reference frame working group report
DESCRIPTION
Reference Frame Working Group Report. R émi Ferland Mike Piraszewski Geodetic Survey Division. Contents. Contributors Network Reference Frame Realization Status (IGS05) Weekly solutions (1400 – Now) Products Coordinates ERP’s Apparent Geocenter Summary. Contributors. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
AGU, S.F., Dec 10-14, 2007
Reference FrameWorking Group
Report
Rémi FerlandMike Piraszewski
Geodetic Survey Division
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008
Contents
• Contributors• Network
• Reference Frame Realization Status (IGS05)• Weekly solutions (1400 – Now)
• Products• Coordinates• ERP’s• Apparent Geocenter
• Summary
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008
Contributors
• Analysis Centers (ACs):• cod Center for Orbit Determination in Europe, AIUB,
Switzerland,• emr Natural Resources Canada, Canada,• esa European Space Operations Center, ESA, Germany,• gfz GeoForschungsZentrum, Germany,• jpl Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USA,• MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA,• ngs National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration / NGS,
USA,• sio Scripps Institution of Oceanography, USA,• grg (new) Groupe de Recherche en Geodesie Spatiale /CNES, France
• Global Network Associate Analysis Centers (GNAACs):• mit Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA,• ncl University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, U.K.
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008
IGS05 Reference Frame Realization (132 Stations)
Criterions:
GeometryMonumentationCollocationPerformanceData availabilityTime seriesHistorical
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008
Evolution of the Numberof IGS05 Stations Processed
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008
IGS05 Status
• Initially 132 stations (Wk 1400 – 06/11/05)• Recently ~100 stations + ~6 intermittent• Inactive ~26 … Main Causes:
– Discontinuities (15)– Equipment (13)– Earthquakes (2)
– Dormant (6)– Not operational (3)– IGS05 poor velocity (1)– Poor data (1)
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008
IGS05 Inactive Stations (26)
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008Evolution of the Number
of IGS Stations Processed
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008Stations in Recent IGS
Weekly Solutions
Up to ~350 Stations
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008ACs Coordinates Residuals
Avg. & Std. w.r.t. IGS05
H
N
E
Avg
. (m
m)
Std
. (m
m)
Scale=3x
Consistency:N&E ~ 3mm
H ~ 9mm
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008ACs Coordinates Residuals
Avg. & Std. w.r.t. IGS Weekly
H
N
E
Avg
. (m
m)
Std
. (m
m)
Scale=3x
jpl: switch to AbsoluteAntenna phase center
esa: new software
Consistency:N&E ~ 1-2mm
H ~ 3-4mm
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008ACs Coordinates Residuals
Avg. & Std. w.r.t. IGS Cumulative
H
N
E
Avg
. (m
m)
Std
. (m
m)
Scale=3x
Consistency:N&E ~ 2-3mm H ~ 5-7mm
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008
ACs Scale offset esa new software
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008ACs ERPs Residuals
w.r.t. IGS Combined
LOD
Xp
Xpr
Yp
Ypr
Excluded:cod [XY]p, [XY]prsio [XY]pr
Consistency:LOD ~ 10us[XY]p ~ 0.03-0.05mas[XY]pr ~ 0.10-0.20mas/d
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008ERPs Residuals Between
IGS Combined and Bulletin A
LOD
Xp
Xpr
Yp
Ypr
LOD(us)
Xp.01mas
Yp.01.mas
Xpr.01mas/d
Ypr.01mas/d
Avg -1 -4 5 -2 0
Std 18 5 4 11 12
Bull. A Pole Position Interpolated to mid-dayBull. A Pole Rate estimated from Pole position
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008IGS Combined Weekly
Apparent Geocenter
Z
YX
Scale=2x
Offset ~2mm
Annual PeriodX&Y ~4mm
Z ~5mm
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008
Z
X
Y
Res
. (m
m)
Std
. (m
m)
ACs Apparent Geocenter Residuals and Std. w.r.t. IGS Weekly
Excluded:gfzngs (until wk 1476)
Consistency:X&Y ~ 5mm
Z ~ 10mm
Scale=2x Scale=2x
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008
Summary (1/2)
• Reference Frame Stations 106 Active 15 Discontinuities 11 dormant + not operational
• Network of stations: 60 – 250 (+) per AC ~350 stations combined
• Some AC Parameters Excluded ERPs : cod ([XY]p, [XY]pr) ; sio ([XY]p) Geocenter : gfz, ngs (until wk 1476)
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008
Summary (2/2)
• ACs Coordinates Consistency w.r.t.: IGS05 (N-E ~ 3 mm, H ~ 9 mm) IGS Weekly (N-E ~ 1-2 mm, H ~ 3-4 mm) IGS Cumulative (N-E ~ 2-3 mm, H ~ 5-7 mm)
• ACs ERP’s Consistency: LOD ~ 10us ( [XY]p ~ 0.03-0.05 mas; [XY]pr ~ 0.10-0.20mas/d)
• Bull A. & IGS ERPs: LOD -1 ± 10 us Xp&Yp -4&+5 ± 5mas ; Xpr&Ypr -2&0 ± 12mas/d
• ACs Geocenter Consistency: X&Y ~5 mm; Z ~ 10mm
• AC’s Residual Time Series have small bias w.r.t. each other.
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008
Some Issues
• Provide warning or separate solutions when changes that can affect the products do occur (Usually done)
• When a change in Antenna type occur, logs and ACs databases need to be updated quickly, so proper calibration is applied.