real-time multiphase modeling: mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/marta diez -...

16
Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging by proactive flow assurance decisions Marta Dueñas Díez, Fernando R. Lema Zúñiga and José L. Peña Díez (Repsol) Kristian Holmås and Angela De Leebeeck (FMC Technologies) ------ ----

Upload: nguyenliem

Post on 18-Mar-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the

challenge of slugging by proactive flow assurance

decisions

Marta Dueñas Díez, Fernando R. Lema Zúñiga and José L. Peña Díez (Repsol)

Kristian Holmås and Angela De Leebeeck (FMC Technologies)

------

----

Page 2: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

2

Problem Statement / Objectives

- Challenge Description

- Status Real-time Flow Assurance Systems per 2010

- R&D Project Repsol – FMC Technologies

- Key Differentiating elements in developed model

- Pilot Selection

- Pilot Results

- Demo

of 15 MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014

Page 3: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

The Challenge

Longer / Hilly Terrains Deeper Colder

Challenge: Increased Flow Assurance Risks Lost barrels

Development of real-time monitoring slugging models. Proactive Decisions

MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014 3 of 15

Page 4: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

- Operation Modes:

- Real-time Mode (RT)

- What-if Mode (WI)

- Look-ahead Mode (LAH)

- Typical Advisory Modules:

- Pipeline Monitoring (P,T, holdup)

- Slug-catcher/Separator Monitoring

- Virtual Metering

- Production Ramp-up

- Optional Modules:

- Solids-handling related: Wax, Hydrate, Sand

- Integrity-related: Corrosion, Erosion, Leakage, Condition Monitoring

- Mitigation-related: Choke control, Pigging

Real-time Flow Assurance Models

4 of 15 MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014

Page 5: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

Real-time Flow Assurance Models, Status 2010

SPT Group FMC Technologies

17 implementations In 2 of the 17 (most advanced) Largest experience in virtual metering : 60% of Norway´s prod., over 400 wells

Expensive, difficult to tune and maintain systems

Strategy: Increased computation power Strategy: Tailor-made dynamic model for online applications

5 of 15 MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014

Page 6: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

R&D Collaboration Repsol – FMC Technologies

- Expected Benefits:

- New model / tool 30% cheaper in CAPEX and OPEX

- New model just in time for most Repsol´s Key Projects in Strategic Plan

- Knowhow transfer from FMC to Repsol on real-time FA systems

- Pilot test with real data from a Repsol field

- If pilot successful and final implementation in the piloted field, cost of project discounted

6 of 15 MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014

Page 7: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

Model Development

- 1-D drift-flux model with algebraic slip and friction relations for all flow regimes

- Separate mass equations for each phase (gas, oil, water/MEG)

- One total (drift-flux) momentum equation

- One pressure evolution equation that is coupled implicitly to the momentum equation

- One energy equation for the total energy

- Volume fraction constraint

7 of 15 MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014

Page 8: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

Key Differentiating Elements of New Model

• Fast and Efficient computation

•Well (SS) and pipeline (Dynamic)

•Better prediction of surge waves (slugging fronts)

• Possible to use gradient-based methods

• Fast and efficient computation

• Reliable flow regime models

• Widely tested in virtual metering applications

Fast and Reliable Slip Friction and

Choke model

Continuous Flow Regime

Transitions

Combination Steady-State and Dynamic

models

Strongly Implicity

Mixture Flux (SIMF)

Numerical Scheme

8 of 15 MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014

Page 9: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

Pilot Testing: Margarita (Bolivia BU)

EPTC 96 – Real-time Flow Assurance – M. Dueñas

- Key project in Strategic Plan, starting production in 2012 (Data availability)

- Gas condensate field with pipelines in hilly terrain (Slugging Potential)

- Margarita is well instrumented and has production historian PI (Real-time data)

- Support from BU Production and Reservoir Engineering Departments

- Interest in virtual metering and pipeline and slug-catcher monitoring

7

10

17

25 b

25 c

25 g

25 i

38

39 423 43

37

31

32

25 j

28

36

25 d

22

25

34

9

13

25 e

26

MGR-X3

MGR-X1h MGR-4ST

H1b layerPerforations 3987 m. / 4177.5 m.BHP 9097.6 psi. BHT 220 F.

9 5/8" x 7" Tie-back Packer @ 3880.5 m

7" TOL @ 3885 m.

9⅝" Casing shoe @ 3978 m.

H2 layerBHP 10164 psi.BHT 270 F.

7" Liner 32 ppf. 6" Special

7" Mechanical Plug @ +/- 4680 m.

Tope Tieback. @ 5219.4

TOTAL WELL TD @ 5801

PBTD @ 5440 m.

TOC @ 5442

5" TOL @ 5228.0 m.

7" Liner Shoe at 5293 m.

4½" Perforated Liner 13CrS

Top of fish @ 4694 m.

7" Mechanical Plug @ +/- 4663 m.

7

15

21

24

11

12

19

17

Cañería 10¾" 65.7 ppf.

9 5/8" Casing 53.5 ppf.8½" Special drift

Top of fish @ 3979 m.

- TCP string -

29

33

31

9 of 15

HCY-X1D

MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014

Page 10: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

Pilot Testing: Margarita (Bolivia BU)

10 of 15 MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014

Page 11: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

Pilot Testing: Margarita (Bolivia BU)

11 of 15

MGR-X3

MGR-X1H

MGR-4ST

HCY-X1D

Plano

MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014

Page 12: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

Pilot Testing: Virtual Metering results

12 of 15 MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014

Page 13: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

Pilot: What-if scenarios Demos

Shut-in 2 wells and Ramp-up

13 of 15

Pipeline Elevation

Flowrate Outlet

Slugcatcher

Liquid Holdup

Pressure Profile

Liquid Accumulated

in pipeline

Condensate Level

Slugcatcher

MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014

Page 14: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

Pilot Conclusions

Slugging potential can be minimized by the use of real-time flow assurance systems for operational planning

A few years back such RT-FA systems were too expensive and difficult to implement

Repsol engaged in an R&D collaboration with FMC to develop and pilot test a transient multiphase flow model tailor-made for RT-FA systems

Margarita was chosen as best candidate for piloting

Virtual Metering results and ramp-up and what-if scenarios demonstrate potential value

Data gathering to build these systems can be challenging

14 of 15 MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014

Page 15: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

Status 2014

In the Piloted Field a complete FAS system is being evaluated for final implementation

This type of tool has been presented to other 3 fields from the company´s Strategic Plan, and a preliminary evaluation is under way:

• An Offshore Deepwater Oil field for Virtual Metering to back up subsea multiphase meters.

• An Offshore Gas Condensate field for FAS application (slugging) .

• An Onshore Gas Condensate field for allocation in a gas pipeline shared by different fields.

FMC Technologies is currently using the FlowManager dynamic model in 4 online FAS systems:

• Shell Ormen Lange FAS: FlowManager replaced Olga in 2011 giving improved prediction on surge waves.

• Statoil Åsgard B FAS: FlowManager will replace Olga in 2014. Includes subsea gas compression.

• BG Knarr FAS and Lundin Brynhild FAS delivered and installed in 2014.

15 of 15 MCE Deepwater Development, Madrid - April 2014

Page 16: Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/Marta Diez - Repsol.pdf · Real-time multiphase modeling: Mitigating the challenge of slugging

Thank you / Questions