reforming government
DESCRIPTION
MJanagement EngineeringTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Presenter: Engr. Marvin Darius M. Lagasca
Professor: Jo B. BitonioME 215 Management of Change & Transition
![Page 2: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Osborne and Gaebler suggest that governments should:
1) steer, not row (or as Mario Cuomo put it, "it is not government's obligation to provide services, but to see that they're provided")
2) empower communities to solve their own problems rather than simply deliver services
3) encourage competition rather than monopolies
4) be driven by missions, rather than rules5) be results-oriented by funding outcomes
rather than inputs
![Page 3: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
6) meet the needs of the customer, not the bureaucracy
7) concentrate on earning money rather than
spending it8) invest in preventing problems rather
than curing crises 9) decentralize authority and 10) solve problems by influencing market
forces rather than creating public programs
![Page 4: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
A. Local Government Code of 1991
One of the main failures of the Weberian bureaucracy is it’s being too HIERARCHICAL & CENTRALIZED.
The 1991 LGC is a big step towards
DECENTRALIZATION & DEVOLUTION of power and function.
![Page 5: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Grounds for the LGC of 1991:“It is more efficient for local authorities to
administer said functions because they are in a better position to respond to diverse and changing local conditions; it promotes local democracy since local elected officials are now responsible for the delivery of such functions; and it is more equitable in the sense that local communities are more likely to get their due share of public services.” (Mila A. Reforma, 1998)
![Page 6: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Basic Functions Devolved:AgricultureHealthPublic WorksEnvironment & Natural ResourcesSocial Welfare
Personnel ManagementFinancial ManagementPlanning & Goal-Setting
![Page 7: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
B. PrivatizationPrivatization is founded on the principle that
“governments should steer, not row” and that "it is not government's obligation to provide services, but to see that they're provided".
Government should only come in areas where private sector is unwilling or unable to provide the goods and services in a market setting.
Strategy to reduce capital outlays and financial burden of government.
Part of the conditionalities of IMF and WB.
![Page 8: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
C. Build-Operate and Transfer (BOT) Law/ Public-Private PartnershipThis law allows the private sector to construct,
own, maintain, operate ,and manage infrastructure projects.
This opens the doors to active participation by the private sector in development/infrastructure projects of the government, such as roads, highways, expressways, public markets, ports, harbors, airports, industrial estates, solid waste management, telecommunications, and so forth.
![Page 9: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
D. Use of Alternative Mechanisms for Service Delivery/ NGOsThe inadequacy and ineffectiveness of
government in delivering basic services to the people have altogether led to the opening up of service delivery functions to NGOs and quasi-NGOs.
The absence of structural or bureaucratic constraints in the operation of many NGOs and QUANGOs makes them more reliable and efficient implementing mechanisms of basic services.
![Page 10: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Summary (entire report):
PA in the Philippines has undergone change and transition because of the ff reasons:
![Page 11: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
PA in the Philippines has undergone change and transition because of the ff reasons:
Out of necessity. It needed to change because the prevailing one doesn’t work.
![Page 12: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
PA in the Philippines has undergone change and transition because of the ff reasons:
Force of Globalization. Globalization is inevitable and either you cope up with the world or you perish.
![Page 13: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
PA in the Philippines has undergone change and transition because of the ff reasons:
Influence of new trends (reinventing, BPR, and NPM) and inspiration from the success of other countries adopting the said changes.
![Page 14: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
PA in the Philippines has undergone change and transition because of the ff reasons:
The citizens are not satisfied. The Filipinos deserve more!
![Page 15: Reforming Government](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062319/558c0424d8b42a52788b4621/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The end.Thank you so much!