purposes. First it shows fair allocation to all henefittingarea, and second defines the portion allocated to existing development that Council doesnot want to charge or will consider alternate revenue sources (i.e. rates).

Upon GUI’ review of the Report and in consideration of the revisions and comments above,it is our opinion that the Report is well drafted and addresses the concerns and issuesraised with the Town’s previous 2009 Report. As such, there are no further revisionsnecessary, in our opinion, to the Report to support the Town’s Off-Site Levy Bylaw.

C. I)ISCUSSION REGARDING OFF-SITE LEVY BYLAW

As discussed. we also cuclose with this letter a draft Off-Site Levy Bylaw. The enclosed draftllylaw follows our recommended “standard Ilirm” olOff Site Levy Bylaw,

We recommend that the Town periodically review both the substance imd the financial aspects ofthe Off-Site Levy Bylaw. For example, the substance of’ the Off-Site Levy should be revisitedevery 3 to 5 years in order to review what facilities and other Off-Site Infrastructure required dueto development ought to be included in any future levies; aiid the financial aspects of the Off-SiteLevy ought to be reviewed annually (ideally) to properly reflect any inflation or borrowing costsassociated with the Oil-Site Infrastructure that is the subject matter of the Bylaw.

In summary. the key points to consider when reviewing the enclosed draft Bylaw are:

• Development Region — Section 2.1(h) — the enclosed draft Bylaw has been drafted withthe intent that the Town would add as a Bylaw Schedule, a map or other illustration thatclearly depicts the full “Development Region” that is subject to the Town’s Off Site LevyBylaw.

• Consultation and Advertisements — we have added express statements in the enclosedBylaw that indicate that the Town has complied with the requirements of the MunicipalGovenin;ent .4cc and the Principles and Crileria for OfT Site Levies Regulation (e.g. seethe second and final paragraphs of the draft Bylaw recitals).

• Equitable apportionment and supporting reports — the enclosed draft Bylaw addsexpress statements that the levy is based upon equitable apportionment principles and thesupporting report that will illustrate the fairness of the levies (e.g. see the third paragraphof the Bylaw recitals and Sections 3 and 4).

• Assessment per Hectare — We note that the 2016 Off-Site Levy Review refers to thelevies being calculated on a net hectare basis that excludes lands that have previouslypaid an off-size levy, Municipal Reserve, Environmental Reserve and undevelopabic1(3224067’) D0CX.I


-4-lands. It is important that the bylaw and supporting reports be consistent as to how thelevies are calculated and collected.

Objects, Principles and Criteria — the enclosed draft Bylaw adds express objects.principles and criteria for the levy that are consistent with the Principles and Criteria forOff Site Levies Regulations (e.g. see Section 4).

• Time for Collection — the enclosed draft Bylaw provides that the Town can collect thelevies at the time of either Subdivision or Development (see Section 3.5) unless otherwiseagreed to upon. Subject to a written agreement (typically a Development Agreement)and the provisions of the Bylaw, the Off-Site Levy may he deferred Lintil or collected at aFuture date (see Section 5.4).

• Levy Calculation -- the enclosed draft Bylaw adds that additional technical reports maybe used to substantiate the Town’s levies (see Section 2.1(m)). 1-lowever, at present, thedrati levies are calculated as proposed in Schedule “A” of the Bylaw, including the ratefor 2016 and for 201%.

• Delegated Authority — the enclosed draft Bylaw provides that Council delegates theauthority to administer the Bylaw to the Chief Administrative Officer (see Section 5.2).This includes entering into Development Agreements and deferring or waiving theeolleelion of an Off-Site Levy.

• Accounting of Off-Site Levy — the enclosed draft Bylaw incorporates the provision thatthe Town will hold the monies collected from the levies in a separate account for eachtype of infrastructure and that such monies may be invested until required for theconstruction of the Off-Site Infrastructure (see Section 4.1(l)). We recommend that theTown have separate accounts for each Off-Site Infrastructure (water, sanitary sewer, andstorm water), and caution that such monies not be combined into one to ensure that themonies collected are used for the purpose they were collected for.

We trust the above has been of assistance. Should you have any questions or comments, pleasedo not hesitate to contact the writer directly.

Yours truly,

BROWNLEE LLPPer:

_.-, /

CLOJZNE l,’jz.NDAtJRI t

Attachment: Draft Off.Site Levy Bytaw

13114067’) OOCN.i


TOWN OF

rjSLAVE LAKE CATEGORY: AdministrationPOLICY ii. Cd. 027OWNER DEPT: PlanningCOUNCIL APPROVAL: November 1, 2016

POLICY STATEMENT:

TITLE: OFF-SITE LEVY

POLICY

The Town of Slave Lake will implement an Off-Site Levy Policy with the intent ofensuring that all new Development, whether by way of a development permit orsubdivision, pay the costs associated with the municipal infrastructure required for theDevelopment.

POLICY OBJECTIVES:

The objective of this policy is to

1. To recover the cost of infrastructure required for growth by:

using financing strategies that remain sustainable;

2. To create a transparent process by:

i. conforming with the Municipal Government Act:ii. providing opportunity for industry input into the levy and its administration:andiii. providing the Off-Site Levies and reserve account status to be part of theannual municipal financial audit of the Town of Slave Lake.

3. To create a clear and consistent process for the collection of the levies.

Brian Vance, Chief—

Administrative OfficerMop C/2cY6

Date

“WORKING TOGETHER, BUILDING A BETTER COMMUNITY’


CATEGORY; AdministrationPOLICY #: Cd. 027OWNER DEPT: PlanningCOUNCIL APPROVAL: Nov 1 2016

PAGE 2 of 7

TITLE: OFF SITE LEVY

PROCEDURE1.0 DEFINITIONS

1.01 Accessory Building

“Accessory Building’ means a building or a structure separate and subordinate tothe main or principle building, the use of which is incidental to that of the mainbuilding and is located on the same parcel of land.

1.02 Act

Act’ shall mean the Municipal Government Act, RSA 2000, C. M—26, asamended.

1.03 CAO

“CAD” shall mean the Chief Administrative Officer of the Town of Slave Lake, orhis authorized representative.

1.04 Council

“Council” shall mean the duly elected fown Council.

1.05 Developer

‘Developer” shall mean the owner of land or the person to whom a developmentpermit or subdivision approval has been granted.

1.06 Development

‘Development” shall mean:

(i) an excavation or stockpile and creation of either of them;(H) a building or an addition to, or replacement or repair of a building.and the construction or placing in, on, aver or under land or any ofthem;

“WORKING TOGETHER, BUILDING A BETTER COMMUNITY”


U.

,1

I k. ?

‘ /

1.07 Development Charges

“Development Charges” shall mean the costs assessed by the Town of SlaveLake against land developers for their proportionate share of the costs ofmunicipal infrastructure systems constructed by the Town which benefit thedevelopment, or re-development areas.

1.08 Development Charge Study

‘Development Charge Study” shall mean ‘Schedule A” of the current Offsite LevyBylaw.

109 Land Use District

“Land Use District” means those Districts established and defined in the currentLand Use Bylaw adopted by the Town of Slave Lake.

1.10 Main Building

“Main Building” means the main or principle building on a site, the use of which isthe main or primary use on the subject lands.

1.11 Municipality

“Municipality” shall mean the Town of Slave Lake.

CATEGORY: AdministrationPOLICY #: Cd. 027OWNER DEPT: PlanningCOUNCIL APPROVAL: Nov 1,2016

PAGE 3 of 7


PROCEDURE

(Hi) a change of use of land or a building or an act done in relation toland or a building that results in or is likely to result in a change inthe use of the land or building; or

(iv) a change in the intensity of use of land or building or an act done inrelation to land or building that results in or is likely to result in achange in the intensity of use of the land or building.

“WORKING TOGETHER, BUILD!NGA BETTER COMMUNITY”


1.12 Dif-Site Levy Bylaw

CATEGORY: AdministrationPOLICY # Cd. 027OWNER DEPT: PlanningCOUNCIL APPROVAL Nov 1,2016

PAGE 4 of 7


PROCEDURE

“Offsite Levy Bylaw” means a bylaw of the Town of Slave Lake where an off-sitelevy is imposed in accordance with the authority of the Municipal Government ActRSA 2000, c. M-26 as amended.

1.13 Re-developed Land

“Re-developed Land” shall mean land within the boundaries of the town of SlaveLake which has been developed upon.

1.14 Subdivision Area

Subdivision Area” shall mean that portion of the lands which are delineated andoutlined in the pertinent Development Agreement.

1.15 Use

‘Use” means a building or an area of land and the function and activities thereon.1.16 Use,Changeof

“Use, Change of’ means the conversion of land or buildings, or portion thereof,from one land use activity to another, in accordance with the permitted ordiscretionary uses as listed in each land use district.

1.17 Use. Intensity of

“Use, Intensity of” means the degree or scale of use or activity in relation to theamount of land and buildings associated with the use, amount of parking facilitiesrequired for the particular use or activity, etc.

1.18 Vacant Un-developed Land

Vacant Un-developed Land” means any parcel of land within the boundaries ofthe Town of Slave Lake where a development permit has not been issued fordevelopment and no development exists on the land,

“WORKING TOGETHER, BUILDING A SETTER COMMUNITY”


CATEGORY: AdministrationPOLICY 1/: Cd. 027OWNER DEPt PlanningCOUNCIL APPROVAL: Nov 1,2016

PAGE 5 of 7


PROCEDURE

2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

2.01 Town Council:

Approves the Off-site Levy Policy and any amendments thereto.2.02 Chief Administrative Officer (GAO):

Ensures the Off-site Levy Policy is implemented and followed.

2.03 Director of Planning & Development:

Ensures that off-site levies are collected, in accordance with Policy, prior to theissuance of a development permit or subdivision approval.

3.0 STANDARDS!GUIDELINES

3.01 In accordance with the current Off-site Levy Bylaw, the Town of Slave Lake willrequire the payment of an off-site levy prior to the issuance of a developmentpermit or subdivision approval.

3.02 Where the subject land is considered Re-developed Land, the Town will notimpose an off-site levy, regardless of whether an off-site levy had ever beencollected.

3.03 Where the subject land is considered Vacant Undeveloped Land within anyResidential land use district, an off-site levy will be required and will be triggeredby an application for a development permit for the Main Building on the subjectland. Development permit applications for Accessory Buildings or any other typeof development, as defined in this Policy, other than a Main Building, will nottrigger the requirement to pay an off-site levy.

“WORkING TOGETHER, BUILDING A BETTER COMMUNITY”


CATEGORY: AdministrationPOLICY #: Cd. 027OWNER DEPT PlanningCOUNCIL APPROVAL: Nov 1, 2016

PAGE 6 of 7


PROCEDURE

.4

3.04 Where the subject land is considered Vacant Undeveloped Land within anyCommercial, Industrial or Special land use district, an off-site levy will berequired; and will be triggered by an application for a development permit for theMain Building or a Change in Use or Intensity of Use on the subject and. Anyother type of development, as defined in this Policy, other than a Main Building ora Change in Use or Intensity of Use of the subject land, wifl not trigger therequirement to pay an off-site levy.

4.0 POLICY PROCEDURES

Subdivisions:

4.1 Upon receipt of a subdivision application, the Developer will be notified of therequirement to pay an off-site levy in accordance with the current Off-site LevyBylaw.

4.2 For subdivision applications, Administration will prepare a DevelopmentAgreement, in accordance with Policy Cd. 017 Cost Recovery or CostContribution of Municipal Infrastructure. The subject Development Agreementshall address the collection of off-site levies and shall be drafted in accordancewith the current Off-site Levy Bylaw.

4.3 Where the subject Subdivision does not require the preparation of aDevelopment Agreement, the requirement to pay an off-site levy shall be acondition of subdivision approval.

Development Permits:

4.4 Upon receipt of a development permit application for a Main Building on a VacantUndeveloped Land in any Residential district, the developer will be required topay an off-site levy prior to issuance of the development permit.

“WORKING TOGETHER, BUiLDING A BETTER COMMUNITy”


CATEGORY: AdministrationPOLICY II. Cd. 027OWNER DEPT: PlanningCOUNCIL APPROVAL: Nov 112016

PAGE 7 of 7


PROCEDURE4.5 Upon receipt of a development permit application for a Main Building or aChange of Use or Intensity of Use of the subject lands on a Vacant UndevelopedLand within any Commercial, Industrial or Special district; the developer will berequired to pay an off-sfte levy prior to issuance of the development permit,4.6 Administration will calculate the off-site levy required utilizing the current Off-siteLevy Bylaw as follows:

4.6.1 Referencing the Figure 1 Map of the Development Charge Study,determine the catchment area the subject land falls within.

Once it has been determined which catchment area the subjectland falls within, refer to the annually adjusted Table 7.1 -Development Charges Summary Table of the Development ChargeStudy. This Table will provide the per hectare levy for eachcatchment area in Figure 1.

4.6.3 Determine the size of the subject land in hectares. Multiply theparcel size (in hectares) by the per hectare levy determined above.Goods and Services Tax (GST) is not added to an off-site levy.

4.6.2

“WORKING TOGETHER, BUILDING A BETTER COMMUNITY”


TOWN OF

-SLAVE LAKE

REPORT TO COUNCIL MEETING OF 7th FEBRUARY 2017

FROM: Laurie SkrynykDirector of Planning & Development

DATE: February 2, 2017

SUBJECT: Application to amend the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007Bylaw #01 -2017 FILE: 6013.90

LiZEEZEZZZZZZIThe purpose of this report is for Council to hold the required Public Hearing and giveconsideration to Second and Third Reading for Bylaw #01-201 7.

LZZ z:zzzzName of Applicant: Town of Slave Lake

Proposal: To amend various sections of the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007.

MunicipalGovernment Act:

Municipal PlanningCommission:

Referral Comments:

In accordance with Section 230(1) of the Municipal GovernmentAct, R.S.A. 2000, Town Council must give Bylaw #01-2017 FirstReading and hold the required Public Hearing prior to passing aresolution; however, since this application is brought forward byAdministration, Council may defeat the bylaw prior to holding aPublic Hearing. Bylaw #01-2017 received First Reading onJanuary 10, 2017.

The Municipal Planning Commission will review this applicationat its February 6,2017 meeting and as such theirrecommendation is forthcoming.

Bylaw #01-2017 was advertised in the Lakeside LeaderNewspaper for a period of two weeks. To date no verbal orwritten comments have been received.

[pjSCUSSION_-

________ ___

PlanningDepartment:

This bylaw is being introduced to Council for the required PublicHearing and consideration of Second and Third Reading. Bylaw#01-2017 represents the annual house-keeping amendments tothe Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 including areas identified by thePlanning Department as requiring amendment or clarification.

Bylaw #01-2017 Regulatory amendment to LUB 22-2007 - Laurie ... of 140

Report to CouncU Page 2 of 5Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 (Bylaw #01-201 7)February 2, 2017

Details with respect to each amendment will be provided in thesame order as presented in Bylaw #01-2017.

1. This amendment adds “Laundromat or Dry CleaningEstablishment’ as a permitted use to the C2 — SecondaryCommercial District. Currently this use exists in all othercommercial land use districts i.e. Cl, CiA, C3, C4 and C5Districts.

2. This amendment deletes section 14 (1) (d) entirely whichreads as follows:

(d) For the purpose of this section, the term “date ofissuance” means:

i) the date upon which the Development Permit with respectto a permitted use is posted on the Town’s website;

H) in the case of an appeal to the Subdivision andDevelopment Appeal Board, the date upon which theSubdivision and Development Appeal Board renders awritten decision approving the development permit; or

Hi) in the case of an appeal or leave to appeal to the Court ofAppeal, the fate, the judgement roll, or decision of the courtis tiled with the Court of Appeal allowing the development toproceed pursuant to an approved development permit.

This Section of the Land Use Bylaw with respect to “date ofissuance” was added in February 2015. The amendment wassuggested by Brownlee LLP; however the PlanningDepartment finds this section is not working well; especially ifthe Town experiences any difficulties or disruptions with theTown’s web page. As such, the Planning Department isrecommending removing this section. Sections 14 (a), (b) and(c) would remain in place, which adequately deal withvalidation dates and were the clauses utilized before thisamendment was made.

3. This amendment to Section 91, C4 - NeighborhoodCommercial District adds all the regulations with respect toresidential dwelling units in commercial districts. This includesregulations regarding minimum and maximum floor areas, aseparate access, location of the unit in relation to thecommercial space, parking requirements, minimumcommercial space requirements, outdoor amenity areas, etc.It was noted while approving a residential unit in the C4 Districtthat these regulations were not included in the District andshould be in place.


Report to Council Page 3 of 5Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 (Bylaw #01-201 7)February 2, 2017

4. This amendment adds clarification to Section 59 (e) byincluding the definitions for Soft Landscaping and HardLandscaping. This was an amendment suggested by Councilduring the adoption of the new Landscaping regulations inApril 2016 under Bylaw 4426-2015.

5. This amendment to Section 13 removes the MPCs ability togrant a variance to the driveway width. In accordance withlegal advice received from Brownlee LEP, the DevelopmentOfficer, MPC and the SDAB have no authority to grant availance on Town land i.e. Town’s boulevard. As the drivewaywidth is established within the boulevard area this amendmentis required to clarify the MPCs authority in this regard.

6. This amendment to Section 59 (3) (d) reduces the allowablefront yard hard landscaping for residential pie shaped lots.Right now the Land Use Bylaw allows 60% of the front yardarea of pie shaped lots to be hard surfaced i.e. driveway andsidewalks. The LUB also requires that 40% of the front yardarea is to be landscaped. Of that 40% front yard landscapedarea 25% can be hard landscaped.

Hard landscaping consists of non-vegetative materials such asbrick, stone, concrete, tile and wood, excluding monolithicconcrete or asphalt.

The Planning Department is recommending that for pieshaped residential lots only 20% of the front yard area be hardlandscaped thereby ensuring more vegetation in these frontyards. No change is being suggested for other standardresidential lots (i.e. not pie shaped) and will remain at 25% ofthe front yard landscaped area.

7. This amendment to Section 38 (8) clarifies that the drivewaydepth shall be measured from the property boundary 7.5 minto the property. This amendment also adds a minimumdriveway width of 3.0 m to ensure the driveway canaccommodate at least one vehicle.

8. This amendment to Section 29 clarifies that no person shalldevelop anything on Town own lands without first receivingprior approval and a development permit. This was arecommended amendment by our legal counsel suggestedwhen dealing with an encroachment onto public lands.

9. This amendment to Section 57 clarifies that barbed or razorwire cannot be used in any fence constructed in anyresidential district. This is a safety issue and is one that we


Report to Council Page 4 of 5Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw if 22-2007 (Bylaw #01-2017)February 2, 2017

have been enforcing for quite some time but has not beenofficially addressed in the Land Use Bylaw.

10. This amendment to Section 78 clarifies that barbed or razorwire cannot be used in any fence constructed in anycommercial district. This is a safety issue and is one that wehave been enforcing for quite some time but has not beenofficially addressed in the Land Use Bylaw.

11. This amendment to Section 95 clarifies that barbed or razorwire can be used in any fence constructed in any industrialdistrict. Currently there are quite a few industrial lots thatalready have barbed wire included in their fences.Landowners and business owners advise that the barbed wirediscourages vandalism and theft. The Planning Departmentfeels that barbed or razor wire in industrial districts should notbe an issue.

12. This amendment to Section 106 clarifies that barbed razor wirecannot be used in any fence constructed in any special district.This is a safety issue and is one that we have been enforcingfor quite some time but has not been officially addressed in theLand Use Bylaw.

13. This amendment to Section 63(2) (b) states that a satellitedish shall not be located on the roof of any building.Administration is recommending deleting this regulation asthere are satellite dishes located on roofs all over Town.

14. This amendment to Section 17, Table of Penalties, increasesthe fine for failing to comply with the rules relating to uses from$400.00 to $1,000.00. We have also added a daily fine forthe continuance of an offence. The Planning Department feelsthat the S400.0O fine is too small to encourage compliancewith the regulations of the Land Use Bylaw. Further it cost theTown money to have a prosecutor takes these fines throughthe courts and if the line is only $400.00 it is not worth hiring aprosecutor to defend the fine.

LbPWNSZ___ 1Option 1: Council could hold the required Public Hearing and give Bylaw

#01 -2017 Second and Third Reading.

Option 2: Council could defeat Bylaw #01-2017 on Second Reading.

Option 3: Council could give Bylaw #01 -2017 Second Reading and directAdministration to revise the Bylaw and bring it back for a secondPublic Hearing.


Report to Council Page 5 of 5Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 (Bylaw #01-2017)February 2, 2017

[EiaUeEiii!AOt

No Resource Impacts

I_POLICY IMPLICATIONS_______ ZNo Policy Impacts

COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY

This bylaw amendment was advertised for two weeks in theLakeside Leader prior to the public hearing being held.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL I

The Planning Department has no concerns with this applicationand recommends that Council give Bylaw #01 -2017 Second andThird Reading.

MOTION REQUESTED:

1. That Bylaw #01-2017 to amend various sections of the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007receives Second Reading.

2. That Bylaw #01 -2017 to amend various sections of the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007receives Third Reading.

Attachments

1. Bylaw #01-2017


1/

__________

Laurie Skrynyk Brian VanceDirector otPlanning & Development Chief Administrative Officer


BY-LAW #01-2017AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE BYLAW

TOWN OF SLAVE LAKE

A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF SLAVE LAKE IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA TOAMEND LAND USE BYLAW #22-2007.

Pursuant to the Municipal Government Act being Chapter M-26 of the Revised Statutesof Alberta, 2000, as amended, the Municipal Council of the Town of Slave Lake, dulyassembled, enacts as follows:

1. That Section 89 (2) is amended by adding “Laundromat or Dry CleaningEstablishment”.

2. That Section 14(1) (d) is removed entirely.

3. That Section 91 is amended by adding the following:

(13) Other Provisions

(a) In mixed residential and commercial buildings:

(i) The residential dwelling units shall satisfy the minimum floorarea requirements of Section 72(10);

(N) a minimum amenity area shall be provided in accordancewith the requirements of Section 72(12)(b);

(Ni) the residential dwelling unit shall have a separate and directaccess to the street; and

(iv) the residential dwelling unit shall generally be located abovethe ground floor level except that in the case of thedevelopment of a single business on a single lot, theMunicipal Planning Commission may allow the residentialsuite to be located on the same floor as the business. Theresidential and non-residential uses may be totallyseparated from each other or the Municipal PlanningCommission may approve a development with a connectingdoor between the residential and non-residential uses.Where a single building is approved for residential andcommercial use on the same floor any portion of the buildingused for the purpose of a residence shall be subject to theprovisions of Section 65 of this Bylaw, Standard DetachedResidential District Ri;

(v) That parking for the residential unit must be provided as perthe requirements of the Land Use Bylaw and that theresidential parking must be totally independent of andsecured from the commercial parking.

(vi) The parking for residential unit (indoor or outdoor) shall belocated to the rear of the development site and may not belocated closer than 21 metres to the front property line.

(vii) The minimum commercial area on the first floor shall begreater than 50% of the first floor area.


(b) Residential buildings shall satisfy the general rules for residentialdevelopment and the development requirements of Section 72.

(c) All areas of a parcel not covered by buildings, parking or drivewaysshall be landscaped to the satisfaction of the Development Officer.

(d) Refer to Part 7 of this Bylaw for the Special Provisions, which mayaffect development in this District.

(e) Refer to Part 8 of this Bylaw for the Parking and Loading Standards,which may affect development in this District.

(f) Refer to Part 9 of this Bylaw for the Sign Provisions, which mayaffect development in this District.

(14) Maximum Floor Area

2322 square metres (25,000 square feet) for retail stores not includingfood stores.

(15) Outdoor Living and Amenity Area

For residential apartments above commercial developments amenity areashall be provided in the form of balconies above the ground floor to amaximum of:

(a) For each bachelor or one bedroom dwelling unit — 18.5 m2(200 If)

(b) For each 2 & 3 bedroom dwelling unit —27.8 m (300 ft2)

4. That Section 59 (e) is replaced with the following:

(a) alternative forms of landscaping may be substituted for seeding orsodding, provided that all areas of exposed earth are designed aseither flowers beds or cultivated gardens. ‘Soft Landscaping”consists of vegetative materials such as trees, shrubs, hedges,grass, ground cover, wood chips and gardens. “HardLandscaping” consists of non-vegetative materials such as brick,stone, concrete, tile and wood, excluding monolithic concrete orasphalt.

ZIP

-

[


5. That Section 13 (7) (p) is replaced with the following:

The Municipal Planning Commission may grant a variance to the overallfront yard area landscaping requirements to a maximum of 10%.

6. That Section 38 (8) is replaced with the following:

Driveways shall be a minimum of 7.6 m in depth and a minimum of 3.0 min width. The driveway shall be developed on private property and shallbe a minimum of 7.5 m in depth measured from the property boundary,unless specific district provisions elsewhere in this Bylaw allow for areduced driveway depth/length. Driveways accessing lanes shall bedeveloped a minimum of 5.0 m in depth.

7. That Section 29 (1) shall is replaced with the following:

Except as provided in Section 10, no person shall develop anything onlands owned by the Town of Slave Lake unless the Town has provided itsprior approval and such development has also been authorized under theissuance of a development permit.


Any fence or wall constructed in residential districts shall not containbarbed or razor wire.

9. That Section 78(1) is replaced with the following:

All fencing in commercial districts shall be approved at the discretion ofthe Development Officer and must not contain barbed or razor wire.

10. That Section 95(1) is replaced with the following:

All fencing in industrial districts shall be approved at the discretion of theDevelopment Officer and may contain barbed or razor wire.


All fencing in special districts shall be approved at the discretion of theDevelopment Officer and must not contain barbed or razor wire.

12. That Section 63 (2) (b), which reads “not be located on the roof of any building” isdeleted entirely.

13. That Section 17 is amended by replacing the Table of Penalties as follows:

3


Offence

Fail to obtain DP

__________________

FaN to com_pjy with OP

-

_____

Failtoallowippection/hinder_Inspector—

Lightinu Offences- -

9(1) _faoshid --____

_9111 Exceed mountina height- jFaiI to recess on canopy_

Sign_Offences

43(4J(bJ

________________

-

________

43f4Jjb)

______________

AIL____

____________

A613L______

___________________

43f1) -43

a in Stall, a oa StaN Offences

_______

4Ojj) 1 FaiL to identifLstaNs through sigpage_____

______J_Stafls

used for Unauthohzed Puppe____40{lj jFaN to cornpjyy!th Parking Stall Standards40j1)

Land Use Rules Offences All Districts

1) alt Ris tin toUges9(1) I Every Da1jhe Offence Continues

$1000 —

_L$1 00/day

Low Density_Residential Offences

___________

iL2L Retairng Wall Exceed Height

_________

—

57(2)(iii) Retaining Wall not meet Separation-

______Reqirernent ________

—

57 Fall to c2p!yJh FencRuls

_____________

—

61 Hayçpphibited/restricted object

____________

55 Fall to comply with Accesso!y4pldin Rules30 Fail to Corn_ply with Corner Visibility Rules —

Commercial Offences

_______rFail

to screen mecharucal9(1) Fail to enclose garbage6 1(2)80(2)

of PenaltiesTable

9(1)9(1)17(2

Specified PenaltyFirst Offence

_______

$3000

___________

$3000

__________

$3000

$200$200$200

Fail to comply with Sign ApprovalPisplay 3rdPadAdversingSigptoockseto curbSign invisibWitytHangie

-

Sigpin road setback_Signnotpn privatepropertyUnauthonzeprojecton

_Damaae landscaping - -

Fail to cqpjy with Rules

$1000_____________$1000

__________

$500$500$300$300$200$500$200

$1000$1000

-- I$1029$1000

$1000$1000

$400$400$400$400

$1000$1000

4


That this Bylaw comes into effect upon the date of its Third and Final Reading.

READAFIRSTTIMETHIS DAYOF 2017A.D.


READ A SECOND TIME THIS DAYOF 2017A.D.

MAYOR CHIEF ADMINISTRATWE OFFICER

DAY OF 2017 A.D.


READ A THIRD TIME THIS

5


TOWN OF

rZSaSLAVE LAKE

REPORT TO COUNCIL MEETING OF 701 FEBRUARY 2017


DATE: February 1,2017

SUBJECT: Application to amend the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007Bylaw #03-2017 FILE: 6013.92

___

ZEEEZ]The purpose of this report is for Council to give Bylaw #03-2017 First Reading and to setthe date for the required Public Hearing.

[cZZZZZZZZiName of Applicant: Town of Slave Lake

Proposal: To amend various sections of the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007.



In accordance with Section 230(1) of the Municipal GovernmentAct, R.S.A. 2000, Town Council must give Bylaw #03-2017 FirstHeading and hold the required Public Hearing prior to passing aresolution; however, since this application is brought lorward byAdministration, Council may defeat the bylaw prior to holding aPublic Hearing.

The Municipal Planning Commission will review this applicationat its March 6,2017 meeting and as such their recommendation isforthcoming.

I DISCUSSION

PlanningDepartment:

This bylaw is being introduced to Council for First Heading and toset the date for the required Public Hearing. Bylaw #03-2017represents annual house-keeping amendments to the Land UseBylaw #22-2007 including areas identified by the PlanningDepartment as requiring amendment or clarification. Bylaw #03-2017 is the third house-keeping bylaw for 2017.

Details with respect to each amendment will be provided in thesame order as presented in Bylaw #03-2017.


Report to Council Page 2 of 6Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 (Bylaw #03-201 7)February 1,2017

1. This amendment adds new definitions as follows:

Administration was having difficulty explaining to developersand landowners the difference between types of accessorybuilding i.e. a garage vs. a shed. A garage, because it isconsidered permanent, is required to have a Real PropertyReport prepared after it is placed whereas a shed is not. Thisdefinition clarifies the difference between the two.

Currently there is a brewery in Town however the use has notbeen defined.

2. This amendment adds Craft Brewery & Distillery as adiscretionary use to the C2 — Secondary Commercial Districtand as a permitted use to the Ml — Light Industrial District andBi — Business Industrial District. Currently we have a CraftBrewery & Distillery located in the Ml District.

3. This amendment adds Brewpub as a permitted use to the Cl —

Central Commercial and C3 — Highway Commercial Districtsand as a discretionary use in the C2 — Secondary Commercialand Commercial Shopping Centre Districts. The PlanningDepartment is recommending the same uses as are currentlyassigned to Drinking Establishments for the variouscommercial districts.

4. This amendment adds examples of Accessory ResidentialBuildings i.e. garages, sheds, greenhouses, gazebos, etc. tothe definition for Accessory Residential Building.

5. This amendment adds regulations around a fire access area orfire lane. Currently the Land Use Bylaw does not require ithowever we have been addressing it when the Fire Chiefcomments on a site plan for a high density site. Theseregulations will ensure the developer plans for a fire accessarea or fire lane when they are designing their development.

6. This amendment adds the requirement to include the fireaccess area in the site plan for high density sites.

7. This amendment adds a new definition for Mobile, Modularand ATM Homes Sales. Currently the Land Use Bylaw has adefinition for Mobile Homes Sales however does not includemodular and ATM homes.

8. This amendment adds Mobile, Modular and RTM Home Salesas a discretionary use to the C3 - Highway Commercial Districtand as a permitted use to the Ml - Light Industrial and M2 -

General Industrial Districts.


Roport to Council Page 3 of 6Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 (Bylaw #03-2017)February 1,2017

9. This amendment deletes the definition for Mobile Home Salesas it is now included in the new definition i.e. Mobile, Modularand ATM Sales.

10. This amendment deletes Mobile Homes Sales as a use in theC3 — Highway Commercial, Ml — Light Industrial and M2 —

General Industrial Districts.

11. This amendment adds that a Secondary Suite can be locatedabove the first storey or at grade (i.e. attached to the side orrear) of a Single Detached Dwelling or a Detached Garage.This was the intent of the regulations however it was notexplicitly stated in Section 56 A (a) and (b).

12. This amendment removes the regulations for Home BasedBusinesses requiring the business owner to reapply after 5years. Previously and currently this is not the practice. Oncea Home Based Business is approved, applicants have notbeen required to reapply.

13. This amendment increases the amount of parking required forPlace of Worship. When reviewing and comparing ourregulations to other Land Use Bylaws it was noted that ourparking ratio was on the low side. The average is one parkingstall for every 5 seats and our Land Use Bylaw had oneparking stall for every 8 seats. This is not a substantialincrease but likely more representative of the average.

14. This amendment adds a definition for Autobody Repair &Painting. Autobody repair and painting used to be included inthe definition for Automotive Equipment and Repair Shops;however this use was recently added to the CiA — MixedCommercial Residential District. Autobody Repair andPainting is not a good lit for the CiA District and is a use thatfits better into industrial districts. As such, the definitions havebeen separated.

15. This amendment adds Autobody Repair & Painting as apermitted use to the Ml — Light Industrial and M2 — GeneralIndustrial Districts and as a discretionary use to the BI —

Business Industrial District. The Planning Department feelsthat the noise, dust, fumes, etc. associated with AutobodyRepair & Painting and sand blasting are uses that should onlytake place industrial districts.

16. This amendment clarifies the Outdoor Amenity requirementsfor high density developments, not including apartments. Theexisting regulations were vague and hard to interpret.


Report to Council Page 4 of 6Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 (Bylaw #03-201 7)February 1,2017

17. This amendment deals with hard surfacing requirements forresidential, commercial and industrial land use districts.

Residential

This amendment clarifies that hard surfacing is required of off-street parking, loading and unloading spaces and the access ifthe road or lane where access is gained from is also hardsurfaced. The only exception to this rule is in Gloryland i.e.R1C — Estate Residential District. In Gloryland, Pioneer DriveSW is developed to a rural cross section and some of it has apaved top. For this district only, 25 feet of the driveway,including the access thereto, must be hard surfaced. This isdue in large part to the fact that all of these lots weredeveloped long before the road was ever hard surfaced. Inaddition, in this area the residential driveways tend to be quitelong and as such the cost to hard surface the entire drivewaywould be very costly. Hard surfacing from the paved surfaceof the road and 25 feet of the driveway would ensure very littledebris would be carried onto the public road.

Commercial

This amendment clarifies that hard surfacing is required for allportions of the commercial site used for access, parking,loading or unloading.

Industrial

This amendment includes a requirement to hard surfaceparking, loading and unloading spaces located in front of theprinciple building as well as the access to the site if theaccess to the site is from a paved road. Administration isrecommending this change going forward as we have a fewindustrial sites that gain access from a paved road. We alsoknow that 25 feet of hard surfacing on these parcels does notreduce the carry of debris onto public roads. As such, we arerecommending for these sites, that the portions of the site infront of the building, that are not landscaped, be hardsurfaced.

18. This amendment adds definitions to the Land Use Bylaw withrespect to antennas and telecommunication facilities. Thesedefinitions come from the existing Antenna System SitingProtocol.

19. This amendment replaces the current regulations aroundcommunication towers. Industry Canada has sole jurisdictionto approve a telecommunication facility i.e. communication


Report to Council Page 5 of 6Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 (Bylaw #03-2017)February 1,2017

tower. The MPC, as the development authority, cannotapprove a telecommunication facility; but rather provides theapplicant and Industry Canada with a letter of concurrence ornon-concurrence with respect to the proposed facility. TheTown’s preferred requirements regarding the placement of atelecommunication facility are established in the AntennaSystem Siting Protocol.

20. This amendment adds regulations around the brightnesslevels for digital signs. These regulations are used in the Cityof Edmonton’s bylaws and are being recommended for ourLUB.

A foot-candle is the most common unit of measure used bylighting professionals to calculate light levels in businessesand outdoor spaces. A foot-candle is a measurement of lightintensity and is defined as the illuminance on a one-squarefoot surface from a uniform source of light. A Nit is a unit ofvisible light intensity, commonly used to specify the brightnessof a cathode ray tube or liquid crystal display computerdisplay. The higher the Nit spec the brighter the display.

21. This amendment adds definitions to Part 9 for a Foot-candleand a Nit.

[dWoi

In accordance with Section 230(1) of the MGA Town Council mustgive Bylaw #03-2017 First Reading and hold the required PublicHearing prior to passing a resolution. However since this is theTown’s application, Council may defeat the Bylaw at First Readingor may direct Administration to make further revisions beforeadvertising the Bylaw for the required Public Hearing.

L1fAZE1liZZJZNo Resource Impacts

[PoTiOYMpucATloN

No Policy Impacts .

[COMM UNICATIONS STRATEGY IBylaw #03-2017 will be advertised for two weeks in the LakesideLeader prior to the public hearing.


Report to Council Page 6 of 6Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 (Bylaw #03-2017)February 1,2017

{RECOMMENDA11ONTOCOUNCII

The Planning Department has no concerns with this applicationand recommends that Council give Bylaw #03-2017 First Readingand schedule the required Public Hearing for March 7, 2017.

MOTION REQUESTED:

1. That Bylaw #03-2017 to amend various sections of the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007receives First Reading and the required Public Hearing be scheduled for March 7,2017.

Attachments

1. Bylaw #03-20172. Research Information is available in digital form only due to the size of the

spreadsheet.


_______________

—--< -‘

Laurie SkrynykOU Brian VanceDirector pf Planning & Development Chief Administrative Officer



TOWN OF SLAVE LAKE



1. That Section 3 is amended by adding the following definitions:

“GARAGE” means an accessory building or part of a principle building designedand intended to be used for the storage of motor vehicles. A Garage isconsidered a permanent structure.

“CRAFT BREWERY & DISTILLERY” means an establishment where beer,wine, or alcoholic spirits are produced on site and are for retail sale; however arenot to be consumed on site. The facility must be appropriately licensed by theAlberta Liquor and Gaming Commission.

“BREWPUB” means an establishment that produces ales, beers, meads, hardciders and/or similar alcoholic beverage to serve on-site. Sale of alcoholicbeverages for off-site consumption is also permitted in keeping with Provincialregulations. Service of brewed beverages must be in coniunction with theservice of food. Brewpubs may not produce more than 15,000 barrels ofbeverage (all beverage types combined) annually. The facility must beappropriately licensed by the Alberta Liquor and Gaming Commission.

2. That Sections 89 (3), 100 (2) and 104 A (2) are amended by adding “CraftBrewery & Distillery”

3. That Sections 87 (2), 89 (3), 90 (2) and 92 (3) are amended by adding“Brewpub”.

4. That Section 3 is amended by replacing the following definitions:

“ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING” means a building separate andsubordinate to the main building, the use of which is incidental to that of the mainbuilding and is located on the same parcel of land. Accessory ResidentialBuilding must not be used as a dwelling unit unless a Secondary Suite —Detached Garage has been approved. Accessory Residential Buildings includesuch things as sheds, garages, greenhouses, gazebos, etc.


Any Row House, Town House, Fourplex or Apartment Building that exceeds aheight of two (2) storeys shall provide a fire access area. The fire access areashall be a firm and level and shall be accessible from a municipal road byemergency response equipment.


The fire access area shall be a length equivalent to at least 75 percent of the twosides of the building, one side of which shall be the longest face of the building.

The fire access area shall not be less than 4.27 m (14 ft.) in width and not morethan 3.05 m (10 ft.) from the building.

No buildings, vehicles or other obstructions shall be placed or be allowed in a fireaccess area. The fire access area shall be signed to the satisfaction of theDevelopment Authority.

The space for manoeuvring and circulation of vehicles on the parcel shall besufficient to ensure that vehicles do not drive onto roads, other than fire lanes, oronto adjacent parcels when manoeuvring and circulating, except where aneasement is registered for these purposes against the title of the adjacent parcel.

6. That Section 60 (2) is amended by adding the following:

Location and size of fire access area.

7. That Section 3 is amended by adding a definition for Mobile, Modular & RTMHome Sales.

“MOBILE, MODULAR & RTM HOME SALES” means a development used forthe sale of new mobile, modular and RTM homes and the sale of ancillary partsand accessories. May include the placement of mobile, modular and RTM showhomes on site for display/staging purposes.

8. That Section 90 (3), 100 (2), and 101 (2) are amended by adding “Mobile,Modular & ATM Homes Sales”.

9. That Section 3 is amended by deleting the definition for “Mobile Homes Sales”.

10. That Section 90 (3), 100 (2) and 101 (2) are amended by deleting “Mobile HomesSales”.

11. That Section 56 A (a) and (b) is amended by replacing with the foflowing:

(a) “Secondary Suite — Attached above Grade” where the Secondary Suite islocated above the first storey of a Single Detached Dwelling or DetachedGarage;

(b) “Secondary Suite — Attached at Grade” where the Secondary Suite is locatedat grade and is attached to the side or rear of a Single Detached Dwelling orDetached Garage;

12. That Section 58 is amended by removing clause (12) as follows:

(12) A new Home Based Business may be approved for a period not greaterthan 5 years after which time the applicant must reapply.

13. That Section 39 (e) is amended as follows:

(e) Place of Worship 1 per 5 seating spaces9



“AUTOBODY REPAIR & PAINTING” moans a development where automotivebodies are repaired and/or painted. This use may include sand blastingequipment and services. Automotive Equipment and Repair Shops is a separateuse.

15. That Section 100 (2), 101 (2) and 104 A (3) is amended by adding “AutobodyRepair & Painting’

16. That Section 72 (12) is replaced with the following:

(a) Each dwelling unit in a fourplex, row house or townhouse shall have oneyard which serves as an outdoor living area for the occupants. This yardshall have a minimum depth of 7.5 m (25 ft.).

(b) Within the outdoor living area referred to in Section 72 (12) (a), there shallbe a privacy area with a minimum depth of 4.5 m (15 ft.) which shall becontained by a privacy fence at least 1.5 m (5 ft.) in height.

17. That Section 38(1) and (2) are replaced with the following:

1. In any Residential District every off-street parking, loading or unloading spaceprovided or required and the access thereto, (which includes the whole areacontained within Town owned land), shall be hard surfaced if the access isfrom a street or lane that is also hard surfaced. In the R1C — EstateResidential District, where the road is developed to a Country ResidentialStandard (i.e. rural cross section with paved top), the off-street parking spaceand the access thereto shall be hard surfaced. This includes the whole areacontained within Town owned land and a minimum depth of 7.5 m (25 ft.) onthe parcel measured from the property boundary into the property.

2. In any Commercial District every off-street parking, loading or unloadingspace provided or required and the access thereto, shall be hard surfaced ifthe access is from a street or lane that is also hard surfaced.

3. In any Industrial District every off-street parking, loading or unloading spaceprovided or required, located in front of the principal building, including theaccess thereto, (which includes the area contained within Town owned land),shall be hard surfaced if the access is from a Street or lane that is also hardsurfaced. Any other area at the rear or side of the principle building providedor required for parking, loading or unloading space need not be hardsurfaced, but shall be constructed with such surface that will minimizecarrying of dirt or foreign matter into a public right-of-way.

18. That Section 3 is amended by adding the following

“TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY” means a telecommunication tower,antenna, accessory building, fencing, equipment box, access area to thecompound/telecommunication facility and any other associated infrastructurerequired for the transmission of Radio communication.

3


“ANTENNA” means any structure or device used for the purpose of collectingor transmitting electromagnetic waves, including but not limited to directionalantennas, such as panels, microwave dishes, and satellite dishes, and omnidirectional antennas, such as whip antennas, but does not include cellularphones, cordless phones, taxi radios, or other similar personal devices.

19. That Section 13 (7) (m) is replaced with the following:

(m) notwithstanding the height provisions in any land use district in this Bylaw,the Municipal Planning Commission may issue a statement ofconcurrence or non-concurrence to the applicant and to Industry Canada,in accordance with the current and prevailing Antenna System SitingProtocol, with respect to an application for a telecommunication facility.

20. That Section 53 C is amended by adding the following:

All Digital Signs, Major and Minor, shall use automatic light level controls toadjust light levels at night, under cloudy and other darkened conditions to reducelight pollution, in accordance with the following:

Ambient light monitors shall automatically adjust brightness levels of thecopy area based on ambient light conditions. Brightness levels shall notexceed 0.3 loot-candles above ambient light conditions when measuredfrom the sign face at its maximum brightness, between sunset andsunrise, at those time determined by the Sunrise I Sunset Calculator fromthe National Research Council of Canada.

Brightness levels of the Sign shall not exceed 400 Nits when measuredfrom the sign face at its maximum brightness, between sunset andsunrise, at those times determined by the Sunrise / Sunset calculator fromthe National Research Council of Canada.

21. That Section 42 is amended by adding the following definitions:

“A FOOT-CANDLE” means a common unit of measure used by lightingprofessionals to calculate light levels in business and outdoor spaces. A foot-candle is a measurement of light intensity and is defined as the illuminance on aone-square foot surface from a uniform source of light.

“A NIT” means a unit of visible light intensity, commonly used to specify thebrightness of a cathode ray tube or liquid crystal display or computer display.


READ A FIRST TIME THIS

____

DAY OF

_____________

2017 A.D.

MAYOR CHILE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

4


READ A SECOND TIME THIS DAY OF

__________

2017 AD.


READATHIRDTIMETHIS DAYOF

__________

2017A.D.


5


TOWN OF

SLAVE LAKE

REPORT TO COUNCIL MEETING OF 7111 FEBRUARY 2017

LPUPoE

______ _____

The purpose of this report is for Council to give Bylaw #04-2017 First Reading and to setthe dale for the required Public Hearing.

__

1*Name of Applicant: Town of Slave Lake

The following isa list of properties affected by Bylaw #04-2017 as well as the proposedchange for each:

Legal LandDescription:

a) Plan 752 1046, Block 4A, Lot 1Condo Plan 962 1609Plan 112 5720, Block 3, Lot 2Plan 072 3114, BlockS, LotsPlan 122 0499. Block 42, Lot 1Condo Plan 162 2149Plan 162 4074, Block 41, Lot 34Condo Plan 952 4008

(115—11 Avenue SW)(201/205—12 Avenue SW)(309 —5 Street SW)(1581/1591 Main Street SE)(600 —6 Street SE)(605—6 Avenue SE)(701 —6AvenueSE(709 —6 Avenue SE)

Plan 4757 TA, Block 14, Lots 7, 8, 9 (801-809—6 Avenue NW)Condo Plan 972 2088 (612/616 — Main Street NW)

Proposal: To rezone the above noted parcels, as shown on Schedule “A”,“B” and “C” from R3 — High Density Residential District to R3A —

High Density Apartment District to facilitate a previous Land UseBylaw amendment i.e. creation of the new R3A District.


b) Plan 992 3252, Lot 1 (901 Caribou Trail NW)

Proposal: To rezone the new Emergency Services Facility, as shown onSchedule “D” from Ml - Light Industrial District to I — Institutional

FROM: Samantha Dyck

SUBJECT:

Assistant to Planning & Development

Application to amend the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007Bylaw #04-2017 FILE: 601393


District.

Bylaw #04-2017 Redistricting amendment to LUB 22-2007 - Laur... of 140

Report to Council Page 2 of 6Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw 4122-2007 (Bylaw #04-2017)January 18, 2017

Legal Land c) Plan 752 0055, Block 6, Lot Al (Main Street SE)Description:

Proposal: To rezone the above noted parcel located in front of the NorthernLakes College, as shown on Schedule “E” from Al — StandardDetached Residential District to UE- Urban Expansion District.

Legal Land d) Plan 2971 TR, Lot R53 (Along Sawridge Creek &Description: Plan 2971 TA, Lot A54 Flood Channel)Plan 1099 TA1 Block RW, Lot 72Plan 2971 TA Block 48, Lot R18NE ¼ of 25-72-6-W5NE ¼ of 36-72-6-W5

Proposal: To rezone the above noted parcels, as shown on Schedule “E”from UE- Urban Expansion District to E- Environment District.

Legal Land e) Plan 932 1376, Block 54, Lot 16PUL (Along Highway #88)Description

Proposal: To rezone berm along Highway 88, as shown on Schedule “E”from CDC — Council Direct Control District to E- EnvironmentDistrict.

Legal Land f) Plan 072 7463, Block 2, Lot 32MA (Springwood Park Estates)

Proposal: To rezone the above noted parcel, as shown on Schedule “F’located at the end of Springwood Park Estates along Highway 88from R2- Medium Density Residential District to P — CommunityDistrict.

Municipal In accordance with Section 230(1) of the Municipal GovernmentGovernment Act: Act, R.S.A. 2000, Town Council must give Bylaw #04-2017 FirstReading and hold the required Public Hearing prior to passing aresolution: however, since this application is brought forward byAdministration, Council may defeat the bylaw prior to holding aPublic Hearing.

Municipal Planning The Municipal Planning Commission will review this applicationCommission: at its March 6,2017 meeting and as such their recommendation isforthcoming.


Report to CouncilPage 3 of 6Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 (Bylaw #04-2017)January 18, 2017

____ ________________IL___

Planning This bylaw is being introduced to Council for First Reading and toDepartment: set the date for the required Public Hearing. Bylaw #04-2017represents amendments to the Land Use District Map that havebeen identif led by Administration over the past couple of years.

The following is a brief explanation as to the proposedamendments in the same order as presented in Bylaw #04-2017.

1. This amendment redistricts three separate apartment siteswithin the SW quadrant, as shown in Schedule A”. All ofthese sites are currently zoned Ba — High Density District andshould be rezoned to R3A — High Density Apartment District.

2. This amendment redistricts five separate apartment siteswithin the SE quadrant, as shown in Schedule “B”. All of thesesites are currently zoned R3 — High Density District and shouldbe rezoned to R3A — High Density Apartment District.

3. This amendment redisthcts two separate apartment siteswithin the NW quadrant, as shown in Schedule “C”. All ofthese sites are currently zoned R3 — High Density District andshould be rezoned to R3A — High Density Apartment District.

The R3A — High Density Apartment District was added to theLand Use Bylaw in 2014 however the individual apartmentsites were not rezoned to reflect the change. As Apartment isno longer listed as a use in the R3 District these sites need tobe rezoned.

4. This amendment redistricts the new Emergency ServicesFacility, as shown on Schedule “D” from Ml — Light IndustrialDistrict to I — Institutional District so that the Fire Hall mayoperate at this new location.

5. This amendment redistricts a strip of land along Main Street infront of the Northern Lakes College, as shown on Schedule “E”from Ri — Standard Detached Residential District to UE —

Urban Expansion District.

6. This amendment redistricts six parcels along the SawridgeCreek behind the College and along Highway #2 and #88 i.e.the flood channel, as shown on Schedule ‘E”. All of thesesites should rezoned from UE — Urban Expansion District to E— Environment District as they are in tact part of the ER andthe flood channel.


Report to Council Page 4 o( 6Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 (Bylaw #04-2017)January 18, 2017

7. This amendment redistricts one parcel along highway 1188adjacent to 13 Street SE, as shown on Schedule “E”, wherethe berm is developed. The parcel is currently UE-UrbanExpansion District and should maintain an E — EnvironmentDistncting.

8. This amendment redistricts a large parcel of MR inSpringwood Park Estates, as shown on Schedule “F”. Thesubject site is currently zoned R2 — Medium DensityResidential District and should be P — Community District.

OPTIONS 1In accordance with the MGA Council must give Bylaw #04-2017First Reading and hold the required Public Hearing before passinga resolution ; however, since this application is brought forward byAdminisiration, Council may defeat the bylaw prior to holding aPublic Hearing.

(_RESOURCE_IMPACTS

No Resource Impacts

[foL!cYL1cAnor’is -. - - INo Policy Impacts

[ëbMMUNICATIONS STRAtJ3

Notice of the Public Hearing will be advertised in the LakesideLeader for a period of two weeks. In addition, referral letters willbe sent to all of the affected property owners.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL

At this time the Planning Department has no concerns with thisapplication and recommends that Council give Bylaw #04-2017First Reading and schedule the required Public Hearing for March7,2017.


Report to Council Page 5 of 6Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw 1122-2007 (Bylaw #04-201 7)January 18, 2017

MOTION REQUESTED:

That Bylaw 4104-201710 amend the Land Use District Map of the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 by redistricting:

1. Plan 072 3114, Block 5, Lot 1, Plan 752 1046, Block 4A, Lot 1, Condo Plan 9621609, Plan 122 0499, Block 42, Lot 1, Condo Plan 162 2149, Plan 162 4074, Block41, Lot 34, Condo Plan 952 4008, Plan 112 5720, Block 3, Lot 2, Plan 4757 TA,Block 14, Lots 7, 8 & 9, and Condo Plan 972 2088 from R3 — High DensityResidential District to R3A — High Density Apartment District.

2. Plan 992 3252, Lot 1 from Ml — Light Industrial District to I-Institutional District.

3. Plan 752 0055, Block 6, Lot Al from Al — Standard Detached Residential District toUE - Urban Expansion District.

4. Plan 2971 TA, Lot A53, Plan 2971 TA, Lot R54, Plan 1099 TA, Block AW, Lot 72,Plan 2971 TA Block 48, Lot RiB, NE ¼ of 25-72-6-W5 and NE ¼ of 36-72-6-W5from UE — Urban Expansion District to E — Environment District.

5. Plan 932 1376, Block 54, Lot 16PUL from CDC- Council Direct Control District to 2— Environment District.

6. Plan 072 7463, Block 2, Lot 32MR from R2 — Medium Density Residential District toP-Community District.

receives First Reading and the required Public Hearing be scheduled for March 7, 2017.

Attachments

1. Bylaw #04-2017 and attached Schedules

Report PeØared by: Report Approved by:

/--\ KL.

bk Laurie- Assistant to Planning & Development Director pf Planning & Development


Report to Council Page 6o1 6Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 (Bylaw #04-201 7)January 18, 2017

Report Approved for Council by:

Brian VanceChief Administrative Officer


BYLAW #04-2017LAND USE BYLAW AMENDMENT

TOWN OF SLAVE LAKE



That the Land Use District Map of the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 beamended by re-districting as follows:

Plan 752 1046, Block 4A, Lot 1,Condo Plan 962 1609, and

Plan 112 5720, Block 3, Lot 2

from R3 — High Density Residential Districtto R3A- High Density Apartment District

As shown on the attached sketch plan marked as Schedule “Ar andforming part of this Bylaw.

2. That the Land Use District Map of the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 beamended by re-districting as follows:

Plan 072 3114, BlockS, Lot 3,Plan 122 0499, Block 42, Lot 1,

Condo Plan 162 2149,Plan 162 4074, Block 41, Lot 34, and

Condo Plan 952 4008


As shown on the attached sketch plan marked as Schedule “B” andforming part of this Bylaw.


Plan 4757 TR, Block 14, Lots 7, 8 & 9, andCondo Plan 972 2088


As shown on the attached sketch plan marked as Schedule “C” andforming part of this Bylaw.



Plan 992 3252, Lot 1

from Ml — Light Industrial Districtto I — Institutional District

As shown on the attached sketch plan marked as Schedule “D” andforming part of this Bylaw.


Plan 752 0055, Block 6, Lot Ri

from Al- Standard Detached Residential Districtto UE — Urban Expansion District

As shown on the attached sketch plan marked as Schedule “E” andforming part of this Bylaw


Plan 2971 TA, Lot R53,Plan 2971 TA, Lot R54,

Plan 1099 TR, Block RW, Lot 72,Plan 2971 TR Block 48, Lot R18,

NE ¼ of 25-72-6-W5, andNE ¼ of 36-72-6-W5

from UE — Urban Expansion Districtto E- Environment District

As shown on the attached sketch plan marked as Schedule “E” andforming part of this Bylaw.


Plan 932 1376, Block 54, Lot 16PUL

from CDC — Council Direct Control Districtto E- Environment District

As shown on the attached sketch plan marked as Schedule “E” andforming part of this Bylaw.



Plan 072 7463, Block 2, Lot 32MR

from R2 — Medium Density Residential Districtto P — Community District

As shown on the attached sketch plan marked as Schedule “F’ andforming part of this Bylaw



____

DAY OF

_____________

2017 AD.

MAYOR CF-flEE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

READ A SECOND TIME THIS DAY OF

__________

2017 AD.



_____

DAY OF

____________

2017 AD.

MAYOR CHIEF ADMINISTRA11VE OFFICER

T:601393 bylaw #04-2017


£0C,

C20IIc’J4-

0-JC,000CC.,’

F-—

too

N‘C

——

—.-

C—

—c

—0)

Ci

CC

0,0

.

CD

>—

—C.,,

0C

C0)0

)C

o

ox

ti

C0<

0——

0—

-.10

4C)

Va)‘CciU

)


Schedule B

Plan 122 0499, Block 42, Lot 1; condo Plan 162 2149; Plan 162 4074, Block 41, Lot 34 and Condo Plan952 4008 from R3 - High Density Residential District to R3A — High Density Apartment District

Plan 072 3114, BlockS, Lot 3 from R3 - High Density Residential District to R3A — High DensityApartment District


Schedule C

Plan 4757 TR, Block 14, Lots 7, 8, & 9; and Condo Plan 972 2088 from R3 - High Density ResidentialDistrict to R3A — High Density Apartment District


Schedule D

Ml

7/LPlan 992 3252, Lot 1 from Ml — Light Industrial District to I — Institutional District


Schedule E

Plan 752 0055,

Plan 2971 TR, Lot R53; Plan 2971 TR, Lot R54; Plan 1099 TR, Block RW, Lot 72;Plan 2971 TR Block 48, Lot RiB; NE ¼ of 25-72-6-W5 and NE ¼ of 36-72-6-W5 fromUE — Urban Expansion District to E — Environment District

Plan 932 1376, Block 54, Lot 16PUL from CDC — council Direct control District toE- Environment District

Block 6, Lot Ri from Ri — Standard Detached Residential District toUE — Urban Expansion District


Schedule F

D Plan 072 7463, Block 2, Lot 32MR from R2 — Medium Density ResidentialDistrict to P — Community District


TOWN OF

SLAVE LAKE

REPORT TO COUNCIL MEETING OF 7th FEBRUARY, 2017



SUBJECT: Application to amend the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007Bylaw #05-2017 FILE: 6013.94

Lipf!OsLZZ ZZZZZZTZZZZIThe purpose of this report is for Council to give Bylaw #05-2017 First Reading and to setthe date for the required Public Hearing.

JqpzzzzzzzzzzName of Applicant: IVW Holdings Ltd.

Landowner:

Civic Address:


IVW Holdings Ltd.

312— Balsam Road NE

Lot 31, Block 5, Plan 142 4862

Proposal: To rezone the above noted parcel from M4 — Small HoldingsIndustrial District to Ml — Light Industrial District in order to allowmore uses to operate on this site.


MunicipalDevelopment Plan:


In accordance with Section 230(1) of the Municipal GovernmentAct, R.SA. 2000, Town Council must give Bylaw #05-2017 FirstReading and hold the required Public Hearing prior to passing aresolution.

The subject site is within the Commercial/Industrial designationof the Municipal Development Plan and as such an amendment isnot required. .

.

The Municipal Planning Commission will review this applicationat its March 6, 2017 meeting and as such their recommendation isforthcoming.


Report to Council Page 2 of 3Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 (Bylaw #05-201 7)January 24, 2017

[biëUioFi ZZZZZ1Planning This bylaw is being introduced to Council for First Reading and toDepartment: sot the date for the required Public Hearing.

In 2014 the applicant was issued a development permit for theconstruction of an Industrial Shop with 10 bays. The building isconstructed and all of the bays are now being leased.

In order to be able to approve a broader range of industrial usesfor this site the applicant would like to rezone from M4 — SmallHoldings Industrial District to Ml — Light Industrial District. TheM4 District has a very limited list of permitted and discretionaryuses.

[oPt7&

In accordance with the MGA Council must give Bylaw #05-2017First Reading and hold the required Public Hearing before passinga resolution.

Lg.jtjZZZNo Resource Impacts

Epöllcviiü’TfoIWJZ3ZZIZI ZNo Policy Impacts

[ooMMUNICA11ONSSTRATEGYZ

Notice of the Public Hearing will be advertised in the LakesideLeader and on the Town’s webpage for a period of two weeks. Inaddition, referral letters will be sent to adjacent property owners.

LtTPc2MtCILZ1liJ

At this time the Planning Department has no concerns with thisapplication and recommends that Council give Bylaw #05-2017First Reading and schedule the required Public Hearing for March7, 2017.


Report to Council Page 3 of 3Amendment to the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 (Bylaw #05-201 7)January 24, 2017

MOTION REQUESTED:

That Bylaw #05-2017 to amend the Land Use District Map of the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 by redistricting Lot 31, Block 5, Plan 142 4862 from M4 — Small Holding IndustrialDistrict to Ml — Light Industrial District receives First Reading and the required PublicHearing be scheduled for March 7, 2017.

Attachments

1. Application2. Bylaw #05-20173. Location Map


L* :_____Laurie Skrynyk /

Brian VanceDirector of Planning & Development Chief Administrative Officer


Nr

mB

cD

iD=

ft

ft Di

C D C 1 ft N C z D ft -C C ft f-fl

-1a

Co

C

NJrioZ

Ui0

3%)S

t

r-

if-C

ftm r

DD

i>

-

7c

— o

11

U, p

ii

— oH

w oH

—

U,

H,

ft —

H :1’

H 0 0 N) o -t o D

-

Vp

H!

to SDH

o o C C r — o t —H

Ii

H H

H

—-I

—I

o-n

3H

i

-I’

‘C

‘4

-C

Dfl

a-

a 1 ft U,

U,

-w I,,

r Di 0-

0 ft U,

00 D Di C -I ft It

2 cn lZ

>0

rr

C 77-

r-.

N C 4n p t

xt

Hft

—N

Co

-CD

ft—

.—

00

—00

—I

ft -C C0

ftft a

ft-‘

AU

i ft -3 ft a a 0 ft -3

Hm

ro

-‘

C—

-.

C—

Di

U,

3;-

-I—>—

‘‘3

-‘0 to

‘3D

i

•1U

,

C-

—F

a0,I

,(“

to

ZT

h

S —I

0 Ii-

—0>

om

-D2

t.-

r ft_n

a1

>D

iH

—l

— HF

LC

In

— Sm

-r p.

2z

-i

C

•0 0 .1 -n 0 m C It -4 2 0

> -v -v r n -1 0 2

mO

2>

VI

-1 fl!

2-iO

m

m 20

OC m

m 20

-l > r’

Jf;

.J

0 0 —I

0L



TOWN OF SLAVE LAKE

A BYLAW OF THE TOWN OF SLAVE LAKE IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA TOAMEND LAND USE BY-LAW #22-2007.


1. That the Land Use District Map of the Land Use Bylaw #22-2007 be amended byre-districting as follows:

Lot 31, BlockS, Plan 142 4862

From

M4 — Small Holdings Industrial District

To

Ml — Light Industrial District

As shown on the attached sketch map marked as Schedule “A” and forming partof this Bylaw.



____

DAY OF 2017 AD.

MAYOR

READ A SECOND TIME THIS

MAYOR

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

DAY OF 2017 A.D.

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER


____

DAY OF 2017 AD.

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERMAYOR


Schedule A

A

\—t\\ — AX

At ._—ca r a—A\. .-“ a

/\—3\W.

\)7,,

:,c /\M2

/ /-. /

r )

it // /-•

Proposed Redistricting of Lot 31, Block 5, Plan 142 4862 located at 310Balsam Road NE from M4 — Small Holdings Industrial District to Ml —

Light Industrial District.


Location Map

Proposed Redistricting from M4 to Ml located at 310 Balsam Road NE on Lot

Bylaw #05-2017

31, Block 5, Plan 142 4862.


hid I PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIVISION NO. 48Bo\ 870. Hili I’rjir,c. :\Ilci(i Iic II)

Pliiiiic 781) 2’ H7, Lx 78(1 S i(,) Hill icc 877 S1 (iii ;\II’ciia ‘iiiV Ii)StI IS .I,.c:i

RECEIVED BY 11*January 12, 2017

JAN1 ZUl?

TOWN OF SLAVE LAKETown of Slave LakeMayor Tyler WarmanBox 1030Slave Lake, AD TOG 2A0

Dear Mayor Warman,

The Board of Trustees as well as myself, on behalf of our Transportation Department would like toextend our sincere appreciation for the support you have given us in our efforts to educate the publicabout traffic safety as it relates to school buses and the precious cargo that they carry. Our schooldivision is committed to ensuring that our students are transported in the safetest manner possible.

We note that the Slave Lake Peace Officers, Mark Becker and Brandon Gantz have been vigilant withmonitoring traffic around our schools including observance of school zone speed limits. We have had anespecially problematic bus route, T-01 with our Bus I260 and we have had their support and monitoringof student highway pick up and drop off.

We also want to thank you for supporting all of High Prairie School Division’s safety initiatives such asour Bus Stop Arm Camera Initiative which is intended to reduce/eliminate all illegal passing while aschool bus has it’s red lights flashing.

Your support is noticed, appreciated and valued.

Sincerely,

Tammy HenkelChair

Cc Laura Poloz, SuperintendentHarry Davis, Director of TranpsortationBoard of Trustees

½v1,,,i: W1 i?Mp/)i hiul mid mujiimi, 1(1 i/li IIILh t /m’i/

High Prairie School Division - Safety Initiatives - Thank yo... of 140

Canadian Association Of Oilwell Drilling Contractors2050 717-7 Avenue SW• Calgary, Alberta T2P 0Z3

Tel: 403-264-4311 • Fax: 403-263-3796

January 16, 2017gCIVtD VTI*

Mayor Tyler WarmanP0 Box 1030 JAN20 LflISlave Lake AR TOG 2A0

TOWN Of SLMDear Mayor Warman,

I am writing today to ask for your support of Oil and Gas Awareness Day in Alberta. As youknow, February 13th 2017 marks the 70th anniversary of the Leduc No. 1 oil discovery. Thediscovery at Leduc in 1947 would prove to be the catalyst for modern Alberta, unlocking theprovince’s conventional oil resources and driving Canada toward increased energyindependence.

Many Albertans are residents of our great province because they or their forbearers came toAlberta to seek new opportunities in the wake of the Leduc No. 1 discovery. Calgary andEdmonton owe their thriving populations to this development. The towns of Devon and SwanHills are a direct result of oil and gas workers moving to the surrounding area. From Lethbridgeto Grande Prairie, Alberta’s oil and gas industry has benefitted from the wellspring of talent andindustry knowledge created by the Leduc discovery. You could say that it created Alberta’sfamily business’.

The Alberta Urban Municipalities Association (AUMA) has submitted a resolution to theGovernment of Alberta on behalf of its members asking the province to honour the industry bydeclaring February l3’’ Oil and Gas Awareness Day in Alberta. In addition, the CanadianAssociation of Oilwell Drilling Contractors’ (CAODC’s) Oil Respect campaign has a petition withover 1,300 signatures supporting the initiative.

The CAODC and AUMA have championed this initiative with the Government of Alberta andhave seen some movement on that end, but we feel strongly about individual municipalparticipation. On behalf of our members, many of whom live in your communities, I am askingyou to place a proposal regarding Oil and Gas Awareness Day (February 13’, 2017) on yournext council meeting’s agenda. Each municipality will observe the event as they like, but webelieve that the time has never been more important to celebrate an industry that has given somuch to our province. For more information, please contact Jess Sinclair, a member of ourcommunications team, atisinclaircaodc.ca or 403-264-4311 Ext 108.With gratitude,

Mark A. Scholz, MBAPresident

CAODC - Request to Observe Oil and Gas Day February 13, 2017... of 140

Lisa Russell

From; Brian VanceSent: January 27, 2017 5:18 PMTo: Lisa RussellSubject: FW: LED PresentationAttachments: Town of Slave Lake Lightspdf: Schedule C-Street Lighting.pdf: Street Light Distribution

Tariffs.pdf

As correspondence for Feb 7 meeting. Include attachments.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: January-17-17 2:57 PMTo: Lisa RussellCc: Brian Vance; [email protected]: RE: LED Presentation

Hi Usa and Brian,

I have gathered all the requested follow up information from Council that came out of our LED presentation. If you haveany questions please feel free to call or email me.

1. What is the cost variance between invested and non-invested lights• Currently the Town has 132 lights on the invested rate and 708 on the non-invested rate. See attached,

‘Town of Slave Lake Lights’, breakdown of what you are currently paying for on a 30 day billing cycleand what you would be paying if all 840 lights were on the invested rate.

2. How many streetlights were replaced after the 2011 fires in the SE area of Town• 38 street lights were replaced after the fires

3. Average age of infrastructure within the Town of Slave Lake• Approximately 74% of Streetlights are 20 plus years with the majority of these lights being installed in

the 80’s. On the Non-Invested rate the Town is responsible to replace “End of Life” Streetlights• Approximately 70% of the Underground Cable is 40 years old which is well beyond the Manufactures

“cable life expectancy”. There is no way of foreca5ting when this cable will need to be replaced. Whenwe have a cable failure we look at how many times it has been sliced/repaired in the past and ease ofrepair (under a driveway or road) we then make a decision if we can fix it or if we need to replace itas “End of Life”. On the Non-Invested rate the Town is responsible to pay for ‘End of Life” Cablereplacement.

4. Cost for Solar LED lighting options• The cost to install a Solar LED light varies between $4,500 and $7,500 per light depending on what

option you choose (solar wrap or traditional solar panel, see pictures below)

jeI

ATCO Electric - Town of Slave Lake Lights - additional Infor... of 140

As I mentioned in our LED presentation we are doing our Davit (Steel Pole) inspections this year. Based on our 2016 datawe are suggesting that the Town of Slave Lake budget to replace 1% of failed streetlights (need to be replacedimmediately due to safety concern) in 2017 and 3.5% failed lights (no immediate concern can be replaced up to 2 yearsafter inspection) in 2019. Based on 840 lights within the Community we are suggesting budgeting for 8 lights this year,ballpark cost of $48,000.00 and 29 lights in 2019, ballpark cost of $174,000.00. If any bases or cable full during theinspection the cost of replacement would be above and beyond the ballpark costs provided.

I have attached the Streetlight Distribution Tariffs (Price Schedules) for both Non-Invested and invested for your reviewas well as a copy of Schedule “C”-Street Lighting which is applicable for any Franchised Community that is on theinvested rate. Schedule “C” outlines additional reporting/patrolling and tracking that ATCO would comply with andreport annually along with our Franchise Reports to the Town of Slave Lake. Most Franchised communities withinATCO Electric service territory have made the switch to the invested rate as they find it much easier to budget.The Distribution Tariffs can be found on our ATCO Electric website as wellhttp://www.atcoelectric.com/Rates/tariffs/Current-Tariffs

Please let me know if you need additional information or clarification.

Thanks again for giving us the opportunity to present some options to you folks.

Brian I will follow up with you in next month to see if there is any additional questions/concerns from Council.Talk soon,

Amanda MatternCustomer Service Supervisor Slave Lake & High Prairie DistrictATCO Electric Operations Division104 Birch Rd. j Slave Lake, AB TOG 2A0T. 780.849.7613 C. 780.843.9941 j T. 780.536.2203E.amandmattejpjatco.comwww.atcoelectric.com

The information transmitted is intended only for the addressee and may contain conldent:al, proprietary ano/or privileged material. Anyunauthorized review, distribution or other use of or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information is prohibited. II you receive thisin error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy this message and any copies.

From: Mattern, AmandaSent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 1:21 PMTo: Lisa Russell (hsa.russeljpsiaveiake.ca)Cc: Brian Vance (bji Hynes, SeanSubject: RE: LED Presentation

Hi Lisa & Brian,

Just wanted to drop you a line to let you know I am still working on gathering the data listed below. I hope to have therest of the information to you folks by next week.

Thank you,

Amanda MatternCustomer Service Supervisor Slave Lake & High Prairie District

2


Town of Slave Lake- Street Lights and Private Lights

Invested Streetlights

PNumber7ihts Size of Light Cost of Lights$208.0541 watt

88 watt

$2,855.82$312.76

$855.18_____$51.73

3___Wfltt 5.96_

Non-Invested Streetlights

--Number of Lights Size of Light Cost Of Lights If lights were invesled

533 fioo watt $9,881.82 $23,062.91148 150 watt $2,956,613.1819 t 250 watt ft$432.66 t$902.58

Invested Sentinel Lights

[iimber of Lights Size of Light [ Cost of Lights3 1döf$44.581 [ 150 watt $15.63_______9 j400 watt $175.75

Non-Invested Sentinel Lights

LNumbers of Lightsj Size of Light CostofLightsj If lights were investedj 8 [jqo watt $76.20 J $118.88

TOTAL UGHT COUNT: 840COST FOR CURRENT BILLING: $18,884.67TOTAL COST IF ALL LIGHTS WERE INVESTED: $36,238.68

5

10

667

18

1

100 watt$815.67

150 watt250 watt400 watt

A difference of: $17,354.01


Rige 33SCHEDULE “C”

Street Lighting

1) As set out in Article lic) of this Agreement, once all street lighting within the MunicipalService Area has been converted to the applicable Company investment option rate, theCompany agrees to provide the following services for street lighting within theMunicipal Service Area as part of its Core Services:

a) gjjs-ou_Ptrols: On a monthly basis, during the time period of September IS toMay the Company will conduct a “lights-out” street light patrol to identify lightsthat are not working. Formal street light patrols will not be conducted during thesummer months; however, normal reporting and replacement procedures will bemaintained.

b) lights-out: The Company will replace or repair a failed light identified in its patrol orreported by customers, within two (2) weeks. If the reported light is not replaced orrepaired within two (2) weeks, the Company will provide a two (2) month credit tothe Municipality based on the rate in the Distribution Tariff tar the tailed lights.Such two (2) month credit shall continue to apply for each subsequent two (2) weekperiod during which the same failed light(5) have not been replaced. The Companyagrees to use good faith commercially reasonable efforts to replace or repair:

i) failed street lights at critical locations; or

ii) failed Street lighting circuits at any location, as the case may be, as soon aspossible. The location of the critical street lights will be agreed to by bothParties.

c) Underground Breaks: As a minimum, the Company will provide a temporaryoverhead repair within two (2) weeks of an identified or reported outage.Underground breaks identified during the summer months of April 15th toSeptember will be repaired (underground) by October 31st of the currentsummer construction period. A permanent repair will be made by October 3ft ofthe next year if the outage is identified between the winter months of Septemberto April 15th

d) Street light Paintijg The Company will provide a regular street light “painting”patrol as part of its Street light inspection program, The Municipality may requestthat it participates in select street light inspection patrols and may review the resultsof the street light inspection program. Street lights that are identified as requiringimmediate work through the Street light inspection program will be re-painted byOctober 31st of the next maintenance season,

I,iit:iIs\ I in cf p,i H ty

Conpani’ L.ATCO Electric - Town of Slave Lake Lights - additional Infor... of 140

e) Street light Pole Test Program: Street lights will be tested at least every nine (9)years as part of the Company’s Pole Test Program. This program will identify polesthat need to be replaced and those that should be treated. This replacement andtreatment work will be completed by October 31st of the next summer maintenanceseason.

f) Street fight Patrols: The Company will include regular street light inspection patrolsas part of its inspection of equipment and lines, as specified in the Alberta ElectricalUtility Code.

2) On an annual basis, the Company wUl provide the Municipality with:

i) the number of “lights-out” identified from the street light patrols;

u) the number of temporary overhead repairs of street lights at year-end; and

iii) the number of permanent underground repairs of street lights made duringthe year.

Nlui,icq,Ii(y

Company


ATCO ElectricstrZ1

Availability• For System Access Service and Electric Distribution Service for all Points of Service throughout theterritory served by the Company, for street lighting.• Not available for prrvate lighting.

Price

Charges for service in any one billing period are the sum of the Customer Charge and Demand Charge,determined for each individual Point of Service.

Decorative Lighting (61 A)• For decorative lighting fixtures installed, owned and maintained by the Company.• The customer is responsible for the full cost ol installation.• Includes maintenance only.• Specific contracts may require customers to purchase and maintain inventory of decorative lamps ifthe customer’s lighting fixtures are not the same as the standard used by the company.

Decorative Lamps

Customer Charge Demand ChargeTransmission

- 0.033 ØfW/day

Distribution 40.70 /fixture/day 0.045 ØAN)dayService 4.46 0/fixture/day

-

TOTAL PRICE 45.16 ct/fixture/day 0.081 01W/day

Investment Option (61 8)• For lighting fixtures installed, owned, and maintained by the Company.

All Lamps

Customer Charge Demand ChargeTransmission

- 0.033 $*IdayDistribution $1.1 174 /fixtureiday 0.046 lW1dayService 4.46 0/fixture/day

-

TOTAL PRICE $1.1820 Ifixturelday 0.081 01W/day

ATCO Electric 2017 PBR Annual Filing (Interim Rates)Sl1eetl of 3

Approved in AUG Decision 21978-D01-2016 (Dated: December 23, 2016) Effective: 20170101Supersedes 201601 01The Company’s Terms and coodthons for Electric Distribution Sen/ice apply to all retailers and customers provrded with Systemand/or Distribution Access Service by the Company. The Terms and Conditions are avai’ahle at ATCO Electric ot9ces durrng nDrmalworking hours or on the website atcoelectriccom.


ATCO Electricstrei°X

Distribution Investment Option (61 C)• For customer owned and installed lighting.• For installation and maintenance of distribution facilities up to, but not including the customer ownedconductor serving the light fixtures.

• The Company may require that the Point of Service be metered and served on Price Schedule D21, ifthe load requirements change over time, or if loads that are not lighting oads are served from thesame Point of Service.

All Lamps

Customer Charge Demand Charge

Transmission- 0.033 /day

Distribution 63.73 Ø/fixturelday 0.048 ØiW/day

Service 4.46 Øffixture/day-

TOTAL PRICE 58.19 çUflxture/day 0.081 01W/day

No Investment Option (61 E)

• Available for new installations oniy.

. For lighting fixtures installed, owned and maintained by the Company.• The customer is responsible for the full cost of installation.• The customer is responsible for the full cost of replacement.a Includes maintenance only.

All Lamps


Transmission- 0.033 ØiW/day

DIstribution 40.70 0/fixture/day 0.048 çtAN/day

Service 4.46 0/fixture/day-

TOTAL PRICE 45.16 Øifixture(day 0.081 1fW!day

ATCO Electric 2017 PBR Annual Filing (Interim Rates)Sheet 2 of 3Approved in AUC Decision 21978-D01-2016 (Dated: December 23. 2016) Etfecive: 2017 Cl 01

supersedes: zoie 0101The companys Terms and Conditions (or Electric Distribution Sew/ce app(y to all retailers and custoniers erovided with Syslemand/or O}slrtut,cn Access Seivice by the Company. Tne Terms and Conditions are available at AltO Eleclrc orfices during normalworking hours or on the website VArw.atcoeeclric,00m.


ATCO ElectricStr

Application1. Price Option - the following price option may apply:

Idle Service (Option F)

2. Price Adjustments — the following price adjustments (riders) may apply.Municipal Assessment (Rider A)Balancing Pool Adjustment (Rider B)Temporary Adjustment (Rider G)interim Adjustment (Rider J)SAS Adjustment (Rider 5)

ATCO Electric 2017 PBR Annual Filing (Interim Rates)Sheet 3 at 3Approved in AUG Decision 21978-001-2016 (Dated: December 23, 2016) Effective: 201701 01

Supeisedes. 201601 01The Companys Teens and Condebons for Etectdc Distribution Service apply to all retailers and customers provided with Systemand/or Distribution Access Service by the Company The Terms and Co,idetions are available a: ATcO Eiectr:c offices during normalworking hours or on the websile ‘wnv atcoelectric.com.


ATCO fleetrEe Price Schedule D63Private Lighting Service

Availability

For System Access Service and Electric Distribution Service for all Points of Service throughout theterritory served by the Company, for sentinel lighting.

Price

Charges for service in any one billing period are the sum of the Customer Charge anddetermined for each individual Point of Service.

investment Option (63 A)

Demand Charge

For standard sentinel lighting fixtures installed, owned, and maintained by the Company


Transmission- 0.034 em/day

Distribution 28.59 0/fixture/day 0.026 ØiW/day


TOTAL PRICE 38.21 Øifixturelday 0.060 01W/day

Summer Village Option (63 B)• For standard sentinel lighting fixtures installed, owned and maintained by the Company• For seasonal use only (six month minimum period) by Municipal Corporations in summer villages.

This portion of the rate is closed


Transmission- 0.034 01W/day

Distribution 46.10 g/fixturefday 0.026 1W/day


TOTAL PRICE 55.72 Ølfixture/day 0.060 01W/day

ATCO Electric 2011 PBR Annual Filing (Intertm Rates)Approved in AUC Decision 21978-D01-2016 (Dated: December 23, 2016)

The Company’s mans and Conditions for Electric Distribution Service apply to all retailers and customers provided with Systemand/or Distribution Access Se,ce by the Company. The Terms and Conditions are ava,lable at ATCO Electric offices during normalworking hours or on he website vw..atcoelectric corn.

Sheet 1 of 3Effechve: 20170101

Supersedes: 20160101


ATCOnceivac Price Schedule 063

_____________

Private Lighting Service

No Investment Option (63 C)• Available for new installations only.

• For standard lighting fixtures installed, owned, and maintained by the Company.• The customer is responsible for the full cost of installation.• The customer is responsible for the full cost of replacement.• Includes maintenance only.


Transmission - 0.034 Øm/day

Distribulion 15.17 0/fixture/day 0.007 */day

Service 9.62 /fixture/day-

TOTAL PRICE 24.79 0/fixture/day 0.041 çtfiNlday

Metering Option (63 D)• For slandard lighting fixtures installed, owned, and maintained by the Company.• For service through the meter at the Point of Service.o This portion of the rate is closed.


Transmission - 0.034 0*/day

Distribution 30.35 0/fixture/day 0.026 0*/day


TOTAL PRICE 39.97 ffixture/day 0.060 iWIday

ATCO Electric 2017 PeR Annual Filing (Interim Ratesisheet 2 of 3Approved in AUC Decision 21978-D01-2016 (Dated: December 23, 2016) Effect?ve: 20170101

Supersedes: 2016 01 01The Company’s Terms and Conditions for Electric Distnbution Service apply to all retailers and customers provided wlh Systemand/or c;slritu! on Access Service by the company. The Terms and Contht,ons are ava :ab!e at Alto L-lec:ric offices during c:maworking hours or on the website wv.alcaeleclric.com


ATCO ElectricPrivate Ughting SeMce

Distribution Investment Option (63 E)• For customer owned and installed hghting.• For installation and maintenance of distribution facilities up to, but not including the customer ownedconduclor serving the light fixtures.

• The Company may require that the Point of Service be metered and served on Price Schedule 021, ifthe toad requirements change over time, or if toads that are not lighting loads are served from thesame Point of Service.


Transmission- 0.034 */day

Distribution 19.84 /fixturelday 0.026 */day


TOTAL PRICE 29.46 0/fixture/day 0.060 01W/day

Application

1. Price Adjustments - the following phce adjustments (riders) may apply;Municipal Assessment (ftder A)Balancing Pool Adjustment (Rider B)Temporary Adjustment (Rider C)Interim Adjustment (Rider J)SAS Adjustment (Rider 5)

ATCOLlectric 2017 PeR Annual Filing (Interim Rates)Sheet 3 of 3Approved in AUC Decision 21978.001-2016 (Dated; December 23, 2016) 201701 01

Supersedes: 201601 01The Company’s Te,ms and Conditions for Electric Distfibution Service apply to at retailers and customers provided with Systemand/or Distribulon Access Serv:ze by Inc Company. The Terms and Conditions are available at ATC0 Electric offices dur:ng norma:working hours or on the website vnwatcoelectrc cool.


regular meeting of council - 07 feb 2017

Documents