reanalysis needs for climate monitoring craig s long arun kumar and wesley ebisuzaki cpc noaa...

19
Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Upload: reginald-barber

Post on 19-Jan-2016

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring

Craig S LongArun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki

CPC

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 2: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring

• Outcomes from the May 2015 NCRTF Workshop.  

• Topics to cover:– What are the differences between:

• reanalysis for monitoring and • reforecast initializations?

– What reanalysis research advances can be transitioned to improve operational climate-reanalysis?

– How to coordinate the two reanalysis efforts in a resource-constrained environments?

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 3: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Why the Need for Climate Reanalysis

• Monitoring:– Monitoring real-time climate anomalies requires placing them in

a historical context, and hence, the need for a climate reanalysis

• Attribution:– and an increasing demand to provide explanations for extreme

climate events requires access to physically consistent climate reanalysis data sets

• Applications:– Climate reanalysis data sets are used in a wide array of societal

applications, e.g., decision making in the context of infrastructure development

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 4: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Why the Need for Climate Reanalysis

• Climate reanalysis data sets:– provide base climatology relative to which climate forecasts are

issued – are needed to verify hindcasts and real-time forecasts and

provide skill information to the users – are needed to bias correct and calibrate real-time forecasts – provide initial conditions for hindcasts and real-time climate

forecasts – ocean, land, sea ice

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 5: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Review

• Review of what we’ve got:– R1, R2, CFSR, 20CR

• What are key attributes / inadequacies of the above?

• What’s being done to improve things?

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 6: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis (R1)

• Circa 1995 model and data assimilation system • Atmospheric model – T62/L28 • 1948-present; maintained in real-time by CPC • Still widely used for the analysis of climate variability

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 7: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

R1 Issues

• Relies on data assimilation system that is 20 years old • Portability and maintenance • Uses satellite retrievals (that are under constant threat to

be discontinued)

• Replacement for R1 preferably should :– Extend over the same period – Not have climate trends & discontinuities worse than R1

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 8: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Climate Forecast System Reanalysis

• Coupled: Atmosphere, Land, Ocean, Sea Ice• Atmosphere: T382/L64 : 1979-2010• Upgraded to T574/L64 in 2010 with other changes• Six Streams• One year spin-up for atmosphere, land and ocean• Used as IC for hindcasts and CFS forecasts• Time constrained development and testing

– 1979-2010 was completed in limited time of available computer– No time to go back and rerun.– Only had R1 and ERA40 to compare against

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 9: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

CFSR Issues

Analysis during earlier period is an outlier

Multiple Streams – Zonal Avg. Resolution Change in 2010

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 10: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

As a consequence…

• Continued CPC’s reliance for climate monitoring products using R1

• Developed a research effort to understand some of the issues with climate reanalysis efforts, result of which is…

• The NOAA Climate Reanalysis (NCR) effort – Develop a hierarchical approach for climate reanalysis – Investigate the impact to the time-varying quality and density of

the observing system and determine ways to reduce this impact – Deliverable: develop a prototype climate reanalysis as a

potential candidate for replacing R1

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 11: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

NOAA Reanalysis Projects

• Continuing:– R1 – CFSR

• Current and Future:– AMIP (1850-present)– 20CRv3 (1850-present)– Conventional (1948-present)

• SFC + Radiosonde• Test results are promising

– Better analyses than R1

• Overlap of reanalyses should reveal biases– Increase certainty of trends

• Use common data assimilation infrastructure (EnkF) shared across NOAA

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 12: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Some Outstanding Research Issues

• Understanding reasons for discontinuities when new observational platforms come in

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 13: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Discontinuities due to changes in observational platforms

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 14: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

No Trend

No Trend

Data Source Change

How to deal with transitions?

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 15: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

No Trend

No Trend

Data Source Change

No Trend

No Trend

Transition

How to deal with transitions?

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 16: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Thoughts I

• Old and New sensors are looking at the same Earth!• Model reacts differently to new data versus old data

sources.– Why?

• More / sharper channels• Smaller errors• Higher density• Schemes developed for new data, not old data

– Solution?• Assuming new data is better….• Can we use new to bias adjust (train) the old

– How does this affect the Historical Context?• TOVS vs ATOVS

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 17: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Thoughts II

• What will model improvements provide?– Higher Horizontal– Higher/more vertical– SL vs Eularian– Model climatology– New Physics– New Parameterizations

• How to transition from density poor to density rich?

• Is assimilation of more data sources better? • Or is fewer, but higher quality better?• Above requires lots of testing!

– Testing on same model version to be used for next reanalysis?– Any benefit of testing on older model version?

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 18: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

What still needs to be done?

• What are barriers to getting things done:– Model architecture

• NEMS, NGGPS to the rescue?

– Funding for:• Manpower• Computers

– Testing– Running– Archive

– Coordination between centers• Assemble• Test• Evaluate

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Page 19: Reanalysis Needs for Climate Monitoring Craig S Long Arun Kumar and Wesley Ebisuzaki CPC NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP

Discussion?!

NOAA Climate Test Bed (CTB) Meeting – November 9-10, 2015 - NCWCP