recommendations on maximizing the positive synergies from the interactions between health systems...
TRANSCRIPT
Recommendations on Maximizing the Positive Synergies from the interactions between Health Systems Strengthening and disease specific Global Health Initiatives
Suwit WibulpolprasertSalif Samake
Co-chairsImplementer Consortium
Maximizing Positive Synergies
The aim
- How can disease specific Global Health Initiatives and Country Health Systems optimize their interactions to achieve their common goal of improving health outcomes?
- How can Health Systems be strengthened to support the achievements of disease specific GHIs targets
The road to the recommendations
– Establishment of the Implementers Consortium September 2008
– Academic and Civil Society consortia's workAugust 2008 – June 2009
– ConsultationsNovember 2008 – June 2009
– Implementers Consortium Meeting January, April and May 2009
– High Level Dialogue in Venice 22-23 June 2009
– Finalized recommendations and advocacy
The recommendations
– Be Very Bold
– Set Enumerable targets
– Enhance National leadership
– Improve Evidence – Communities Engagements
“VENICE” Recommendations
Be Very Bold
- Reduce ‘self’ towards ‘love’, ‘trust’ and ‘solidarity’ – disease specific GHIs and HSS
- More ‘health’ investment – Development partners and governments; both on disease specific GHIs and HSS
- More cost-effective investment – PHC based HSS
Set Enumerable Targets for HSS
- Agreement on indicators for each
building block of the HS – HRH, service delivery, financing, governance, health information, supply management, etc.
- Set Enumerable targets including targets on community engagement
- Make national health information systems strong enough to inform the progresses of the agreed targets
Enhance National leadership
- Sustainable National leadership:
- leadership
- HP/HS research and policy formulation
- Management and implementation capacity
- Participatory, Accountable and Transparent Governing structures – all level
- Focus on single consolidated National Health Development Plan – ‘3 Ones’ or IHP++++ or etc
Improve evidence
- Assess situation formulate a national development plan on HIS based on HMN framework, and also on the HSR, based on multi-sectoral involvement.
- Concrete and adequate investment to build long term sustainable national capacity on HIS and HSR
- Link the evidences to the set targets and the policy decision processes
Communities Engagement – at all levels
- Capacity building of community and civil society organizations – the right ones not the opportunists
- Engage them in the governing structures at all levels
- Decentralization and ownership by communities
Implementing the recommendations
International partners
- Shared accountability on their prior commitments
- Stop fighting and competition and move towards ‘co-petition’ - harmonization among partners based on ‘trust’ based relationship
- Needs assessment and agreement on comparative advantages
-
Implementing the recommendations
National policy makers
- build up strong and sustainable leadership to be able to deliver their commitments
- Increased domestic health funding – 15% of national public spending on health - Supportive policy environment and accountability
Implementing the recommendations
Programme managers
- Building sustainable management capacity
- Coordinated and unified response among programmes, GHIs and HSS
- Create common monitoring systems
Implementing the recommendations
Communities
- Drive ambitious HSS agenda
- Expand role of communities in health service delivery – ‘brain’, ‘bark’ and ‘Bite’
- Engagement in the governing structures at all levels.
Implementing the recommendations
Researchers
- Be a comprehensive ‘brain’ to HSS and GHIs
- Define and cost a long term HS research agenda
- Develop rigours methods to investigate interactions between HS and GHIs
Thank you